Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 649, May 2021
Article Number A105
Number of page(s) 16
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039291
Published online 21 May 2021

© ESO 2021

1. Introduction

Over the last decade, it has been found that some luminous (1011 L < LIR(8−1000μm) < 1012 L) and ultraluminous (LIR > 1012 L) infrared galaxies (LIRGs and ULIRGs) in the local Universe exhibit emission from rotational lines of HCN in its vibrationally excited v2 = 1 state (hereafter HCN-vib; e.g., Sakamoto et al. 2010; Imanishi & Nakanishi 2013; Aalto et al. 2015a; Martín et al. 2016). The brightest emission has been found in compact obscured nuclei (CONs; ΣHCN − vib > 1 L pc−2 in the J = 3−2 transition, r > 5 pc) whose dusty cores may be optically thick up to millimeter wavelengths (e.g., Sakamoto et al. 2013, 2017; Martín et al. 2016; Scoville et al. 2017; Aalto et al. 2019). In these regions continuum photons are trapped by dust, creating a “greenhouse” effect that may increase the central dust temperatures to several hundreds of Kelvin (González-Alfonso & Sakamoto 2019). These high temperatures give rise to an intense mid-infrared radiation field that is able to populate the vibrational states of molecules such as HCN. With sizes on the order of 10 to 100 pc and dust temperatures around 100 K at the far-infrared photosphere, CONs may be able to supply a significant fraction of the total infrared luminosity of their host galaxies (e.g., González-Alfonso et al. 2012; Falstad et al. 2015). Owing to the obscured nature of their nuclei, the ultimate embedded source of the high luminosity in CONs is still unclear; it may be an accreting supermassive black hole (SMBH) in an active galactic nucleus (AGN), a nuclear starburst, or a combination of both. If CONs are mainly powered by hidden AGN activity, they may represent a phase of rapid accretion onto the SMBH, almost completely surrounded by high column densities of obscuring material, following a merger or interaction event (Kocevski et al. 2015; Ricci et al. 2017; Blecha et al. 2018; Boettcher et al. 2020). Regardless of the exact nature of the hidden power source, studies of these objects could help us understand growth processes in galaxy nuclei, as well as the relations between black hole mass and bulge properties (e.g., Magorrian et al. 1998; Kormendy & Ho 2013). An interesting comparison may be made with the compact star-forming galaxies found at redshifts 2−3 (e.g., Barro et al. 2013). These are heavily dust obscured (Barro et al. 2014) galaxies with a high incidence of AGN activity (Barro et al. 2014; Kocevski et al. 2017) and are thought to form through the dissipative contraction of gas-rich galaxies, triggering a central starburst rapidly growing the stellar bulge (e.g., Zolotov et al. 2015; Kocevski et al. 2017; Tacchella et al. 2018).

An important way in which the intense nuclear activity may influence the host galaxy is by mechanical feedback in the form of winds and outflows. A large fraction of ULIRGs are observed to have wide angle molecular outflows that are detectable using the median velocities of far-infrared OH absorptions (Veilleux et al. 2013). These outflow signatures have never been observed in CONs, which instead often show signatures of inflowing gas in the far-infrared OH lines (Falstad et al. 2019). However, at least some of the CONs host compact and collimated outflows observable at longer wavelengths using spectral lines of, for example, CO and HCN (e.g., Barcos-Muñoz et al. 2018; Falstad et al. 2018, 2019). It is still unclear whether such compact outflows can be seen in all CONs and whether they are connected to the kiloparsec-scale dust features seen in optical images (e.g., Falstad et al. 2018; Aalto et al. 2019), either as the base of continuous outflows or as the most recent outbursts in recurring cycles of outflow events.

A major problem when studying the central regions of CONs is that the high column densities preclude observations at wavelengths up to at least the far-infrared owing to dust absorption. Some objects are opaque at almost all wavelengths with only a narrow range between the submillimeter and radio that is optically thin (e.g., Arp 220; Barcos-Muñoz et al. 2015). Although observed at (sub)millimeter wavelengths, where the dust emission may become optically thin, interpreting molecular spectral line emission can be difficult. The radiative transfer of traditional tracers of dense molecular gas such as HCN and HCO+ is complicated by absorption because of large columns of cooler foreground gas along the line of sight to the nucleus (e.g., Aalto et al. 2015a; Martín et al. 2016; Imanishi et al. 2016a).

In these situations, HCN-vib provides a tool to probe deeper into the nucleus (e.g., Martín et al. 2016; Aalto et al. 2019), but it can also be used as a survey tool to search for obscured activity (e.g., Aalto et al. 2019). The rotational transitions of HCN-vib occur within the vibrationally excited v2 = 1 state, which has an energy above ground of E/k = 1024 K. This state is doubly degenerate, so that the rotational states are split into two levels, f and e. The J = 3−2 v2 = 1f transition that we use in this paper occurs at frequency 267.199 GHz. The critical density of the v2 = 1−0 transition is ∼5 × 1011 cm−3, that is, high enough for collisional excitation to be unlikely. Instead, the vibrational state is likely populated through radiative excitation directly from the ground state by 14 μm photons (Ziurys & Turner 1986). For the state to be efficiently populated in this way, radiation with a brightness temperature in excess of 100 K at 14 μm is required (Aalto et al. 2015a). Since the first extragalactic detection by Sakamoto et al. (2010), different HCN-vib transitions have been observed in many other galaxies (e.g., Imanishi & Nakanishi 2013; Imanishi et al. 2016a,b, 2018; Aalto et al. 2015b,a; Martín et al. 2016). Efforts have been made to make inventories of these existing extragalactic detections. For example, in a sample of nine galaxies, most of which are (U)LIRGs, by Aalto et al. (2015a), HCN-vib lines were detected in eight. Five of these could be classified as CONs with the definition used at the time. A follow-up study by Falstad et al. (2019) found 19 (U)LIRGs with existing observations covering the HCN-vib frequencies. Of these, 13 were detected and 7, including the 5 found by Aalto et al. (2015a), could be classified as CONs. However, there have been no systematic searches for CONs, and an understanding of the prevalence of CONs will help assess their importance to the galaxy evolution process.

In this paper, we present the first results of CON-quest, a volume limited survey of infrared-luminous galaxies, with the aim to establish how common CONs are in the local (z < 0.08) Universe. We introduce our selection criterion in Sect. 2 and the sample in Sect. 3, describe the new observations and data reduction in Sect. 4, and present the results in Sects. 5. In Sect. 6 we discuss the results before summarizing our conclusions in Sect. 7.

2. Finding compact obscured nuclei

Compact obscured nuclei are characterized by high column densities of warm dust and gas within relatively small distances of their centers. The CONs are typically much smaller than the size of central molecular zones, which have radii of several 100 pc (e.g., Israel 2020). In principle, this means that properties, such as the column density and temperature of obscuring material as well as the physical size of the nucleus, must be determined to identify CONs. Each source would then require detailed radiative transfer modeling and excitation analysis (e.g., González-Alfonso et al. 2012), or high-resolution multifrequency continuum observations (e.g., Aalto et al. 2019). However, with the discovery of bright HCN-vib emission from known CONs, a new tool to be used in surveys such as this one was provided.

Previous studies of CONs have often focused on the ratio of the HCN-vib luminosity to the total infrared luminosity of the galaxy, and CONs generally have LHCN − vib/LIR > 10−8 (e.g., Aalto et al. 2015a; Falstad et al. 2019). While this criterion is easy to use, it has a significant drawback in that it includes both emission originating mainly in the nucleus (LHCN − vib) and emission that is likely to have a substantial contribution from the entire host galaxy (LIR). This means that it may miss CONs in systems where the infrared emitting region is spatially extended or where multiple nuclei are present. Instead of using this criterion, we identify CONs as galaxies with ΣHCN − vib > 1 L pc−2 in the J = 3−2 transition over a region with a radius of at least 5 pc. To avoid issues related to line blending, we use the size of the 1.1 mm continuum when computing the HCN-vib surface brightness. In general, this is slightly larger than the size of the HCN-vib emitting region, but a lower limit to the size of the far-infrared photosphere of the source (González-Alfonso & Sakamoto 2019). The impact of this on ΣHCN − vib can be estimated by comparing the extents of the continuum and HCN-vib emission in sources for which the latter is resolved and not affected by line blending. In doing so, we find that the surface brightness of HCN-vib is generally underestimated by less than a factor of two (1.8 in ESO 320-G030, 1.5 in IRAS 17578-0400, and 1.3 in ESO 173-G015).

Our new criterion, just as the previously used one, is still purely empirical and based on the properties of known CONs and less obscured sources. For example, the CONs Arp 220 W and Zw 049.057, which both have column densities NH2 ≳ 5 × 1024 cm−2 toward the central ∼50 pc (González-Alfonso et al. 2012; Falstad et al. 2015), have ΣHCN − vib > 3 L pc−2 (Aalto et al. 2015a; Martín et al. 2016; this work), while Mrk 231, which is generally not considered a CON because of its lower column densities (NH2 ∼ 1024 cm−2) on similar scales (González-Alfonso et al. 2014), has ΣHCN − vib ∼ 0.3 L pc−2 (Aalto et al. 2015b). For further comparison, our limit is approximately two orders of magnitude larger than the HCN-vib surface brightness seen in the super star clusters of NGC 253 (Krieger et al. 2020).

As a consequence of the complex dependence of the HCN-vib emission on other properties of the source (González-Alfonso & Sakamoto 2019), a measured HCN-vib surface brightness cannot be directly translated into physical properties such as the column density and size of an observed source. However, the examples in the previous paragraph may give some indication of the compactness and amount of obscuration in sources selected by our criterion. Furthermore, some properties can be estimated from the recent work by González-Alfonso & Sakamoto (2019), who model the continuum and HCN-vib emission from buried nuclear regions of galaxies. The models employ a spherically symmetric approach, simulating either an AGN or a nuclear starburst as the heating source and exploring the ranges NH2 = 1023 − 1025 cm−2 for the H2 column density and ΣIR = 1.4 × 107 − 2.2 × 108 L pc−2 for the surface brightness. For the typical luminosity of a LIRG or ULIRG in our sample, this corresponds to radii of ∼17−70 pc or ∼50−200 pc, respectively, assuming that all of the infrared luminosity is produced in a single component. In these simplified models, ΣHCN − vib > 1 L pc−2 in the J = 3−2 transition can be achieved in the whole range of explored surface brightnesses and with both types of heating sources, as long as the column density exceeds NH2 > 1024 cm−2, corresponding to an optical depth of ∼1.5 at 100 μm. We note that this criterion and in fact any criterion based on the HCN-vib luminosity, assumes that apart from large columns of obscuring material a CON also has a power source that is strong enough to produce the mid-infrared radiation field required to excite HCN-vib.

3. Sample

As mentioned in Sect. 1, no systematic searches for CONs have been carried out and only seven have been found so far: two in ULIRGs, five in LIRGs, and none in sub-LIRGs (1010 L ≤ LIR < 1011 L; Aalto et al. 2015a; Falstad et al. 2019). Owing to the limited statistical data, it is still uncertain how common the CONs are and how their prevalence depends on luminosity. As a first step to remedy this, we compiled a sample of far-infrared luminous galaxies drawn from the infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS; Neugebauer et al. 1984) revised bright galaxy sample (RBGS; Sanders et al. 2003).

3.1. Sample selection

The RBGS is a complete sample of extragalactic objects with IRAS 60 μm flux densities greater than 5.24 Jy, covering the entire sky surveyed by IRAS at Galactic latitudes |b|> 5°. Our CON-quest sample was selected from the RBGS based on the far-infrared luminosities, declinations, and distances listed in Table 1 of Sanders et al. (2003) using the following far-infrared luminosity, LFIR(40−400 μm), criteria:

  • 1012 L ≤ LFIR, δ < 30°, D < 330 Mpc;

  • 1011 L ≤ LFIR < 1012 L, δ < 15°, D < 76 Mpc;

  • 1010 L ≤ LFIR < 1011 L, δ < 15°, 10 < D < 15.5 Mpc.

Declination and distance limits were set to ensure reasonable integration times (tint ≲ 2 h) and sample sizes (≤20 in each luminosity bin) to make the survey feasible. Calculating the far-infrared luminosity using the prescription in Table 1 of Sanders & Mirabel (1996) and the relatively conservative assumptions f100 = 2 × f60 and C = 1.8, we note that the full RBGS is volume limited down to the relevant far-infrared luminosities for the low- and mid-luminosity bins. For the distance limit in the high-luminosity bin, however, the RBGS is only volume limited for LFIR ≳ 1.8 × 1012 L. On comparing with the more sensitive IRAS 1.2-Jy redshift survey (Strauss et al. 1992; Fisher et al. 1995), we see that only one source, IRAS 06035–7102, would be added if we used the same selection criteria on that sample.

With the exception of the LIRG NGC 1068, which is in the low-luminosity bin when selecting based on far-infrared luminosity (between 40 μm and 400 μm), the high-, mid-, and low-luminosity bins contain ULIRGs, LIRGs, and sub-LIRGs, respectively. These categories are defined using total infrared luminosity (between 8 μm and 1000 μm) but, as there is only one exception, hereafter we refer to the far-infrared luminosity bins by these names. In total, our criteria select 48 systems (some of which contain multiple galaxies), 8 in the ULIRG-sample and 20 each in the LIRG and sub-LIRG samples. However, observations were not obtained of the galaxy pairs IC 4687/6 in the LIRG sample and NGC 4568/7 in the sub-LIRG sample. A list of all observed galaxies and some of their properties is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sample galaxies.

3.2. Selection bias

The selection based on far-infrared luminosity (between 40 and 400 μm) instead of total infrared luminosity (between 8 and 1000 μm) may introduce a bias against warm sources that emit a larger fraction of their radiation at shorter wavelengths. One way to investigate this potential infrared emission bias is to compare the distributions of the IRAS 25 μm to 60 μm flux density ratios (f25/f60) in our sample and the IRAS RBGS from which it was selected. In Fig. 1 we make this comparison. The top panel shows the distribution in the RBGS and the middle panel shows the distribution for the CON-quest sample using a dark shade. The f25/f60 distribution of the CON-quest sample is clearly skewed toward lower values when compared to the RBGS. In the middle panel we also included the sources required, together with the CON-quest sample, to complete a sample selected based on the total (instead of far-infrared) infrared luminosities. The distribution of this combined sample is more similar to that of the underlying RBGS, as can also be seen in the bottom panel in which we show the empirical distribution functions of the different samples.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Distributions of IRAS 25/60 μm ratios in various samples. Top: histogram showing the distribution in the IRAS revised bright galaxy sample (RBGS). Middle: stacked histogram showing the distribution in the sample that would have resulted if sources were selected based on the total infrared luminosity (between 8 μm and 1000 μm) instead of the far-infrared luminosity (between 40 and 400 μm), with the CON-quest sample marked using a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the RBGS (solid black), the CON-quest sample (dash-dotted gray), the additional sources required to complete an infrared selected sample (dotted gray), and the total infrared selected sample (dashed red).

4. Observations and data reduction

For this survey, we targeted the HCN-vib l = 1fJ = 3−2 transition with rest frequency 267.199 GHz. In the literature and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) archives, we found preexisting observations of this transition in 4 ULIRGs, 6 LIRGs, and 1 sub-LIRG. Three sub-LIRGs had ALMA observations of the corresponding J = 4−3 transition, and as the line was not detected in any of the sources we did not reobserve these sources in the J = 3−2 transition. We conducted new observations of 4 ULIRGs, 13 LIRGs, and 15 sub-LIRGs. The setup and the data reduction process of the new observations as well as our treatment of existing data are described in the following sections.

4.1. New ALMA observations

New observations of the HCN-vib l = 1fJ = 3−2 transitions were performed as part of two ALMA band 6 projects, 2017.1.00759.S and 2018.1.01344.S. In total, 32 sources that fulfill the selection criteria of Sect. 3.1 were observed in these two projects: 4 ULIRGs, 13 LIRGs, and 15 sub-LIRGs.

2017.1.00759.S. The four sources observed as part of this project were the ULIRGs IRAS 09022–3615, IRAS 13120–5453, IRAS F14378–3651, and IRAS 17208–0014. The observations took place in September 2018 with the intermediate array configuration C43-5 (baseline lengths between 15 m and 2 km). The maximum recoverable scale (MRS, defined as 0.6λ/Bmin, where Bmin is the minimum baseline length) is ∼9″ (6−13 kpc).

2018.1.01344.S. Thirteen LIRGs (ESO 173-G015, ESO 221-IG10, ESO 286-G035, ESO 320-G030, IC 4734, IC 5179, IRAS F17138-1017, IRAS 17578-0400, NGC 2369, NGC 3110, NGC 5135, NGC 5734, UGC 2982) and 15 sub-LIRGs (NGC 660, NGC 1055, NGC 1559, NGC 1792, NGC 3627, NGC 3628, NGC 3810, NGC 4254, NGC 4303, NGC 4501, NGC 4527, NGC 4536, NGC 4654, NGC 4666, NGC 5248) were observed for this project between October 2018 and October 2019. The observations were carried out with the intermediate array configurations C43-4 and C43-5 with baseline lengths between 15 m and 2.5 km, resulting in an MRS of ∼9″ (0.4−3.5 kpc).

The spectral setup for all 32 sources was the same: two spectral windows centered at the HCO+ (νrest = 267.558 GHz) and HCN 3−2 (νrest = 265.886 GHz) transitions in the upper sideband. Two more spectral windows were used to recover the band 6 continuum emission in the lower sideband. The spectral windows were set with a bandwidth of 1.875 GHz, and a channel width of 3.9 MHz. During the observations, bright quasars were used for bandpass and flux calibration; weaker quasars close to each target source were used as phase and gain calibrators.

The imaging of the visibility sets for all 32 sources was performed using the “tclean” task in the Common Astronomy Software Applications (CASA1; McMullin et al. 2007) package version 5.4.0. Applying a natural weighting resulted in data cubes with beam sizes of roughly 0.3″ (spatial scales between ∼45 and ∼95 pc) for the ULIRGs in 2017.1.00759.S, and beam sizes between ∼0.2″ and ∼0.8″ (spatial scales between ∼5 and ∼35 pc) for the LIRGs and sub-LIRGs in 2018.1.01344.S (see Table 2 for more information). For analysis purposes we Hanning-smoothed the data cubes to a velocity resolution of 20 km s−1. The resulting 1σ noise levels per channel for each source are listed in Table 2. After calibration and imaging within CASA, all image cubes were converted into the flexible image transport system (FITS) format for further analysis.

Table 2.

Properties of the new ALMA observations.

To obtain the HCN-vib fluxes and upper limits in sources with relatively narrow well-separated spectral lines, we integrated the data cubes over the velocity range ±150 km s−1 around the systemic velocity of the transition, calculated from the redshifts given in Table 1 in the heliocentric frame. This velocity range was set to avoid blending issues with the HCO+ transition that is blueward of the HCN-vib line by approximately 400 km s−1. We then extracted the fluxes from a region with a diameter of twice the Gaussian full width at half maximum of the velocity integrated HCO+ emission. To compensate for line blending in sources with strong and broad lines, we instead obtained the flux through a fit to the spatially integrated spectrum extracted from the same region. In the case of a nondetection of the HCN-vib line, we set a 3σ upper limit to the flux based on the rms in the velocity integrated map and the line width of the ground-state transitions.

We obtained estimates for the continuum properties from two-dimensional Gaussian fits to the continuum maps using the CASA task IMFIT, which deconvolves the synthesized beam from the fitted component size; see Condon (1997) for a discussion of the error estimates in this process. In sources with multiple continuum components, we use the results from the strongest one, as this is where a potential CON would be most likely to be found.

4.2. Archival and literature data

Details about the observation setups and data reduction for sources with preexisting data can be found in the references listed in the last column of Table 3. For previous ALMA observations, we have not used the published values for the HCN-vib line fluxes in cases where these exist. We instead extracted these in the same way as for newly observed sources, using the calibrated data sets obtained from the principal investigators of the projects in question. Some differences in the instrumental setup compared to our new observations exist, but none that are large enough to impact the appropriate extraction procedure.

Table 3.

Results of HCN-vib J = 3−2 and continuum measurements.

5. Results

Luminosities of HCN-vib, continuum properties, and HCN-vib surface brightnesses are presented in Table 3. For comparison with earlier work, the LHCN − vib/LIR ratio is also listed. Line luminosities are calculated using Eq. (1) of Solomon & Vanden Bout (2005), applied to HCN-vib as follows:

L HCN vib = 1.04 × 10 3 S HCN vib Δ v ν rest ( 1 + z ) 1 D L 2 , $$ \begin{aligned} L_{\mathrm{HCN-vib} }=1.04\times 10^{-3}S_{\mathrm{HCN-vib} }\,\Delta { v}\,\nu _{\mathrm{rest} }(1+z)^{-1}D_{\mathrm{L} }^{2}, \end{aligned} $$(1)

where LHCN − vib is the HCN-vib luminosity measured in solar luminosities, SHCN − vib Δv is the velocity integrated flux in Jansky kilometers per second, νrest is the rest frequency in gigahertz, and DL is the luminosity distance in megaparsecs.

In total, emission from vibrationally excited HCN is detected in 5 of the eight ULIRGs, 5 of the 19 LIRGs, and in none of the 19 sub-LIRGs. The corresponding numbers when considering individual nuclei resolved by our observations are 6 of 12 in ULIRGs and 5 of 20 in the LIRGs. For 3 of the LIRGs, ESO 320-G030, ESO 173-G015, and IRAS 17578-0400, and 1 of the ULIRGs, IRAS F14378-3651, this is the first detection of vibrationally excited HCN. Another ULIRG, IRAS 17208-0014, was previously detected in the HCN-vib J = 4−3 transition, but this is the first detection of the J = 3−2 transition. We also note that HCN-vib J = 3−2 emission, with a luminosity of 2.2 L, was recently detected in NGC 1068 by Imanishi et al. (2020). In Fig. 2, we present the spectra of sources with new detections of HCN-vib J = 3−2 emission. The transition is clearly visible in the spectra of all sources except for IRAS F14378-3651, in which the integrated intensity map was used to confirm the detection.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Continuum subtracted central spectra of galaxies with new HCN-vib J = 3−2 detections. Frequencies of some lines commonly seen in CONs are denoted with vertical dashed lines. In many of the sources, the ground-state HCN and HCO+ transitions are self-absorbed.

In IRAS 17208-0014 the line widths are large, causing noticeable blending of HCN-vib with the HCO+ transition. Self- and continuum absorption by the latter (see Aalto et al. 2015a, for a more thorough discussion) complicates the situation further, warranting a short explanation of the features in this spectrum. The peaks on each side of the central frequency of the HCO+ transition are both part of the HCO+ feature. The peculiar shape is caused by an emission component, peaking close to the central frequency of the transition, combined with an absorption component that has its maximum at a slightly higher frequency. Finally, the prominent wing on the low-frequency side of the HCO+ transition is HCN-vib emission.

5.1. Detection rate of compact obscured nuclei

Using the criterion ΣHCN − vib > 1 L pc−2 in the J = 3−2 transition, three ULIRGs, four LIRGs, and no sub-LIRGs from our sample are classified as CONs. This translates into CON detection rates of 38 13 + 18 % $ 38^{+18}_{-13}\% $ in the ULIRG sample, 21 6 + 12 % $ 21^{+12}_{-6}\% $ in the LIRG sample, and 0 0 + 9 % $ 0^{+9}_{-0}\% $ in the sub-LIRG sample. If we instead consider individual resolved nuclei, the detection rates are 25 8 + 16 % $ 25^{+16}_{-8}\% $ in the ULIRG sample and 20 6 + 12 % $ 20^{+12}_{-6}\% $ in the LIRG sample. The 1σ confidence intervals were estimated using the beta distribution quantile technique (Cameron 2011). For reference, with the old criterion, LHCN − vib/LIR > 10−8, the same seven CONs would have been identified, together with an additional one in IRAS F12112+0305 NE.

5.2. Distributions of host galaxy properties

Armed with the CON detection rates, we can explore links with the properties of their host galaxies. As there were no detections in the sub-LIRG sample we only include the (U)LIRGs in this comparison.

Falstad et al. (2019) suggest that galaxies with high inclination may be more likely to also have high LHCN − vib/LIR ratios, and thus be classified as CONs. To assess whether CONs are preferentially found in high inclination systems, we can compare the distribution of inclinations for CONs with that of the rest of the sample galaxies. To do this, we use optical estimates of the inclinations taken from the HyperLEDA database2 (Makarov et al. 2014). An important caveat is that inclinations are difficult to determine in the disturbed interacting galaxies that are common in the most luminous systems. The histogram and the empirical distribution functions, which are estimates of the true cumulative distribution functions, in Fig. 3 suggest that, while high inclinations might be preferred, the distribution of inclinations is statistically not significantly different. An Anderson-Darling test (e.g., Scholz & Stephens 1987) applied to the data confirms this, giving a probability of more than 25% that the populations are drawn from the same underlying distribution. However, we caution that the nuclear orientation may not be well connected to that of the larger-scale structure (e.g., Pjanka et al. 2017).

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Distribution of inclinations in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

Another interesting property in the context of CONs, which are thought to contain warm cores with intense mid-infrared radiation fields, is the relative strength of the mid- and far-infrared emission as traced by the IRAS 25 μm to 60 μm flux density ratio (f25/f60). Visual inspection of the histogram and the empirical distribution functions in Fig. 4 suggests that the CONs and non-CONs have different distributions; most of the CONs have lower f25/f60 ratios than the non-CONs. An Anderson-Darling test between the f25/f60 distributions of the CONs and the rest of the sample confirms this notion; the probability that the populations are drawn from the same underlying distribution is less than 1%. This result is interesting in the light of the sample being biased toward objects with lower f25/f60 ratios; see Sect. 6.4 for further discussion.

thumbnail Fig. 4.

Distribution of IRAS 25/60 μm ratios in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

As the CONs are characterized by their high column densities of obscuring material, it may be of interest to investigate the strength of the 9.7 μm silicate feature (s9.7μm) and the equivalent width of the 6.2 μm polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) feature (EQW6.2μm). These two properties are used in the mid-infrared classification plot devised by Spoon et al. (2007) to separate AGN-dominated, starburst-dominated, and deeply obscured nuclei. The strength of the silicate feature is defined as s9.7μm = ln(f9.7μm/C9.7μm), where f9.7μm is the measured flux density at 9.7 μm and C9.7μm is the continuum flux density at the same wavelength in the absence of an absorption feature. In the diagnostic plot of Spoon et al. (2007, their Fig. 1), deeply obscured nuclei are characterized by strong silicate absorptions and low PAH equivalent widths. In Figs. 5 and 6 we present the histograms and empirical distribution functions of these two properties for the (U)LIRG samples, using data collected by Stierwalt et al. (2013). While the distributions of s9.7μm seem to differ between the CONs and the rest of the sample, the distributions of EQW6.2μm are more similar. Anderson-Darling tests indicate that the probabilities that the CON and non-CON populations are drawn from the same underlying distributions are lower than 5% and higher than 25% for s9.7μm and EQW6.2μm, respectively.

thumbnail Fig. 5.

Distribution of the apparent depth of the 9.7 μm silicate absorption feature in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

thumbnail Fig. 6.

Distribution of the equivalent width of the 6.2 μm PAH feature in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

5.3. Noncircular motions in galaxies with compact obscured nuclei

An important way in which the CON and the extended host galaxy may affect each other is by in- or outflows of gas onto or from the nucleus. The presence of such noncircular motions could also provide clues to how the CONs may evolve with time. Falstad et al. (2019) note that galaxies with bright HCN-vib emission tend to show redshifted OH ground-state absorption lines at 119 μm, indicating possible molecular inflows. One of the CONs in our survey, IRAS 17578–0400, does not have any observations of this doublet. However, this source has observations of the other ground-state doublet at 79 μm in the Herschel science archive (see Appendix A), showing a small redshift with respect to the systemic velocity of the galaxy.

Another result from Falstad et al. (2019) is that at longer wavelengths CONs instead tend to show evidence of molecular outflows, often compact and collimated. The sensitivity of our new observations allows for the detection of faint spectral features, probing possible low-mass outflows. For IRAS 17208–0014, this is hindered by the large line widths that cause severe blending with nearby lines of CH2NH and vibrationally excited HC3N, but a possible outflow signature in the form of blueshifted (∼ − 70 km s−1) self-absorption features can be seen in the HCN and HCO+ ground-state lines in Fig. 2. In ESO 320-G030 (Fig. 7) we see that the HCN emission at projected velocities between 0 and ±100 km s−1 and between ±200 and ±300 km s−1 from the systemic velocity has a component that is elongated along an axis with a position angle (PA) of ∼40° east of north. This is almost perpendicular to the major kinematic axis, which has a PA of ∼135° as determined from the velocity field seen outside of the most nuclear region; this is consistent with the value found by Pereira-Santaella et al. (2016) from observations of CO J = 2−1. The orientation of the elongated structure is similar to that of the outflow reported by Pereira-Santaella et al. (2016), which has a PA of between 10° and 40°. Interestingly, the absorption features in the HCN and HCO+ ground-state lines in ESO 320-G030 are redshifted with respect to the emission, possibly indicating that the absorbing gas is moving inward. We do not see any signatures of misaligned high-velocity emission in IRAS 17578-0400, but there is a tentative signature at lower velocities. In Fig. 8 we see that the emission within ±80 km s−1 (projected) of the systemic velocity is elongated along the kinematic minor axis (PA ∼ 25°, again determined from the velocity field outside the most nuclear region), with a possible offset between the red- and blueshifted emission components along this axis. For this galaxy, we did not find any published observations of CO to compare the orientations of the kinematic axes in the nucleus and on larger scales. The absorption features in the HCN and HCO+ ground-state lines of IRAS 17578-0400 do not show any strong velocity shifts, although that of the HCN line appears slightly redshifted compared to the emission.

thumbnail Fig. 7.

Intensity weighted velocity (moment 1) map and integrated intensity contours of HCN taken over the velocity ranges 0−100, 100−200, and 200−300 km s−1 from the systemic velocity (∼3080 km s−1) on the red- (solid) and blueshifted (dashed) sides in ESO 320-G030. Velocity contours are given every 30 km s−1. Integrated intensity contours start at 0.24, 0.16, and 0.11 Jy beam−1 km s−1 (5σ) for the three velocity intervals, respectively, and increase by factors of 2.

thumbnail Fig. 8.

Intensity weighted velocity (moment 1) map and integrated intensity contours of HCN taken over the velocity ranges 0−80, 80−160, and 160−240 km s−1 from the systemic velocity (∼4000 km s−1) on the red- (solid) and blueshifted (dashed) sides in IRAS 17578-0400. Velocity contours are given every 30 km s−1. Integrated intensity contours start at 0.16, 0.20, and 0.16 Jy beam−1 km s−1 (5σ) for the three velocity intervals, respectively, and increase by factors of 2.

6. Discussion

6.1. Prevalence of compact obscured nuclei

With the currently used definition (see Sect. 2), a remarkably high fraction of local LIRG and ULIRG systems, ∼20% and ∼40%, respectively, are categorized as CONs. However, the (U)LIRGs themselves are relatively rare (see, e.g., the luminosity function in Fig. 12 by Sanders et al. 2003), and in lower luminosity galaxies the CON prevalence goes down significantly to a value close to zero. With a (U)LIRG number density of ∼6 × 10−5 Mpc−3 in the local Universe (Sanders et al. 2003), we should thus expect a CON density of ∼10−5 Mpc−3, taking into account the lower detection rate in less luminous systems. As discussed in Sect. 3.2, there is a potential bias due to our selection criteria, which misses warm galaxies. If CONs are predominantly found in cold sources, as suggested in Sect. 6.3, the inclusion of the warm sources results in an overall decrease of ∼50% in the CON detection rate. On the other hand, it is possible that the only warm CON so far, NGC 4418, is not an exception but rather an example of a group of sources belonging to the second peak of a possible bimodal distribution. If this is the case, the local number density of CONs may even be slightly higher than estimated in this work.

Local CONs are important in order to conduct detailed studies, but in the context of galaxy evolution it is also important to determine how common they were at earlier times when the star formation rate and rate of black hole growth in the Universe was higher (e.g., Chary & Elbaz 2001; Marconi et al. 2004). At z ∼ 1, the number density of (U)LIRGs is up to 2 orders of magnitude larger than at z < 0.1 (Le Floc’h et al. 2005; Magnelli et al. 2009, 2013). It is therefore likely that if the CON fraction in (U)LIRGs remains high at high redshift, CONs may have played an important role in the evolution of galaxy nuclei. A point of caution, however, is that ULIRGs in the early Universe appear to have structures that are different from those of their local counterparts (e.g., Rujopakarn et al. 2011).

6.2. Sources just below the limit

Our sample contains one LIRG (ESO 173-G015) and two ULIRG nuclei (Arp 220 E and IRAS F12112+0305 NE), which have clear HCN-vib detections but have values of ΣHCN − vib that are up to a factor of 5 too low to be classified as CONs. We might ask how these objects should be classified and what their relation to the CONs is. If we compare the surface brightnesses to those of the CONs, we see that the weakest CON has a ΣHCN − vib value that is less than a factor of two larger than that of the strongest non-CON. Interestingly, when considering the LHCN − vib/LIR ratio using the infrared emission from the individual nuclei, Arp 220 E has a higher ratio than the neighboring CON Arp 220 W (Martín et al. 2016). In addition to the HCN-vib emission, the spectra of these galaxies also exhibit some other features commonly seen in CONs. These include possible CH2NH lines, double-peaked profiles in the HCN and HCO+ ground-state lines (see Fig. 2), and, at least in ESO 173-G015, a clearly detected HOC+ line. With these similarities in mind, it is possible that these objects are related to the CONs, either as less extreme versions, as former CONs, or as objects in a transition phase to become CONs. With an empirically based, but still somewhat arbitrary, limit separating CONs from non-CONs, it also may be fruitful to think about the CONs as a population of sources at one of the extreme ends of a continuous distribution of source properties. The sources that fall just below the limit to be considered a CON would then not be qualitatively different from those that are above the same limit. For example, one possibility is that these objects are as obscured as regular CONs, but without a central engine powerful enough to create the environment required for the HCN-vib emission to rise above the limit in our definition. In any case, further studies of these and similar objects may be important for our understanding of the timescales and processes of formation and destruction of CONs.

6.3. Where compact obscured nuclei occur

There is no statistically significant evidence that CONs are found primarily in highly inclined systems, which was one of the explanations for the lack of wide angle outflows in CONs suggested by Falstad et al. (2019). However, it is important to remember that it is difficult to determine the inclination of the disturbed interacting galaxies that are common in the (U)LIRG samples. These systems may also contain two nuclei with distinct orientations that are not necessarily well resolved. Furthermore, the obscuration in CONs typically occurs on scales of ∼100 pc or less (e.g., Aalto et al. 2019), and the orientation of this structure may differ from that of the host galaxy (e.g., Pjanka et al. 2017). This will be further investigated in a follow-up project with an angular resolution of ∼0.02″ (∼5 pc), targeting the HCN-vib J = 3−2 transition and the continuum at 1.1 mm and 3 mm.

When it comes to the relative strength of the mid- and far-infrared emission, there is strong evidence that CON galaxies have a different distribution of f25/f60 ratios compared to the rest of the sample galaxies. The majority of the detected CONs, as well as the other sources with detected HCN-vib emission, have mid- to far-infrared continuum ratios smaller than 0.1, indicating relatively cool dust emission. This result may seem somewhat surprising at first, given that efficient excitation of HCN-vib requires intense mid-infrared radiation. However, suppression of the mid-infrared continuum is a natural consequence of the high column densities that are found in CONs. Similar arguments were already invoked by Bryant & Scoville (1999) to explain the low f12/f25 ratios in other LIRGs with high central gas surface densities. The low f25/f60 ratios are also consistent with the greenhouse scenario of González-Alfonso & Sakamoto (2019), where the mid- and far-infrared photospheres are significantly cooler than the interior regions. As these authors point out, however, their study assumes spherical symmetry and no clumpiness. In a more realistic situation, for example with a clumpy medium or a disk-like structure, some amount of mid-infrared radiation leaking out through sightlines with lower column density is expected. An indication that this is occurring comes from the results of Lahuis et al. (2007), who find excitation temperatures of 200−300 K in their analysis of the 14 μm HCN absorption band; this is comparable to the central temperature found in IC 860 by Aalto et al. (2019) from millimeter observations. This leaking would reduce the greenhouse effect, but the radiative transfer in disk-outflow systems as that suggested in IC 860 (Aalto et al. 2019) is complex and requires further study. We also note that one of the CONs, NGC 4418, stands out with a substantially higher f25/f60 ratio of 0.22. This could be due to a larger fraction of mid-infrared radiation leaking out in this source, either because of a lower column density, more clumpy medium, or radiation from surrounding structures such as the super star clusters suggested by Varenius et al. (2014) based on radio VLBI observations. It could also be that the difference is due to different fractions of the total LIR coming from the CON and the host galaxy. For example, we see in Fig. 2b of González-Alfonso & Sakamoto (2019) that, although lower than in less obscured nuclei, the intrinsic f25/f60 ratio of the model with high column density is still close to the 0.22 observed in NGC 4418. It is thus possible that the CON in NGC 4418 dominates the infrared luminosity of the galaxy, while the CONs in other galaxies are diluted by (colder) emission from the host. In any case, further studies are required to investigate if, and in that case how, cold and warm CONs differ.

If we turn to the mid-infrared diagnostics used by Spoon et al. (2007), it seems that CONs generally have similar EQW6.2 μm but stronger s9.7 μm when compared to the rest of the sample. This may be an indication that the CONs are distributed along most of the diagonal branch, going from strong s9.7 μm and low EQW6.2 μm to weak s9.7 μm and high EQW6.2 μm, in the diagnostic plot by Spoon et al. (2007, their Fig. 1). This notion is confirmed if we look at the combination of the two values for each individual CON (Fig. 9). Interestingly, the galaxies along this diagonal branch are described by Spoon et al. (2007) as being in different stages of obscuration, ranging from fully obscured galactic nuclei to unobscured nuclear starbursts. This statement is seemingly inconsistent with the fact that the highly obscured CONs are found along most of the range of this branch. This could however, again, be explained by the greenhouse scenario in which most of the mid-infrared emission from CONs is hidden by the outer, cooler, parts of the nucleus. We note that NGC 4418 has the deepest silicate absorption of the CONs, possibly favoring the leakage explanation for its high f25/f60 ratio as the 9.7 μm continuum against which the absorption takes place would be very low in a pure greenhouse scenario (Fig. 2b of González-Alfonso & Sakamoto 2019).

thumbnail Fig. 9.

Diagnostic plot of the strength of the 9.7 μm silicate feature against the equivalent width of the 6.2 μm PAH feature suggested by Spoon et al. (2007). The CON-quest LIRGs and ULIRGs are plotted using data presented by Stierwalt et al. (2013); CONs are plotted as red triangles and non-CONs are plotted as white circles. The shaded and white rectangles indicate the approximate regions of the plot used by Spoon et al. (2007) to divide sources into different classes.

There are also striking differences between the three luminosity bins: none of the sub-LIRGs, ∼20% of the LIRGs, and ∼40% of the ULIRGs in our sample host CONs. This may be related to the conditions necessary for CONs to form, and it is therefore worth examining what sets the three subsamples apart. Along with the trivial differences in luminosity, they mainly differ in the morphologies of the constituent galaxies. While most sub-LIRGs are single gas-rich spirals, the fraction of interacting galaxies, as well as the severity of the interaction, increases with luminosity in the LIRG luminosity range, to dominate the population of ULIRGs (Sanders & Mirabel 1996). If the CON phenomenon is primarily linked to rapid gas inflows we expect to find them primarily in actively interacting systems, and this is consistent with the higher fraction seen in ULIRGs, which are all major mergers. It is also possible that the higher detection rate in ULIRGs is due to the larger fraction of systems with multiple nuclei because the rate decreases to ∼25% if we consider individual resolved nuclei. The LIRG CONs, on the other hand, are often found in seemingly isolated galaxies with relatively settled morphologies, although some of these sources, for example IRAS 17578-0400 (Stierwalt et al. 2013) and NGC 4418 (Boettcher et al. 2020), have nearby companions. In the latter case, the central gas concentration may be explained by a minor interaction with the companion (Boettcher et al. 2020), but the presence of CONs in isolated and undisturbed galaxies raises questions regarding the origin of the massive amounts of gas and dust in their nuclei, which in turn should affect the growth of the SMBH. It is possible, and maybe even likely, that there are multiple formation processes in which the ULIRG CONs are formed in major mergers, while others form predominantly through minor interactions or secular processes internal to the galaxies. This would be similar to, for example, how pseudo-bulges are thought to form through secular evolution while classical bulges are formed through major mergers (e.g., Kormendy & Kennicutt 2004). Detailed studies of CONs, their host galaxies, and the environments of the hosts will be required to determine whether CONs are always formed as a result of interactions or if secular evolution is capable of depositing enough gas in the nuclei for CONs to form.

6.4. Effects of the selection bias

The difference in the distributions of the f25/f60 ratios in the CON and non-CON parts of the sample calls for a discussion of how the selection bias presented in Sect. 3.2 affects our conclusions. The main effect of the bias is to prevent the real fraction of warmer sources that host CONs to be determined. Depending on the value of this fraction there are two main scenarios: either NGC 4418 is an outlier, and in general warm CONs are rare; or there is a second population of warm CONs. In order to discern between the two scenarios, a sample selected for the total infrared luminosity could be observed. This would include an additional 6 ULIRGs, 24 LIRGs, and 4 sub-LIRGs compared to the current CON-quest sample. In the first scenario mentioned above, no additional CONs would be found in this extended sample and the fraction of (U)LIRGs that host CONs would have to be revised down by ∼50% because the ULIRG and LIRG samples approximately double. In the second scenario, the detection rate of new CONs would depend on the actual fraction of warm galaxies that host CONs.

6.5. In- and outflows in compact obscured nuclei

The four previously known CONs in this survey were all included in a study of OH outflows in obscured galaxies (Falstad et al. 2019). Contrary to most other (U)LIRGs in that study, the CON hosts all had positive median velocities, indicating inflowing motion, in the OH 119 μm absorption lines. One other CON, IRAS F22491–1808, was included in the same study, but was just below the limit to be considered a CON with the definition based on the LHCN − vib/LIR ratio. The OH 119 μm lines of this CON are redshifted as in other CONs. One of the other newly identified CONs in this survey, ESO 320-G030, has observations of the OH 119 μm doublet reported by González-Alfonso et al. (2017) under the name IRAS 11506–3851. Similarly to those in the already known CONs, the 119 μm absorption lines of OH in ESO 320-G030 show evidence of inflowing gas in the form of a significant redshift relative to the systemic velocity of the galaxy. The other newly identified CON, IRAS 17578–0400, had an observation of the other ground-state doublet at 79 μm, where the absorption lines peak at a slightly redshifted velocity (see Appendix A). A multi-transition OH analysis of molecular outflows by González-Alfonso et al. (2017) shows (their Fig. 10) that all sources in which the 79 μm doublet peaks at velocities ≳0 km s−1 also have OH 119 μm lines that peak at positive velocities.

At (sub)millimeter wavelengths, all seven CONs in our survey show possible signatures of molecular outflows. At least three of these, those in Arp 220 W (Barcos-Muñoz et al. 2018), ESO 320-G030 (Pereira-Santaella et al. 2016), and Zw 049.057 (Falstad et al. 2018), appear collimated. This may also be true for the outflow in IRAS 17208–0014 (García-Burillo et al. 2015), although its morphology still requires further study. IRAS F22491–1808 has outflow signatures on kiloparsec scales in the J = 2−1 transition of CO reported by Pereira-Santaella et al. (2018). In NGC 4418, a compact molecular outflow detected in low-J transitions of CO is reported by Fluetsch et al. (2019) and Lutz et al. (2020) but its geometry is not known. The final CON, IRAS 17578-0400, does not have any published outflow signatures, but our HCN observations reveal a low-velocity elongation along its kinematic minor axis (Fig. 8). This may be a signature of a minor axis outflow which is directed almost perpendicular to our line of sight toward the galaxy. Possible signatures of noncircular motions are also seen in the ground-state HCN and HCO+ lines in the form of asymmetric line profiles in some CONs. In most of these, the absorptions are stronger on the blueshifted side: Zw 049.057 (Aalto et al. 2015a), IRAS 17208–0014 (Fig. 2), and Arp 220 (Sakamoto et al. 2009; Aalto et al. 2015a; Martín et al. 2016) or close to the line center: IRAS 17578–0400 (Fig. 2), and NGC 4418 (Sakamoto et al. 2013). In ESO 320-G030 (Fig. 2), however, it is clearly stronger on the redshifted side, possibly indicating that the absorbing gas is moving toward the nucleus, which is consistent with what is seen in CO J = 2−1 observations by González-Alfonso et al. (2021). We note, however, that these asymmetries may also be due to lopsided distributions of material in the nucleus rather than noncircular motions. Furthermore, noncircular motions do not necessarily indicate in- or outflows.

An interesting object for comparison is the CON IC 860, which is not in our sample owing to its declination (+24°), but was studied at high spatial resolution by Aalto et al. (2019). In this galaxy, the J = 1−0 line of CO observed by Lutz et al. (2020) reveals no clear outflow signatures. However, Aalto et al. (2019) observe blueshifted absorption in the CS J = 7−6 transition toward the central region. These authors present two scenarios for the morphology of the galaxy: one with a near face-on disk and an outflow oriented approximately along our line of sight, and another where the disk is instead highly inclined and the outflow is closer to the plane of the sky. Although they could not distinguish between the two scenarios, Aalto et al. (2019) note that the first scenario requires additional foreground components that the second can do without. In the second scenario, the combination of a highly inclined disk with a minor axis outflow results in a structure that appears more face-on than it really is. This is similar to the situation suggested by Sakamoto et al. (2017) to explain the CO velocity field in Arp 220. The effect may also be present in other CONs, for example ESO 320-G030 and IRAS 17578-0400, where the nuclear HCN emission is more extended along the kinematic minor axis than along the kinematic major axis (see Figs. 7 and 8).

6.6. Alternative tracers of compact obscured nuclei

Determining the HCN-vib surface brightness requires observations with both high sensitivity and spatial resolution. It is not always possible to achieve both of these, so alternative ways to find CONs are sometimes desirable. With high enough spatial resolution, one possible way to find sources with very high column density is to examine the continuum brightness at (sub)millimeter wavelengths, where the optical depth of the dust approaches unity for column densities of NH2 ∼ 1025 cm−2. This method has been used in, for example, Arp 220 (Sakamoto et al. 2008), NGC 4418 (Sakamoto et al. 2013), and IC 860 (Aalto et al. 2019). In Fig. 10 we plot the continuum surface brightness at 1.1 mm as a function of the HCN-vib surface brightness for all sources with HCN-vib detections. Among the HCN-vib detected sources there is a strong correlation, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of > 0.99. We note that the surface brightnesses on both axes are calculated using the same area, that of the 1.1 mm continuum, effectively meaning that brighter 1.1 mm sources are also brighter HCN-vib sources. In most cases it is possible to use the continuum surface brightness to find CONs. However, one caveat is that the millimeter continuum may also be affected by synchrotron or free-free emission (e.g., Aalto et al. 2019), a problem that gets worse at longer wavelengths. This method may thus render some false positives when searching for CONs. For example, NGC 1068 has a continuum surface brightness at 1.1 mm of ∼1000 mJy arcsec−2, similar to many CONs, but a HCN-vib surface brightness of less than 0.13 L pc−2.

thumbnail Fig. 10.

Continuum surface brightness at 1.1 mm as a function of the HCN-vib surface brightness of the CON-quest sample.

In some cases, for example at higher redshift (z ≳ 0.15), the spatial resolution is not high enough to derive surface brightnesses. Although not completely equivalent, we saw in Sect. 5.1 that the criterion LHCN − vib/LIR > 10−8 selects mostly the same sources as the currently used definition and that it therefore may be useful in such situations. In Fig. 11 we plot the LHCN − vib/LIR ratio as a function of the HCN-vib surface brightness. The correlation between these quantities is weaker with a Pearson correlation coefficient of ∼0.3. This can be considered a moderate correlation and the criterion based on LHCN − vib/LIR ratio may be used when the surface brightness is hard to derive.

thumbnail Fig. 11.

Luminosity of HCN-vib relative to the total (between 8 μm and 1000 μm) infrared luminosity as a function of the HCN-vib surface brightness for the CON-quest sample.

7. Conclusions

We present the first results of a systematic survey of infrared luminous galaxies, called CON-quest, with the aim to search for CONs, traced by strong HCN-vib emission. Our sample consists of literature, archival, and new ALMA data toward 46 far-infrared selected ULIRGs (1012 L ≤ LFIR), LIRGs (1011 L ≤ LFIR < 1012 L), and sub-LIRGs (1010 L ≤ LFIR < 1011 L).

Using our definition of a CON as a galaxy where ΣHCN − vib > 1 L pc−2 over nuclear regions with radii of ∼5−100 pc, we find that ∼40% of the ULIRGs, ∼20% of the LIRGs, and < 9% of the sub-LIRGs, host CONs. It has been suggested that the CON phenomenon is related to inclination, but there is no evidence that the CON hosts have a different distribution of inclinations than the rest of the sample. However, the disk of the host galaxy may not be aligned with that of the nucleus, and high-resolution observations should be conducted to determine the inclinations of the nuclear disks in CONs. One property that differs between CONs and other galaxies is the IRAS f25/f60 ratio, in which CONs generally have lower ratios, thereby indicating colder dust spectral energy distributions (SEDs). This is consistent with the notion that the large dust columns in CONs work to gradually shift the radiation to longer wavelengths, making the mid- and far-infrared photospheres significantly cooler than the interior regions. There is however one outlier, NGC 4418, with a significantly higher f25/f60 ratio, which leaves open the possibility of a broad or bimodal f25/f60 distribution among CONs. The obscuration of the warm interiors by cooler foreground gas may also explain why the mid-infrared diagnostics EQW6.2 μm and s9.7 μm indicate that some of the deeply obscured CONs are instead relatively unobscured starbursts. So far, all CONs have possible signatures of inflowing molecular gas in the far-infrared. At (sub)millimeter wavelengths, however, all CONs show possible signatures of compact and collimated molecular outflows. Further high-resolution observations should be conducted to investigate if and how these properties are connected to each other and to the CON phenomenon. Detailed studies of individual sources, including for example multifrequency continuum observations (e.g., Aalto et al. 2019) or excitation analysis of HCN-vib at frequencies less affected by dust obscuration (e.g., Salter et al. 2008), would also make it possible to better constrain physical properties such as column densities, sizes, and temperatures of the nuclei.

The fact that our sample is based on far-infrared luminosities means that it is biased toward sources with cooler SEDs. The bias mainly affects the LIRG and ULIRG parts of the sample and can be remedied by obtaining ALMA measurements of the HCN-emission in a complementary sample of sources selected based on their total infrared luminosity. This would approximately double the number of LIRGs and ULIRGs in our sample and increase the sub-LIRG sample by ∼20%. If no more CONs are found in this extended sample, it would mean that the fraction of (U)LIRGs that host CONs has to be revised down by ∼50%. Regardless of whether more CONs with a warm SED are found or not, detailed observations of individual sources are required to determine if, and possibly how, cold and hot CONs differ. Finally, to assess the importance of CONs in the context of galaxy evolution, it is necessary to conduct studies at higher redshifts where (U)LIRGs are more common.


Acknowledgments

This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2018.1.01344.S., ADS/JAO.ALMA#2015.1.00404.S, ADS/JAO.ALMA#2017.1.00082.S, ADS/JAO.ALMA#2017.1.00057.S, ADS/JAO.ALMA#2013.1.00032.S, ADS/JAO.ALMA#2017.1.00598.S, ADS/JAO.ALMA#2015.1.00412.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. We thank the anonymous referee for useful comments and suggestions. We acknowledge support from the Nordic ALMA Regional Centre (ARC) node based at Onsala Space Observatory. The Nordic ARC node is funded through Swedish Research Council grant No 2017-00648. S.A. gratefully acknowledges support from an ERC AdvancedGrant 789410 and from the Swedish Research Council. K.S. S.G-B. acknowledges support from the research projects PGC2018-094671-B-I00 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and PID2019-106027GA-C44 from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación T.D-S. acknowledges support from the CASSACA and CONICYT fund CAS-CONICYT Call 2018. G.A.F acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the AYA2017-84390-C2-1-R grant (co-funded by FEDER) and through the “Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa” award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucia (SEV-2017-0709). T.R.G. acknowledges the Cosmic Dawn Center of Excellence funded by the Danish National Research Foundation under grant No. 140. E.G-A. is a Research Associate at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and thanks the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad for support under projects ESP2017-86582-C4-1-R and PID2019-105552RB-C41. This research has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

References

  1. Aalto, S., Martín, S., Costagliola, F., et al. 2015a, A&A, 584, A42 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aalto, S., Garcia-Burillo, S., Muller, S., et al. 2015b, A&A, 574, A85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aalto, S., Muller, S., König, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 627, A147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Audibert, A., Combes, F., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Audibert, A., Combes, F., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2020, A&A, submitted [arXiv:2011.09133] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barcos-Muñoz, L., Leroy, A. K., Evans, A. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 10 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barcos-Muñoz, L., Aalto, S., Thompson, T. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, L28 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barro, G., Faber, S. M., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765, 104 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barro, G., Faber, S. M., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blecha, L., Snyder, G. F., Satyapal, S., & Ellison, S. L. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3056 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boettcher, E., Gallagher, J. S. I., Ohyama, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A17 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bryant, P. M., & Scoville, N. Z. 1999, AJ, 117, 2632 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron, E. 2011, PASA, 28, 128 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chary, R., & Elbaz, D. 2001, ApJ, 556, 562 [Google Scholar]
  15. Combes, F., García-Burillo, S., Audibert, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Condon, J. J. 1997, PASP, 109, 166 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Falstad, N., González-Alfonso, E., Aalto, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Falstad, N., Aalto, S., Mangum, J. G., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. Falstad, N., Hallqvist, F., Aalto, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fisher, K. B., Huchra, J. P., Strauss, M. A., et al. 1995, ApJS, 100, 69 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fluetsch, A., Maiolino, R., Carniani, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4586 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  22. García-Burillo, S., Combes, F., Usero, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ginsburg, A., & Mirocha, J. 2011, Astrophysics Source Code Library [record ascl:1109.001] [Google Scholar]
  24. González-Alfonso, E., & Sakamoto, K. 2019, ApJ, 882, 153 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. González-Alfonso, E., Fischer, J., Graciá-Carpio, J., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. González-Alfonso, E., Fischer, J., Graciá-Carpio, J., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. González-Alfonso, E., Fischer, J., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. González-Alfonso, E., Pereira-Santaella, M., Fischer, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A49 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Harada, N., Sakamoto, K., Martín, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 49 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Imanishi, M., & Nakanishi, K. 2013, AJ, 146, 91 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2016a, AJ, 152, 218 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2016b, ApJ, 825, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2016c, ApJ, 822, L10 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2018, ApJ, 856, 143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2019, ApJS, 241, 19 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Imanishi, M., Nguyen, D. D., Wada, K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 99 [Google Scholar]
  37. Israel, F. P. 2020, A&A, 635, A131 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kocevski, D. D., Brightman, M., Nandra, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 104 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kocevski, D. D., Barro, G., Faber, S. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, R. C., Jr 2004, ARA&A, 42, 603 [Google Scholar]
  42. Krieger, N., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 176 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lahuis, F., Spoon, H. W. W., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 296 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Le Floc’h, E., Papovich, C., Dole, H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 169 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lutz, D., Sturm, E., Janssen, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A134 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  46. Magnelli, B., Elbaz, D., Chary, R. R., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 57 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. Magnelli, B., Popesso, P., Berta, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A132 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285 [Google Scholar]
  49. Makarov, D., Prugniel, P., Terekhova, N., Courtois, H., & Vauglin, I. 2014, A&A, 570, A13 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  50. Marconi, A., Risaliti, G., Gilli, R., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169 [Google Scholar]
  51. Martín, S., Aalto, S., Sakamoto, K., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, eds. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, ASP Conf. Ser., 376, 127 [Google Scholar]
  53. Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., van Duinen, R., et al. 1984, ApJ, 278, L1 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ott, S. 2010, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIX, eds. Y. Mizumoto, K. I. Morita, & M. Ohishi, 434, 139 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pérault, M. 1987, Ph.D. Thesis, Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Paris VII, France [Google Scholar]
  56. Pereira-Santaella, M., Colina, L., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A81 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pereira-Santaella, M., Colina, L., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A171 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pjanka, P., Greene, J. E., Seth, A. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 165 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Poglitsch, A., Waelkens, C., Geis, N., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ricci, C., Bauer, F. E., Treister, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1273 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rujopakarn, W., Rieke, G. H., Eisenstein, D. J., & Juneau, S. 2011, ApJ, 726, 93 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sakamoto, K., Wang, J., Wiedner, M. C., et al. 2008, ApJ, 684, 957 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, L104 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Evans, A. S., Wiedner, M. C., & Wilner, D. J. 2010, ApJ, 725, L228 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Costagliola, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 42 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Barcos-Muñoz, L., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 14 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Salter, C. J., Ghosh, T., Catinella, B., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 389 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sanders, D. B., & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J. A., & Soifer, B. T. 2003, AJ, 126, 1607 [Google Scholar]
  71. Scholz, F. W., & Stephens, M. A. 1987, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 82, 918 [Google Scholar]
  72. Scoville, N., Murchikova, L., Walter, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 66 [Google Scholar]
  73. Solomon, P. M., & Vanden Bout, P. A. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 677 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. Spoon, H. W. W., Marshall, J. A., Houck, J. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, L49 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. Stierwalt, S., Armus, L., Surace, J. A., et al. 2013, ApJS, 206, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Strauss, M. A., Huchra, J. P., Davis, M., et al. 1992, ApJS, 83, 29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tacchella, S., Carollo, C. M., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. Varenius, E., Conway, J. E., Martí-Vidal, I., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  79. Veilleux, S., Meléndez, M., Sturm, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ziurys, L. M., & Turner, B. E. 1986, ApJ, 300, L19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zolotov, A., Dekel, A., Mandelker, N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2327 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Appendix A: Herschel OH detection in IRAS 17578–0400

One of the newly identified CONs, IRAS 17578–0400, also had observations of the OH ground-state doublet at 79 μm taken with the Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS; Poglitsch et al. 2010) on the Herschel Space Observatory (Pilbratt et al. 2010). The observations (obsid: 1342239716, PI: L. Armus) were conducted on 2012 February 25 with the high spectral sampling, range spectroscopy mode for a duration of 1176 s and the data were processed with version 14.2 of the standard pipeline. The nuclear far-infrared emission of IRAS 17578-0400 is spatially unresolved in the central 9.4″ (∼3 kpc) spaxel of the PACS 5 × 5 spaxel array. As the central PACS spaxel is smaller than the point spread function of the spectrometer, the spectrum was extracted using the point source correction task in the Herschel interactive processing environment (HIPE; Ott 2010) version 14.0.1. Before analyzing the absorption lines, a polynomial of order 2 was fitted to the continuum and then subtracted from the spectrum. To ease comparison with the OH 119 μm doublets used in previous studies, the profiles of the OH 79 μm doublets were modeled using the same procedure as in Veilleux et al. (2013). Each line was fitted with two Gaussian components characterized by their amplitude, velocity centroid, and width. The separation between the two lines of the doublet was fixed at 0.064 μm in the rest frame and the amplitude and width of the two lines were the same for each component. The median velocity of the absorptions was then found to be 33 km s−1. The fitting procedure was carried out using the spectroscopic analysis toolkit PySpecKit (Ginsburg & Mirocha 2011) and the continuum subtracted spectrum with the fits overplotted are presented in Fig. A.1.

thumbnail Fig. A.1.

Spectral fits to the OH 79 μm absorption lines in IRAS 17578–0400. The solid black histogram represents the data, the solid magenta line indicates the best multicomponent fit to the data, and the dashed blue lines are the individual components. The velocity scale is set relative to the frequency of the blue component of the doublet. The dashed vertical lines indicate the expected positions of the two absorption components given the adopted redshift of 0.0134.

All Tables

Table 1.

Sample galaxies.

Table 2.

Properties of the new ALMA observations.

Table 3.

Results of HCN-vib J = 3−2 and continuum measurements.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Distributions of IRAS 25/60 μm ratios in various samples. Top: histogram showing the distribution in the IRAS revised bright galaxy sample (RBGS). Middle: stacked histogram showing the distribution in the sample that would have resulted if sources were selected based on the total infrared luminosity (between 8 μm and 1000 μm) instead of the far-infrared luminosity (between 40 and 400 μm), with the CON-quest sample marked using a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the RBGS (solid black), the CON-quest sample (dash-dotted gray), the additional sources required to complete an infrared selected sample (dotted gray), and the total infrared selected sample (dashed red).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Continuum subtracted central spectra of galaxies with new HCN-vib J = 3−2 detections. Frequencies of some lines commonly seen in CONs are denoted with vertical dashed lines. In many of the sources, the ground-state HCN and HCO+ transitions are self-absorbed.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Distribution of inclinations in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

Distribution of IRAS 25/60 μm ratios in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5.

Distribution of the apparent depth of the 9.7 μm silicate absorption feature in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6.

Distribution of the equivalent width of the 6.2 μm PAH feature in the (U)LIRG sample of CON-quest. Top: stacked histogram of the CON-quest sample with CONs represented with a darker shade. Bottom: empirical distribution functions of the CON and non-CON parts of the sample. The 1σ confidence intervals are indicated with gray shading.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7.

Intensity weighted velocity (moment 1) map and integrated intensity contours of HCN taken over the velocity ranges 0−100, 100−200, and 200−300 km s−1 from the systemic velocity (∼3080 km s−1) on the red- (solid) and blueshifted (dashed) sides in ESO 320-G030. Velocity contours are given every 30 km s−1. Integrated intensity contours start at 0.24, 0.16, and 0.11 Jy beam−1 km s−1 (5σ) for the three velocity intervals, respectively, and increase by factors of 2.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8.

Intensity weighted velocity (moment 1) map and integrated intensity contours of HCN taken over the velocity ranges 0−80, 80−160, and 160−240 km s−1 from the systemic velocity (∼4000 km s−1) on the red- (solid) and blueshifted (dashed) sides in IRAS 17578-0400. Velocity contours are given every 30 km s−1. Integrated intensity contours start at 0.16, 0.20, and 0.16 Jy beam−1 km s−1 (5σ) for the three velocity intervals, respectively, and increase by factors of 2.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9.

Diagnostic plot of the strength of the 9.7 μm silicate feature against the equivalent width of the 6.2 μm PAH feature suggested by Spoon et al. (2007). The CON-quest LIRGs and ULIRGs are plotted using data presented by Stierwalt et al. (2013); CONs are plotted as red triangles and non-CONs are plotted as white circles. The shaded and white rectangles indicate the approximate regions of the plot used by Spoon et al. (2007) to divide sources into different classes.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10.

Continuum surface brightness at 1.1 mm as a function of the HCN-vib surface brightness of the CON-quest sample.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11.

Luminosity of HCN-vib relative to the total (between 8 μm and 1000 μm) infrared luminosity as a function of the HCN-vib surface brightness for the CON-quest sample.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.1.

Spectral fits to the OH 79 μm absorption lines in IRAS 17578–0400. The solid black histogram represents the data, the solid magenta line indicates the best multicomponent fit to the data, and the dashed blue lines are the individual components. The velocity scale is set relative to the frequency of the blue component of the doublet. The dashed vertical lines indicate the expected positions of the two absorption components given the adopted redshift of 0.0134.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.