EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 695 (March 2025) A&A, 695 (2025) A166 References
Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 695, March 2025
Article Number A166
Number of page(s) 25
Section Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451779
Published online 18 March 2025
  1. Adame, A. G., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., et al. 2025, JCAP, 02, 021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akaike, H. 1974, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control., 19, 716 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfano, A. C., Luongo, O., & Muccino, M. 2024, JCAP, 2024, 055 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamba, K., Capozziello, S., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. 2012, Ap&SS, 342, 155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barboza, E., & Alcaniz, J. 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett. B, 666, 415 [Google Scholar]
  6. Basilakos, S., & Plionis, M. 2009, A&A, 507, 47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benaoum, H. B. 2012, Adv. High Energy Phys., 2012, 357802 [Google Scholar]
  8. Benetti, M., & Capozziello, S. 2019, JCAP, 12, 008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bentley, J. L. 1975, Commun. ACM, 18, 509 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bento, M., Bertolami, O., & Sen, A. A. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 043507 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhatia, N. 2010, Int. J. Com. Sci. Inf. Sec., 8, 302 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolstad, W. M. 2009, Understanding Computational Bayesian Statistics (John Wiley& Sons), 644 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Breiman, L. 2001, Mach. Learn., 45, 5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brescia, M., Cavuoti, S., & Longo, G. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3893 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brescia, M., Salvato, M., Cavuoti, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 663 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brockwell, P. J., & Davis, R. A. 2002, Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting (Springer) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G., & Meng, X.-L. 2011, Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (CRC Press) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cai, Y.-F., Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M., & Saridakis, E. N. 2016, Rep. Prog. Phys., 79, 106901 [Google Scholar]
  19. Capozziello, S., & De Laurentis, M. 2011, Phys. Rep., 509, 167 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Capozziello, S., D’Agostino, R., & Luongo, O. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 3924 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Capozziello, S., D’Agostino, R., & Luongo, O. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2576 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Capozziello, S., Dunsby, P. K. S., & Luongo, O. 2021, MNRAS, 509, 5399 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cardone, V. F., Troisi, A., & Capozziello, S. 2004, Phys. Rev. D, 69, 083517 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carloni, Y., Luongo, O., & Muccino, M. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 023512 [Google Scholar]
  25. Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., et al. 2017, J. Stat. Softw., 76, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chevallier, M., & Polarski, D. 2001, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 10, 213 [Google Scholar]
  27. Colgáin, E. Ó., Dainotti, M. G., Capozziello, S., et al. 2024, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2404.08633] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cover, T., & Hart, P. 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 13, 21 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Czerwinska, U. 2020, Push the Limits of Explainability – an Ultimate Guide to SHAP Library, https://urszulaczerwinska.github.io/works/interpretability-shap [Google Scholar]
  30. Demianski, M., Piedipalumbo, E., Rubano, C., & Scudellaro, P. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1396 [Google Scholar]
  31. D’Isanto, A., Cavuoti, S., Brescia, M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3119 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dunsby, P. K., & Luongo, O. 2016, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 13, 1630002 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Escamilla-Rivera, C., & Capozziello, S. 2019, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 28, 1950154 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Escamilla-Rivera, C., Quintero, M. A. C., & Capozziello, S. 2020, JCAP, 2020, 008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fabris, J. C., Velten, H. E. S., Ogouyandjou, C., & Tossa, J. 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett. B, 694, 289 [Google Scholar]
  36. Falk, M., Marohn, F., Michel, R., et al. 2011, A First Course on Time Series Analysis: Examples with SAS (epubli GmbH) [Google Scholar]
  37. Feroz, F., & Hobson, M. P. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 449 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fisher, R. A. 1922, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 222, 309 [Google Scholar]
  39. Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 [Google Scholar]
  40. Friedman, J. H. 2001, Ann. Stat., 29, 1189 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Stat. Sci., 7, 457 [Google Scholar]
  42. Geyer, C. J. 1992, Stat. Sci., 7, 473 [Google Scholar]
  43. Goodman, J., & Weare, J. 2010, Commun. App. Math. Comp. Sci., 5, 65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gregory, P. 2005, Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with Mathematica Support (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Guy, J., Astier, P., Baumont, S., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., et al. 2009, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction (Springer) [Google Scholar]
  47. Heavens, A., Fantaye, Y., Mootoovaloo, A., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1704.03472] [Google Scholar]
  48. Higson, E., Handley, W., Hobson, M., & Lasenby, A. 2018, Bayesian Anal., 13, 873 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Higson, E., Handley, W., Hobson, M., & Lasenby, A. 2019, Stat. Comput., 29, 891 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hogg, D. W., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. 2010, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1008.4686] [Google Scholar]
  51. Huterer, D., & Turner, M. S. 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 64, 123527 [Google Scholar]
  52. Keeton, C. R. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1418 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1412.6980] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kursa, M. B., & Rudnicki, W. R. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1106.5112] [Google Scholar]
  55. Lartillot, N., & Philippe, H. 2006, Syst. Biol., 55, 195 [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, Q. 2019, Shap-shapley, https://github.com/shaoshanglqy/shap-shapley [Google Scholar]
  57. Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. 2002, R News, 2, 18 [Google Scholar]
  58. Linder, E. V. 2008, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 40, 329 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lomb, N. R. 1976, Astrophys. Space Sci., 39, 447 [Google Scholar]
  60. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. 2017, Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst., 30, 4768 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., et al. 2020, Nat. Mach. Intell., 2, 56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Luongo, O., & Muccino, M. 2024, A&A, 690, A40 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  63. MacKay, D. J. 2003, Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
  64. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. 1953, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087 [Google Scholar]
  65. Nami, Y. 2021, Why Does Increasing k Decrease Variance in kNN?, https://towardsdatascience.com/why-does-increasing-k-decrease-variance-in-knn-9ed6de2f5061 [Google Scholar]
  66. Norris, J. R. 1998, Markov Chains (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
  67. Nun, I., Protopapas, P., Sim, B., et al. 2015, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1506.00010] [Google Scholar]
  68. Orchard, L., & Cárdenas, V. H. 2024, Phys. Dark Univ., 46, 101678 [Google Scholar]
  69. Ostriker, J. P., & Vishniac, E. T. 1986, ApJ, 306, L51 [Google Scholar]
  70. Paul, B., & Thakur, P. 2013, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2013, 052 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825 [Google Scholar]
  72. Peebles, P. J. E., & Ratra, B. 2003, Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 559 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 565 [Google Scholar]
  74. Piedipalumbo, E., Vignolo, S., Feola, P., & Capozziello, S. 2023, Phys. Dark Univ., 42, 101274 [Google Scholar]
  75. Plummer, M. 2003, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 124, 1 [Google Scholar]
  76. Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., Earl, N., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Quinlan, J. R. 1986, Mach. Learn., 1, 81 [Google Scholar]
  78. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. 1986, Nature, 323, 533 [Google Scholar]
  79. Sapone, D., & Nesseris, S. 2024, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2412.01740] [Google Scholar]
  80. Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835 [Google Scholar]
  81. Schapire, R. E. 1990, Mach. Learn., 5, 197 [Google Scholar]
  82. Schmidt, B. P., Suntzeff, N. B., Phillips, M., et al. 1998, ApJ, 507, 46 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. Schwarz, G. 1978, Ann. Stat., 6, 461 [Google Scholar]
  84. Scolnic, D., Brout, D., Carr, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 113 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sharma, S. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 213 [Google Scholar]
  86. Skilling, J. 2004, AIP Conf. Proc., 735, 395 [Google Scholar]
  87. Skilling, J. 2006, Bayesian Anal., 1, 833 [Google Scholar]
  88. Speagle, J. S. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3132 [Google Scholar]
  89. Stetson, P. B. 1996, PASP, 108, 851 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  90. Tada, Y., & Terada, T. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, L121305 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  91. Van Der Malsburg, C. 1986, Brain Theory: Proceedings of the First Trieste Meeting on Brain Theory, October 1–4, 1984 (Springer), 245 [Google Scholar]
  92. Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. 2021, Bayesian Anal., 16, 667 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wang, F.-Y., & Dai, Z.-G. 2006, Chin. Astron. Astrophys., 6, 561 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  94. Weinberg, S. 1989, Rev. Mod. Phys., 61, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  95. Weller, J., & Albrecht, A. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 103512 [Google Scholar]
  96. Yang, W., Pan, S., Vagnozzi, S., et al. 2019, JCAP, 11, 044 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.