Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 621, January 2019
Article Number A63
Number of page(s) 16
Section Stellar atmospheres
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833178
Published online 08 January 2019

© ESO 2019

1 Introduction

Hot, massive stars (≳10 M) have a strong effect on their surroundings owing to their very high luminosities and powerful stellar winds. Upon death, they may trigger the evolution of new generations of stars through supernova explosions.

The Carina Complex (NGC 3372; Fig. 1) is dominated by the very bright and enigmatic object η Carinae, which belongs to the young cluster Trumpler (Tr) 16. Another cluster in this region is Tr 14, harboring our program star HD 93129A. These two clusters contain a large number of massive stars and are responsible for the remarkable incandescence of the Carina Nebula, which is visible to the naked eye despite its distance of roughly 2.9 kpc (Hur et al. 2012).

The former classification for HD 93129A as a single star and its very high luminosity have aroused much attention. The object was classified as O3f* (Walborn 1971) and later as O3 If* (Walborn 1973). Walborn et al. (2002) then introduced a new spectral class O2 If* with HD 93129A as its prototype, thus making it the earliest O-type star known in the Galaxy. Until today, only a few O2 stars have been identified: e.g., 30 Dor 016 and HDE 269810 in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC; Evans et al. 2010).

HD 93129A was first resolved as a binary by Nelan et al. (2004)1, using the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Fine Guidance Sensor (FGS), who reported a brighter primary and a fainter secondary (HD 93129Aa and HD 93129Ab; Aa and Ab thereafter). The binary status was confirmed by Mason et al. (2009) through speckle interferometry, by Sana et al. (2014) using the Precision Integrated-Optics Near-infrared Imaging ExpeRiment (PIONIER) at the Very Large Telescope Interferometer and the Sparse Aperture Interferometric Masks with the Nasmyth Adaptive Optics System (NAOS) Near-Infrared Imager and Spectrograph (CONICA), and by Benaglia et al. (2015) with long baseline interferometry. With a brightness contrast of ΔmV = 0.9 mag that has been confirmed multiple times in previous observations, the secondary star provides about one-third of the overall flux in the optical. Four faint nearby stars were found in the immediate vicinity of HD 93129A: HD 93129C (Mason et al. 2009; Sana et al. 2010), E, F, and G (Sana et al. 2014). By reanalyzing older HST FGS observations, Benaglia et al. (2015) made a first estimation of the binary orbit. It was found to be very eccentric and/or seen under high inclination. The orbital period is estimated to be > 100 yr. del Palacio et al. (2016) modeled the colliding wind region of the binary and suggested a low orbital inclination of i < 30°. Interferometry shows that both stars are approaching each other. The most recently derived separation between Aa and Ab is 26.5 mas (Sana et al. 2014), which corresponds to a separation of 78.2 AU at a distance of 2.9 kpc (Hur et al. 2012). The periastron passage was predicted to occur in late 2017 or early 2018 (Benaglia et al. 2015; Maíz Apellániz et al. 2017).

Based on early non-LTE model atmospheres, Simon et al. (1983) analyzed a spectrum of HD 93129A by fitting several optical lines. The most extensive analysis so far has been published by Taresch et al. (1997). Using International UV Explorer (IUE) and Orbiting and Retrievable Far and Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrometer (ORFEUS) spectra, they analyzed a wide wavelength range in the(far-) UV together with selected optical lines. The authors of both analyses were not yet aware of the binary nature of this object. Even the most recent analysis by Repolust et al. (2004) did not account for its binarity.

Using sophisticated extraction techniques, Maíz Apellániz et al. (2017) disentangled the spectra of the two components in an optical HST observation. An investigation of the spectra made them realize that the primary itself might have two components. We critically discuss this hypothesis in Sect. 6. Given the uncertain nature of the third component, a three-component analysis cannot be performed unambiguously with our data (see question in Sect. 6). We therefore treat the system as a binary in our study.

We perform a first consistent spectroscopic non-local thermal equilibrium (LTE) analysis of the two components of the binary system. We use the Potsdam Wolf-Rayet model atmosphere code (PoWR), which is suitable for any type of hot stars, such as OB-stars, luminous blue variables, Wolf-Rayet stars, and central stars of planetary nebula (e.g., Hamann & Gräfener 2003).

Two issues make the analysis of this system especially difficult: (1) Following the classification of Nelan et al. (2004), the two binary components are early O-type stars. Therefore, their spectra look similar. This is most likely the reason why previous analyses by Simon et al. (1983) and Taresch et al. (1997) failed to recognize the binary character of our object. (2) The cluster Tr 14, like the whole Carina Complex, is densely populated with early-type stars. At a distance of roughly 3 kpc, the angular separation of the cluster members is small. We show that observations from the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic (FUSE), IUE, and ORFEUS (the latter two were used by Taresch et al. 1997) suffer from source contamination.

High-resolution data with a high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) form the basis and motivation of our new analysis. High-resolution spectra have been obtained for the UV with the HST, and for the optical and near-infrared (NIR) with the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT).

In Sect. 2 we describe and discuss the available observational data. Our modeling methods are described in Sect. 3. The analysis is presented in Sect. 4, and the results are summarized in Sect. 5. The evolutionary status of the system is discussed in the final Sect. 6, including the implications of recently published new observations that suggest a third component in the system (Maíz Apellániz et al. 2017).

thumbnail Fig. 1

Spitzer Image of the Carina Nebula; overlay of IRAC4 at 8μ (red), IRAC2 at 4.5μ (green), and IRAC1 at 3.6μ (blue) on a logarithmic color scale. The dominating stellar clusters Tr 14 and 16 and the two brightest stars Eta Car and HD 93129AB are indicated. The field size is 66′ × 31′.

2 Observational data

The previously available pre-HST UV-data were recorded with IUE, FUSE, and ORFEUS. Figure 2 shows the inner region of Tr 14 centered on HD 93129A. It is evident that HD 93129B (an O3.5V(f) star; Sota et al. 2014) contaminated all previous observations2. Other identified stars in the region that likely contaminate the observations are listed in Table 1. Thus, all available data contain at least three early type O-stars.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Inner region of Tr 14 centered on HD 93129A. The dashed boxes and ovals indicate the apertures of several instruments that were used for spectroscopic observations. The figure accounts for pointing and position angle of the individual observations, except for IUE, where multiple observations were carried out. The dashed ellipse shows that the IUE large aperture adopted a perfect pointing and a position angle of zero. The blue circles identify previously cataloged objects (Table 1). Red circles mark further objects that are not listed in catalogs so far. Background image: HST ACS/HRC F850LP on a logarithmic and inverted grayscale.

2.1 UV spectrum

The Advanced SpecTRAl Library program (ASTRAL; Carpenter & Ayres 2015), an HST Large Treasury Project, was designed for the creation of an atlas of contiguous high-resolution UV-spectra using the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS). Twenty-one early-type stars were selected as representatives for their spectral class3. The characteristics and operational capabilities of the HST have been described in detail, e.g., Woodgate et al. (1998) and Kimble et al. (1998).

To obtain a contiguous UV spectrum for HD 93129A, the complete UV wavelength range was covered by three overlapping spectograph settings (see Table 2). Each range was exposed twice. These six observation were carried out on 23 October 2014 (visit 1) and 6 November 2014 (visit 2).

In Fig. 2 the largest STIS slit configuration used is marked in the center, covering only HD 93129A. Figure 3 shows the used STIS apertures, assuming a perfect centering on the position of Aa. The measured locations of Ab at different epochs are indicated by filled circles. A clear motion that has been described by Benaglia et al. (2015) is visible, but the extrapolated position at the epoch of our observation (2014.8) is covered by even the smallest STIS slit.

The STIS echellograms of HD 93129A were initially passed through the standard CALSTIS pipeline. The resulting files then were post-processed to (1) correct the wavelength scale for small errors in the default dispersion relations; (2) shift the echelle sensitivity (“blaze”) to achieve the best global match between fluxes in the overlapping zones of adjacent orders, and (3) merge the echelle orders to provide a coherent 1D spectral tracing for the specific grating setting. Next followed a series of steps to merge the independent exposures of a given setting, and finally splice the three partially overlapping wavelength regions into a full-coverage UV spectrum. A bootstrapping approach, applied to the overlaps, optimized the precision of the global relative wavelength scale and stellar energy distribution. A detailed description of the ASTRAL protocols can be found on the ASTRAL web site (footnote 3).

Table 1

Stars in the central region of Tr 14.

2.2 Optical spectrum

HD 93129A was observed with the UV to Visual Echelle Spectograph (UVES) mounted at the Kuyen 8 m telescope of the ESO VLT at the Paranal observatory on the night of 17–18 April 2015. To obtain the full wavelength coverage and the highest spectral resolution, the two standard settings DIC1 346+580 and DIC2 437+860 were used, with a 0′′.4 slit for the blue and a 0′′.3 slit for the red arm, and slit lengths of 12′′ and 8′′, respectively. The resolution of the spectra ranges from 80 000 in the blue arm to 115 000 in the red arm. The spectra were reduced with the UVES pipeline data reduction software. Using an exposure time of 12 min for the blue arm and 10 min for the red arm, an S/N of about 200 and 250 was reached, respectively. The spectra are not flux calibrated and were rectified by fitting a low-order polynomial to the apparent continuum.

In Fig. 2 we indicate the larger of the two UVES slit configuration (12′′ × 0′′.4). The used positioning angle was zero for the two exposures and therefore only covered HD 93129A, but E and F are close to the edge of the slit. According to the ESO Observatories Ambient Conditions Database, the mean seeing for the observation night was ≈ 1′′.5, implying that both stars likely contaminated the observations. To evaluate the effect that this had, we consulted the interferometric observationsobtained by Mason et al. (2009). These authors were unable to resolve stars E and F down to a magnitude difference of ΔmV < 3.5 mag compared to HD 93129A. We can therefore safely assume that the contamination caused by these stars is negligible.

Table 2

Observation datasets from the ASTRAL project for HD 93129A.

thumbnail Fig. 3

STIS slits of the observations compared to the relative positions of the binary components. Only the two smaller slit configurations from Table 2 are shown for both pointings. The position of Ab at different epochs is indicated by filled circles (blue: Sana et al. 2014, red: Mason et al. 2009, green: Nelan et al. 2010). The position of Ab may be extrapolated to the epoch of our observation (2014.8), and is obviously covered by even the smallest STIS slit. The centering procedure with STIS would peak on the center of (visible) light of the binary, rather than placing HD 93129Aaexactly at (0,0). This strengthens the argument that Aa and Ab were both entirely covered by all the STIS apertures.

2.3 Photometry

For UBVRI photometry, we adopted the measurements from Vazquez et al. (1996). Their observations were obtained with a spatial resolution of 0′′.45∕pixel and a mean seeing of 1′′.3 and should therefore minimize the contamination from nearby sources. Comparison of their B- and V -band magnitudes to the Tycho-2 Catalog (Høg et al. 2000) taken with HIPPARCOS reveals good agreement. Furthermore, the measurements are consistent with Gaia DR2 photometry (Evans et al. 2018).

The UV photometry was extracted from two HST ACS/HRC images taken with the F220W and F435W4 filter. The data were obtained with MAST from the Hubble Legacy Archive.

The JHK photometry is taken from the 2MASS point source catalog (Skrutskie et al. 2006). We note that the spatial resolution of 2MASS is too low for this crowded region. Contamination of HD 93129B, further nearby sources, and the Carina Nebula itself cannot be neglected. The JHK photometry is therefore expected to overestimate the flux (see Fig. 4). The photometry we used for our analysis is summarized in Table 3.

3 PoWR model atmospheres

To analyze the observed spectra, we fit them with synthetic spectra calculated with the Potsdam Wolf-Rayet (PoWR) model atmospherescode. The PoWR code solves the non-LTE comoving frame radiative transfer equations for a spherically expanding atmosphere simultaneously with the statistical equilibrium equations. At the same time, it accounts for energy conservation. More details of the code can be found in Hamann & Koesterke (1998), Gräfener et al. (2002), and Sander et al. (2015).

The inner boundary of the model atmosphere is set at a Rosseland-mean continuum optical depth of τRoss = 20 and defines the stellar radius R*. The stellar temperature T* refers to R* and the luminosity L via the Stefan–Boltzmann law. Since the models for this paper are for winds that are optically thin in the continuum, T* is almost identical to T2∕3, which refers to the radius where the Rosseland optical depth has dropped to two-thirds.

For the expanding part of the atmosphere, the velocity field is prescribed in the form of a β-law, where the exponent β and the terminal velocity v are free parameters. The mass-loss rate that we determine is another free parameter. Together with the velocity field, it defines the density stratification through the equation of continuity. In the subsonic part of the atmosphere, the density stratification is modeled such that it approaches hydrostatic equilibrium. When solving the hydrostatic equation, we take special care to account for the radiation pressure consistently (Sander et al. 2015). The surface gravity log g is a fundamental parameter for the quasi-hydrostatic part of the model atmosphere.

Microturbulence also has some impact on the density structure (through turbulence pressure), but it affects the line formation in particular. In the formal integral, we specify the micoturbulent velocity by its minimum value vmic in the photosphere and a contribution that grows proportional to the wind velocity (see also Shenar et al. 2015).

Wind inhomogeneities are accounted for in the microclumping approximation, that is, under the assumption that all clumps are optically thin at all frequencies. The density in the clumps is enhanced by a factor D compared to a homogeneous wind with the same mass-loss rate, while the interclump space is assumed to be void. There are indications that clumps exist already at or very close to the photosphere (Cantiello et al. 2009; Torrejón et al. 2015). However, we assume that the clumping factor grows from 1 (unclumped) at the photosphere and reaches its maximum value D at v = 1∕4 v.

Photospheric absorption lines show pressure-broadened profiles. Fitting their wings is the main diagnostic for the star’s gravity log g. Pressure broadening is taken into account in the formal integral of the radiative transfer equation, which yields the emergent spectrum in the observer’s frame.

The rotational broadening of photospheric lines can be simulated by convolving the emergent flux spectrum with a semi-ellipse. For lines formed in the stellar wind, however, this is a poor approximation. Therefore, we performed a full 3D integration (Shenar et al. 2014), assuming co-rotation of the photosphere (τRoss > 2∕3) and conservation of angular momentum in the wind.

The models calculated for this paper account for complex model atoms of H, He, C, N, O, Si, P, and S. Iron group elements are treated with the superlevel approximation (Gräfener et al. 2002). A list of the included ions as well as the number of accounted levels and line transitions is given in Table 4.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Comparison of the observed flux-calibrated UV spectrum (blue solid line) and the photometry (blue boxes with magnitudes imprinted) to the combined, diluted, and reddened synthetic SED (red solid line). The SEDs of the individual components are indicated by the green dash-dotted line (primary) and the brown dotted line (secondary), respectively. The excess in the IR is due to contamination of the 2MASS photometry by nearby stars, and thus only provides upper limits. The Gaia G and the Johnson R photometry overlap. For visibility, the Gaia photometry box is shifted. The black box and arrow indicate its actual position.

4 Analysis

The analysis of binaries typically takes advantage of Doppler shifts that are caused by the orbital motion, which can be used to distinguish between or disentangle the components in a time series of observations (e.g., Almeida et al. 2017; Shenar et al. 2017). However, because of the large separation between Aa and Ab and the long orbital period, their radial velocities hardly changed over the time covered by observations. The primary and secondary both have early spectral types (O2 and O3.5, as assumed by Nelan et al. 2004), which means that they show similar spectra. If we wish to perform a consistent analysis that fully accounts for the binary character, we need to identify spectral features that can be unambiguously attributed to the individual components. For an initial guess on the stellar parameters, we adopted the results from Taresch et al. (1997) for the primary and the calibration from Martins et al. (2005) for the secondary based on its spectral type.

Table 3

Photometric measurements of HD 93129A.

4.1 Brightness ratio and absolute magnitudes

A key ingredient for the analysis and the decomposition of the individual components spectra is the brightness ratio. With the V -band photometry V = 7.3 mag and the V -band brightness ratio, given as ΔmV = 0.9 mag (Nelan et al. 2004), we can calculate the component brightnesses. Hur et al. (2012) used main-sequence fitting to derive distance and reddening toward Tr 14. They derived a distance of d = 2.9 kpc, corresponding to a distance modulus μ = 12.3 mag.

This distance agrees well with the parallax measured by Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration 2016, 2018; Luri et al. 2018)5, which corresponds to a distance of d= 2.8 0.2 +0.3 $d=2.8^{&#x002B;0.3}_{-0.2}$ kpc (Bailer-Jones et al. 2018).

For the interstellar reddening, Hur et al. (2012) suggested two components. One part accounts for the interstellar medium (ISM) with E BV ISM =0.36 $E_{B-V}^{\text{ISM}}=0.36$ mag. For this foreground extinction, we adopted a total-to-selective extinction ratio of R V ISM =3.0 $R_{V}^{\text{ISM}}=3.0$ as typical for the solar neighborhood (Guetter & Vrba 1989). The second part is an intracluster component with a total-to-selective extinction ratio of R V cluster =4.4 $R_{V}^{\text{cluster}}=4.4$. The cluster reddening E BV cluster $E_{B-V}^{\text{cluster}}$ is treated as a free parameter.

To determine E BV cluster $E_{B-V}^{\text{cluster}}$, we calculated stellar atmosphere models and combined the spectral energy distributions (SED) of the components. PoWR provides us with absolute fluxes for the spectra. These fluxes were then diluted according to μ and reddened using the composed reddening law as described above. At this point, we have three free parameters, the individual component luminosities and E BV cluster $E_{B-V}^{\text{cluster}}$. The binary total brightness and the brightness ratio place constraints on the luminosities. The flux-calibrated UV spectrum determines the reddening parameter. We fit the combined SED to the photometry and the flux-calibrated HST UV spectrum, as demonstrated in Fig. 4. We tested the reddening laws by Seaton (1979), Cardelli et al. (1989), and Fitzpatrick (1999). The best fit was achieved for an inner cluster extinction of E BV cluster =0.1 $E_{B-V}^{\text{cluster}}=0.1$ mag using the law from Cardelli et al. (1989) for both reddening domains. This results in an overall extinction of EBV = 0.46 mag and is inconsistent with the value of 0.54 mag suggested by Walborn (1973).

When our results are applied to the photometry, we find an absolute magnitude of MV = −6.5 mag for the binary system. With a magnitude difference ΔmV = 0.9 mag, we obtain MV = −6.1 mag for the brighter component, Aa, and MV = −5.2 mag for the fainter component, Ab. The model fits are constrained thus that the V band magnitudes of the synthetic spectra match the observed brightness ratio ΔmV = 0.9 mag.

A comparison of the derived absolute magnitudes with the calibrations by Martins et al. (2005) and Martins & Plez (2006) suggests thespectral type O2 IV for the primary and O5 V for the secondary. If we were to adopt the spectral types as assumed by Nelan et al. (2004; O2 I + O3.5 V), the absolute visual brightnesses of the primary and secondary would be − 6.45 mag and − 6.1 mag, respectively. These values are inconsistent with the observations as the total system brightness would add up to − 7.1 mag, which is too bright by a factor of ≈1.5 and shows a too small ΔmV of 0.35. The spectral types we eventually derived from our spectral analysis and the theoretical disentanglement are O2 I and O3 III. These spectral types correspond to absolute brightnesses of − 6.44 and − 6.12 (Martins & Plez 2006) for the primary and the secondary, respectively. These values are similar to those for the spectral types given by Nelan et al. (2004) and suffer from the same shortcomings.

In the rest of this section, we consider the normalized line spectrum in detail. The composite synthetic spectra are normalized to the sum of the model continua from the components.

Table 4

Numbers of atomic levels and transitions that are accounted for in the model calculation.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Observed Hγ λ4340 and He II λ4339 blend (blue solid line) compared to a combined and normalized spectrum (red dashed line) with log g = 4.1 [cm s−2] and log g = 3.9 [cm s−2] for Aa (green dash-dotted line) and Ab (brown dotted line), respectively.

4.2 Surface gravity

Usually, log g* is derived from the wings of absorption lines belonging to the hydrogen Balmer series. As both components contribute to these lines, an independentdetermination is impossible. Within limits, raising the gravity for one star can be compensated for by reducing it for the other one to obtain an almost identical fit. Based on the spectral type O3 V (Nelan et al. 2004), we assumed a typical gravity of log g = 3.9 [cm s−2] for Ab (Martins et al. 2005) and adjusted the gravity of Aa such that it reproduced the observation (Fig. 5), resulting in log g = 4.1 [cm s−2] for Aa. However, given the poor sensitivity of the fit to log g*, we can only constrain the surface gravity to 3.7 < log g < 4.2 for Aa and to 3.8 < log g < 4.2 for Ab.

thumbnail Fig. 6

Observed Si IV λλ1394, 1403 doublet (blue solid line) compared to synthetic spectra for Aa and Ab. In the upper panel, the temperature of the primary is varied, while the secondary’s temperature is fixed at 45 kK. In the lower panel, the secondary’s temperature is varied, while the primary’s temperature is fixed at 52 kK. The red dashed lines always indicate the adopted final model.

4.3 Temperature and luminosity

The main diagnostics generally used to determine the effective temperature of an O-star is the He I to He II ionization equilibrium (Kudritzki & Hummer 1990). An investigation of the available spectral data reveals that the only He I line that is clearly visible in the spectrum is at 5876Å. This is a result of the high temperature of both components. However, as we do not know a priori how much each of the binary components contributes to this line, the He I to He II ionization equilibrium cannot be used to estimate the temperature. The situation is similar for other commonly used line ratios, for instance, N III/N IV. Without a clear indication of the origin of the line, the line ratio is not useful. However, the absence or presence of certain lines can also give constraints on stellar parameters.

Walborn (2006) presented a luminosity sequence of UV spectra for O6.5 stars (see their Fig. 4). The Si IV λλ1394, 1403 resonance doublet is barely visible for a dwarf star, while it forms a double P-Cygni-shaped line profile for a supergiant. A comparison with Walborn et al. (1985) shows this pattern for all subtypes of O stars, from O4 to O9. In the observation we used here, this resonance doublet is only weakly present in the wind (Fig. 6). It is thus apparent that neither Aa nor Ab exhibit it strongly. To obtain synthetic Si IV λλ1394, 1403 profiles as observed, the models require minimum temperatures of T2/3 > 45 kK for Aa and of T2/3 > 41 kK for Ab (Fig. 6). A further increase of the temperatures does not change this line significantly. Another way to obtain the weak P-Cygni profile in the models is by decreasing the mass-loss rates. However, this yields inconsistencies with other wind lines (e.g., N Vλ1238, 42, C IVλ1548, 50, and He IIλ4686). Alternatively, the silicon abundance might be reduced, but this contradicts other Si features in the spectrum and lacks physical plausibility.

At these temperatures, our synthetic spectra predict that all He I, N III, O III, and Si III lines originate only from Ab. The lines from He II, N IV, C III, C IV, O IV, O V, S V, and Si IV are present in both components. S VI is only visible in the hotter component’s spectrum. In an iterative process, where we adjusted both temperatures simultaneously in an attempt to reproduce lines of various ions along the entire spectral range, we obtained the best overall fit for T 2/3 Aa =52 $T_{2/3}^{\text{Aa}}=52$ kK and T 2/3 Ab =45 $T_{2/3}^{\text{Ab}}=45$ kK. We also tested scenarios with different conditions, for example, with the secondary as the hotter component or both with the same temperature. They all led to large inconsistencies for the spectral fits. Figures 79 show the effect of the temperature on exemplary lines.

Fitting the composite SED as described in Sect. 4.1 and determining the stellar temperatures from the line spectra are in fact mutually coupled steps, which have to be iterated to consistency. We finally obtain for the bolometric luminosities of the components logLAaL = 6.15 and logLAbL = 5.58. The resulting fit is shown in Fig. 4. The expected offset due to contamination between our model calculations and the observed JHK magnitudes is obvious (see Sect. 2.3).

As is usually found for O-stars, HD 93129A emits X-rays. We account for the impact of X-rays by assuming the presence of an optically thin, X-ray emitting plasma dispersed in the wind (Baum et al. 1992; Shenar et al. 2015). The X-ray field can in principle change the ionization in the wind. Nazé et al. (2011) found an X-ray luminosity of log (LXL) = −0.8 for our target system. Adjusting the X-ray field to the observed luminosity, we find that an inclusion of X-rays in our final models has no significant impact on the synthetic spectrum.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Observed C III λ2292 (blue solid line) compared to models for Ab with 42 kK (green dash-dotted line), 45 kK (red dasehd line), and 47 kK (brown dotted line). The temperature of Aa is fixed at 52 kK.

thumbnail Fig. 8

Observed He I line λ5875 (blue solid line) compared to models for Ab with 42 kK (green dash-dotted line), 45 kK (red dashed line), and 47 kK (brown dotted line). The temperature of Aa is fixed at 52 kK.

thumbnail Fig. 9

Observed C III λ1175, N III λ1184, and N IV λ1188 (blue solid line) compared to synthetic spectra for Aa and Ab. In the upper panel, the temperature of the primary is varied, while the secondary’s temperature is kept at 45 kK. In the lower panel, the secondary’s temperatures is varied, while the primary’s temperature is kept at 52 kK. The red dashed lines indicate the final model.

4.4 Rotational velocity

To derive the projected stellar rotation, we compared the photospheric absorption and emission lines that originate in the spectrum of only one of the binary components with model calculations for different rotational velocities. For Ab, we chose He I λ5876, which is thestrongest line that originates from the secondary alone. Figure 10 shows the absorption line profile for different rotational velocities of the secondary. We find a rotational velocity of vrot sini = 150 km s−1 for Ab.

For Aa, we used the line S VI λ1975. Figure 11 shows the observed line profile compared to synthetic spectra with different rotational velocities of the primary. We find the best fit for vrot sini = 80 km s−1. This result is consistent with other lines such as N IV λλ4062, 7103 − 7129 and N V λλ4603, 4619 (cf. Fig. 12).

thumbnail Fig. 10

Observed He I λ5876 (blue solid line) compared to composite models with rotational velocities for Ab of v sin i = 200 km s−1 (brown dotted line), 150 km s−1 (red dashed line), and 100 km s−1 (green dash-dotted line), each combined with a model for Aa with 80 km s−1.

thumbnail Fig. 11

Observed S VI λ1975 (blue solid line) compared to a composition of best-fitting models with rotational velocities for Aa of v sin i = 20 km s−1 (brown dotted line), 80 km s−1 (red dashed line), and 140 km s−1 (green dash-dotted line), each combined with a model for Ab with 150 km s−1. The red dashed spectra indicate the final model.

4.5 Abundances

Carbon and oxygen are found to be depleted, while nitrogen is enriched. We obtain the best agreement for an oxygen mass fraction of 0.2 solar and a carbon mass fraction of 0.05 solar for each of the components. These cannot be determined individually.

We are able to determine the abundances of nitrogen for each component separately, owing to the three different ionization stages present in the spectrum. We derive a nitrogen abundance that is eight times solar for Aa and six times solar for Ab (Fig. 13). These results are consistent with the fact that the primary in the system is classified as a supergiant and is therefore expected to be chemically evolved. We do not detect a significant He enrichment from the spectra. For sulfur, silicon, and the irongroup elements, we assume solar abundances and achieve a good agreement. The observed spectrum shows no significant phosphorus lines. We therefore assume solar abundance for phosphorus as well. The effect of iron on the spectra can be seen in an extend region in the UV, where the spectrum shows numerous iron lines, and which is called the iron forest.

An overview of the lines used for the abundance determination of the chemical elements is given in Table 5.

thumbnail Fig. 12

Observed N IV λλ7103 − 7129 (blue solid line) compared to the combination of the synthetic spectra (red dashed line) for the rotational velocities of 80 and 150 km s−1 for Aa and Ab, respectively.

Table 5

Overview over spectral lines used to determine the individual elemetal abundances of the components.

4.6 Mass-loss and clumping

We attempted to derive the clumping factor D for the primary star by comparing the strengths of the absorption part of the resonance P-Cygni profiles, which scale with , and recombination emission lines, which scale as M ˙ D $\dot{M} \sqrt{D}$. However, there are no unsaturated resonance lines in the HST spectrum. The unsaturated P-Cygni lines that are visible in the spectrum are not resonance transitions, and therefore change with D and in a complex way.

When adopting a clumping stratification as described in Sect. 3 (cf. the red line in Fig. 14), the spectrum is reproduced well, while Hα is reproduced poorly. A reduction of the clumping factor leads to an increased fit quality for Hα, but conserves the fit quality in the overall spectrum. The best overall fit is achieved when no clumping at all is assumed for Aa (cf. Fig. 15). However, this seems to contradict various studies that generally find evidence for clumping factors of D ≳ 10 in OB-type stars (e.g., Bouret et al. 2012).

We were able to achieve a good fit for Hα for D = 10 (green line in Fig. 15), where D is assumed to increase with the wind velocity from D = 1 at the photosphere and reached maximum value at wind velocities > 2000 km s−1 (cf. the green line in Fig. 14). When this clumping stratification is adopted, the fit quality over the entire spectral range decreases significantly. This may indicate that the assumptions made here for the clumpiness of the wind are overly simplified.

Because of this uncertainty of D, we prefer to give only M ˙ D $\dot{M} \sqrt{D}$ as our results in Table 6. Thus, the given value is an upper limit to the mass-loss rate, while the actual may be a factor 2–3 lower, depending on the true clumping factor.

thumbnail Fig. 13

Observed N V λλ4603, 4619 and N III λλ4634, 4640 (blue solid line) compared to best-fitting model composition. In the upper panel, the nitrogen abundance of the primary is varied, while the secondary’s nitrogen abundance is kept at six times solar. In the lower panel, the secondary’s nitrogen abundance is varied, while the primary’s nitrogen abundance is kept at eight times solar. The red dashed lines indicate the final model.

4.7 Wind velocity field

The terminal velocity of a stellar wind is usually inferred from the blue edge of the absorption part of P-Cygni line profiles, while the microturbulence defines the position of the emission peak and the steepness of the blue edge. For a binary star, this is again more complicated. In principle, a saturated P-Cygni line in a binary can only form if both stars exhibit saturated lines in their intrinsic spectra. If a difference in v exists, this difference is manifested through a “step” in the composite P-Cygni profile (see, e.g., Fig. 5 in Shenar et al. 2016). Such steps are not observed here. We therefore conclude that the winds of Aa and Ab have very similar (within 100 km s−1) terminal velocities. Similarly, there is no way to distinguish between the microtubulence vmic of stars Aa and Ab.

Testing different values for the β parameter of the velocity law, we find the best agreement with observed lines for β =1.2 and v = 3200 km s−1. This result is compatible with previous reports for the object (Taresch et al. 1997). The microturbulence is assumed to grow up to 300 km s−1 (approximately 10% of the terminal velocity). The same β and vmic are adopted for both components.

For the radial velocity, we applied in principle an individual wavelength shift for the components before adding the spectra. Through fitting line peaks and absorption profiles, we determined the radial velocity separately for both stars. However, we obtained the same velocity for both stars: vrad = 5 ± 10 km s−1, consistently with the results reported by Maíz Apellániz et al. (2017).

thumbnail Fig. 14

Adopted clumping stratification for the models. (10–800) and (10–2000) denote the velocity range in which the clumping is set to grow from a smooth wind (D = 1) to the maximum value (here D = 10). After reaching its maximum value, D is kept constant.

thumbnail Fig. 15

Observed Hα (blue solid line) compared to the final composite model with D = 1 for the primary (dashed red line) and a composite model with radial dependent D as displayedby the red dashed line in Fig. 14 (dash-dotted green line).

thumbnail Fig. 16

Resonance line doublets: observed C IV λ1550 (upper panel) and N V λ1245 (lower panel; blue solid line) compared to the best-fitting model (red dashed line). The green dash-dotted line and the brown dotted line show the flux-weighted contribution of the components Aa and Ab, respectively.

5 Results

Table 6 summarizes the parameter of the best-fitting models for Aa and Ab. The stellar radius R* was calculated from the Stefan–Boltzmann law, while the spectroscopic mass M* follows fromthe radius and surface gravity. Table 7 lists the abundances, and Table 8 gives the resulting absolute magnitudes from our spectral synthesis for the components. Figures 17 and 18 show the normalized observation compared to the best fit, combining the synthetic spectra of the primary and secondary.

Table 6

Parameters of the best-fitting models for Aa and Ab.

Table 7

Chemical abundances for Aa and Ab.

Table 8

Absolute magnitudes from calculations for the best-fitting combination of models.

5.1 Spectral classification

With the decomposed spectra, we are able to reconsider the spectral classification. The preliminary classification by Walborn et al. (2002) is based on the composite spectra and on the extreme luminosity associated with HD 93129A. After the discovery of the binarity of HD 93129A, the class O2 I was assigned to the primary Aa (Nelan et al. 2004). We can now take advantage of our disentangledsynthetic spectra to perform the classification, following classification schemes by Walborn & Fitzpatrick (1990), Walborn et al. (2002), Walborn (2006), and Sota et al. (2011).

Figure 19 shows the optical range that is commonly used for spectral classification. The spectrum of Aa exhibits strong N V λλ4603, 4619 and N IV λλ4057, 7103 − 7129 emission, but hardly any N III λλ4634, 4640 emission, while the Hβ absorption line is partly filled by emission. Therefore, Aa fulfills the classification criteria of O2 If* or O2 If*/WN5 (see, e.g., Mk 42 and Mk 35 in Figs. 1 and 3 of Crowther & Walborn 2011). Since the Hβ emissions is weak, we classify Aa as O2 If*.

In the spectrum of Ab we find the following characteristics: the He II λ4686 line shows a weak emission with small self-absorption, which indicates a giant star. The N IV emission is stronger than the N III emissions by a factor of 2, N V λλ4603, 4619 is in absorption. A comparison to Walborn et al. (2002) reveals the closest similarity to Cyg OB2-22AB, and Ab is therefore classified as an O3 III(f*) star.

5.2 Stellar feedback

The stellar feedback of this exceptional binary is enormous (see Table 9). A comparison to the census for the stellar content of Tr 14 made by Smith (2006) reveals that the primary alone contributes about the half of the hydrogen ionizing photons of the cluster.

Furthermore, there is a large amount of mechanical energy transferred by the stellar wind. For Aa we derive a mechanical luminosity P mech = 1 2 M ˙ v 2 =6.48× 10 37 erg s -1 \begin{equation*} P_{\text{mech}}=\frac{1}{2}\dot M v_{\infty}^2=6.48\times 10^{37}\text{erg\,s}^{-1} \end{equation*}

and Pmec = 5.14 × 1036erg s−1 for Ab. The mechanical power of the binary system thus corresponds to 104.26L.

6 Discussion

To place our results in an evolutionary context, we compared the derived T*, L, and M* to tracks resulting from stellar evolution models. Given the large spatial separation of the two components, we neglected possible binary interaction in the system. In Fig. 20, Hertzsprung–Russell diagrams (HRD) are shown that depict different sets of tracks, with rotationally induced mixing and without, as calculated by Brott et al. (2011) and Ekström et al. (2012). Tracks for rotating stars were calculated with initial vrot = 450 km s−1 (Brott et al. 2011), while Ekström et al. (2012) adopted 40% of the critical velocity, which describes the rotation when the gravitational acceleration is exactly counterbalanced by the centrifugal force.

The temperature and luminosity obtained from our analysis indicate for both stars a position close to the main sequence. According to the tracks, there are two possibilities for each of the components: either the star is very young and massive, or it is of lower mass, but in an evolved state, heading toward the Wolf-Rayet phase. However, we can eliminate the second possibility based on the derived H and He abundances. We thus conclude that both stars are very young and massive.

To derive the best-fitting evolutionary parameters for the two components, we applied the BONNSAI6 tool (Schneider et al. 2014). The best-fitting evolutionary parameters are listed in Table 10. Our results fall within the error margins reported by the BONNSAI tool.

Comparing these values with our spectroscopic results (Table 6), we see that good agreement is obtained for the primary. The slight difference in parameters can be attributed to the fact that the highest initial mass considered by Brott et al. (2011) is 100 M. Their results for luminosity, temperature, and mass are therefore slightly lower than obtained here. Judging by the primary’s derived age and its associated error of 0.200.19+0.51 $0.20\substack{&#x002B;0.51\\-0.19}$ Myr, it seems that the system age is likely even younger than the previously estimated 0.7 Myr (Penny et al. 1993). At this early stage, the primary is still a hydrogen-burning main-sequence star.

While the mass predicted by BONNSAI for the secondary is roughly 10 M higher than derived here, it is well within our error margin. The estimated age is 1.040.86+0.70 $1.04\substack{&#x002B;0.70\\-0.86}$ Myr. This is a difference compared to the result for the primary. However, the error margins of the two estimates do overlap and indicate a system age somewhere between 0.2 and 0.7 Myr. A more drastic cause for the difference might be that these two stars are not bound to each other and their proximity is just a projection effect. Following Benaglia et al. (2015) and Maíz Apellániz et al. (2017), this explanation can be ruled out. It is also possible that these stars did not evolved coevally and formed a binary system as a result of dynamical interaction. This scenario would also be in line with orbital properties, such as the high orbital eccentricity (cf. Maíz Apellániz et al. 2017).

The tracks calculated by Ekström et al. (2012) account for higher initial masses than those published by Brott et al. (2011), while the Ekström grid is coarser in initial mass. Given the young age of the two components, it is impossible to tell whether the tracks with rotation fit better than those without. However, judging by the relatively low vrot sini values derived in this study, the evolution of the stars is probably described more accurately by the tracks without rotation. On the other hand, we found CNO abundances in the atmospheres that indicate rotationally induced mixing. From the qualitative comparison in Fig. 20, we estimate that the initial mass of the primary lies somewhere between 85 and 120 M, likely around 110 M.

thumbnail Fig. 17

HSTobservation of HD 93129A (blue solid line) compared to our best-fitting composed model (red dashed line). The HST data were binned to 0.1 Å for clarity.

Is HD 93129A a triple system?

The recent study by Maíz Apellániz et al. (2017, MA17 hereafter) made use of sophisticated sub-resolution reduction techniques to extract separated spectra for Aa and Ab from optical HST data. MA17 discussed the hypothesis that HD 93129A may in fact be a triple system, where the star treated here as primary (Aa) is itself a binary (Aa1 + Aa2). While Aa1 and Ab are suggested tobe both of spectral type O2 I, Aa2 probably is of slightly later subtype. MA17 presented three arguments for their three-component hypothesis, which we briefly repeat and address in the following in the light of our study.

thumbnail Fig. 18

UVES observation of HD 93129A (blue solid line) compared to our best-fitting composite model (red dashed line).

thumbnail Fig. 19

Normalized, synthetic disentangled spectra for HD 93129Aa and Ab. For clarity, the spectrum of Aa is shifted by one flux unit.

Table 9

Number of ionizing photons emitted by HD 93129A.

Table 10

Model predictions by evolutionary tracks from Brott et al. (2011) with BONNSAI that fit best to our results.

  • 1.

    The disentangled spectrum for the primary component shows line features that are inconsistent with a single star spectrum (MA17).

    While the spectra extracted by MA17 using sophisticated sub-resolution techniques are suggestive of three components, we need to consider them with caution. It is our impression that the disentangled spectra for the Aa and Ab component presented by MA17 show artifacts that might indicate the limitations of sub-resolution extraction techniques. For example, the Hα line extracted by MA17 for Aa shows a round emission profile, while that of Ab displays a peculiar round absorption profile of a similar width superimposed to a narrow emission (see Fig. 2 in MA17). This narrow emission would imply much lower terminal velocities than derived here from the UV lines, and also lower than expected for O-type stars. These profiles potentially indicate cross-contamination of both sources.

  • 2.

    Based onthe orbital solution, a mass ratio of 0.5 between Ab and Aa follows. This is inconsistent with the spectral types (both are O2 I) derived from the separated spectra. The additional mass is therefore attributed to the hypothetical third component Aa2 (MA17).

    In our analysis, the spectral types are O2 If* and O3 III(f) for Aa and Ab, respectively. The mass ratio of 0.5 is consistent with our spectroscopic and evolutionary mass determinations.

  • 3.

    The spectral lines in the integrated spectrum show short-term velocity variations that are inconsistent with the long-term variations expected from the Aa Ab orbit (MA17).

    If a radial velocity curve for the Aa1 and Aa2 orbit can be extracted from these variations, this would be a convincing argument for the triple system. No such orbital solution has been established as yet, however. As a caveat, it may well be that these radial velocity shifts are manifestations of stochastic wind instabilities, as is often observed in massive stars.

Another problem of the three-component hypothesis concerns the brightness of the components. MA17 suggested that Aa1 and Ab have the same spectral type. Therefore, their brightness should be roughly identical. Given that all components add together to an absolute visual brightness of MV = −6.5 mag and that the difference between Aa and Ab was measured to ΔmV = 0.9 mag (see Sect. 4), it follows that Aa1 and Ab would each contribute − 5.2 mag, while Aa2 contributes another − 5.5 mag. In other words, the hypothetical Aa2 star should be the brightest component in the system. This seems unlikely, however, since the absorption features in the composed Aa spectrum (see Fig. 2 in MA17) are only weak. Additionally, the fact that the absorption troughs of the UV P-Cygni resonance profiles are saturated implies that all components of the system would have strong winds with similar terminal velocities. Based on our two component analysis, we find no obvious need to invoke a third compoment to reproduce the observations.

Based on radio emission measurements, Benaglia et al. (2015) estimated a ratio of ≈ 2 between the mass-loss rates of Aa and Ab. If a similar spectral type were assumed for Aa1 and Ab, this would imply similar mass-loss rates for all three components. The radio map by Benaglia et al. (2015) clearly shows the wind-wind collision region between Aa and Ab, but no emission that could be attributed to interactions between Aa1 and Aa2. Cohen et al. (2011) attributed the observed X-ray emission to intrinsic wind shocks without invoking a contribution from colliding winds.

Given the issues with the spectral disentangled presented by MA17 as discussed above, the total spectrum of HD 93129A might still be analyzed by adding the synthetic spectra from three components. However, since the two-component fit presented here reproduces the data at a satisfactory level, the remaining residuals do not provide enough information for an analysis with three components. If future observations were to provide radial velocity measurements that prove the binary nature of Aa, however, disentangling the component spectra might become feasible.

thumbnail Fig. 20

HRDs for Aa (left panels) and Ab (right panels) compared to the ZAMS (solid black and gray dashed lines for non-rotating and rotating stars, respectively) and evolutionary tracks calculated by Brott et al. (2011; upper panels) and Ekström et al. (2012; lower panels), respectively. The blue solid lines depict the tracks for non-rotating stars, and the blue dotted lines show tracks for rotating stars. All tracks show the pre-He burning phase. The positions of the components of HD 93129A from our analysis are shown in red.

7 Summary

HD 93129A is the earliest spectral type binary star known in the Milky Way and served as the prototype for the spectral class O2 If*. However, this spectral class was assigned before it was revealed that this object is a multiple system. A spectral disentanglement is required to place constraints on the spectral type and determine the stellar content of the binary. Because the orbital period is very long, radial velocity variations cannot help to disentangle the component spectra.

We performed the first spectral analysis of HD 93129A that accounts for its binarity. Synthetic spectra were calculated using the Potsdam Wolf-Rayet model atmosphere code for the primary andsecondary, and their combination was then compared to newly obtained high-resolution spectra from the HST in the UV and the VLT in the optical. Furthermore, all previously obtained UV data for this source were proven to be contaminated by neighboring sources.

We achieved a consistent spectral fit from the FUV to NIR and were able to determine the stellar parameters for both components. The synthetic spectra for the individual components allowed us to spectroscopically classify the primary as O2 If*/WN5 and the secondary as O3.5 III.

We find a good agreement between stellar evolution models and our derived parameters. According to these model, the system age is estimated to be ≈0.5 Myr. This system is found to be less extreme than previously assumed. Nevertheless, it provides an exceptionally strong feedback in the form of ionizing photons and mechanical energy.

Finally, we discussed the study by Maíz Apellániz et al. (2017), who argued that the system may be a triple. These results clearly warrant further investigations that might unequivocally establish the presence or absence of additional components in the system.

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. Based on observations made with NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained from the Mikulsky Archive at Space Telescope Science Institute, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. Support for ASTRAL is provided by grants HST-GO-12278.01-A and HST-GO-13346.01-A from STScI. (PI: Ayres). The project has made use of public databases hosted by SIMBAD, maintained by CDS, Strasbourg, France. Based on observations made with ESO telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under programme ID 095.D-0234(A). This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This research has made use of the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. A.A.C.S. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under grant HA 1455/26 and would like to thank STFC for funding under grant number ST/R000565/1. T.S. acknowledges support from the German “Verbundforschung” (DLR) grant 50 OR 1612. L.M.O. acknowledges support by the DLR grant 50 OR 1508. Some of the data presented in this paper were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NNX09AF08G and by other grants and contracts. Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and obtained from the Hubble Legacy Archive, which is a collaboration between the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI/NASA), the European Space Agency (ST-ECF/ESAC/ESA) and the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre (CADC/NRC/CSA). This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC; https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.

References

  1. Almeida, L. A., Sana, H., Taylor, W., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A84 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Mantelet, G., & Andrae, R. 2018, AJ, 158, 58 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum, E., Hamann, W.-R., Koesterke, L., & Wessolowski, U. 1992, A&A, 266, 402 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benaglia, P., Marcote, B., Moldón, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A99 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouret, J.-C., Hillier, D. J., Lanz, T., & Fullerton, A. W. 2012, A&A, 544, A67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brott, I., de Mink, S. E., Cantiello, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A115 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantiello, M., Langer, N., Brott, I., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, 279 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carpenter, K. G., & Ayres, T. R. 2015, in Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, eds. G. T. van Belle & H. C. Harris, 18, 1041 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen, D. H., Gagné, M., Leutenegger, M. A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3354 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crowther, P. A., & Walborn, N. R. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1311 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: II/246 [Google Scholar]
  13. DeGioia-Eastwood, K., Throop, H., Walker, G., & Cudworth, K. M. 2001, ApJ, 549, 578 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. del Palacio, S., Bosch-Ramon, V., Romero, G. E., & Benaglia, P. 2016, A&A, 591, A139 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ekström, S., Georgy, C., Eggenberger, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A146 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Evans, C. J., Walborn, N. R., Crowther, P. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 715, L74 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans, D. W., Riello, M., De Angeli, F., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaia Collaboration (Prusti, T., et al.) 2016, A&A, 595, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gaia Collaboration (Brown, A. G. A., et al.) 2018, A&A, 616, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gräfener, G., Koesterke, L., & Hamann, W.-R. 2002, A&A, 387, 244 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guetter, H. H., & Vrba, F. J. 1989, AJ, 98, 611 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamann, W.-R., & Koesterke, L. 1998, A&A, 335, 1003 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamann, W.-R., & Gräfener, G. 2003, A&A, 410, 993 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, L27 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hur, H., Sung, H., & Bessell, M. S. 2012, AJ, 143, 41 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kimble, R. A., Woodgate, B. E., Bowers, C. W., et al. 1998, ApJ, 492, L83 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kudritzki, R. P., & Hummer, D. G. 1990, ARA&A, 28, 303 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Luri, X., Brown, A. G. A., Sarro, L. M., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maíz Apellániz, J., Sana, H., Barbá, R. H., Le Bouquin, J.-B., & Gamen, R. C. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3561 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Martins, F., & Plez, B. 2006, A&A, 457, 637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martins, F., Schaerer, D., & Hillier, D. J. 2005, A&A, 436, 1049 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mason, B. D., Gies, D. R., Hartkopf, W. I., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 821 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mason, B. D., Hartkopf, W. I., Gies, D. R., Henry, T. J., & Helsel, J. W. 2009, AJ, 137, 3358 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Massey, P., & Johnson, J. 1993, AJ, 105, 980 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nazé, Y., Broos, P. S., Oskinova, L., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 7 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nelan, E. P., Walborn, N. R., Wallace, D. J., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 323 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nelan, E. P., Walborn, N. R., Wallace, D. J., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 2714 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Penny, L. R., Gies, D. R., Hartkopf, W. I., Mason, B. D., & Turner, N. H. 1993, PASP, 105, 588 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Repolust, T., Puls, J., & Herrero, A. 2004, A&A, 415, 349 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sana, H., Momany, Y., Gieles, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 515, A26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sana, H., Le Bouquin, J.-B., Lacour, S., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215, 15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sander, A., Shenar, T., Hainich, R., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schneider, F. R. N., Langer, N., de Koter, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A66 [Google Scholar]
  45. Seaton, M. J. 1979, MNRAS, 187, 73P [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Shenar, T., Hamann, W.-R., & Todt, H. 2014, A&A, 562, A118 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shenar, T., Oskinova, L., Hamann, W.-R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 135 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shenar, T., Hainich, R., Todt, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shenar, T., Richardson, N. D., Sablowski, D. P., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  50. Simon, K. P., Kudritzki, R. P., Jonas, G., & Rahe, J. 1983, A&A, 125, 34 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  51. Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, N. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 763 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sota, A., Maíz Apellániz, J., Walborn, N. R., et al. 2011, ApJS, 193, 24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sota, A., Maíz Apellániz, J., Morrell, N. I., et al. 2014, ApJS, 211, 10 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Taresch, G., Kudritzki, R. P., Hurwitz, M., et al. 1997, A&A, 321, 531 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  56. Torrejón, J. M., Schulz, N. S., Nowak, M. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vazquez, R. A., Baume, G., Feinstein, A., & Prado, P. 1996, A&AS, 116, 75 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  58. Walborn, N. R. 1971, ApJ, 167, L31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Walborn, N. R. 1973, ApJ, 179, 517 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Walborn, N. R. 2006, IAU Joint Discussion, 4, 19 [Google Scholar]
  61. Walborn, N. R., & Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1990, PASP, 102, 379 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Walborn, N. R., Nichols-Bohlin, J., & Panek, R. J. 1985, NASA Reference Publication, 1155 [Google Scholar]
  63. Walborn, N. R., Howarth, I. D., Lennon, D. J., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2754 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Woodgate, B. E., Kimble, R. A., Bowers, C. W., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 1183 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

1

Erratum Nelan et al. (2010).

2

This even holds for the IUE small aperture, which is not shown in the figure.

4

Observation ID: hst_10205_01_acs_hrc_f220w and hst_10205_ 01_acs_hrc_f435w, respectively.

5

Gaia source id of HD 93129A: 5350363910256783488.

6

The BONNSAI web-service is available at www.astro.uni-bonn.de/stars/bonnsai.

All Tables

Table 1

Stars in the central region of Tr 14.

Table 2

Observation datasets from the ASTRAL project for HD 93129A.

Table 3

Photometric measurements of HD 93129A.

Table 4

Numbers of atomic levels and transitions that are accounted for in the model calculation.

Table 5

Overview over spectral lines used to determine the individual elemetal abundances of the components.

Table 6

Parameters of the best-fitting models for Aa and Ab.

Table 7

Chemical abundances for Aa and Ab.

Table 8

Absolute magnitudes from calculations for the best-fitting combination of models.

Table 9

Number of ionizing photons emitted by HD 93129A.

Table 10

Model predictions by evolutionary tracks from Brott et al. (2011) with BONNSAI that fit best to our results.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Spitzer Image of the Carina Nebula; overlay of IRAC4 at 8μ (red), IRAC2 at 4.5μ (green), and IRAC1 at 3.6μ (blue) on a logarithmic color scale. The dominating stellar clusters Tr 14 and 16 and the two brightest stars Eta Car and HD 93129AB are indicated. The field size is 66′ × 31′.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Inner region of Tr 14 centered on HD 93129A. The dashed boxes and ovals indicate the apertures of several instruments that were used for spectroscopic observations. The figure accounts for pointing and position angle of the individual observations, except for IUE, where multiple observations were carried out. The dashed ellipse shows that the IUE large aperture adopted a perfect pointing and a position angle of zero. The blue circles identify previously cataloged objects (Table 1). Red circles mark further objects that are not listed in catalogs so far. Background image: HST ACS/HRC F850LP on a logarithmic and inverted grayscale.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

STIS slits of the observations compared to the relative positions of the binary components. Only the two smaller slit configurations from Table 2 are shown for both pointings. The position of Ab at different epochs is indicated by filled circles (blue: Sana et al. 2014, red: Mason et al. 2009, green: Nelan et al. 2010). The position of Ab may be extrapolated to the epoch of our observation (2014.8), and is obviously covered by even the smallest STIS slit. The centering procedure with STIS would peak on the center of (visible) light of the binary, rather than placing HD 93129Aaexactly at (0,0). This strengthens the argument that Aa and Ab were both entirely covered by all the STIS apertures.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Comparison of the observed flux-calibrated UV spectrum (blue solid line) and the photometry (blue boxes with magnitudes imprinted) to the combined, diluted, and reddened synthetic SED (red solid line). The SEDs of the individual components are indicated by the green dash-dotted line (primary) and the brown dotted line (secondary), respectively. The excess in the IR is due to contamination of the 2MASS photometry by nearby stars, and thus only provides upper limits. The Gaia G and the Johnson R photometry overlap. For visibility, the Gaia photometry box is shifted. The black box and arrow indicate its actual position.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Observed Hγ λ4340 and He II λ4339 blend (blue solid line) compared to a combined and normalized spectrum (red dashed line) with log g = 4.1 [cm s−2] and log g = 3.9 [cm s−2] for Aa (green dash-dotted line) and Ab (brown dotted line), respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Observed Si IV λλ1394, 1403 doublet (blue solid line) compared to synthetic spectra for Aa and Ab. In the upper panel, the temperature of the primary is varied, while the secondary’s temperature is fixed at 45 kK. In the lower panel, the secondary’s temperature is varied, while the primary’s temperature is fixed at 52 kK. The red dashed lines always indicate the adopted final model.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Observed C III λ2292 (blue solid line) compared to models for Ab with 42 kK (green dash-dotted line), 45 kK (red dasehd line), and 47 kK (brown dotted line). The temperature of Aa is fixed at 52 kK.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Observed He I line λ5875 (blue solid line) compared to models for Ab with 42 kK (green dash-dotted line), 45 kK (red dashed line), and 47 kK (brown dotted line). The temperature of Aa is fixed at 52 kK.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Observed C III λ1175, N III λ1184, and N IV λ1188 (blue solid line) compared to synthetic spectra for Aa and Ab. In the upper panel, the temperature of the primary is varied, while the secondary’s temperature is kept at 45 kK. In the lower panel, the secondary’s temperatures is varied, while the primary’s temperature is kept at 52 kK. The red dashed lines indicate the final model.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

Observed He I λ5876 (blue solid line) compared to composite models with rotational velocities for Ab of v sin i = 200 km s−1 (brown dotted line), 150 km s−1 (red dashed line), and 100 km s−1 (green dash-dotted line), each combined with a model for Aa with 80 km s−1.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11

Observed S VI λ1975 (blue solid line) compared to a composition of best-fitting models with rotational velocities for Aa of v sin i = 20 km s−1 (brown dotted line), 80 km s−1 (red dashed line), and 140 km s−1 (green dash-dotted line), each combined with a model for Ab with 150 km s−1. The red dashed spectra indicate the final model.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 12

Observed N IV λλ7103 − 7129 (blue solid line) compared to the combination of the synthetic spectra (red dashed line) for the rotational velocities of 80 and 150 km s−1 for Aa and Ab, respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 13

Observed N V λλ4603, 4619 and N III λλ4634, 4640 (blue solid line) compared to best-fitting model composition. In the upper panel, the nitrogen abundance of the primary is varied, while the secondary’s nitrogen abundance is kept at six times solar. In the lower panel, the secondary’s nitrogen abundance is varied, while the primary’s nitrogen abundance is kept at eight times solar. The red dashed lines indicate the final model.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 14

Adopted clumping stratification for the models. (10–800) and (10–2000) denote the velocity range in which the clumping is set to grow from a smooth wind (D = 1) to the maximum value (here D = 10). After reaching its maximum value, D is kept constant.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 15

Observed Hα (blue solid line) compared to the final composite model with D = 1 for the primary (dashed red line) and a composite model with radial dependent D as displayedby the red dashed line in Fig. 14 (dash-dotted green line).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 16

Resonance line doublets: observed C IV λ1550 (upper panel) and N V λ1245 (lower panel; blue solid line) compared to the best-fitting model (red dashed line). The green dash-dotted line and the brown dotted line show the flux-weighted contribution of the components Aa and Ab, respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 17

HSTobservation of HD 93129A (blue solid line) compared to our best-fitting composed model (red dashed line). The HST data were binned to 0.1 Å for clarity.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 18

UVES observation of HD 93129A (blue solid line) compared to our best-fitting composite model (red dashed line).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 19

Normalized, synthetic disentangled spectra for HD 93129Aa and Ab. For clarity, the spectrum of Aa is shifted by one flux unit.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 20

HRDs for Aa (left panels) and Ab (right panels) compared to the ZAMS (solid black and gray dashed lines for non-rotating and rotating stars, respectively) and evolutionary tracks calculated by Brott et al. (2011; upper panels) and Ekström et al. (2012; lower panels), respectively. The blue solid lines depict the tracks for non-rotating stars, and the blue dotted lines show tracks for rotating stars. All tracks show the pre-He burning phase. The positions of the components of HD 93129A from our analysis are shown in red.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.