Issue |
A&A
Volume 642, October 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A134 | |
Number of page(s) | 21 | |
Section | Stellar structure and evolution | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037714 | |
Published online | 13 October 2020 |
The various accretion modes of AM Herculis: Clues from multi-wavelength observations in high accretion states⋆
Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
e-mail: aschwope@aip.de
Received:
12
February
2020
Accepted:
6
August
2020
We report on XMM-Newton and NuSTAR X-ray observations of the prototypical polar, AM Herculis, supported by ground-based photometry and spectroscopy, all obtained in high accretion states. In 2005, AM Herculis was in its regular mode of accretion, showing a self-eclipse of the main accreting pole. X-ray emission during the self-eclipse was assigned to a second pole through its soft X-ray emission and not to scattering. In 2015, AM Herculis was in its reversed mode with strong soft blobby accretion at the far accretion region. The blobby acretion region was more luminous than the other, persistently accreting, therefore called main region. Hard X-rays from the main region did not show a self-eclipse indicating a pronounced migration of the accretion footpoint. Extended phases of soft X-ray extinction through absorption in interbinary matter were observed for the first time in AM Herculis. The spectral parameters of a large number of individual soft flares could be derived. Simultaneous NuSTAR observations in the reversed mode of accretion revealed clear evidence for Compton reflection of radiation from the main pole at the white dwarf surface. This picture is supported by the trace of the Fe resonance line at 6.4 keV through the whole orbit. Highly ionized oxygen lines observed with the Reflection Grating Spectrometer (RGS) were tentatively located at the bottom of the accretion column, although the implied densities are quite different from expectations. In the regular mode of accretion, the phase-dependent modulations in the ultraviolet (UV) are explained with projection effects of an accretion-heated spot at the prime pole. In the reversed mode projection effects cannot be recognized. The light curves reveal an extra source of UV radiation and extended UV absorbing dips. An Hα Doppler map obtained contemporaneously with the NuSTAR and XMM-Newton observations in 2015 lacks the typical narrow emission line from the donor star but reveals emission from an accretion curtain in all velocity quadrants, indicating widely dispersed matter in the magnetosphere.
Key words: novae, cataclysmic variables / stars: individual: AM Herculis / X-rays: binaries
Based on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA member states and NASA. Based on data obtained with the STELLA robotic telescopes in Tenerife, an AIP (Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam) facility jointly operated by AIP and IAC (Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias). Based on observations collected at the Centro Astronómico Hispano Alemán (CAHA) at Calar Alto, operated jointly by the Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie and the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC). Based also on the effort of 35 amateurs distributed worldwide, and organized by the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) who contributed photometric observations.
© ESO 2020
1. Introduction
AM Herculis is the prototype of its class of magnetic cataclysmic binaries, also dubbed the polars (Cropper 1990). A polar consists of an accreting strongly magnetic white dwarf (typically labeled as the primary) and a late-type secondary star, the donor, that loses matter through the inner Lagrangian point. The magnetic field of the white dwarf keeps both stars in synchronous rotation and prevents the formation of an accretion disk, but guides the accreted matter toward the polar accretion regions where it is instrumental in releasing the gravitational energy in the form of cyclotron radiation in the infrared, optical, and ultraviolet spectral ranges.
AM Herculis was among the brightest X-ray sources in the sky and was already among the 125 sources reported in the second Uhuru catalog (Giacconi et al. 1972). A composite spectrum with a low- and a high-temperature component (or a steep and a flat spectral component) was already found from OSO-8 observations performed in 1975 (Bunner 1978) and ultraviolet observations with the International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) appeared to confirm the blackbody interpretation for the soft X-ray flux (Raymond et al. 1979). An investigation based on HEAO 1 observations accumulated in 1978 revealed evidence for a white-dwarf reflected X-ray component and unrelated soft and hard X-ray spectral components (Rothschild et al. 1981), later confirmed by a timing analysis of Einstein observations of the source (Stella et al. 1986).
Observations prior to 1983 were mostly interpreted in the framework of one accreting pole located roughly opposite to the donor star, which was self-eclipsed by the white dwarf during the revolution of the 3.09 h binary. Complexities in the polarization and X-ray light curves led to speculations about a second accretion region at the donor star-facing hemisphere (Kruszewski 1978; Szkody et al. 1980; Tapia 1977). A two-pole scenario was confirmed by EXOSAT observations performed in 1983, when bright soft X-rays, modulated on the white-dwarf rotation period, were seen during the hard X-ray eclipses (Heise et al. 1985). Optical light curves obtained in this reversed mode of accretion were found to be surprisingly similar to those obtained in the normal mode (Mazeh et al. 1986). The occurrence of the reversed mode of accretion led to the further development of the blobby accretion scenario originally described by Kuijpers & Pringle (1982) to account for the shape of the soft X-ray light curves and the energy balance in that particular mode of accretion (Hameury & King 1988; Litchfield & King 1990).
Being the prototype and brightest member of its class, AM Herculis has been observed by almost every X-ray observatory. Various aspects of accretion physics were addressed using these data. Of particular interest were the origin of the various emission lines, the occurrence of absorption edges at soft energies, the influence of absorbers and reflectors on the spectral shape, and the soft versus hard emission from the accretion column. Accounts on the energy balance between soft and hard X-ray emission using HEAO-1, ROSAT, ASCA, EUVE, RXTE, and Chandra were given by Rothschild et al. (1981), Ramsay et al. (1996), Ishida et al. (1997), Christian (2000), Beuermann et al. (2008), and Beuermann et al. (2012), respectively. The first X-ray CCD spectrum obtained with ASCA revealed the presence of a multi-temperature thermal plasma spectrum with a superposed Fe-line structure between 6.4 and 7.0 keV (Ishida et al. 1997). More recent Chandra observations with both gratings (LETG, HETG), were intended to obtain a soft X-ray spectral model for the normal mode of accretion and to study possible radial velocity variations of emission lines in the energy range covered by the HETG (Girish et al. 2007; Beuermann et al. 2012).
AM Herculis was in the blind spot of the XMM-Newton X-ray sky at the beginning of the mission and thus did not become part of any guaranteed time program. The geometrical configuration changed slowly and exploratory observations were possible in 2005 (Schwope et al. 2006). These observations were luckily obtained in a brief high accretion state but with non-optimum camera settings. A decent XMM-Newton observation was still outstanding and hampered by extended periods of low activity of the source. AM Herculis was thus made the target of a target-of-opportunity proposal to be triggered by an optical monitoring program indicating a stable high accretion state. This happened during the spring observation window in 2015 and was indicated by sporadic amateur observations, the results of which were reported via the AAVSO web pages1. The high state was confirmed through time-resolved photometry with the robotic telescope Stella-I located on the island of Tenerife. Following this, a multi-observatory campaign was launched involving XMM-Newton, NuSTAR, Calar Alto, and the AAVSO.
The results of both campaigns, in 2005 and 2015, are reported in this paper. We always use the spectroscopic ephemeris
to relate time and binary orbital phase. Phase zero at T0 refers to the inferior conjunction of the secondary star as determined by Schwarz et al. (2002). The phase difference between our convention and the otherwise used magnetic phase is ϕorb = ϕmag + 0.367.
Satellite data used in the current paper are given in TT (Terrestrial Time; which is the same as Barycentric Dynamical Time TDB in the context (hence accuracy) of this paper), time zero refers to TDB = 2451763.453266. The difference between heliocentric and barycentric times was about 0.5 s at August 6, 2000, and is of no relevance for the current paper.
2. Observations and analysis
2.1. Satellite X-ray and ultraviolet observations with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR
AM Herculis was the target of two observation campaigns with XMM-Newton, the first in 2005, the second in 2015. Observations in 2015 were performed simultaneously with NuSTAR to complement the energy range of XMM-Newton toward higher energies.
In 2005 during XMM-Newton (AO4) the whole observation that was supposed to last 36 ks was broken into chunks of about 10 ks. Originally three visits of the source were planned but given the limited visibility of the target at the end of the spacecraft revolution and the potential loss of data due to high background radiation, a total of five visits were generously scheduled by the XMM-Newton SOC. These were performed in five consecutive spacecraft orbits of which all five yielded data from the OM and of which four yielded X-ray data that are accessible through the XMM-Newton Science Archive (XSA) and were used in our analysis.
Details on the amount of data and the camera settings of the high-energy satellite observations are given in Table 1. The table lists all instruments except the RGS (den Herder et al. 2001), which was operated during all observations in standard mode. The data from XMM-Newton revolution 1029 were affected by high background radiation and revealed no X-ray data.
XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of AM Herculis in 2005 and 2015.
In 2015 coordinated XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations were triggered through an optical monitoring program that was indicating a stable high accretion state. This time a long uninterrupted observation with XMM-Newton could be achieved, thus covering 2.7/3.8 orbital cycles of the binary with EPIC-pn/MOS (Strüder et al. 2001; Turner et al. 2001).
Countrate estimates prior to the observations demanded special care to avoid pile-up, for example during phases of extremely soft blobby accretion. Two different solutions were attempted for the two observations. In 2005 EPIC-pn was used in timing mode (killing all soft photons below < 0.4 keV) with the thin filter and in 2015 in small window mode with the thick filter (killing soft photons by reduced efficiency). EPIC-MOS was used at both occasions with one of the imaging modes. It was regarded being the optimized detector for a low state of AM Herculis.
The optical monitor (OM, Mason et al. 2001) onboard XMM-Newton was mostly used in timing mode to generate orbital phase-resolved light curves. Observations through the UVW2 filter in 2005 revealed a maximum count rate of about 20 s−1. It was replaced in 2015 by UVM2 with twice the effective area and longer effective wavelength (231 nm instead of 212 nm) revealing up to 60 s−1. In 2015 also four UV-grism spectra were obtained with integration times between 3200 and 3600 s.
NuSTAR is in a low Earth orbit and continuous observations of a target are not possible (Harrison et al. 2013). Observations are therefore broken up into smaller chunks. The net granted observation time with NuSTAR was longer than that with XMM-Newton. NuSTAR observations began before the XMM-Newton observations and were finished afterward. NuSTAR observations thus were spread over 29.5 h and divided into 19 chunks. Both telescopes of the spacecraft delivered science-ready data.
2.2. Time resolved optical observations
2.2.1. STELLA and AAVSO photometry
A long-term AAVSO V-band light curve covering the period between January 1, 1999, and June 30, 2016, with launch and observation dates with XMM-Newton (blue) and Chandra (red) is displayed in Fig. 1 (all AAVSO data were kindly made available via their dedicated web-site2, Kafka 2020). From there it becomes clear that the 2005 observations were luckily obtained in a brief active period whereas the 2015 observations fall in the center of an active period lasting almost 1.5 years. Apart from sparsely sampled AAVSO data, the 2005 observations had no support from ground-based telescopes.
![]() |
Fig. 1. AAVSO V-band light curve between January 1, 1999, and June 20, 2016. Launch dates of XMM-Newton and Chandra are indicated by blue and red arrows. X-ray observations with those observatories are indicated by vertical lines. XMM-Newton slew observations are indicated with dotted lines. |
The 2015 campaign was triggered and accompanied by comprehensive optical photometry, mostly contributed by dedicated amateurs who shared their data via the AAVSO web-page. Prior to March 2015 the amateurs reported about one observation per night which indicated an active state. This was confirmed by time-resolved differential photometric observations obtained with the STELLA-telescope equipped with WiFSIP (Strassmeier et al. 2004). These were performed between March 27 and April 8 (see Table 2 for details) with a time resolution of 30 s through a V-filter and revealed an orbital variability between 13.8 mag and 12.8 mag. Based on the stability of the optical photometric light curves the satellite observations with NuSTAR and XMM-Newton were triggered and eventually scheduled for April 6. The AAVSO amateurs were asked for supporting observations through BVRI filters in the time period April 2 to April 16 (AAVSO alert notice 517). Further STELLA-photometry was requested before, at, and after the date of the satellite observations to monitor optical brightness changes with highest possible cadence. The mean light curve of all STELLA V-band data is displayed in Fig. 2 and illustrates the large dispersion of the individual data points around the mean behavior.
![]() |
Fig. 2. V-band photometry obtained with STELLA/WiFSIP between March 27 and April 8, 2015. Shown is the average behavior binned into 100 phase bins (red line) on the background of the 3200 individual photometric data points illustrating the variability of the source. The typical photometric error is 0.005 mag. |
STELLA photometry of AM Herculis in March and April 2015.
In response to the AAVSO alert notice, 35 AAVSO observers took part in the campaign. Between April 2 and 16 more than 15 700 individual measurements were reported. During the time interval when XMM-Newton and NuSTAR were observing, six AAVSO observers from the US, the UK, Spain and Canada could support the space-based observations with 1534 photometric data points. The phase-folded AAVSO data obtained in BVRI filters are displayed in Fig. 3. By far the largest data set was obtained through the V-filter (more than 15 000 measurements), while of order 200 measurements were obtained each through B, R, and I filters. A primary orbital minimum was observed consistently between ϕ = 0.95−1.0. The shorter the filter wavelength, the more symmetric the light curves become. The I and R light curves peak at phase ϕ = 0.3, the V-band light curve at ϕ = 0.35 and the B-band light curve at phase 0.4.
![]() |
Fig. 3. BVRI photometry of AM Herculis collected between April 2 and April 16 by amateur astronomers and provided via the AAVSO web-pages. The 15037 individual measurements that were taken through a V filter are shown with small black symbols. There are 272/202/202 measurements through B, R, and I filters, respectively, that are not shown individually. Bin sizes for phase-folding the original data were 0.01 for V (green line) and 0.05 otherwise, which are shown in blue/magenta/red for the BRI filters. |
2.2.2. Spectroscopy with CAFE
Following a Director Discretionary Time (DDT) request for ground-based spectroscopic coverage of our granted XMM-Newton/NuSTAR observations in 2015, observations were scheduled at the earliest possible convenience at the German-Spanish Astronomical Centre at Calar Alto (Spain). Observations were eventually conducted on the night of April 18−19, 2015, with CAFE. CAFE is a fiber-fed Echelle spectrograph mounted at the 2.2 m telescope covering the wavelength range 3960 Å−9500 Å with high resolution, R ∼ 62 000.
Half a night was granted to our program and the observations were performed under a partially cloudy sky with nevertheless good transparency and median seeing of 1.5 arcsec well below the fiber entrance of 2.4 arcsec. The observations of AM Herculis began at UT 01:08:56 and lasted till UT 04:21:53 thus covering one complete orbital cycle. They were accompanied with calibration observations to perform bias- and flatfield corrections and wavelength calibrations. A total of 26 exposures were made on target with individual exposure times of 360 s each.
Data reduction was done with ESO/MIDAS using the ECHELLE context. We performed standard reduction steps: subtraction of the bias level, cropping the images, order identification with the median master flat-field and wavelength calibration with the averaged master Th/Ar arc calibration image. The wavelength calibration has a final rms of 0.04 Å.
3. Analysis and results
3.1. Multi-wavelength light curves in the 2005 normal and the 2015 reversed mode
The photometric data obtained at optical, ultra-violet and X-ray wavelengths during our campaigns in 2005 and 2015 are displayed in Figs. 4–6. Figure 4 shows phase-folded and averaged light curves comparing the 2005 and 2015 observations while Figs. 5 and 6 are illustrating results of the more comprehensive 2015 campaign. These show the evolution of the light curves in original time sequence from the optical to the hard X-ray regime in Figs. 5 and 6.
![]() |
Fig. 4. From top to bottom: optical, ultraviolet, soft, and hard X-ray light curves obtained in 2005 (left) and 2015 (right). They were obtained from the AAVSO data base, with the optical monitor and with EPIC onboard XMM-Newton, and with NuSTAR, respectively. Original photon data were binned with a time bin size of 30 s. Phase-averaged light curves have 40 bins per orbital cycle. All data are shown twice for better visibility. The OM-filters were not the same in 2005 and 2015. The y-axis scale for 2015 have been compressed by a factor of 3. The soft X-ray light curves (third panel from above) were built using photons in the energy range 0.2−0.5 keV with EPIC-MOS (2005) and EPIC-pn (2015) with the thin and the thick filters, respectively (see Table 1). The hard X-ray light curves are based on EPIC-pn (2005) covering the energy range 2−10 keV and NuSTAR (2015, no energy selection). Colors of individual data points obtained in 2005 indicate different satellite orbits (2005 data, color – orbit): green – 1027, red – 1028, cyan – 1029, blue – 1030, magenta – 1031. |
![]() |
Fig. 5. From top to bottom: light curves obtained during the multi-observatory campaign in 2015 in original time sequence. Facilities used are indicated in the individual panels. Time bins are 10 s for the OM, and 60 s for EPIC-pn and NuSTAR, respectively. |
![]() |
Fig. 6. Energy-dependent EPIC-pn X-ray and OM UV light curves of the 2015 observation obtained with XMM-Newton. Time bins are 10 s for the UV and 60 s for the X-ray spectral range. The horizontal bars in the upper panel indicate the length and the mean brightness between 2200 and 2400 Å of the four grism spectra. Spectral flux density was converted to count rate using the conversion factor given in the XMM-Newton users handbook. |
In 2005 AM Herculis was encountered in its regular accretion mode with one dominating accretion region (loosely referred to as the accreting pole) giving rise to a bright phase at UV, soft, and hard X-ray energies. The satellite data display a large scatter around the average behavior. The scattering amplitude is energy-dependent and stronger at soft than at hard X-ray wavelengths. The mean X-ray light curves in hard and soft X-rays are similar in shape but are not identical. The hard X-ray light curve is more symmetric with a maximum centered on phase zero (as the UV) whereas the soft X-ray light curve is more skewed. The rise to the bright phase is steeper than the fall, and the orbital maximum occurs at phase ∼0.85. The X-ray minimum phase lasts from phase 0.42−0.58 but has no defined sharp edges. It is usually interpreted as self-eclipse of the accreting pole by the white dwarf itself. We note that the self-eclipse is not total, AM Herculis is detected at a mean rate of 0.33 s−1 during that phase interval (EPIC-pn, 2−10 keV). The AAVSO data that were obtained occasionally seem to indicate a moderate high state, they remain about 0.5 mag below those obtained in 2015.
In 2015 the source was encountered in its reversed mode of accretion. The light curves are fundamentally different compared to those in 2005. Only the hard X-ray light curve resembles that of the regular mode, although it appears skewed with a long increase and more sudden decrease and with a much smaller pulsed fraction of ∼65%. In hard X-rays, the orbital minimum (“self-eclipse”) starts at the same phase 0.42 as in 2005 but ends already at phase 0.52, hence the self eclipse is centered on an earlier phase whereas the center of the bright phase (phases of half light on ingress and egress) occurs at a later phase, ϕ = 0.03. The NuSTAR (10−20 keV) and the EPIC-pn (5−10 keV) light curves are almost carbon copies of each other (cf. Fig. 5), and they certainly originate from the same region and same emission process.
Strikingly different is the soft X-ray light curve in the softest channel between 0.2 and 0.5 keV. It displays an interval of intense soft flaring centered on phase ∼0.52 followed by an interval of almost complete extinction of the softest X-rays. The onset of flaring seems to be a stable feature at phase ϕ = 0.337 ± 0.004, whereas flaring abruptly ends due to strong absorption at phases 0.642, 0.684, 0.721, 0.680 in cycles 41536–41539, respectively. Flaring is seen only in the softest channel, below 0.5 keV, while the light curves at higher energies are nonetheless strongly affected by absorption (see Fig. 6). In the reversed mode, a second pole is thought to accrete in a blobby accretion scenario (see Heise et al. 1985; Hameury & King 1988). We find it difficult to uniquely determine the azimuth of this second accretion region, because the end of the flaring phase could not be measured due to soft X-ray absorption. The longest flaring phase was observed in cycle 41538 lasting 0.39 ± 0.01 phase units and being centered on phase 0.53. The true center could however occur at a slightly later phase.
In 2005 the UV light curve showed a bright-phase hump due to reprocessing of high-energy radiation, reminiscent of former IUE and HST results (Gänsicke et al. 1995, 1998, 2006). There is nothing like that in 2015; the UV light curve appears approximately flat but is modulated as the soft X-rays due to absorption. Three absorption dips were observed, but the third only partially. The FWHM of the two dips which were fully covered was ϕ = 0.213 and 0.12, respectively. It is worth noting that the ingress into the dips at UV and soft X-ray wavelengths are not carbon copies of each other due to strong flaring at soft X-rays which is not present in the UV.
3.2. X-ray spectral analysis of AM Herculis in its 2005 regular mode of accretion
We begin with an analysis of the data obtained in 2005 in the regular mode of accretion. This serves as a reference for the data obtained 2015 in the reversed mode. In the following subsections we characterize the spectra of the bright and faint phases, respectively, and the UV variability. The plasma emission lines detected with EPIC and the RGS in 2005 are analyzed jointly with the data obtained in 2015 in later sections. The spectral analysis presented here was performed with XSPEC (Arnaud 1996) mostly with version 12.9.1n.
3.2.1. The X-ray bright phase
Only photons in the phase interval ϕ = 0.72−1.20 were regarded for an analysis of the bright phase for both EPIC and RGS. Due to calibration uncertainties of the EPIC-pn spectra in timing mode, only EPIC-MOS and RGS data were analyzed jointly in the bright phase. The EPIC-MOS data, however, suffered from photon pile-up. To mitigate the pile-up effect on the spectra the central region of the target was excised from the analysis. The exclusion radius was determined experimentally by increasing the exclusion radius until the distribution of singles, doubles, triples and quadruples followed the theoretical expectations.
A joint spectral model was developed for EPIC-MOS and RGS data that were spectrally binned to contain 25 photons per bin at least, so that χ2 optimization was applied. It turned out that the MOS and RGS data were discrepant below 0.5 keV which was attributed to remaining effects of pile-up and perhaps optical loading. MOS data were thus excluded from the fits below 0.5 keV so that the continuum at the lowest energies was determined by the RGS.
As usual for polars and AM Herculis in particular, a soft blackbody-like emission component is superposed on thermal plasma emission, modified by some cold neutral and some inter- or circumbinary absorption. The Fe-line complex was found to be resolved clearly into an apparent triplet, the emission lines of hydrogenic and helium-like Fe at 6.9 keV and 6.7 keV, respectively, from the accretion plasma, and the fluorescence line from a scattering source at 6.4 keV.
Plasma emission plus reflection was modeled as the sum of a hot and a cold collisionally ionized plasma component (APEC in XSPEC terms). The fluorescence line was modeled with either a Gaussian or a Compton reflection component (pexmon, Nandra et al. 2007) with similar results.
In XSPEC notation the models used here were TBabs* pcfabs*(bbodyrad + constant*(apec + apec + gaussian)) (model A) and TBabs*pcfabs*(bbodyrad + constant* (apec + apec + pexmon)) (model B) with reduced and 1.064 for 2035 and 2034 degrees of freedom, respectively. Following Beuermann et al. (2012) the column density of cold interstellar absorption (model component TBABS) was fixed at 5 × 1019 cm−2. The partial covering absorption component was found to be important to explain the hard thermal plasma spectra and thus avoid unrealistic high plasma temperatures. Without its inclusion, the hot plasma component hits its upper limit at kT = 80 keV while still not giving a convincing representation of the data (
). Abundances as given by Anders & Grevesse (1989) were used for fitting the spectra.
The following best-fit parameters were determined jointly for the four data groups representing the four individual observations with XMM-Newton: kTbb = 35.2 ± 0.7 eV, cm−2, kTcool = 0.161/0.174 keV (for models A/B), kThot = 14.0/8.5 keV (for a representation of the data and the fit see Fig. 7). Other parameters like bolometric fluxes, the covering fraction and the soft X-ray emission area are given in Table 3 for each individual XMM-Newton observation. The normalization parameter of the blackbody NBB (in units of
) was converted to a spot radius of an assumed circular emitting area at the distance to AM Herculis of 87.53 pc (Gaia Collaboration 2018; Bailer-Jones et al. 2018).
![]() |
Fig. 7. Bright-phase EPIC-MOS and RGS spectra of AM Herculis obtained in 2005 with best-fitting model B. The individual model components are shown with dotted lines. Lower panel: residuals with respect to the best fit in units of σ. Different colors were used to indicate data from the different instruments involved in the fit. |
Bright and faint phase spectral parameters in 2005 for the model TBabs*pcfabs*(bbodyrad + constant*(apec + apec + gaussian)).
The flux ratio Fbb, bol/FX, bol was derived without any further correction due to reflection or visibility. It indicates a mild to a pronounced soft X-ray excess which was found to be strongly correlated with the total X-ray flux, and, while the thermal flux was found to be roughly constant, the soft excess is correlated with the soft X-ray flux.
The plasma temperature was also determined from just fitting a restricted energy range, 5.8−7.5 keV, centered on the Fe-line complex. Thus we used the line strength of hydrogenic and helium-like iron as a bolometer. The model used writes APEC+BREMS+GAUSS and revealed a plasma temperature of 10.3 keV, which we refer to as kTline.
The white dwarf in AM Herculis has a mass of M⊙ (Gänsicke et al. 2006) implying a shock temperature of kTshock = 35 ± 12 keV. For an assumed specific mass flow rate ṁ = 1 g cm−2 s−1 and a magnetic field of B = 14 MG the maximum electron temperature Tmax, e is about 40% of the shock temperature, kTmax, e = 14 keV (Fischer & Beuermann 2001) which is in good agreement with the hot plasma emission component of model (B). The temperature in the line formation region Tline can be regarded a lower limit of Tmax, e implying kTshock = 26 keV. This value is lower than but still compatible with the expected value of 35 keV.
3.2.2. The X-ray faint phase – self eclipse
AM Herculis was sufficiently bright in the faint phase to perform a spectral analysis. Data from EPIC-MOS over the full spectral range and EPIC-pn just for the Fe-line complex in the restricted energy range 5.0−8.0 keV were used for this exercise. Spectra were generated using photons registered during the phase interval 0.42−0.57 for each revolution of the spacecraft individually and combined into one spectrum per instrument.
The spectra were modeled with the same model as applied to the bright-phase data with the exception of the partial covering absorber to yield kTBB = 36 ± 10 eV, kTcool = 0.65 ± 0.07 keV, and keV, respectively, where errors are given for a 99% confidence interval. Derived parameters are also given in Table 3, while the data and the best fit are shown in Fig. 8. Fitting was done with unbinned spectra (with a minimum of one count per bin), the data were later binned just for presentation in the mentioned figure.
![]() |
Fig. 8. Faint-phase EPIC-MOS (main panel) and -pn (inset) spectra of AM Herculis obtained 2005 with best-fit model spectra overplotted. Observed data were binned with a minimum of 25 counts per spectral bin. Two model components are shown, the soft blackbody and the sum of all others originating from the accretion plasma |
The most important point to highlight here is the necessity to incorporate a soft component, parameterized as a blackbody, which hints to a second emission region on the white dwarf (second pole) as its source. It thus appears reasonable to assume that the thermal plasma component also originates form this second pole and is not scattered radiation of the primary accretion region. At the given distance to AM Herculis the normalization of the blackbody reveals an emitting area of just a few kilometers. It is interesting to note that the inferred blackbody temperatures in the bright and the faint phases are the same within the errors. Only the size of the secondary region is smaller than the primary region by large factors. No soft X-ray excess was found for the secondary region.
We also performed a fit to the EPIC-pn spectrum in the energy range 5−8 keV with a hot (12 keV) plasma emission model and (without) a Gaussian emission line representing the 6.4 keV line of neutral iron (cf. Ishida et al. 1997). The fit with the Gaussian line was clearly improved with a reduced (46 d.o.f.) compared to 1.188 (for 48 d.o.f.) for the model without the line but the model without the line cannot be rejected on safe grounds. We regard this result as weak evidence for the presence of the line. Its equivalent width is 0.7 ± 0.2 keV (1σ) which is higher than compatible with reflection but points to an unseen, scattered emitter as in, e.g., V902 Mon (Worpel et al. 2018)
3.2.3. Variability in the UV
In Fig. 9 the phase-dependent light curves in the UV (2120 Å), and the hard X-ray regime are shown (0.4−10 keV), highlighting similarities and dissimilarities of the light curves in the two wavelength ranges per revolution. One observes a steady brightness increase in both regimes at orbital maximum. The individual OM light curves do not display the pronounced orbital minimum that is so remarkable at X-ray wavelengths. The average UV light curve however displays the same shape as seen before with IUE, HST, and FUSE (Gänsicke et al. 1995, 1998, 2006).
![]() |
Fig. 9. Phase-folded Optical Monitor (OM, filter UVW2, lower panels) and EPIC-pn (0.4−10 keV, upper panels) light curves per revolution obtained in 2005. The XMM-Newton revolution is indicated in the upper panels. |
As shown in the aforementioned studies, the phase-dependent photometric variability can be explained by the projection of an accretion-heated spot. A similar model for a heated spot was applied here to describe the OM data. A grid of pure hydrogen atmosphere models was folded through the response curves of the UV filter. A circular spot was placed on the white dwarf and was characterized by its position, its extent and its temperature distribution. A linear temperature decrease was assumed from a maximum in the spot center to the temperature of the undisturbed white dwarf. Since the data appeared rather noisy, several important parameters were predefined. The distance was assumed to be 87.53 ± 0.14 pc. The white dwarf has a mass of 0.78 M⊙ and a temperature of Teff = 20 000 K. Its radius was estimated using Nauenberg (1972)’s relation (Gänsicke et al. 2006). The inclination was set to i = 50°.
At phase 0.5 the accretion spot is not in view, hence the observed data at that phase are expected to contain only contributions from the undisturbed photosphere and the stream. The model gives a forecast for emission from the white dwarf at that phase which falls short of the observed brightness. The stream component was treated as a constant background at a level of Fback = 3.9 × 10−14 ergs cm−2 s−1 Å−1 (Gänsicke et al. 1995) and subtracted from the data shown in Fig. 10.
![]() |
Fig. 10. Phase-averaged optical monitor light curve and spot model. Fluxes Fλ are given in units of 10−16 ergs cm−2 s−1 Å−1. The best-fit is shown with a solid line, the contributions from the heated spot and the unheated white dwarf with dashed and dotted lines, respectively. |
An optimum fit was determined via χ2 minimization. The data, the model and the residuals are shown in Fig. 10. We find a colatitude of 65° (of course very much dependent on the assumed inclination, see the discussion in Gänsicke et al. 2001), a spot azimuth of about 12°, a spot opening angle of 35° and a maximum spot temperature of 66 000 K. The extra flux originating from the accretion-heated spot is FUV = 0.9 × 10−10 ergs cm−2 s−1, the spot covers a fractional area f ≃ 0.09 of the white dwarf’s surface.
Binned hard X-ray (2−10 keV) and UV light curves obtained in revolutions 1027 and 1031 are shown in original time sequence in Fig. 11. The chosen X-ray band covers the thermal emission component from the main accretion spot. Both light curves display strong flickering behavior. Some, not all, of the hard X-ray flares show a corresponding signal in the UV. Hard X-ray flares are due to some kind of non-stationary accretion. The observation of a correlated UV-signal is a direct proof of instantaneous re-processing of radiation in the photosphere of the WD. We underline that the reprocessing component is detected in the UV, not in soft X-rays, lending support to Gänsicke’s earlier claim based on energetic grounds only (Gänsicke et al. 1995). The lack of energy resolution in the UV prevents us from drawing more detailed conclusions as far as the energy budget is concerned.
![]() |
Fig. 11. Trains of binned photons observed in 2005 in the UV (OM/UVW2, red color) and the hard X-ray regime (2−10 keV, blue color). Bin size is 30 s each. The XMM-Newton revolution is indicated. The UV-data were plotted with an offset of −5 and −8 units in the lower and upper panels, respectively. |
3.3. Spectral analysis of AM Herculis in its 2015 reversed mode of accretion
In this subsection the main spectral characteristics of the 2015 X-ray data are analyzed. We begin with a joint fit to EPIC-pn, EPIC-MOS and NuSTAR data to determine the reflection continuum, both in the mean and in phase-resolved spectra. We then fit the full bright-phase spectrum including the lines and use this parametrization as background to model the soft blobby accretion phase. Finally we strive for an understanding of the X-ray and UV absorption dips.
3.3.1. The combined XMM-Newton and NuSTAR reflection spectrum
We extracted photons during the phase interval 0.05 < ϕ < 0.25, called the plateau phase. For EPIC-pn only photons detected as singles and doubles were used and extracted in separate spectra. Following Mukai et al. (2015) we discarded data below 4.5 keV and between 5.0 and 8.0 keV, thus excluding the iron line complex and other emission lines. A bremsstrahlung emission model with fixed temperature at 15 keV was used, modified with the continuum reflection model reflect. This we fitted twice, once with the reflection amplitude allowed to vary and once with the reflection amplitude fixed to 0.0 but bremsstrahlung normalization still variable. We observed that the reflection component gives an improvement of Δχ2 = 437 for 1411 degrees of freedom and a reflection amplitude of around 0.8, a very significant detection of reflection (Fig. 12). Leaving the bremsstrahlung unconstrained gives a temperature of 14.5 keV without significantly affecting the reflection amplitude.
![]() |
Fig. 12. Combined XMM-Newton and NuSTAR bright-phase spectrum obtained in 2015. Model fits and residuals with (blue) and without (red) reflection component are shown in the two lower panels. |
We then searched for the phase-dependent behavior of the reflection continuum. Therefore, we divided all spectra into twenty phase bins and fitted them jointly with a single temperature bremsstrahlung modified by reflection. The bremsstrahlung temperature was kept fixed at 15 keV and its normalization allowed to vary. The reflection component parameters were kept fixed at their default values except for the amplitude, and each spectral group was given its own multiplicative calibration constant. The maximum physically plausible reflection amplitude is unity, representing a flat infinite plane, so we capped this parameter at 1. Thus, the XSPEC model is const*reflect*bremss. The for all twenty fits were around unity, indicating that there is no need to add more model components (Fig. 13). We found clear evidence of phase-dependent reflection, although with large uncertainties with a maximum of one on the rising branch of the hard X-ray light curve and a minimum, consistent with zero, which coincides roughly with the soft flaring interval of the light curve.
![]() |
Fig. 13. Phase-dependent reflection amplitude for EPIC and NuSTAR spectra. Two cycles are plotted for clarity, and error bars indicate the 1σ uncertainty. |
The reflection amplitude for spectra in the phase interval 0.35 < ϕ < 0.55 appears consistent with zero. To verify, we extracted mean spectra for this phase interval and fitted it as above. With a greater S/N, we found a reflection amplitude of to 1σ significance, still compatible with zero.
3.3.2. The 2015 prime pole X-ray bright phase
Obtaining a satisfactory fit to the plateau spectrum (phase 0.05−0.25) over the entire energy range was difficult, and we proceeded in stages. We first constrained the plasma temperatures using the iron lines, fitting the energy range 6.0−7.2 keV with a reflected two-temperature APEC model plus a Gaussian near 6.4 keV. The EPIC-pn, EPIC-MOS, and NuSTAR instruments were fit jointly, with a multiplicative factor for each instrument to account for cross-instrument calibration. We also split the EPIC-pn photons into single patterns and multiple patterns to correct for instrumental artifacts at low energies. Additionally, the redshifts of the reflection and APEC components were allowed to vary between instruments, to account for other calibration issues. The Gaussian’s energy was also tied to the redshift. With the redshifts and APEC temperatures found, we extended the energy range of the fits upward to 10 keV for the EPIC instruments and 55.0 keV for NuSTAR. There were very few photons above these energies.
To fit this spectrum adequately we had to add a third APEC component, a soft blackbody, a partially covering local absorber, and the 5 × 1019 cm−2 interstellar absorber. That is, our XSPEC model was const*tbabs*pcfabs*reflect* (bbodyrad+apec+apec+apec+gaussian). The resulting fit matches the continuum and iron line complex well, with a of 1.18 for 5145 degrees of freedom. There is an unidentified absorption-like feature near 1.3 keV, some kind of emission feature at 2.0 keV, and some discrepancies at the lowest energies that lead to a not fully satisfactory fit (see Fig. 14). Experiments with various kind of standard absorber models to explain the feature at 1.3 keV remained inconclusive. This feature might find an explanation in yet to be formulated complex absorbing structures involving, e.g., a partial covering warm absorber. We think, nevertheless, that we have correctly characterized the important features of the spectrum. The fit parameters are summarized in Table 4.
![]() |
Fig. 14. Bright-phase spectrum (plateau) from 2015 with best fitting model. |
Parameters and fluxes for the plateau phase (0.05 < ϕ < 0.25, top part) and the additional soft flux in the flaring phase (bottom part).
3.3.3. Soft blobby accretion at the second pole
In this section we firstly describe attempts to fit the mean spectrum of the flaring interval followed by an analysis of individual flares. To fit the mean spectrum in the middle of the flaring phase, ϕ = 0.40−0.55, we assume that the contribution from the main accreting pole, as characterized in the previous section, varies only in intensity, not in spectral shape, as the pole moves in and out of view. The flaring events are described as a soft blackbody superimposed on it, that is, a second blackbody in addition to the one already present in the plateau spectrum. We also assume that any non-flaring contribution from the secondary pole is negligible, an assumption we can justify from the observation that no brightness increase during a flare is seen neither at optical, nor UV or X-ray wavelengths (see Fig. 15 for an example at high resolution). The temperature and normalization of the second blackbody were found to be slightly higher than that from the plateau phase, kT = 33.7 ± 0.1 eV). The average bolometric flux of the additional blackbody, without reflection or absorption, was 1.485 ± 0.008 × 10−9 ergs cm−2 s−1. The X-ray flux from the soft component of the second pole is higher than the summed X-ray flux (thermal plus blackbody) from the primary pole. Thus, the sum of the fluxes from both poles is 2.600 ± 0.008 × 10−9 ergs cm−2 s−1, which equates to a mean mass accretion rate of 1.53 × 10−11 M⊙ yr−1. To derive this we used the same geometry factors as for 2005 (see Table 3). The derived total mass accretion rate is within the range of rates covered by the values derived for just the main pole in the 2005 high state.
![]() |
Fig. 15. Flare details in cycle 41538. The soft X-ray light curve (0.2−0.5 keV) is shown in black with 1 s time resolution, the hard X-ray light curve (2−5 keV) at 5 s resolution in blue. Optical photometry is shown in red, the inserted scale bar ranges from V = 13.1 at bottom to 12.6 mag with a 0.1 mag separation between ticks. Three flares are identified and marked by vertical dashed lines. |
To investigate the properties of individual flares and of the underlying accretion filaments we inspected the EPIC-pn light curve in the energy range 0.1−0.5 keV binned to 1 s by eye using TOPCAT (Taylor 2005), and identified 84 distinct events (see Fig. 15 for an example). We determined the start and end times of individual flares, the duration Δtflare, and the time of the flare maximum. The rise and fall times, trise and tfall, were calculated as differences between the start and the end of a flare and the flare maximum. Start and end times were used to generate GTIs (Good Time Intervals) and XMM-Newton EPIC spectra were extracted for each flare individually. They were binned always with a minimum of 16 counts per bin. Then we fit each flare individually, from 0.2 to 10.0 keV, using the model developed in the previous section as background plus a soft blackbody with variable temperature and normalization describing the flare proper. For the background spectrum all spectral parameters were held fixed but a variable multiplicative factor was applied to only allow the flare background to vary in intensity, and the covering fraction was left free.
The results are summarized in Table 5 (mean and extreme values and dispersion for all flare properties) and illustrated in Fig. 16 for individual flares. Given the robustness (or simplicity) of the approach the fits were found to be satisfactory with a mean , although not of sufficient quality in any individual case. Based on those fits a number of parameters were derived describing the radiation properties and energetics of the accreted filaments: the mean bolometric flux FBB, the fluence ℱBB = FBB × Δtflare, the bolometric luminosity Lbol, BB, the emission area ABB and the emission radius of an assumed circular radiating spot RBB, the radiating fraction
, the specific luminosity Lf = Lbol, BB/fBB, the mass accretion rate Ṁ, the specific mass accretion rate (or mass flow rate) ṁ = Ṁ/ABB, an upper limit to the mass of the accreted filament mblob = Ṁ × trise and its length lblob = Δtflare × vff. The derived blob mass is regarded an upper limit since the value given depends on the observed photometric signal and not on any observable of the filament itself (the impact time is likely shorter than the photometric rise time). Similarly one may argue that the derived blob length is an upper limit because it is based on the observed duration of a flare. The derived average specific mass flow rate, ⟨ṁ⟩ = 22 g cm−2 s−1, is certainly a lower limit to its real value. Its value was derived using the emission area of a filament while the accretion area is certainly much smaller. With ṁ > 22 g cm−2 s−1, we are very much in the regime of filamentary blobby accretion where hydrodynamic shocks are buried deeply below the photosphere of the ambient medium (Kuijpers & Pringle 1982; Frank et al. 1988; King 2000; Litchfield & King 1990).
![]() |
Fig. 16. Flares at the second pole of AM Herculis in its anomalous state. Shown are the mean mass accretion rate and temperature of the individual flares against the emitting fraction of the WD surface (left panels), and against the mass of the accreting blob (right panels). Although Ṁ and kT are strongly dependent on the size of the emitting area, they appear to be independent of the mass of the infalling blob. |
Flare parameters derived from blackbody fits to 84 individual soft flares from the second pole in AM Herculis.
The blackbody temperature of the flares varies between 26 and 40 eV. This makes the flares from the secondary pole similar in behavior to those observed with ROSAT originating from the primary pole. Both Ramsay et al. (1996) and Beuermann et al. (2008) found the blackbody temperature to be variable as a function of the count-rate between 25 and 34 eV, the former study from flare to flare, the latter study even within a given flare. The higher the count rate, the hotter the emitting area. We searched for such evidence in our data, in the spectral fits to the individual flares, and within the flares, by inspecting the hardness ratio HR = (H − S)/(H + S) between the count rates in a few bands that are sampling the soft component (0.20−0.25 keV, 0.25−0.35 keV, and 0.35−0.50 keV, respectively). We could not find any systematics in any of the two hardness ratios toward higher temperatures with rising count rate (where the sum of all three bands is used). We conclude that the temperature of the filamentary accretion area does not seem to depend on the mass or length of the infalling blobs. We cannot make statement about variability within single flares due to the lack of photons.
We find, however, a clear anti-correlation between the black-body temperature and the emitting area (see Fig. 16, lower left panel). We also find a weak anticorrelation between the temperature of the black-body and the bolometric luminosity, so that the dispersion of the specific luminosity becomes rather small, log ⟨LBB, bol/f⟩ = 37.30 ± 0.14 erg s−1.
The mass of individual filaments is observed to vary by a factor of ∼50, the length by a factor of ∼100 and the two quantities are weakly correlated. The blob mass does not scale with the mass flow rate ṁ but (weakly) with the accretion rate Ṁ.
3.3.4. X-ray and ultraviolet absorption troughs and dips
The absolute novel feature in the 2015 data of AM Herculis is the complete extinction of soft X-rays at around phase 0.7. More precisely, it was observed to start at phase 0.6 or soon after and was observed to last 0.25 to 0.35 phase units in the softest band (Fig. 6). A similar feature is observed in the UV although there it appears to be considerably shorter in phase. This suggests that the X-ray absorption is caused by two different structures in the binary. The first, starting shortly after phase 0.6 mainly affects the soft X-ray spectral regime and the UV, whereas the second dip is prominently visible up to the highest energies. This high-energy feature displays a variable central phase somewhere between phases 0.90 and 0.98. Soft X-rays are much less affected during that phase interval, and the feature is barely if at all recognized in the UV.
Contrary to past high-state observations (see Sect. 3.2.3 and Gänsicke et al. 1995, 1998) the white dwarf does not seem to possess one well-defined heated accretion area that previously gave rise to pronounced UV-variability via fore-shortening and was used to constrain its size and temperature (see e.g.; Sect. 3.2.3). Given the lack of such well-behaved variability pattern we do not attempt to model the UV data in terms of a spot model. Without color information, without a clear phase-dependent variability pattern and with the likely co-existence of two or even more accretion areas the derived parameters would be degenerate and not really informative.
The simultaneity of the initial soft X-ray and UV absorption events and its duration suggests an origin in cold interbinary matter, likely an accretion curtain. The minimum countrate detected with the OM and the UVM2-filter at the bottom of the three absorption events is about 19 s−1 which corresponds to 4.2 × 10−14 ergs cm−2 s−1 Å−1. This is about the same flux that was estimated by Gänsicke et al. (1995) originating from the accretion stream or curtain. One may thus assume that the background light from the white dwarf and accretion spot is completely blocked and the remaining emission solely due to foreground emission from the accretion stream or curtain. Under this assumption the absorbing column density is log NH > 21.4 cm−2.
A similar amount of absorption was found from the spectral analysis with the UV-grism. Four spectra with the UV-grism were obtained (observations #12, 13, 14, and 15) with spectra #12, 13 and 15 being almost being almost identical to the high state, bright-phase IUE spectrum LWP 20132. They fall short of the IUE spectrum by 20−25% above 2800 Å, likely an instrumental effect (see Fig. 17). About 42% of spectrum #14 are affected by absorption. If de-reddened with absorption coefficients by Cardelli et al. (1989) the implied column density is NH = 1 × 1021 cm−2.
![]() |
Fig. 17. UV-to-optical spectral energy distribution in low and high states. Spectra shown in blue were obtained in low states by Gänsicke et al. (2006) and Schmidt et al. (1981), those in red in high states by Schachter et al. (1991) and Gänsicke et al. (1998). The OM grism spectrum shown in black is the mean of spectra #12, 13, and 15. The vertical lines in cyan indicate phase-dependent variability from time-resolved spectroscopy and photometry with the HST/GHRS, the OM with filters UVW2 (2144 Å) and UVM2 (2327 Å), and from the AAVSO through filters B and V. The red dotted line indicates the high-state bright-phase UV continuum measured by Gänsicke et al. (1995). |
We investigate the X-ray spectrum (all three EPIC cameras were used) during this phase of total soft X-ray absorption by adding a further cold absorber (TBABS) to the plateau plus flaring blackbody spectrum. The overall normalization of the plateau spectrum and the flaring blackbody were left free to account for geometric effects. The best fit ( for each individually fitted dip) was achieved when the parameters of the partial covering absorber were allowed to vary freely. The best fit parameters for the partial covering absorber were NH = (4.1 ± 0.1)×1022 cm−2, f = 0.93 ± 0.01 (f: covering fraction) and for the extra cold absorber (TBABS) a column density of NH = (1.2 ± 0.2)×1021 cm−2, the latter value in excellent agreement with that inferred from the UV absorption dip. Hence, the picture of a highly structured absorber emerges.
3.4. Phase-dependent variability of the Fe-line complex in 2005 and 2015
A search for phase-dependent variability of the line fluxes and the equivalent widths of the iron emission lines between 6 and 7 keV was performed. We were mostly interested in the photometric variability of the neutral line thought to originate from resonant scattering, also referred to as reflection.
The EPIC-pn data of 2005 and 2015 were sorted into twenty phase bins. The continuum-normalized phase-averaged spectra were arranged as an apparent trailed spectrogram and are displayed in the first row of Fig. 18.
![]() |
Fig. 18. Top: continuum-subtracted phase-averaged EPIC-pn spectra of AM Herculis obtained in 2005 (left) and in 2015 (right) arranged as apparent trailed spectrograms. Only the region around the Fe-line complex is shown. The original data were arranged in 20 phase bins and energy bins of 5 eV. The color bars indicate spectral flux in counts s−1 keV−1. Bottom: line flux and equivalent widths of the neutral Fe-line as a function of binary phase. The same data are shown twice in all panels just for better visibility of repetitive features. |
From a fit to the mean spectra in 2005 and 2015 for the restricted energy range between 6.0 and 7.5 keV with a bremsstrahlung component plus three Gaussian emission lines we found multiplicative factors between the line energies3.
With the line energy ratios known, we fit the spectra of the twenty phase bins and calculated line fluxes and equivalent widths of the 6.42 keV line. The results are also shown in Fig. 18 in the bottom row. Errors for the line fluxes and equivalent widths are given at the 1σ level.
Both the line flux and the equivalent width (EW) follow at both occasions roughly the continuum variability. This locates most of the line flux origin at the white dwarf surface around the normal-accreting prime pole. The high EW around phase 0.5 in 2005 is apparent only; it is compatible with zero.
There are nevertheless pronounced differences between 2005 and 2015. In 2005 the line flux was modulated by 100% whereas in 2015 it seemed to stay finite. The maximum line flux and the maximum EW were lower in 2015 than in 2005. The line flux variability follows the pattern of the underlying continuum (not shown in the figure, but see the light curves above, e.g., in Fig. 4) with the small but perhaps significant exception that the fractional variability in 2015 is about 55% in the continuum but 85% in the line. Would the irradiating spectrum be the same, a different maximum value of the EW would indicate a different viewing angle onto the accretion column. The absence of the self-eclipse requires a significant migration of the main accretion region. If this is sufficient to explain the change in maximum EW or if a varied irradiation spectrum also needs to be taken into account cannot be disentangled uniquely.
Theoretically, the equivalent width of the fluorescent iron line at a given orbital phase is dependent on various parameters describing the emission and the scattering processes. The WD mass, the magnetic field and the specific mass flow rate determine the emission properties and the height of the emitter above the WD surface, while the abundance of the ambient medium and the phase-dependent viewing geometry determine the actual strength of the fluorescent line. The viewing geometry itself depends on the orientation of the magnetic field in the accretion column, the orbital inclination and the phase angle. The abundance might also be variable as a function of distance from the accretion spot.
X-ray reflection and the behavior of the Fe Kα lines was recently modeled by Hayashi et al. (2018) as a function of the mentioned parameters. The detailed angular dependence of their post-shock accretion column (PSAC) model was not published, which only allows us to make a few qualitative statements comparing our data with their models. Firstly, an EW as large as 180 eV (as in 2015) or even larger as 200 eV (as in 2005) observed by us is not reproduced by their PSAC models. Their PSAC model for a standard mass flow rate of 1 g cm−2 s−1 for an 0.7 M⊙ WD gives an EW of 135 eV when viewed pole-on and reaches 160 eV at unrealistic high mass flow rates of 103 g cm−2 s−1. Such high an EW as observed in AM Herculis requires an enhanced iron abundance (not very likely to occur in the accretion region) or contributions from a scattering medium somewhere else than the white-dwarf surface, some pre-shock material or a diluted accretion halo being excellent candidates.
3.5. H-like and He-like oxygen lines in the RGS spectrum
In this subsection we wish to determine the location of the origin of the lines found in the RGS data with temperature and density diagnostics allowed by a line ratio analysis. Only the H-like O VIII line and the Helium-like O VII triplet are detected with sufficient signal in the RGS data. Previous brief accounts on those lines were given by Burwitz et al. (2002) and Girish et al. (2007) based on Chandra LETG and HETG observations, respectively. While Burwitz et al. (2002) report significantly broadened O VII, which they ascribe to phase-dependent Doppler shifts that lead to broadening in the phase-averaged spectrum, Girish et al. (2007) used line ratios to estimate electron temperatures and densities as 2 MK and > 2 × 1012 cm−3.
The electron density at the top of a standard accretion column with a specific mass flow (accretion) rate of 1 g cm−2 s−1 and with solar composition is expected to be of order 7.5 × 1015 cm−3, and more than an order of magnitude higher at its base and we test whether this estimate is consistent with the density-sensitive He-like triplet lines of O VII.
Ratios of hydrogen-like to helium-like lines and the line ratios of He-like triplets are widely used for diagnostics of a collisionally ionized and hybrid plasmas (see Porquet & Dubau 2000, and references to this paper), the latter via the ratios of the forbidden (f), the intercombination (i) and the resonance lines (r). Analytical relations between those depend on the electron density ne and the electron temperature Te are G(Te) = (f + i)/r and R(ne) = f/i (Gabriel & Jordan 1969).
For both observational campaigns the RGS data from both instruments were combined (and for 2005 all four revolutions, except OBSID0305240301, which did not contain RGS data) using the SAS task rgscombine and binned with a minimum of 20 counts per spectral bin. To derive line fluxes the resulting combined spectra were fitted with a bremsstrahlung component with fixed temperature at 15 keV to provide a background and Gaussians superposed. For the Helium-like triplet three Gaussians were used for the recombination line at 21.6015 Å, the intercombination line at 21.8036 Å, and the forbidden line at 22.0977 Å. The energies of the lines were fixed to each other according to their known ratios (taken from AtomDB) and their widths assumed to be equal. There was some uncertainty about the line strength of both the intercombination and the forbidden lines due to an excess of photons between the two lines. Thus the triple Gaussian fits were not found to be fully satisfactory (see Fig. 19) and some doubt remained about the mere existence of the forbidden line.
![]() |
Fig. 19. Mean RGS-spectra of the 2005 (top) and 2015 (bottom) observations centered on the He-like triplet of O VII. Vertical lines indicate the nominal line positions. Best-fit individual line components are shown in color. |
We tested for its existence by evaluating the changes of the χ2 statistics when the line flux was finite or set to zero. Following Wall & Jenkins (2012; their Eq. (6.11)) we find probabilities of 97.3% and 99.999% that the improvement in χ2 when the line is included is not due to a statistical fluctuation but due to an excess of flux at the predefined position of the forbidden line. We, therefore, proceed under the assumption that the forbidden line is present.
The line parameters as determined from the triple Gaussian spectral fits are listed in Table 6 with their statistical errors. To compute G and R ratios an additional 10% systematic uncertainty of the fluxes of the i and f line components were taken into account. This additional uncertainty was quantified by adding a further unresolved Gaussian between the forbidden and the intercombination lines at 565.0 eV and studying the impact on the flux of the adjacent lines. To derive the parameters of the O VIII line at 18.97 Å neither the line energy nor the widths were predetermined and fixed.
Oxygen line fit parameters.
Using our fits to the spectra obtained in 2005 and in 2015 we consistently derive an H/He line ratio of 0.35, R = 0.15 and G = 0.76−0.79 (see Table 6). The Chandra MEG-data analyzed by Girish et al. (2007) yielded R < 0.48 and G < 0.76, both values are in agreement with our data and analysis within the errors, although the RGS data are more constraining regarding the value of R.
The measured line ratio of H-like to He-like lines implies a temperature of 0.2 keV for a plasma in CIE ionization balance (Mewe et al. 1985). G and R-line ratios were computed for different ionization conditions by Porquet & Dubau (2000). The measured G ratio consistently implies an electron temperature of MK (165…300 eV) while the derived density, taken the measured R ratio at face value, becomes ne ≃ 7 × 1011 cm−3.
The implied temperatures from both the Helium-like triplet and the H/He-like line ratio is compatible with the lowest T of the multi-temperature APEC fit to the overall spectrum (Sect. 3.3.2). Hence, based on the temperature estimate the likely line formation region lies at the bottom of the accretion column. However, according to published shock models (cf. Imamura & Durisen 1983; Fischer & Beuermann 2001, see the estimate above) the density at the bottom of the column is several orders of magnitude higher than derived from the line ratios. Hence, our measured line ratio R is not compatible with shock models but is likely to be understood in the framework of a structured accretion region with a coronal plasma at a variety of densities. Analyzing XMM-Newton/RGS and Chandra/HETG spectra of the intermediate polar AE Aqr, Itoh et al. (2006) and Mauche (2009) derived similar densities in the line formation region of this object. This led Itoh et al. (2006) to conclude that the X-ray emitting plasma in AE Aqr cannot be a product of mass accretion onto the white dwarf.
For AM Herculis such a far reaching conclusion cannot be drawn, since X-ray emission in polars is proven to originate from small accretion-heated spots through eclipse studies (for example, Schwope et al. 2001) but the very low density of the line formation region is puzzling. The discrepancy between accretion column models and observations of MCVs might even be larger because the background UV radiation field from the white dwarf and the accretion hot spot will lead to de-excitation of the upper level of the forbidden line. Hence the density is overestimated when leaving out the effect of the radiation field (Ness et al. 2001; Mauche 2002). Mehdipour et al. (2015) have shown for a photoionized plasma that the value of R of the O VII triplet may be changed by a large amount if absorption (in particular of the intercombination line through Li-like oxygen) is taken into account. This effect gives a bias of the density diagnostics in the opposite, hence desired, direction than photo-dexcitation. However, since the X-ray spectrum is otherwise well explained by a collisionally ionized plasma we do not expect this effect to have a fundamental impact on the line ratio analysis. There is a clear desire to better understand the line formation scenarios in a structured accretion region with a interplay between collisions and photoionization.
The measured line positions of both species considered here give some weak evidence at the 1−2σ level for a positive radial velocity of order 100−200 km s−1 for 2005 and at 3σ for 2015. Such a velocity would be consistent with an origin from the bottom of an accretion column. We also searched for a relative line shift between orbital maximum and the phases when the accretion column is at the limb but those experiments yielded weak constrains only with Δv < 400 km s−1. Although our radial velocities have large error bars we cannot confirm any significant radial velocity variations of the oxygen lines of ≃750 km s−1 reported by Burwitz et al. (2002) on the basis of Chandra/LETG spectra obtained back in the year 2000 (September 30) during another high state of AM Herculis. A re-analysis of the Chandra/LETG spectra performed by us following standard recipes did not reveal a significant line shift either. It is evident to us, that reliable measurements of line shifts require data with much higher S/N than currently available through grating spectroscopy obtained with XMM-Newton and Chandra and typical average exposure times.
The measured line widths is slightly larger than the instrumental resolution. Formally the measured line widths of O VII were slightly discrepant but the differences stay below 3σ. The finite line width is difficult to interpret, since projected orbital and settling velocities in the column contribute to thermal broadening and cannot be disentangled.
3.6. Tomographic analysis of the 2015 CAFE spectra
The relative faintness of our target (for a 2.2 m aperture and a high-resolution spectrograph) together with our wish to obtain phase-resolved data led to noisy individual spectra. A continuum was difficult to recognize and only the most prominent lines like Hγ, He II 4686, Hβ, He I 5875 could be recognized in the mean spectrum or traced through the binary cycle (Hα). Despite the rather low signal-to-noise ratio of our spectra it became clear that the narrow emission line (NEL) that was prominent in a past high accretion state (Staude et al. 2004) was absent in the new data. The NEL, which is a prominent feature in many polars (see, e.g., the review by Marsh & Schwope 2016), originates from the UVX-irradiated hemisphere of the donor star and was used to trace the donor in the binary system and constrain the mass ratio.
The Hα Doppler map shown in Fig. 20 underlines the impression from visual inspection of the trailed spectrogram. There is no enhanced emission from the location of the donor star. Otherwise the map shows relatively little structure, emission is found in all quadrants, with most of the emission at negative y-velocities and with both negative and positive x-velocities. A negative vx indicates matter streaming from the donor to the white dwarf, a positive vx in the opposite direction. The optical and the high-energy observations with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR were taken two weeks apart. It is tempting to assume that AM Herculis was still in the reversed mode of accretion when the optical data were taken. If so, the map can be interpreted by assuming that the accretion curtain which gives rise to the prominent soft X-ray absorption prior to phase zero completely shields the donor star thus explaining the absence of the NEL. Streaming matter feeding all the accretion regions at near and far sides of the white dwarf as seen from the donor star leads to broad emission lines at various Doppler velocities, which cannot be disentangled and attributed to just one of the accretion streams or curtains. In that regard the new map is reminiscent to those of the asynchronous polars BY Cam and V1432 Aql (Marsh & Schwope 2016, their Fig. 11.14).
![]() |
Fig. 20. Doppler map of Hα based on spectra obtained on April 19, 2015, with CAFE. The values in the map were normalized to a range between 0 and 1. |
3.7. XMM-Newton slews
AM Her was observed four times by XMM-Newton during slews (Saxton et al. 2008). All slews were taken in full frame or extended full frame mode, with the medium filter. Though the effective on-target times are short (∼10−15 s) enough photons may be detected to distinguish between the normal and reversed accretion modes by hardness ratios and rough flux estimates.
We downloaded the slews and reduced them with the epproc and eslewchain tasks, then barycenter-corrected the resulting event lists to calculate the orbital phases during which the slews occurred. Fluxes in the 0.2−12 keV band, and count rates in the hard and soft bands, are taken from the slew catalog. The results are summarized in Table 7.
Summary of the XMM slew observations of AM Herculis.
We cannot compare hardness ratios of the former to the latter because different filters were used. Instead, we extracted spectra for the corresponding phase intervals for the PN instrument and produced spectral models that closely fit the continuum. These models were used to make fake spectra with 15 s exposure time and an ancillary response file for the medium filter. Photon counts in the hard and soft energy bands are thus directly comparable to count rates in the slews.
The first observation occurred just before the beginning of a long high state (see Fig. 1, MJD 54930) and during a period of variability between low and intermediate states. Its orbital phase was near the peak visibility of the primary accreting pole. The soft hardness ratio suggests that the accretion more resembled the normal rather than the reversed mode (cf. Fig. 4). We suspect, therefore, that this slew occurred during a brief intermediate state and that this exhibited the normal accretion mode.
The second slew observation was just after the beginning of the same high state. Its hardness ratio and flux are similar to the reversed state of 2015, and was therefore likely observed during similar behavior. This result suggests that switches between normal and reversed modes are not very rare.
Occurring slightly before a brief return to the low accretion state, the third slew observation has a very hard spectrum. Both of the pointed observations around this time had much softer spectra at this phase. It would have coincided with the intense flaring if in the reversed accretion mode. The flares persist for over a minute, and the gap between flares are of similar duration (see Sect. 3.3.3), but the slews represent a snapshot of only 10−15 s. We therefore repeated the 2015 fake slews twice, once for the gap between flares and once during a flare. The flare is much more luminous and softer, but even the between-flare spectrum does not resemble the low flux and hard spectrum observed in the slew from April 11, 2010. We therefore cannot identify which accretion state this slew corresponds to. It hints at the existence of other, previously uncharacterised, modes of accretion.
The final slew observation happened near the end of a rise toward high state after a short low state (MJD 55418), with orbital phase the same to that of the second slew. It has a hardness ratio similar to the normal (2005) mode of accretion but at a significantly lower flux.
4. Discussion
In this paper we have analysed comprehensive X-ray observations obtained with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR at X-ray and ultraviolet wavelengths and contemporaneous optical observations of the prototypical polar AM Herculis. These were obtained in high accretion states in 2005 and 2015. In 2005 AM Herculis was encountered in its regular mode of accretion, that means it had one X-ray bright accreting pole that was self-eclipsed for about 0.16 phase units. The spectrum could be described with a soft (blackbody-like) and a hard multi-temperature thermal component. No pronounced soft flaring was observed and the soft X-ray excess was rather moderate, Fbb, bol/FX, bol = 3.4−10 correlated with the X-ray brightness, hence accretion could be seemingly described with a standard accretion column model. The spectral parameters reported here are broadly consistent with those reported for previous high-state observations obtained with ROSAT, EUVE, RXTE, and Chandra/LETG (Beuermann et al. 2008, 2012; Paerels et al. 1996; Christian 2000). The total flux in the soft component reported by Beuermann et al. (2008) is higher than ours for 2005 through the inclusion of the far-UV component derived by Greeley et al. (1999), their bolometric flux was Fbb = 4.5 ± 1.5 × 10−9 ergs cm−2 s−1, with an error that was assumed to encompass the spread between individual high states according to Hessman et al. (2000). The soft X-ray flux varied between the four XMM-revolutions between (0.7−3.3)×10−9 ergs cm−2 s−1, which only includes our observed fluxes and does not make an attempt to correct for the unobserved EUV flux.
During the self-eclipse of the main accretion region observed in 2005 some basal flux was remaining and was sufficiently bright to extract an X-ray spectrum. Several components needed for a synthesis, two thermal, a soft blackbody-like component and a possible Fe emission line. In particular the presence of the soft component let us believe, that accretion at a second region is responsible for the remaining flux in the self eclipse. The line parameters are poorly constrained only but seem to imply a rather large equivalent width of about 0.7 keV, larger than compatible with direct emission from an accretion plasma or reflection. This may hint to scattering of X-rays into the observer’s line-of-sight.
A spectrum of the minimum phase was also extracted by Ishida et al. (1997). They found an Fe-line EW of 1−2 keV and concluded that such high a value is possible only for matter of solar abundance and the direct emission being completely blocked and the emission above the iron emission line energy range is scattered emission only. If this were true for our 2005 observation as well, we were in need to assume disjunct soft and hard emission regions, because the mere presence of the soft component requires a direct view. The mass accretion rate at the second pole is Ṁ = 5.5 × 10−13 M⊙ yr−1, about a hundred times lower than at the primary pole.
In 2015 AM Herculis was found in its reversed state of accretion with (at least) two bright accretion regions. One, still called the primary region was located somehow close to the same primary region as in the regular mode of accretion and displayed similar spectral properties. Its bright phase was centered at around phase 0.0. The other region was dominated by soft flares and was bright around phase 0.5. The phasing and spectral properties are similar as for the initial discovery of this accretion mode with EXOSAT some 30 years ago Heise et al. (1985). The novel feature reported here for the first time and observed in four consecutive binary cycles was the complete extinction of soft X-rays for more than 20% of the binary cycle. The onset of this feature which must be caused by an extended absorbing structure like a curtain varied by ∼0.08 phase units between 0.63 and 0.71. A second narrower absorption feature, an absorption dip, occurred between phase 0.9 and 0.95 and was observed as a distinct feature in the highest energy bands covered by XMM-Newton while it seemed to be intermingled with absorption in the curtain at low energies.
The soft pole observed in 2015 emits a higher X-ray flux than the nominal prime pole. The summed mass accretion rate of the two accretion regions was found to be of same order than that of the prime pole in the normal mode of accretion observed in 2005 (compare the results compiled in Tables 3 and 4). Hence, two-pole accretion in the reversed mode does not seem to be triggered by an enhanced overall accretion rate in a way that there is some overshooting material that is accreted at a second pole. The physics and the geometry must be more complex. Perhaps at times matter is threaded closer to L1 and then guided to remote places in the Roche lobe of the white dwarf. Also accretion along directly coupled field lines between both stars might be possible.
A self-eclipse of this main region was observed at optical and X-ray wavelengths. The duration of the X-ray self-eclipse during our observations in 2005 was ΔϕX, 2005 ≃ 0.16 but a bit difficult to measure unequivocally. Circulation polarization sign reversals, that also trace the self-eclipse, were typically observed to last a little longer, Δϕcirc = 0.20, 0.22, or 0.27 according to various authors (Priedhorsky et al. 1978; Bailey et al. 1984; Piirola 1988; Tapia 1977). The difference can be understood by realizing that the polarization signal indicates the center of the accretion region while the X-ray photometric signal is determined by the edges of the accretion region. The orbital inclination of AM Herculis is not well known and may lie between 35° and 50°. The duration of the circular polarization sign reversal requires i + δ = 97° −102°, only weakly dependent on the assumed value of i (δ being the co-latitude of the field lines in the accretion region). The co-latitude of the accretion spot, which we refer to as ψ, might be different, and its value is definitely smaller than that of δ in a dipolar field geometry.
During our X-ray observations in 2015 a self-eclipse of the normal accreting pole was no longer observed, similar to the EXOSAT observation some 30 years ago. Heise et al. (1985) explained the absence of the self-eclipse in the EXOSAT ME data by hard X-ray emission from the secondary pole. While this is possible such an explanation is not satisfactory because no increase in the hard X-ray emission is observed at the time when the soft flaring sets in. This is true for both the 1983 EXOSAT and the 2015 XMM-Newton observation.
An alternative explanation involves migration of the spot toward smaller ψ, which means that it moves farther away from the orbital plane, by some 5° to 10°. This explanation also has its difficulties if one assumes that this region is fed by a stream which initially follows a ballistic trajectory in the orbital plane and is then funneled to the accretion region in a dipolar geometry. The extent of a ballistic stream can be constrained by the extent of gaseous emission in Doppler maps. Given the known period and estimated stellar masses of AM Herculis the maximum velocity |vx| is 500 km s−1 corresponds to an azimuthal extent of the stream of less than 20° as seen from the white dwarf. The emerging accretion arc, the foot-points of all dipolar field lines which connect the white dwarf with the ballistic stream between L1 (azimuth 0°) and the maximum extent (azimuth 20°) was found to vary in co-latitude by less than two degrees. Hence, a spot migration due to late or early coupling as a response to a variable mass accretion rate has too little an effect on the co-latitude of the spot to explain the vanishing self-eclipse. This leaves a non-dipolar geometry as possible remedy for the observed larger shift of the accretion region. A non-dipolar field geometry and morphology is often invoked in studies of polars to explain observations that do not conform with a simple centered dipole model, for instance to explain the complex phase-resolved photospheric Zeeman patterns (recently by Beuermann et al. 2020). Here we find evidence from the variable self-eclipse in the X-ray light curves.
Even more puzzling is the geometry of the soft pole and the absorbing curtain. We firstly discuss the location of the soft pole. As described in Sect. 3.1 the emission is centered on phase ∼0.53 and lasts less than 0.5 phase units, hence is originating from the lower (“southern”) hemisphere and from that side of the white dwarf pointing away from the donor star. Its exact location is difficult to determine because we were unable to measure the end of the flaring phase precisely due to complete soft X-ray absorption. However, the general picture does not depend on these subtleties. The flaring phase of the EXOSAT observation also has a duration of less than 0.5 in phase and likely the same center. The remaining question is, how most of the matter manages to run around the white dwarf to be accreted at the far side (as seen from L1) without a significant increase in the mass accretion rate. Such accretion regions at odd places were described in several polars and pre-polars (see Schwope et al. 1990; Schwope & Beuermann 1997; Vogel et al. 2011, for UZ For, VV Pup, and WX LMi, respectively), although in those mentioned systems the far pole was always the faint one. Answering this question by detailed MHD simulations therefore is of general interest for accretion physics in a strongly magnetic environment.
The absorption curtain is a far or distant structure as seen from the white dwarf, i.e. likely several RWD away, because it absorbs radiation from both poles at the same time. The energy-resolved light curves and our spectral analysis reveal a highly structured absorbing curtain with a minimum column density of NH of 1021 cm−2. Since it is a far structure with an onset observed as early as phase ϕ = 0.63, i.e. it is in the hemisphere behind the white dwarf as seen from the donor star. One thus could naively associate the matter in this absorbing structure with accreted matter that feeds the second, soft pole. This picture will not work because the absorbing matter is above while the soft pole is below the orbital plane. Also, there was no such absorbing structure in the reversed mode observed by EXOSAT (cf. Heise et al. 1985), but the soft pole was nevertheless fed. It could be that the accreted matter from this curtain feeds an extra region in the upper hemisphere whose radiation fills the self-eclipse of the prime pole.
The detection of an absorbing curtain and the phase-scattered absorption dips that were prominently observed in the hard X-ray light curves argue for an inclination at the higher end of the range currently discussed, which lies between 35° and 60°, according to Brainerd & Lamb (1985) and our analysis above. In a dipolar field geometry – the field will be dipolar at several white dwarf radii – matter following the field lines cannot be lifted sufficiently high above the plane to give occultation events at low inclination. The combination of the relevant angles i and β (β: co-latitude of the accretion spot) requires i > β to give absorption events and i + β ≃ 105° to reflect the duration of the self-eclipse.
The UV data obtained with the OM were strikingly dissimilar between 2005 and 2015. The modulations of the light curve observed through the UVW2 filter (λeff = 2144 Å) in the regular accretion mode in 2005 could be understood in terms of foreshortening and self-eclipse of an accretion-heated spot. The flickering and to zeroth order flat light curve through the UVM2 filter (λeff = 2327 Å) in the two- or multiple-pole mode of accretion lacks any clear sign of fore-shortening. In our modeling of the UV emission in 2005 a stream contribution of 3.9 × 10−14 ergs cm−2 s−1 Å−1 was used. The stream/curtain was brighter by about 20% in 2015, as determined through the remaining flux in the absorption dips. The UV-flux at phase 0.5, i.e. at the nominal phase of the self-eclipse of the prime pole, was about 70% higher in 2015 than in 2005. Hence, a prominent extra source of UV-light was present in 2015 which was not self-eclipsed. This could be the white dwarf heated through accretion along the extended accretion curtain.
Simultaneous NuSTAR observations obtained in 2015 allowed us to uncover without any doubt the long sought-for reflection component and to perform a phase-resolved analysis which suggests scattering at the white-dwarf surface. This picture is supported by the phase-dependent variability of the neutral Fe-line at 6.4 keV (resonant scattering line) which could be traced through the orbital cycle for the first time. Both the variability and the peak value of its equivalent width are in the range expected for scattering at the white-dwarf surface.
The oxygen lines studied with the RGS are formed in an environment with kT corresponding to about 200 eV and at low velocity which hint to the bottom of the accretion column. The weakness of the forbidden line of He-like oxygen is usually interpreted as being formed in the high-density limit. Photodeexcitation through UV photons from the white dwarf and the accretion region leads to an yet to be quantified overestimated electron density, which on the other hand is several order of magnitudes below that expected at the bottom of the accretion column anyhow. A more detailed understanding of the line formation conditions requires the inclusion of more He-like species that are sensitive for other density ranges and better resolved data for radial velocity studies. Such studies will be feasible with the X-IFU onboard ATHENA (see below).
5. Conclusions and outlook
We have presented an in-depth study of the prototypical polar, AM Herculis, using all data obtained with XMM-Newton so far and with all instruments, supplemented by further space- and ground-based data (NuSTAR and optical photometry). The data obtained in 2015 offered a new accretion state, a reversed mode with extended phases of X-ray absorption due to an accretion curtain. Interestingly, the reversed mode is not triggered by a significantly enhanced or reduced accretion rate.
In its lifetime AM Herculis has exhibited three distinctly different accretion modes: the normal and reversed states, and now a variant of the reversed mode with strong soft absorption. Furthermore, the anomalous slew snapshot from April 11, 2010, hints at an even richer variety of behaviors waiting to be studied. Matt et al. (2000) and Christian (2000) reported further mixed states when observed with BeppoSAX and RXTE/EUVE.
Given the low energy resolution of the EPIC-pn we could not perform a radial velocity study of the Fe-line complex between 6.4 and 7 keV, although this was tempting given the claim of a significant velocity shift reported by Girish et al. (2007). We were, however, motivated by our study to sketch the opportunities for plasma diagnostics that will be provided in about a decade from now with ATHENA and the X-IFU as detector. We used the plasma parameters for the prime pole to normalize the output of an adapted version of the detailed MHD calculations by Fischer & Beuermann (2001) with 30 layers in the settling accretion column to simulate a 100 ks observation of AM Herculis with ATHENA. We used a model with B = 14 MG, MWD = 0.8 M⊙, and specific mass flow rate ṁ = 0.01 g cm−2 s−1. The orbital velocity, thermal and velocity broadening, and the gravitational redshift were taken into account when computing phase-resolved spectra with the APEC plasma code. An inclination angle of i = 35° and a magnetic colatitude of β = 65° was used for projection into the observers frame. The results for the iron line complex are shown in Fig. 21 both as line plots and as an apparent trailed spectrogram to be achieved through phase-folding. We did not account for geometric fore-shortening, hence the model describes an idealized situation. Nevertheless, the prospects for detailed plasma diagnostics and radial velocity studies are breath-taking. The ionized Fe-lines originate from different layers in the accretion column which have different settling velocities. The orbital velocity is seen in the resonance line of neutral Fe, which will make AM Herculis (and similar systems) a double-lined spectroscopic binary that will allow direct measurements of the white-dwarf mass through its gravitational redshift and allow us to disentangle the physical conditions in the accretion column.
![]() |
Fig. 21. Simulation of a 100 ks observation of AM Herculis with the ATHENA X-IFU neglecting the self-eclipse with a phase resolution of 0.1. For better visibility of repeated features the same data are shown twice. Upper panel: linear flux limits were chosen, in the lower panel a logarithmic scale was used to highlight subtle differences. |
Acknowledgments
We wish to express our deep gratitude to the AAVSO amateurs that enthusiastically supported this project through dedicated, comprehensive, time-resolved photometric observations. In total 35 amateurs took part in the campaign collecting more than 16000 data points, six during the time when satellites were observing (1534 observations). We thank all the observers (listed in alphabetical order): John Appleyard, Janos Bakos, James Boardman, Balazs Bago, Paul Benni, John Bortle, Laurent Corp, Lew Cook, Alicia Capetillo Blanco, David Dowhos, Shawn Dvorak, Pavol Dubovsky, Tonis Eenmae, James Foster, Gilles Guzman, Tomas Gomez, Alfredo Glez-Herrera, Barbara Harris, John Hall, Miroslav Komorous, Robert Koff, Damien Lemay, Attila Madai, Ian Miller, Nikolay Mishevskiy, Kenneth Menzies, Otmar Nickel, Sandor Papp, Timothy Parson, Roger Pickard, Gary Poyner, George Sjöberg, Seiji Tsuji, David Vogel, and Gary Walker. Observers from 11 countries contributed their data (in alphabetical order): Canada, Estonia, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Japan, Slovakia, Spain, Ukraine, United States of America. This work made use of data from the NuSTAR mission, a project led by the California Institute of Technology, managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We thank the XMM-Newton and NuSTAR Operations, Software and Calibration teams for support with the execution and analysis of these observations. We thank Detlef Koester (Uni Kiel) for providing his model spectra of DA white dwarfs. We thank Michael Freyberg and Frank Haberl (MPE Garching) for discussions on the calibration of EPIC-pn. We thank C.W. Mauche and Jan-Uwe Ness for advice on He-like triplets. This work was supported by the German DLR under projects 50 OR 1405, 50 OR 1711, and 50 OR 1814.
References
- Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197 [Google Scholar]
- Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, eds. G. H. Jacoby, & J. Barnes, ASP Conf. Ser., 101, 17 [Google Scholar]
- Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Mantelet, G., & Andrae, R. 2018, AJ, 156, 58 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, J., Hough, J. H., Gilmozzi, R., & Axon, D. J. 1984, MNRAS, 207, 777 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beuermann, K., El Kholy, E., & Reinsch, K. 2008, A&A, 481, 771 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Beuermann, K., Burwitz, V., & Reinsch, K. 2012, A&A, 543, A41 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Beuermann, K., Burwitz, V., Reinsch, K., Schwope, A., & Thomas, H. C. 2020, A&A, 634, A91 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Brainerd, J. J., & Lamb, D. Q. 1985, in Orientations of AM Her Stars from their Polarization Properties: The Case of the Missing AM Her Stars, eds. D. Q. Lamb, & J. Patterson, 247 [Google Scholar]
- Bunner, A. N. 1978, ApJ, 220, 261 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Burwitz, V., Reinsch, K., Haberl, F., Gänsicke, B. T., & Predehl, P. 2002, in The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, eds. B. T. Gänsicke, K. Beuermann, & K. Reinsch, ASP Conf. Ser., 261, 137 [Google Scholar]
- Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Christian, D. J. 2000, AJ, 119, 1930 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cropper, M. 1990, Space Sci. Rev., 54, 195 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- den Herder, J. W., Brinkman, A. C., Kahn, S. M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L7 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, A., & Beuermann, K. 2001, A&A, 373, 211 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Frank, J., King, A. R., & Lasota, J.-P. 1988, A&A, 193, 113 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Gabriel, A. H., & Jordan, C. 1969, MNRAS, 145, 241 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gaia Collaboration (Brown, A. G. A., et al.) 2018, A&A, 616, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Gänsicke, B. T., Beuermann, K., & de Martino, D. 1995, A&A, 303, 127 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Gänsicke, B. T., Hoard, D. W., Beuermann, K., Sion, E. M., & Szkody, P. 1998, A&A, 338, 933 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Gänsicke, B. T., Fischer, A., Silvotti, R., & de Martino, D. 2001, A&A, 372, 557 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Gänsicke, B. T., Long, K. S., Barstow, M. A., & Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ, 639, 1039 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Giacconi, R., Murray, S., Gursky, H., et al. 1972, ApJ, 178, 281 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Girish, V., Rana, V. R., & Singh, K. P. 2007, ApJ, 658, 525 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Greeley, B. W., Blair, W. P., Long, K. S., & Raymond, J. C. 1999, ApJ, 513, 491 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hameury, J. M., & King, A. R. 1988, MNRAS, 235, 433 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi, T., Kitaguchi, T., & Ishida, M. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1810 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Heise, J., Brinkman, A. C., Gronenschild, E., et al. 1985, A&A, 148, L14 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Hessman, F. V., Gänsicke, B. T., & Mattei, J. A. 2000, A&A, 361, 952 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Imamura, J. N., & Durisen, R. H. 1983, ApJ, 268, 291 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ishida, M., Matsuzaki, K., Fujimoto, R., Mukai, K., & Osborne, J. P. 1997, MNRAS, 287, 651 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Itoh, K., Okada, S., Ishida, M., & Kunieda, H. 2006, ApJ, 639, 397 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kafka, S. 2020, Observations from the AAVSO International Database, www.aavso.org [Google Scholar]
- King, A. R. 2000, ApJ, 541, 306 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kruszewski, A. 1978, in Nonstationary Evolution of Close Binaries, ed. A. N. Zytkow, 55 [Google Scholar]
- Kuijpers, J., & Pringle, J. E. 1982, A&A, 114, L4 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Litchfield, S. J., & King, A. R. 1990, MNRAS, 247, 200 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh, T. R., & Schwope, A. D. 2016, in Astronomy at High Angular Resolution, eds. H. M. J. Boffin, G. Hussain, J. P. Berger, & L. Schmidtobreick, Astrophys. Space Sci. Lib., 439, 195 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mason, K. O., Breeveld, A., Much, R., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L36 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Matt, G., de Martino, D., Gänsicke, B. T., et al. 2000, A&A, 358, 177 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Mauche, C. W. 2002, in Plasma Diagnostics in High-resolution X-ray Spectra of Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables, eds. B. T. Gänsicke, K. Beuermann, & K. Reinsch, ASP Conf. Ser., 261, 113 [Google Scholar]
- Mauche, C. W. 2009, ApJ, 706, 130 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mazeh, T., Kieboom, K., & Heise, J. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 513 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., & Raassen, A. J. J. 2015, A&A, 579, A87 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Mewe, R., Gronenschild, E. H. B. M., & van den Oord, G. H. J. 1985, A&AS, 62, 197 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Mukai, K., Rana, V., Bernardini, F., & de Martino, D. 2015, ApJ, 807, L30 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nandra, K., O’Neill, P. M., George, I. M., & Reeves, J. N. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 194 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nauenberg, M. 1972, ApJ, 175, 417 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ness, J. U., Mewe, R., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., et al. 2001, A&A, 367, 282 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Paerels, F., Hur, M. Y., Mauche, C. W., & Heise, J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 884 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Piirola, V. 1988, in On the Evidence for Discrete Emission Regions in AM Her Type Objects, eds. G. V. Coyne, A. M. Magalhaes, A. F. Moffat, R. E. Schulte-Ladbeck, & S. Tapia, 261 [Google Scholar]
- Porquet, D., & Dubau, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 495 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Priedhorsky, W. C., Krzeminski, W., & Tapia, S. 1978, ApJ, 225, 542 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ramsay, G., Cropper, M., & Mason, K. O. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 285 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Raymond, J. C., Black, J. H., Davis, R. J., et al. 1979, ApJ, 230, L95 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rothschild, R. E., Gruber, D. E., Knight, F. K., et al. 1981, ApJ, 250, 723 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Saxton, R. D., Read, A. M., Esquej, P., et al. 2008, A&A, 480, 611 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Schachter, J., Filippenko, A. V., Kahn, S. M., & Paerels, F. B. S. 1991, ApJ, 373, 633 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, G. D., Stockman, H. S., & Margon, B. 1981, ApJ, 243, L157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz, R., Hedelt, P., Rau, A., Staude, A., & Schwope, A. D. 2002, in The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, eds. B. T. Gänsicke, K. Beuermann, & K. Reinsch, ASP Conf. Ser., 261, 167 [Google Scholar]
- Schwope, A. D., & Beuermann, K. 1997, Astron. Nachr., 318, 111 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schwope, A. D., Beuermann, K., & Thomas, H. C. 1990, A&A, 230, 120 [Google Scholar]
- Schwope, A. D., Schwarz, R., Sirk, M., & Howell, S. B. 2001, A&A, 375, 419 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Schwope, A., Schwarz, R., Gänsicke, B., Burwitz, V., & Reinsch, K. 2006, in The X-ray Universe 2005, ed. A. Wilson, ESA SP, 604, 297 [Google Scholar]
- Staude, A., Schwope, A. D., Hedelt, P., Rau, A., & Schwarz, R. 2004, in IAU Colloq. 190: Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables, eds. S. Vrielmann, & M. Cropper, ASP Conf. Ser., 315, 251 [Google Scholar]
- Stella, L., Beuermann, K., & Patterson, J. 1986, ApJ, 306, 225 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Granzer, T., Weber, M., et al. 2004, Astron. Nachr., 325, 527 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strüder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Szkody, P., Cordova, F. A., Tuohy, I. R., et al. 1980, ApJ, 241, 1070 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tapia, S. 1977, ApJ, 212, L125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, M. B. 2005, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, eds. P. Shopbell, M. Britton, & R. Ebert, ASP Conf. Ser., 347, 29 [Google Scholar]
- Turner, M. J. L., Abbey, A., Arnaud, M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Vogel, J., Schwope, A. D., & Schwarz, R. 2011, A&A, 530, A117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Wall, J. V., & Jenkins, C. R. 2012, Practical Statistics for Astronomers (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Worpel, H., Schwope, A. D., Traulsen, I., Mukai, K., & Ok, S. 2018, A&A, 617, A52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
All Tables
Bright and faint phase spectral parameters in 2005 for the model TBabs*pcfabs*(bbodyrad + constant*(apec + apec + gaussian)).
Parameters and fluxes for the plateau phase (0.05 < ϕ < 0.25, top part) and the additional soft flux in the flaring phase (bottom part).
Flare parameters derived from blackbody fits to 84 individual soft flares from the second pole in AM Herculis.
All Figures
![]() |
Fig. 1. AAVSO V-band light curve between January 1, 1999, and June 20, 2016. Launch dates of XMM-Newton and Chandra are indicated by blue and red arrows. X-ray observations with those observatories are indicated by vertical lines. XMM-Newton slew observations are indicated with dotted lines. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 2. V-band photometry obtained with STELLA/WiFSIP between March 27 and April 8, 2015. Shown is the average behavior binned into 100 phase bins (red line) on the background of the 3200 individual photometric data points illustrating the variability of the source. The typical photometric error is 0.005 mag. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 3. BVRI photometry of AM Herculis collected between April 2 and April 16 by amateur astronomers and provided via the AAVSO web-pages. The 15037 individual measurements that were taken through a V filter are shown with small black symbols. There are 272/202/202 measurements through B, R, and I filters, respectively, that are not shown individually. Bin sizes for phase-folding the original data were 0.01 for V (green line) and 0.05 otherwise, which are shown in blue/magenta/red for the BRI filters. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 4. From top to bottom: optical, ultraviolet, soft, and hard X-ray light curves obtained in 2005 (left) and 2015 (right). They were obtained from the AAVSO data base, with the optical monitor and with EPIC onboard XMM-Newton, and with NuSTAR, respectively. Original photon data were binned with a time bin size of 30 s. Phase-averaged light curves have 40 bins per orbital cycle. All data are shown twice for better visibility. The OM-filters were not the same in 2005 and 2015. The y-axis scale for 2015 have been compressed by a factor of 3. The soft X-ray light curves (third panel from above) were built using photons in the energy range 0.2−0.5 keV with EPIC-MOS (2005) and EPIC-pn (2015) with the thin and the thick filters, respectively (see Table 1). The hard X-ray light curves are based on EPIC-pn (2005) covering the energy range 2−10 keV and NuSTAR (2015, no energy selection). Colors of individual data points obtained in 2005 indicate different satellite orbits (2005 data, color – orbit): green – 1027, red – 1028, cyan – 1029, blue – 1030, magenta – 1031. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 5. From top to bottom: light curves obtained during the multi-observatory campaign in 2015 in original time sequence. Facilities used are indicated in the individual panels. Time bins are 10 s for the OM, and 60 s for EPIC-pn and NuSTAR, respectively. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 6. Energy-dependent EPIC-pn X-ray and OM UV light curves of the 2015 observation obtained with XMM-Newton. Time bins are 10 s for the UV and 60 s for the X-ray spectral range. The horizontal bars in the upper panel indicate the length and the mean brightness between 2200 and 2400 Å of the four grism spectra. Spectral flux density was converted to count rate using the conversion factor given in the XMM-Newton users handbook. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 7. Bright-phase EPIC-MOS and RGS spectra of AM Herculis obtained in 2005 with best-fitting model B. The individual model components are shown with dotted lines. Lower panel: residuals with respect to the best fit in units of σ. Different colors were used to indicate data from the different instruments involved in the fit. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 8. Faint-phase EPIC-MOS (main panel) and -pn (inset) spectra of AM Herculis obtained 2005 with best-fit model spectra overplotted. Observed data were binned with a minimum of 25 counts per spectral bin. Two model components are shown, the soft blackbody and the sum of all others originating from the accretion plasma |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 9. Phase-folded Optical Monitor (OM, filter UVW2, lower panels) and EPIC-pn (0.4−10 keV, upper panels) light curves per revolution obtained in 2005. The XMM-Newton revolution is indicated in the upper panels. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 10. Phase-averaged optical monitor light curve and spot model. Fluxes Fλ are given in units of 10−16 ergs cm−2 s−1 Å−1. The best-fit is shown with a solid line, the contributions from the heated spot and the unheated white dwarf with dashed and dotted lines, respectively. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 11. Trains of binned photons observed in 2005 in the UV (OM/UVW2, red color) and the hard X-ray regime (2−10 keV, blue color). Bin size is 30 s each. The XMM-Newton revolution is indicated. The UV-data were plotted with an offset of −5 and −8 units in the lower and upper panels, respectively. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 12. Combined XMM-Newton and NuSTAR bright-phase spectrum obtained in 2015. Model fits and residuals with (blue) and without (red) reflection component are shown in the two lower panels. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 13. Phase-dependent reflection amplitude for EPIC and NuSTAR spectra. Two cycles are plotted for clarity, and error bars indicate the 1σ uncertainty. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 14. Bright-phase spectrum (plateau) from 2015 with best fitting model. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 15. Flare details in cycle 41538. The soft X-ray light curve (0.2−0.5 keV) is shown in black with 1 s time resolution, the hard X-ray light curve (2−5 keV) at 5 s resolution in blue. Optical photometry is shown in red, the inserted scale bar ranges from V = 13.1 at bottom to 12.6 mag with a 0.1 mag separation between ticks. Three flares are identified and marked by vertical dashed lines. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 16. Flares at the second pole of AM Herculis in its anomalous state. Shown are the mean mass accretion rate and temperature of the individual flares against the emitting fraction of the WD surface (left panels), and against the mass of the accreting blob (right panels). Although Ṁ and kT are strongly dependent on the size of the emitting area, they appear to be independent of the mass of the infalling blob. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 17. UV-to-optical spectral energy distribution in low and high states. Spectra shown in blue were obtained in low states by Gänsicke et al. (2006) and Schmidt et al. (1981), those in red in high states by Schachter et al. (1991) and Gänsicke et al. (1998). The OM grism spectrum shown in black is the mean of spectra #12, 13, and 15. The vertical lines in cyan indicate phase-dependent variability from time-resolved spectroscopy and photometry with the HST/GHRS, the OM with filters UVW2 (2144 Å) and UVM2 (2327 Å), and from the AAVSO through filters B and V. The red dotted line indicates the high-state bright-phase UV continuum measured by Gänsicke et al. (1995). |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 18. Top: continuum-subtracted phase-averaged EPIC-pn spectra of AM Herculis obtained in 2005 (left) and in 2015 (right) arranged as apparent trailed spectrograms. Only the region around the Fe-line complex is shown. The original data were arranged in 20 phase bins and energy bins of 5 eV. The color bars indicate spectral flux in counts s−1 keV−1. Bottom: line flux and equivalent widths of the neutral Fe-line as a function of binary phase. The same data are shown twice in all panels just for better visibility of repetitive features. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 19. Mean RGS-spectra of the 2005 (top) and 2015 (bottom) observations centered on the He-like triplet of O VII. Vertical lines indicate the nominal line positions. Best-fit individual line components are shown in color. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 20. Doppler map of Hα based on spectra obtained on April 19, 2015, with CAFE. The values in the map were normalized to a range between 0 and 1. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 21. Simulation of a 100 ks observation of AM Herculis with the ATHENA X-IFU neglecting the self-eclipse with a phase resolution of 0.1. For better visibility of repeated features the same data are shown twice. Upper panel: linear flux limits were chosen, in the lower panel a logarithmic scale was used to highlight subtle differences. |
In the text |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.