Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 653, September 2021
Article Number A138
Number of page(s) 22
Section Numerical methods and codes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039618
Published online 24 September 2021
  1. Adam, R., Ade, P. A., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, L4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avenhaus, H., Quanz, S. P., Schmid, H. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 87 [Google Scholar]
  4. Avenhaus, H., Quanz, S. P., Garufi, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benisty, M., Juhasz, A., Boccaletti, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berdeu, A., Soulez, F., Denis, L., Langlois, M., & Thiébaut, É. 2020, A&A, 635, A90 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beuzit, J.-L., Vigan, A., Mouillet, D., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Biraud, Y. 1969, A&A, 1, 124 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  9. Birdi, J., Repetti, A., & Wiaux, Y. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4442 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Birdi, J., Repetti, A., & Wiaux, Y. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3509 [Google Scholar]
  11. Boccaletti, A., Sezestre, E., Lagrange, A. M., et al. 2018, A&A, 614, A52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Borde, P. J., & Traub, W. A. 2006, ApJ, 638, 488 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carrillo, R. E., McEwen, J. D., & Wiaux, Y. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1223 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. Charbonnier, P., Blanc-Féraud, L., Aubert, G., & Barlaud, M. 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 6, 298 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chierchia, G., Pustelnik, N., Pesquet-Popescu, B., & Pesquet, J.-C. 2014, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 23, 5531 [Google Scholar]
  16. Claudi, R. U., Turatto, M., Gratton, R. G., et al. 2008, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 7014, 70143E [Google Scholar]
  17. Combettes, P., & Pesquet, J. C. 2011, Fixed-point algorithms for inverse problems in science and engineering, (Springer) 185 [Google Scholar]
  18. Combettes, P. L., & Wajs, V. R. 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul., 4, 1168 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Boer, J., Salter, G., Benisty, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Boer, J., Langlois, M., van Holstein, R. G., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A63 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Deledalle, C.-A., Vaiter, S., Fadili, J., & Peyré, G. 2014, SIIMS, 7, 2448 [Google Scholar]
  22. Denneulin, L. 2020, PhD Thesis, Lyon, France [Google Scholar]
  23. Denneulin, L., Langlois, M., Pustelnik, N., & Thiébaut, E. 2019, in GRETSI LILLE 2019 [Google Scholar]
  24. Denneulin, L., Pustelnik, N., Langlois, M., Loris, I., & Thiébaut, E. 2020, iTwist, Nantes, France, Dec. 2–4, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dipierro, G., Price, D., Laibe, G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, L73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dohlen, K., Langlois, M., Saisse, M., et al. 2008, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 7014, 70143L [Google Scholar]
  27. Eldar, Y. C. 2008, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 57, 471 [Google Scholar]
  28. Esposito, T. M., Kalas, P., Fitzgerald, M. P., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 24 [Google Scholar]
  29. Flasseur, O., Denis, L., Thiébaut, É., Olivier, T., & Fournier, C. 2019, in 2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (IEEE), 1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Garufi,, A., Benisty, M., Stolker, T., et al. 2017, The Messenger, 169, 32 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ginski, C., Stolker, T., Pinilla, P., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Golub, G. H., Heath, M., & Wahba, G. 1979, Technometrics, 21, 215 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Haffert, S. Y., Bohn, A. J., de Boer, J., et al. 2019, Nat. Astron., 3, 749 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hansen, P. C., & O’Leary, D. P. 1993, SISC, 14, 1487 [Google Scholar]
  35. Högbom, J. 1974, A&AS, 15, 417 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kalas, P. G., Rajan, A., Wang, J. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 32 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Keppler, M., Benisty, M., Müller, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Keppler, M., Teague, R., Bae, J., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A118 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lagrange, A. M., Langlois, M., Gratton, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, L8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  40. Langlois, M., Dohlen, K., Vigan, A., et al. 2014, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 9147, 91471R [Google Scholar]
  41. Langlois, M., Pohl, A., Lagrange, A.-M., et al. 2018, A& A, 614, A88 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lefkimmiatis, S., Ward, J. P., & Unser, M. 2013, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 22, 1873 [Google Scholar]
  43. Macintosh, B., Graham, J. R., Ingraham, P., et al. 2014, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 12661 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mahalanobis, P. C. 1936, National Institute of Science of India [Google Scholar]
  45. Maire, A. L., Langlois, M., Dohlen, K., et al. 2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 9908, 990834 [Google Scholar]
  46. Marois, C., Lafreniere, D., Doyon, R., Macintosh, B., & Nadeau, D. 2006, ApJ, 641, 556 [Google Scholar]
  47. Milli, J., Engler, N., Schmid, H. M., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A54 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. Molina, R. 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 16, 1122 [Google Scholar]
  49. Muto, T., Grady, C., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. 1999, Numerical Optimization, Springer Series in Operations Research (New York: Springer) [Google Scholar]
  51. Olofsson, J., Samland, M., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A108 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pairet, B., Jacques, L., & Cantalloube, F. 2019, Proceedings of SPARS’19, 1, 1 [Google Scholar]
  53. Perrin, M. D., Duchene, G., Millar-Blanchaer, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 182 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pinte, C., van der Plas, G., Menard, F., et al. 2019, Nat. Astron., 3, 1109 [Google Scholar]
  55. Pohl, A., Sissa, E., Langlois, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A34 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  56. Price, D. J., Cuello, N., Pinte, C., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1270 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pustelnik, N., Benazza-Benhayia, A., Zheng, Y., & Pesquet, J.-C. 2016, Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 1 [Google Scholar]
  58. Quanz, S. P., Avenhaus, H., Buenzli, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, L2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ramani, S., Blu, T., & Unser, M. 2008, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 17, 1540 [Google Scholar]
  60. Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. 1992, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 60, 259 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schmid, H. M., Bazzon, A., Roelfsema, R., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sissa, E., Olofsson, J., Vigan, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 613, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  63. Smirnov, O. M. 2011, A&A, 527, A106 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  64. Starck, J.-L., Donoho, D. L., & Candès, E. J. 2003, A&A, 398, 785 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stein, C. M. 1981, Ann. Stat., 1135 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tarantola, A. 2005, Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation (SIAM) [Google Scholar]
  67. Thiébaut, E. 2002, in Astronomical Data Analysis II, Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 4847, 174 [Google Scholar]
  68. Thiébaut, E., & Conan, J.-M. 1995, JOSA A, 12, 485 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tikhonov, A. N. 1963, Sov. Math. Dokl. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tinbergen, J. 2005, Astronomical Polarimetry (Cambridge University Press), google-Books-ID: SAS4JzAaMxkC [Google Scholar]
  71. Titterington, D. M. 1985, A&A, 144, 381 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  72. van Boekel, R., Henning, T., Menu, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 132 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. van Holstein, R. G., Snik, F., Girard, J. H., et al. 2017, Proc. SPIE, 10400, 1040015 [Google Scholar]
  74. van Holstein, R. G., Girard, J. H., de Boer, J., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A64 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  75. van Holstein, R. G., Stolker, T., Jensen-Clem, R., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A21 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  76. Vigan, A., Langlois, M., Dohlen, K., et al. 2014, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 9147, 91474T [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.