Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 568, August 2014
Article Number A62
Number of page(s) 34
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322489
Published online 14 August 2014

© ESO, 2014

1. Introduction

Star formation encompasses the birth of new stars through the fragmentation and contraction of cold, dense molecular gas, hereby recycling the interstellar medium (ISM) content of galaxies (McKee & Ostriker 2007). Knowing the instantaneous level of star formation (i.e., the star formation rate) not only sheds light on the conditions in the ISM, but also on the evolution of galaxies and their formation processes. If we want to understand the physical processes that control galaxy evolution, being able to probe the star formation activity is of great importance. Tracing back star formation in some of the first objects in the early Universe until the present day could even allow us to probe the star formation activity throughout cosmic times.

Since the main coolants in metal-rich galaxies such as the Milky Way are mostly metal-based ([Cii], [Oi], [Oiii], CO, dust), the metal abundance is considered a fundamental parameter in the regulation of star formation through its influence on the initial cooling of diffuse gas (e.g., Glover & Clark 2014) and the survival of clouds through shielding. Star formation in the early Universe is considered to differ significantly from the present day’s gas consumption in galaxies. Because of the extremely low metal abundances in the early Universe, the gas coolants and initiation processes of star formation were likely to be different from star formation conditions in the local Universe (e.g., Ly α cooling becomes more important). Nearby low-metallicity galaxies might be important laboratories to investigate the connection between the chemical enrichment and star formation processes. Although the present day metal-poor dwarfs will have experienced some evolution throughout cosmic time (e.g., Hodge et al. 1991; Tosi et al. 2007), their slow chemical evolution makes them important testbeds to understand metallicity effects potentially applicable to galaxies in the early Universe.

Star formation rates (SFRs) on global galaxy scales are typically estimated from scaling relations between diagnostic tracers of the star formation activity, and calibrated against the most up to date stellar population synthesis models and characterization of the initial mass function (IMF). Up to the present day, the most widely used SFR diagnostics have been based on continuum bands and optical/near-IR emission lines (see Kennicutt 1998; and Kennicutt & Evans 2012, for a detailed overview). The brightest cooling lines in the atomic and molecular medium are emitted from mid-infrared to radio wavelengths, which have been probed extensively with the Herschel Space Observatory (Pilbratt et al. 2010). Follow-up is guaranteed with SOFIA in the local Universe or, at high spatial resolution, with ground-based interferometers such as the Atacama large millimeter array (ALMA) and the future northern extended millimeter array (NOEMA) in the high-redshift Universe. These facilities open up a whole new spectral window, which favors the use of far-infrared (FIR) and submillimeter (submm) continuum bands (e.g., PACS 70 μm, Li et al. 2013) and emission lines as SFR diagnostics across a large variety of galaxy populations.

Here, we investigate the utility of the three brightest fine-structure cooling lines, [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 (e.g., Hunter et al. 2001; Brauher et al. 2008; Cormier et al., in prep.), as tracers of the star formation activity in a sample of low-metallicity dwarf galaxies from the Herschel Dwarf Galaxy Survey (Madden et al. 2013). We, furthermore, assess the influence of metallicity, which is an important parameter controlling star formation in galaxies, constraining the reservoir of dust grains for the formation of molecules and regulating the attenuation of the FUV photons necessary for shielding molecules.

The [Cii] 157.74 μm line has been put forward as a potential powerful tracer of the star formation activity in the nearby as well as the more distant Universe (Stacey et al. 1991; Boselli et al. 2002; Stacey et al. 2010; De Looze et al. 2011; Sargsyan et al. 2012) and we, now, aim to expand this analysis to nearby, low-metallicity dwarf galaxies. This [Cii] line is considered to be the dominant coolant for neutral atomic gas in the ISM (Tielens & Hollenbach 1985a,b; Wolfire et al. 1995) and, therefore, among the brightest emission lines originating from star-forming galaxies (e.g., Stacey et al. 1991; Malhotra et al. 1997; Brauher et al. 2008). In particular, low-metallicity galaxies show exceptionally strong [Cii] line emission (e.g., Poglitsch et al. 1995; Madden et al. 1997; Madden 2000; Hunter et al. 2001; Cormier et al. 2010; Israel & Maloney 2011). Carbon has an ionization potential of 11.3 eV (compared to 13.6 eV for hydrogen), implying that line emission can originate from neutral and ionized gas components (see Table 1). A changing contribution of different gas phases on global scales can prevent a correlation between the [Cii] line emission and the level of star formation. The excitation of C+ atoms might, furthermore, saturate at high temperatures, where the line becomes insensitive to the intensity of the radiation field at temperatures well above the excitation potential (Kaufman et al. 1999). The [Cii] emission can also saturate in neutral gas media with hydrogen densities nH ≳ 103 cm-3, where the recombination of C+ into neutral carbon and, eventually, CO molecules is favored (Kaufman et al. 1999). Self-absorption can also affect the [Cii] line excitation in high column densities of gas (NH ~ 4 × 1022 cm-2, Malhotra et al. 1997). Although the [Cii] line is usually not affected by extinction, optical depth effects might become important in extreme starbursts (Luhman et al. 1998; Helou 2000) and edge-on galaxies (Heiles 1994). On top of this, deficits in the [Cii]/FIR ratio toward warm dust temperatures (Crawford et al. 1985; Stacey et al. 1991; Malhotra et al. 1997, 2001; Luhman et al. 2003; Verma et al. 2005; Brauher et al. 2008; Graciá-Carpio et al. 2011; Croxall et al. 2012; Díaz-Santos et al. 2013; Farrah et al. 2013) suggest that the [Cii] conditions might be different in galaxies that are offset from the main sequence of star-forming galaxies. Since carbon can also be significantly depleted on carbon-rich dust grains, the use of O-based gas tracers might be preferred instead.

Table 1

Excitation conditions of the fine-structure lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88, with Col. 2 providing the ionization potential (IP) to create the species.

The [Oi]63 line has a critical density ncrit,H~ 5 × 105 cm-3 and upper state energy Eu/k ~ 228 K (see Table 1), which makes it an efficient coolant in dense and/or warm photodissociation regions (PDRs). Although generally observed to be the second brightest line (after [Cii]), the [Oi]63 line is observed to be brighter in galaxies with warm FIR colors and/or high gas densities (Malhotra et al. 2001; Brauher et al. 2008; Lebouteiller et al. 2012). The applicability of [Oi]63 as an SFR calibrator might, however, be hampered by self-absorption (Kraemer et al. 1996; Poglitsch et al. 1996), optical depth effects (more so than [Cii]) and the possible excitation of [Oi]63 through shocks (Hollenbach & McKee 1989). In the situation that the gas heating is not longer dominated by the photoelectric effect but has an important contribution from other heating mechanisms (e.g., mechanical heating, soft X-ray heating), the origin of the line emission might differ from the paradigm of warm and/or dense PDRs. A possible origin of [Oi]63 emission that is different from PDRs can be, in particular, expected in the most metal-poor galaxies characterized by overall low metal content and diminished polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) abundances.

With an energy of the upper state Eu/k ~ 163 K, critical density ncrit,e ~ 510 cm-3 and a high ionization potential of 35.1 eV for O+, the [Oiii]88 line originates from diffuse, highly ionized regions near young O stars. Ionized gas tracers such as [Oiii]88 might gain in importance in low-metallicity environments where PDRs occupy only a limited volume of the ISM judging from their weak PAH emission (Boselli et al. 2004; Engelbracht et al. 2005; Jackson et el. 2006; Madden et al. 2006; Draine et al. 2007; Engelbracht et al. 2008; Galliano et al. 2008) and low CO abundance (Poglitsch et al. 1995; Israel et al. 1996; Madden et al. 1997; Israel & Maloney 2011). Based on our Herschel observations, we focus on [Oiii]88 as ionized gas tracer. Because of the low critical densities for [Oiii]88 excitation with electrons, other lines (e.g., [Oiii]52 but also optical lines such as [Oiii] 5007 Å and Hα) will likely dominate the cooling of ionized gas media for intermediate and high gas densities. The brightness of the [Oiii]88 emission line in metal-poor galaxies (Cormier et al., in prep.), however, hints at an SFR tracer with great potential for the high-redshift Universe.

On top of the SFR calibrations for single FIR lines, we try to combine the emission of [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 lines to trace the SFR. The total gas cooling in galaxies scales with the SFR assuming that the ISM is in thermal equilibrium and the total cooling budget balances the gas heating. Therefore, any FIR fine-structure line can be considered a reliable tracer of the SFR if it plays an important role in the cooling of gas that was heated by young stellar photons. Other heating mechanisms unrelated to the UV radiation (e.g., mechanical heating, cosmic ray heating, and X-ray heating) and, thus, not directly linked to SFR, might disperse this link. Ideally, we combine the emission of several cooling lines in the ultraviolet/optical (e.g., Ly α, Hα, [Oiii] 5007 Å) and infrared (e.g., [Neiii] 16 μm, [Siii] 19, 33 μm, [Cii] 158 μm, [Oi] 63, 145 μm, [Nii] 122, 205 μm, [Oiii] 52, 88 μm, [Niii] 57 μm, and [Siii] 35 μm) wavelength domains to cover the total gas cooling budget in galaxies. Given our focus on the FIR coolants, we attempt to obtain a more complete picture of the overall cooling budget by combining the [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 lines.

The Herschel Dwarf Galaxy Survey (DGS) and observations are presented in Sect. 2, together with the acquisition and processing of ancillary data, which will be used as reference SFR calibrators. In Sect. 3, we take advantage of the high spatial resolution attained for the most nearby galaxies to study the trends and scatter in the spatially resolved relation between the SFR and FIR line emission. The SFR calibrations and trends with the scatter in the SFRLline relations based on global galaxy measurements for the entire DGS sample are presented in Sect. 4. SFR calibrations for each of the fine-structure lines [Cii], [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 are derived for a selection of different galaxy populations in Sect. 5. In Sect. 6, we draw our conclusions. Appendix A discusses the applicability of different unobscured (Sect. A.2) and obscured (Sect. A.3) indicators as reference SFR tracers for the low-metallicity DGS sample. Appendix A.4 presents a comparison between Herschel and ISO spectroscopy. Tables with source information, measurements of reference SFR calibrators and FIR lines are presented in Appendix B for the DGS sample, the literature sample of galaxies with starburst, composite, or AGN classifications and high-redshift sources.

2. Dwarf Galaxy Survey

2.1. Sample characteristics

The Dwarf Galaxy Survey (DGS, Madden et al. 2013) is a Herschel guaranteed time key program, gathering the photometry from the Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS, Poglitsch et al. 2010) and the Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE, Griffin et al. 2010), and PACS spectroscopy of 50 dwarf galaxies in 230 h. The sample was selected to cover a wide range in metallicities from 12 + log  (O/H) = 8.43 (He 2-10, 0.55 Z) down to 7.14 (I Zw18, 0.03 Z)1. The sample selection was furthermore optimized to maximize the availability of ancillary data. With distances ranging from several kpc to 191 Mpc, the Dwarf Galaxy Survey observes the line emission of more distant galaxies within a single beam (PACS beams have full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 11.5, 9.5 and 9.5 for [Cii], [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88), while the extended FIR line emission from the brightest star-forming regions is mapped in the most nearby galaxies by the Herschel Space Observatory. More details about the sample selection as well as a description of the scientific goals of the survey are outlined in Madden et al. (2013).

2.2. Herschel data

Spectroscopic mapping of the [Cii] 158 μm line was performed for 48 galaxies2, among which most galaxies were also covered in [Oiii] 88 μm (43 out of 48 galaxies) and [Oi] 63  μm (38 out of 48 galaxies). Far-infrared fine-structure lines [Oi] 145 μm, [Nii] 122 μm, [Nii] 205 μm, and [Niii] 57 μm were probed in a subsample of the brightest galaxies (see the histogram in Fig. 4 of Madden et al. 2013). An overview of the spectroscopy observations, data reduction, line flux measurements, and line ratios is provided in Cormier et al. (in prep).

thumbnail Fig. 1

Ratio of the unobscured (LFUV) versus obscured star formation (3.89*L24), as a function of oxygen abundance, 12 +log  (O/H), for the DGS sample. The multiplicative factor of 3.89 in the denominator arises from the calibration coefficient that corrects the observed FUV emission for extinction following Hao et al. (2011) (i.e., LFUV(corr) = LFUV (obs) + 3.89 × L24). Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. Data points correspond to global galaxy fluxes.

2.3. Reference SFR diagnostic

To establish the applicability of FIR lines to trace the SFR, we need to specify a reference star formation rate tracer. Typically, combinations of SF diagnostics are used to trace the unobscured and obscured fraction of star formation. Figure 1 shows the ratio of unobscured versus obscured star formation, as probed by GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm, respectively, i.e., our reference calibrators of the unobscured and obscured star formation (see later), as a function of oxygen abundance for the DGS sample. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ρ, is computed from the IDL procedure r_correlate to quantify the degree of correlation between the oxygen abundance and the ratio of unobscured-versus-obscured star formation. Values of ρ close to +1 and 1 are indicative of a strong correlation or anti-correlation, respectively, while values approaching 0 imply the absence of any correlation. For the low metallicity (12 + log  (O/H) ≤ 7.8 − 7.9) galaxies of the DGS sample, the fraction of unobscured star formation starts to dominate (see the negative correlation in Fig. 1 with ρ = −0.50) and we, thus, need tracers of the unobscured and obscured fraction of star formation. The increased fraction of unobscured star formation toward lower metal abundances is in agreement with the drop in the ratio of the SFR estimated from the WISE band at 12 μm versus the SFR from Hα emission, SFRW3/SFRHα, with decreasing metallicity reported in Lee et al. (2013), which was attributed to the low dust-to-gas ratios of metal-poor galaxies (e.g., Rémy-Ruyer et al. 2014), making the reprocessing of UV photons by dust inefficient (Schurer et al. 2009; Hwang et al. 2012).

In this paper, we choose GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm as reference SFR tracers to probe the unobscured and obscured star formation component, respectively, and we rely on the SFR calibrations presented by Hao et al. (2011) and Murphy et al. (2011 see Table A.1). In Sect. A of the appendix, we motivate this choice of reference SFR calibrators by comparing different unobscured (GALEX FUV, Hα) and obscured (IRAC8 μm, MIPS 24 μm, LTIR, 1.4 GHz) SFR tracers for the DGS galaxy sample. Among the unobscured SFR diagnostics, we argue that the Hα line can provide better SFR estimates compared to FUV due to the limited range of ages to which the SFR calibration for Hα (~10 Myr) is sensitive compared to FUV (100 Myr). Given the bursty star formation histories and small sizes of dwarf galaxies, the underlying assumption of continuous star formation activity during the age range of the SFR calibrator is not fulfilled, which becomes worse for the FUV emission probing a longer timescale of star formation activity. The unavailability of Hα maps prevents us from determining the Hα emission that corresponds to the galaxy regions covered in our Herschel observations. The FUV emission is instead used as a reference SFR calibrator, but note that FUV might underestimate the SFR by 50% as compared to Hα (see Sect. A.2). The analysis in Sect. A.3 shows that IRAC 8 μm, LTIR, and L1.4 GHz are unreliable SFR tracers of the obscured SF fraction due to the dependence of PAH abundance on metallicity, the peculiar SED shapes and/or the burstiness of the star formation histories of metal-poor dwarfs. Although the MIPS 24 μm band emission might not be entirely free of metallicity effects and/or variations in (very small) grain abundance, the analysis of Sect. A.3 shows that MIPS 24 μm is linked more closely to the SFR over wide ranges of metallicity compared to the other obscured SFR diagnostics.

GALEX FUV data are processed in a similar way to that outlined in Cortese et al. (2012). The data are background subtracted and corrected for Galactic extinction according to the recalibrated AV in Schlafly et al. (2011) from Schlegel et al. (1998), as reported on the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), and assuming an extinction law with RV = 3.1 from Fitzpatrick et al. (1999). Spitzer MIPS data have been retrieved from the Herschel Database in Marseille (HeDaM3). Details of the data reduction of the ancillary MIPS data set can be found in Bendo et al. (2012b), along with aperture photometry techniques and results.

3. Spatially resolved SFRLline relation

3.1. Convolution and regridding of the maps

The closest galaxies in the DGS sample were mapped with Herschel to cover most of the star-forming regions and, therefore, can be used to provide a spatially resolved interpretation of the SFR calibrations. For the spatially resolved analysis, we consider all sources at distances D 7.5 Mpc with GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm observations4. A visual inspection of the MIPS 24 μm images shows that the mid-infrared emission from VII Zw 403, Mrk 209, UGC 4483, and NGC 625 is barely resolved with respect to the MIPS 24 μm beam (FWHM ~ 6″, Engelbracht et al. 2007), and, therefore, those galaxies are excluded from the sample for the spatially resolved analysis. We, therefore, end up with a subsample of seven well sampled galaxies with metal abundances varying from 0.10 Z (NGC 2366) to 0.38 Z (NGC 1705).

All maps of the resolved subsample have been convolved from their native resolution ([Oiii]88: 9.5, [Oi]63: 9.5; GALEX FUV: 6; MIPS 24 μm: 6) to the 12 resolution of PACS at 160 μm using the kernels presented in Aniano et al. (2011). Convolved images are rebinned to maps with pixel size corresponding to regions within galaxies of 1142 pc2, i.e., the size of a nominal pixel of 3.1333 at 7.5 Mpc. We caution that pixels of this size are not independent due to the shape of the beam (FWHM of 12), which is spread across several pixels within one galaxy. Since our main interest is the comparison of the behavior in the relations between the SFR and FIR line emission for different galaxies, we argue that a possible dependence of individual pixels for one specific galaxy will not severely affect the interpretation of our results. Given that the pixels defined this way correspond to a same physical scale within galaxies, the pixels provide a proxy for the surface density of the SFR, ΣSFR, and the FIR line surface density, Σline. Only pixels attaining surface brightness levels of signal-to-noise (S/N) higher than 5 are taken into consideration, neglecting the uncertainty from the calibration. Because of the proximity of NGC 6822 (D = 0.5 Mpc), the rebinning of pixels results in the absence of any region at sufficient S/N level, limiting the spatially resolved galaxy sample to six objects. For NGC 1705, the [Oi]63 line is not detected at sufficient S/N level on spatially resolved scales.

3.2. Observed trends

Figure 2 shows the relation between the SFR and [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 line emission for the subsample of spatially resolved galaxies. Different galaxies are color-coded according to their oxygen abundance. Since abundances are determined for global galaxies, they may not give representative values for the metal abundance on spatially resolved scales. For example, the inefficient ISM mixing of nebular and neutral gas might cause deviations from this global metallicity value on kiloparsec scales (Roy & Kunth 1995; Lebouteiller et al. 2004). Since the coverage in [Cii] is larger with respect to the areas mapped in [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 and/or the [Cii] line might attain higher S/N levels in some areas, the number of pixels with S/N> 5 is higher for [Cii] (1274 pixels) than for [Oi]63 (602) and [Oiii]88 (605) lines.

The SFR calibrations of spatially resolved regions are determined from Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares fitting using the IDL procedure MPFITFUN, which is based on the non-linear least-squares fitting package MPFIT (Markwardt 2009). The MPFITFUN procedure only accounts for the uncertainties on the SFR, which assumes that the line luminosities are error-free. While the line measurements are obviously affected by uncertainties inherent to the calibration and/or line fitting techniques, we prefer to account for the uncertainties on the SFR in the fitting procedure since the precision of the SFR estimate is affected by uncertainties on the reference SFR calibrators as well as the inaccuracy inherent to the applied reference SFR calibrators and, therefore, often larger than the uncertainties on the line measurements. Table 2 summarizes the results of the fitted SFR calibrations: logΣSFR=β+αlogΣline\begin{equation} \log~\Sigma_{\text{SFR}} = \beta + \alpha*\log \Sigma_{\text{line}} \end{equation}(1)where Σline is the FIR line surface density in units of  L kpc-2, ΣSFR is the star formation rate in units of M yr-1 pc-2, and α and β represent the slope and intercept of the best fit. We require that parameter α can be determined at a >5σ significance level to determine that two quantities (i.e., SFR and FIR line surface density) are correlated.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between surface densities of the SFR and [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), and [Oiii]88 (bottom) surface densities. The legend explains the symbols used for different galaxies with the color bar indicating the oxygen abundance. Representative error bars are indicated in the lower left corner. Uncertainties on the SFR include the errors on each of the SFR calibrators (GALEX FUV, MIPS 24 μm) as well as the average scatter in the calibrations used to convert to the SFR (see Table A.1). Uncertainties on the FIR line surface densities incorporate the errors due to line fitting as well as calibration uncertainties (taken conservatively as ~ 30%). The best fitting SFR calibration is presented as a solid, black line. The dispersion of data points around the SFR calibration is indicated at the top of each panel, with the number in parentheses indicating the scatter for the complete sample with >5σ detections for all three lines.

The observed trends in Fig. 2, in combination with the >5σ significance of the fitted slope of each trend, suggest a correlation between the SFR and [Cii], [Oi]63, [Oiii]88 line emission, which persists over almost two orders of magnitude in surface density. The smallest dispersion (0.21 dex) as well as the best constraint on the slope parameter with S/N ~ 50 is found for the [Oiii]88 line, suggesting that the [Oiii]88 line more tightly correlates with the SFR as compared to [Oi]63 (0.22 dex) and [Cii] (0.32 dex) lines on spatially resolved scales of ~100 pc. Comparing different galaxies, we observe consistent trends with similar slopes between the FIR line emission and SFR. Toward brighter regions, the slope of the SFRL[CII] relation appears to get steeper in most galaxies, suggesting that the [Cii] line is not the dominant coolant in dense star-forming regions, where other cooling lines ([Oi]63 or [Oiii]88) are favored given the density and ionization state of the gas (Lebouteiller et al. 2012). The steep slope (α = 1.41) in the spatially resolved SFRL[OI] relation suggests a sudden drop in the [Oi]63 emission for a decrease in star formation activity, while the flatter SFRL[CII] (α = 0.93) and SFRL[OIII] (α = 1.01) relations indicate that the [Cii] and [Oiii]88 lines remain bright in regions of relatively low SFRs. Given the high upper state energy and critical density for [Oi]63 (see Table 1), it is not surprising that bright [Oi]63 emission only occurs in warm and/or dense star-forming regions, where we expect to find the highest level of star formation activity.

A few galaxies (NGC 1705, NGC 2366, and NGC 4861) show diverging behavior in some of the SFR relations. NGC 1705 demonstrates a peculiar behavior in the SFRL[CII] and SFRL[OIII] relations with weaker line emission relative to its star formation rate. NGC 1705 is a dwarf starburst galaxy dominated by a central super star cluster (SSC) straddled by two dusty off-nuclear regions offset by ~250 pc that dominate the Hα, mid- and FIR emission of the galaxy (Cannon et al. 2006). The chemistry and heating of gas in the off-nuclear positions do not seem to be regulated directly by the central SSC (Cannon et al. 2006), but rather exposed to the emission of young, massive stars produced during a second starburst about 3 Myr ago, which was presumably induced by the expanding shell after the first central starburst (Annibali et al. 2009). The weak [Oiii]88 emission originates from the eastern dust complex, which shows bright [Cii] and PAH emission, suggesting that the deviation for the eastern regions of NGC 1705 could be due to a radiation field not strong enough to excite [Oiii]88 (requiring massive O6 and earlier-type stars). The western dust region does show bright [Oiii]88 emission, but has weak [Cii] and PAH emission. We, therefore, argue that the western dust complex is exposed to a harder radiation field, capable of destroying PAHs and ionizing the majority of the gas, which makes [Oiii]88 a more efficient coolant. The nondetection of [Oi]63, which is an efficient coolant of dense PDRs (see Table 1), might suggest rather diffuse ISM regions in the western and eastern dust emission complexes. Alternatively, optical depth effects might play a role in the two dusty off-nuclear regions. The behavior of NGC 2366 and NGC 4861 is mainly divergent in the SFRL[CII] and SFRL[OI] relations, whereas the [Oiii]88 emission correlates remarkably well with the SFR, suggesting that the gas around massive star clusters is mostly ionized and that PDRs only occupy a limited volume of the ISM.

Table 2

Overview of the calibration coefficients for SFR calibrations based on the spatially resolved (top) and global galaxy (bottom) DGS sample.

The different galaxies cover a wider range in the SFRΣline relations than is observed within one single object, suggesting that the dispersion in the SFRΣline relations is driven by the diversity on global galaxy scales rather than variations in the ISM conditions within individual objects. The SFRL[CII] relation is most affected by this different behavior of galaxies with a dispersion of 0.32 dex around the fitted SFR calibration. More metal-rich galaxies show lower star formation rates as traced by FUV+MIPS 24 μm than those predicted by our SFR calibration given their [Cii] emission. Sources with lower metal abundances, on the other hand, preferentially populate the part of the plot representative of weaker [Cii] emission and/or higher levels of star formation. Since the SFR based on FUV+MIPS 24 μm might be underestimated in more metal-poor dwarfs relative to the SFR calibrators Hα+MIPS 24 μm (see Sect. A.2), the offset of metal-poor dwarf galaxies in the SFRΣline relations might even be more pronounced. With a dispersion of 0.22 and 0.21 dex in the SFRL[OI] and SFRL[OIII] relations, respectively, the fine-structure lines [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 seem to depend less on the ISM conditions in galaxies and might, thus, be potentially better SFR indicators compared to [Cii].

Given that we probe different ISM phases, even on spatially resolved scales of ~100 pc, we try to better approximate the overall cooling budget through FIR lines by combining the surface densities of [Cii], [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88. For the combination of several FIR lines, we attempt to fit an SFR function of the form: logΣSFR=β+log(Σ[CII]α1+Σ[OI]α2+Σ[OIII]α3)\begin{equation} \label{eqfit} \log~\Sigma_{\text{SFR}} = \beta + \log\,\left(\Sigma_{\text{[CII]}}^{\alpha_{1}} + \Sigma_{\text{[OI]}}^{\alpha_{2}} + \Sigma_{\text{[OIII]}}^{\alpha_{3}}\right) \end{equation}(2)where Σline is the FIR line surface density in units of  L kpc-2, ΣSFR is the star formation rate in units of M yr-1 pc-2 and (α1, α2, α3), and β represent the slopes and intercept of the best fit.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between surface densities of the SFR and a combination of [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 surface densities. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 2.

In the fitting procedure, the different data points are equally weighted and the parameters (α1, α2, α3) of the slopes are constrained to positive numbers. Similar functions are defined to fit combinations of two FIR lines. Best fitting parameters (including calibration coefficients and dispersion) are only presented in Table 2 for line combinations that improved on the dispersion in the SFR calibrations for single FIR lines. By combining a number of FIR lines, we are able to significantly reduce the scatter (see Fig. 3), confirming the hypothesis that the total gas cooling balances the gas heating under the condition of local thermal equilibrium. This, furthermore, suggests that the specific processes that regulate the cooling in the different gas phases are of minor importance. Although the primary heating mechanisms are very different in the neutral gas phase (photoelectric effect and a variable contribution from cosmic rays and soft X-ray heating), as compared to ionized gas media (photoionization processes), the main goal is to get access to the total heating due to young stellar emission, irrespective of the dominant heating mechanism in different gas phases, by probing the total cooling budget in galaxies. In particular, the combinations [Cii] + [Oiii]88, [Oi]63 + [Oiii]88 and [Cii] + [Oi]63 + [Oiii]88 provide accurate estimates of the SFR, which suggests that the cooling in the neutral as well as ionized media needs to be probed to approximate the overall cooling budget in metal-poor galaxies and, thus, trace the star formation activity. However, heating mechanisms not directly linked to the recent star formation activity (e.g., soft X-ray heating, Silk & Werner 1969, which might become substantial in extremely low-metallicity galaxies, such as I Zw 18, Péquignot 2008 and Lebouteiller et al., in prep.) might disperse the link between the emission of cooling lines and the star formation rate (see also Sects. 3.3 and 4.2).

3.3. Scatter in the SFRLline relation

In this section, we analyze what is driving the dispersion in the SFRLline relations on spatially resolved scales within galaxies by analyzing the trends with several diagnostics for the physical conditions of the ISM. We quantify the dispersion in the SFRLline relations as the logarithmic distance between the SFR as estimated from the reference SFR calibration based on FUV and 24 μm emission and the best-fit line for the spatially resolved SFRLline relation.

First of all, we analyze a possible link between the scatter and FIR color as probed by the PACS 100 μm/PACS 160 μm flux density ratio obtained from dust continuum observations, considered a proxy of the dust temperature (or grain charging) under the assumption that the emission in both bands is heated by the same radiation field. Although different radiation fields, originating from star-forming regions or diffuse interstellar radiation, have been shown to contribute to the emission in FIR and submillimeter wavebands (e.g., Bendo et al. 2012a), the dust emission in dwarf galaxies seems to be primarily due to heating by young stars, even at wavelengths >160 μm (Galametz et al. 2010; Bendo et al. 2012a).

Figure 4 displays the observed trends between FIR color and dispersion in the SFRLline relations for [Cii] (top panel) and [Oi] (bottom panel). The data reduction of PACS 100 and 160 μm photometry maps is described in Rémy-Ruyer et al. (2013). The dispersion in the SFRL[CII] relation (ρ = 0.67) clearly correlates with the FIR colors of galaxy regions in the sense that the fine-structure line [Cii] does not seem well suited as an SFR indicator toward warm FIR colors. Low-metallicity galaxies often have warm FIR colors (e.g., Thuan et al. 1999; Houck et al. 2004; Galametz et al. 2009, 2011; Rémy-Ruyer et al. 2013), which could explain why galaxies such as NGC 2366 and NGC 4861 show an offset in the SFRL[CII] relation compared to more metal-rich galaxies. For increasing dust temperatures, the grain charging parameter increases and, therefore, the photoelectric heating efficiency decreases, diminishing the line cooling. We observe a similar but more moderate correlation with FIR color for [Oi]63 (ρ = 0.51). Similar plots for [Oiii]88 are not shown here, since the line emission arises from the ionized gas component, where photoionization processes dominate the heating and no physical motivation exists for a correlation with FIR color.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] (top) and [Oi]63 (bottom) as a function of FIR color, i.e., PACS 100 μm/PACS 160 μm. The legend explains the symbols used for different galaxies with the color bar indicating the oxygen abundance. Representative error bars are indicated in the lower left corner. Uncertainties on the SFR include the errors on each of the SFR calibrators (GALEX FUV, MIPS 24 μm) as well as the average scatter in the reference calibration (see Table A.1). Uncertainties on the PACS line ratios incorporate the errors due to map-making as well as calibration uncertainties (5%). The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients are presented in the top right corner. In parentheses, we show the dispersion for the complete galaxy sample, i.e., galaxy regions that have >5σ detections for all three lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88.

Figure 5 shows the behavior of the scatter in the SFRL[CII] relation as a function of FIR line ratios [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (top) and [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (bottom). With an upper state energy Eu/k ~ 228 K and critical density ncrit,H ~ 5 × 105 cm-3 for [Oi]63 as compared to Texc ~ 91 K and ncrit,H ~ 1.6 × 103 cm-3 for [Cii], the [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 ratio can be interpreted as a proxy for the relative fraction of warm and/or dense gas, which increases toward higher values of [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63. Indeed, PDR models have shown that this ratio increases toward higher gas density and radiation field strength (Kaufman et al. 2006). With [Oiii]88 emission originating from highly-ionized regions near young O stars, the [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 ratio can be interpreted as a proxy for the relative contribution of the ionized gas phase with higher values implying large filling factors of diffuse highly ionized gas with respect to neutral media. The latter interpretations of line ratios are based on the assumption that most of the [Cii] emission arises from PDRs rather than diffuse ionized gas media and also that [Oi]63 emission can be identified merely with PDRs. The interpretation of this line ratio might differ for low-metallicity galaxies, however, where the filling factors of PDRs are considered to be low based on the weak emission of several PDR tracers (e.g., PAH, CO). High [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 line ratios in dust deficient objects might, thus, have a different origin than warm and/or dense PDRs. Péquignot (2008) have shown that low-ionization line emission in neutral gas media can be produced by a pseudo-PDR with similar lines as PDRs, but with soft X-rays as the dominant heating mechanism (see also Lebouteiller et al., in prep).

There is a clear correlation (ρ = 0.74) between the [Oi]63/[Cii]+[Oi]63 line ratios and the observed scatter in the SFRL[CII] relation indicating that regions with higher values of [Oi]63/[Cii]+[Oi]63 are offset in the SFR relation toward weaker [Cii] emission for a certain SFR. This implies that [Cii] is not the most appropriate SFR indicator in those regions. Higher values of [Oi]63/[Cii]+[Oi]63 occur preferentially in galaxies of lower metal abundance (e.g., NGC 2366, NGC 4861), which might suggest that the importance of the photoelectric effect diminishes in dust deficient environments and other heatings mechanisms (e.g., soft X-ray heating) become more efficient.

With the [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 ratio (see bottom panel of Fig. 5) covering almost two orders of magnitude, we sample very distinct ISM conditions on hectoparsec scales within spatially resolved galaxies. The clear correlation of [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 with the scatter in the SFRL[CII] relation (ρ = 0.87) implies that the [Cii] line is not a good tracer of the star formation activity in regions where the ionized gas phase occupies an important part of the ISM volume. Although the [Cii] line could also regulate the cooling in ionized gas media in addition to being the dominant coolant in neutral PDRs, the harder radiation field at lower metallicities will produce hard photons capable of ionizing O+ (IP = 35.1 eV). Since the ionization potential of C+ is only 24.4 eV, carbon might thus easily become doubly ionized in diffuse ionized gas media resulting in most of the carbon being locked in C++ rather than C+. In particular, metal-poor regions seem affected by large filling factors of highly ionized media, casting doubt on the ability of [Cii] to trace the SFR in those environments.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] as a function of [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (top) and [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (bottom) line ratios. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 4.

4. Global galaxy SFRLline relation

In the previous section, we analyzed the observed trends and scatter in the SFRLline relations for a subsample of spatially resolved galaxies down to hectoparsec scales. We now verify whether the trends and scatter remain present on global galaxy scales, when averaged out over the different ISM phases. For this analysis, we consider all galaxies with GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm observations (32 out of 48 galaxies), including the resolved sources from Sect. 3 with their line and continuum flux measurements reduced to one data point. The extension of the subsample of spatially resolved galaxies to the entire DGS sample broadens the range covered in metallicity from 0.03 Z (I Zw 18) to 0.5 Z (HS 2352+2733) and in SFR from 0.001 M yr-1 (UGC 4483) to 43 M yr-1 (Haro 11) as traced by FUV + 24 μm.

4.1. Global fluxes

For global galaxy fluxes of FIR lines, we rely on the aperture photometry results for fine-structure lines reported in Cormier et al. (2012), where FIR line fluxes within apertures covering the brightest fine-structure line emission are computed. We assume a 30% calibration error on top of the uncertainties that result from line fitting. In some cases, the [Cii] emission is more extended with respect to the [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 emission or is simply observed across a wider field, in which case the [Cii] apertures are bigger to include the total region mapped. Here, we measure the [Cii] flux within the same apertures as the [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 emission for six galaxies using the same techniques as Cormier et al. (2012). For NGC 6822, we only include the FIR line measurements from the Hii region Hubble V, since it is the only area in NGC 6822 covered in all three lines.

Corresponding GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm fluxes are obtained from aperture photometry using the central positions and aperture sizes applied to the FIR fine-structure lines. Table B.1 gives an overview of the aperture photometry results for GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm bands. For point sources, GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm measurements usually correspond to total galaxy fluxes. Total MIPS 24 μm fluxes for point sources are adopted from Bendo et al. (2012b) and are indicated with an asterisk in Col. 5 of Table B.1. In some cases, the FUV data show an extended tail of emission (HS 1442+4250, UGC 04483, UM 133) with no counterpart in MIPS 24 μm nor PACS maps. Rather than measuring the global FUV emission for these galaxies with a cometary structure, we rely on aperture photometry within apertures that encompass the brightest 24 μm emission features. In this manner, we avoid overestimating the total SFR for these galaxies by neglecting the FUV emission that was either not covered in our Herschel observations or did not show any dust emission, suggesting that little dust is present in those areas. Table B.1 reports the FUV flux densities within those apertures, but also provides in parentheses the photometry results for apertures encompassing the total FUV emission.

thumbnail Fig. 6

Relation between the SFR and [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), and [Oiii]88 (bottom) luminosities on global galaxy scales. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The best-fit SFR calibration is presented as a solid, black line. The dispersion of data points around the SFR calibration is indicated at the top of each panel, with the number in parentheses indicating the scatter for the complete sample with >5σ detections for all three lines.

4.2. Observed trends

Figure 6 presents the SFRLline relations on global galaxy scales for DGS sources with GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm observations. Based on the observed trends, SFR calibrations are derived from linear regression fits: logSFR=β+αlogLline.\begin{equation} \label{func1} \log~{\it SFR} = \beta + \alpha*\log L_{\text{line}}. \end{equation}(3)where Lline is the FIR line luminosity in units of  L, SFR is the star formation rate in units of M yr-1, and α and β represent the slope and intercept of the best fit. Table 2 (see bottom part) summarizes the calibration coefficients (slope, intercept) retrieved from the fits and the dispersion of data points around the best fit.

With the slopes of all best-fit lines determined with at least 5σ significance, we are confident that the SFR also correlates with the [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 line emission on global scales. The smallest dispersion (0.25 dex) and strongest constraint on the slope (S/N ~ 19) could be obtained for the [Oi]63 line, from which the SFR can be estimated with an uncertainty factor of 1.8. The [Oiii]88 line probes the SFR within an uncertainty factor of 2, while the link between the SFR and [Cii] line is more dispersed and results in an estimated SFR uncertain by a factor of ~2.4. The top panel of Figure 6 includes previous SFR calibrations reported in De Looze et al. (2011)5 (dashed red line) and Sargsyan et al. (2012) (blue dashed-dotted line). The SFRL[Cii] calibration derived for the DGS sample6 has a shallower slope (α = 0.84) compared to the nearly one-to-one correlation obtained in De Looze et al. (2011) and Sargsyan et al. (2012), which can be attributed to a decreasing [Cii] emission toward lower metal abundances. For [Cii] and [Oiii]88, the SFR seems qualitatively linked in the same way to the line emission on global galaxy and spatially resolved scales. On spatially resolved scales, the slope of the SFR calibrations for [Oi]63 (α = 1.41) differs from the correlation observed on global galaxy scales (α = 0.94).

Compared to the dispersion in the spatially resolved SFRLline relations, the averaging over the different ISM phases on global galaxy scales does not reduce the scatter in the observed SFRLline trends. This again shows that the dispersion in the SFR relations is not driven by variations within one single galaxy, but rather originates from the diversity of ISM conditions in a large sample of galaxies covering wide ranges in metallicity. The dispersion is largest in the SFRL[CII] trend (0.38 dex) as compared to the SFRL[OIII] (0.30 dex) and SFRL[OI] (0.25 dex) relations. For a sample of similar size (24 galaxies), the SFR calibration for [Cii] presented in De Looze et al. (2011) reports a 1σ dispersion of only 0.27 dex. Part of the increased scatter observed for the DGS sample might be attributed to the uncertainties on the reference SFR tracer, which was shown to be sensitive to the star formation history and, possibly, the grain properties of metal-poor dwarf galaxies (see Sects. A.2 and A.3). We argue, however, that the significant scatter in the SFRL[Cii] relation indicates a large variety of ISM conditions (i.e., gas density, radiation field, filling factors of neutral and ionized gas, excitation conditions) probed in the DGS galaxy sample (see Sect. 4.3). This diversity might not be surprising given the different morphological classifications (e.g. blue compact dwarfs, low-surface brightness objects, luminous infrared galaxies, interacting galaxies) of the dwarf galaxies in the DGS sample.

On global galaxy scales, the [Oi]63 line is considered a better intrinsic tracer of the SFR for the DGS sample compared to [Cii] and [Oiii]88, which suggests that the fraction of gas heating in warm and/or dense PDRs is a good approximation of the level of star formation activity across a wide range of metallicities. We caution that the [Oi]63 emission in extremely metal deficient objects is not necessarily linked to the classical PDRs, but might rather be powered by soft X-rays (e.g. Péquignot 2008; Lebouteiller et al., in prep.).

thumbnail Fig. 7

Relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), [Oiii]88 (bottom) as a function of oxygen abundance, 12 +log  (O/H), on global galaxy scales. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients are indicated in the top right corner. In parentheses, we show the dispersion for the complete galaxy sample, i.e., global galaxies that have >5σ detections for all three lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88.

To better approximate the overall gas cooling budget in galaxies, and, hereby, the heating through star formation under the assumption of local thermal equilibrium, we attempt to fit SFR calibrations with different combinations of FIR lines of the form: logSFR=β+log(L[CII]α1+L[OI]α2+L[OIII]α3).\begin{equation} \label{eqfit4} \log~{\it SFR} = \beta + \log\left(L_{\text{[CII]}}^{\alpha_{1}} + L_{\text{[OI]}}^{\alpha_{2}} + L_{\text{[OIII]}}^{\alpha_{3}}\right). \end{equation}(4)By combining the emission of two or three FIR lines (Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88), we do not improve on the scatter in the SFR calibrations on global galaxy scales. The combination of the brightest FIR lines on spatially resolved scales of about 100 pc did diminish the scatter in the SFRLline relations, suggesting that other cooling lines (potentially in the optical wavelength domain) and/or gas heating mechanisms (unrelated to star formation) become important on global galaxy scales.

4.3. Scatter in the SFRLline relation

In this section, we focus on identifying the parameters that drive the dispersion in the SFRLline relations. Figures 79 show the observed trends between the scatter in the SFRLline relations and the metal abundance, dust temperature, and ISM structure as probed through the line ratios [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63, respectively. The dust temperatures of 25 out of 32 galaxies are constrained by the results from a modified blackbody fitting routine with variable dust emissivity index β presented in Rémy-Ruyer et al. (2013).

thumbnail Fig. 8

Relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] (top), and [Oi]63 (bottom) as a function of dust temperature, Tdust, on global galaxy scales. The galaxy I Zw 18 was not detected at PACS 160 μm wavelengths and, therefore, the fitting procedure was not attempted in Rémy-Ruyer et al. (2013). Herrera-Camus et al. (2012) estimated a lower limit for the dust temperature Td ≥ 33.7 K based on the PACS 70 μm flux and PACS 160 μm upper limit, which is used to indicate the position of I Zw 18 in the plots of Fig. 4. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 7.

thumbnail Fig. 9

Relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] as a function of [Oi]/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (top) and [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (bottom) line ratios, on global galaxy scales. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 7.

The shallow slope in the SFR calibrations for the DGS sample (as compared to the slopes for the literature sample in Sect. 5) and the weak correlations in Fig. 7 (ρ = −0.44 for [Cii], ρ = −0.35 for [Oi]63, and ρ = −0.36 for [Oiii]88) suggest that the metal abundance has an effect on the quantitative link between the SFR and FIR line emission (in particular for [Cii]). The true offset of the lowest abundance dwarfs might be even higher because of an underestimation of their SFR based on FUV emission (see discussion in Sect. A.2). The weaker [Cii] emission toward lower metal abundances is consistent with the drop in [Cii] surface brightness in PDR models by a factor of about 5 from metallicities of 12 + log  (O/H) ~ 8.5 down to 12 + log  (O/H) ~ 7.5 (Röllig et al. 2006), (i.e., drop of a factor of 10 in metallicity) for a single cloud with density nH ~ 103 cm-3 (see their Fig. 6). The weak trends for [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 are mainly driven by two galaxies of extreme low metal abundance, I Zw 18 and SBS 0335-052, in which the [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 lines do not seem to add significantly to the overall gas cooling. Since the SFR is unlikely to be overestimated for these galaxies based on FUV+MIPS 24 μm (see comparison with other SFR tracers in Sect. A of the Appendix), the offset of these extremely dust deficient galaxies might suggest that other lines dominate the cooling processes (e.g., Ly α). The gas heating might, alternatively, be dominated by heating mechanisms other than the photoelectric effect (e.g., soft X-ray heating, mechanical heating, cosmic rays), which could disperse the link between the emission of cooling lines and the SFR. For I Zw 18, the heating has indeed been shown to be dominated by soft X-ray heating (Péquignot 2008; Lebouteiller et al., in prep.), which is likely to also affect the SFRLline relations.

The dust temperatures of galaxies seem to correlate (weakly) with the dispersion in the SFR calibration for [Cii] (ρ = 0.47) and [Oi]63 (ρ = 0.44). The global galaxy analysis, hereby, confirms the trends observed in Fig. 4 on spatially resolved galaxy scales. With the DGS sources showing a trend of increasing dust temperature with decreasing metal abundance (Rémy-Ruyer et al. 2013), the correlation of the dispersion in the SFRL[CII] and SFRL[OI] relations with dust temperature seems, at least in part, to be related to the metallicity of DGS sources.

The dispersion in the SFRL[CII] relation clearly correlates with the [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 line ratio (ρ = 0.75), while a trend is also present, although less obvious, for [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (ρ = 0.43). Making similar plots for the dispersion in the SFR relation for [Oi]63 as a function of [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (ρ = 0.35) does not reveal a clear trend (graph is not shown here), suggesting that the [Oi]63 line is capable of tracing the SFR in a consistent way irrespective of changes in the ISM structure.

To understand the observed trends between the scatter in the SFRLline relations and several physical parameters, we try to link the low abundance to the warm dust temperatures and different ISM structure observed in low-metallicity galaxies. In low-abundance galaxies, the fraction of metals is lower in the solid as well as gas phase. The lower abundance of grains, however, does not directly cause a decrease in the photoelectric heating efficiency, since it is, at least partially, compensated by a higher heating rate in dwarf galaxies, exhibited by their hotter average temperature (e.g., Rémy-Ruyer et al. 2013). Similarly, the lower abundances of C and O in the gas phase will be balanced by higher line cooling rates. Deficits of species like C and N could, however, occur relative to the O/H abundance which is used here to measure metallicity via the relative O abundance. This could result in relatively less cooling provided by the C lines.

The photon escape fraction might become more important with decreasing metallicity due to the porosity of the ISM, which lowers the energy input for the heating of dust and gas through the photoelectric effect. Other than higher photon escape fractions, the hard radiation fields in low-metallicity environments can also enhance grain charging, making grains less efficient for the photoelectric effect (e.g., Tielens & Hollenbach 1985a; Malhotra et al. 1997; Negishi et al. 2001; Croxall et al. 2012; Farrah et al. 2013).

Indeed, stars at lower metallicities have higher effective temperatures due to line blanketing effects. For a given stellar age and mass, they will produce more hard photons than at solar luminosities. Because of the longer mean free path lengths of UV photons in dust deficient media, the ionization of gas and participation in the gas/dust heating persist over large distances from the ionizing sources in star-forming complexes, which furthermore increases the dust temperatures. As a consequence of the longer distances traversed by ionizing photons, the C+-emitting zone in galaxies can be enlarged compared to higher metallicity environments due to the deeper penetration of FUV photons capable of photodissociating CO molecules (e.g., Poglitsch et al. 1995; Israel et al. 1996; Madden et al. 1997; Israel & Maloney 2011). Also, the filling factor of ionized gas phases will enlarge due to the hardness of the radiation field and the transparency of the ISM in low-metallicity objects.

Grain properties might, furthermore, vary in objects of lower metal abundance. The PAH emission has been shown to decrease below 12 + log  (O/H) ~ 8.1 (Boselli et al. 2004; Engelbracht et al. 2005; Jackson et el. 2006; Madden et al. 2006; Draine et al. 2007; Engelbracht et al. 2008; Galliano et al. 2008), while the abundance of very small grains grows drastically relative to the large grain population due to the fragmentation of those large grains through shocks experienced in the turbulent ISM (Jones et al. 1996; Lisenfeld et al. 2002; Galliano et al. 2003, 2005). Knowing that PAHs and very small grains are the main contributors to the photoelectric effect, the outcome on the gas heating efficiency and the subsequent gas cooling remains a puzzle.

In summary, we argue that the best SFR tracer varies for different environments depending on the density and ionization state of the gas. Due to the hardness of the radiation field and longer mean free path lengths in metal-poor galaxies, the filling factors of ionized gas media are bound to grow drastically, resulting in [Cii] and [Oi]63 being poor SFR diagnostics. In such highly ionized regions, we expect most of the carbon and oxygen to be locked in elements with higher ionization potentials. The [Cii] and [Oi]63 line emission might, furthermore, be affected by a decrease in the photoelectric efficiency due to higher photon escape fractions and/or grain charging. The reliability of [Oiii]88 as an SFR indicator mainly relies on the filling factor of diffuse, highly ionized gas. The large range covered in [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (from 0.4 to 0.6) suggests that the relative filling factors of PDRs and ionized media can differ significantly from one galaxy to another, depending on the hardness of the radiation field, excitation conditions, and the filling factor of low-density gas relative to compact gas clumps. The choice of a reference SFR tracer would, thus, benefit from knowledge of the ionization state and density of the gas. Without any precursory constraints on the ISM conditions, the [Oi]63 line is considered to be the most reliable SFR indicator for galaxies covering a wide range in metal abundances.

5. Prescriptions for extending the SFR calibrations to other galaxy samples

In this section, we derive SFR calibrations for different galaxy populations. Hereto, we gather FIR fine-structure line measurements from the literature for dwarf galaxies, starbursts, ULIRGs, galaxies harboring an AGN, and high-redshift galaxies (ranging from z = 0.5 to 6.6). The entire galaxy sample constitutes of 530, 150, and 102 galaxies with [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 detections, respectively.

5.1. Literature sample

The literature sample of the local Universe (z< 0.5) was assembled from FIR line measurements published based on ISO observations in Brauher et al. (2008, 83 galaxies) and Herschel data in Parkin et al. (2013, 1 galaxy), Sargsyan et al. (2012, 101 galaxies), Díaz-Santos et al. (2013, 206 galaxies), Farrah et al. (2013, 24 galaxies), Graciá-Carpio et al. (2011, in prep., 56 galaxies). Where duplications exist between ISO and Herschel spectroscopy, we choose the Herschel data (see Sect. A.4 for a comparison between Herschel and ISO spectroscopy measurements.). For the Brauher et al. (2008) sample of ISO observations, we consider all galaxies with emission unresolved with respect to the ISO beam. While De Looze et al. (2011) only considered galaxies with GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm observations, we extend the literature sample to 84 galaxies from the Brauher et al. (2008) sample with IRAS 12, 25, 60, and 100 μm flux measurements from which the TIR luminosity and, thus, the SFR can be computed. Although some of the galaxies from the Brauher et al. (2008) sample have been observed with Herschel, the lack of their published FIR line fluxes led to the usage of the ISO flux measurements. All the literature works of Herschel observations present the FIR line measurements of all three lines of interest ([Cii], [Oi]63, [Oiii]88), with the exception of Sargsyan et al. (2012) and Díaz-Santos et al. (2013)7 reporting only [Cii] measurements. The Great Observatories All-sky LIRG Survey (GOALS) sample (Díaz-Santos et al. 2013) was complemented with data from other Herschel programs. We exclude sources already presented in Sargsyan et al. (2012) and Graciá-Carpio et al. (in prep.) (and, thus, already part of our literature sample), resulting in 206 sources of the original GOALS sample.

FIR line detections and upper limits for high-redshift galaxies8 are gathered for fine-structure lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 based on observations with a wide variety of ground-based facilities and the Herschel Space Observatory. To convert redshifts to luminosity distances, we use the NED cosmology calculator (Wright 2006), assuming a spatially flat cosmology with H0 = 67.3 km s-1 Mpc-1, Ωλ = 0.685 and Ωm = 0.315 (Planck Collaboration XVI 2014).

5.2. Source classification

We classify galaxies as dwarfs if the criterion LH< 109.6LH,⊙ is fulfilled, similar to the selection procedure applied in Boselli et al. (2008). We do not distinguish between the different classifications of dwarf galaxies (e.g., blue compact dwarfs, late-type spirals, Magellanic irregulars).

For the more massive galaxy populations, we make a distinction between the dominant power source for infrared emission, i.e., star formation or AGN activity. To homogenize the classification of starburst, composite, and AGN sources for the different literature datasets, we adapt the source classification of Sargsyan et al. (2012) to the selection criteria used in Díaz-Santos et al. (2013) based on the equivalent width (EW) of the mid-infrared PAH feature at 6.2 μm. More specifically, galaxies are considered to be AGN-dominated if EW (PAH 6.2 μm) 0.3 and classified as pure starburst if EW (PAH 6.2 μm) ≳ 0.5. Galaxies characterized by intermediate equivalent width values are considered composite sources, i.e., with starburst and AGN contributions to the mid-infrared features. Applying these selection criteria results in the classification of 94 composite/AGN sources and seven starburst galaxies from the galaxy sample presented in Sargsyan et al. (2012), among which 19 can be classified as ULIRGs. The GOALS sample consists of 129 starburst galaxies and 77 AGN or composite sources, among which two can be assigned ULIRGs. Based on the optical source classification of Farrah et al. (2013), we identify six Hii-dominated/starburst galaxies and 18 LINER/Seyfert galaxies. For the Brauher et al. (2008) sample, we use an optical classification similar to De Looze et al. (2011) to distinguish between purely star-forming objects (37 Hii/starburst galaxies) and objects with power sources other than star formation (36 transition/LINER/Seyfert galaxies). Galaxies with no or uncertain object classifications in NED were omitted from our sample. The Brauher et al. (2008) sample, furthermore, includes ten dwarf galaxies. Based on the optical source classification for the SHINING sample (Survey with Herschel of the Interstellar medium in Nearby infrared Galaxies, Fischer et al. 2010; Sturm et al. 2010; Graciá-Carpio et al. 2011, in prep.), we identify 20 starburst galaxies and 36 composite or AGN sources, among which 21 objects fulfill the criterion for ULIRGs (LIR> 1012 L). We classify the central region of M 51 as Hii-dominated, since Parkin et al. (2013) argue that the AGN in M 51 does not significantly affect the excitation of gas.

To verify that the optical source classification is consistent with the classification based on the EW of the mid-infrared PAH feature at 6.2 μm, we compare the results for a subsample of 19 galaxies from the SHINING sample with measurements of EW (PAH 6.2 μm) reported in Stierwalt et al. (2013) for all objects of the GOALS sample. The optical classification coincides with the limits in EW (PAH 6.2 μm) to distinguish between pure starbursts and composite/AGN sources, with the exception of five ULIRGs. The high level of obscuration in ULIRGs impedes the classification, but since we treat ULIRGs as a separate population with LIR> 1012 L distinct from starburst and composite/AGN galaxies with lower infrared luminosities, we are confident that the different methods applied for the source classification are consistent for galaxies with LIR< 1012 L.

5.3. Reference SFR calibrator

For dwarf galaxies, we estimate the SFR from the same combination of (un)obscured SFR tracers (GALEX FUV) used for the DGS sample (see Sect. 2.3). We use the GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm flux measurements reported in De Looze et al. (2011), when available. For the remaining sources, we retrieve GALEX FUV fluxes from the GALEX catalog9. Catalog FUV measurements have been corrected for Galactic extinction according to the recalibrated AV in Schlafly et al. (2011) from Schlegel et al. (1998), as reported on NED, and assuming an extinction law with RV = 3.1 derived in Fitzpatrick et al. (1999). Relying on the conclusions drawn in Kennicutt et al. (2009) for the Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxies Survey (SINGS), we assume that the emission from MIPS 24 μm and IRAS 25 μm can be used interchangeably. We collect IRAS 25 μm flux densities from the IRAS Revised Bright Galaxy Sample (Sanders et al. 2003) or, alternatively, from the IRAS Faint Source Catalog (Moshir & et al. 1990).

For all other galaxies in the literature sample, we estimate the star formation rates based on the TIR luminosity (LTIR10, 81000 μm) and the SFR calibration reported in Hao et al. (2011); Murphy et al. (2011) (see also Table A.1). Total infrared luminosities are reported in Sargsyan et al. (2012) and Farrah et al. (2013). For the SHINING sample, we compute FIR (42.5122.5 μm) luminosities from the Herschel continuum flux densities at 63 and 122 μm, which could be determined based on a proper continuum estimation from the [Oi]63 and [Nii]122 line observations (see Graciá-Carpio et al. in prep.). Constraining the FIR luminosities in this manner (rather than relying on the total IRAS flux densities to compute FIR) allows us to determine the infrared emission within the same regions as the PACS line observations, preventing any overestimation of the SFR for galaxies only partly covered by Herschel spectroscopy observations. For the Brauher et al. (2008) sample, we use the IRAS flux densities at 12, 25, 60, and 100 μm to compute the TIR luminosity based on the formulas from Sanders & Mirabel (1996). Similarly, the IRAS 60 and 100 μm flux densities are used to compute LFIR and converted to LTIR using a correction factor of 1.75 for the GOALS sample. The SFR in M 51 is estimated from the total infrared luminosity in the central 80 region, reported in Parkin et al. (2013).

Table 3

Prescriptions to estimate the SFR from the relation log SFR [M yr-1] = β + α × log Lline [ L] depending on galaxy type, i.e., metal-poor dwarf galaxies, Hii/starburst galaxies, composite, or AGN sources, ULIRGs, and high-redshift galaxies.

Table B.2 summarizes the FIR line measurements obtained from the literature and quotes LTIR and SFR of high-redshift sources derived in this manner. Since the uncertainties in the line and FIR luminosities (and thus SFR estimates) for high-redshift galaxies depend strongly on the uncertainty of their assumed distance, relying on a specific cosmological model with underlying uncertainties, as well as a possible magnification factor for lensed sources, we safely assume a conservative uncertainty of 50% in both the line luminosity and SFR estimate.

Tables B.3B.5 give an overview of the galaxies classified as dwarfs, Hii/starburst, and AGN, respectively, and indicate their name, luminosity distance DL, reference for their FIR line measurements, total infrared luminosity (81000 μm), and SFR. In both tables, ULIRGs are indicated with an asterisk behind their name.

5.4. SFRLline calibrations

For the sample of literature data, we derive SFR calibrations for each of the fine-structure lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88, as well as combinations of all lines based on the IDL procedure MPFITFUN and similar functions as defined in Eqs. (3) and (4). To identify a correlation between the SFR and FIR line luminosities, we again require that the parameter α is determined at the >5σ significance level. The best-fit SFR calibrations are presented in Table 3 for each of the different galaxy populations along with the number of galaxies used for the calibration, the slope, and intercept of the best-fit line and the dispersion (or the uncertainty on the SFR estimate in parentheses). The SFR calibrations for the entire galaxy sample allow us to compare the different FIR lines and their applicability to trace the star formation across a large sample of galaxy populations. Although all correlations are significant, the large dispersion in the SFRLline relations (ranging from 0.42 to 0.66 dex) immediately tells us that [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 are fairly unreliable SFR tracers when calibrated for the entire literature sample. In particular, the link of the [Oiii]88 emission with the SFR appears to depend strongly on galaxy type.

To improve the applicability of each of the FIR lines as an SFR diagnostic, we derive separate SFR calibrations for each of the different galaxy populations in the literature sample, i.e., dwarf galaxies, Hii/starburst galaxies, composite/AGN sources, ULIRGs and high-redshift galaxies. All galaxy subpopulations are exclusive, i.e., the ULIRG population consists of starburst, composite and AGN galaxies, but the starburst and AGN samples do not contain ULIRGs to prevent SFR calibrations biased by the line deficits observed in ULIRGs. For every galaxy population, we attempted to fit a combination of FIR emission lines to probe the SFR (according to formula 4) with the aim of decreasing the scatter in the SFR calibrations. The majority of line combinations did not result in an improvement of the scatter, suggesting that other FIR cooling lines are necessary to supplement the [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 emission and, thus, trace a more complete cooling budget. While the three fine-structure lines ([Cii], [Oi]63, [Oiii]88) under investigation in this paper are the brightest FIR lines in our sample of metal-poor dwarfs, other composite line tracers might be more appropriate for high-energy sources like AGNs, starbursts, and ULIRGs (e.g., [Nii]122,205, [Niii]57, higher-J CO lines,...). Farrah et al. (2013) find that [Oi]63,145 and [Nii]122 are the most reliable SFR tracers for a sample of ULIRGs, while Zhao et al. (2013) have shown that [Nii]205 is a potentially powerful SFR indicator in local luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs) as well as in the more distant Universe.

5.5. Prescriptions for different galaxy populations

Compared to the scatter in the SFR calibrations for the entire literature sample, the dispersion for each of the separate galaxy populations is significantly reduced (see Table 3). Given that the dispersion in the SFR relations also differs significantly among galaxy populations and for the different FIR lines, the correlation between the SFR and FIR lines is clearly dependent on galaxy type. As a guideline, we briefly summarize the reliability of the three FIR fine-structure lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 to trace the SFR in each of the following galaxy populations. In case knowledge of the source classification is lacking, the calibrations derived for the [Cii] and [Oi]63 lines for the entire source sample (see top part of Table 3) will provide the most reliable SFR estimates with an uncertainty of factor 2.6.

5.5.1. Metal-poor dwarf galaxies

The most reliable estimate of the SFR in metal-poor dwarf galaxies can be derived from the [Oi]63 luminosity following the calibration: logSFR=6.23+0.91×logL[OI],\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -6.23 + 0.91 \times \log L_{\text{[OI]}}, \end{equation}(5)with an uncertainty factor of ~1.9. The star formation activity can be traced with an uncertainty of factor ~2 and ~2.3 from the [Oiii]88 and [Cii] lines, respectively, based on: logSFR=6.71+0.92×logL[OIII],\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -6.71 + 0.92 \times \log L_{\text{[OIII]}}, \end{equation}(6)and logSFR=5.73+0.80×logL[CII].\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -5.73 + 0.80 \times \log\, L_{\text{[CII]}}. \end{equation}(7)All SFR calibrations for metal-poor dwarf galaxies have shallower slopes compared to the entire literature sample, due to their decreasing FIR line luminosity toward lower metal abundances (see Sect. 4.3).

thumbnail Fig. 10

Left: SFR calibrations based on a literature sample of different galaxy populations for FIR fine-structure lines ([Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), [Oiii]88 (bottom). DGS dwarf galaxies, Hii/starburst galaxies and composite, LINER or AGN sources are presented as red diamonds, blue asterisks, and purple triangles, respectively. ULIRGs with LFIR> 1012 L are indicated as orange crosses. High-redshift sources can be identified as green squares while upper limits for high-redshift objects are shown as black arrows. The solid black line shows the best-fit relation for the entire galaxy sample, while the dashed red, cyan, purple, orange, and green curves represent the SFR calibrations derived for separate galaxy populations, i.e., dwarf galaxies, starbursts, AGNs, ULIRGs, and high-redshift sources, respectively. The 1σ dispersion of the entire galaxy sample around the best fit is indicated in the bottom right corner of each panel. Right: dispersion plots indicating the logarithmic distance between the SFR estimates obtained from the reference SFR tracer and the FIR line emission. The 1σ dispersion of the entire literature sample is indicated as dashed black lines. The top panel also includes previous SFR calibrations reported in De Looze et al. (2011) (dotted red line) and Sargsyan et al. (2012) (dash-dotted blue line).

5.5.2. Starburst galaxies

The [Cii] and [Oi]63 lines can estimate the SFR in starburst galaxies within uncertainty factors of 1.9 and 1.6 following the calibrations: logSFR=7.06+1.00×logL[CII]\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -7.06 + 1.00 \times \log\, L_{\text{[CII]}} \end{equation}(8)and logSFR=6.05+0.89×logL[OI].\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -6.05+ 0.89 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OI]}}. \end{equation}(9)The SFR calibration for [Cii] is not very different from previous calibrations obtained by De Looze et al. (2011) and Sargsyan et al. (2012) for normal-star-forming galaxies and starbursts (see Fig. 10), which suggests that the [Cii] line is linked to star formation in all galaxies extending from low levels of star formation activity (SFR ~ 0.1 M yr-1) to extremely active starbursts (SFR ~ 100 M yr-1).

For [Oiii]88, we only have nine [Oiii]88 line fluxes from Herschel after excluding the ISO measurements, resulting in the following SFR calibration with an uncertainty factor of ~1.7 on the estimated SFR: logSFR=3.89+0.69×logL[OIII].\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -3.89 + 0.69 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OIII]}}. \end{equation}(10)Since [Oiii]88 emission requires highly ionized gas of low density, it is not surprising that the [Oiii]88 emission is weaker in starburst galaxies (with an average [Oiii]88/[Oi]63 line ratio of 0.4 in starburst as compared to 3 in dwarfs), where gas densities are also higher and mean free path lengths are shorter. Although the hard radiation to ionize O+ is likely present in local starbursts, the radiation is produced in compact, dusty regions, prohibiting the high-energy photons to reach the lower density gas surrounding dense cores (e.g., Abel et al. 2009).

5.5.3. Composite/AGN sources

The SFR calibrations are more dispersed for composite and AGN sources compared to starburst galaxies. The substantial scatter might be due to a possible contribution from dust heated by the AGN to the total infrared luminosity (e.g., Sargsyan et al. 2012). Alternatively, some AGNs appear to show line deficits similar to ULIRGs caused by highly charged dust grains that limit the photoelectric heating efficiency (Tielens & Hollenbach 1985a; Malhotra et al. 1997; Negishi et al. 2001; Croxall et al. 2012; Farrah et al. 2013) and/or high dust-to-gas opacities due to an increased average ionization parameter (e.g., Graciá-Carpio et al. 2011; Díaz-Santos et al. 2013; Farrah et al. 2013). Part of the dispersion for the [Oi]63 line might be caused by self-absorption and optical depth effects as well as excitation through shocks11.

The star formation activity in AGNs can be constrained up to a factor of ~2.3 based on all three lines: logSFR=6.09+0.90×logL[CII],logSFR=5.08+0.76×logL[OI]and\begin{align} &\log {\it SFR}~= -6.09 + 0.90 \times \log\, L_{\text{[CII]}}, \\ &\log {\it SFR}~= -5.08 + 0.76 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OI]}}\,\text{and} \\ &\log {\it SFR}~= -5.46 + 0.87 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OIII]}}. \end{align}Several combinations of FIR lines, in particular for [Oiii]88, result in SFR calibrations with reduced scatter. With the [Oiii]88 line being on average ~5 times fainter than [Cii], we believe the results are an artifact of the fitting procedure and do not have any physical interpretation.

5.5.4. Ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs)

Since the ULIRG sample does not cover a sufficient range in luminosity to constrain the slope of the SFR calibration, we fix the slope to a value of 1 (similar to the slope for the entire literature sample) and determine the intercept from the fitting procedure. The SFR calibrations for ULIRGs are offset by about 0.5 to 1.0 dex from starbursts and AGNs due to line deficits relative to their total infrared luminosity, which are caused either by the compactness of the size of starburst regions (e.g., Graciá-Carpio et al. 2011; Díaz-Santos et al. 2013; Farrah et al. 2013) and/or enhanced grain charging in regions with high G0/nH values (Tielens & Hollenbach 1985a; Malhotra et al. 1997; Negishi et al. 2001; Croxall et al. 2012; Farrah et al. 2013). The occurrence of line deficits has been shown to coincide with the transition between two different modes of star formation (Graciá-Carpio et al. 2011), i.e., the star-forming disk galaxies populating the main sequence in the gas-star formation diagrams and ultra-luminous gas-rich mergers with elevated levels of star formation for the same gas fractions (Daddi et al. 2010; Genzel et al. 2010).

With a fixed slope of 1, the SFR can be determined from the [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 luminosities within uncertainty factors of 2, 2.1, and 2.5, respectively, using the calibrations: logSFR=6.28+1.0×logL[CII],logSFR=6.23+1.0×logL[OI]and\begin{align} &\log {\it SFR}~= -6.28 + 1.0 \times \log\, L_{\text{[CII]}}, \\[2mm] &\log {\it SFR}~= -6.23 + 1.0 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OI]}}\,\text{and} \\[2mm] &\log {\it SFR}~= -5.80 + 1.0 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OIII]}}. \end{align}The SFR calibrations derived from our sample of ULIRGs are offset from the SFR calibrations reported by Farrah et al. (2013) in the sense that our SFR estimates are 2 to 4 times higher. Given that our literature sample contains the same ULIRGs presented in Farrah et al. (2013), we believe the difference in the SFR estimate can be attributed to the reference SFR tracer that was used to calibrate the SFR relations. While we rely on the TIR luminosity and the SFR(TIR) calibration presented in Hao et al. (2011), Farrah et al. (2013) use the PAH luminosity and the SFR(PAH) relation presented in Farrah et al. (2007).

5.5.5. High-redshift galaxies

As [Cii] observations in high-redshift galaxies have been more popular than other FIR fine-structure lines, we can report a relatively reliable SFR calibration for the [Cii] line, based on: logSFR=8.52+1.18×logL[CII].\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~ = -8.52 + 1.18 \times \log\, L_{\text{[CII]}}. \end{equation}(17)Most high-redshift sources follow the trend of local starbursts and AGNs but with significant dispersion (0.40 dex), which results in an uncertainty factor on the SFR estimate of about 2.5. The large scatter can be attributed to some high-redshift galaxies, revealing similar [Cii] deficits as ULIRGs. Relying on the warmer temperatures inferred for high-redshift sources (e.g., Magdis et al. 2012), it might not be surprising that [Cii] is incapable of tracing the SFR accurately because of the presence of strong radiation fields.

For the [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 lines, the literature high-redshift sample did not contain a sufficient number of objects to constrain the slope and intercept in our fitting procedure. Therefore, the slope was fixed to a value of 1, which is similar to the slope in the SFR calibrations for the entire literature sample. The SFR calibrations for [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 determined in this way are: logSFR=7.03+1.0×logL[OI]\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -7.03 + 1.0 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OI]}} \end{equation}(18)and logSFR=6.89+1.0×logL[OIII].\begin{equation} \log {\it SFR}~= -6.89 + 1.0 \times \log\, L_{\text{[OIII]}}. \end{equation}(19)The scatter in the SFR relations for [Oi]63 quickly increases with only six high-redshift detections resulting in an uncertainty factor of ~4.4 on the SFR estimate. The [Oi]63 detections from Sturm et al. (2010), Coppin et al. (2012), and Ferkinhoff et al. (2014) suggest that the line emission is significantly brighter at high-redshift compared to the SFR calibration derived in the local Universe, which could imply that the ISM in those early Universe objects is warmer and denser compared to average conditions in the local Universe. The [Oi]63 line might easily become optically thick, however, and could be hampered by other excitation mechanisms (e.g., shocks) in dusty high-redshift galaxies, especially during merger episodes. We furthermore need to caution that the few [Oi]63 detections of high-redshift galaxies might be biased toward hot, dense objects given the difficulty to detect [Oi]63 at high redshift. One exception is the intermediate redshift (z = 0.59) galaxy IRAS F16413+3954 (Dale et al. 2004), which shows a similar [Oi]63 deficit as local ULIRGs. More [Oi]63 detections at high-redshift sources are mandatory to infer the behavior of this line with the star formation activity in early Universe objects.

Based on the high-redshift [Oiii]88 detections and upper limits reported in the literature for five galaxies (Ivison et al. 2010b; Ferkinhoff et al. 2010; Valtchanov et al. 2011), the [Oiii]88 line might be a potentially powerful tracer of the star formation activity in the early Universe in the absence of [Cii] and with a similar degree of uncertainty on the SFR estimate (factor of ~2.6). Since hard radiation is required to ionize O+, it is not surprising that the [Oiii]88 line is bright in high-redshift sources, which are known to harbor strong radiation fields (e.g., Magdis et al. 2012). Aside from the compact star-forming regions, high-redshift sources could have low-density components where the chemistry and heating is regulated by the hard radiation field.

6. Conclusions

Based on Herschel observations of low-metallicity dwarf galaxies from the Dwarf Galaxy Survey, we have analyzed the applicability of FIR fine-structure lines to reliably trace the star formation activity. More specifically, we investigated whether three of the brightest cooling lines in the DGS sample ([Cii], [Oi]63, [Oiii]88) are linked to the star formation rate as probed through a composite SFR tracer (GALEX FUV+MIPS 24 μm). We briefly summarize the results of our analysis:

  • On spatially resolved galaxy scales, the [Oiii]88 line shows the tightest correlation with the SFR (0.25 dex), which provides determination of the SFR with an uncertainty factor of 1.6. Also, [Oi]63 is a reasonably good SFR tracer with an uncertainty factor of 1.7 on the SFR estimate. The spatially resolved relation between [Cii] and the SFR is heavily dispersed and does not allow us to constrain the SFR within a factor of 2.

  • The dispersion in the SFR calibrations results from the diversity in ISM conditions (i.e., density and ionization state of the gas) for the DGS sample covering a wide range in metallicity, rather than from variations within one single galaxy on spatially resolved scales.

  • On global galaxy scales, the dispersion in the SFRL[CII] relation (0.38 dex) is again worse compared to the [Oi]63 (0.25 dex) and [Oiii]88 (0.30 dex) lines. The [Oi]63 line is the most reliable overall SFR indicator in galaxies of subsolar metallicity with an uncertainty factor of 1.8 on the SFR estimate, while the SFR derived from [Oiii]88 is uncertain by a factor of 2. The [Cii] line is not considered a reliable SFR tracer in galaxies of low metal abundance.

  • The scatter in the SFRL[CII] relation increases toward low metallicities, warm dust temperatures, and large filling factors of diffuse, highly ionized gas. Due to the porosity of the ISM and the exposure to hard radiation fields, an increased number of ionizing photons is capable of ionizing gas at large distances from the star-forming regions, which favors line cooling through ionized gas tracers such as [Oiii]88. The photoelectric efficiency might, furthermore, reduce in low-metallicity environments due to grain charging and/or increased photon escape fractions.

  • On spatially resolved scales, we can reduce the scatter in the SFR calibration by combining the emission from multiple FIR lines. Ideally, we want to probe the emission from all cooling lines that constitute the total gas cooling budget.

Based on the assembly of literature data, we furthermore analyze the applicability of fine-structure lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 to probe the SFR (as traced by the TIR luminosity) in Hii/starburst galaxies, AGNs, ULIRGs, and high-redshift objects:

  • The [Cii] and [Oi]63 lines are considered to be the most reliable SFR tracers to recover the star formation activity in starburst galaxies with uncertainty factors of 1.9 and 1.6. The [Oiii] line, on the other hand, is weak and the SFR calibration could not be well constrained because of the low number of Herschel [Oiii]88 detections in starbursts.

  • All three FIR lines can recover the SFR from composite or AGN sources within an uncertainty of factor ~2.3. The increased scatter in the SFR calibrations for AGNs (as compared to starbursts) might result from a possible AGN contribution to the total infrared luminosity (used to derive the SFR). Alternatively, some AGNs might show line deficits similar to ULIRGs.

  • ULIRGs are offset from the SFR calibrations for starbursts and AGNs due to line deficits relative to their total infrared luminosity and, therefore, require separate SFR calibrations. The star formation rate in ULIRGs is preferentially traced through [Cii] and [Oi]63 line emission, providing SFR estimates with uncertainties of factor ~2, while the SFR([Oiii]) estimate is uncertain by a factor of 2.5.

  • At high-redshift, we can only reliably determine an SFR calibration for the [Cii] line (with an uncertainty factor of ~2.5 on the SFR estimate) because of the low number of observations for the other lines. The relatively few detections of [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 appear to be bright at high-redshift, suggesting that the [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 lines are also potentially powerful tracers of the SFR at high redshift, but more detections are mandatory to acquire conclusive evidence.

Online material

Appendix A: Comparison between different SFR tracers for the DGS sample

Appendix A.1: Limitations of SFR tracers in metal-poor dwarf galaxies

In this work, we rely on the most recent calibrations reported in Kennicutt & Evans (2012), which are calibrated for an initial mass function (IMF) characterized by a broken power law with a slope of 2.35 from 1 to 100 M and 1.3 between 0.1 and 1 M (Kroupa & Weidner 2003). Table A.1 gives an overview of the reference SFR calibrations used in this work. The SFR calibrations based on single tracers in the first part of Table A.1 predict the SFR in M yr-1 following the prescription log  SFR = log  Lx − log  Cx, where Lx is the SFR indicator in units of erg s-1 and Cx represents the calibration coefficients for a specific SFR diagnostic. The second part of Table A.1 provides the calibrations to correct unobscured SFR indicators for extinction.

Table A.1

Overview of the different reference SFR calibrations.

The empirically derived SFR calibrations from Table A.1 assume a constant star formation rate over timescales comparable to or longer than the lifetime of stars to which the SFR tracers are sensitive. The age range for the SFR tracers used in this analysis are summarized in the second column of Table A.1 and were adopted from Kennicutt & Evans (2012), with the first, second, and third number representing the lower age boundary, the mean age, and the age of stars below which 90% of the emission is contributed, respectively. For observations covering an entire galaxy, we sample a wide range in age across the different star-forming complexes, sufficient to maintain a constant level of star formation activity when averaging out over different galaxy regions. With low-mass galaxies being dominated by one or only few Hii regions and furthermore characterized by bursty star formation histories (e.g., Mateo 1998; Fioc & Rocca-Volmerange 1999), the assumption of constant star formation rate might not be valid because of the insufficient sampling of different ages. The SFR calibrations might, therefore, no longer hold. In particular, on spatially resolved scales (i.e., few hundreds of parsec or the size of a typical Hii region for nearby DGS sources achieved in Herschel observations), the sampling of different ages will not suffice to sample the entire age range to maintain a constant star formation activity (i.e., constant SFR across the entire age range) and the SFR calibrations might break down. Therefore, we caution the interpretation of the SFR in the analysis of metal-poor dwarf galaxies, in particular for the spatially resolved analysis in Sect. 3, in the sense that the unobscured SFR obtained from GALEX FUV might underestimate the “true” level of star formation activity throughout the galaxy.

Other than the constant SFR, empirical SFR calibrations assume the universality of the initial mass function (IMF). Pflamm-Altenburg et al. (2007) question this universality of the IMF on global galaxy scales, especially in dwarf galaxies, arguing that the maximum stellar mass in a star cluster is limited by the total mass of the cluster with the latter being constrained by the SFR. Neglecting this effect could result in an underestimation of the SFR by up to 3 orders of magnitude. Since the data currently at hand do not allow a proper investigation of any possible deviations from universal IMF, we apply and derive SFR calibrations in this paper under the assumption of universality of the IMF, but keep in mind that possible systematic effects might bias our analysis. The extendibility of SFR calibrations to the early Universe might furthermore be affected by deviations from this universal IMF, with indications for a top heavy IMF at high-redshift (Larson 1998; Baugh et al. 2005; Davé 2008; Lacey et al. 2008; Wilkins et al. 2008).

Appendix A.2: Comparison of unobscured SFR tracers: GALEX FUV and Hα

The FUV and Hα fluxes are commonly-used tracers of the unobscured star formation. The applicability of FUV as a star formation rate tracer might, however, be affected by the recent star formation history in dwarfs, which is often bursty and dominated by few, giant Hii regions (e.g., Mateo 1998; Fioc & Rocca-Volmerange 1999). With Hα being sensitive to the emission of OB stars with mean ages ~107 yr and FUV tracing the emission of massive A stars with ages ~108 yr (Lequeux 1989), Hα might be more appropriate as SFR tracer in dwarf galaxies with a particular bursty star formation history.

In Fig. A.1, we compare the ratio of the SFR as obtained from the SFR calibrators FUV + MIPS 24 μm and Hα + MIPS 24 μm (see SFR relations in Table A.1) as a function of oxygen abundance. Total Hα fluxes are taken from Gil de Paz et al. (2003); Moustakas & Kennicutt (2006); Kennicutt et al. (2008); Östlin et al. (2009). We determine the best fit to the data points based on linear regression fits using the IDL procedure MPFITEXY, which is based on the nonlinear least-squares fitting package MPFIT (Markwardt 2009). The best-fit line and a perfect one-to-one correlation are indicated as dotted red, and dashed black lines. The dispersion around the best fit is indicated in the bottom right corner.

For galaxies with oxygen abundances 12 + log  (O/H) ≥ 8.1, the two composite SFR tracers seem to provide consistent estimates of the SFR, while below 12 + log  (O/H) < 8.1 galaxies start to deviate from a perfect one-to-one correlation. Due to the lower stellar masses of metal-poor dwarfs, their star formation history is dominated by only few giant Hii regions and, thus, heavily dependent on the time delay since the last burst of star formation. With FUV tracing the unobscured star formation over a timescale of 10 to 100 Myr (Kennicutt 1998; Calzetti et al. 2005; Salim et al. 2007), the SFR derived from FUV emission will be lower compared to Hα in galaxies characterized by a single recent burst of star formation (<10 Myr) over a timescale of 100 Myr. Therefore, Hα is considered a better SFR calibrator in low-mass dwarfs, which are dominated by single Hii regions. The correspondence between SFR estimates from FUV and emission for galaxies with 12 + log  (O/H) ≥ 8.1 might indicate an age effect, where the latter objects are rather in a post-starburst phase and the most recent starburst occurred more than 10 Myr ago. The unavailability of Hα maps (only global Hα fluxes could be retrieved from the literature for most galaxies) prevents us from using Hα as reference SFR tracer, since we are unable to recover the Hα emission that corresponds to the areas in galaxies covered by our Herschel observations. Therefore, FUV is used as reference SFR tracer for this analysis, bearing in mind that the conversion to SFR might break down for low-mass metal-poor dwarfs where FUV will on average underestimate the SFR derived from Hα by 50% (see Fig. A.1).

thumbnail Fig. A.1

Comparison between the ratio of the SFR as obtained from the SFR calibrators FUV + MIPS 24 μm and Hα + MIPS 24 μm as a function of oxygen abundance. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The dotted red, and dashed black, lines represent the best fit and a perfect one-to-one correlation, respectively. The dispersion around the best fit is indicated in the bottom right corner.

Appendix A.3: Comparison of obscured SFR tracers: IRAC8 μm, MIPS 24 μm, LTIR, and 1.4 GHz

Different monochromatic and multiband data in the infrared and radio wavelength domain can be used to trace the obscured star formation component. Here, we compare IRAC 8 μm, MIPS 24 μm, PACS 70 μm, the total infrared luminosity, and radio continuum emission at 1.4 GHz. Total IRAC 8 μm flux densities have been adopted from Rémy-Ruyer et al. (in prep.). The DGS sample has been observed by the Herschel PACS (70, 100, 160 μm) and SPIRE (250, 350, 500 μm) photometers in all continuum bands. Details about the observing strategy, the applied data reduction techniques and aperture photometry results are presented in Rémy-Ruyer et al. (2013). Total infrared luminosities LTIR are taken from Madden et al. (2013), as determined from Spitzer bands using the prescriptions in Dale & Helou (2002). Radio continuum measurements are retrieved from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) catalog (Condon et al. 1998), Cannon & Skillman (2004), Thuan et al. (2004), and Hunt et al. (2005).

The emission from PAHs usually dominates the IRAC 8 μm band in metal-rich galaxies. In low-metallicity galaxies, the IRAC 8 μm band might also contain an important contribution from the warm continuum emission from very small grains. Since the PAH emission has been observed to be under-luminous below 12 + log  (O/H) ~ 8.1 (Boselli et al. 2004; Engelbracht et al. 2005; Jackson et el. 2006; Madden et al. 2006; Draine et al. 2007; Engelbracht et al. 2008; Galliano et al. 2008), in combination with the uncertainty to quantifying the 8 μm band in terms of PAH and VSG contribution, the IRAC 8 μm band is considered an unreliable SFR calibrator for the DGS sample covering a wide range in metallicity. Calzetti et al. (2007) could indeed identify that the sensitivity of the IRAC 8 μm band to metallicity is about one order of magnitude worse compared to MIPS 24 μm. The weak PAH emission toward lower metallicities is not directly related to the lower metal abundance but rather emanates from the generally strong and hard radiation fields in low-metallicity systems destroying and/or ionizing PAHs (e.g., Gordon et al. 2008; Sandstrom et al. 2012). Other than its dependence on metallicity (or thus radiation field), PAH emission tends to be inhibited in regions of strong star formation activity while it can be several times more luminous compared to other star formation rate tracers in regions with relatively weak or nonexistent star formation (e.g., Calzetti et al. 2005; Bendo et al. 2008; Gordon et al. 2008). Prior to any conversion of IRAC 8 μm emission to SFR, the band emission needs to be corrected for any stellar contribution. Given that the contribution from the stellar continuum could be substantial in low-abundance galaxies, this will make the correction using standard recipes (e.g., Helou et al. 2004) highly uncertain. All together, we argue that the IRAC 8 μm is not appropriate as SFR indicator in our sample of dwarf galaxies with widely varying metallicities.

The most common monochromatic tracer of obscured star formation is MIPS 24 μm emission, which generally originates from a combination of stochastically heated very small grains (VSGs) and large grains at an equilibrium temperature of ~100 K. For a grain size distribution similar to our Galaxy, we expect large equilibrium grains only to start dominating the MIPS 24 μm emission above a threshold of G0 ~ 100, where G0 is the scaling factor of the interstellar radiation field, expressed relative to the FUV interstellar radiation field from 6 to 13.6 eV for the solar neighborhood in units of Habing flux, i.e., 1.6 × 10-3 erg s-1 m-2. The emission in the MIPS 24 μm band has been shown to be well-correlated with other star formation rate tracers on both local scales (Calzetti et al. 2007; Leroy et al. 2008) and global scales (e.g., Calzetti et al. 2005, 2007; Wu et al. 2005; Alonso-Herrero et al. 2006; Pérez-González et al. 2006; Zhu et al. 2008; Kennicutt et al. 2009; Rieke et al. 2009; Hao et al. 2011) and directly traces the ongoing star formation over a timescale of ~10 Myr (Calzetti et al. 2005; Pérez-González et al. 2006; Calzetti et al. 2007).

Since the grain properties and size distribution has been shown to be sensitive to the metallicity of galaxies (Lisenfeld et al. 2002; Galliano et al. 2003, 2005), we need to verify whether MIPS 24 μm is an appropriate SFR tracer for the DGS sample. In low-metallicity objects, small grain sizes (3 nm) start to dominate the 24 μm emission compared to larger dust grains (Lisenfeld et al. 2002; Galliano et al. 2003, 2005), due to the fragmentation of these larger dust grains through shocks experienced in the turbulent ISM. The hard radiation field in low-metallicity galaxies (see Sect. 4.3) furthermore increases the maximum temperature of stochastically heated grains and shifts the peak of the SED to shorter wavelengths, boosting the MIPS 24 μm flux (e.g., Thuan et al. 1999; Houck et al. 2004; Galametz et al. 2009, 2011). To verify the influence of metallicity on the MIPS 24 μm band emission, we compare the estimated star formation rates obtained from MIPS 24 μm to other SFR indicators, which should not be biased (or at least less) by variations in the dust composition across galaxies with different metal abundances.

thumbnail Fig. A.2

Comparison between the ratio of the SFR as obtained from the SFR calibrators MIPS 24 μm and PACS 70 μm (top), FUV+MIPS 24 μm and FUV+TIR (middle) and FUV+MIPS 24 μm and FUV+1.4 GHz (bottom) as a function of oxygen abundance. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The dotted red and dashed black lines represent the best fit and a perfect one-to-one correlation, respectively. The dispersion around the best fit is indicated in the bottom right corner.

Toward longer wavelengths (70, 100, 160 μm), the band emission is dominated by larger dust grains and should not depend strongly on the abundance of very small grains. For larger dust grains a significant fraction of the dust heating might, however, be attributed to more evolved stellar populations, making the link between FIR continuum emission and star formation more dispersed (Bendo et al. 2010; Calzetti et al. 2010; Boquien et al. 2011; Bendo et al. 2012a; Groves et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2012). In a similar way, the total infrared luminosity might be subject to heating from old stars and, therefore, only linked to star formation on much longer timescales. Some individual studies argue that most of the dust heating is provided by star-forming regions in dwarfs (e.g., Galametz et al. 2010; Bendo et al. 2012a), even at wavelengths longward of 160 μm, suggesting that the longer wavelength data (70, 100, 160 μm) could potentially be reliable star formation rate tracers. More detailed analyses of the dominant heating sources for dust in dwarfs however might be required to conclude on the applicability of FIR continuum bands to trace the SFR. In Fig. A.2, we compare the SFR as estimated from the single continuum bands MIPS 24 μm and PACS 70 μm (see top panel). The best-fit line and dispersion (0.28 dex) in this plot is mainly dominated by three galaxies (SBS 0335-052, Tol 1214-277, Haro 11), which have the peak of their SED at very short wavelengths and, therefore, the 24 μm band will overestimate the SFR while the 70 μm emission will underestimate the SFR. The other galaxies seem to follow the one-to-one correlation better with a dispersion of 0.18 dex around the one-to-one correlation (or difference between the two SFR estimates up to 51%).

In the central panel of Fig. A.2, we make a similar comparison between the composite SFR tracers FUV + 24 μm and FUV+TIR. The best-fit line (with slope α = 0.15) diverges from the one-to-one correlation with the combination of FUV and MIPS 24 μm providing higher SFR than inferred from FUV+TIR. We argue that this discrepancy is mainly caused by the fact that the SFR relations for the total infrared luminosity were calibrated based on galaxy samples of normal star-forming galaxies with close to solar abundances. They might, therefore, be less appropriate for metal-poor dwarfs, which are typically characterized by steeply rising mid-infrared (MIR) to far-infrared (FIR) slopes and overall SEDs peaking at wavelengths lower than ~60 μm (e.g., Thuan et al. 1999; Houck et al. 2004; Galametz et al. 2009, 2011).

Radio continuum emission at 1.4 GHz is dominated by nonthermal synchrotron emission associated with the acceleration of electrons in a galaxy’s magnetic field, and, therefore, independent of the grain composition in a galaxy’s ISM. The emission at 1.4 GHz is often used as a tracer of star formation, since the optically thin radio synchrotron emission correlates well with the FIR emission (i.e., the FIR-radio correlation; e.g., de Jong et al. 1985; Helou et al. 1985). However, the 1.4 GHz is not really a tracer of obscured star formation since it probes the energy from supernovae associated with star-forming regions and, therefore, rather correlates with the total energy output from star-forming regions, including both obscured and unobscured star formation. Figure A.2 (bottom panel) shows the ratio of SFR estimated from FUV + 24μm and FUV + 1.4 GHz as a function of oxygen abundance (or metallicity), with the black dashed line representing the one-to-one correlation. In general, the SFR obtained from the composite tracer FUV+MIPS 24 μm is higher than the SFR estimated from FUV+1.4 GHz. We argue that this deviation can again be attributed to the bursty star formation history in dwarf galaxies. Although the emission at 24 μm and 1.4 GHz is sensitive to stars of ages up to at least 100 Myr (see Table A.1), the MIPS 24 μm band is dominated by the emission of stars younger than 10 Myr. In view of the recent trigger of star formation that characterizes most dwarf galaxies in our sample, the 1.4 GHz emission will typically underestimate the SFR since it was calibrated for models of constant SFR (or supernova rate) over the past 100 Myr. One exception is galaxy HS 0822+3542, for which the SFR seems to be underestimated based on FUV+MIPS 24 μm data. The strange behavior of this galaxy in the PACS wavebands (Rémy-Ruyer et al. 2013) supports the peculiarity of this object. Another outlier is Haro 11, which shows the highest ratio based on the composite tracer FUV+24 μm. We believe that the warmer dust temperatures with a peak in its SED at very short wavelengths (~40 μm, Galametz et al. 2009) in this LIRG causes an overestimation of the SFR based on MIPS 24 μm.

Based on the above comparison between different tracers of obscured star formation, we opted to use the reference SFR tracers FUV and MIPS 24 μm for the analysis of the DGS sample. By estimating the SFR from FUV and MIPS 24 μm emission, we should be tracing the emission of young stars with ages up to 100 Myr. It is possible, however, to get diffuse emission that is not locally heated by star-forming regions in both FUV and MIPS 24 μm bands originating from heating by the diffuse interstellar radiation field. This could potentially cause an overestimation of the SFR in diffuse regions and might bias the interpretation of the observed relations between the SFR and FIR line emission, in particular for the spatially resolved analysis of Sect. 3. With the Dwarf Galaxy Survey often not mapping the nearby galaxies completely in the FIR lines but rather focusing on the brightest star-forming regions, we argue that the contribution from diffuse regions and the heating by evolved stellar populations most likely will be limited in many cases. Although, we should keep in mind the possible contribution of diffuse FUV and 24 μm emission to the SFR estimates upon analyzing the SFR relations. Similarly, the FUV band might contain residual starlight from evolved stellar populations due to the low level of obscuration in some of the dwarfs. The presence of only few evolved stars in dwarfs (compared to more massive early-type galaxies with large spheroids), however, makes it unlikely that residual starlight of old stars will contribute significantly to the FUV emission.

thumbnail Fig. A.3

Comparison between the Herschel and ISO line fluxes, i.e., the ratio of the Herschel and ISO measurements for [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), and [Oiii]88 (bottom) as a function of Herschel line luminosities. The mean and standard deviation of the Herschel-to-ISO flux ratio is indicated in the top left corner of each panel. The best-fit line and a perfect one-to-one correlation are indicated as solid red and dotted black lines, respectively.

Appendix A.4: Comparison ISO-Herschel

Since the literature sample is composed of Herschel and ISO fluxes, we need to verify whether the spectroscopic flux calibration of the Herschel PACS and ISO LWS instruments are compatible. Hereto, we assemble the ISO fluxes from the Brauher et al. (2008) catalog for galaxies in our literature sample with Herschel measurements. We only consider galaxies that are classified as unresolved with respect to the LWS beam in Brauher et al. (2008) to minimize the influence of different beam sizes in our comparison. We gather a sample of 44, 19, and 10 sources with [Cii], [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 fluxes from both Herschel and ISO observations. Those galaxies are indicated with a dagger behind their name in Tables B.3, B.4 and B.5. Figure A.3 presents the Herschel-to-ISO line ratios for [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle) and [Oiii]88 (bottom). Based on the 44 measurements for [Cii], we find that the Herschel fluxes are on average 1.19 ± 0.43 higher compared to the ISO measurements. The best-fit line (see solid red line in Fig. A.3, top panel) lies close to the one-to-one correlation. Overall, the Herschel and ISO [Cii] fluxes are consistent with each other within the error bars, in particular for the higher luminosity sources. Based on the 19 [Oi]63 and ten [Oiii]88 measurements, we infer that the Herschel measurements are on average lower by a factor of 0.86 ± 0.16 and 0.69 ± 0.18, respectively, compared to the ISO fluxes. For the [Oi]63 line, the Herschel PACS and ISO LWS measurements still agree within the error bars, but for the [Oiii]88 line the discrepancy between Herschel and ISO measurements is considered significant. Although the larger ISO LWS beam (~80) could collect more flux compared to the PACS beam for the [Oi]63 and [Oiii]88 lines (FWHM ~ 9.5″), we would expect to see similar behavior for the [Cii] line

(PACS FWHM ~ 11.5″) if the difference in beam size is driving the offset between Herschel and ISO fluxes. The absence of any beam size effects for [Cii] makes us conclude that the discrepancy between Herschel and ISO for [Oiii]88 can likely be attributed to a difference in calibration. Given the significant difference in [Oiii]88 line fluxes, we will only take the [Oiii]88 measurements derived from Herschel observations into account for the SFR calibrations.

Appendix B: Tables

Table B.1

Overview of DGS sources used in the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.2

Overview of literature data for high-redshift galaxies used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.3

Overview of literature data for dwarf galaxies used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.4

Overview of literature data for galaxies with Hii or starburst source classification used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.5

Overview of literature data for galaxies with composite or AGN source classification used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.


1

Oxygen abundances, which are used here to constrain metallicities, are calculated from optical line intensities following the prescriptions in Pilyugin & Thuan (2005), assuming a solar oxygen abundance O/H = 4.9 × 10-4, or 12 + log  (O/H) = 8.7 (Asplund et al. 2009).

2

The DGS galaxies UGCA 20 and Tol 0618-402 were not observed with the PACS spectrometers on board Herschel.

4

The distance of 7.5 Mpc has been chosen as a fair compromise between the number of spatially resolved galaxies to be analyzed and the spatial resolution of about 100 pc, corresponding to the nominal pixel size of 3.1333 at 7.5 Mpc.

5

The SFR calibration in De Looze et al. (2011) was derived based on the reference SFR tracers GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 μm and the scaling factor α = 6.31, as derived by Zhu et al. (2008). Recalibrating their relation with the scaling factor (α = 3.89) applied in this paper would only shift their relation by 0.2 dex at most.

6

Although the [Cii] luminosity range in De Looze et al. (2011) (5.7 ≤ log  L[CII] [ L] 9.1) does not extend to the faintest [Cii] luminosities for galaxies, it largely overlaps with the L[CII] range covered by DGS sources while the SFR relation in Sargsyan et al. (2012) was calibrated for higher [Cii] luminosities (7 ≤ log  L[CII][L] ≤ 9).

7

Other FIR lines have been observed for the GOALS sample, but have not yet been published.

8

We refer to high-redshift galaxies starting from redshifts z ≥ 0.5.

10

Often FIR luminosities (42.5122.5 μm) are reported, while the SFR calibration requires the total infrared luminosity, LTIR (see Table A.1). We use a common conversion factor of 1.75 to translate the quoted FIR into total infrared luminosities, following Calzetti et al. (2000). Some authors apply the convention that LFIR is the luminosity in the wavelength range 40500 μm. We convert the latter FIR luminosities to LTIR using a conversion factor of 1.167, following the factor of 1.75 (Calzetti et al. 2000) to convert from FIR (42.5122.5 μm) to TIR (81000 μm) and the conversion factor L40−500 μm = 1.5 × L42.5−122.5 μm (Sanders et al. 2003).

11

The literature data for AGNs and ULIRGs mostly correspond to total galaxy values, whereas the link between the SFR and [Oi]63 line might be more dispersed zooming in into the central regions of galaxies hosting AGNs.

Acknowledgments

I.D.L. is a postdoctoral researcher of the FWO-Vlaanderen (Belgium). V.L. is supported by a CEA/Marie Curie Eurotalents fellowship. This research was supported by the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) through the programme SYMPATICO (Programme Blanc Projet ANR-11-BS56-0023). PACS has been developed by a consortium of institutes led by MPE (Germany) and including UVIE (Austria); KU Leuven, CSL, IMEC (Belgium); CEA, LAM (France); MPIA (Germany); INAFIFSI/ OAA/OAP/OAT, LENS, SISSA (Italy); IAC (Spain). This development has been supported by the funding agencies BMVIT (Austria), ESA-PRODEX (Belgium), CEA/CNES (France), DLR (Germany), ASI/INAF (Italy), and CICYT/ MCYT (Spain). SPIRE has been developed by a consortium of institutes led by Cardiff University (UK) and including Univ. Lethbridge (Canada); NAOC (China); CEA, LAM (France); IFSI, Univ. Padua (Italy); IAC (Spain); Stockholm Observatory (Sweden); Imperial College London, RAL, UCL-MSSL, UKATC, Univ. Sussex (UK); and Caltech, JPL, NHSC, Univ. Colorado (USA). This development has been supported by national funding agencies: CSA (Canada); NAOC (China); CEA, CNES, CNRS (France); ASI (Italy); MCINN (Spain); SNSB (Sweden); STFC and UKSA (UK); and NASA (USA).

References

  1. Abel, N. P., Dudley, C., Fischer, J., Satyapal, S., & van Hoof, P. A. M. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggarwal, K. M., & Keenan, F. P. 1999, ApJS, 123, 311 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso-Herrero, A., Rieke, G. H., Rieke, M. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 835 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Gordon, K. D., & Sandstrom, K. 2011, PASP, 123, 1218 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Annibali, F., Tosi, M., Monelli, M., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 169 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, AR&A, 47, 481 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baugh, C. M., Lacey, C. G., Frenk, C. S., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1191 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bendo, G. J., Draine, B. T., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 629 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bendo, G. J., Wilson, C. D., Pohlen, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bendo, G. J., Boselli, A., Dariush, A., et al. 2012a, MNRAS, 419, 1833 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bendo, G. J., Galliano, F., & Madden, S. C. 2012b, MNRAS, 423, 197 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boquien, M., Calzetti, D., Combes, F., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 111 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G., Lequeux, J., & Pierini, D. 2002, A&A, 385, 454 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boselli, A., Lequeux, J., & Gavazzi, G. 2004, A&A, 428, 409 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Boselli, A., Boissier, S., Cortese, L., & Gavazzi, G. 2008, ApJ, 674, 742 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brauher, J. R., Dale, D. A., & Helou, G. 2008, ApJS, 178, 280 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Bianchi, L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 871 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 870 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Calzetti, D., Wu, S.-Y., Hong, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1256 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cannon, J. M., & Skillman, E. D. 2004, ApJ, 610, 772 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cannon, J. M., Walter, F., Armus, L., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1170 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Coppin, K. E. K., Danielson, A. L. R., Geach, J. E., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 520 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cormier, D., 2012, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7), France [Google Scholar]
  26. Cormier, D., Madden, S. C., Hony, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L57 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cortese, L., Boissier, S., Boselli, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A101 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cox, P., Krips, M., Neri, R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 63 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Crawford, M. K., Genzel, R., Townes, C. H., & Watson, D. M. 1985, ApJ, 291, 755 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Croxall, K. V., Smith, J. D., Wolfire, M. G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 81 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Daddi, E., Elbaz, D., Walter, F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, L118 [Google Scholar]
  32. Davé, R. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dale, D. A., & Helou, G. 2002, ApJ, 576, 159 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dale, D. A., Helou, G., Brauher, J. R., et al. 2004, ApJ, 604, 565 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. De Breuck, C., Maiolino, R., Caselli, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, L8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  36. de Jong, T., Klein, U., Wielebinski, R., & Wunderlich, E. 1985, A&A, 147, L6 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  37. De Looze, I., Baes, M., Bendo, G. J., Cortese, L., & Fritz, J. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2712 [Google Scholar]
  38. Díaz-Santos, T., Armus, L., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 68 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., Bendo, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 866 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Engelbracht, C. W., Gordon, K. D., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, L29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Engelbracht, C. W., Blaylock, M., Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 994 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, G. H., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 804 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Farrah, D., Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 667, 149 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Farrah, D., Lebouteiller, V., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 38 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ferkinhoff, C., Hailey-Dunsheath, S., Nikola, T., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, L147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ferkinhoff, C., Brisbin, D., Parshley, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 142 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Fioc, M., & Rocca-Volmerange, B. 1999, A&A, 344, 393 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fischer, J., Sturm, E., González-Alfonso, E., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L41 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Franx, M., Illingworth, G. D., Kelson, D. D., van Dokkum, P. G., & Tran, K.-V. 1997, ApJ, 486, L75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Galametz, M., Madden, S., Galliano, F., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 645 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. Galametz, M., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. Galametz, M., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Galliano, F., Madden, S. C., Jones, A. P., et al. 2003, A&A, 407, 159 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  55. Galliano, F., Madden, S. C., Jones, A. P., Wilson, C. D., & Bernard, J.-P. 2005, A&A, 434, 867 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  56. Galliano, F., Dwek, E., & Chanial, P. 2008, ApJ, 672, 214 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Scodeggio, M., Pierini, D., & Belsole, E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 595 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Donati, A., Franzetti, P., & Scodeggio, M. 2003, A&A, 400, 451 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  59. Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Gracia-Carpio, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2091 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Gil de Paz, A., Madore, B. F., & Pevunova, O. 2003, ApJS, 147, 29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Glover, S. C. O., & Clark, P. C. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Goldsmith, P. F., Langer, W. D., Pineda, J. L., & Velusamy, T. 2012, ApJS, 203, 13 [Google Scholar]
  63. Gordon, K. D., Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 336 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Graciá-Carpio, J., Sturm, E., Hailey-Dunsheath, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, L7 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Griffin, M. J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L3 [Google Scholar]
  66. Groves, B., Krause, O., Sandstrom, K., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 892 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hailey-Dunsheath, S., Nikola, T., Stacey, G. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, L162 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Hao, C.-N., Kennicutt, R. C., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 124 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Heiles, C. 1994, ApJ, 436, 720 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Helou, G. 2000, Infrared Space Astronomy, Today and Tomorrow, eds. F. Casali, J. Lequeux, & F. David, Les Houches Summer School, 70, 337 [Google Scholar]
  71. Helou, G., Soifer, B. T., & Rowan-Robinson, M. 1985, ApJ, 298, L7 [Google Scholar]
  72. Helou, G., Roussel, H., Appleton, P., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 253 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  73. Herrera-Camus, R., Fisher, D. B., Bolatto, A. D., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hodge, P., Smith, T., Eskridge, P., MacGillivray, H., & Beard, S. 1991, ApJ, 379, 621 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hollenbach, D., & McKee, C. F. 1989, ApJ, 342, 306 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Houck, J. R., Charmandaris, V., Brandl, B. R., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 211 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  77. Hunt, L. K., Dyer, K. K., & Thuan, T. X. 2005, A&A, 436, 837 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  78. Hunter, D. A., Kaufman, M., Hollenbach, D. J., et al. 2001, ApJ, 553, 121 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  79. Hwang, H. S., Geller, M. J., Diaferio, A., & Rines, K. J. 2012, ApJ, 752, 64 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. Iono, D., Yun, M. S., Elvis, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, L97 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. Israel, F. P., & Maloney, P. R. 2011, A&A, 531, A19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  82. Israel, F. P., Maloney, P. R., Geis, N., et al. 1996, ApJ, 465, 738 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., Papadopoulos, P. P., et al. 2010a, MNRAS, 404, 198 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  84. Ivison, R. J., Swinbank, A. M., Swinyard, B., et al. 2010b, A&A, 518, L35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  85. Jackson, D. C., Cannon, J. M., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 192 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. Jones, A. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 740 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D. J., & Luhman, M. L. 1999, ApJ, 527, 795 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., & Hollenbach, D. J. 2006, ApJ, 644, 283 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189 [Google Scholar]
  90. Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Armus, L., Bendo, G., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 928 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  92. Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Lee, J. C., Funes, S. J., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 247 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Hao, C.-N., Calzetti, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1672 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kraemer, K., Jackson, J. M., & Lane, A. P. 1996, BAAS, 28, 1302 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kroupa, P., & Weidner, C. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1076 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  96. Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., Frenk, C. S., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  97. Larson, R. B. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 569 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  98. Lebouteiller, V., Kunth, D., Lequeux, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 415, 55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  99. Lebouteiller, V., Cormier, D., Madden, S. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A91 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  100. Lee, J. C., Hwang, H. S., & Ko, J. 2013, ApJ, 774, 62 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lequeux, J. 1989, Evolution of Galaxies: Astronomical Observations (Berlin, New York: Springer Verlag), 333, 147 [Google Scholar]
  102. Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2782 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  103. Li, Y., Crocker, A. F., Calzetti, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 180 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  104. Lisenfeld, U., Israel, F. P., Stil, J. M., & Sievers, A. 2002, A&A, 382, 860 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  105. Luhman, M. L., Satyapal, S., Fischer, J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 504, L11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  106. Luhman, M. L., Satyapal, S., Fischer, J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 594, 758 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  107. Madden, S. C. 2000, New Astron. Rev., 44, 249 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  108. Madden, S. C., Poglitsch, A., Geis, N., Stacey, G. J., & Townes, C. H. 1997, ApJ, 483, 200 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  109. Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., Jones, A. P., & Sauvage, M. 2006, A&A, 446, 877 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  110. Madden, S. C., Rémy-Ruyer, A., Galametz, M., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 600 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  111. Magdis, G. E., Daddi, E., Béthermin, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  112. Maiolino, R., Cox, P., Caselli, P., et al. 2005, A&A, 440, L51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  113. Maiolino, R., Caselli, P., Nagao, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 500, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  114. Malhotra, S., Helou, G., Stacey, G., et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  115. Malhotra, S., Kaufman, M. J., Hollenbach, D., et al. 2001, ApJ, 561, 766 [Google Scholar]
  116. Markwardt, C. B. 2009, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, ASP Conf. Ser., 411, 251 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  117. Marsden, G., Borys, C., Chapman, S. C., Halpern, M., & Scott, D. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 43 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  118. Mateo, M. L. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 435 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  119. McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 565 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  120. Moshir, M., et al. 1990, IRAS Faint Source Catalogue, version 2.0 (1990), 0 [Google Scholar]
  121. Moustakas, J., & Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 2006, ApJS, 164, 81 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  122. Murphy, E. J., Condon, J. J., Schinnerer, E., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  123. Negishi, T., Onaka, T., Chan, K.-W., & Roellig, T. L. 2001, A&A, 375, 566 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  124. Östlin, G., Hayes, M., Kunth, D., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 923 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  125. Ouchi, M., Ellis, R., Ono, Y., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, 102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  126. Parkin, T. J., Wilson, C. D., Schirm, M. R. P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  127. Péquignot, D. 2008, A&A, 478, 371 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  128. Pérez-González, P. G., Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 987 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  129. Pflamm-Altenburg, J., Weidner, C., & Kroupa, P. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1550 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  130. Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  131. Pilyugin, L. S., & Thuan, T. X. 2005, ApJ, 631, 231 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  132. Planck Collaboration XVI. 2014, A&A, in press DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 [Google Scholar]
  133. Poglitsch, A., Krabbe, A., Madden, S. C., et al. 1995, ApJ, 454, 293 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  134. Poglitsch, A., Herrmann, F., Genzel, R., et al. 1996, ApJ, 462, L43 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  135. Poglitsch, A., Waelkens, C., Geis, N., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  136. Rawle, T. D., Egami, E., Bussmann, R. S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 59 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rémy-Ruyer, A., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A95 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  138. Rémy-Ruyer, A., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  139. Riechers, D. A., Walter, F., Carilli, C. L., & Lewis, G. F. 2009, ApJ, 690, 463 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  140. Riechers, D. A., Bradford, C. M., Clements, D. L., et al. 2013, Nature, 496, 329 [Google Scholar]
  141. Rieke, G. H., Alonso-Herrero, A., Weiner, B. J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 556 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  142. Röllig, M., Ossenkopf, V., Jeyakumar, S., Stutzki, J., & Sternberg, A. 2006, A&A, 451, 917 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  143. Roy, J.-R., & Kunth, D. 1995, A&A, 294, 432 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  144. Sanders, D. B., & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  145. Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J. A., & Soifer, B. T. 2003, AJ, 126, 1607 [Google Scholar]
  146. Salim, S., Rich, R. M., Charlot, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 267 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  147. Sandstrom, K. M., Bolatto, A. D., Bot, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 20 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  148. Sargsyan, L., Lebouteiller, V., Weedman, D., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 171 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  149. Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  150. Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  151. Schurer, A., Calura, F., Silva, L., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 2001 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  152. Silk, J., & Werner, M. W. 1969, ApJ, 158, 185 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  153. Smith, M. W. L., Eales, S. A., Gomez, H. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 40 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  154. Stacey, G. J., Geis, N., Genzel, R., et al. 1991, ApJ, 373, 423 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  155. Stacey, G. J., Hailey-Dunsheath, S., Ferkinhoff, C., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 957 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  156. Stierwalt, S., Armus, L., Surace, J. A., et al. 2013, ApJS, 206, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  157. Sturm, E., Verma, A., Graciá-Carpio, J., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L36 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  158. Swinbank, A. M., Karim, A., Smail, I., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1066 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  159. Thuan, T. X., Sauvage, M., & Madden, S. 1999, ApJ, 516, 783 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  160. Thuan, T. X., Hibbard, J. E., & Lévrier, F. 2004, AJ, 128, 617 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  161. Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. 1985a, ApJ, 291, 722 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  162. Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. 1985b, ApJ, 291, 747 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  163. Tosi, M., Aloisi, A., Mack, J., & Maio, M. 2007, Proc. IAU Symp., 235, 65 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  164. Tully, R. B. 1988, Nearby galaxies catalog (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
  165. Valtchanov, I., Virdee, J., Ivison, R. J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3473 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  166. Verma, A., Charmandaris, V., Klaas, U., Lutz, D., & Haas, M. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 119, 355 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  167. Wagg, J., Carilli, C. L., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  168. Wagg, J., Wiklind, T., Carilli, C. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, L30 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  169. Wilkins, S. M., Hopkins, A. M., Trentham, N., & Tojeiro, R. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 363 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  170. Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D., McKee, C. F., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Bakes, E. L. O. 1995, ApJ, 443, 152 [Google Scholar]
  171. Wright, E. L. 2006, PASP, 118, 1711 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  172. Wu, H., Cao, C., Hao, C.-N., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, L79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  173. Zhao, Y., Lu, N., Xu, C. K., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765, L13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  174. Zhu, Y.-N., Wu, H., Cao, C., & Li, H.-N. 2008, ApJ, 686, 155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Excitation conditions of the fine-structure lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88, with Col. 2 providing the ionization potential (IP) to create the species.

Table 2

Overview of the calibration coefficients for SFR calibrations based on the spatially resolved (top) and global galaxy (bottom) DGS sample.

Table 3

Prescriptions to estimate the SFR from the relation log SFR [M yr-1] = β + α × log Lline [ L] depending on galaxy type, i.e., metal-poor dwarf galaxies, Hii/starburst galaxies, composite, or AGN sources, ULIRGs, and high-redshift galaxies.

Table A.1

Overview of the different reference SFR calibrations.

Table B.1

Overview of DGS sources used in the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.2

Overview of literature data for high-redshift galaxies used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.3

Overview of literature data for dwarf galaxies used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.4

Overview of literature data for galaxies with Hii or starburst source classification used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

Table B.5

Overview of literature data for galaxies with composite or AGN source classification used for the SFR calibrations presented in this paper.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Ratio of the unobscured (LFUV) versus obscured star formation (3.89*L24), as a function of oxygen abundance, 12 +log  (O/H), for the DGS sample. The multiplicative factor of 3.89 in the denominator arises from the calibration coefficient that corrects the observed FUV emission for extinction following Hao et al. (2011) (i.e., LFUV(corr) = LFUV (obs) + 3.89 × L24). Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. Data points correspond to global galaxy fluxes.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between surface densities of the SFR and [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), and [Oiii]88 (bottom) surface densities. The legend explains the symbols used for different galaxies with the color bar indicating the oxygen abundance. Representative error bars are indicated in the lower left corner. Uncertainties on the SFR include the errors on each of the SFR calibrators (GALEX FUV, MIPS 24 μm) as well as the average scatter in the calibrations used to convert to the SFR (see Table A.1). Uncertainties on the FIR line surface densities incorporate the errors due to line fitting as well as calibration uncertainties (taken conservatively as ~ 30%). The best fitting SFR calibration is presented as a solid, black line. The dispersion of data points around the SFR calibration is indicated at the top of each panel, with the number in parentheses indicating the scatter for the complete sample with >5σ detections for all three lines.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between surface densities of the SFR and a combination of [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88 surface densities. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 2.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] (top) and [Oi]63 (bottom) as a function of FIR color, i.e., PACS 100 μm/PACS 160 μm. The legend explains the symbols used for different galaxies with the color bar indicating the oxygen abundance. Representative error bars are indicated in the lower left corner. Uncertainties on the SFR include the errors on each of the SFR calibrators (GALEX FUV, MIPS 24 μm) as well as the average scatter in the reference calibration (see Table A.1). Uncertainties on the PACS line ratios incorporate the errors due to map-making as well as calibration uncertainties (5%). The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients are presented in the top right corner. In parentheses, we show the dispersion for the complete galaxy sample, i.e., galaxy regions that have >5σ detections for all three lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Spatially resolved galaxy relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] as a function of [Oi]63/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (top) and [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (bottom) line ratios. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 4.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Relation between the SFR and [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), and [Oiii]88 (bottom) luminosities on global galaxy scales. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The best-fit SFR calibration is presented as a solid, black line. The dispersion of data points around the SFR calibration is indicated at the top of each panel, with the number in parentheses indicating the scatter for the complete sample with >5σ detections for all three lines.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), [Oiii]88 (bottom) as a function of oxygen abundance, 12 +log  (O/H), on global galaxy scales. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients are indicated in the top right corner. In parentheses, we show the dispersion for the complete galaxy sample, i.e., global galaxies that have >5σ detections for all three lines [Cii], [Oi]63, and [Oiii]88.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] (top), and [Oi]63 (bottom) as a function of dust temperature, Tdust, on global galaxy scales. The galaxy I Zw 18 was not detected at PACS 160 μm wavelengths and, therefore, the fitting procedure was not attempted in Rémy-Ruyer et al. (2013). Herrera-Camus et al. (2012) estimated a lower limit for the dust temperature Td ≥ 33.7 K based on the PACS 70 μm flux and PACS 160 μm upper limit, which is used to indicate the position of I Zw 18 in the plots of Fig. 4. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 7.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Relation between the dispersion from the SFR calibrations for [Cii] as a function of [Oi]/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (top) and [Oiii]88/[Cii] + [Oi]63 (bottom) line ratios, on global galaxy scales. The image format is the same as explained in Fig. 7.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

Left: SFR calibrations based on a literature sample of different galaxy populations for FIR fine-structure lines ([Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), [Oiii]88 (bottom). DGS dwarf galaxies, Hii/starburst galaxies and composite, LINER or AGN sources are presented as red diamonds, blue asterisks, and purple triangles, respectively. ULIRGs with LFIR> 1012 L are indicated as orange crosses. High-redshift sources can be identified as green squares while upper limits for high-redshift objects are shown as black arrows. The solid black line shows the best-fit relation for the entire galaxy sample, while the dashed red, cyan, purple, orange, and green curves represent the SFR calibrations derived for separate galaxy populations, i.e., dwarf galaxies, starbursts, AGNs, ULIRGs, and high-redshift sources, respectively. The 1σ dispersion of the entire galaxy sample around the best fit is indicated in the bottom right corner of each panel. Right: dispersion plots indicating the logarithmic distance between the SFR estimates obtained from the reference SFR tracer and the FIR line emission. The 1σ dispersion of the entire literature sample is indicated as dashed black lines. The top panel also includes previous SFR calibrations reported in De Looze et al. (2011) (dotted red line) and Sargsyan et al. (2012) (dash-dotted blue line).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.1

Comparison between the ratio of the SFR as obtained from the SFR calibrators FUV + MIPS 24 μm and Hα + MIPS 24 μm as a function of oxygen abundance. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The dotted red, and dashed black, lines represent the best fit and a perfect one-to-one correlation, respectively. The dispersion around the best fit is indicated in the bottom right corner.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.2

Comparison between the ratio of the SFR as obtained from the SFR calibrators MIPS 24 μm and PACS 70 μm (top), FUV+MIPS 24 μm and FUV+TIR (middle) and FUV+MIPS 24 μm and FUV+1.4 GHz (bottom) as a function of oxygen abundance. Galaxies are color-coded according to metallicity with increasing oxygen abundances ranging from black then blue, green and yellow to red colors. The dotted red and dashed black lines represent the best fit and a perfect one-to-one correlation, respectively. The dispersion around the best fit is indicated in the bottom right corner.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.3

Comparison between the Herschel and ISO line fluxes, i.e., the ratio of the Herschel and ISO measurements for [Cii] (top), [Oi]63 (middle), and [Oiii]88 (bottom) as a function of Herschel line luminosities. The mean and standard deviation of the Herschel-to-ISO flux ratio is indicated in the top left corner of each panel. The best-fit line and a perfect one-to-one correlation are indicated as solid red and dotted black lines, respectively.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.