Issue |
A&A
Volume 564, April 2014
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A68 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
Section | Interstellar and circumstellar matter | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322912 | |
Published online | 08 April 2014 |
High abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O toward photon-dominated regions in the Orion-A giant molecular cloud⋆
1
Laboratoire AIM,
CEA/DSM-CNRS-Universitlté Paris Diderot, IRFU/Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay,
91191
Gif-sur-Yvette,
France
e-mail:
Yoshito.Shimajiri@cea.fr
2
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka,
181-8588
Tokyo,
Japan
3
Nobeyama Radio Observatory, 462-2 Nobeyama, Minamimaki, Minamisaku, 384-1305
Nagano,
Japan
4
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science,
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,
3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, 252-5210
Sagamihara,
Japan
5
Joint ALMA Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107 Vitacura, 763 0355
Santiago,
Chile
6
Institute of Astrophysics and Planetary Sciences, Ibaraki
University, 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Mito,
310-8512
Ibaraki,
Japan
7
Department of Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Tokyo Gakugei
University, Koganei,
184-8501
Tokyo,
Japan
8
The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo, 113-0033
Tokyo,
Japan
9
Department of Physical Science, Osaka Prefecture
University, Gakuen 1-1, Sakai,
599-8531
Osaka,
Japan
Received:
25
October
2013
Accepted:
24
February
2014
Aims. We derive physical properties such as the optical depths and the column densities of 13CO and C18O to investigate the relationship between the far ultraviolet (FUV) radiation and the abundance ratios between 13CO and C18O.
Methods. We have carried out wide-field (0.4 deg2) observations with an angular resolution of 25.8″ (~0.05 pc) in 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) toward the Orion-A giant molecular cloud using the Nobeyama 45 m telescope in the on-the-fly mode.
Results. Overall distributions and velocity structures of the 13CO and C18O emissions are similar to those of the 12CO (J = 1–0) emission. The optical depths of the 13CO and C18O emission lines are estimated to be 0.05 < τ13CO < 1.54 and 0.01 <τC18O< 0.18, respectively. The column densities of the 13CO and C18O emission lines are estimated to be 0.2 × 1016< N13CO < 3.7 × 1017 cm-2 and 0.4 × 1015<NC18O< 3.5 × 1016 cm-2, respectively. The abundance ratios between 13CO and C18O, X13CO/XC18O, are found to be 5.7−33.0. The mean value of X13CO/XC18O in the nearly edge-on photon-dominated regions is found to be 16.47 ± 0.10, which is a third larger than that the solar system value of 5.5. The mean value of X13CO/XC18O in the other regions is found to be 12.29 ± 0.02. The difference of the abundance ratio is most likely due to the selective FUV photodissociation of C18O.
Key words: ISM: abundances / ISM: clouds / photon-dominated region / ISM: individual objects: Orion-A
The data and the FITS files of Figs. 1, 2a,b, and 3a are only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/564/A68
© ESO, 2014
1. Introduction
Far ultraviolet (FUV: 6 eV < hν < 13.6
eV) radiation emitted from massive stars influences the structure, chemistry, thermal
balance, and evolution of the neutral interstellar medium of galaxies (Hollenbach & Tielens 1997). Furthermore, stars are formed in the
interstellar medium (ISM) irradiated by the FUV radiation. Hence, studies of the influence
of FUV are crucial for understanding the process of star formation. Regions where FUV
photons dominate the energy balance or chemistry of the gas are called photon-dominated
regions (PDRs). The FUV emission selectively dissociates CO isotopes more effectively than
CO because of the difference in the self shielding (Glassgold et al. 1985; Yurimoto & Kuramoto
2004; Liszt 2007; Röllig & Ossenkopf 2013). The FUV intensity at the wavelengths of
the dissociation lines for abundant CO decays rapidly on the surface of molecular clouds
since the FUV emission becomes optically very thick at these wavelengths. For less abundant
C18O, which has
shifted absorption lines owing to the difference in the vibrational-rotational energy
levels, the decay of FUV is much lower. As a result, C18O molecules are expected to be
selectively dissociated by UV photons, even in a deep molecular cloud interior. In the dark
cloud near a young cluster (IC 5146, for example), the ratio of the 13CO to C18O fractional abundance,
/XC18O,
considerably exceeds the solar system value of 5.5 at visual extinction (AV) values of less than 10
mag (Fig. 19 in Lada et al. 1994). This trend
indicates the selective UV photodissociation of C18O. A variation of the abundance ratios of the isotopes is
also reported (Wilson 1999; Wang et al. 2009). For example, the values of
/XC18O
in the solar system, local ISM, Galactic center, and Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) are
measured to be 5.5, 6.1, 12.5, and 40.8. In the Milky way, the isotopic ratio is
proportional to the distance from our Galactic center (Wilson 1999).
The Orion-A giant molecular cloud (Orion-A GMC) is the nearest GMC (d = 400 pc; Menten et al. 2007; Sandstrom et al. 2007; Hirota et al. 2008) and is one of the best studied star-forming regions (e.g., Bally et al. 1987; Dutrey et al. 1993; Tatematsu et al. 1999; Johnstone & Bally 1999; Shimajiri et al. 2008, 2009; Takahashi et al. 2008; Davis et al. 2009; Berné et al. 2010; Takahashi et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2013). In the northern part of the Orion-A GMC, there are three HII regions, M 42, M 43, and NGC 1977 (Goudis 1982). From the comparison of the AzTEC 1.1 mm and the Nobeyama 45 m 12CO (J = 1–0), and Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX) 8 μm emissions (from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PAHs) maps, Shimajiri et al. (2011) have identified seven PDRs and their candidates in the northern part of the Orion-A GMC: 1) Orion Bar; 2) the M 43 Shell; 3) a dark lane south filament (DLSF); 4–7) the four regions A-D. Since the stratification among these distributions can be recognized, the PDR candidates are likely to be influenced by the FUV emission from the Trapezium star cluster and from NU Ori in nearly edge-on configuration. Thus, the Orion-A GMC is one of the most suitable targets for investigating the PDRs. Recently, Shimajiri et al. (2013) carried out wide-field (0.17 deg2) and high-angular resolution (21.3″ ~ 0.04 pc) observations in [CI] line toward the Orion-A GMC. The mapping region includes the nearly edge-on PDRs and the four PDR candidates of the Orion Bar, DLSF, M 43 Shell, and Region D. The overall distribution of the [CI] emission coincides with that of the 12CO emission in the nearly edge-on PDRs, which is inconsistent with the prediction by the plane-parallel PDR model (Hollenbach & Tielens 1999). The [CI] distribution in the Orion-A GMC is found to be more similar to those of the 13CO (J = 1–0), C18O (J = 1–0), and H13CO+ (J = 1–0) lines rather than that of the 12CO (J = 1–0) line in the inner part of the cloud, suggesting that the [CI] emission is not limited to the cloud surface, but is tracing the dense, inner parts of the cloud.
Parameters of our observations.
![]() |
Fig. 1 Peak intensity map in the 12CO (J = 1–0) line in units of K (TMB). The data are from Shimajiri et al. (2011) and Nakamura et al. (2012). A dashed box shows the 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) observing region. The 12CO data in FITS format are available at the NRO web page via http://www.nro.nao.ac.jp/~nro45mrt/html/results/data.html and at the CDS. |
This paper is organized as follows: in Sect. 2, the Nobeyama 45 m observations are described. In Sect. 3, we present the 13CO and C18O maps of the Orion-A GMC and estimate the optical depths of the 13CO and C18O gas and the column densities of these molecules. In Sect. 4, we discuss the variation of the ratio of the 13CO to C18O fractional abundance in terms of the FUV radiation. In Sect. 5, we summarize our results. Detailed distributions of the filaments and dense cores and their velocity structure and mass will be reported in a forthcoming paper.
2. NRO 45 m observations and data reduction
![]() |
Fig. 2 Total intensity maps of the a) 13CO (J = 1–0); and b) C18O (J = 1–0) emission lines integrated over the velocity range 4.25 <VLSR< 14.25 km s-1 in units of K km s-1 (TMB). The other panels are the mean velocity maps of c) 13CO and d) C18O in units of km s-1, and the velocity dispersion maps of e) 13CO; and f) C18O in units of km s-1 calculated for the same velocity range for the total intensity maps. The 13CO and C18O data in FITS format are available at the NRO web page via http://www.nro.nao.ac.jp/~nro45mrt/html/results/data.html and at the CDS. |
![]() |
Fig. 3 Velocity channel maps of the a) 13CO (J = 1–0); and b) C18O (J = 1–0) emission line in units of K km s-1 (TMB dV). The velocity range used for the integration is indicated in the top-left corner of each panel. |
In 2010 and 2013, we carried out 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) mapping observations
toward a 0.4 deg2
region in the northern part of the Orion-A GMC with the 25-element focal plane receiver
BEARS installed in the 45 m telescope at the Nobeyama Radio Observatory (NRO). The
13CO
(J = 1–0) and
C18O
(J = 1–0)
data were obtained separately. Figure 1 shows the
13CO and
C18O observing
areas. At 110 GHz, the telescope has a beam size of 16″ (HPBW) and a main beam efficiency,
ηMB, of 38% in the 2010 season and 36% in
2013, which are from observatory measurements at 110 GHz using the S100 receiver. The beam
separation of the BEARS is 41.̋1 on the sky plane (Sunada et
al. 2000). As the back end, we used 25 sets of 1024 channel auto-correlators (ACs)
which have a 32 MHz bandwidth and a frequency resolution of 37.8 kHz (Sorai et al. 2000). The frequency resolution corresponds to a velocity
resolution of ~0.1
km s-1 at 110 GHz.
During the observations, the system noise temperatures were in a range from 270 K to 470 K
in the double sideband (DSB). The standard chopper wheel method was used to convert the
observed signal to the antenna temperature, , in units of K,
corrected for the atmospheric attenuation. The data are given in terms of the main-beam
brightness temperature,
. The telescope
pointing was checked every 1.5 h by observing the SiO maser source Ori KL, and was better
than 3″ throughout the entire
observation. The intensity scales of the BEARS 25 beams are different from each other owing
to the varying sideband ratios of the beams since the BEARS receiver is operated in DSB
mode. To calibrate the different intensity scales, we used calibration data obtained from
the observations toward W3 and Orion IRC 2 using another SIS receiver, S100, with a single
sideband (SSB) filter and acousto-optical spectrometers (AOSs). The intensity scales between
the S100 receiver and the BEARS 25 beams were estimated to be 1.96–3.96 for 13CO and 1.57–2.77 for
C18O.
Our mapping observations were made with the on-the-fly (OTF) mapping technique (Sawada et al. 2008). We used an emission-free area ~2° away from the mapping area as the off positions. We obtained OTF maps with two different scanning directions along the RA or Dec axes covering the 20′× 20′ or the 20′ × 10′ regions, and combined them into a single map to reduce the scanning effects as much as possible. We adopted a spheroidal function1 (Sawada et al. 2008) to calculate the intensity at each grid point of the final cube data with a spatial grid size of 10″, resulting in the final effective resolution of 25.̋8. The 1σ noise level of the final data is 0.5 K for 13CO and 0.14 K for C18O in TMB at a velocity resolution of 0.8 km s-1. By combining scans along the RA and Dec directions, we minimized the so-called scanning effect using the Emerson & Graeve (1988) PLAIT algorithm. We summarize the parameters for the 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) line observations in Table 1.
3. Results
3.1. Distributions of the 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) emission lines
Figures 2a and b show the total intensity maps of
the 13CO
(J = 1–0)
and C18O
(J = 1–0)
emission lines, respectively, integrated over a velocity range 4.25 < VLSR < 14.25
km s-1 in the
northern part of the Orion-A GMC. The overall distributions of the 13CO and C18O emission lines are found to
be similar to that of the 12CO (J = 1–0) emission line by (Shimajiri et al. 2011). In the 13CO map, the brightest position
is at (RA, Dec) = (5h35m130,
−5°26′48.̋24), which is located on the western side of the Orion bar and is
close to the peak position of the [CI] emission (Shimajiri
et al. 2013). On the other hand, the peak position in the C18O map is at (RA, Dec) =
(5h35m15
7,
−5°22′00.̋24) and is different from the brightest position in the
13CO map. The
elongated structure along the north-south direction is a part of the integral-shaped
filament observed in the dust-continuum emissions at 850 μm (Johnstone & Bally 1999), 1.2 mm (Davis et al. 2009), and 1.3 mm (Chini et al.
1997) as well as in molecular lines such as 13CO (J = 1–0), C18O (J = 1–0), CS
(J = 1–0)
(Tatematsu et al. 1993), and H13CO+ (J = 1–0) (Ikeda et al. 2007). We note that the size of our
mapping area centered at the filament is ~40′ in
the east-west direction, wider than those of the previous observations in the
13CO and
C18O
(J = 1–0)
lines by (Tatematsu et al. 1993). There is a branch
of the 13CO and
C18O emissions
extending toward the southeast of Ori-KL. This structure, called a dark lane south
filament, corresponds to one of the PDRs (Rodríguez-Franco
et al. 2001; Shimajiri et al. 2011).
Moreover, a bending filamentary structure with a length of ~3 pc, is seen to the southwest of Ori-KL
(also see Fig. 5). These features are also found in
our previous observations in the 1.1 mm dust continuum and 12CO (J = 1–0) emissions (Shimajiri et al. 2011). Hereafter, following Shimajiri et al. (2011), we call these structures the
DLSF and the bending structure.
3.2. Velocity structures of the 13CO and C18O emission lines
Figures 3a and b show the 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) velocity channel maps over the range 3.6 < VLSR < 13.2 km s-1. In the maps for 4.4 < VLSR < 9.2 km s-1, the 13CO and C18O emission lines are distributed in the southern part of the mapping area. On the other hand, in the maps for 10.0 < VLSR < 13.2 km s-1, the emission lines are seen in the northern part. These results found the large-scale velocity gradient (~1 km s-1 pc-1), which has been seen in the previous studies in the 12CO, 13CO, H13CO+, and CS lines (Bally et al. 1987; Tatematsu et al. 1993; Ikeda et al. 2007; Shimajiri et al. 2011; Buckle et al. 2012). The velocity gradient from south to north is also seen in the mean velocity maps2 of the 13CO and C18O emission lines shown in Figs. 2c and d, respectively. In the maps for 10.8 < VLSR < 13.2 km s-1, the 13CO emission line shows a shell-like structure with a size of about two pc toward the south of Ori-KL. Its velocity structure does not follow the large-scale velocity gradient from south to north. The shell can also be recognized in the 12CO map (see Fig. 5 in Shimajiri et al. 2011). The overall velocity structures of 13CO and C18O are consistent with those of 12CO (Shimajiri et al. 2011). However, in one of the 13CO channel maps at VLSR = 10.0−10.8 km s-1, a shell-like feature centered at (RA, Dec) = (5h34m47s, −5°32′24″) can be recognized, and this feature is not obvious in the 12CO and C18O maps.
Comparison of velocity dispersion between Orion-A GMC and L1551.
Figures 2e and f show the velocity dispersion maps3 of the 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) emission lines calculated over the velocity range 5.2 < VLSR < 14.0 km s-1. The mean values of the 13CO and C18O velocity dispersions in the observed area are 0.67 ± 0.34 km s-1 (min: 0.30 km s-1, max: 3.6 km s-1) and 0.53 ± 0.21 km s-1 (min: 0.30 km s-1, max: 2.8 km s-1), respectively. In Table 2, we compare the velocity dispersions in the Orion-A GMC and a low-mass star-forming region, L 1551 (Yoshida et al. 2010). The velocity dispersions in the Orion-A GMC are three to four times larger than those in L 1551. Both the 13CO and C18O velocity dispersion maps show that the velocity dispersion becomes the largest in the OMC 1 region. In addition, the velocity dispersion in the integral-shaped filament is relatively high compared with that in the outer region of the filament. The 12CO velocity dispersion increases toward the east of the OMC-2/3 filament (see Fig. 7 in Shimajiri et al. 2011). However, these increments in the 13CO and C18O velocity dispersions are not recognized in our maps.
![]() |
Fig. 4 Maps of the optical depths of the a) 13CO (J = 1–0) and b) C18O (J = 1–0) emission lines, and maps of the column densities of c) 13CO and d) C18O molecules. The optical depths and column densities are estimated on the assumption that the excitation temperatures of the 13CO and C18O (J = 1–0) lines are equal to the peak temperatures of the 12CO (J = 1–0) emission in TMB and are calculated for pixels with intensities above the 8σ noise levels. |
Column densities of the 13CO and C18O gas.
3.3. Column densities of the 13CO and C18O gas and the abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O
![]() |
Fig. 5 a) Map of the abundance ratio |
Abundance ratio /XC18O in the six distinct
regions.
Previous studies in the Orion-A GMC revealed that the mean density values,
,
of the filaments traced in 13CO and the dense cores traced in C18O are ~2 × 103 cm-3 and ~5 × 103 cm-3, respectively, assuming a cylinder and sphere (Nagahama et al. 1998; Ikeda & Kitamura 2009). These values are comparable to the critical
densities of the 13CO and C18O (J = 1–0) lines, validating the local thermodynamic
equilibrium (LTE) assumption. We estimated the column densities of 13CO and C18O on the assumption that the
rotational levels of the 13CO and C18O gas are in the LTE. The optical depths and column
densities of these molecules, τX and NX where X = 13CO and
C18O, can be
derived using the equations (e.g., Kawamura et al.
1998)
and
(4)where
Tex is the excitation temperature of these
molecules in K, and J [T] = 1/(exp[5.29/T] – 1) for 13CO and J [T] = 1/
(exp[5.27/T] – 1) for C18O. The beam filling factors of
and
φC18O for 13CO and C18O, respectively, are assumed to
be 1.0 (also see Sect. 4.2.1). Here, Eqs. (2) and (4) assume that the line profile can be approximated by a Gaussian function. The
peak brightness temperature, TMB, and the FWHM line widths,
ΔV
(13CO) and
ΔV
(C18O) are in
units of K and km s-1, respectively. We derived TMB and
ΔV by
fitting a Gaussian to the observed spectrum at each pixel. We considered the peak
brightness temperature of 12CO (J = 1–0), TCO peak, at
each position (Fig. 1) as the Tex values of
13CO and
C18O, assuming
that the 12CO
emission is optically thick and that the 12CO lines are not self-absorbed by cold foreground gas.
The range of TCO peak is from 12.7 K to 108.0 K and
the mean value is 35.0 K.
For the pixels having signal-to-noise ratios greater than 8, we derived the optical
depths and the column densities as shown in Fig. 4.
The optical depths of the 13CO and C18O lines are estimated to be 0.05 << 1.54 and 0.01
<τC18O< 0.18, respectively
(see Figs. 4a and b). The C18O emission is optically thin
for most of the observed region. Although the column density of the Orion-A GMC is high,
molecules in the J = 1–0 transition lines become optically thin owing
to the high temperature of >20 K. In the northern and southern parts of
the mapping area where the temperature is relatively low, the optical depths are
relatively thick. In contrast, in the central part where the temperature is large, the
optical depth becomes small. The column densities of the 13CO and C18O gas are estimated to be 0.2
× 1016 < N13CO < 3.7 × 1017
and 0.4 × 1015<NC18O < 3.5 × 1016
cm-2,
respectively. The column density around Ori-KL is high owing to the high temperature
(above 100 K) in spite of the small optical depth. In contrast, the column density in the
northern and southern parts is relatively low owing to the low temperature (below 50 K) in
spite of the relatively large optical depth. We summarize these values in Table 3.
Because the fractional abundances of 13CO (X13CO = N13CO/NH2)
and C18O
(XC18O = NC18O/NH2)
are proportional to their column densities, their abundance ratio can be derived as
/XC18O = N13CO/NC18O. Based on the observed
column densities, we found that the abundance ratio varies in the range of 5.7
< X13CO/XC18O <
33.0 within the observed area. The
/XC18O
distribution in Fig. 5a clearly shows that the ratio
becomes higher in the nearly edge-on PDRs and the outskirts of the cloud. In the OMC-1,
OMC-2/3, bending structure, and OMC-4 regions, the mean abundance ratio is 12.29 ± 0.02 (see also Fig. 5b). On the other hand, in the nearly edge-on PDRs of the
Orion-Bar, and the DLSF, and the outskirts of the cloud, the abundance ratio exceeds 15.
The abundance ratio in each region is summarized in Table 4.
4. Discussion
4.1. Selective FUV photodissociation of C18O
The significant difference between the abundance ratios of
/XC18O
in the PDRs and the other regions are clearly demonstrated in the correlation diagrams
between the column densities of 13CO and C18O in Fig. 6. In
OMC-1, OMC-2/3, OMC-4, and bending structure, the mean values of
/XC18O
are 12.14 ± 0.04, 12.92
± 0.04, 11.64
± 0.05, and 11.68
± 0.04, respectively. On the
other hand, in the PDR regions of the Orion bar and DLSF, the mean values of
/XC18O
are 16.58 ± 0.04 and 15.83
± 0.14, respectively. The
/XC18O
values of ~16 is a factor of
three larger than the value of 5.5 in the solar system (Wilson & Matteucci 1992). It should represent the chemical difference
between the PDRs and the other regions. The chemical difference between the PDR and the
other regions is likely to be caused by the different FUV intensities around the regions.
Since the FUV intensities around the PDR regions are considerably higher than those around
the other regions, the selective UV photodissociation of C18O (Yurimoto & Kuramoto 2004; Lada
et al. 1994) efficiently occurs over the entire PDR region. Thus, the
/XC18O
value should be higher in the PDRs.
The interstellar UV radiation probably also causes the selective UV photodissociation of
C18O in the
outskirts of the cloud. Figures 7d–g show that the
/XC18O
ratios at low column densities are as high as the ratios in the PDRs, while the ratios
decrease with increasing column densities. The theoretical study predicts that the
/XC18O
ratio reaches values between f5 and 10 in regions with AV = 1–3 (Warin et al. 1996). The
/XC18O
values at low column densities in the OMC-1, OMC-2/3, OMC-4, and bending structure regions
are, however, higher than the predicted values of 5 to 10. The reason might be that these
regions are influenced by the FUV radiation from OB stars embedded in the Orion-A GMC such
as the NGC 1977, M 43, and Trapezium cluster (θ1 Ori C), as well as the interstellar
UV radiation. In OMC-1, which is the closest region to the Trapezium cluster
(θ1 Ori C), the
/XC18O
ratios are higher than those at the same NC18O column density in
OMC-2/3, OMC-4, and bending structure, although the ratios decrease with increasing column
densities.
In addition, the /XC18O
ratio remains high even at larger AV values than the
theoretically predicted values of 1 to 3 mag (Warin et al.
1996). We can estimate the AV value from the
column density NC18O by using the
following relation derived in the Taurus region by Frerking et al. (1982):
(5)Thus,
the value of NC18O = 4.0 × 1014
cm-2, which is
the lowest value of the C18O column density in the observed area, corresponds to the
value of AV = 4.5 mag. We note
that this value of AV should be the
lower limit, because the C18O molecules are likely to be selectively dissociated by
the FUV radiation. We conclude that the FUV radiation penetrates the innermost part of the
cloud and the whole of our observed region is chemically influenced by the FUV radiation
from the OB stars embedded in the Orion-A GMC.
![]() |
Fig. 6
|
![]() |
Fig. 7 NC18O vs.
|
The chemical fractionation of 13C+ + 12CO →13CO + 12C+ (Δ E = 35 K) is considered to occur at the cloud surface (Langer et al. 1984). The selective photodissociation of C18O is, however, thought to be more dominant than the chemical fractionation, because the temperature of the low column density areas (NC18O < 5 × 1015 cm-2) of the Orion-A GMC is high (Tex = 28.4 ± 9.7 K).
4.2. Influence of the uncertainties in the beam filling factor and the excitation temperature on our derived abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O
4.2.1. Influence of the beam filling factor
In Sect. 3.3, we derived the optical depths and
column densities of 13CO and C18O by using Eqs. (1)–(4) assuming that
the emitting region fills the beam, i.e., the beam filling factors,
and φC18O, are 1.0. Here, we
investigate the influence of the beam filling factor on the derived physical properties.
According to Nummelin et al. (1998) and Kim et al. (2006), we can estimate the beam filling
factor by the equation (6)where
θsource and θbeam are the
source and beam sizes, respectively. The effective beam size of the 13CO and C18O data is 25.8″, which corresponds to 0.05 pc at the
distance of the Orion-A GMC. The sizes of the structures traced by the 13CO and C18O emission lines in the
Orion-A GMC can be estimated from previous observations. The C18O emission is thought to
trace the dense cores, clumps, and/or filaments. On the other hand, the 13CO emission is likely to
trace more extended components than the C18O emission as seen in the integrated intensity maps
(Figs. 2a and b). Previous observations toward the
Orion-A GMC in H13CO+ (1–0) using the Nobeyama 45 m telescope identified
236 dense cores with the clumpfind algorithm (Ikeda et
al. 2007). They estimated the size corrected for the antenna-beam size on the
assumption of a Gaussian intensity profile and revealed that the typical size of dense
cores traced in H13CO+ is 0.14 pc. The sizes of the dense cores traced in
C18O are
expected to exceed 0.14 pc, since the critical density of H13CO+ is higher than that of
C18O. As a
reference, previous observations toward the Taurus cloud, which is one of the nearest
low-mass star forming regions (d = 140 pc, Elias
1978), revealed that the typical size of the dense cores traced in
C18O is 0.1 pc
(Onishi et al. 1996). Furthermore, the Herschel
observations in the 70 μm, 160 μm, 250 μm, 350 μm, and 500
μm
emissions revealed the omnipresence of parsec-scale filaments in molecular clouds and
found that the filaments have very narrow widths: a typical FWHM value of 0.1 pc (Arzoumanian et al. 2011; Palmeirim et al. 2013). From the above, the sizes of the dense cores,
clumps, and/or filaments traced in 13CO and C18O are expected to exceed 0.1 pc. In the case of our
observations, the beam filling factor is expected to exceed 0.8 on the assumption that
θsource > 0.1
pc and θbeam = 0.05 pc. In Tables 3 and 4, we
summarize the optical depths, the column densities, and the abundance ratios of
13CO to
C18O. The
X13CO/XC18O
values on the assumption of φ13CO = 1.0 and
φC18O = 0.8 decrease
compared with those of φ13CO = φC18O = 1.0.
Nevertheless, the X13CO/XC18O
values in the nearly edge-on PDRs of Orion Bar and DLSF are (2.3–2.4) times larger than
the solar system value. Furthermore, the X13CO/XC18O
values even in the OMC-1, OMC-2/3, OMC-4, and bending structure are also (1.7–1.9) times
larger than the solar system value. Even after taking into consideration of
uncertainties in the beam filling factors of 13CO and C18O, we safely conclude that the abundance ratio of
13CO to
C18O is
significantly high toward the nearly edge-on PDRs in the Orion-A GMC.
4.2.2. Influence of the excitation temperature
To estimate the optical depths and the column densities, we considered the 12CO (J = 1–0) peak temperature in TMB as the excitation temperatures of 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0). There is, however, a possibility that the 13CO and C18O lines trace colder areas than the 12CO line, because the 13CO and C18O lines are optically thinner than the 12CO line and probably trace the inner parts of the cloud. Castets et al. (1990) found that the 13CO and C18O line emissions trace the regions with a temperature of 20–30 K and <20 K, respectively, from the observations toward the Orion-A GMC in the 13CO (2–1, 1–0) and C18O (2–1, 1–0) line emissions with low angular resolutions of 100″–140′′. Therefore, in order to investigate the influence of the uncertainties in excitation temperature on the derived physical properties, we also derived the physical properties on the assumption of Tex 13CO = 30 K and Tex C18O = 20 K. These values are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.
The optical depths obtained with the assumption of Tex 13CO = 30
K and Tex C18O = 20 K are
similar to those for Tex = T12CO peak.
In contrast, the column densities derived on the assumption of Tex = T12CO peak
are overestimated by a factor of 1.5–3.0. The X13CO/XC18O
values are, however, estimated to be a factor of 1.2–1.9 larger than the values obtained
with the assumption of Tex =
.
Thus, the X13CO/XC18O
values in the Orion-A GMC are (2.5–5.0) times larger than the solar system value, even
after taking into consideration the uncertainties in the 13CO and C18O (J = 1–0) excitation
temperatures.
4.2.3. Robustness of the high abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O
![]() |
Fig. 8 Map of the integrated intensity ratio of 13CO to C18O. |
Finally, we demonstrate that the high abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O is most likely to be a
direct consequence of the high intensity ratio of 13CO to C18O in the Orion-A GMC. Figure
8 shows the distribution of the integrated
intensity ratio of 13CO (J = 1–0) to C18O (J = 1–0), R13,18 = I13CO/IC18O. The mean
R13,18 value within
the observed area is found to be 11.4 ± 3.2 (min: 4.9, max:32.3). The R13,18 values in the
six distinct regions are summarized in Table 5.
The R13,18 values in
the nearly edge-on PDRs of the Orion Bar and DLSF seem larger than those in the other
regions. The observed intensity ratio, R13,18, is related
with the six parameters of ,
φC18O, Tex 13CO,
Tex C18O,
,
and X13CO/XC18O
(=A13,18) as follows:
(7)Figure
9 shows contour maps of R13,18 in the
τ13CO − X13CO/XC18O plane for the minimum
and maximum values of the coefficient of
/φC18O × J(Tex 13CO)/J(Tex C18O)
in Eq. (7). The R13,18 value increases
with the increasing abundance ratio, if τ13CO < ~ 1.
To explain the mean R13,18 value of
11.4 within the observed area, the lower limits of the abundance ratio, X13CO/XC18O,
are 11.5 for the maximum case in the left panel and 5.8 for the minimum case in the
right panel. Furthermore, the lower limits of the X13CO/XC18O
values in the nearly edge-on PDRs of the Orion Bar and DLSF are 17.1 and 14.6 for the
maximum case and 14.6 and 7.3 for the minimum case. In addition, the lower limits of the
X13CO/XC18O
values in the OMC-1, OMC-2/3, OMC-4, and bending structure are 12.6, 11.8, 11.5, and
10.1 for the maximum case and 6.3, 5.9, 5.8, and 5.4 for the minimum case. In spite of
the uncertainties in our adopted parameters in Eq. (7), we conclude that the the lower limits of X13CO/XC18O
values in the nearly edge-on PDRs tend to be larger than those in the other regions and
the X13CO/XC18O
values within the observed area are (1.3–3.1) times larger than the solar system value
of 5.5. .5.
Integrated intensity ratio of 13CO to C18O.
![]() |
Fig. 9 Contour maps of the integrated intensity ratio of 13CO to C18O in the parameter
plane of the optical depth of 13CO and the abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O. In the left
panel, φ13CO = 1.0,
φC18O = 1.0,
Tex 13CO = 30.0
K, and Tex C18CO = 30.0 K
are assumed. In the right panel, φ13CO = 1.0,
φC18O = 0.8,
Tex 13CO = 30.0
K, and Tex C18CO = 20.0 K
are assumed. The yellow dashed lines indicate
|
5. Conclusions
We have carried out wide-field (0.4 deg2) observations with an angular resolution of 25.8″ (~0.05 pc) in the 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) emission lines toward the Orion-A GMC. The main results are summarized as follows:
-
1.
The overall distributions and velocity structures of the 13CO and C18O emission lines are similar to those of the 12CO (J = 1–0) emission line. The 13CO velocity channel maps show a new shell-like structure, which is not obvious in the 12CO and C18O maps.
-
2.
We estimated the optical depths and column densities of the 13CO and C18O emission lines. The optical depths of 13CO and C18O are estimated to be 0.05 <
< 1.54 and 0.01 <τC18O< 0.18, respectively. The column densities of the 13CO and C18O gas are estimated to be 0.2 × 1016<N13CO < 3.7 × 1017 and 0.4 × 1015 < NC18O< 3.5 × 1016 cm-2, respectively.
-
3.
The abundance ratio between 13CO and C18O,
/XC18O, is found to be 5.7−33.0. The mean value of
/XC18O of the the nearly edge-on PDRs such as the Orion Bar and DLSF are 16.5, which is a factor of three larger than the solar system value of 5.5. On the other hand, the mean value of
/XC18O in the other regions is 12.3. The difference between the abundance ratios in nearly edge-on PDRs and the other regions are likely due to the different intensities of the FUV radiation that cause the selective photodissociation of C18O.
-
4.
In the low column density regions (NC18O < 5 × 1015 cm-2), we found that the abundance ratio exceeds 10. These regions are thought to be influenced by the FUV radiation from the OB stars embedded in the Orion-A GMC such as the NGC 1977, M 43, and Trapezium cluster as well as the interstellar UV radiation.
-
5.
To examine the influence of the beam filling factor in our observations on the abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O, we estimated the beam filling factors for the 13CO and C18O gas to exceed 0.8. After taking into consideration the uncertainties in the beam filling factor, we also found the high abundance ratio
/XC18O over the Orion-A cloud, particularly toward the nearly edge-on PDRs.
-
6.
Even if we consider the lower excitation temperatures of Tex 13CO = 30 K and Tex C18O = 20 K, we come to the same conclusion that the abundance ratio
/XC18O becomes high toward the nearly edge-on PDRs.
-
7.
We checked the robustness of our conclusions in the Orion-A GMC by varying
, φC18O, Tex 13CO, Tex C18O,
, and
/XC18O. To explain the mean value of 11.4 for the intensity ratio R13,18 in our observed region, the lower limit of the
/XC18O value should be (5.8–11.5) times larger than the solar system value of 5.5. In addition, the
/XC18O values in the nearly edge-on PDRs are most likely larger than those in the other regions.
-
8.
When studying the range of possible values of the beam filling factors and of the excitation temperatures, the conclusion remains valid that the
/XC18O values are higher than solar throughout Orion A, and larger in the PDRs than in the diffuse medium.
Schwab (1984) is a convolution kernel and Sawada et al. (2008) described the details of the spheroidal function. We applied the parameters m = 6 and α = 1, which define the shape of the function.
The mean velocity maps are produced by using the task MOMENT in MIRIAD and are
calculated using the equation . We
made them from the 13CO and C18O velocity channel maps with a velocity resolution of
0.3 km s-1 with a
clip equal to twice the respective map rms noise level. The 1σ noise levels of the
13CO and
C18O velocity
channel maps are 0.7 K and 0.2 K in units of TMB.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the anonymous referee for providing helpful suggestions to improve this paper. The 45-m radio telescope is operated by Nobeyama Radio Observatory, a branch of National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 90610551. Part of this work was supported by the ANR-11-BS56-010 project “STARFICH”.
References
- Arzoumanian, D., André, P., Didelon, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L6 [Google Scholar]
- Bally, J., Langer, W. D., Stark, A. A., & Wilson, R. W. 1987, ApJ, 312, L45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Berné, O., Marcelino, N., & Cernicharo, J. 2010, Nature, 466, 947 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buckle, J. V., Davis, C. J., Francesco, J. D., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 521 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Castets, A., Duvert, G., Dutrey, A., et al. 1990, A&A, 234, 469 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Chini, R., Reipurth, B., Ward-Thompson, D., et al. 1997, ApJ, 474, L135 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Davis, C. J., Froebrich, D., Stanke, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 153 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Dutrey, A., Duvert, G., Castets, A., et al. 1993, A&A, 270, 468 [Google Scholar]
- Elias, J. H. 1978, ApJ, 224, 857 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Emerson, D. T., & Graeve, R. 1988, A&A, 190, 353 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Frerking, M. A., Langer, W. D., & Wilson, R. W. 1982, ApJ, 262, 590 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Glassgold, A. E., Huggins, P. J., & Langer, W. D. 1985, ApJ, 290, 615 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Goudis, C. 1982, The Orion complex: A case study of interstellar matter (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co), Astrophys. Space Sci. Lib., 90 [Google Scholar]
- Hirota, T., Ando, K., Bushimata, T., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, 961 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 179 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1999, Rev. Modern Phys., 71, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda, N., & Kitamura, Y. 2009, ApJ, 705, L95 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda, N., Sunada, K., & Kitamura, Y. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1194 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Johnstone, D., & Bally, J. 1999, ApJ, 510, L49 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kawamura, A., Onishi, T., Yonekura, Y., et al. 1998, ApJS, 117, 387 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.-J., Kim, H.-D., Lee, Y., et al. 2006, ApJS, 162, 161 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lada, C. J., Lada, E. A., Clemens, D. P., & Bally, J. 1994, ApJ, 429, 694 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Langer, W. D., Graedel, T. E., Frerking, M. A., & Armentrout, P. B. 1984, ApJ, 277, 581 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K., Looney, L. W., Schnee, S., & Li, Z.-Y. 2013, ApJ, 772, 100 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Liszt, H. S. 2007, A&A, 476, 291 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Forbrich, J., & Brunthaler, A. 2007, A&A, 474, 515 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Nagahama, T., Mizuno, A., Ogawa, H., & Fukui, Y. 1998, AJ, 116, 336 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura, F., Miura, T., Kitamura, Y., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nummelin, A., Dickens, J. E., Bergman, P., et al. 1998, A&A, 337, 275 [NASA ADS] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onishi, T., Mizuno, A., Kawamura, A., Ogawa, H., & Fukui, Y. 1996, ApJ, 465, 815 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Palmeirim, P., André, P., Kirk, J., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A38 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-Franco, A., Wilson, T. L., Martín-Pintado, J., & Fuente, A. 2001, ApJ, 559, 985 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Röllig, M., & Ossenkopf, V. 2013, A&A, 550, A56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Sandstrom, K. M., Peek, J. E. G., Bower, G. C., Bolatto, A. D., & Plambeck, R. L. 2007, ApJ, 667, 1161 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sawada, T., Ikeda, N., Sunada, K., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, 445 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Schwab, F. R. 1984, in Indirect Imaging. Measurement and Processing for Indirect Imaging, ed. J. A. Roberts (Cambridge University Press), 333 [Google Scholar]
- Shimajiri, Y., Takahashi, S., Takakuwa, S., Saito, M., & Kawabe, R. 2008, ApJ, 683, 255 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Shimajiri, Y., Takahashi, S., Takakuwa, S., Saito, M., & Kawabe, R. 2009, PASJ, 61, 1055 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Shimajiri, Y., Kawabe, R., Takakuwa, S., et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, 105 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Shimajiri, Y., Sakai, T., Tsukagoshi, T., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, L20 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sorai, K., Sunada, K., Okumura, S. K., et al. 2000, in Radio Telescopes, ed. H. R. Butcher, SPIE, Conf. Ser., 4015, 86 [Google Scholar]
- Sunada, K., Yamaguchi, C., Nakai, N., et al. 2000, in Radio Telescopes, ed. H. R. Butcher, SPIE Conf. Ser., 4015, 237 [Google Scholar]
- Tatematsu, K., Umemoto, T., Kameya, O., et al. 1993, ApJ, 404, 643 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tatematsu, K., Jaffe, D. T., Plume, R., Evans, II, N. J., & Keene, J. 1999, ApJ, 526, 295 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi, S., Saito, M., Ohashi, N., et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 344 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi, S., Ho, P. T. P., Teixeira, P. S., Zapata, L. A., & Su, Y.-N. 2013, ApJ, 763, 57 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, M., Chin, Y.-N., Henkel, C., Whiteoak, J. B., & Cunningham, M. 2009, ApJ, 690, 580 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Warin, S., Benayoun, J. J., & Viala, Y. P. 1996, A&A, 308, 535 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, T. L. 1999, Rep. Prog. Phys., 62, 143 [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, T. L., & Matteucci, F. 1992, A&ARv, 4, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida, A., Kitamura, Y., Shimajiri, Y., & Kawabe, R. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1019 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yurimoto, H., & Kuramoto, K. 2004, Science, 305, 1763 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
All Tables
All Figures
![]() |
Fig. 1 Peak intensity map in the 12CO (J = 1–0) line in units of K (TMB). The data are from Shimajiri et al. (2011) and Nakamura et al. (2012). A dashed box shows the 13CO (J = 1–0) and C18O (J = 1–0) observing region. The 12CO data in FITS format are available at the NRO web page via http://www.nro.nao.ac.jp/~nro45mrt/html/results/data.html and at the CDS. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 2 Total intensity maps of the a) 13CO (J = 1–0); and b) C18O (J = 1–0) emission lines integrated over the velocity range 4.25 <VLSR< 14.25 km s-1 in units of K km s-1 (TMB). The other panels are the mean velocity maps of c) 13CO and d) C18O in units of km s-1, and the velocity dispersion maps of e) 13CO; and f) C18O in units of km s-1 calculated for the same velocity range for the total intensity maps. The 13CO and C18O data in FITS format are available at the NRO web page via http://www.nro.nao.ac.jp/~nro45mrt/html/results/data.html and at the CDS. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 3 Velocity channel maps of the a) 13CO (J = 1–0); and b) C18O (J = 1–0) emission line in units of K km s-1 (TMB dV). The velocity range used for the integration is indicated in the top-left corner of each panel. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 4 Maps of the optical depths of the a) 13CO (J = 1–0) and b) C18O (J = 1–0) emission lines, and maps of the column densities of c) 13CO and d) C18O molecules. The optical depths and column densities are estimated on the assumption that the excitation temperatures of the 13CO and C18O (J = 1–0) lines are equal to the peak temperatures of the 12CO (J = 1–0) emission in TMB and are calculated for pixels with intensities above the 8σ noise levels. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 5 a) Map of the abundance ratio |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 6
|
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 7 NC18O vs.
|
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 8 Map of the integrated intensity ratio of 13CO to C18O. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 9 Contour maps of the integrated intensity ratio of 13CO to C18O in the parameter
plane of the optical depth of 13CO and the abundance ratio of 13CO to C18O. In the left
panel, φ13CO = 1.0,
φC18O = 1.0,
Tex 13CO = 30.0
K, and Tex C18CO = 30.0 K
are assumed. In the right panel, φ13CO = 1.0,
φC18O = 0.8,
Tex 13CO = 30.0
K, and Tex C18CO = 20.0 K
are assumed. The yellow dashed lines indicate
|
In the text |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.