EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 593 (September 2016) A&A, 593 (2016) L6 Full HTML
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 593, September 2016
Article Number L6
Number of page(s) 5
Section Letters
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629292
Published online 08 September 2016

© ESO, 2016

1. Introduction

The discs of some galaxies have been divided into a thin and a thick component since Burstein (1979) and Tsikoudi (1979). Thick discs are better seen in close to edge-on galaxies, where the vertical structure of discs can be studied. In fact, thick discs have been found in most of the edge-on galaxies that have been searched for these discs (Yoachim & Dalcanton 2006; Comerón et al. 2011b) with a few possible exceptions among low-mass galaxies (Comerón et al. 2011a; Streich et al. 2016). The Milky Way is also know to have a thick disc (Gilmore & Reid 1983).

In our work on photometric decompositions of edge-on galaxies we proposed that stars in thick discs have an internal origin, at least for galaxies with circular velocities vc ≳ 120 km s-1 (from now on we call those high-mass galaxies; Comerón et al. 2011a, 2012, 2014). However, obtaining direct evidence of an internal origin requires thick disc kinematics. This is because thick discs formed via external accretion would result, at least in some galaxies, in a fraction of counter-rotating stars acquired in retrograde encounters.

Because of the technical difficulties arising when obtaining spectroscopy of faint features, only seven stellar thick disc rotation curves are known in high-mass galaxies, namely those in FGCE 1498 and FGCE 1371 (Yoachim & Dalcanton 2008), that in ESO 533-4 (Comerón et al. 2015), that in NGC 3115 (Guérou et al. 2016), and those in NGC 4111, NGC 4710, and NGC 5422 (Kasparova et al. 2016). The thick discs of all those galaxies have prograde rotation curves that lag at most a few tens of kilometers per second with respect to the thin discs. The Milky Way thick disc is also prograde (Chiba & Beers 2000). On the other hand, the few observed rotation curves in low-mass galaxies have a larger variety than those in high-mass galaxies. For example, some of these rotation curves show little net rotation (Yoachim & Dalcanton 2005, 2008).

If thick discs were accreted, their stars would have been obtained in encounters with small impact angles with respect to the disc. This is because dynamical friction would drag such low inclination satellites towards the plane of the galaxy. Satellites with a large impact angle would have their stars ending in the stellar halo (Read et al. 2008).

An important question to study is to find out if origin of thick discs is internal or external. If the accretion of stars through several minor mergers were creating thick discs, one would expect to always find retrograde stars in them because roughly similar amounts of prograde and retrograde mergers would occur in a given galaxy (Read et al. 2008). However, if thick discs were formed in a small number of encounters, there would be no guarantee for a given galaxy to have a retrograde thick disc. In the limit in which thick discs were created in a single merger, there would be similar chances to have a retrograde or a prograde encounter. Thus, based on the kinematics of the above-mentioned eight thick discs, a major merger origin cannot be ruled out as the main thick disc formation mechanism in high-mass galaxies. To completely discard this theory, it is important to increase the number of known thick disc rotation curves.

The Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) instrument at the Very Large Telescope (VLT) (Bacon et al. 2010) is an integral field unit with a large field of view (FOV) of 1′ × 1′, which makes it ideal for the study of nearby galaxies. ESO 243-49 was observed during the science verification phase. The whole galaxy fits within the MUSE FOV. ESO 243-49 was classified as an S0 galaxy by Dressler (1980). The MUSE data show that the galaxy has a conspicuous round bulge and no evidence of recent intense star formation, which indeed makes it an S0 galaxy. It is located at a distance of ~95 Mpc if we consider a heliocentric radial velocity of VHelio = 6667 km s-1 (Jones et al. 2009) and a Hubble-Lemaître constant H0 = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1. ESO 243−49 is a member of the Abell 2877 cluster and hosts the ultra-luminous X-ray source HLX-1, which is the most likely candidate for an intermediate mass black hole (Farrell et al. 2009).

2. Preparation of the science data cube

The MUSE data of ESO 243-49 are made of 16 exposures (8100 s total exposure). For each exposure a data cube was created using the MUSE reduction pipeline within the Reflex environment (Freudling et al. 2013). The target did not occupy the whole FOV, so we set the pipeline to create a sky model using spaxels outside the galaxy (15% of all spaxels). Then, the 16 data cubes were manually aligned. We combined them using the muse_exp_combine recipe. The sky residuals of the combined data cube were removed with Zurich Atmosphere Purge (ZAP; Soto et al. 2016). The wavelength range of the final data cube is 4750−9350 Å.

3. Thin and thick disc decomposition

thumbnail Fig. 1

Vertical surface brightness profile at 3.6 μm for regions between 10 and 30″ from the galaxy centre (large dots). The dotted line denotes the fit to the profile and the dashed lines denote the thin and thick disc contributions. zT and zt indicate the thick and thin disc scale heights. The grey dot-dashed line indicates the limit of the height range over which the fit was made.
Open with DEXTER

We obtained a 3.6 μm image of ESO 243-49 from the Spitzer Heritage Archive. We then created a surface brightness profile of the galaxy perpendicular to the midplane. We only considered the regions between 10 and 30″ from the centre (Fig. 1) because we ignored the bulge region, where velocity dispersion σ is about or larger than 100 km s-1 in Sect. 4. We fitted the profile with the thin/thick disc decomposition code used in Comerón et al. (2011a, 2012, 2015). The code assumes two coupled vertically isothermal stellar discs. To carry out the fit, we used the two-dimensional (2D) point spread function (PSF) from Salo et al. (2015).

Making a thin/thick disc fit requires that we know the ratio between the mass-to-light ratios of the thick and thin discs ((ΥT/ Υt)3.6 μm; Comerón et al. 2011a). It is necessary to know the ages and metallicities of the stellar populations to estimate that ratio. In Sect. 5 we find that both discs are old but have different metallicities ([Z/H] = 0.1 for the thin disc and [Z/H] = −0.15 for the thick disc). We used the spectral energy distribution libraries (SEDs) from Bruzual & Charlot (2003) to obtain the mass-to-light ratios of such populations at 3.6 μm. Linear interpolation was used to find SEDs intermediate between two metallicity templates. We considered an age of 13 Gyr for both discs. We found that the mass-to-light ratio of the thick disc is 1.04 times that of the thin disc ((ΥT/ Υt)3.6 μm = 1.04). Using that information in our thin/thick disc fit we find that the thick disc is 0.58 times as massive as the thin disc (ΣT/ Σt = 0.58).

The ΣT/ Σt estimate has several uncertainty sources. One is, of course, the determination of (ΥT/ Υt)3.6 μm. The value Υ3.6 μm changes little with age or metallicity for such old populations. Changes of 0.1 dex in metallicity or 1 Gyr in age would produce changes smaller than 10% in (ΥT/ Υt)3.6 μm. Since ΣT/ Σt roughly scales with ΥT/ Υt (Comerón et al. 2012), the errors in the disc mass determination associated with the determination of Υ3.6 μm would also be of that order. This is smaller than the ≲ 20% estimate of the error caused by approximations such as considering exactly the same radial scale length for the thin and thick discs or ignoring the vertical gravity field due to dark matter halo in the fit (Comerón et al. 2012).

Later on in this paper, we use the concept of thick disc dominated regions (Sect. 5). We define those regions as those at heights above . Above this height, about 82% of the light in the MUSE data cube comes from the thick disc. This number was calculated by convolving the 3.6 μm fitted disc components with a Gaussian with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) obtained from fitting the radial luminosity profiles of stars in the MUSE FOV. The FWHM varies between and within the instrument wavelength range. We also assumed that, on average, at MUSE wavelengths (ΥT/ Υt)MUSE = 0.81. Again, these mass-to-light ratios are based on the SEDS from Bruzual & Charlot (2003).

We compared the fit results to those of other early type galaxies (stages −3 ≤ T ≤ 1) with similar masses (circular velocity vc = 200 ± 40 km s-1; see Sect. 4 for the vc determination) in our previous studies. Four such galaxies are found in Comerón et al. (2012). Those galaxies have ΣT/ Σt values between 0.3 and 0.7, which are similar to what we find here.

4. The velocity field of ESO 243-49

thumbnail Fig. 2

Top: image of ESO 243-49 made by collapsing the MUSE data cube along its spectral direction. Middle: radial velocity map. Bottom: velocity dispersion map. The cross some 7″ to the NE of the centre of the galaxy indicates the location of the X-ray source HLX-1 based on the information in Mapelli et al. (2013). The continuous line indicates the midplane and the dashed lines indicate heights of 0.8, 1.6, and 2.4 kpc above and below the midplane.
Open with DEXTER

We produced a Voronoi tesselation of the combined data cube with the Cappellari & Copin (2003) software. We required a mean signal-to-noise ratio S/N = 25 per pixel in the range between 5490 Å and 5510 Å. We only considered spaxels for which S/N> 2 in that wavelength range. The number of bins is 3705.

To obtain the line-of-sight velocity distribution (LOSVD) of each of the bins, we fitted the 4750−8800Å range with the MIUSCAT stellar population synthesis models (Vazdekis et al. 2012) using the penalized pixel-fitting (pPXF) software by Cappellari & Emsellem (2004). An eight order additive Legendre polynomial was used to model the continuum. We masked the regions with sky emission lines with peak emissions larger than 2 × 10-18 W m-2 nm-1 in Hanuschik (2003). The mask width was 1000 km s-1. We masked the location of possible emission lines using the same mask width. We also masked the O2 − A telluric band with a 4400 km s-1 wide mask. We only fitted two momenta (velocity, V, and velocity dispersion, σ) because higher momenta would require higher S/N, which would preclude us from getting a high spacial resolution in low surface brightness regions.

An image, the velocity map, and the velocity dispersion map of ESO 243-49 are shown in Fig. 2. The canonical butterfly diagram of a rotating disc appears in the velocity map. The innermost 2′′ region has a small butterfly pattern that corresponds in size with the dust lane at the galaxy centre (Fig. 4). The butterfly thus indicates a nuclear disc. That very same region has velocity dispersions in excess of σ = 200 km s-1, which points to the presence of a classical bulge as also indicated by the roundness of the inner isophotes. We therefore suggest that ESO 243-49 has a composite bulge, such as those studied in Falcón-Barroso et al. (2006) and Erwin et al. (2015). The classical bulge might also cause the relatively high velocity dispersions of ~150 km s-13 kpc above and below the centre of the galaxy.

The rotation curve of ESO 243-49 at different heights above and below the midplane is shown in Fig. 3. The midplane rotation curve shows two peaks at projected radii R = ±2′′ that correspond to the nuclear disc. The rotation curve becomes flat at about R = 6′′ (2.8 kpc) with a circular velocity vc ≈ 200 km s-1. ESO 243-49 is therefore a high-mass galaxy whose mass is slightly below that of the Milky Way. The maximum velocity goes down as the height increases. At a height of (2.4 kpc), which is well into the thick disc dominated region, the stars lag by ~30−40 km s-1 with respect those in the midplane.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Velocity curves of ESO 243-49 for different heights above (left) and below the midplane (right).
Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 4

Unsharp mask of the central regions of ESO 243-49. The red line indicates the midplane of the galaxy.
Open with DEXTER

Is a ~30−40 km s-1 lag compatible with pure asymmetric drift or could it also include some effect due to a not perfectly edge-on orientation and/or to a fraction of retrograde stars? The dust lane in the innermost regions of ESO 243-49 runs exactly through the midplane of the galaxy (Fig. 4), which implies that it is not very far from edge-on and the lag is not due to projection effects. Also the lack of vertical asymmetries in the velocity map supports a close to edge-on orientation (see Comerón et al. 2015, for a galaxy where a 2−3° deviation from an edge-on orientation a significant impact in the velocity map). To figure out whether the lag is compatible with the absence of retrograde stars, we compared this lag with that found in a galaxy with a similar mass, i.e. the Milky Way. Several studies point to a lag in the range of 40−60 km s-1 for the thick disc of the Milky Way (Ojha et al. 1994; Soubiran et al. 2003; Pasetto et al. 2012; Kordopatis et al. 2015). More detailed studies that describe the asymmetric drift as a function of the height above the midplane find similar values for a height of z = 2.4 kpc (Bond et al. 2010; Moni Bidin et al. 2012). Thus, the lag of the thick disc of ESO 243-49 does not require large amounts of retrograde stars to be explained.

HLX-1 has been suggested to be at the centre of the nucleus of an accreted galaxy (Mapelli et al. 2013). Our kinematic maps show no sign of a disturbed rotation curve or increased velocity dispersion at the position of HLX-1, although a small increase in the velocity dispersion could be hidden by the fact that HLX-1 is found at a position where the bulge still influences the velocity dispersion map. This means that either the hypothetical merger was quite minor or that it was coplanar with ESO 243-49 and prograde and hence contributed to the thick disc component.

5. Stellar populations

thumbnail Fig. 5

Top: mass-weighted fitted mean age of the stellar populations. Bottom: mass-weighted fitted mean metallicity of the stellar populations. The solid lines indicate the height above which 82% of the light is emitted by the thick disc according to the fit in Sect. 3. The cross indicates the location of HLX-1.
Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 6

Left: distribution of the mean mass-weighted ages of the thin and thick disc bins (blue and red lines, respectively). Right: distribution of the mean mass-weighted metallicities. The thick disc histograms were multiplied to have the same surface as the thin disc histograms.
Open with DEXTER

We created spacial bins with S/N = 80 to study the stellar populations. We run the Voronoi binning code three times. First we created a series of thin disc dominated bins in the section with heights smaller than 1.6 kpc (; above that height 82% of the light comes from the thick disc according to Sect. 3). Then we created thick disc dominated bins in the regions below (second time) and above (third time) the thin disc dominated area. The total number of bins was 558 (530 for the thin disc and 28 for the thick disc). We then fitted the LOSVD of each of the bins. This time we fitted four momenta (V, σ, and the Hermite momenta h3 and h4). For each of the bins, a subset of the MIUSCAT library was widened by convolving it with the LOSVD; we excluded the templates with metallicities [Z/H] < −1. The widened templates were used to fit the spectra for each of the S/N = 80 spacial bins with STECKMAP (Ocvirk et al. 2006a,b). The fit output was a star formation history (SFH) as well as the mean metallicity for each of the age bins of the SFH. The fit was carried out over the 4750−8800 Å wavelength range. The continuum was modelled with a spline function with 40 equi-spaced nodes.

Both the thin and thick discs have old stellar populations with mean ages in excess of 12 Gyr (Fig. 5). The two components have a similar mean age distribution (Fig. 6). No young stellar populations are found. Only six bins have more than 15% of their light emitted by stars younger than 5 Gyr. On the other hand, there is a significant vertical metallicity gradient with large metallicities in the midplane and lower metallicities in the thick disc. On average, thin disc bins have a slightly super-solar metallicity (peaking at [Z/H] = 0.1), whereas the thick disc has a slightly subsolar metallicity (peaking at [Z/H] = −0.15; Fig. 6). The metal-rich band in the thin disc extends to heights about half of so the PSF contamination of high-metallicity stars in the thick disc bins is likely to be minimal. The trends found here are stable with respect to changes in the fitted wavelength range.

One might wonder whether our results are affected by the feared age-metallicity degeneracy. Using STECKMAP, Sánchez-Blázquez et al. (2011) demonstrated that full spectral fitting techniques greatly reduce the degeneracy compared to what is obtained from the study of spectral indices. According to the plots in their paper they found that for a 10 Gyr population with a solar metallicity the uncertainties are smaller than 1 Gyr in age and about 0.2 dex in metallicity. While this is indicative of the uncertainties due to the age-metallicity degeneracy in our fits, one has to take into account that our fitted wavelength range is not the same as in their study so the above-mentioned values might not strictly apply; they used the 4150−6100 Å range, whereas we use that between 4750 and 8800 Å.

An independent way to check the age uncertainties is to look at the scatter in the fitted age. This can be accomplished because the age map does not show any clear age gradient, so it is reasonable to assume that all the spacial bins have a similar mean age. The standard deviation of the age distribution in Fig. 6 is 1.2 Gyr.

The uncertainties described here apply to relative age and metallicity differences. Indeed, absolute age and metallicity determinations are affected by other uncertainties such those introduced by the choice of a given SED library. This probably explains why we find the discs to be slightly older than the age of the universe in standard cosmology (Fig. 6).

6. Discussion and conclusions

We find that ESO 243-49 has a thick disc with a lag that is compatible with that coming from asymmetric drift. It also has a composite bulge made of a classical bulge with a high velocity dispersion and a nuclear disc. The thick disc is not found to be older than the thin disc, but it is significantly less metallic.

Even though the ages of the thin and thick discs are similar, the higher metallicity of the thin disc indicates a longer evolution that has led to an increased enrichment. The reason why this larger evolution period does not show in the age maps might be that the spectra of old stellar populations evolve little with time. Thus small age differences could be hidden by the uncertainties involved in the fitting process. It seems that the star formation in the thin disc of ESO 243-49 was quenched early on, probably because its presence inside the Abell 2877 cluster. ESO 243-49 might be a prototypical case of a galaxy with a monolithic collapse, where several generations of stars form very quickly one after another.

With this study, we now have the stellar kinematics of nine thick discs in high-mass galaxies. In all cases, the lag of the thick disc is of a few tens of km s-1. Based on our experience while studying ESO 533-4 (Comerón et al. 2015), we estimate that a fraction of 10−20% of counter-rotating stars in the thick disc would cause its rotation curve to lag too much compared to what would be expected from asymmetric drift. Therefore, our results suggest an internal origin for the majority of thick disc stars. The thick disc could have formed quickly and in situ in a turbulent thick star-forming disc (Elmegreen & Elmegreen 2006; Bournaud et al. 2009; Comerón et al. 2014) or with a slightly slower pace due to internal heating (Villumsen 1985) or heating caused by interactions (Quinn et al. 1993). Radial migration of stars could also contribute to the bimodal disc structure. This is because once the guiding centre of a star is modified, the amplitude of its vertical oscillations can change. This last possibility is the focus of a fierce debate (see e.g. Schönrich & Binney 2009a,b; Loebman et al. 2011; Minchev et al. 2012; Roškar et al. 2013; Vera-Ciro et al. 2014; Grand et al. 2016, for different views on this).

The thin/thick disc differentiation should have happened in the first few Gyrs of ESO 243-49, when the galaxy was still forming stars because posterior dynamical heating would tend to erase the metallicity gradients.

Acknowledgments

S.C. and H.S. acknowledge support from the Academy of Finland. We thank Lodovico Coccato for his help in refining the data reduction. We thank Jesús Falcón-Barroso and Inma Martínez-Valpuesta for useful discussions. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This research is partially based on data from the MILES project.

References

  1. Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in SPIE Conf. Ser., 7735, 8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond, N. A., Ivezić, Ž., Sesar, B., et al. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bournaud, F., Elmegreen, B. G., & Martig, M. 2009, ApJ, 707, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burstein, D. 1979, ApJ, 234, 829 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiba, M., & Beers, T. C. 2000, AJ, 119, 2843 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Comerón, S., Elmegreen, B. G., Knapen, J. H., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 741, 28 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Comerón, S., Knapen, J. H., Sheth, K., et al. 2011b, ApJ, 729, 18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Comerón, S., Elmegreen, B. G., Salo, H., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, 98 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Comerón, S., Elmegreen, B. G., Salo, H., et al. 2014, A&A, 571, A58 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Comerón, S., Salo, H., Janz, J., Laurikainen, E., & Yoachim, P. 2015, A&A, 584, A34 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dressler, A. 1980, ApJS, 42, 565 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elmegreen, B. G., & Elmegreen, D. M. 2006, ApJ, 650, 644 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Erwin, P., Saglia, R. P., Fabricius, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 4039 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Falcón-Barroso, J., Bacon, R., Bureau, M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 529 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Farrell, S. A., Webb, N. A., Barret, D., Godet, O., & Rodrigues, J. M. 2009, Nature, 460, 73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Freudling, W., Romaniello, M., Bramich, D. M., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A96 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gilmore, G., & Reid, N. 1983, MNRAS, 202, 1025 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grand, R. J. J., Springel, V., Gómez, F. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guérou, A., Emsellem, E., Krajnović, D., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanuschik, R. W. 2003, A&A, 407, 1157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones, D. H., Read, M. A., Saunders, W., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 683 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kasparova, A. V., Katkov, I. Y., Chilingarian, I. V., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, L89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kordopatis, G., Wyse, R. F. G., Gilmore, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A122 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Loebman, S. R., Roškar, R., Debattista, V. P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mapelli, M., Annibali, F., Zampieri, L., & Soria, R. 2013, A&A, 559, A124 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Minchev, I., Famaey, B., Quillen, A. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A127 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moni Bidin, C., Carraro, G., & Méndez, R. A. 2012, ApJ, 747, 101 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ocvirk, P., Pichon, C., Lançon, A., & Thiébaut, E. 2006a, MNRAS, 365, 74 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ocvirk, P., Pichon, C., Lançon, A., & Thiébaut, E. 2006b, MNRAS, 365, 46 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ojha, D. K., Bienayme, O., Robin, A. C., & Mohan, V. 1994, A&A, 284, 810 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pasetto, S., Grebel, E. K., Zwitter, T., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A70 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Quinn, P. J., Hernquist, L., & Fullagar, D. P. 1993, ApJ, 403, 74 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Read, J. I., Lake, G., Agertz, O., & Debattista, V. P. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1041 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Roškar, R., Debattista, V. P., & Loebman, S. R. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 976 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Salo, H., Laurikainen, E., Laine, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Ocvirk, P., Gibson, B. K., Pérez, I., & Peletier, R. F. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 709 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schönrich, R., & Binney, J. 2009a, MNRAS, 396, 203 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schönrich, R., & Binney, J. 2009b, MNRAS, 399, 1145 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Soto, K. T., Lilly, S. J., Bacon, R., Richard, J., & Conseil, S. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3210 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Soubiran, C., Bienaymé, O., & Siebert, A. 2003, A&A, 398, 141 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Streich, D., de Jong, R. S., Bailin, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A97 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsikoudi, V. 1979, ApJ, 234, 842 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vazdekis, A., Ricciardelli, E., Cenarro, A. J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vera-Ciro, C., D’Onghia, E., Navarro, J., & Abadi, M. 2014, ApJ, 794, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Villumsen, J. V. 1985, ApJ, 290, 75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yoachim, P., & Dalcanton, J. J. 2005, ApJ, 624, 701 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yoachim, P., & Dalcanton, J. J. 2006, AJ, 131, 226 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yoachim, P., & Dalcanton, J. J. 2008, ApJ, 682, 1004 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Vertical surface brightness profile at 3.6 μm for regions between 10 and 30″ from the galaxy centre (large dots). The dotted line denotes the fit to the profile and the dashed lines denote the thin and thick disc contributions. zT and zt indicate the thick and thin disc scale heights. The grey dot-dashed line indicates the limit of the height range over which the fit was made.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Top: image of ESO 243-49 made by collapsing the MUSE data cube along its spectral direction. Middle: radial velocity map. Bottom: velocity dispersion map. The cross some 7″ to the NE of the centre of the galaxy indicates the location of the X-ray source HLX-1 based on the information in Mapelli et al. (2013). The continuous line indicates the midplane and the dashed lines indicate heights of 0.8, 1.6, and 2.4 kpc above and below the midplane.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Velocity curves of ESO 243-49 for different heights above (left) and below the midplane (right).
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Unsharp mask of the central regions of ESO 243-49. The red line indicates the midplane of the galaxy.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Top: mass-weighted fitted mean age of the stellar populations. Bottom: mass-weighted fitted mean metallicity of the stellar populations. The solid lines indicate the height above which 82% of the light is emitted by the thick disc according to the fit in Sect. 3. The cross indicates the location of HLX-1.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Left: distribution of the mean mass-weighted ages of the thin and thick disc bins (blue and red lines, respectively). Right: distribution of the mean mass-weighted metallicities. The thick disc histograms were multiplied to have the same surface as the thin disc histograms.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.