EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 623 (March 2019) A&A, 623 (2019) A50 Full HTML
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 623, March 2019
Article Number A50
Number of page(s) 7
Section Planets and planetary systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834712
Published online 05 March 2019

© ESO 2019

1. Introduction

The search for Earth-like planets around late-type stars is one of the most active areas of modern astronomy. The radial velocity (RV) oscillations of the host stars induced by the motion of orbiting planets have been used to discover the first exoplanet and many others to date (e.g., Mayor et al. 2014). Moreover, to confirm candidates discovered by means of transits and measure their masses, it is necessary to measure the radial velocity oscillations of the host stars. This RV follow-up often leads to the discovery of additional nontransiting planets around the host stars, allowing a better characterization of the architectures of their planetary systems.

The advent of HARPS (Mayor et al. 2003) and HARPS-N (Cosentino et al. 2012) has pushed the RV measurement precision and long-term stability below 1 m s−1 on bright stars (V ≲ 8–10), while the recently commissioned ESPRESSO spectrograph aims at a precision of 0.1 m s−1 (Pepe et al. 2014)making it possible to detect the wobble of a planet like our Earth on a one-year orbit around a Sun-like star, provided that stellar intrinsic RV variations can be properly corrected. The amplitude of the Sun’s RV oscillation induced by the Earth’s motion is ~ 9.2 cm s−1, while amplitudes on the order of 2–4 m s−1 are observed in M dwarfs orbited by Earth-mass planets in their habitable zones (e.g., Affer et al. 2016).

The critical limitation in discovering Earth-like planets through the RV method is the intrinsic variability of their hosts that is produced by several physical processes. Photospheric granulation and p-mode oscillations can be averaged out by designing the observations in an appropriate way (Dumusque et al. 2011). Photospheric magnetic fields produce brightness inhomogeneities akin to sunspots and faculae that perturb the flux balance between the redshifted and the blueshifted portions of the disk of a rotating star leading to a systematic distortion of their spectral line profiles, which in turn induces an apparent variation in their RVs. Moreover, surface magnetic fields locally quench convective motions responsible for the apparent spectral line blueshifts, thus producing an apparent increase in the disk-integrated RV measurements (e.g., Saar & Donahue 1997; Meunier et al. 2010). These effects are modulated by the stellar rotation and the evolution of the photospheric magnetic fields in active regions generally showing a periodicity close to the stellar rotation period and its first two or three harmonics (Boisse et al. 2011). By correlating the RV variations with the chromospheric activity index (e.g., Lovis et al. 2011; Lanza et al. 2016) or with suitable indicators of the line profile distortions (e.g., Dumusque et al. 2014; Lanza et al. 2018), such intrinsic RV variations can be identified and corrected to some extent. However, there are other phenomena that can induce an apparent quasi-periodic RV variation in Sun-like stars that are more difficult to recognize because they are not directly associated with variations in activity indicators, for example a fluctuation in the meridional circulation as proposed by Makarov (2010). In the present work, we propose that r-mode oscillations recently detected in the Sun (Löptien et al. 2018) can be another phenomenon of this kind, which could potentially lead to false planetary detections in late-type stars.

2. Observations

The so-called r modes are the toroidal modes of oscillation of a rotating star (see, e.g., Papaloizou & Pringle 1978; Saio 1982) for which the dominant restoring force is the Coriolis force. They are associated with a pattern of radial vorticity of alternating sign that propagates in the retrograde direction in a reference frame that is co-rotating with the star.

Recently, Löptien et al. (2018) mapped the horizontal velocity field in the solar photosphere for the period 2010–2016 by using granules observed in intensity by HMI/SDO as tracers of the flow. By analyzing the sectoral power spectra of the radial component of vorticity, ζ, they discovered oscillations with frequencies corresponding to the classical sectoral Rossby waves. By construction, sectoral power spectra are obtained by projecting the spatial data onto spherical harmonics with equal angular degree l and azimuthal wavenumber m. Due to the “shrinking-Sun effect” (Löptien et al. 2016) the horizontal velocity maps obtained by granulation tracking could not be used to characterize modes with m ≤ 2. The nonsectoral power spectra did not reveal any additional modes of oscillation.

The detected r modes were identified through their frequencies in the co-rotating frame (see Sect. 3). The rms radial vorticity of the modes ranges between 0.75 × 10−8 and 2.42 × 10−8 s−1. Löptien et al. (2018) noted that the m = 3 sectoral mode displayed a double-peak structure in the power spectrum for 2010–2016, so the mode parameters were not studied in detail in this case. The e-folding lifetime of the vorticity pattern associated with individual solar r modes is up to 11 solar rotation periods, as indicated by the high quality factors of the peaks in the power spectrum.

Löptien et al. (2018) also confirmed the detection of r modes in the shallow subsurface layers using ring-diagram helioseismology. A recent time-distance helioseismology analysis by Liang et al. (2018) extends these results to deeper layers and a time interval of 21 yr (including data from SOHO/MDI). They confirm e-folding lifetimes of almost two years for the sectoral m = 3 and m = 5 modes and an upper limit for the maximum surface velocity of the undetected m = 2 mode of about 0.7 m s−1. Hanasoge &Mandal (2019) also confirmed the detection of sectoral modes with odd values of m, the only ones their specific normal-mode coupling method is sensitive to.

Evidence of r-mode oscillations in stars other than the Sun was obtained by Van Reeth et al. (2016) and Saio et al. (2018), among others, who analyzed photometric time series of the Kepler space telescope. These stars are early-type B and A main-sequence stars, γ Doradus variables, orstars in eccentric close binaries with strong tidal interactions, i.e., stars that are not the usual targets for planet search through the RV method because of their rapid rotation. The relative amplitudes of the light variations associated with r modes in these stars are on the order of δL∕L ~ 10−3–10−4. The horizontal velocity of their oscillations is on the order of vh ~ σ(δL∕L) GMR−2 Ω−2, where σ is the frequency of the modes, G the gravitation constant, M the mass of the star, R its radius, and Ω its rotation frequency (see, e.g., Provost et al. 1981; Saio 1982; Kepler 1984). Therefore, they have horizontal velocities on the order of km s−1, which is at least a factor of 103 larger than in the case of the Sun.

3. Model

The surface displacement ξ associated with an r mode is dominated by the toroidal component of displacement (see, e.g., Kepler 1984, Sect. IIb), (1)

where for a mode with spherical harmonic degree l and azimuthal order m we have (2)

In the above expression Θ is the colatitude measured from the stellar rotation axis, Φ is the longitude measured in the inertial frame of the observer, is a spherical harmonic function, and Klm fixes the amplitude of the mode. The frequency of oscillation in the inertial frame σobs is related to the stellar angular velocity Ω and the mode frequency σ in the co-rotating frame through (3)

where in the limit of slow uniform rotation (Ω2 ≪ GMR−3; Saio et al. 2018), (4)

In the inertial reference frame of a distant observer, the dipole sectoral mode has a vanishing frequency, so we consider only the effects of sectoral modes with l = m ≥ 2 on the RV of the star.

The velocity associated with an r mode with given l, m, and prescribed parameters is the total time derivative of ξ; its explicit expression can be found in Sect. III of Kepler (1984). We compute the radial velocity of each surface element by means of Eq. (68) of Kepler (1984) assuming an inclination angle i for the stellar rotation axis to the line of sight. For simplicity, we assume a star with the same radius as the Sun; an angular velocity Ω = 2.84738 μrad s−1, corresponding to the solar equatorial rotation period of 25.54 days; and a linear limb-darkening coefficient u = 0.684, appropriate for the continuum of the V passband (cf. Table 1 in Diaz-Cordoves et al. 1995).

To compute the RV of the star, we consider an average spectral line whose profile is obtained by integrating over the disk of the star the local line profiles emerging from the individual surface elements (cf. Lanza et al. 2011). The local line profile is assumed to be a Gaussian displaced by the local radial velocity computed as explained above. We include the effect of the limb-darkening variation in the continuum of the spectral lines, but other effects, such as the possible variation of the line absorption coefficient with the position on the disk of the star or the effects of temperature inhomogeneities in active regions, are not included for simplicity.

The RV of a star is generally measured by computing the cross-correlation function (CCF) between its spectrum and a binary line mask depending on its spectral type. The CCF is then fitted with a Gaussian and its central wavelength is used as a measure of the RV of the star (e.g., Baranne et al. 1996). In our case, we derive the RV by considering in place of the CCF the average spectral line profile computed above. Other methods for measuring the RV have been proposed by, among others, Galland et al. (2005), Anglada-Escudé & Butler (2012), and Astudillo-Defru et al. (2017) and have been applied to stars of spectral type A or F, having a relatively low number of spectral lines in their optical spectra and relatively fast rotation, or to M-type dwarfs.

A crucial parameter in the computation of our synthetic RV oscillations is the amplitude Kmm of the individual sectoral r modes. Guided by the solar observations (Löptien et al. 2018), we fix Kmm in order to have a maximum surface velocity of 2 m s−1 for each mode with m ≤ 5. We do not consider modes with l > m, which are not observed in the Sun.

A simplification of our approach is the neglect of the effects of differential rotation on r modes. As they are retrograde modes, their phase speed with respect to the local plasma will change with latitude as a consequence of the latitudinal differential rotation (Wolff 1998).

The amplitude Kmm may be larger in stars with a rotation rate and/or a spectral type different from those of the Sun. To make predictions of the r-mode amplitudes in late-type stars, the mechanisms of excitation and damping would have to be identified, but unfortunately we can currently only make conjectures about them.If r modes are excited by convection, we expect that stars with a convective flow faster than the Sun, such as main-sequence F-type stars, may display larger amplitudes. If they are excited by the shear associated with differential rotation (Saio et al. 2018), their amplitude may depend on the amplitude of the differential rotation in the radial and in the latitudinal directions.

4. Results

In Fig. 1 we plot the RV oscillations for a Sun-like star with sectoral r modes; the amplitude of each mode has been fixed to have a maximum surface velocity max {vsurf} = 2 m s−1. The surface velocity is defined as , where vΘ is the meridional and vΦ the azimuthal component of the velocity (see Sect. 3). The amplitude of the oscillations A0 (from minimum tomaximum velocity) is given in Table 1 together with their period and rms radial vorticity ζ assuming that the star is rotating with the solar rotation period of 25.54 days and considering an inclination i = 30° or i = 60°. For an inclination i = 0° or i = 90°, the amplitudes vanish because of the symmetry leading to a perfect cancellation of the integrated radial velocity. The rms radial vorticity is computed considering the velocity field in the ±20° latitude range to allow a direct comparison with the observations by Löptien et al. (2018). We assume here that the amplitude of the modes is not damped, which is a rather good approximation given the long lifetimes of the solar r modes (see Sect. 2). With our choice of the Kmm values, the rms vorticities of the simulated r modes are smaller by a factor of ≈1.5–2 than those observed by Löptien et al. (2018) for l = m ≥ 4, implying that our choice is conservative. Although m = 2 has not been observed and m = 3 is rather weak in comparison with m ≥ 4 in the solar case, the same magnitude is assumed for all the modes implemented in this work. This allows us to immediately see the increasing cancellation effects reducing the RV amplitudes of the modes with higher m when their variations are integrated over the stellar disk. Because the observed RV amplitude and rms vorticity scale in direct proportion to the maximum surface velocity for a given mode, it is simple to compute its RV amplitude for different amplitudes of the surface velocity (see the example below). Given our ignorance of the excitation and damping mechanisms of these modes in the Sun and late-type stars, we cannot rely on the theory to predict their amplitudes.

In our simulations, the sectoral modes giving the largest RV oscillations are m = 2, followed by m = 3 (see Table 1). If the maximum velocity of the modes is increased, for example to 4 m s−1, the amplitude of the RV oscillation produced bythe (2, 2) mode becomes 153 cm s−1 for i = 60°. The amplitude of the RV oscillations rapidly decreases with increasing m due to increasing cancellation of the velocity patterns when integrating over the disk of the star. For this reason, we consider only r modes with l ≤ 5. Although their frequencies are smaller than the rotation frequency in the co-rotating frame, in the observer’s frame they have positive frequencies σobs = [m − 2∕(m + 1)]Ω, tending to mΩ for large m (cf. Eqs. (3) and (4)).

In Fig. 2, we plot the periodogram of a simulated RV time series of 200 days with daily cadence and randomly missing observations amounting to 30% of the time to include the effect of bad weather. We only consider the contributions of the sectoral modes with m = 2 and 3 assumed to have a constant amplitude in a Sun-like star viewed with an inclination of 60°, and add a normally distributed random noise with standard deviation σn of 10 or 50 cm s−1. The periodogram is computed with the generalized Lomb-Scargle (GLS) formalism of Zechmeister & Kürster (2009). The red horizontal lines at a normalized power of 0.138 indicate the level corresponding to a false-alarm probability (FAP) of 1% as derived by analyzing 10 000 random shufflings of the time series. The level corresponding to a FAP of 5% (not shown) is 0.117. Therefore, the m = 2 mode is detected with high significance, while the FAP of the m = 3 mode is above 5% when we consider a noise with σn = 10 cm s−1. With a standard deviation of the noise σn = 50 cm s−1, the FAP of the m = 2 mode is 0.019, indicating that a higher noise level may hamper a clear detection of this r mode. Even if they are not significantly detected, we note that the effects of the modulations due to the m = 2, 3 modes remain hidden in the power spectrum and contribute to the intrinsic stellar RV variability at the 10 cm s−1 level.

We repeated the above calculations for our Sun for which the apparent latitude B0 of the center of the disk oscillates between − 7.°23 and + 7.°23 over a period of one year. Assuming again max{vsurf} = 2 m s−1, we find that the amplitude of the m = 2 mode is modulated between zero and a maximum of 24.5 cm s−1. For the m = 3 mode, we find a maximum amplitude of 7.1 cm s−1.

Because we observe the Sun from the Earth’s vantage point, and because of the modulation of the amplitude due to the annual variation of the apparent inclination of the solar rotation axis (B0 angle variations), the RV power of the m = 2 mode would be split into two peaks with periods of 20.22 and 22.74 days, respectively (cf. Wolff & Blizard 1986). The RV power of the m = 3 mode would be split into two equal peaks with periods of 10.82 and 11.5 days, respectively.

In Fig. 3, we plot the GLS periodogram of a simulated daily RV time series of the Sun as a star with a total extension of 200 days and missing observations covering 30% of the time. We consider two possible RV amplitudes for the sectoral m = 2 mode, i.e., 24.5 or 8.1 cm s−1, the latter corresponding to the upperlimit of 0.7 m s−1 for vsurf as found by Liang et al. (2018), and simulate both noiseless time series and time series with a random normal noise of standard deviation of 10 cm s−1. The red horizontal lines in the figure panels indicate the level of the normalized power corresponding to a FAP of 1%. We conclude that even a modest amount of noise can hamper a significant detection of the r modes in the disk-integrated solar RV observations. We note the splitting of the power of the r modes into two close peaks having periods shorter and longer than the periods predicted in the case of a fixed B0 angle, respectively, as a consequence of the yearlymodulation of B0 for an observer on the Earth.

The peaks of the m = 3 mode for the noiselesstime series (σn = 0) are higher in the lower panel of Fig. 3 because the variance of that time series is lower than the variance of the time series in the upper panel, thanks to the smaller amplitude of the m = 2 mode. Sincethe periodogram power is normalized to the weighted variance of the data around their mean (cf. Eq. (4) in Zechmeister & Kürster 2009), the normalized power of the signal of the m = 3 mode increases. On the other hand, the level of 1% FAP for the time series with σn = 10 cm s−1 is not modified because it is determined by considering the distribution of the maximum values of the GLS of 10 000 randomly shuffled time series that have no periodic signals, but have the same variance of the original time series which leads to the same normalized level.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Top panel: simulated RV variations of a Sun-like star produced by individual r modes, as seen by a distant observer, as a function of the time. The spin axis of the star has an inclination of i = 60° to the line of sight. Different line styles refer to different sectoral modes: the solid line is for m = 2 mode, the dotted line for m = 3, the dashed line for m = 4, and the dash-dotted line for m = 5. See Table 1 for the amplitude, the period, and the rms radial vorticity of each mode. Bottom panel: line-of-sight velocity on the disk for m = 2 at the four different phases a–d indicated by circles in the top panel. The color scale saturates at ± 2 m s−1: blue is toward and red is away from the observer. The plus symbols indicate the north pole and the black lines the equator.
Table 1

Peak-to-peak amplitudes A0 and sidereal oscillation periods of the RV variations produced by sectoral r modes in a Sun-like star inclined by i = 30° and i = 60°.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Top panel: periodogram of the simulated radial velocity time series of a Sun-like star showing sectoral r modes with m = 2 and 3 as seen with an inclination i = 60°. The RV amplitudes and the periods of the modes are given in Table 1; they correspond to a maximum horizontal velocity of the modes of 2 m s−1 at the stellar surface. The periodogram is normalized according to the definition of the GLS given by Zechmeister & Kürster (2009). A normally distributed random noise with a standard deviation σn of 10 cm s−1 was added. The vertical dashed line indicates the period of the m = 2 mode and the dotted line that of the m = 3 mode. The red horizontal line gives the level of 1% FAP as determined by analyzing 10 000 random shufflings of the original time series. Bottom panel: same as the top panel, but for a standard deviation of the noise σn of 50 cm s−1. Here the red horizontal line indicates the level corresponding to a FAP of 2%.
thumbnail Fig. 3

Top panel: periodogram of the simulated radial velocity time series of the Sun as a star with sectoral r modes with m = 2 and m = 3 as seen by anEarth observer. The RV maximum amplitude of the m = 2 mode is 24.5 cm s−1, while the amplitude of the m = 3 mode is 7.1 cm s−1; the periods of the modes are given in the text. These RV amplitudes correspond to a maximum horizontal velocity of the modes of 2 ms−1 at the surface of the Sun. The periodogram of a noiseless time series is plotted with a thin blue solid line, while the periodogram obtained adding a normally distributed random noise with a standard deviation σn = 10 cm s−1 is plotted with the thicker green solid line. The vertical dashed line indicates the period of the m = 2 mode and the dotted line that of the m = 3 mode, if the inclination B0 of the solar equator is fixed. The red horizontal line indicates the level of 1% FAP. Bottom panel: same as the top panel, but the maximum RV amplitude of the sectoral m = 2 mode is now assumed to be 8.2 cm s−1, corresponding to the upper limit for the amplitude of this mode found by Liang et al. (2018), while the amplitude of the m = 3 mode is still 7.1 cm s−1. The upper limit for the m = 2 mode corresponds to a maximum horizontal velocity of 0.7 m s−1 at the surface of the Sun.

5. Discussion

Due to their long lifetimes, the sectoral r modes are thought to produce RV oscillations that may be misinterpreted as being due to an orbiting Earth-mass planet. According to the above simulations, the sectoral m = 2 modes may have the highest amplitudes in RV measurements. Unfortunately, we currently have no observational constraints on the surface amplitude of these modes on the Sun. The m = 2 modes may or may not be excited to sufficiently large amplitudes to be detectable on Sun-like stars. Additional information from solar observations and theory will be required to estimate mode amplitudes. We note that it is not excluded that quadrupole r modes could be excited to significant amplitudes through tidal interaction with a close-in planet (Ogilvie 2014).

The frequencies of the RV oscillations of r modes in a star are close but not equal to the rotation rate Ω; specifically, they are 4Ω∕3 and 5Ω∕2 for the sectoral modes with m = 2 and 3. In the case of a star rotating like the Sun, this implies putative orbital periods of 19.16 and 10.22 days that correspond to planets with minimum masses of 0.22 and 0.07 Earth mass, respectively (see Table 1 and Wright 2017). Although some cases of RV signals with a period ratio close to 4/3 have been reported (e.g., Santos et al. 2014), other effects can contribute to produce peaks with the frequencies indicated above, notably spot intrinsic evolution, differential rotation (e.g., Reinhold & Gizon 2015), or the combination of differential rotation with spots on opposite hemispheres of a star (e.g., Collier Cameron et al. 2009). Therefore, we expect the power spectrum of real active stars to be rather complex with the signals of r modes not unambiguously detectable in all the cases, even if their amplitudes are sufficiently large.

The peak in the Fourier spectrum of the RV produced by an r mode may persist for long time intervals because modes are long lived. Given a quality factor Q ~ 10, this would produce a peak very similar to those generally attributed to the reflex motion induced by an orbiting planet unless a long time series with frequent sampling and covering several seasons is acquired to reveal the expected phase changes associated with the attenuation and re-excitation of the mode.

Most of the active regions in slowly rotating stars such as the Sun have lifetimes shorter than the rotation period. Only long-lived active regions and photospheric faculae give a truly periodic signal in RV series. Episodically, large complexes of activity may last for 5–15 rotation periods (Castenmiller et al. 1986). The associated RV periodicities are generally at the rotation period of the star and its first two or three harmonics (cf. Boisse et al. 2011), while the periodicities induced by r modes would appear at different periods that could be misinterpreted as the periods of orbiting low-mass planets.

Some stars that are targeted for planet search have rotation periods significantly longer than that of the Sun, up to 120–150 days for some low-activity M-type stars (Robertson et al. 2014). These targets may have sectoral modes producing RV oscillations with periods of several tens of days that could be misinterpreted as planets in their habitable zones; these habitable zones are closer to the stars than in the case of the Sun because of the lower stellar luminosities.

As an application, we searched for the orbital periods of “confirmed exoplanets” that have been observed only in radial velocity from exoplanet.eu, excluding transiting exoplanets that are certainly confirmed. We restricted the search to cases where the rotation period of the host star is known. We obtained a (nonexhaustive) list of exoplanets for which the ratio of the orbital period (Porbit) to the stellar rotation period (Prot) can be calculated. Figure 4 shows the ratios in the range from 0 to 1, as well as the planet orbit eccentricities. Highlighted in red are the exoplanets for which the ratio Porbit∕Prot is close to either 0.4 or 0.75, i.e., the ratios expected from the m = 2 and m =3 sectoral r modes (see Henry et al. 2000; Fischer et al. 2001; Meyer et al. 2006; Simpson et al. 2010; Bonfils et al. 2013; Anglada-Escudé et al. 2013; Wittenmyer et al. 2014; Suárez Mascareño et al. 2015, 2016; Hinkel et al. 2015; Bourrier et al. 2018). Large eccentricities correspond to RV signals that are not sinusoidal, unlike r-mode linear oscillations that are expected to be sinusoidal. Since HD 38529 b has an eccentricity of 0.248, it is unlikely to be an r-mode false positive. We note that GJ 163, HD 130322, and GJ 667 C were observed in RV over short periods, typically less than 1000 days (corresponding to 9–13 stellar rotations); these are perhaps the most likely candidates for r-mode oscillations since r modes may remain coherent over such periods of observation. The signals for GJ 163 c, GJ 832 c, and GJ 667 C f have RV semi-amplitudes of 3 m s−1 or below, while HD 130322 b and 55 Cnc b have RV semi-amplitudes of 112 and 71 m s−1, which is far above the solar r mode amplitudes.

The amplitude of the RV variations associated with active regions are on the order of several m s−1 in the Sun and slowly rotating stars (e.g., Haywood et al. 2016; Lanza et al. 2016, 2018). Several methods have been developed to correct for such activity-induced variations based on different techniques and correlations with activity indicators (e.g., Dumusque et al. 2017). In the best cases, they can be applied to uncover Keplerian signals with amplitudes of several tens of cm s−1 in long time series of late-type stars with very low levels of activity (and convective noise, e.g., Dumusque et al. 2012). It is precisely in the 10 cm s−1 regime, which is becoming accessible thanks to the increasing stability and accuracy of stellar speedometers such as HARPS and ESPRESSO, that solar-like r modes could become a source of false detections. They can be identified by their characteristic frequencies provided that the stellar rotation period is known. We note that the relationship between r-mode amplitudes and activity-cycle phase is not straightforward for the Sun (Z.-C. Liang, priv. comm.). Present methods to correct for the effects of stellar activity in RV time series are not yet advanced enough to reach the precision of 10 cm s−1, thus makingit even more important to understand all the sources of RV variations at that level, including the effects of the r modes.

A solar telescope has been built to feed the high-accuracy spectrograph HARPS-N to make measurements of the solar RV from its spectrum integrated over the solar disk. The system collects up to ~ 40–60 measurements per clear day, reaching a precision of ~ 35–40 cm s−1 on a single measurement (Dumusque et al. 2015; Phillips et al. 2016). A preview of the results has been published by Mortier & Collier Cameron (2017). In the lower panel of their Fig. 2, the stacked periodogram of a series of measurements covering approximately 300 days shows signals with synodic periods around 19 and 9 days, which are rather close to the expected periods of the m = 2 and m = 3 sectoral r modes. If these oscillation periods are indeed due to r modes, then they should also be present in the BiSON and GOLF/SOHO disk-integrated velocity observations covering multiple decades (at least at times when B0≠0), and in other spatially resolved Doppler observations. Furthermore, we conjecture that r modes may affect the RV of the Sun or late-type stars also in an indirect way, namely by modifying the distribution of the surface magnetic fields through their velocity field because magnetic flux tubes are frozen to the photospheric plasma. We expect the magnetic fields to be concentrated in regions of higher vorticity (e.g., Balmaceda et al. 2010), thus producing a local quenching of the convective spectral line blueshifts that can lead to a perturbation of the disk-integrated RV (e.g., Meunier et al. 2010) with the temporal and spatial periodicities of the underlying r modes.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Ratiosof exoplanet orbital periods (Porbit) to the rotation periods of their host stars (Prot) for exoplanets that have been observed in radial velocity only. The exoplanet orbit eccentricity is given on the vertical axis. The dashed lines indicate the expected ratios Porbit ∕Prot for the m = 2 and m = 3 sectoral r modes of stellar oscillations. Exoplanets with ratios close to these values are potential false positives and are labeled with the number listed in the top table and plotted in red with error bars.

6. Conclusions

The recent discovery of r modes in the Sun by Löptien et al. (2018) prompted this investigation of their possible signature in the RV measurements of Sun-like and late-type stars, including those that are targets for exoplanet search by means of the radial velocity technique.

Under reasonable assumptions, we find that the lowest-m r modes may produce disk-integrated RV oscillations with amplitudes up to several tens of cm s−1. Their periods are comparable with the stellar rotation period, but different from it and its harmonics, unlike the modulations produced by stellar activity. False planetary detections produced by r-mode oscillations, if any, should be identifiable provided that the rotation period of the star is known. We expect putative orbital periods on the order of 10–20 days and amplitudes corresponding to masses of 0.1–0.2 Earth masses, if we consider the low-amplitude r modes excited in the Sun. However, larger amplitudes could be possible in other stars that might put into question some of the candidates recently proposed around some M dwarfs (see Sect. 5).

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the anonymous referee for a careful reading of their manuscript and for the valuable comments. They gratefully acknowledge support from the International Space Science Institute in Bern in whose premises this work was initiated in July 2018. A.F.L. acknowledges support from the Italian Ministry’s Progetti Premiali to INAF (Premiale Frontiera). T.V.Z. was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project 30695-N27 and by Georgian Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation project 217146. L.G. acknowledges support from the Max Planck Society through a grant on PLATO science. K.R. is a member of the International Max Planck Research School for Solar System Science at the University of Göttingen. K.R. contributed to the discussion section, especially Fig. 4.

References

  1. Affer, L., Micela, G., Damasso, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anglada-Escudé, G., & Butler, R. P. 2012, ApJS, 200, 15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anglada-Escudé, G., Tuomi, M., Gerlach, E., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A126 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Astudillo-Defru, N., Forveille, T., Bonfils, X., et al. 2017, A&A, 602, A88 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Balmaceda, L., Vargas Domínguez, S., Palacios, J., Cabello, I., & Domingo, V. 2010, A&A, 513, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baranne, A., Queloz, D., Mayor, M., et al. 1996, A&AS, 119, 373 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boisse, I., Bouchy, F., Hébrard, G., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonfils, X., Lo Curto, G., Correia, A. C. M., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A110 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourrier, V., Dumusque, X., Dorn, C., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castenmiller, M. J. M., Zwaan, C., & van der Zalm, E. B. J. 1986, Sol. Phys., 105, 237 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collier Cameron, A., Davidson, V. A., Hebb, L., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 451 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cosentino, R., Lovis, C., Pepe, F., et al. 2012, Proc. SPIE, 8446, 84461V [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Diaz-Cordoves, J., Claret, A., & Gimenez, A. 1995, A&AS, 110, 329 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dumusque, X., Udry, S., Lovis, C., Santos, N. C., & Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G. 2011, A&A, 525, A140 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dumusque, X., Pepe, F., Lovis, C., et al. 2012, Nature, 491, 207 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dumusque, X., Boisse, I., & Santos, N. C. 2014, ApJ, 796, 132 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dumusque, X., Glenday, A., Phillips, D. F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, L21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dumusque, X., Borsa, F., Damasso, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A133 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer, D. A., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 551, 1107 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Galland, F., Lagrange, A.-M., Udry, S., et al. 2005, A&A, 443, 337 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hanasoge, S., & Mandal, K. 2019, ApJ, 871, L32 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haywood, R. D., Collier Cameron, A., Unruh, Y. C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Henry, G. W., Baliunas, S. L., Donahue, R. A., Fekel, F. C., & Soon, W. 2000, ApJ, 531, 415 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hinkel, N. R., Kane, S. R., Henry, G. W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kepler, S. O. 1984, ApJ, 286, 314 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lanza, A. F., Boisse, I., Bouchy, F., Bonomo, A. S., & Moutou, C. 2011, A&A, 533, A44 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lanza, A. F., Molaro, P., Monaco, L., & Haywood, R. D. 2016, A&A, 587, A103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lanza, A. F., Malavolta, L., Benatti, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liang, Z.-C., Gizon, L., Birch, A. C., & Duvall, Jr., T. L. 2018, A&A, submitted [arXiv:1812.07413] [Google Scholar]
  30. Löptien, B., Birch, A. C., Duvall, Jr., T. L., Gizon, L., & Schou, J. 2016, A&A, 590, A130 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Löptien, B., Gizon, L., Birch, A. C., et al. 2018, Nat. Astron., 2, 568 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lovis, C., Dumusque, X., Santos, N. C., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1107.5325] [Google Scholar]
  33. Makarov, V. V. 2010, ApJ, 715, 500 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayor, M., Lovis, C., & Santos, N. C. 2014, Nature, 513, 328 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Meunier, N., Desort, M., & Lagrange, A.-M. 2010, A&A, 512, A39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Meyer, M. R., Hillenbrand, L. A., Backman, D., et al. 2006, PASP, 118, 1690 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mortier, A., & Collier Cameron A. 2017, A&A, 601, A110 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ogilvie, G. I. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 171 [Google Scholar]
  40. Papaloizou, J., & Pringle, J. E. 1978, MNRAS, 182, 423 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pepe, F., Molaro, P., Cristiani, S., et al. 2014, Astron. Nachr., 335, 8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Phillips, D. F., Glenday, A. G., Dumusque, X., et al. 2016, Proc. SPIE, 9912, 99126Z [Google Scholar]
  43. Provost, J., Berthomieu, G., & Rocca, A. 1981, A&A, 94, 126 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reinhold, T., & Gizon, L. 2015, A&A, 583, A65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. Robertson, P., Mahadevan, S., Endl, M., & Roy, A. 2014, Science, 345, 440 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Saar, S. H., & Donahue, R. A. 1997, ApJ, 485, 319 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saio, H. 1982, ApJ, 256, 717 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Saio, H., Kurtz, D. W., Murphy, S. J., Antoci, V. L., & Lee, U. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 2774 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Santos, N. C., Mortier, A., Faria, J. P., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  50. Simpson, E. K., Baliunas, S. L., Henry, G. W., & Watson, C. A. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 1666 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Suárez Mascareño, A., Rebolo, R., González Hernández, J. I., & Esposito, M. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2745 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Suárez Mascareño, A., Rebolo, R., & González Hernández, J. I. 2016, A&A, 595, A12 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Reeth, T., Tkachenko, A., & Aerts, C. 2016, A&A, 593, A120 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wittenmyer, R. A., Tuomi, M., Butler, R. P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wright, J. T. 2017, Handbook of Exoplanets, eds. H. J. Deeg, & J. A. Belmonte, Springer Living Reference Work (London: Springer), 4 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wolff, C. L. 1998, ApJ, 502, 961 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wolff, C. L., & Blizard, J. B. 1986, Sol. Phys., 105, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zechmeister, M., & Kürster, M. 2009, A&A, 496, 577 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Peak-to-peak amplitudes A0 and sidereal oscillation periods of the RV variations produced by sectoral r modes in a Sun-like star inclined by i = 30° and i = 60°.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Top panel: simulated RV variations of a Sun-like star produced by individual r modes, as seen by a distant observer, as a function of the time. The spin axis of the star has an inclination of i = 60° to the line of sight. Different line styles refer to different sectoral modes: the solid line is for m = 2 mode, the dotted line for m = 3, the dashed line for m = 4, and the dash-dotted line for m = 5. See Table 1 for the amplitude, the period, and the rms radial vorticity of each mode. Bottom panel: line-of-sight velocity on the disk for m = 2 at the four different phases a–d indicated by circles in the top panel. The color scale saturates at ± 2 m s−1: blue is toward and red is away from the observer. The plus symbols indicate the north pole and the black lines the equator.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Top panel: periodogram of the simulated radial velocity time series of a Sun-like star showing sectoral r modes with m = 2 and 3 as seen with an inclination i = 60°. The RV amplitudes and the periods of the modes are given in Table 1; they correspond to a maximum horizontal velocity of the modes of 2 m s−1 at the stellar surface. The periodogram is normalized according to the definition of the GLS given by Zechmeister & Kürster (2009). A normally distributed random noise with a standard deviation σn of 10 cm s−1 was added. The vertical dashed line indicates the period of the m = 2 mode and the dotted line that of the m = 3 mode. The red horizontal line gives the level of 1% FAP as determined by analyzing 10 000 random shufflings of the original time series. Bottom panel: same as the top panel, but for a standard deviation of the noise σn of 50 cm s−1. Here the red horizontal line indicates the level corresponding to a FAP of 2%.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Top panel: periodogram of the simulated radial velocity time series of the Sun as a star with sectoral r modes with m = 2 and m = 3 as seen by anEarth observer. The RV maximum amplitude of the m = 2 mode is 24.5 cm s−1, while the amplitude of the m = 3 mode is 7.1 cm s−1; the periods of the modes are given in the text. These RV amplitudes correspond to a maximum horizontal velocity of the modes of 2 ms−1 at the surface of the Sun. The periodogram of a noiseless time series is plotted with a thin blue solid line, while the periodogram obtained adding a normally distributed random noise with a standard deviation σn = 10 cm s−1 is plotted with the thicker green solid line. The vertical dashed line indicates the period of the m = 2 mode and the dotted line that of the m = 3 mode, if the inclination B0 of the solar equator is fixed. The red horizontal line indicates the level of 1% FAP. Bottom panel: same as the top panel, but the maximum RV amplitude of the sectoral m = 2 mode is now assumed to be 8.2 cm s−1, corresponding to the upper limit for the amplitude of this mode found by Liang et al. (2018), while the amplitude of the m = 3 mode is still 7.1 cm s−1. The upper limit for the m = 2 mode corresponds to a maximum horizontal velocity of 0.7 m s−1 at the surface of the Sun.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Ratiosof exoplanet orbital periods (Porbit) to the rotation periods of their host stars (Prot) for exoplanets that have been observed in radial velocity only. The exoplanet orbit eccentricity is given on the vertical axis. The dashed lines indicate the expected ratios Porbit ∕Prot for the m = 2 and m = 3 sectoral r modes of stellar oscillations. Exoplanets with ratios close to these values are potential false positives and are labeled with the number listed in the top table and plotted in red with error bars.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.