Table 7
Bayes factors of different fits of GW Lup.
| mol(1) | Σ range | T range | lnB(2) | Pref(3) | Evidence(4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H20 | No | Yes | -0.00 | No | None |
| H2O | No | No | –2.42 | No | Weak |
| CO2 | No | Yes | –1.61 | No | Weak |
| CO2 | No | No | –21.55 | No | Very strong |
| HCN | No | Yes | 0.26 | Yes | None |
| HCN | No | No | 0.86 | Yes | None |
| C2H2 | No | Yes | 0.17 | Yes | None |
| C2H2 | No | No | –0.21 | No | None |
| All | No | No | –23.16 | No | Very strong |
Notes. The original fit from Sect. 3.3 is compared to fits with less complexity. Every fit considers one molecule to be emitted from a single column density or additionally from a single temperature. (1)Molecule that is sampled differently compared to the original fit.(2) Logarithm of the Bayes factor between this fit and the original one.(3)Answer regarding whether this model is preferred over the original one. (4)Interpretation of B based on Trotta (2008).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.