Issue |
A&A
Volume 695, March 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A166 | |
Number of page(s) | 25 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451779 | |
Published online | 18 March 2025 |
Discriminating between cosmological models using data-driven methods
1
Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Univ. Monte S. Angelo, Via Cinthia 9, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
2
Scuola Superiore Meridionale, Largo S. Marcellino 10, I-80138 Napoli, Italy
3
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sez. di Napoli, Complesso Univ. Monte S. Angelo, Via Cinthia 9, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
4
INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, I-80131 Napoli, Italy
⋆ Corresponding author; capozziello@na.infn.it
Received:
3
August
2024
Accepted:
15
February
2025
Context. This study examines the Pantheon+SH0ES dataset using the standard Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model as a prior and applies machine learning to assess deviations. Rather than assuming discrepancies, we tested the models’ goodness of fit and explored whether the data allow alternative cosmological features.
Aims. The central goal is to evaluate the robustness of the ΛCDM model compared with other dark energy models, and to investigate whether there are deviations that might provide new cosmological insights. This study takes a data-driven approach, using traditional statistical methods and machine learning techniques.
Methods. Initially, we evaluated six dark energy models using traditional statistical methods such as Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) and static or dynamic nested sampling to infer cosmological parameters. We then adopted a machine learning approach, developing a regression model to compute the distance modulus for each supernova and expanding the feature set to 74 statistical features. We used an ensemble of four models: multi-layer perceptron, k-nearest neighbours, random forest regressor, and gradient boosting. Cosmological parameters were estimated in four scenarios using MCMC and nested sampling, while feature selection techniques (random forest, Boruta, and the Shapley additive explanation) were applied in three.
Results. Traditional statistical analysis confirms that the ΛCDM model is robust, yielding expected parameter values. Other models show deviations, with the generalised and modified Chaplygin gas models performing poorly. In the machine learning analysis, feature selection techniques, particularly Boruta, significantly improve model performance. In particular, models initially considered weak (generalised or modified Chaplygin gas) show significant improvement after feature selection.
Conclusions. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a data-driven approach to cosmological model evaluation. The ΛCDM model remains robust, while machine learning techniques, in particular feature selection, reveal potential improvements to alternative models that could be relevant for new observational campaigns, such as the recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey.
Key words: equation of state / methods: data analysis / supernovae: general / cosmological parameters / dark energy
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.