EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 589 (May 2016) A&A, 589 (2016) A17 Full HTML
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 589, May 2016
Article Number A17
Number of page(s) 8
Section Stellar atmospheres
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527912
Published online 06 April 2016

© ESO, 2016

1. Introduction

Cayrel de Strobel (1996) defined a solar twin as a star very similar to the Sun within the observational errors, in different properties such as mass, chemical composition, age, effective temperature, luminosity, surface gravity, chromospheric activity, equatorial rotation, etc. The first four stars reported as solar twins were 18 Sco (Porto de Mello & da Silva 1997), HIP 78399 (King et al. 2005), HD 98618 (Meléndez et al. 2006), and HIP 100963 (Takeda et al. 2007). Ramírez et al. (2009) suggested a new definition: a star is a solar twin if its stellar parameters fall into the range of ΔTeff = 100 K, Δlog g = 0.1 dex, and Δ[Fe/H] = 0.1 dex, relative to the Sun. With this new constraint as definition, there are about 100 solar twins known up to now (Meléndez & Ramírez 2007; Meléndez et al. 2009, 2012, 2014b; Pasquini et al. 2008; Petit et al. 2008; Ramírez et al. 2009, 2014; Takeda & Tajitsu 2009; Baumann et al. 2010; Önehag et al. 2011; Datson et al. 2012; do Nascimento et al. 2013; Porto de Mello et al. 2014; Mahdi et al. 2016).

Table 1

Comparison of stellar parameters of HIP 100963.

HIP 100963 was one of the 118 solar analogs1 observed by Takeda et al. (2007). The authors determined its stellar parameters, rotational velocity, Li abundance, luminosity, mass, and age. These last two parameters were computed by comparing the position of the luminosity (L) and effective temperature (Teff) on the theoretical Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Their first results suggested that HIP 100963 has an age of ~5 Gyr with similar stellar parameters as the Sun. Later, Takeda & Tajitsu (2009) obtained the stellar parameters for HIP 100963 with greater precision. Their results show somewhat higher effective temperature (+ 40 K) and higher Li abundance (+ 0.7 dex) than the Sun. The authors also analyzed the Be II lines (3130.42 Å and 3131.07 Å) and concluded that the Be abundance of HIP 100963 is presumably solar within 0.1 dex2. Do Nascimento et al. (2009) determined the age and mass of HIP 100963 employing the Toulouse-Geneva stellar evolution code (Hui-Bon-Hoa 2008). They used the stellar parameters found by Takeda et al. (2007) and Takeda & Tajitsu (2009). Their results agree with the mass derived by Takeda et al. (2007), but the age is 3 Gyr, which is younger than the value found by Takeda et al. (2007) using less precise stellar parameters. Using chromospheric activity, an even younger age (1.7 Gyr) has been suggested (Isaacson & Fischer 2010).

In recent works based on spectroscopy of solar-type superflare stars, Notsu et al. (2015a) carried out high-dispersion spectroscopic observations for a sample of 50 solar-type stars and 8 solar twins (among them HIP 100963). They determined the stellar parameters of HIP 100963 (see Table 1) following the method by Takeda et al. (2005). The rotational velocity, chromospheric activity (Notsu et al. 2015b), and Li abundance (Honda et al. 2015) were also studied.

Ramírez et al. (2009) analyzed the spectra of 64 solar-type stars (HIP 100963 among the sample), finding a correlation between the differential abundances relative to the Sun and the condensation temperature. Meléndez et al. (2009) suggested that this deficiency in refractory elements could be explained by rocky planet formation. Chambers (2010) has reproduced such abundance behavior by adding a mixture of 4 M⊕ of Earth-like material and carbonaceous-chondrite-like material into the convection zone of the Sun. In addition to the planet signatures, the Galactic chemical evolution (GCE) can have a strong impact on the abundance pattern (e.g., Adibekyan et al. 2014; Nissen 2015; Spina et al. 2016), as most elements show [X/Fe] ratios that depend on age. Therefore, it is important to continue to identify more solar twins and to conduct high-precision chemical abundance analyses to better understand the relative contributions of the GCE and planetary signatures to be able to distinguish these effects.

thumbnail Fig. 1

HIRES spectra of HIP 100963 (blue circles) and the Sun (red line) in the 5400–5410 Å region. Residuals between the Sun and HIP 100963 (Sun – HIP) are shown in the lower panel.
Open with DEXTER

In the present work, we determine the stellar parameters of HIP 100963 with high precision to obtain its mass and age, and clarify its evolutionary status in this way. We also derive precise chemical abundances of 27 elements and investigate how the possible presence of planets, stellar evolution, and the GCE can explain the abundance pattern of this solar twin.

2. Observations and data reduction

Spectra of HIP 100963 and the Sun (reflected light from the Iris asteroid) were obtained using the HIRES spectrograph (Vogt et al. 1994) at the Keck I telescope, covering the wavelength region from 3940–8350 Å, in a mosaic of three CCDs optimized for the blue, green, and red regions. Observations were performed on August 13, 2013, with exposure times of 180 s for HIP 100963 and 720 s for Iris. The slit width was set to 0.57 arcsec, giving a spectral resolving power of R = λ/ Δλ = 70 000 (3.2 pixels per resolution element); the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) at ~6000 Å measured for HIP 100963 is about 400 pixel-1, while for the Sun it is about 650 pixel-1.

The spectra were reduced using the MAKEE3 pipeline following the standard procedure: bias subtraction, flat fielding, sky subtraction, order extraction, and wavelength calibration. MAKEE performs the heliocentric correction for wavelength. Radial velocity and the rest frame correction were performed using the rvidlines and dopcor tasks in IRAF. The continuum-normalization was performed using the continuum task in IRAF4. Part of the reduced spectra of HIP 100963 and the Iris asteroid is shown in Fig. 1.

3. Abundance analysis

3.1. Stellar parameters

The analysis is based on the line-by-line differential method (e.g., Meléndez et al. 2012, 2014a; Monroe et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2014; Ramírez et al. 2014; Biazzo et al. 2015; Nissen 2015; Spina et al. 2016; Saffe et al. 2015). We measured the EWs using the splot task in IRAF, fitting the line profiles using Gaussians. Pseudo-continuum regions were obtained following Bedell et al. (2014) in a window of 6 Å.

To calculate the stellar parameters and chemical abundances, we used the Kurucz ODFNEW model atmospheres (Castelli & Kurucz 2004) and the 2014 version of the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) code MOOG (Sneden 1973). We determined the elemental abundances of the Sun assuming the standard solar parameters: Teff = 5777 K, log g = 4.44 dex (Cox 2000) and vt = 1.00 km s-1, as in Ramírez et al. (2014). We employed the differential spectroscopic equilibrium5 for HIP 100963 relative to the Sun (see Fig. 2), giving as a result the following stellar parameters: Teff = 5818 K, log g = 4.49 dex, vt = 1.03 km s-1, and [Fe/H] =−0.003 dex. The stellar parameter errors were determined as in Epstein et al. (2010) and Bensby et al. (2014); these errors consist of observational uncertainties and the degeneracies in the stellar parameters. We have achieved the highest precision ever obtained in stellar parameters for this object: σ(Teff) = 4 K, σ(log g) = 0.012 dex, σ(vt) = 0.01 km s-1, and σ( [ Fe/H ] ) = 0.004 dex.

In Table 1 we compare our stellar parameters with previous studies. They all agree within the errors.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Differential abundance of HIP 100963 relative to the Sun as a function of excitation potential (top panel) and reduced equivalent width (bottom panel). The blue filled circles represent Fe I, the green filled squares Fe II. The red solid lines in both panels are linear fits to Fe I.

Open with DEXTER

3.2. Age and mass

Meléndez et al. (2012) and Nissen (2015) have shown that it is possible to estimate reliable ages of solar-like stars using the isochrone technique (e.g., Lachaume et al. 1999). This was made possible by the extremely precise measurements of the stellar parameters and in particular using an accurate log g instead of an uncertain absolute magnitude (Mv) as input parameters. Taking into account the considerations above, Ramírez et al. (2014) developed a python code named q2(qoyllur-quipu)6, which computes the mass, age, luminosity, and radius. To calculate the age, the q2 code uses the isochrone method, adopting a fine grid of Yonsei-Yale isochrones (e.g., Yi et al. 2001). Our results are listed in Table 2. The age we determine (2.0 ± 0.4 Gyr)7 is also consistent with the high-level activity of this star, which has an average activity indicator of log R′HK = −4.74 (σ = 0.11), according to Wright et al. (2004), White et al. (2007), and Isaacson & Fischer (2010). We used seven individual log R′HK measurements available in the references above and the color (B − V) = 0.651 (Ramírez et al. 2012) to determine chromospheric ages from the chromospheric activity indicator log R′HK. Following the relations given in Wright et al. (2004) and Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008), we find mean ages of 2.3 ± 0.4 Gyr and 2.6 ± 0.6 Gyr, respectively, and a weighted average of 2.4 ± 0.3 Gyr. This value agrees well with our isochronal age.

Table 2

Fundamental parameters.

Table 3

Stellar abundances [X/H] of HIP 100963 relative to the Sun and corresponding errors.

3.3. Abundance trends

We measured high-precision chemical abundances of 26 elements other than Li using EWs: C, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Sm, and Eu relative to the Sun. We adopted the hyperfine structure data used by Meléndez et al. (2014a) for V, Mn, Co, Cu, Y, Ba, La, and Eu, with isotopic fractions as given in Asplund et al. (2009), McWilliam (1998), and Cohen et al. (2003) for Cu, Ba, and Eu, respectively.

Non-local thermal equilibrium (NLTE) effects in solar twins are negligible (Meléndez et al. 2012; Monroe et al. 2013), but might be important for the O I triplet. Therefore we applied differential NLTE corrections for O using the NLTE grid of Ramírez et al. (2007). Recent oxygen NLTE calculations (Amarsi et al. 2016) predict quite different absolute NLTE corrections than those from Ramírez et al. (2007), but for our work the effect is negligible because all the calculations are strictly differential. Adopting the grid of Amarsi et al. (2016) would result in a differential abundance lower by only 0.004 dex.

In Table 3 we show our differential abundances relative to the Sun, including observational, systematic, and the total error (obtained from quadratically adding the statistical and systematic errors). Our results agree with the abundances calculated by Ramírez et al. (2009), as shown in Fig. 3, but our results are more precise because of the better quality of the data. The mean difference is Δ [X/H] (Ramírez et al. 2009; this work) = 0.011 (σ = 0.016 dex).

Nissen (2015) conducted a similar high-precision chemical abundance analysis of 21 solar twins to investigate abundance trends with age and dust condensation temperature. He found that the [Y/Mg] ratio was correlated with age, so that this abundance ratio offers an independent age indicator. Using his relation, we estimate the age of HIP 100963 as 2.1 ± 0.4 Gyr, in agreement with the isochronal age computed by using q2 and with the age estimated from a chromospheric diagnostics.

4. Discussion

4.1. Light elements (Z ≤ 30)

The abundance pattern of HIP 100963 relative to the Sun is shown in Fig. 4 (blue filled circles in the upper panel). The fit of their light elements (Z ≤ 30) gives a positive slope with an average dispersion of 0.019 dex, which is higher than the average error bar (0.008 dex). This might be due to the scatter introduced by the GCE.

A correlation between Tcond trend and age was first observed by Ramírez et al. (2014). Adibekyan et al. (2014) also showed a correlation between the abundance trends versus condensation temperature and stellar ages. They analyzed a sample of 148 solar-like stars and observed that young stars are richer in refractories than old stars. They suggested that this behavior is due to the chemical evolution of the Galactic thin disk. Later, Nissen (2015) and Spina et al. (2016) confirmed this correlation and concluded that the Tcond-slope decreases with increasing stellar age.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Comparison between our abundance pattern and that by Ramírez et al. (2009) as a function of condensation temperature, Tcond (Lodders 2003).
Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 4

Upper panel: observed differential abundances relative to the Sun versus condensation temperature. Lower panel: abundance trend after correcting for the GCE to the solar age. Linear fits to the data (excluding the neutron-capture elements) are overplotted in each panel as a green solid line. Neutron-capture elements are represented by gray filled squares. Sigma represents the dispersion about the linear fit.
Open with DEXTER

We employed the [X/Fe]-age relation of Spina et al. (2016) to correct for the GCE for elements with Z ≤ 30. As HIP 100963 is younger than the Sun, we added the effect of the GCE to its elemental abundances because our differential abundances are relative to the present-day Sun. This yields (1)where b is the slope found by Spina et al. (2016)8. In Fig. 4 (lower panel) we show the elemental abundance differences ([ X/H ] GCE) adding the GCE effect between HIP 100963 and the Sun (red filled circles) as a function of condensation temperature (Lodders 2003). We did not correct for the n-capture elements (gray squares) because Spina et al. (2016) did not include most of these elements. The average dispersion from the fit is 0.016 dex, in agreement with the average error bar (0.015 dex), which now includes the uncertainty in the GCE correction (also including the error in age). Besides that, the decrease to 1.7 from the initial value of 8.5. Within the errors the abundance pattern of HIP 100963 corrected by GCE (to the solar age) is similar to the Sun, or perhaps slightly more depleted in refractories than the Sun. Notice that the slope changed from 2.8 to –1.7, and that the difference is significant at the ~2 sigma level, i.e., the contribution of GCE is important.

Meléndez et al. (2009) were the first to find that the Sun is deficient in refractories when compared to the average abundance of 11 solar twins. They argued that the peculiar solar abundance pattern is a mirror image of the abundance pattern of meteorites and inner rocky planets in our solar system. This suggests that the refractory-poor solar pattern may be linked to the formation of terrestrial planets in the solar system. If the Meléndez et al. (2009) scenario is correct, the solar pattern of HIP 100963 means that it may have formed rocky planets.

HIP 100963 is included in the California Planet Search (Isaacson & Fischer 2010), but no planet has been detected yet. Only a few data points have been reported so far, however.

4.2. Neutron capture elements (Z > 30)

As can be seen in Fig. 4, HIP 100963 presents significant enhancements in neutron-capture elements (gray squares) from the s- and r-process. For the solar twin 18 Sco, Meléndez et al. (2014a) argued that these enhancements might be due to pollution from asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars and r-process sources, which enrich the interstellar medium over time. Although massive stars dominate the production of the lighter s-process elements (Sr, Y, and Zr) at low metallicites, at solar metallicity the production of these elements is dominated by AGB stars (Bisterzo et al. 2014). We here followed the procedure adopted by Meléndez et al. (2014a) for the solar twin 18 Sco. Assuming that the observed enhancements are due to the pollution from AGB stars, we fit the lighter elements [ X/H ] Z ≤ 30 to subtract the trend with condensation temperature from heavy elements [ X/H ] Z > 30, (2)where [ X/H ] Tcond represents the abundance of neutron-capture elements corrected for the condensation temperature effect, whereas the last two terms come from the fit of the lighter abundances trend versus condensation temperature without GCE (see Fig. 4). To compute the amount of pollution of the protocloud by an AGB star ([ X/H ] AGB), we used the same model as adopted by Meléndez et al. (2014a)9, with diluted yields of a small fraction of AGB ejecta into a protocloud of solar composition of 1 M⊙ (Asplund et al. 2009). We estimate a dilution of 0.34% mass of AGB material to match the average observed enhancements in the s-process elements (Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, and Ce). The two abundances [ X/H ] Tcond and [ X/H ] AGB are given in Table 4. Figure 5 shows that the s-process elements Y, Ba, La, and Ce are well reproduced, but the r-process elements (Sm and Eu) are not. Therefore, the AGB contribution alone cannot explain the heavy abundance enhancement. Another source of enhancement is the contribution from the r-process. To determine this enrichment, we first subtracted the AGB contribution from the heavy elements, (3)Then we compared these ratios with the predicted enhancements based on the r-process in the solar system (Simmerer et al. 2004; Bisterzo et al. 2014). Meléndez et al. (2014a) determined the r-process contribution, which is given by (4)where Δτ is the average of the two most enhanced s-process and r-process elements (Δτ = 0.091 dex), and rSS is the r-process fraction in the solar system. In Fig. 6 we show our results, which agree reasonably well with the predicted r-process in the solar system (Simmerer et al. 2004; Bisterzo et al. 2014). Even for elements that are partially produced through the contribution of r-process (e.g., Nd), we obtain agreement within the error. Our results, together with that obtained for 18 Sco (Meléndez et al. 2014a), suggest an enhanced contribution of r- and s-process elements in young stars. Our results are also supported by D’Orazi et al. (2009), Maiorca et al. (2011), and D’Orazi et al. (2012), who showed that younger objects exhibit s-process enhancements in open clusters.

Table 4

Enhancement of neutron-capture elemental abundances and their decomposition in HIP 100963.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Comparison of the [ X/H ] Tcond (red filled circles) ratios with predicted abundances from the AGB pollution (open hexagons).
Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 6

Residual enhancement [ X/H ] r − process due to the contribution of the r-process. Predicted enhancement by Bisterzo et al. (2014) and Simmerer et al. (2004) are also plotted as solid and dashed lines, respectively.
Open with DEXTER

4.3. Lithium abundance

Previous works suggest a strong connection between lithium abundance and stellar age (Soderblom 1983; Charbonnel & Talon 2005; Denissenkov 2010; Baumann et al. 2010; Monroe et al. 2013; Meléndez et al. 2014b) based on findings that showed younger stars to have large Li abundances. To determine whether HIP 10093 follows this relation, we estimated the lithium abundance following the procedure explained in Meléndez et al. (2012), which consists of first estimating the line broadening and then performing spectral synthesis of the Li feature. We computed the stellar macroturbulence velocity (Tucci Maia et al. 2015) through the relation (5)We fixed vsini⊙ = 1.9 km s-1 (Bruning 1984; Saar & Osten 1997) and obtained by spectral synthesis of six lines (see below) vmacro, ⊙ = 3.34 km s-1, which was employed in Eq. (5) to estimate the vmacro of HIP 100963, which in turn yielded =3.43 km s-1. Then the projected rotational velocity (vsini) was measured by fitting the line profiles of five iron lines: 6027.050 Å,6093.644 Å,6151.618 Å,6165.360 Å,6705.102 Å, and one Ni I line at 6767.772 Å. We found vsini = 1.93 ± 0.21 km s-1, similar to what was determined by Takeda & Tajitsu (2009; vsini = 2.04 km s-1; no error bar was given), and in good agreement with the value 1.9 ± 0.3 km s-1 of Honda et al. (2015)10.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Spectral synthesis of the Li doublet at 6708 A. Open and filled circles represent the spectra of HIP 100963 and the Sun, respectively, while the synthetic spectrum is overplotted as a red solid line.
Open with DEXTER

HIP 100963 (blue open circles) presents a deeper Li feature in Fig. 7 than that in the Sun (black filled circles). Based on the vmacro and vsini we determined above, we performed the spectral synthesis of the Li line adopting the line list of Meléndez et al. (2012) and using the synth driver in MOOG. This yielded an LTE abundance of 1.67 dex. The lithium abundance in NLTE is 1.70 ± 0.03; it was obtained by using the NLTE corrections of Lind et al. (2009)11. The A(Li) uncertainties were obtained taking into consideration errors due to S/N, continuum setting, and stellar parameters. The quadratic sum of the three uncertainty sources gives an error of 0.03 dex. Our result closely agrees with the Li abundance12 of 1.72 dex and 1.7 dex determined by Takeda et al. (2007) and Honda et al. (2015), respectively.

Meléndez et al. (2012) analyzed the Li-age correlation using the Sun and two solar twins (18 Sco and HIP 56948). They concluded that lithium decays with age. Additional works (Ramírez et al. 2011; Monroe et al. 2013; Meléndez et al. 2014b) confirmed their results (see also Baumann et al. 2010). Figure 8 shows that HIP 100963 follows the Li-age correlation of previous works, extending the result to stellar ages younger than the Sun. We also compared our findings with non-standard Li depletion models developed for the Sun (Charbonnel & Talon 2005; Do Nascimento et al. 2009; Xiong & Deng 2009; Denissenkov 2010; Andrássy & Spruit 2015). As can be seen, the agreement is very good. These previous models include transport mechanisms that are not considered in the standard solar model.

thumbnail Fig. 8

Li vs. age for HIP 100963 (red filled square) based on NLTE analysis and isochronal age. The Li abundance for other stars analyzed by our group in previous works (Ramírez et al. 2011; Meléndez et al. 2012, 2014a; Monroe et al. 2013) is shown with blue filled circles. The lithium abundance errors are smaller than the size of the circles. Li depletion models are also shown with different lines.
Open with DEXTER

5. Conclusions

We have performed a high-precision differential study of the solar twin candidate HIP 100963 based on Keck+HIRES spectra. The atmospheric parameters that we found are Teff = 5818 ± 4 K, log g = 4.49 ± 0.01 dex, vt = 1.03 ± 0.01 km s-1, and [Fe/H] = −0.003 ± 0.004 dex. While these values agree with previous studies, we have achieved considerably higher accuracy and confirm that HIP 100963 is a solar twin.

We obtained a precise mass and age (M⊙, 2.0 ± 0.4 Gyr) that both agree with the values reported in the literature. The abundance trend with Tcond before the GCE correction is comparable with the enhancement of refractories seen in other solar twins, but considering corrections for the GCE to the same age as the Sun, the abundance pattern is about solar. This means that this star may have formed rocky planets. The abundances of the s- and r-process elements are enhanced relative to the Sun. This is most likely because HIP 100963 is younger than the Sun.

Finally, the lithium abundance of HIP 100963 falls within the correlation between Li and age suggested in the literature, extending the age coverage that can be used to test models of Li depletion to relatively young ages.

1

Solar analogs are stars with temperatures and metallicities within ~500 K and 0.3 dex of the Sun.

2

No Be abundances were given, only a comparison of observed and synthetic spectra was made.

3

MAKEE was developed by T. Barlow to reduce Keck HIRES spectra. It is accessible at www.astro.caltech.edu/~tb/

4

IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of the Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.

5

Spectroscopic equilibrium is achieved when the differential excitation, ionization balance, and no dependence of differential iron abundance with reduced equivalent width (EW/λ) are reached.

6

Qoyllur-quipu is a free code based on python, and it is available at https://github.com/astroChasqui/q2

7

The probability distribution functions indicate another solution with age younger than 1 Gyr, but this solution was discarded because all other age indicators favor the solution around 2 Gyr.

8

Spina et al. (2016) performed a linear fit ([X/Fe] = age ×b + a) with their parameters listed in Table 3 of their work. The fits are used to correct for the GCE as a function of age, but do not take possible inhomogeneous GCE effects into account.

9

This is an AGB stellar model with 3 M⊙ as initial mass, and Z = 0.01 of metallicity (Karakas et al. 2010; Meléndez et al. 2014a).

10

The value found by Honda et al. (2015) for HIP 100963 is 2.4 ± 0.3 km s-1, with vsini⊙ = 2.4 km s-1. Thus, the result relative to the Sun is Δvsini = 0.0 km  s-1. The same is true for Takeda & Tajitsu (2009), where vsini⊙ = 2.13 km s-1 and vsini = 2.27 km s-1 for HIP 100963.

11

INSPECT database available at www.inspect-stars.com

12

No error bars were given by Takeda et al. (2007) and Honda et al. (2015).

Acknowledgments

J.Y.G. acknowledges support by CNPq. J.M thanks for support from FAPESP (2012/24392-2). We are grateful to the many people who have worked to make the Keck telescope and its instruments a reality and to operate and maintain the Keck Observatory. The authors wish to extend special thanks to those of Hawaian ancestry on whose sacred mountain we are privileged to be guests. Without their generous hospitality, none of the observations presented herein would have been possible. D.Y., F.L., M.A. and A.K. gratefully acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (grants DP120100991, FL110100012, FT140100554, DP150100250 and FT110100475).

References

  1. Adibekyan, V. Z., González Hernández, J. I., DelgadoMena, E., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, L15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amarsi, A. M., Asplund, M., Collet, R., & Leenaarts, J. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 3735 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrássy, R., & Spruit, H. C. 2015, A&A, 579, A122 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumann, P., Ramírez, I., Meléndez, J., Asplund, M., & Lind, K. 2010, A&A, 519, A87 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bedell, M., Meléndez, J., Bean, J. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 23 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Oey, M. S. 2014, A&A, 562, A71 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Biazzo, K., Gratton, R., Desidera, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A135 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bisterzo, S., Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Wiescher, M., & Käppeler, F. 2014, ApJ, 787, 10 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruning, D. H. 1984, ApJ, 281, 830 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Castelli, F., & Kurucz, R. L. 2004, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:astro-ph/0405087] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cayrel de Strobel, G. 1996, A&ARv, 7, 243 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chambers, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 724, 92 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Charbonnel, C., & Talon, S. 2005, Science, 309, 2189 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen, J. G., Christlieb, N., Qian, Y.-Z., & Wasserburg, G. J. 2003, ApJ, 588, 1082 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cox, A. N. 2000, Allen’s astrophysical quantities, Sky and Telescopes, 100, 1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Datson, J., Flynn, C., & Portinari, L. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 484 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Denissenkov, P. A. 2010, ApJ, 719, 28 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Do Nascimento, Jr., J. D., Castro, M., Meléndez, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 687 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. do Nascimento, Jr., J.-D., Takeda, Y., Meléndez, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 771, L31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D’Orazi, V., Magrini, L., Randich, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 693, L31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D’Orazi, V., Biazzo, K., Desidera, S., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2789 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Epstein, C. R., Johnson, J. A., Dong, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 447 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Honda, S., Notsu, Y., Maehara, H., et al. 2015, PASJ, 67, 85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hui-Bon-Hoa, A. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Isaacson, H., & Fischer, D. 2010, ApJ, 725, 875 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Karakas, A. I., Campbell, S. W., & Stancliffe, R. J. 2010, ApJ, 713, 374 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. King, J. R., Boesgaard, A. M., & Schuler, S. C. 2005, AJ, 130, 2318 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lachaume, R., Dominik, C., Lanz, T., & Habing, H. J. 1999, A&A, 348, 897 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lind, K., Asplund, M., & Barklem, P. S. 2009, A&A, 503, 541 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, F., Asplund, M., Ramírez, I., Yong, D., & Meléndez, J. 2014, MNRAS, 442, L51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mahdi, D., Soubiran, C., Blanco-Cuaresma, S., & Chemin, L. 2016, A&A, 587, A131 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maiorca, E., Randich, S., Busso, M., Magrini, L., & Palmerini, S. 2011, ApJ, 736, 120 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mamajek, E. E., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1264 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. McWilliam, A. 1998, AJ, 115, 1640 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Meléndez, J., & Ramírez, I. 2007, ApJ, 669, L89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Meléndez, J., Dodds-Eden, K., & Robles, J. A. 2006, ApJ, 641, L133 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Meléndez, J., Asplund, M., Gustafsson, B., & Yong, D. 2009, ApJ, 704, L66 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Meléndez, J., Bergemann, M., Cohen, J. G., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  41. Meléndez, J., Ramírez, I., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2014a, ApJ, 791, 14 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Meléndez, J., Schirbel, L., Monroe, T. R., et al. 2014b, A&A, 567, L3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Monroe, T. R., Meléndez, J., Ramírez, I., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, L32 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nissen, P. E. 2015, A&A, 579, A52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. Notsu, Y., Honda, S., Maehara, H., et al. 2015a, PASJ, 67, 32 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Notsu, Y., Honda, S., Maehara, H., et al. 2015b, PASJ, 67, 33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Önehag, A., Korn, A., Gustafsson, B., Stempels, E., & Vandenberg, D. A. 2011, A&A, 528, A85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pasquini, L., Biazzo, K., Bonifacio, P., Randich, S., & Bedin, L. R. 2008, A&A, 489, 677 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  49. Petit, P., Dintrans, B., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 80 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  50. Porto de Mello, G. F., & da Silva, L. 1997, ApJ, 482, L89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Porto de Mello, G. F., da Silva, R., da Silva, L., & de Nader, R. V. 2014, A&A, 563, A52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ramírez, I., Allen de Prieto, C., & Lambert, D. L. 2007, A&A, 465, 271 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ramírez, I., Meléndez, J., & Asplund, M. 2009, A&A, 508, L17 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ramírez, I., Meléndez, J., Cornejo, D., Roederer, I. U., & Fish, J. R. 2011, ApJ, 740, 76 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ramírez, I., Michel, R., Sefako, R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ramírez, I., Meléndez, J., & Asplund, M. 2014, A&A, 561, A7 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  57. Saar, S. H., & Osten, R. A. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 803 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Saffe, C., Flores, M., & Buccino, A. 2015, A&A, 582, A17 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  59. Siess, L., Dufour, E., & Forestini, M. 2000, A&A, 358, 593 [Google Scholar]
  60. Simmerer, J., Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, 1091 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sneden, C. A. 1973, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin [Google Scholar]
  62. Soderblom, D. R. 1983, ApJS, 53, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Spina, L., Meléndez, J., & Ramírez, I. 2016, A&A, 585, A152 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  64. Takeda, Y., & Tajitsu, A. 2009, PASJ, 61, 471 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  65. Takeda, Y., Hashimoto, O., Taguchi, H., et al. 2005, PASJ, 57, 751 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  66. Takeda, Y., Kawanomoto, S., Honda, S., Ando, H., & Sakurai, T. 2007, A&A, 468, 663 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tucci Maia, M., Meléndez, J., Castro, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, L10 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  68. van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  69. Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., et al. 1994, in Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII, eds. D. L. Crawford, & E. R. Craine, SPIE Conf. Ser., 2198, 362 [Google Scholar]
  70. White, R. J., Gabor, J. M., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2007, AJ, 133, 2524 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. 2004, ApJS, 152, 261 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Xiong, D. R., & Deng, L. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 2013 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yana Galarza, J., Meléndez, J., & Cohen, J. G. 2016, A&A, in press, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527477 [Google Scholar]
  74. Yi, S., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., et al. 2001, ApJS, 136, 417 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Comparison of stellar parameters of HIP 100963.

In the text
Table 2

Fundamental parameters.

In the text
Table 3

Stellar abundances [X/H] of HIP 100963 relative to the Sun and corresponding errors.

In the text
Table 4

Enhancement of neutron-capture elemental abundances and their decomposition in HIP 100963.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

HIRES spectra of HIP 100963 (blue circles) and the Sun (red line) in the 5400–5410 Å region. Residuals between the Sun and HIP 100963 (Sun – HIP) are shown in the lower panel.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Differential abundance of HIP 100963 relative to the Sun as a function of excitation potential (top panel) and reduced equivalent width (bottom panel). The blue filled circles represent Fe I, the green filled squares Fe II. The red solid lines in both panels are linear fits to Fe I.

Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Comparison between our abundance pattern and that by Ramírez et al. (2009) as a function of condensation temperature, Tcond (Lodders 2003).
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Upper panel: observed differential abundances relative to the Sun versus condensation temperature. Lower panel: abundance trend after correcting for the GCE to the solar age. Linear fits to the data (excluding the neutron-capture elements) are overplotted in each panel as a green solid line. Neutron-capture elements are represented by gray filled squares. Sigma represents the dispersion about the linear fit.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Comparison of the [ X/H ] Tcond (red filled circles) ratios with predicted abundances from the AGB pollution (open hexagons).
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Residual enhancement [ X/H ] r − process due to the contribution of the r-process. Predicted enhancement by Bisterzo et al. (2014) and Simmerer et al. (2004) are also plotted as solid and dashed lines, respectively.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Spectral synthesis of the Li doublet at 6708 A. Open and filled circles represent the spectra of HIP 100963 and the Sun, respectively, while the synthetic spectrum is overplotted as a red solid line.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Li vs. age for HIP 100963 (red filled square) based on NLTE analysis and isochronal age. The Li abundance for other stars analyzed by our group in previous works (Ramírez et al. 2011; Meléndez et al. 2012, 2014a; Monroe et al. 2013) is shown with blue filled circles. The lithium abundance errors are smaller than the size of the circles. Li depletion models are also shown with different lines.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.