© T. Encrenaz et al. 2019

Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Water and sulfur dioxide are known to drive the atmospheric chemistry of Venus (Krasnopolsky 1986, 2007, 2010; Mills et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2012). Below the clouds, both species are present with volume mixing ratios of about 30 and 130 ppmv, respectively (Bézard & DeBergh 2012; Marcq et al. 2018), and at low latitudes are transported upward by Hadley convection. The SO₂ molecule is photodissociated, forms SO₃, and combines with water to form sulfuric acid H₂SO₄, which condenses to form the main component of the cloud deck. Above the cloudtop, the volume mixing ratios of H₂O and SO₂ drop to 1–3ppmv (Fedorova et al. 2008; Belyaev et al. 2012) and 10–1000 ppbv (Zasova et al. 1993; Marcq et al. 2013; Vandaele et al. 2017). While part of the sulfur combines with water to form H₂ SO₄, an extra sink is needed to explain its depletion, probably in the form of sulfur-rich aerosols within the clouds (F. Lefèvre, priv. comm.). Higher in the mesosphere, at about 90 km, another source of sulfur is needed to explain the detection of SO₂ and SO in submillimeter spectra (Sandor et al. 2010, 2012).

Extended space campaigns have been performed using Pioneer Venus, the Venera spacecraft, Venus Express, and Akatsuki to better understand the sulfur and water cycles in the atmosphere of Venus, using imaging and spectroscopy in the ultraviolet and infrared ranges. As acomplement to these datasets, we have been using ground-based imaging spectroscopy in the thermal infrared since 2012 to map SO₂ and H₂O at the cloudtop of Venus and to monitor the behavior of these two species as a function of time, both on the short term (a few hours) and the long term (years). With respect to space data, our ground-based monitoring has the advantage of recording instantaneous images of the whole disk of Venus, allowing a simultaneous analysis of the SO₂ and H₂ O distributions as a function of latitude, longitude, and local hour; in addition, observations in the thermal infrared allow us to observe the night side of the planet, which is not possible in the UV range.

Results of the first runs (January 2012–January 2016) have been presented in Encrenaz et al. (2012, 2013, 2016, hereafter E12, E13, E16). Data were recorded in two spectral ranges, around 1345 cm⁻¹ (7.4 μm) and 530 cm⁻¹ (18.9 μm). The 7.4 μm radiation probes the cloudtop, while the 18.9 μm radiation comes from within the clouds, a few kilometers below the cloudtop. The main result of these studies is that SO₂ and H₂ O exhibit very different behaviors: H₂O is always uniformly distributed over the disk and shows moderate variations on the long term; in contrast, the SO₂ maps are most often very patchy, showing SO₂ plumes which appear and disappear within a timescale of a few hours. The disk-integrated SO₂ abundance shows strong variations over the long term, with a contrast factor of about 10 between the minimum value observed in February 2014 and the maximum value in January 2016 (an even higher value of the SO₂ volume mixing ratio was observed in July 2018).

In this paper we first describe the observations performed between January 2016 and September 2018. In our previous analysis (E16), we presented the first part of a run performed in January 2016 (January 13–January 17, 2016). In the present paper we focus on the 7.4 μm dataset, which allows us to study the behavior of SO₂ and HDO at the cloudtop. We consider the whole dataset of the January 2016 run (January 13–January 21), and the subsequent runs obtained between December 2016 and September 2018 (see Table A.1). Then we use the whole TEXES dataset (2012–2018) at 7.4 μm to perform a statistical analysis of the SO₂ plumes, regarding their shape, their lifetime, and their appearance as a function of latitude, longitude, and local hour. Observations are presented and discussed in Sect. 2. In Sect. 3 we describe the statistical analysis of the SO₂ plumes. In Sect. 4 we present a comparative analysis of the SO₂ and H₂ O volume mixing ratios. In Sect. 5 we compare our results with other measurements from Venus Express and Akatsuki. In Sect. 6 we present a summary of our conclusions. The comparative study of the SO₂ maps at 7.4 and 18.9 μm, allowing a retrieval of the vertical distribution of SO₂, will be performed in a subsequent paper.

2 Observations and modeling

2.1 Observations

The Texas Echelon Cross-Echelle Spectrograph (TEXES) is an imaging high-resolution infrared spectrometer in operationat the NASA InfraRed telescope Facility (Lacy et al. 2002). TEXES operates between 5 and 25 μm (400–2000 cm⁻¹) and combines high spectral capabilities (R = 80 000 at 7 μm) and good imaging capabilities (spatial resolution around 1 arcsec). As for our previous observations, we selected the 1342–1348 cm⁻¹ (7.4 μm) interval in order to optimize the number of weak and strong transitions of SO₂, HDO, and CO₂. At 1345 cm⁻¹, the spectral resolution is 0.017 cm⁻¹ (R = 80 000). Thelength and the width of the slit were 6.0 and 1.0 arcsec, respectively. As in the case of our previous observations, we aligned the slit along the north-south celestial axis and we shifted it from west to east with a step of half the slit width and an integration time of 2 s per position. As the diameter of Venus was always larger than the slit length, we recorded several scans successively in order to build a full map. The TEXES data cubes were calibrated using the standard radiometric method (Lacy et al. 2002, Rohlfs & Wilson 2004).

Table A.1 summarizes the TEXES observations from 2016 to 2018 obtained at 7.4 μm. The run performed in January 2016 (9 consecutive days) completes the data shown in E16.

Figure 1 shows the geometrical configurations of the disk of Venus during the six TEXES runs of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Two of the runs (January 2016 and July 2017) correspond to the morning terminator, while the others correspond to the evening terminator. As discussed in E13, these two different geometrical configurations lead to different thermal structures at high latitude.

As in our previous studies, we focus our analysis on the 1344.8–1345.4 cm⁻¹ range, which includes several weakSO₂ transitions, two weak CO₂ lines, and one weak HDO line. The spectroscopic parameters of the lines used in our analysis are listed in Table 3 of E16. As discussed below (Sect. 2.2), the choice of weak transitions is mandatory for estimating the SO₂ and H₂ O volume mixing ratios on the basis of the SO₂/CO₂ and HDO/CO₂ line depth ratios. Figure 2 shows examples of disk-integrated spectra recorded during each run at 7.4 μm. The SO₂ and CO₂ lines have the advantage of being free of telluric contamination. In contrast, it can be seen that the HDO line at 1344.899 cm⁻¹ falls in the wing of a broad telluric absorption. As a result, the retrieval of the H₂ O disk-integrated volume mixing ratio is more uncertain than the SO₂ retrieval. In contrast, the quality of the H₂O map should not be affected by this effect, since the telluric contamination affects all pixels of the map in the same way.

Figure 3 shows six maps of the CO₂ line depth at 7.4 μm, corresponding to each of our observing runs between January 2016 and September 2018. As in the previous cases, we used the weak CO₂ transition at 1345.22 cm⁻¹. The CO₂ line depth gives us information on the temperature gradient just above the level that is probed at 7.4 μm in the continuum (E13, E16). It has been noticed from previous TEXES observations that, around the polar collar, when the morning terminator is observed, the gradient becomes close to zero or even negative. In this case, the SO₂ and HDO mixing ratios cannot be retrieved. It can be seen from Fig. 3 that a similar effect is also observed, although not as clearly, in our latest runs. The study of the thermal structure around the polar collar as a function of the local time will be the subject of a subsequent publication.

As in our previous 7.4 μm analyses, we obtain an estimate of the volume mixing ratios of SO₂ and HDO with respect to CO₂ by taking the line depth ratio of the SO₂ multiplet (at 1345.3 cm⁻¹) or the HDO transition (at 1344.9 cm⁻¹) to the CO₂ transition (at 1345.2 cm⁻¹), as shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 4 shows the maps of the SO₂ volume mixing ratio obtained from the data corresponding to Figs. 2 and 3, using the transitions mentioned above. It can be seen that a maximum of the SO₂ mixing ratiois observed on July 2018.

In order to better constrain the short-term variations of the SO₂ plumes, we analyzed in more detail the time sequence of nine consecutive days recorded between January 13, 2016, and January 21, 2016. The first half of this sequence was presented in E16. The entire time series of the SO₂/CO₂ ratio maps at 7.4 μm is shown in Fig. 5. The behavior of the SO₂ plumes is analyzed below (Sect. 3.1).

	Fig. 1 Geometrical configurations of the disk of Venus during the six TEXES runs of 2016, 2017, and 2018. The terminator is indicated with a black line and the subsolar point with a black dot. The January 2016 and July 2017 runs correspond to the morning terminator; the four other runs correspond to the evening terminator.
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 2 Examples of disk-integrated spectra of Venus between 1344.8 and 1345.4 cm−1 (7.4 μm) recorded between January 2016 and September 2018.
Open with DEXTER

2.2 Atmospheric modeling

A radiative transfer model is required to convert the SO₂/CO₂ and HDO/CO₂ line depth ratios (ldr) into SO₂ and H₂O volume mixing ratios (vmr). We used the same line-by-line radiative transfer code as for our previous analyses. The effect of scattering isneglected as – following the cloud model of Crisp (1986), using mode 1 and mode 2 spherical particles with a H₂ SO₄ concentration of 0.75 – the mean single scattering albedo is found to be 0.075 at 7.4 μm. The thermal profile in the Venus mesosphere and the spectroscopic parameters of the SO₂, HDO, and CO₂ transitions are described in E16. Using this model, the vmr values of SO₂ and H₂O at the cloudtop (in our model z = 61 km, T = 231 K, P = 100 mb) are derived from the ldr values using the following conversion factor (E16):

vmr(SO₂) (ppbv) = ldr(SO₂) × 600.0

vmr(H₂O) (ppmv) = ldr (HDO) × 1.5

To convert the HDO vmr into the H₂O vmr, we assume, following Fedorova et al. (2008), a D/H ratio of 200 times the Vienna Standard Ocean Water (VSMOW).

The validity of the conversion method is discussed in E12. Its main assumption is that, in the range of mixing ratios considered here, the line depths of the SO₂, HDO, and CO₂ lines used in our calculations vary linearly with the mixing ratios of these species. In the case of Mars, we show that this method is valid for line depths weaker than about ten percent (Encrenaz et al. 2008, 2015) for deriving H₂ O₂ and HDO vmr from the H₂ O₂/CO₂ and HDO/CO₂ ldr. In the case of Venus, we have shown that, in the 1350 cm⁻¹ range, for SO₂ and HDO lines weaker than ten percent in depth, the linearity with depth is verified with an uncertainty of about ten percent (E12).

	Fig. 3 Examples of maps of the line depth of the weak CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1 (7.4 μm), corresponding to the observations shown in Fig. 2. The scale is the same for the four maps. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER

3 Statistical study of the behavior of the SO₂ plumes

Using the whole TEXES dataset between 2012 and 2018, we performed a statistical study of the SO₂ plumes with respect to their lifetimes, and of their distribution as a function of latitude, longitude, and local time.

	Fig. 4 Maps of the line depth ratio of a weak SO2 multiplet (around 1345.1 cm−1) to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1. The data are the same as in Figs. 2 and 3. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot. The scale is not the same for the six maps; the maximum SO2 abundance is observed in July 2018.
Open with DEXTER

3.1 Lifetime of the SO₂ plumes

Our previous datasets (E13, E16) indicate that the typical lifetime of the SO₂ plumes is about a few hours, on the basis of data recorded in July 2014, March 2015, and January 2016. Here we analyze the behavior of the SO₂ plumes in more detail, on the basis of the full dataset.

We can identify two types of SO₂ plumes:

• well-localized plumes, showing an intensity as much as 4 times higher than in other areas of the disk, which appear in most of the January 2016 maps;

• broad SO₂ emissions covering a wide range of longitude; this is the case, in particular, in January 2017, July 2017, and September 2018; in July 2018, the SO₂ disk-integrated intensity was at its maximum over the whole 2012–2017 dataset.

The January 2016 sequence of SO₂ maps at 7.4 μm can give us some insight into the lifetime of the isolated SO₂ plumes. On January 16 and 21, 2016, we see a plume appearing within a timescale of 2 h. Once a plume is formed, it tends to weaken and spread in longitude with a motion compatible with the four-day rotation of the clouds (7.5° in 2 h); this is observed on January 13, 14, 15, 17, and 19, 2016. In other cases, the SO₂ plume disappears or weakens within two hours (January 20, 2016). Using the January 2016 dataset, we can observe that the lifetime of the SO₂ is definitely shorter than 24 h; there is no example of a SO₂ observed on a given day and still present at a longitude shifted by 90W the next day. In other words, the SO₂ maps show no memory of the SO₂ distribution found the previous day. It should be noted that this result is consistent with the timescale of 5 × 10⁴ s derived by Marcq et al. (2013) near the equator.

	Fig. 5 Maps of the SO2/CO2 line depth ratio, using SO2 multiplets (around 1345.1 and 1345.3 cm−1) divided by the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1, between January 13, 2016, and January 21, 2016. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER

3.2 Distribution of the SO₂ plumes as a function of latitude

We selected a list of 34 SO₂ maps at 7.4 μm, one per day. For each day, we selected the map corresponding to the maximum intensity of the SO₂ plume and noted the location of the SO₂ maximum versus latitude, longitude, and local time. Table 1 lists the observations used for the present study. The SO₂ volume mixing indicated for each map refers to the maximum value at the center of the plume. We considered a single map per day in order to avoid the duplication of a given SO₂ plume over several hours. Since the SO₂ lifetime is significantly shorter than a day, we can consider all 34 maps as independent measurements.

We wondered whether our analysis might be affected by an airmass effect, as the altitude probed by the observations depends upon the emission angle. Our previous analysis (E13) showed that the SO₂ vertical distribution decreases above the cloudtop as the altitude increases, so this effect would tend to enhance the measured SO₂ mixing ratio at the disk center where the deepest levels are probed. However, the SO₂ maps retrieved from our observations do not show this effect: there is no evidence for a SO₂ enhancement at the disk center. The reason is probably that the SO₂ horizontal variations over the disk are usually much larger than the vertical SO₂ variations induced by the emission angle variations.

Figure 6 shows the distribution of the SO₂ plumes as a function of latitude. It can be seen that the distribution strongly peaks toward the equator, with most of the features appearing within the 30N–30S latitude range. We must remember that the identification of plumes at high latitude, outside the (60N,60S) range, may be uncertain due to the peculiar shape of the thermal profile around the polar collar when the morning terminator is observed. In this case, when the thermal profile becomes close to isothermal, the retrieval of SO₂ and HDO is no longer possible because the SO₂ and CO₂ line depths become very small. For this reason, in the following analysis, we limit our study to the SO₂ plumes located within 30° of the equator.

An interesting feature was observed during our run of July 2017. Figure 7 shows four SO₂ maps, two for July 12 and two for July 13, each subset separated in time by 3 h. The maps of July 12 exhibit a double structure, symmetrical with respect to the equator, extending at high northern and southern latitudes. A few other maps (January 16 and 19, 2016, Fig. 5; September 24, 2018) seem to show a similar trend.

3.3 Distribution of the SO₂ plumes as a function of longitude

For each observation listed in Table 1, we calculated the longitude range available in the field of view, and measured the longitude range covered by the SO₂ plume listed in Table 1. It should be noted that the peak longitude of the SO₂ plume is easy to define, whereas its width may be more difficult to determine. In the case of a patchy, highly contrasted SO₂ distribution over the disk (as shown in Fig. 4 on December 23, 2016, for instance), we used the FWHM of the SO₂ plume. In cases where the SO₂ distribution was more extended (as in Fig. 4 for January 30 and July 13, 2017) we used a longitude range narrower than the FWHM to better isolate the maximum longitude. For each day, we selected the map showing the strongest SO₂ plume and, within the disk, in case of multiple features, we chose the position of the strongest plume.

We then added all observable longitude ranges to obtain the longitude visibility curve corresponding to our dataset. We added in the same way all longitude ranges where a SO₂ plume was present. Dividing this curve by the longitude visibility curve gives us the probability of SO₂ appearance as a function of the longitude. Results are shown in Figs. 8 and 9. It can be seen (Fig. 8) that the longitude 100E–200E range is less observed than the 300E–50E range in theopposite hemisphere by a factor of about 2. Figure 9 shows the probability of SO₂ plume appearance as a function of longitude. Two regions, one located at 100E–150E and the other at around 300E, could possibly indicate a depletion of the SO₂ plume appearance. The 100E–150E region is located over Aphrodite Terra. Our statistics are presently not sufficient for us to derive a firm conclusion.

	Fig. 6 Distribution of the location of the SO2 plumes as a function of latitude.
Open with DEXTER

Fig. 7 Maps of the line depth ratio of a weak SO2 multiplet around 1345.1 cm−1 to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1. Data correspond to the July 12 and 13, 2017. It can be seen for each day that the SO2 plumes follow the four-day rotation, corresponding to an angle of 15° westward for a time difference of 4 h. In both cases, the intermediate maps taken between the first and last ones reproduce the SO2 pattern shown in this figure. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.

Open with DEXTER

3.4 Distribution of the SO₂ plumes as a function of local time

The same study was performed to estimate the probability of SO₂ plume appearance as a function of local time (Figs. 10 and 11). Figure 10 shows that the dayside is most observed, with a maximum around noon, while there are few observations around midnight. Figure 11 shows the probability of SO₂ plume appearance as a function of local time. A depletion seems to appear around noon, with a possible enhancement around the terminators. Between 22:00 and 02:30, the statistics are too low for the result to be significant. The SO₂ depletion tentatively observed around noon (Fig. 11) is also observed on some of our maps; as shown in Fig. 7, the two maps are separated by 3 h in time and distinctly show a minimum of SO₂ around the subsolar point and a maximum around the anti-solar region. The fact that the depletion around the subsolar point persists from July 12 to July 13, 2017, illustrates that this feature is not associated with the four-day rotation. We note that the configuration observed in July 2017 is also observed on December 23, 2016 (Fig. 4).

A possible explanation for this depletion might be a suppression of the cloud level convection, which could inhibit transport through the cloud layer, as suggested by Imamura et al. (2018). Other possible explanations might be a photochemical process, as suggested by the subsolar depletion, and/or a dynamical wave pattern. We could also wonder if the SO₂ variation as a function of the local time might be the effect of a subsolar–anti-solar circulation. However, this seems unlikely, since this circulation is typically observed at higher altitudes, around 90 km (Lellouch et al. 2008), while the four-day super-rotation dominates at the cloudtop probed at 7.4 μm; we have seen that this super-rotation is actually observed on some SO₂ plumes on atimescale of a few hours (E16).

	Fig. 8 Summation of all longitudes observed by TEXES over the 2012–2018 period, using the 34 observations listed in Table 1 (red curve). Summation of all longitudes where a SO2 plume was present, using the same dataset (blue curve).
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 9 Probability of SO2 appearance as a function of longitude, using the same dataset as in Table 1 and Fig. 8. The error bar is proportional to n−0.5, where n is the number of observations for which the longitude is observed (red curve in Fig. 8).
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 10 Summation of all local time observed by TEXES over the 2012–2018 period, using the 34 observations listed in Table 1 (red curve). Summation of all local times for which a SO2 plume was present, using the same dataset (blue curve).
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 11 Probability of SO2 appearance as a function of local time, using the data shown in Table 1 and Fig. 10. The error bar is proportional to n−0.5, where n is the number of observations for which the local time is observed (red curve in Fig. 10).
Open with DEXTER

4 Comparative analysis of the SO₂ and H₂O variations

4.1 HDOmaps in 2016 and 2017

Figure 12 shows examples of HDO maps recorded between January 2016 and July 2018, using the same observations as shown in Figs. 2–4. Figure 13 shows the HDO maps corresponding to the sequence of January 13–21, 2016. A difference should be noted with respect to the maps shownin E16 for the first half of this sequence. We realized in some cases that the terrestrial atmospheric transmission dominates the spectrum in such a way that the HDO retrieval is not reliable, and the HDO map should be excluded. This was the case for the HDO maps of October 5, 2012, July 7, 2014, and January 14, 2016, shown in our previous paper. In the present analysis, we limit the HDO analysis to the data showing little telluric contamination.

The maps shown in Figs. 12 and 13 confirm our earlier statements regarding the water distribution over the disk of Venus and its evolution as a function of time. The HDO maps are remarkably uniform over the Venus disk, showing no patchy feature comparable to the SO₂ maps or any signature that could be associated with the latitude, longitude, or local time. In particular, we see no correlation or anti-correlation between the SO₂ and HDO mixing ratios on a local scale. It is interesting to compare the SO₂ and HDO maps recorded on July 13, 2017 (Figs. 4 and 12). The atmospherictransmission was especially good on that date, as shown in Fig. 2. While the SO₂ distribution shows a factor of 4 variation between the anti-solar region (maximum) and subsolar (minimum) region, the HDO distribution is flat all over the disk down to the 15% level. Another example of the homogeneity of the HDO distribution is shown in Fig. 14, where HDO maps are presented for different local time ranges, on January 21, 2017 (evening terminator), and July 13, 2017 (morning terminator). The HDO map of July 12, 2017, is integrated over the four observations described in Table A.1. It can be seen that the fluctuations of the HDO vmr over the disk are below 10% for the morning and the evening configurations.

	Fig. 12 Maps of the line depth ratio of the HDO transition at 1344.90 cm−1 to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1. Data are the same as in Figs. 2–4. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER

4.2 Long-term variations of SO₂ and H₂O from 2012 to 2017

Figure 15 shows the long-term variations of SO₂ and H₂ O over the whole TEXES dataset. As in our previous analysis, the SO₂ and HDO volume mixing ratios are inferred from the SO₂/CO₂ and HDO/CO₂ line depth ratios measured on the disk-integrated spectra corresponding to each observation; the SO₂ mixing ratios are thus lower than the values listed in Table 1, which correspond to the maxima volume mixing ratios of the SO₂ plumes. As mentioned above, the H₂O mixing ratios are inferred with the assumption that the mesospheric value of D/H in Venus is 200 times the VSMOW (Fedorova et al. 2008).

In the case of SO₂, unlike our previous analysis (E16), we limited our analysis to the 7.4 μm data. We note that the retrieval of the SO₂ volume mixing ratio at 18.9 μm (already difficult for low abundances of SO₂ because of the strong curvature of the continuum, see E16) becomes uncertain when the SO₂ content is large because the SO₂ and CO₂ transitions overlap; this restriction applies to all data taken in 2016 and 2017. The analysis of the 18.9 μm SO₂ data in 2016 and 2017 will be performed in a forthcoming publication. In the case of HDO, we disregarded the observations corresponding to a high terrestrial opacity. There seems to be a trend for H₂ O to decrease as a function of time between 2016 and 2018, from about 1.2 ppmv in 2016 to 0.5 ppmv in 2018; similarly, there may be a long-term increase in the SO₂ mixing ratio from 2014 (minimum value of 30 ppbv) to 2018 (maximum value of 600 ppbv). However, as mentioned in our earlier studies, we see no clear evidence for an anti-correlation in the long-term variability of SO₂ and H₂ O at the cloudtop.

	Fig. 13 Maps of the HDO/CO2 line depth ratio, using the HDO transition at 1344.90 cm−1, divided by the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1, between January 13, 2016, and January 21, 2016. Data are the same as in Fig. 5.
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 14 Maps of the HDO/CO2 line depth ratio, using the HDO transition at 1344.90 cm−1 to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1, on January 21, 2017, and July 12, 2017. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 15 Long-term variations of the H2O volume mixing ratio (top panel), inferred from the HDO measurements, and the SO2 volume mixing ratio (bottom panel), measured at the cloudtop using the TEXES data at 7.4 μm.
Open with DEXTER

5 Comparative analysis of TEXES results with Venus Express and Akatsuki space data

The time range covered by our dataset (2012–2017) overlaps with two sets of UV space data, the first recorded by Venus Express (2006–2015)and the second by Akatsuki (in operation since December 2016). In the UV range, the distribution of the SO₂ gas above the cloudtop can be approximated using the 283 nm spectral feature, where the SO₂ absorption is stronger than other agents (Pollack et al. 1980). We note that the UV radiation comes from a slightly higher level that the IR radiation, i.e., a few kilometers above the cloudtop.

5.1 Comparison of TEXES with Akatsuki/UVI

Figure 16 shows an example of the anti-correlation observed between the TEXES SO₂ map (inferred from the ratio of absorption depths of SO₂ and CO₂) and the map of the UV (λ = 283 nm) albedo, as measured by the UV imager (UVI) on board Akatsuki on January 21, 2017. The observation time was 03:43–04:18 UT and 01:46 UT for TEXES and Akatsuki, respectively. The UV radiances measured by Akatuki UVI were corrected for the incident and emission angle dependences of reflection assuming the Lambert Lommel-Seeliger law (Lee et al. 2017), and projected on a disk map corresponding to the geometry observed from the Earth. It is clearly shown that the dark (low-albedo) regions on the UV map match the large SO₂ regions in the TEXES data. The very good agreement (shown by a correlation factor of 0.89) between the two maps indicates that using imaging spectroscopy, in the UV at 283 nm and in the IR at 7.4 μm, provides equally good tracersof the SO₂ abundance above the clouds. As a result, TEXES maps can be used to extrapolate the day side’s UV maps of Akatsuki to the night side.

This comparison was performed for nine datasets of Akatsuki and TEXES (observation time differences within a maximum of 6 h). The correlation plot is shown in Fig. 17. For this quantitative comparison, Akatsuki data were smoothed to the same spatial resolution as the TEXES observations. Very good anti-correlations are observed between Akatsuki UV albedo and TEXES SO₂ maps on December 16 and 22, 2016, and on January 20–22, 2017, whereas some have no strong correlations. The reason might be that the 283 nm channel is sensitive to the SO₂ band, but also possibly to the UV absorber which in some cases might have a different spatial distribution from that of SO₂. Further analysis using radiative transfer calculations will be performed in a future work.

	Fig. 16 Left panel: UV albedo map derived from the Akatsuki UVI data recorded on January 21, 2017, at 01:46 UT. Dashed lines represent the equator and the evening terminator. Right panel: TEXES map of the SO2 volume mixing ratio at the cloudtop, inferred from the SO2/CO2 line depth ratio at 7.4 μm on January 21, 2017, at 03:43–04:18 UT.
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 17 Correlation between Akatsuki UV albedo at λ = 283 nm and TEXES SO2 maps. The label “corr” indicates the correlation factor for the comparison data.
Open with DEXTER

5.2 Comparison of TEXES with SPICAV aboard Venus Express

Between 2006 and 2015, the abundance of SO₂ above the clouds was monitored by the UV spectrometer SPICAV aboard Venus Express, through the measurement of the 283 nm absorption band of SO₂ (Marcq et al. 2013).SO₂ maps were obtained as a function of time, latitude, longitude, and local time. Figure 18 shows a comparison of the SO₂ volume mixing ratio observed by SPICAV above the clouds and the SO₂ vmr recorded by TEXES at the cloudtop. A scaling factor was applied to the TEXES data to take into account the SO₂ depletion above the clouds, according to a scale height of about 3 km: at the altitude of 70 km probed in the UV, the SO₂ vmr is expected to be about 3 times lower than its value at the cloudtop. It can be seen that the agreement between the two datasets is satisfactory.

Figure 19 shows a comparison between the SO₂ volume mixing ratioas a function of the local time, as seen by SPICAV aboard Venus Express between 2006 and 2015, and the probability of SO₂ plume occurrence as seen by TEXES between 2012 and 2017. In both cases, a minimum seems to appear around noon. We note that the two quantities are not equivalent since the probability of occurrence of a SO₂ plume derived from the TEXES data does not take into account the intensity of the plume. More data will be needed to confirm this trend.

	Fig. 18 Volume mixing ratio of SO2 at an altitude of 70 km, inferred from the SPICAV data. Superimposed: TEXES measurements of SO2 rescaled for an altitude of 70 km.
Open with DEXTER

	Fig. 19 Top panel: SO2 volume mixing ratio, as observed by SPICAV aboard Venus Express at an altitude of 70 km as a function of local time, including all data between 2006 and 2015. Bottom panel: probability of occurrence of an SO2 plume as a function of local time, including TEXES data between 2012 and 2018 (see Fig. 11).
Open with DEXTER

6 Conclusions

In this paper, we presented the data of our SO₂ and HDO monitoring at the cloudtop of Venus using the TEXES instrument at 7.4 μm between January 2016 and September 2018. Then we used the whole TEXES dataset between 2012 and 2018 to analyze the behavior of the SO₂ as a function of time, latitude, longitude, and local time. The main results of this study can be summarized as follows:

• The SO₂ maps at the cloudtop show a patchy distribution over the disk, while the HDO maps are very uniform.

• The disk-integrated SO₂ volume mixing ratio at the cloudtop shows variations of over a factor of 10 between 2012 and 2018, with a minimum in February 2014 (30 ppbv) and a maximum in July 2018 (600 ppbv). At the same time, the H₂O volume mixing ratio (assuming a D/H of 200 × VSMOW in the Venus mesosphere, Fedorova et al. 2008) shows fewer variations, but a possible decrease from about 1.2 ppbv in 2016 to 0.5 ppbv in 2018.

• The SO₂ plumes are mostly concentrated around the equator, within the (30N–30S) latitude range.

• The SO₂ plume distribution as a function of longitude might indicate a depletion between 100E and 150E longitudes (corresponding to the region of Aphrodite Terra) and around 300E longitude; however, this trend remains to be confirmed with further observations.

• The SO₂ plume distribution as a function of local time seems to show a minimum occurrence around noon, with two possible maxima around the terminator. The depletion around 12:00, if confirmed, could be the signature of convection inhibition (Imamura et al. 2018), or photochemical processes associated with the incidence angle, or dynamical transport. Presently, the limited amount of data prevents us from drawing a firm conclusion on this phenomenon.

• A very good agreement is observed between the SO₂ measurements of TEXES and Akatsuki UVI regarding the local distribution of SO₂ over the Venus disk. The comparison of TEXES with the UV data of SPICAV aboard Venus Express also shows a good agreement for the long-term variations of the SO₂ intensity, and for the SO₂ distribution as a function of local time. These results illustrate that the TEXES data can be used to extrapolate the UV data on SO₂ over the night side.

It is interesting to note that theoretical models have predicted the possible occurrence of oscillations in the Venus atmosphere. Takagi et al. (2018) have modeled the latitude distribution of amplitude of the vertical wind associated with thermal tides with modes 1 (most dominant at any latitude), mode 2 (below 30N), mode 3 (at 30–40N) and mode 4 (at 30–70N). This means that mode 1 and mode 2 oscillations would be expected to be dominant below 30N. Further observations with TEXES, especially near inferior conjunctions and, whenever possible, coupled with Akatsuki campaigns, will hopefully allow us to better constrain the SO₂ behavior at the cloudtop over the day and night sides.

Acknowledgements

T.E. and T.K.G. were visiting astronomers at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NNX-08AE38A with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program. We wish to thank the IRTF staff for the support of the TEXES observations. This work was supported by the Programme National de Planétologie (PNP) of CNRS/INSU, co-funded by CNES. T.K.G. acknowledges the support of NASA Grant NNX14AG34G. E.M. acknowledges support from ESA and CNES for the analysis of the SPICAV-UV data. T.E. and B.B. acknowledge support from CNRS. T.F. acknowledges support from UPMC. T.W. acknowledges support from the University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin and the European Commission Framework Program FP7 under Grant Agreement 606798 (Project EuroVenus).T.E. acknowledges support from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory as a Distinguished Visiting Scientist.

Appendix A Additional table

References

All Tables

All Figures

	Fig. 1 Geometrical configurations of the disk of Venus during the six TEXES runs of 2016, 2017, and 2018. The terminator is indicated with a black line and the subsolar point with a black dot. The January 2016 and July 2017 runs correspond to the morning terminator; the four other runs correspond to the evening terminator.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 2 Examples of disk-integrated spectra of Venus between 1344.8 and 1345.4 cm−1 (7.4 μm) recorded between January 2016 and September 2018.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 3 Examples of maps of the line depth of the weak CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1 (7.4 μm), corresponding to the observations shown in Fig. 2. The scale is the same for the four maps. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 4 Maps of the line depth ratio of a weak SO2 multiplet (around 1345.1 cm−1) to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1. The data are the same as in Figs. 2 and 3. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot. The scale is not the same for the six maps; the maximum SO2 abundance is observed in July 2018.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 5 Maps of the SO2/CO2 line depth ratio, using SO2 multiplets (around 1345.1 and 1345.3 cm−1) divided by the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1, between January 13, 2016, and January 21, 2016. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 6 Distribution of the location of the SO2 plumes as a function of latitude.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 7 Maps of the line depth ratio of a weak SO2 multiplet around 1345.1 cm−1 to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1. Data correspond to the July 12 and 13, 2017. It can be seen for each day that the SO2 plumes follow the four-day rotation, corresponding to an angle of 15° westward for a time difference of 4 h. In both cases, the intermediate maps taken between the first and last ones reproduce the SO2 pattern shown in this figure. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 8 Summation of all longitudes observed by TEXES over the 2012–2018 period, using the 34 observations listed in Table 1 (red curve). Summation of all longitudes where a SO2 plume was present, using the same dataset (blue curve).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 9 Probability of SO2 appearance as a function of longitude, using the same dataset as in Table 1 and Fig. 8. The error bar is proportional to n−0.5, where n is the number of observations for which the longitude is observed (red curve in Fig. 8).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 10 Summation of all local time observed by TEXES over the 2012–2018 period, using the 34 observations listed in Table 1 (red curve). Summation of all local times for which a SO2 plume was present, using the same dataset (blue curve).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 11 Probability of SO2 appearance as a function of local time, using the data shown in Table 1 and Fig. 10. The error bar is proportional to n−0.5, where n is the number of observations for which the local time is observed (red curve in Fig. 10).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 12 Maps of the line depth ratio of the HDO transition at 1344.90 cm−1 to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1. Data are the same as in Figs. 2–4. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 13 Maps of the HDO/CO2 line depth ratio, using the HDO transition at 1344.90 cm−1, divided by the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1, between January 13, 2016, and January 21, 2016. Data are the same as in Fig. 5.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 14 Maps of the HDO/CO2 line depth ratio, using the HDO transition at 1344.90 cm−1 to the CO2 transition at 1345.22 cm−1, on January 21, 2017, and July 12, 2017. The subsolar point is shown as a white dot.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 15 Long-term variations of the H2O volume mixing ratio (top panel), inferred from the HDO measurements, and the SO2 volume mixing ratio (bottom panel), measured at the cloudtop using the TEXES data at 7.4 μm.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 16 Left panel: UV albedo map derived from the Akatsuki UVI data recorded on January 21, 2017, at 01:46 UT. Dashed lines represent the equator and the evening terminator. Right panel: TEXES map of the SO2 volume mixing ratio at the cloudtop, inferred from the SO2/CO2 line depth ratio at 7.4 μm on January 21, 2017, at 03:43–04:18 UT.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 17 Correlation between Akatsuki UV albedo at λ = 283 nm and TEXES SO2 maps. The label “corr” indicates the correlation factor for the comparison data.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 18 Volume mixing ratio of SO2 at an altitude of 70 km, inferred from the SPICAV data. Superimposed: TEXES measurements of SO2 rescaled for an altitude of 70 km.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

	Fig. 19 Top panel: SO2 volume mixing ratio, as observed by SPICAV aboard Venus Express at an altitude of 70 km as a function of local time, including all data between 2006 and 2015. Bottom panel: probability of occurrence of an SO2 plume as a function of local time, including TEXES data between 2012 and 2018 (see Fig. 11).
Open with DEXTER
In the text