Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833685e]


Table 3.

Parameters for measurement method comparison and quadrant misalignment experimental runs.

Optical bench and numerical simulation configuration
Telescope D = 18.0 m diameter
Circular pupil – No obstruction

Single von Karman ground layer
Turbulence layer r0 = 12.9 cm–L0 = 25 m
m s−1

Source On-axis natural guide star
Readout noise 0.3 e (bench: added numerically)

Loop rate Simulated as 500 Hz

Tip-tilt mirror
(bench: physical mount)
Deformable mirrors Square pitch piezo-stack
(bench: on LCOS-SLM)a
Piezo-stack mirror 39 × 39 actuators – Total 1,177 in pupil

PWFS subapertures 44 × 44 (simu.)–46 × 46 (bench)
PWFS wavelength Monochromatic at 658 nm
PWFS modulation Circular, tunable radius.
Simulation method Focal phase mask
(quadrants interferences included)

Modal integrator
Controller Optimized Karhunen–Loëve basisb
(defined on DM actuators)
Controller Gain Optimized scalar loop gain
Modal sensitivity compensationc,d

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.