Open Access

Fig. B.1.

image

Download original image

Comparison between asteroseismic parameter estimates and the Gaia-FLAME values. Left: Stellar mass estimate from our analysis. It is mostly consistent with the FLAME pipeline. However, there is a slight systematic offset to lower masses in our analysis. Centre: Most radii agree between the two methods, while some outliers with large radii from the asteroseismic analysis can be found. These stars typically have a higher asteroseismic age and are more evolved in our analysis. Right: Additional asteroseismic information from Π0 gives a good handle on the stellar age. Consequently, we observe a large scatter and a larger spread in age compared to Gaia-FLAME.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.