Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935623]


Issue
A&A
Volume 640, August 2020
Article Number C6
Number of page(s) 6
Section Planets and planetary systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935623e
Published online 27 August 2020

The original article has two errors which are corrected below and which do not have any impact on the conclusions.

  • 1.

    In Fig. 7 of the original article, the labels inside the plot are inverted. The corrected figure is shown in Fig. 1.

  • 2.

    There was an error in the constant value used for the conversion between the standard deviation (σ) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) when fitting the exoplanet atmospheric absorption with a Gaussian profile. As a result, all of the FWHM values shown in the original article change by a constant value. The affected tables and figures from the main text are those containing FWHM information, that is to say, Tables 4, 5, and Fig. 13. In the appendix, this affects Table B.1 and all corner plots from Appendix D (Figs. D.1–D.7). The corrected tables and figures are presented below in the same order as in the original article.


© ESO 2020

All Tables

Table 1

Best fit parameters and 1-σ error bars from the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis of the Hα line for each individual night and combined HARPS-N observations.

Table 2

Summary of the results obtained in the analysis is presented here for the different species and instruments.

Table 3

Best fit parameters and 1-σ error bars from the MCMC analysis.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Transmission spectra around Hα line obtained with all nights of HARPS-N combined and CARMENES data (Night 4), with an offsetfor a better visualisation. The best-fit Gaussian profiles are shown in red. In grey, we show the original transmission spectrum and the black dots show the data binned in 0.2 Å intervals.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Top: FWHM values vs. Rλ(h). Bottom: vwind values vs. Rλ(h). The measurements obtained with HARPS-N data are shown with dots, while those obtained with CARMENES data are marked with stars. The horizontal blue dashed line shows the mean vwind value at − 2.4 ± 1.0 km s−1. All values were extracted from Table 2.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Correlation diagrams of MCMC analysis of the Hα line of CARMENES (left) and HARPS-N data analysis (right).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Correlation diagrams of MCMC analysis of the Hβ (left) and Hγ (right) lines obtained with the HARPS-N data analysis.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Correlation diagrams of MCMC analysis of the Ca II triplet lines of CARMENES. The Ca II λ8498 Å diagram is shown in the top left panel, Ca II λ8542 Å is in the top right panel, and λ8662 Å is in the bottom panel.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Correlation diagrams of MCMC analysis of the Na I D2 line of CARMENES (left) and HARPS-N data analysis (right).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Correlation diagrams of MCMC analysis of the Na I D1 line of CARMENES (left) and HARPS-N data analysis (right).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Correlation diagrams of MCMC analysis of the Fe II triplet lines. The Fe II λ5018 Å diagram is shown in the top left and Fe II λ5169 Å is in the top right, both of which result from the HARPS-N combined data analysis. The Fe II λ5316 Å diagrams are shown in the bottom panels: the HARPS-N analysis is on the left and the CARMENES analysis is on the right.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Correlation diagrams of MCMC analysis of the Mg I line at 5173 Å.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.