Our range of recovered BH mass estimates for J1652 (grey bar) in the context of the low-redshift M_BH–M_⋆ relation for all broad-line AGNs (blue solid line; Reines & Volonteri 2015) and for ellipticals with suppressed star formation (blue solid line; Kormendy & Ho 2013). Depending on the choice of line (Paβ, Hα, Hβ, and Mg II) and underlying assumptions (assignment of kinematic components to the broad line region, virial factor, f, dust attenuation, etc.), and considering the uncertainties, one could argue that J1652 is overmassive or falls onto the M_BH–M_⋆ relation. The uncertainty on the stellar mass is derived from considering all SED models explored with a similar goodness of fit (χ² within 5% of the best fit value). For context, we add a sample of massive high-redshift radio galaxies (green squares; De Breuck et al. 2010; Nesvadba et al. 2011), and unobscured X-ray AGNs at Cosmic Noon (purple circles; Suh et al. 2020).