Informed total-error-minimizing priors: Interpretable cosmological parameter constraints despite complex nuisance effects

¹ University Observatory, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Scheinerstraße 1, 81679 Munich, Germany
² Department of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
³ Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
⁴ SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
⁵ Excellence Cluster ORIGINS, Boltzmannstraße 2, 85748 Garching, Germany

^⋆ Corresponding author; bried@stanford.edu

Received: 1 May 2024
Accepted: 5 December 2024

Abstract

While Bayesian inference techniques are standard in cosmological analyses, it is common to interpret resulting parameter constraints with a frequentist intuition. This intuition can fail, for example, when marginalizing high-dimensional parameter spaces onto subsets of parameters, because of what has come to be known as projection effects or prior volume effects. We present the method of informed total-error-minimizing (ITEM) priors to address this problem. An ITEM prior is a prior distribution on a set of nuisance parameters, such as those describing astrophysical or calibration systematics, intended to enforce the validity of a frequentist interpretation of the posterior constraints derived for a set of target parameters (e.g., cosmological parameters). Our method works as follows. For a set of plausible nuisance realizations, we generate target parameter posteriors using several different candidate priors for the nuisance parameters. We reject candidate priors that do not accomplish the minimum requirements of bias (of point estimates) and coverage (of confidence regions among a set of noisy realizations of the data) for the target parameters on one or more of the plausible nuisance realizations. Of the priors that survive this cut, we select the ITEM prior as the one that minimizes the total error of the marginalized posteriors of the target parameters. As a proof of concept, we applied our method to the density split statistics measured in Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data. We demonstrate that the ITEM priors substantially reduce prior volume effects that otherwise arise and that they allow for sharpened yet robust constraints on the parameters of interest.