Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935623]


Table 3

Best fit parameters and 1-σ error bars from the MCMC analysis.

h FWHM Kp vwind Rλ (*) Rλ (h) (§)
[%] [km s−1] [km s−1] [km s−1] [Rp] [Rp]
Hβ HARPS-N 1
               
HARPS-N 2
               
HARPS-N 3
               
HARPS-Nx3

Hγ HARPS-N 1
               
HARPS-N 2
               
HARPS-N 3
               
HARPS-Nx3

NaI D2 HARPS-N 1
               
HARPS-N 2
               
HARPS-N 3
               
HARPS-Nx3
               
CARMENES 1

NaI D1 HARPS-N 1
               
HARPS-N 2
               
HARPS-N 3
               
HARPS-Nx3
               
CARMENES 1

CaII λ8498 Å CARMENES 1
               
CaII λ8542 Å CARMENES 1
               
CaII λ8662 Å CARMENES 1

FeII λ5018 Å HARPS-Nx3
               
FeII λ5169 Å HARPS-Nx3
               
FeII λ5316 Å HARPS-Nx3
               
CARMENES 1

MgI λ5173 Å HARPS-Nx3

Notes. (*) Effective radius value obtained from the best fit model of the CLV and RME effects. (§) Effective radius was calculated considering the absorption value, h, from the best-fit model and assuming a continuum level of .

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.