Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 712, August 2026
Article Number A28
Number of page(s) 12
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202659061
Published online 31 July 2026

© The Authors 2026

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.

1 Introduction

Dense environments such as galaxy clusters and massive groups are dominated by early-type galaxies that no longer show active star formation in their stellar populations, whereas star-forming late-type galaxies are mostly found in low-density environments such as the field, low-mass groups, or the outskirts of galaxy clusters. This so-called morphology density relation has been established for many decades (e.g. Oemler 1974; Dressler 1980; Whitmore et al. 1993; Fasano et al. 2000, 2015; Shimakawa et al. 2021; Pérez-Millán et al. 2023) and implies that the environment greatly affects the evolution of galaxies, in particular in terms of when and how star formation proceeds.

Several phenomena have been proposed that can alter the morphologies, gas content, and consequently, the star formation history (SFH) of galaxies in dense environments, such as rampressure stripping (e.g. Gunn & Gott 1972), galaxy mergers (e.g. Zwicky 1951), or tidal interactions (Gallagher & Ostriker 1972; Moore et al. 1996). Ram-pressure stripping refers to the stripping of gas from a galaxy by hydrodynamic interactions with the intracluster medium (see Cortese et al. 2021 and Boselli et al. 2022 for recent reviews). This process has been studied in detail with observations (e.g. Poggianti et al. 2017) as well as simulations (e.g. Yun et al. 2019). It was shown to be able in particular to remove neutral gas from a galaxy, while the molecular gas remains and is consumed by ram-pressure-induced star formation, which ultimately shuts star formation down. Similarly, tidal interactions or even mergers with galaxies can trigger strong bursts of star formation while simultaneously removing hot gas (e.g. Balogh et al. 2000). This quickly depletes the galaxy gas reservoir.

The shallow gravitational potentials of low-mass galaxies make them particularly susceptible to such processes, and hence, dwarf galaxies offer a unique laboratory to explore these phenomena and their effect on the SFH of a galaxy (e.g. Kenney et al. 2014; Stierwalt et al. 2015; Boselli et al. 2021; Kleiner et al. 2023). We study an especially interesting target that can provide insights into how dense environments shape the star formation and the evolution of low-mass galaxies. NGC 1427A is an irregular dwarf galaxy in the nearby Fornax galaxy cluster (D ~ 20 Mpc; Blakeslee et al. 2009). The morphology of this galaxy is peculiar. Its arrow-head shape points towards the south-west, and it has blue colours in optical images (e.g. Cellone & Forte 1997). NGC 1427A has been at the centre of a long-standing debate about its nature, and ram-pressure stripping, tidal interactions, and galaxy mergers have all been proposed to be the cause of its morphology and properties (Cellone & Forte 1997; Hilker et al. 1997; Chanamé et al. 2000; Georgiev et al. 2006; Sivanandam et al. 2014; Mora et al. 2015; Lee-Waddell et al. 2018; Mastropietro et al. 2021; Serra et al. 2024).

Based on multi-band optical observations, Cellone & Forte (1997) described the peculiar morphology of NGC 1427A as having a distorted, ring-like structure on a diffuse stellar background. They further noted the presence of a clump to the north of the disc, which since then has been denoted as the northern object or northern clump (see Fig. 1). Cellone & Forte (1997) interpreted the morphology, colours, and the presence of the northern object as a sign of an ongoing merger that possibly triggered the evident star formation across NGC 1427A. This proposition was challenged by Chanamé et al. (2000), who presented long-slit observations of bright H II regions and found a consistent velocity pattern between the main body of NGC 1427A and the northern object. Similarly, Hilker et al. (1997) found the northern object to be embedded in the diffuse stellar light within a symmetrical distribution and proposed it to be an original part of NGC 1427A. Further, Hilker et al. (1997) identified a wealth of young stellar clusters and H II regions in the southern part of the galaxy and suggested that star formation was triggered within the last few hundred million years, possibly as a consequence of ram-pressure stripping. A similar conclusion was drawn by Mora et al. (2015), who used deep imaging to study the star cluster population of NGC 1427A and proposed that the most recent star formation episodes occurred ~4 Myr ago.

Lee-Waddell et al. (2018) questioned whether ram-pressure stripping might have caused the morphology of NGC 1427A. Based on H I observations from the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA), they identified a H I tail pointing towards the south-east, perpendicular to the direction suggested by the young stellar populations in the arrow-head appearance of NGC 1427A, but away from the centre of Fornax. Instead of ram-pressure stripping, Lee-Waddell et al. (2018) proposed that the H I tail was caused by tidal interactions that also triggered star formation within the stellar body. Additionally, they again suggested that the northern object might be still merging with the main galaxy while already having joined the NGC 1427A rotating disc. Mastropietro et al. (2021) presented tailored hydrodynamical simulations of NGC 1427A-like dwarf galaxies (albeit less massive, as pointed out by Serra et al. 2024). They were able to reproduce the H I tail and stellar morphology from a combination of ram-pressure stripping and tidal interactions with the potential of the Fornax cluster. In their scenario, the northern object was simply a star-forming clump.

Recently, Serra et al. (2024) presented deep MeerKAT H I observations of NGC 1427A. In their high-resolution data, they were able to detect the H I tail out to ~70 kpc. Based on the complex gas kinematics, length, and width of the H I tail, Serra et al. (2024) proposed that the tail might have started out from a high-speed tidal interaction or galaxy merger that started at least 300 Myr ago, but was then shaped by ram-pressure stripping.

We built on these previous studies by exploring the evolutionary history of NGC 1427A through the lens of its stellar and star cluster populations. We employed integral-field spectroscopy in conjunction with optical imaging to study the SFH of NGC 1427A from its stellar light and its star cluster population. A complementary paper (Carvajal et al. 2026) presents a comprehensive analysis of NGC 1427A by combining integral-field spectroscopic data with data from other wavelengths. We describe the available data in Sect. 2 and our spectroscopic analysis in Sect. 3. The analysis of the star cluster properties from fitting of their spectral energy distributions (SEDs) is described in Sect. 4 and compared to the stellar population analysis in Sect. 5. We discuss our results in Sect. 6 and conclude in Sect. 7.

2 Data

To study NGC 1427A and its star cluster content, we used data from the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE). To complement this spectroscopic dataset, we used publicly available deep photometric catalogues of sources in the Fornax cluster obtained with OmegaCam as part of the Fornax Deep Survey (FDS; Iodice et al. 2016).

2.1 MUSE data

MUSE is an integral-field spectrograph mounted at the Very Large Telescope of the European Southern Observatory on Cerro Paranal in Chile (Bacon et al. 2010). In the wide-field mode, MUSE provides a field of view (FOV) of 1′ × 1′ on the sky with a spatial sampling of 0.2″ per pixel. In the wavelength direction, MUSE provides a spectrum in the optical wavelength regime from 4700 to 9300 Å, sampled at 1.25 Å.

We made use of archival MUSE data of NGC 1427A, obtained in 2015 (programme ID 094.B-0612, PI: Mora), combined with newer data obtained in 2022 (programme ID 110.23VM, PI: Fahrion). The older data cover the western part of the main body of NGC 1427A, while the newer observations cover the eastern part as well as the northern object. The newer data were taken using the adaptive-optics (AO) system, and the older data were acquired without AO.

Using MUSE pipeline version 2.8.7 (Weilbacher et al. 2020) implemented within ESOREX1, we reduced the individual exposures following the standard prescriptions according to the instrument manual. Because the data from 2015 had no dedicated sky observations, the sky reduction was done from the science exposures themselves. As NGC 1427A covers large portions of the FOV, the standard parameters erroneously include the extended nebular emission, leading to sky residuals at the position of emission lines. To account for this, we set the SKYMODEL_FRACTION and SKYMODEL_IGNORE parameters to 0.03 and 0.005 in the esorex scipost recipe, respectively. For the data from 2022, we used the dedicated sky exposures for sky reduction following the standard recipes.

In the last step, we combined all the individual exposures into a final data cube. During the observations of the main body in 2022, several observing blocks had to be restarted and repeated due to changing weather conditions during the observations. As some of the interrupted OBs nonetheless provided useful data, the final data cube has a slightly varying depth across the FOV. Figure 1 shows a red-green-blue image of NGC 1427A created from synthetic V, R, I images obtained from the MUSE data cube. Regions with strong Hα emission show green colours.

2.2 Fornax Deep Survey data from OmegaCam

The Fornax cluster was imaged with OmegaCam at the Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) as part of the FDS (Iodice et al. 2016; Venhola et al. 2018). The data are publicly available and contain deep images in u, g, r, and i filters of the central 28 square degrees of Fornax. Cantiello et al. (2020) presented an extensive catalogue of compact sources sources extracted from the OmegaCam data, containing in total 1.7 million sources with ugri photometry in the AB magnitude system with aperture corrections already applied. Cantiello et al. (2020) presented an example study focusing on globular clusters, but the full sample also includes other compact sources such as younger star clusters. As it is a photometric sample, contamination from background galaxies and foreground stars is also possible.

We selected all sources in the ugri catalogue in a 140″× 140″ square centred on NGC 1427A, which covers the MUSE FOV. In this region, the FDS catalogue contains 267 sources. We used these sources as our initial star cluster candidate sample. We note that NGC 1427A was also observed with the Hubble Space Telescope in multiple filters (see e.g. Georgiev et al. 2006), but we chose to use the ground-based data instead because of the close match in spatial resolution to the MUSE data and homogeneous photometric sampling across the MUSE mosaic FOV (Fig. 1). However, we note that the limited spatial resolution can lead to the blending of associations of stars and star clusters.

Thumbnail: Fig. 1 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 1

Left: g-band image from FDS (Iodice et al. 2016) shown in greyscale, illustrating the arrow-head shape of NGC 1427A, which points towards the south-west. In comparison, the cyan contours show part of the MeerKAT H I contours (from Serra et al. 2024, 21″ beam size, contours at 1, 10, 100, and 1000 Jy beam−1 m s−1), which demonstrate a H I tail pointing towards the south-east. The MUSE pointings are indicated with red squares. Right: false-colour image of NGC 1427A, reconstructed from MUSE data (R: I-band, G: R-band, and B: V-band images created from the MUSE cube). The scale bar refers to 10″, corresponding to 1 kpc at a distance of 20 Mpc. The MUSE image spans ~2′ × 2′ (12 × 12 kpc). North is up, and east is to the left.

3 Spectroscopic analysis

In the following, we describe the MUSE data analysis. For this, we used well established methods to constrain the stellar and gaseous content of NGC 1427A (see e.g. Emsellem et al. 2022; Bulichi et al. 2023).

3.1 Binned maps

To obtain binned maps from the MUSE data, we use the Data Analysis Pipeline (DAP)2, which aims to obtain high-level science products from integral-field spectroscopy data such as MUSE data. It was originally written to be used for PHANGS-MUSE and is described in Emsellem et al. (2022).

The DAP follows several steps. In a first step, the individual spectra are re-binned to a logarithmic wavelength sampling and corrected for foreground extinction using the extinction law from Cardelli et al. (1989) with a user-supplied E(B − V) value. For NGC 1427a, we selected E(B − V) = 0.012 according to the extinction map from Schlegel et al. (1998). Then, the data are spatially binned with the two-dimensional Voronoi binning scheme (Cappellari & Copin 2003) to a user-specified target signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). Finally, the binned spectra are fitted with the penalised pixel-fitting routine PPXF (Cappellari & Emsellem 2004; Cappellari 2017, 2023) to obtain the parameters of the line-of-sight velocity distribution and stellar population properties. The reported velocities are relative to the user-supplied systemic velocity, which we set to vsys = 2028 km s−1 (Bureau et al. 1996).

It is possible to fit the stellar and gaseous contribution to a spectrum simultaneously with PPXF. For the latter, PPXF also returns emission line fluxes and velocities which can be used in a further analysis of the ionised gas properties.

For NGC 1427A, we used Voronoi-binned maps with a S/N = 100, resulting in binned maps with 416 bins. This is a sufficient number to obtain a detailed view of the stellar kinematics and population parameters. As described below, for the gas kinematics we explored the binned and spaxel-by-spaxel results that give a much higher spatial sampling. For fitting with DAP, we use the wavelength range from 4700 Å to 7050 Å and mask sky line residuals.

3.2 Stellar and gas kinematics

Figure 2 shows the kinematics for the stellar and gaseous component. The latter is traced here by the Hα line, but other emission lines give similar velocity fields. We notice that NGC 1427A appears to be rotating in the stars and the ionised gas, but both components show a different velocity field. While the rotation axis of the gas appears to be perpendicular to the bar-like shape of NGC 1427A, the axis of the stellar rotation might be inclined. Carvajal et al. (2026) measured a difference in the rotation angle of Δθ ~ 31°. The bottom panel of Fig. 2 shows the velocity values extracted along the axis of maximum rotation, using a 100″ long and 6″ wide box to robustly determine the mean and standard deviation. As seen from the maps and these profiles, the gas reaches higher rotation amplitudes of ~±50 km s−1, while the stellar rotation only reaches ~±25 km s−1. This is not surprising, since it is expected that the stars (especially older populations) are dynamically hotter with a larger velocity dispersion contributing to the overall motion, while the ionised gas tends to be rotationally supported (e.g. Shetty et al. 2020). We find stellar velocity dispersions of ~20 km s−1 across the FOV, and gas velocity dispersions < 15 km s−1. However, those values are much smaller than the typical instrumental resolution of MUSE (~80 km s−1), so the derived σ per spaxel or bin is likely very uncertain.

As also noted from the H I kinematics presented in Serra et al. (2024), the gas kinematics within NGC 1427A appear rather regular with no obvious sign of disturbances as could be expected from a recent merger. Also in the stellar kinematics, the northern object follows the rotation of the galaxy.

Thumbnail: Fig. 2 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 2

Stellar (top left) and Hα (top right) velocity maps. The left panel shows a Voronoi-binned map with S/N = 100, while the right panel shows the Hα velocity from a spaxel-by-spaxel analysis. The black contours show the flux from the FDS g-band image (μg from 22 to 23.5 mag arcsec−1 in steps of 0.5). The dashed lines indicate axis of maximum rotation, and the bottom panels shows the extracted mean velocity profiles along these lines ±2 arcsec. Shaded areas indicate standard deviations.

3.3 Gas analysis

As one output, DAP returns emission line fluxes for a range of different emission lines including Hβ, Hα, [O III], [N II], and [S II]. From those, we can infer the star formation rate (SFR), dust attenuation, and gas metallicity. For a full analysis of the gas diagnostics, we refer to Carvajal et al. (2026) and follow-up work (Carvajal et al. 2026). We focused on the extinction, which is used later to constrain extinction in the SED fitting (Sect. 4), and the SFR to compare against the position of young clusters. In the following, we only consider spaxels that have a S/N > 5 for the used lines.

3.3.1 Dust attenuation

While DAP already corrects for foreground extinction, the intrinsic dust attenuation has to be accounted for. To do so, we use the Balmer decrement given by the flux ratio Hα/Hβ. This value has an intrinsic value of 2.86 (case B recombination, Osterbrock & Ferland 2006), and hence, measuring this ratio allows us to infer the colour excess E(B − V) caused by intrinsic extinction (see Calzetti et al. 2000), E(BV)=1.97log(Hα/Hβ2.86).Mathematical equation: $\[E(B-V)=1.97 ~\log \left(\frac{\mathrm{H} \alpha / \mathrm{H} \beta}{2.86}\right) .\]$(1)

This can be used to map dust extinction across the MUSE FOV as Fig. 3 shows. Further, it allows us to infer the intrinsic Hα luminosity, Lint(Hα)=100.4AHαLobs,Mathematical equation: $\[L_{\mathrm{int}}(\mathrm{H} \alpha)=10^{0.4 A_{\mathrm{H} \alpha}} L_{\mathrm{obs}},\]$(2)

with attenuation AHα = k(Hα)E(B − V), where k(Hα) is the value of the extinction curve at Hα. We used the Calzetti et al. (2000) extinction curve for star bursting galaxies, with RV = AV/E(B − V) = 4.05, to correct the measured emission line fluxes for extinction. We chose this extinction law to ensure self-consistency with the SED modelling described in Sect. 4, where the Calzetti et al. (2000) is used as well. As can be seen from the map in the bottom left panel in Fig. 3, the extinction is overall fairly low, but reaches AV > 1 mag in a few regions of intense star formation. The low extinction is not particularly surprising since NGC 1427A is a low-metallicity dwarf galaxy.

3.3.2 Ionisation sources from emission line ratios

Before continuing with the analysis of the emission lines, we tested whether the emission is caused by star formation or rather from other ionisation sources more associated with shocks (e.g. active galactic nuclei). For this reason, we plot emission line fluxes in BPT diagrams in the top panels of Fig. 3. As can be seen, almost all spaxels fall well below the star formation demarcation lines from Kewley et al. (2001) when using the classical BPT diagram (flux ratios [N II]/Hα vs [O III]/Hβ) or the [O I]/Hα vs [O III]/Hβ diagram. In the [S II]/Hα vs [O III]/Hβ diagram, several spaxels are above the demarcation line. Checking the spatial distribution of those spaxels, we find them to be located at the edges of the star-forming regions, indicating that the emission in those regions likely becomes dominated by diffuse ionised gas or outflows from star formation (e.g. Belfiore et al. 2022). In summary, the emission seen in NGC 1427A appears to be created by star formation. A follow-up paper (Carvajal et al. 2026) will discuss the ionisation diagnostics in more details.

3.3.3 Star formation rate density

From the extinction-corrected Hα fluxes in each of the star-forming spaxels, we calculate the Hα luminosity assuming a distance of 20 Mpc (Blakeslee et al. 2009) to the Fornax cluster. From this, the SFR density can be estimated using the relation from (Hao et al. 2011), SFR(Myr1)=1041.27Lint(Hα),Mathematical equation: $\[\operatorname{SFR}\left(M_{\odot} ~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}\right)=10^{-41.27} L_{\mathrm{int}}(\mathrm{H} \alpha),\]$(3)

with Lint(Hα) in erg s−1.

The right panel in Fig. 3 shows the SFR surface density (ΣSFR) for NGC 1427A in the MUSE FOV. As this map shows, the star formation is mainly located along the edges of the stellar body and in the northern object. Several distinct peaks are seen, likely indicating the position of star-forming regions and clumps.

We find a total SFR of 0.08 M yr−1 in this MUSE FOV. In their analysis of the MUSE data, Carvajal et al. (2026) find a similar value of SFR = 0.07 M yr−1 from the Hα flux. These two spectroscopic values are slightly higher than the values reported by Mora et al. (2015) of 0.05 M yr−1, and Georgiev et al. (2006), who found 0.057 M yr−1, both based on Hα narrow-band photometry. The differences are likely the result of the diverse extinction treatments and adopted distances.

Thumbnail: Fig. 3 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 3

Overview of the emission line analysis. Top panels: BPT diagrams showing the flux ratios of [OIII]/Hβ in comparison with [NII]6584Å/Hα (left), [SII]6717+6731Å/Hα (middle), and [OI]6300Å/Hα (right). Only spaxels where the relevant lines have S/N > 5 are shown. The solid grey lines show the demarkation line between AGN and star formation regions from Kewley et al. (2006), the grey dashed line shows the demarkation lines from Kauffmann et al. (2003). Bottom panels: Extinction map (left) showing the V-band extinction assuming the extinction law from Calzetti et al. (2000). Right: surface density of the SFR obtained by converting the Hα flux. The greyscale image in the background shows the flux of the MUSE white-light image for visualisation.

3.4 Stellar ages and metallicities

To fit the stellar populations with DAP, a library of stellar population models has to be provided. We chose the E-MILES models3 (Vazdekis et al. 2010, 2016), which are well-established stellar population models based on empirical spectra. Typically, the E-MILES models based on the Padova+00 isochrones (Girardi et al. 2000) cover ages from 63 Myr and 17.78 Gyr. Since NGC 1427A is a star-forming dwarf galaxy that likely hosts younger stars than this lower age limit, we complemented the standard E-MILES library with the younger models described in Asa’d et al. (2017), which reach ages of 6.3 Myr. To create a regular grid of models, we selected ages between 6.3 Myr and 15.8 Gyr and metallicities between [M/H] = −1.71 and 0.0 dex. In total, we used 295 different models.

We show the resulting light-weighted metallicity and age maps in Fig. 4. Only bins with S/N > 90 are shown. As can be seen, the maps are overall relatively flat with weak trends showing lower metallicities at older ages. The metallicity of the northern object (mean metallicity of ~−1.0 dex) appears to be slightly lower than that of the main body (⟨[M/H]⟩ = −0.92 dex), similar to the region between the main body and the northern object.

DAP also produces mass-weighted maps that show similar behaviour, however, with offset mean values. While the mean light-weighted age of NGC 1427A across the FOV is ~800 Myr, the mean mass-weighted age is ~6 Gyr, illustrating that even though NGC 1427A is forming stars at the moment, most of the mass is still found within the old populations.

Thumbnail: Fig. 4 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 4

Maps of stellar population properties. Left: light-weighted metallicity. Right: light-weighted age. The greyscale image in the background shows the flux image of the MUSE white-light image. The white contours show the extent of the Hα flux to guide the eye.

4 Star cluster properties

The main focus of this paper is to understand the evolutionary history of NGC 1427A from the integrated light of the stellar body and its star cluster population. To analyse the star clusters, we used an SED fitting of star cluster candidates using BAGPIPES4 (Carnall et al. 2018, 2019, 2020), a Bayesian method to fit SEDs with flexible models.

4.1 Fitting photometric candidates

Typically, SEDs are fit using photometry in multiple bands to obtain redshifts, masses, and SFHs of galaxies in the local Universe and at higher redshifts (e.g. Carnall et al. 2024; Leung et al. 2025). We did not wish to constrain the SFH of the full galaxy with SED fitting, but rather the ages and masses of the star clusters to employ them as surviving tracers of main star formation bursts. For this reason, we started by running BAGPIPES on all sources in the FDS catalogue using the FDS magnitudes in the u, g, r, and i filters with their reported uncertainties.

The BAGPIPES code is implemented in Python and provides flexible SED fitting to describe the stars, gas, and dust of galaxy spectra. The user can build models of varying complexity by including different prescriptions for the SFH, dust absorption, or nebular emission. Within BAGPIPES, the Bruzual & Charlot (2003) stellar population models (2016 version) are included with a Kroupa initial mass function (Kroupa 2001). Different prescriptions for dust attenuation are available, including the extinction law from Calzetti et al. (2000). The nebular emission is modelled using the CLOUDY code (Ferland et al. 2017).

To limit the complexity of the fitted model, we used a single burst model to describe the SFH of the star clusters that is defined by a single age, metallicity, mass, and extinction. We included nebular emission with a fixed ionisation parameter (set to log(U) = −35) that adds emission lines for populations younger than ~10 Myr, and we fixed the redshift to that of NGC 1427a. Thanks to the MUSE data, we can already constrain the extinction to be rather low. For all star cluster candidates where the extinction map is greater than 0, we used Gaussian priors on AV from MUSE with a dispersion of σ = 0.2 mag. In other cases, we allow conservative flat priors between 0 and 2 mag. Due to the flat overall metallicity profile, we fixed the metallicity to −0.5 dex when only fitting the photometry. Doing so, only age and mass are fully free in the fitting, which alleviates the disadvantage of only using four filters.

4.2 Spectroscopic candidates

For a subsample of bright clusters, we used BAGPIPES to fit the MUSE spectra and the OmegaCam photometry simultaneously. The following describes how we extracted the spectra from MUSE before fitting with BAGPIPES.

4.2.1 Extracting star cluster spectra

To detect star cluster candidates in the MUSE data, we first subtracted the background from the MUSE white-light image using PHOTUTILS6 background estimation routines with a median filter of box size of 5 × 5 pixels and kernel size of 3 × 3 pixels. In this residual image, we detected all sources that are 3σ above the background rms. Matching those against sources that have magnitudes from the FDS catalogue yields 162 initial cluster candidates.

For those, we extracted their spectra using a Gaussian-weighted circular aperture with a FWHM of 0.8″ (4 pixels) to boost the signal from the compact sources. To account for the background, similar to aperture photometry, we also extracted a background spectrum in an annulus around each source using an inner radius of 5 pixel (1.0″) and outer radius of 7 pixels, and subtracted this background spectrum from the source spectrum.

To match the flux with the photometry before SED fitting, we extracted synthetic r-band magnitudes from the MUSE spectra using synphot (STScI Development Team 2018) and multiplied the MUSE spectra with the ratio between the OmegaCam and synthetic magnitudes.

4.2.2 Simultaneous fit of photometry and spectroscopy

In addition to the photometric fits, we used BAGPIPES to fit the cluster candidates that have FDS photometry and a MUSE spectrum. BAGPIPES offers the possibility to fit photometry and spectroscopy simultaneously, as the stellar population models from Bruzual & Charlot (2003) have been updated to provide model spectra at a resolution of 2.5 Å from 3525 to 7500 Å using the MILES stellar spectral library (Falcón-Barroso et al. 2011). In the spectroscopic fits we also used a single burst model, and again constrained the extinction based on the map from Fig. 3, but we left the metallicities free.

We inspected the fits manually and found that the fit fails in some cases, especially when the signal-to-noise of the spectrum is low (<5 pix−1 in the continuum). In other cases, the photometry does not seem to follow any SED within the model library, often because the u-band flux appears to be much higher than seems reasonable. To get a reliable sample, we removed the cluster candidates in which no convincing fit to the spectroscopy and photometry was found, as well as the ones where even the photometry-only fits were not able to reproduce the fluxes. In the end, we keep 58 star clusters with good fits to spectroscopy and photometry. In Fig. 5, we show three examples of successful fits. For comparison, Fig. A.1 shows three examples of unsuccessful fits.

4.3 Comparing photometric and spectroscopic fits

The 58 clusters with good quality SED fits to photometry and spectroscopy allowed us to test how reliable the results become when only the photometry based on the four FDS filters is fitted. Figure 6 shows the comparison in derived cluster ages and masses between fitting photometry only and combining photometry and spectroscopy. As can be seen, the uncertainties are much smaller in the spectroscopic fits, but overall the results are comparable. Given that we only fit a very simple single burst model and could constrain the extinction from the MUSE data directly, this is perhaps not too surprising, but it is encouraging for the larger sample of clusters with only photometric measurements.

For this reason, we selected our final star cluster catalogue using the 58 sources for which BAGPIPES was able to fit spectroscopy and photometry and complemented this sample with the cluster candidates without spectroscopy or low resolution spectra, but where the BAGPIPES models could reproduce the fluxes in the four FDS bands sufficiently. In total, this catalogue contains 222 sources. Besides the brightest two sources that could be identified as foreground stars, and two background galaxies that were visually identified, the selected sources cover almost the full magnitude range of the OmegaCam sample (g = 25–20 mag).

Thumbnail: Fig. 5 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 5

Examples of successful SED fits. For these star clusters, the FDS fluxes (orange) and the MUSE spectra (grey) were fitted with BAGPIPES. The best-fit model SED is shown in purple in the region without spectroscopy and in blue in the region of the MUSE spectrum. Corresponding model fluxes are shown by the dark blue squares. The shaded regions and the extension of the squares span between the 16th and 84th percentiles of the posteriors. Best-fitting age and metallicity are shown in the top left panel.

4.4 Star cluster properties across NGC 1427A

Figure 7 shows the results from the SED fitting. The first three panels show the ages, metallicities, and masses of the star clusters for the photometric-only and photometry + spectroscopy samples. While young clusters are distributed all over the galaxy, the brighter young clusters with available spectroscopy are mainly found along the edges of the galaxy and in the northern object where the SFRs reach higher values (Fig. 3). In the inner regions of the galaxy, the star clusters are slightly older, and at least two old star clusters (globular clusters) are located within the galaxy, at least in projection. The metallicities of the star clusters varies, but no clear trend is discernable. The star cluster masses cover the range log(M/M) ≈ 3.5–6.0, and seem to reach log(M/M) ≈ 5–5.5 at the edges of the galaxy whereas the star clusters in the northern object are less massive.

The right panel of Fig. 7 shows the line-of-sight velocities of the star clusters with available MUSE spectra. As the redshift was used as a fixed parameter in the BAGPIPES fits, those velocities were obtained by fitting the star cluster spectra directly with PPXF. We find that all 58 star clusters with spectroscopic data have stellar and gaseous velocities in agreement with NGC 1427A, in a range between 1950 and 2100 km s−1. In a few cases, especially for young clusters dominated by emission lines, the stellar velocities have uncertainties Δv > 30 km s−1. As seen when placed on the stellar velocity map, the star clusters generally follow the rotation of the galaxy. Especially the older clusters closely follow the stellar velocity field of NGC 1427A, while others have line-of-sight velocities that more closely match the gas velocities (Fig. 2). A few clusters (especially ones with large velocity uncertainties) show slight deviations from the underlying rotation.

Figure 8 shows the age-mass and age-metallicity distributions of the star clusters for which spectra and photometry were used in the SED fits. The age–mass plane shows a clear correlation in the sense that older clusters are more massive. We believe that this is caused by two effects: on the one hand, young clusters of the same stellar mass are much brighter in optical bands than their older counterparts, creating an age-dependent detection limit. On the other hand, low-mass clusters dissolve quickly in the tidal fields of galaxies (e.g. Lamers et al. 2005; Gieles et al. 2006; Bastian et al. 2012), and only massive clusters can survive for several hundreds of million years or even billions of years. Consequently, we also observe a larger scatter in stellar masses for younger clusters than for older ones. In any case, we find that no star clusters with masses log(M/M) ≳ 5.5 were formed in the last 100 Myr.

In the age–metallicity plane, the younger clusters (Age < 107 yr) show metallicities between ~−1.2 to −0.3 dex, while the scatter for intermediate-age clusters is significantly larger, ranging from ~−2 dex to solar metallicities. We believe that this scatter stems from a combination of factors. Several of the metal-poor, intermediate age clusters also have rather low S/N < 10, which is reflected in large age and metallicity uncertainties. Additionally, the absence of emission lines in these clusters leads to larger uncertainties in the recovered ages. Better constraints on the properties of these clusters would come from information at longer or shorter wavelengths. The metallicity distribution of the young clusters compares well with the light-weighted mean metallicity from the stellar population fits (~−1 dex). The two oldest clusters are also some of the most massive and most metal-poor ones (−2.0 dex) and resemble Milky Way halo globular clusters. The age-metallicity relation of the old star cluster population with log(Age/yr) ≳ 8.5 suggests a gradual chemical enrichment of NGC 1427A with time.

Thumbnail: Fig. 6 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 6

Comparison between SED fit results for photometric measurements alone and combined with spectroscopy. Top: best-fit age. Bottom: best-fit mass.

Thumbnail: Fig. 7 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 7

Results of the star cluster SED fitting overplotted on the image of NGC 1427A. The first three panels show from left to right the star cluster ages, metallicities, and masses. Clusters where spectra and photometry were fitted simultaneously are shown as large symbols. Small symbols refer to photometric-only SED fits. Right panel: Binned stellar line-of-sight velocity field of NGC 1427A with star cluster velocities overplotted as circles. Small circles refer to clusters with velocity uncertainties larger than 30 km s−1.

Thumbnail: Fig. 8 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 8

Age, masses, and metallicities of star clusters. Top: age vs. mass, with photometric candidates in light blue. The inset shows histograms of the cluster masses. Bottom: age vs. metallicity, only available for clusters with photometry and spectroscopy. Small blue points show the values from the binned maps (see Fig. 4) and the blue shaded region shows their distribution with a kernel density estimator for visualisation.

5 The star formation history of NGC 1427A

In this section, we describe the SFH of NGC 1427A as revealed by the MUSE data and its star clusters. We then set this in context with the results from other works to describe the evolutionary history of NGC 1427A.

5.1 Comparing star clusters and stars

The rich data set for NGC 1427A allows us to study the SFH of NGC 1427A in two ways. Firstly, full spectrum fitting with DAP as a wrapper around PPXF can be used to obtain the best fitting distribution of ages and metallicities that reproduce the input spectra. Based on the regularised weights returned by PPXF, mean ages can be recovered, but also the SFH as mass- or light fraction versus age can be extracted. This approach has been used to study the SFHs of early- and late-type galaxies and their stellar components (e.g. Pinna et al. 2019; de Sá-Freitas et al. 2025). From the fits to the binned data, such non-parametric SFHs are available for all bins in the MUSE data.

Alternatively, we can use the star cluster ages as probes of the NGC 1427A SFH under the assumption that they were formed during intense star formation episodes. To compare the two approaches, we show the cluster age distributions in different regions as well as the corresponding light-weighted SFHs from PPXF from the binned MUSE data in Fig. 9 as histograms and grey curves, respectively. We differentiated here between the star-forming edge of the galaxy, the inner galaxy, and the northern object. The figure shows reasonable agreement between the SFH traced by the star clusters and from the full spectrum fitting of the stellar body. In both cases (i.e. clusters and stellar body), multiple peaks are visible and trends between regions become evident. While the inner galaxy and the star-forming edge show both an extended SFH and a cluster age distribution with multiple peaks, the star-forming edge shows a higher fraction of young clusters with log(Age/yr) ≲ 7.5 and a larger scatter towards young ages in the SFH derived from PPXF. Nonetheless, the star-forming edge and the inner galaxy show peaks in the SFH and the cluster age distributions for ages ~100 Myr, with a slightly broader peak for the inner galaxy region. Additionally, both regions show a broad peak at old ages (> 5 Gyr), suggesting an extended underlying distribution of old stellar populations.

Within the northern object, star clusters show a relatively broad age distributions from a few million years to several hundred million years, but the total number of clusters is small. The PPXF-derived SFH shows a unique distribution compared to the rest of the galaxy, with a broad component at old ages and a peak at the youngest ages. As the stellar population templates only contain ages down to 6.3 Myr, it is possible that even younger ages might be present. Nonetheless, old populations in the SFH as well as the broad cluster age distribution suggest (together with the comparable kinematics) that the northern object is simply a regular region of NGC 1427A that appears as a distinct environment only due to its recent star formation activity.

Thumbnail: Fig. 9 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 9

Star formation history of NGC 1427A as traced by the star clusters (pink histograms) and from the integrated stellar light (grey and blue lines). The different panels show the distributions for different regions in the galaxy as indicated by the different shading in the rightmost panel. In each panel, the SFHs for the different bins from the DAP analysis are shown in the grey lines, while the blue lines refer to the mean.

5.2 Possible caveats

The comparison between star cluster ages and the SFH derived from the integrated spectra could identify common trends, which is encouraging in building confidence in the results. Yet, while cluster ages and masses are likely reliable on a population level, individual measurements might be affected by biases.

Especially, the photometry-only sample can still be biased due to the low number of filters used in the fitting. For example, it is possible that this sample still contains a few contaminant sources such as faint foreground stars or unresolved background galaxies. Additionally, a broader wavelength coverage towards the infrared could help to further constrain the ages and detect still embedded clusters (e.g. Rodríguez et al. 2025). We tested matching with available VIRCam data from the Vista Hemisphere Survey (McMahon et al. 2013), but unfortunately these infrared observations are too shallow.

Additionally, the SFHs derived from PPXF within DAP also have systematic uncertainties. As previously mentioned, the stellar population models with the youngest ages reach 6.3 Myr, while younger populations might be present in the galaxy. Moreover, the nebular emission is not modelled self-consistently within PPXF to constrain the ages. Instead, the SFHs are derived from the stellar components after removing the emission lines.

6 The past of NGC 1427A

Starting from the early ground-based observations presented by Cellone & Forte (1997), the formation and evolutionary history of NGC 1427A has been debated. The findings made in the last two decades, have now started to paint a coherent picture of the past of NGC 1427A within the Fornax cluster environment.

6.1 Recent star formation activity

Any optical imaging of NGC 1427A immediately reveals it to be a star-forming galaxy with a peculiar morphology and a wealth of star-forming regions (e.g. Cellone & Forte 1997). Hilker et al. (1997) presented multi-band imaging of NGC 1427A and identified numerous young star clusters, especially along the southern edge. They originally estimated ages ≤2 Gyr, while Mora et al. (2015) estimated that the most recent star formation activity took place ~4 Myr ago. Our results are consistent with both studies, but now give a more detailed insight into the SFH of NGC 1427A.

As Fig. 9 reveals, the cluster age distribution and the SFH from the analysis of the MUSE spectra show multiple peaks. The majority of our clusters have ages <1 Gyr, with two peaks at ~ 10 and ~30–300 Myr, that are matched to peaks in the SFH. We find that some youngest clusters are found along the star-forming edge (see also Georgiev et al. 2006), as well as in the northern object, but especially the young clusters from the photometric sample are located over the full field.

The two peaks at ~10 Myr and a few 100 Myr can be interpreted within the context of the passage of NGC 1427A through the Fornax cluster. The presence of young clusters was originally interpreted as a consequence of ram-pressure stripping (e.g. Hilker et al. 1997; Sivanandam et al. 2014; Mora et al. 2015). However, Lee-Waddell et al. (2018) identified an H I tail almost perpendicular to the star-forming edge, pointing towards the south-east (away from the centre of Fornax). They suggested that the star formation was instead caused by a recent tidal interaction ~4 Myr ago. With their deeper MeerKAT observations, Serra et al. (2024) argued against ram-pressure stripping acting on the star-forming edge as no compression of H I was observed on the south-west side of the galaxy. Instead, they proposed that a galaxy interaction and ram-pressure stripping together caused the star formation in NGC 1427A and the extended H I tail towards the south-west. In their scenario, NGC 1427A experienced a tidal interaction or merger with another Fornax galaxy that started around 300 Myr ago that has originally removed gas from the galaxy disc. Then, ram-pressure stripping has further accelerated this gas and shaped it into the star-less H I tail seen today. With a multi-wavelength analysis, Carvajal et al. (2026) refined the picture of ram-pressure stripping in NGC 1427a further. They argue that the ram-pressure stripping is mainly acting along the line-of-sight, and reaches the ISM of NGC 1427A, affecting the star formation processes within the galaxy.

Our finding of a population of star clusters with ages of a few hundred million years and the corresponding SFH peak is consistent with the galaxy interaction or merger as proposed by Serra et al. (2024). We also find a population of younger star clusters (~10 Myr), suggesting that this interaction is still ongoing or that another galaxy or tidal encounter has led to the most recent star formation episode in NGC 1427A. While the broad spatial distribution of young clusters from the photometric sample could indicate a population of star clusters formed in stripped gas, further data on these clusters would be needed to confirm such a population. In the kinematics of star clusters with spectroscopy (Fig. 7), we do not see evidence of clearly stripped clusters as they should have blue-shifted velocities with respect to the galaxy, similar to the blue-shifted H I tail Serra et al. (2024).

6.2 Older populations

While the star cluster population mainly contains young clusters (<1 Gyr), the SFH reveals a prominent population of older stars (>1 Gyr), suggesting that NGC 1427A has formed stars over many billion years. The presence of old stars was already found in early imaging based on the presence of a diffuse stellar background and redder colours beyond the star-forming edge (e.g. Cellone & Forte 1997; Hilker et al. 1997). With the spatially resolved spectroscopy provided by MUSE, we found that this old population is present throughout NGC 1427A.

Further evidence for old populations comes from the presence of globular clusters, as identified by Georgiev et al. (2006). In our sample, we also find two clusters with globular cluster-like ages (>6 Gyr) and masses (log[M/M] ≈ 6.0), which are also metal-poor and found outside the star-forming edge. In general, Georgiev et al. (2006) found a rather smooth distribution of globular clusters, possibly reflecting the smoother distribution of the underlying old population. We also compared our sample to the candidates from Georgiev et al. (2006), finding two matches with available spectroscopy. In both cases, the spectra show emission lines and the SED fits reported ages of a few tens of million years. Unfortunately, the remaining GCs from Georgiev et al. (2006) are either outside of the MUSE data footprint or too faint to recover a useful spectrum.

6.3 The northern object

Originally proposed as the sign of an ongoing merger (Cellone & Forte 1997), long-slit data presented by Chanamé et al. (2000) found that the ionised gas kinematics of the northern object are consistent with the main galaxy. Similarly, Serra et al. (2024) found a smooth H I velocity field, indicating that this object is either a regular region within the galaxy or that any clear kinematic signature of a past merger has already been erased. With MUSE, we could confirm the coherent velocity field in the gas, but could also study the stellar kinematics. While there seems to be a general misalignment in the stellar and gas rotation axes (see Carvajal et al. 2026), the stellar kinematics of the northern object are consistent with the rest of the galaxy and no obvious disturbances that could be caused by a recent merger are evident.

Regardless of the kinematics, the stellar populations of the northern object do not set it apart from the main body of NGC 1427A. While perhaps slightly more metal-poor than NGC 1427A on average, the northern object does not appear as distinct component when studying the maps of ages, metallicities, or SFR. Similarly, the star clusters found in the northern object have similar ages as the young clusters found along the star formation edge and the SFH obtained from the integrated spectra reveal a similar underlying old population as in the rest of the galaxy. Taken together, all these results indicate that the northern object is an ordinary component of NGC 1427A that appears as a distinct region due to its recent star formation activity. However, while the northern object itself may not be the remnant of a recent merger, it is possible that its star formation activity was triggered due to the same recent interactions or tidal forces that have also triggered star formation in the other regions of NGC 1427A (Serra et al. 2024).

7 Conclusions

We presented a spectroscopic and photometric analysis of NGC 1427A, a low-mass star-forming galaxy in the Fornax cluster with a peculiar morphology likely caused by its passage through the Fornax galaxy cluster. In particular, we focused on the star cluster content and SFH of NGC 1427A. Our main conclusions are summarised below:

  • The velocity field of NGC 1427A based on MUSE data reveals rather regular rotation, in a similar fashion as indicated by larger-scale H I kinematics. However, the gas and stellar velocity fields appear to be misaligned, and the gas velocities reach higher amplitudes than the stars, suggesting that the stellar component is more dominated by random motions than the gas. The northern object does not appear as a kinematically distinct component, suggesting that it is part of the disc of NGC 1427A;

  • The peculiar morphology of NGC 1427A is driven by ongoing star formation and emission lines in the outskirts of the galaxy, which form a ring-like structure. In addition, the galaxy has an older main body. The northern object appears to be forming stars, but it is otherwise not distinct from the rest of the galaxy;

  • Stellar population analysis from the MUSE data found overall flat distributions of stellar ages and metallicities. Overall, the galaxy appears to be metal poor (~−0.9 dex), with a light-weighted mean stellar age of ~800 Myr, according to full spectrum fitting methods. We note that these results can only account for populations older than 6.3 Myr, but the presence of Hα indicates populations younger than ~10 Myr. In contrast, the mass-weighted mean age is ~6 Gyr, illustrating the mass-dominant old populations within NGC 1427a;

  • We applied SED-fitting methods to derive ages and masses of 222 star cluster candidates identified from ground-based OmegaCam photometry. For a subsample of 58 clusters, MUSE spectroscopy was integrated in the SED fitting. The comparison of spectroscopic and photometric fits found a relatively good agreement in ages and masses;

  • The star clusters show ages between ~3 Myr and several billion years, with masses down to 3 × 103 M. Two of the most massive clusters (~106M) are also the oldest, similar to metal-poor Milky Way globular clusters, with a trend of decreasing cluster mass with decreasing cluster age. The youngest clusters have the lowest masses, while intermediate-age clusters (a few 100 Myr to ~1 Gyr) span a wider mass range. A handful of these clusters reach masses >3 × 105.5 M and might therefore be considered globular cluster progenitors;

  • The comparison of the SFH of NGC 1427A based on a full spectrum fitting with the star cluster ages agreed in general, but highlighted that many of the star clusters represent the youngest population. We found a population of young clusters (~10 Myr) located along the south-western star-forming edge and in the northern object, as well as a population of intermediate-age clusters (a few hundred million years). The two populations have corresponding peaks in the SFH derived from fitting the MUSE spectra, which also shows an underlying old population (>1 Gyr) throughout NGC 1427A;

  • The evolutionary history of NGC 1427A appears to have been complex. The old stars and its globular cluster population suggest that this galaxy has been forming stars over a prolonged time, and its SFH was significantly affected by the galaxy passage through the Fornax cluster. The intermediate-aged cluster population was possibly formed when NGC 1427A interacted or merged with a galaxy a few hundred million years ago, as also suggested from H I observations Serra et al. (2024). However, the ionised gas emission and the young clusters further indicate recent and ongoing star formation, possibly triggered by a continuing interaction within Fornax.

We demonstrated once again that massive star clusters are lasting fossil tracers of star formation. Combined with other probes, they provide a promising path toward reconstructing the assembly history of a galaxy.

Acknowledgements

We thank the referee for helpful suggestions that have improved this work. KF acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101103830. THP and JPC acknowledge support from the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) grants: CATA-Basal FB210003 and Beca de Doctorado Nacional (JPC). This research made use of Astropy7, a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy (Astropy Collaboration 2013, 2018). This research made use of Photutils, an Astropy package for detection and photometry of astronomical sources (Bradley et al. 2021) and Specutils (Earl et al. 2021), an Astropy package for spectroscopy. Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory under ESO programmes 094.B-0612 and 110.23VM.

References

  1. Asa’d, R. S., Vazdekis, A., Cerviño, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3599 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Astropy Collaboration (Robitaille, T. P., et al.) 2013, A&A, 558, A33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Astropy Collaboration (Price-Whelan, A. M., et al.) 2018, AJ, 156, 123 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, SPIE Conf. Ser., 7735, 773508 [Google Scholar]
  5. Balogh, M. L., Navarro, J. F., & Morris, S. L. 2000, ApJ, 540, 113 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bastian, N., Adamo, A., Gieles, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2606 [Google Scholar]
  7. Belfiore, F., Santoro, F., Groves, B., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blakeslee, J. P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 556 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boselli, A., Lupi, A., Epinat, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A139 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boselli, A., Fossati, M., & Sun, M. 2022, A&A Rev., 30, 3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bradley, L., Sipócz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2021, astropy/photutils: 1.1.0 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bulichi, T.-E., Fahrion, K., Mernier, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A98 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bureau, M., Mould, J. R., & Staveley-Smith, L. 1996, ApJ, 463, 60 [Google Scholar]
  15. Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cantiello, M., Venhola, A., Grado, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A136 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cappellari, M. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cappellari, M. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3273 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379 [Google Scholar]
  23. Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 417 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carnall, A. C., Walker, S., McLure, R. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 695 [Google Scholar]
  25. Carnall, A. C., Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 325 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Carvajal, J. P., Puzia, T. H., Blaña, M., et al. 2026, A&A, 712, A29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cellone, S. A., & Forte, J. C. 1997, AJ, 113, 1239 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chanamé, J., Infante, L., & Reisenegger, A. 2000, ApJ, 530, 96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cortese, L., Catinella, B., & Smith, R. 2021, PASA, 38, e035 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. de Sá-Freitas, C., Gadotti, D. A., Fragkoudi, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dressler, A. 1980, ApJ, 236, 351 [Google Scholar]
  32. Earl, N., Tollerud, E., Jones, C., et al. 2021, astropy/specutils: V1.5.0 [Google Scholar]
  33. Emsellem, E., Schinnerer, E., Santoro, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A191 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. Falcón-Barroso, J., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Vazdekis, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A95 [Google Scholar]
  35. Fasano, G., Poggianti, B. M., Couch, W. J., et al. 2000, ApJ, 542, 673 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fasano, G., Poggianti, B. M., Bettoni, D., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3927 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al. 2017, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 53, 385 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gallagher, III, J. S., & Ostriker, J. P. 1972, AJ, 77, 288 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Georgiev, I. Y., Hilker, M., Puzia, T. H., et al. 2006, A&A, 452, 141 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gieles, M., Portegies Zwart, S. F., Baumgardt, H., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 793 [Google Scholar]
  41. Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C. 2000, A&AS, 141, 371 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gunn, J. E., & Gott, J. Richard, I. 1972, ApJ, 176, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hao, C.-N., Kennicutt, R. C., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 124 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hilker, M., Bomans, D. J., Infante, L., & Kissler-Patig, M. 1997, A&A, 327, 562 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  45. Iodice, E., Capaccioli, M., Grado, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 42 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kenney, J. D. P., Geha, M., Jáchym, P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 119 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kleiner, D., Serra, P., Maccagni, F. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A108 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Gieles, M., Bastian, N., et al. 2005, A&A, 441, 117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lee-Waddell, K., Serra, P., Koribalski, B., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1108 [Google Scholar]
  54. Leung, G. C. K., Finkelstein, S. L., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 26 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mastropietro, M., De Rijcke, S., & Peletier, R. F. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 3387 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. McMahon, R. G., Banerji, M., Gonzalez, E., et al. 2013, The Messenger, 154, 35 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  57. Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., & Oemler, A. 1996, Nature, 379, 613 [Google Scholar]
  58. Mora, M. D., Chanamé, J., & Puzia, T. H. 2015, AJ, 150, 93 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Oemler, Jr., A. 1974, ApJ, 194, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei [Google Scholar]
  61. Pérez-Millán, D., Fritz, J., González-Lópezlira, R. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1292 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pinna, F., Falcón-Barroso, J., Martig, M., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  63. Poggianti, B. M., Moretti, A., Gullieuszik, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 48 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rodríguez, M. J., Lee, J. C., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 137 [Google Scholar]
  65. Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 [Google Scholar]
  66. Serra, P., Oosterloo, T. A., Kamphuis, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  67. Shetty, S., Bershady, M. A., Westfall, K. B., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 101 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Shimakawa, R., Tanaka, T. S., Toshikage, S., & Tanaka, M. 2021, PASJ, 73, 1575 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sivanandam, S., Rieke, M. J., & Rieke, G. H. 2014, ApJ, 796, 89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Stierwalt, S., Besla, G., Patton, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. STScI Development Team 2018, synphot: Synthetic photometry using Astropy, Astrophysics Source Code Library [record ascl:1811.001] [Google Scholar]
  72. Vazdekis, A., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Falcón-Barroso, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1639 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  73. Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B., & Falcón-Barroso, J. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3409 [Google Scholar]
  74. Venhola, A., Peletier, R., Laurikainen, E., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A165 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  75. Weilbacher, P. M., Palsa, R., Streicher, O., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A28 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  76. Whitmore, B. C., Gilmore, D. M., & Jones, C. 1993, ApJ, 407, 489 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Yun, K., Pillepich, A., Zinger, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 1042 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zwicky, F. 1951, PASP, 63, 61 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5

We also tried other values for log(U) and found no significant change to the other parameters, especially in these photometric fits.

Appendix A Unsuccessful SED fits

Figure 5 shows three examples of successful SED fits with BAGPIPES. However, for many sources, the fits were unsuccessful, often due to limited S/N in the spectrum. Examples of those are shown in Fig. A.1. The top panel shows an example where neither the fluxes nor the spectrum could be fit successfully. This source was removed. The bottom two examples have low S/N spectra that did not enable a spectroscopic fit, however, the fluxes are reasonably well described by the best-fit model. These two sources were included in the photometry-only sample.

Thumbnail: Fig. A.1 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. A.1

Examples of unsuccessful SED fits. Top panel: Example where neither the spectrum nor the fluxes could be reproduced. Middle and bottom panels: Examples of low S/N spectra, where at least the fluxes could be reproduced.

All Figures

Thumbnail: Fig. 1 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 1

Left: g-band image from FDS (Iodice et al. 2016) shown in greyscale, illustrating the arrow-head shape of NGC 1427A, which points towards the south-west. In comparison, the cyan contours show part of the MeerKAT H I contours (from Serra et al. 2024, 21″ beam size, contours at 1, 10, 100, and 1000 Jy beam−1 m s−1), which demonstrate a H I tail pointing towards the south-east. The MUSE pointings are indicated with red squares. Right: false-colour image of NGC 1427A, reconstructed from MUSE data (R: I-band, G: R-band, and B: V-band images created from the MUSE cube). The scale bar refers to 10″, corresponding to 1 kpc at a distance of 20 Mpc. The MUSE image spans ~2′ × 2′ (12 × 12 kpc). North is up, and east is to the left.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 2 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 2

Stellar (top left) and Hα (top right) velocity maps. The left panel shows a Voronoi-binned map with S/N = 100, while the right panel shows the Hα velocity from a spaxel-by-spaxel analysis. The black contours show the flux from the FDS g-band image (μg from 22 to 23.5 mag arcsec−1 in steps of 0.5). The dashed lines indicate axis of maximum rotation, and the bottom panels shows the extracted mean velocity profiles along these lines ±2 arcsec. Shaded areas indicate standard deviations.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 3 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 3

Overview of the emission line analysis. Top panels: BPT diagrams showing the flux ratios of [OIII]/Hβ in comparison with [NII]6584Å/Hα (left), [SII]6717+6731Å/Hα (middle), and [OI]6300Å/Hα (right). Only spaxels where the relevant lines have S/N > 5 are shown. The solid grey lines show the demarkation line between AGN and star formation regions from Kewley et al. (2006), the grey dashed line shows the demarkation lines from Kauffmann et al. (2003). Bottom panels: Extinction map (left) showing the V-band extinction assuming the extinction law from Calzetti et al. (2000). Right: surface density of the SFR obtained by converting the Hα flux. The greyscale image in the background shows the flux of the MUSE white-light image for visualisation.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 4 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 4

Maps of stellar population properties. Left: light-weighted metallicity. Right: light-weighted age. The greyscale image in the background shows the flux image of the MUSE white-light image. The white contours show the extent of the Hα flux to guide the eye.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 5 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 5

Examples of successful SED fits. For these star clusters, the FDS fluxes (orange) and the MUSE spectra (grey) were fitted with BAGPIPES. The best-fit model SED is shown in purple in the region without spectroscopy and in blue in the region of the MUSE spectrum. Corresponding model fluxes are shown by the dark blue squares. The shaded regions and the extension of the squares span between the 16th and 84th percentiles of the posteriors. Best-fitting age and metallicity are shown in the top left panel.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 6 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 6

Comparison between SED fit results for photometric measurements alone and combined with spectroscopy. Top: best-fit age. Bottom: best-fit mass.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 7 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 7

Results of the star cluster SED fitting overplotted on the image of NGC 1427A. The first three panels show from left to right the star cluster ages, metallicities, and masses. Clusters where spectra and photometry were fitted simultaneously are shown as large symbols. Small symbols refer to photometric-only SED fits. Right panel: Binned stellar line-of-sight velocity field of NGC 1427A with star cluster velocities overplotted as circles. Small circles refer to clusters with velocity uncertainties larger than 30 km s−1.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 8 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 8

Age, masses, and metallicities of star clusters. Top: age vs. mass, with photometric candidates in light blue. The inset shows histograms of the cluster masses. Bottom: age vs. metallicity, only available for clusters with photometry and spectroscopy. Small blue points show the values from the binned maps (see Fig. 4) and the blue shaded region shows their distribution with a kernel density estimator for visualisation.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 9 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 9

Star formation history of NGC 1427A as traced by the star clusters (pink histograms) and from the integrated stellar light (grey and blue lines). The different panels show the distributions for different regions in the galaxy as indicated by the different shading in the rightmost panel. In each panel, the SFHs for the different bins from the DAP analysis are shown in the grey lines, while the blue lines refer to the mean.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. A.1 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. A.1

Examples of unsuccessful SED fits. Top panel: Example where neither the spectrum nor the fluxes could be reproduced. Middle and bottom panels: Examples of low S/N spectra, where at least the fluxes could be reproduced.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.