Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 542, June 2012
Article Number A15
Number of page(s) 12
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118683
Published online 25 May 2012

© ESO, 2012

1. Introduction

When a low- or intermediate-mass star has completed its core helium burning, it goes through the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase, which is characterized by heavy mass-loss. Dust formation is very efficient in AGB outflows and about 1–2% of the mass of the envelope is condensed into dust grains. After leaving the AGB, the mass-loss rate drops substantially and the star may become optically visible, as its dusty shell disperses. Eventually, once it reaches a temperature of 20 000–30 000 K, the central star will start to ionize its circumstellar envelope (CSE) and a planetary nebula (PN) will form (Habing 1996). Dusty CSEs re-radiate the absorbed stellar light and show clear signatures in the far-infrared (FIR) spectrum. In particular, a “color–color” diagram introduced by van der Veen & Habing (1988) has permitted a classification of sources to be developed based on the ratios of flux densities measured with the InfraRed Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) .

The heavy mass-loss of AGB stars (with rates of up to several 10-4 M yr-1) is one of the most important pathways for mass return from stars to the interstellar medium (ISM).

After the AGB phase, the star “somehow” develops a less massive (10-7   M yr-1) but faster (up to 10-3 km s-1) wind that sweeps up the circumstellar material, possibly creating shocks and high-density shells. Ultraviolet (UV) photons produced at this higher stellar temperature can excite, ionize, and dissociate molecules, heat the dust, and ionize the gas (when Teff > 20–30 × 103 K).

In the CSEs of many O-rich AGB stars, maser emission is detected from the SiO, H2O, and OH molecules. The conditions for the formation of maser emission from these different molecules are typically met in a progression of zones. The SiO masers arise from the closest regions to the central star, and those of H2O and OH at progressively farther distances. In stars with thicker envelopes, longer periods, and higher mass-loss rates – the so-called OH/IR stars – the spectral profiles of H2O and OH masers are often double-peaked, and the velocity range covered by the OH (10–25 km s-1) is usually larger than that of the H2O feature (Engels 2002). When the mass-loss process ends (i.e., at the end of the AGB) and the circumstellar envelope is progressively diluted, the maser lines may start to disappear. In a spherically symmetric CSE, the SiO lines are the first to vanish, then those of H2O, and finally those of OH (Lewis 1998). Given these considerations, OH/IR stars with detached circumstellar shells, whose presence can be inferred from either doubly or multiply peaked OH-maser spectra with a large velocity spread, are good candidate objects for studying the post-AGB phase.

The members of a small but growing sub-class of water-maser stars have been dubbed “water-fountain” nebulae and show unique spectral and spatial characteristics (Likkel & Morris 1988). The velocity spread of their H2O spectra is very large, up to several 100 km s-1, and frequently larger than that of their OH spectra. High-resolution interferometric observations have shown that their masers are in collimated jets with dynamical ages younger than 150 yr (Boboltz & Marvel 2005). Water-maser post-AGB stars and particularly water fountains represent a very short evolutionary phase right after the end of the AGB; they therefore provide a unique opportunity for studying the physical conditions in the molecular envelopes as the shaping agent begins to act.

One such star is IRAS 15452−5459, which appears to display evidence of SiO, H2O, and OH masers. It was first selected by van der Veen et al. (1989) within a sample of sources detected with IRAS as a candidate star in transition from the AGB to the PN phase. They required that their targets fall within regions IIIb, IV, and V of the van der Veen & Habing IRAS color–color diagram (i.e., an evolutionary sequence from the AGB to the PN), thus be bright at 12 μm (>2 Jy) and have a small IRAS variability index (<50). IRAS 15452−5459 (hereafter I15452) falls within region IV of that diagram, where variable stars with very thick O-rich circumstellar shells are expected. The authors assumed a stellar temperature of 104 K and a luminosity of 1.5 × 104   L, estimating a distance of about 2.5 kpc.

Oudmaijer et al. (1995) performed IR K-band spectral observations and found CO ro-vibrational lines in absorption, which made them conclude that the central star should have a temperature in the range of 3000–5000 K.

This lower stellar temperature appears to be more consistent with the CSE of I15452 indeed hosting masers in all the species typically found in CSEs. The object was included in the survey of OH masers carried out by te Lintel Hekkert et al. (1991), who detected a peculiar OH maser at 1612 MHz with four intensity peaks. The features span roughly −20 to −100 km s-1 and their peaks are found around −83, −67, −47, and −33 km s-1, with a central velocity around −57 km s-1. Subsequent observations with the Australia Telescope Compact Array confirmed the detection of the components at larger velocities and their association with the star (Deacon et al. 2004).

Deacon et al. (2007) detected the H2O maser line at 22 GHz. They found an irregular spectrum with many emission features, covering roughly −30 to −80 km s-1 and pointing to a complex masing region. They carried out three runs of observations over one year and concluded that the spectral features are stable in velocity over a timescale of a few months, but the peak intensity of the individual features and the integrated spectral flux density vary dramatically (~70%). They also report the detection of an SiO maser at 86 GHz with an unusual doubly peaked profile, with features centered on  ~−40 and  ~−75 km s-1. The detection of OH, H2O, and SiO masers and the near-IR CO absorption indicate that the source is an O-rich star that has very recently evolved off the AGB and started its transition across the HR diagram.

2. Observations and results

2.1. IRAS 15452−5459

We observed I15452 with the APEX1 12 m telescope, which is located at an altitude of 5100 m on Llano de Chajnantor, in Chile (Güsten et al. 2006). Observations were performed in both continuum and spectral-line mode, to investigate its CSE dusty and molecular components.

2.1.1. CO observations

The CO observations were carried out on 2009 October 16 and 19. The receivers APEX-2 and FLASH (Riscacher et al. 2006; Heyminck et al. 2006) were used to observe the CO J = 3−2 (345.796 GHz) and J = 4−3 (461.041 GHz) rotational lines, respectively. The fast Fourier transform spectrometer (FFTS) backend available at APEX allows for a spectral coverage of about 1.8 GHz, split up into 8192 channels, which gives velocity resolutions of 0.21 and 0.12 km s-1 at 345 and 460 GHz, respectively (Klein et al. 2006).

Since the source is known from infrared imaging to be extended over about 25′′, we pointed the telescope at three different positions. One pointing was performed at the central coordinates of the source (right ascension 15:49:11.38; declination –55:08:51.6), one was offset by  + 7′′ in both RA and Dec (this is indicated in the following as the north-eastern pointing) and a third pointing was similarly offset by −7′′ (indicated in the following as the south-western pointing); each offset pointing was therefore about 10′′ away from the central coordinates.

The observations were carried out using a position-switching mode, with the reference position located 1° away in azimuth. The data reduction consisted in averaging together the scans performed for each pointing and removing a low-order (≤ 2) polynomial baseline. To enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, the data were smoothed to resolutions of 0.63 km s-1 for the J = 3−2 line and 2.4 km s-1 for the J = 4−3 line. The raw spectra are stored in the scale and can be converted to main-beam brightness temperature using Tmb = , where is the antenna temperature corrected for atmospheric attenuation using the chopper-wheel method, Feff is the telescope forward efficiency (for APEX Feff ~ 0.95 at 345 GHz and 0.97 at 460 GHz), and Beff is the main-beam efficiency, estimated to be 0.73 at 345 GHz and 0.61 at 460 GHz (Güsten et al. 2006). The uncertainty in the absolute intensity scale is estimated to be about  ± 20%. Regular pointing checks were made on strong circumstellar CO sources and typically found to be consistent to within  ~3′′. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the main beam, θmb, is 17.3′′ at 345 GHz and 13.3′′ at 460 GHz. Table 1 summarizes the integration times, system temperatures, and rms noise for each pointing.

Table 1

Summary of the observations of IRAS 15452−5459 performed on 2009 October 16 (J = 3−2) and 2009 October 19 (J = 4−3).

Table 2

Characteristics of CO observations in water fountain sources.

2.1.2. Continuum observations

On 2007 May 28, we observed I15452 with the Large APEX BOlometer CAmera (LABOCA) at 870 μm (345 GHz). LABOCA is an array of 295 bolometers, operating in total-power mode at a temperature of  ~285 mK. The noise-weighted mean point-source sensitivity of the array determined from on-sky integrations is 55 mJy s1/2 per channel (Siringo et al. 2009).

The absolute calibration is achieved by observations of planets, namely Mars, Uranus, and Neptune. The overall calibration accuracy for LABOCA is about 10% (Siringo et al. 2009).

A major issue in performing sub-mm observations is the atmospheric opacity. Two independent methods are typically used to determine the sky opacity at APEX. The first one relies on the measurement of precipitable water vapor performed every minute by the APEX radiometer along the line of sight (Pardo et al. 2001). This approach is limited by the knowledge of the passband, the applicability of the atmospheric model, and the accuracy of the radiometer. The second method uses skydips, i.e. measurements of the power of the atmospheric emission as a function of the airmass. The values of the sky opacity resulting from the skydip analysis are robust, though up to  ~30% larger than those obtained by the radiometer. This systematic difference is not well-understood, therefore to reconcile the results obtained with the two methods, a linear combination of radiometer and skydip values was used, so as to obtain the most consistent calibrator fluxes at all elevations, as indicated by Siringo et al. (2009).

The observations were carried out in raster-spiral mapping mode. In the basic spiral mode, spiral scans are performed at a constant angular speed and an increasing radius around the pointing position, producing fully sampled maps of the whole field of view. These spirals are the preferred observing mode for sources brighter than a few Jy. For fainter sources, the basic spiral pattern can be combined with a raster mapping mode (raster-spirals) on a grid of pointing positions resulting in a denser sampling of the maps and a longer integration time (Siringo et al. 2009).

The data reduction was performed with the Bolometer array data Analysis (BoA) software, specifically developed for APEX bolometer data. BoA allows the observer to perform all of the necessary reduction steps: opacity correction, flux calibration, bad channel flagging, removal of correlated noise, despiking, data weighting, creation of a map, and image analysis (Siringo et al. 2009).

The nebula shows a flux density at 345 GHz of 260    ±    40 mJy, where the error includes the rms noise and the absolute calibration uncertainty.

2.2. CO in water-maser stars

Using the APEX telescope, we made an attempt to find CO rotational emission in six selected objects known to host high-velocity water masers, such as I15452. The sample included four water-fountain nebulae toward which no CO emission had previously been reported. All targets are listed in Table 2. The six sources were observed in the CO(2−1) transitions with the APEX-1 receiver, five of those were also observed in the CO(3−2) transitions with the APEX-2 receiver, and two of them were also observed with the CHAMP+ array (Kasemann et al. 2006) producing spectra centered on the CO(6−5) and (7−6) lines. The observing dates and noise levels are given in Table 2. The telescope beam widths and main beam efficiencies at the observed frequencies are given in Table 3. As a back-end, we used the digital FFTS, which provided spectra at resolutions between 0.2–0.6 km s-1 and bandwidths of at least several hundred km s-1.

The stars were selected from currently available maser surveys (Deacon et al. 2004; Deacon et al. 2007) as those that have both doubly peaked maser profiles with velocities larger than typical AGB values (10–25 km s-1) and IRAS colors typical of post-AGB stars, and that are observable from the APEX site. All of them host H2O masers and are assumed to have just reached their post-AGB evolution. Imai et al. (2009) observed 9 of the 13 water fountains currently known in the CO J = 3−2 line with the Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment (ASTE). Their rms noise ranged from 4 to 62 mK and they detected the line in two targets. In our selection, we excluded the water fountains observed by Imai et al. (2009) and included the newly discovered water fountain IRAS 19190 + 1102 (Day et al. 2010). This leaves us with four water fountains and an additional two stars with water masers.

Table 3

Telescope specifications for the observed frequencies.

The observations in the CO(2−1) and CO(3−2) lines were obtained in position switching (total power) mode. Many of the sources that we observed are located close to the Galactic plane, therefore their reference positions were chosen 1–3° away from the Galactic plane, to avoid emission at the OFF positions. All the observed lines of sight cross interstellar molecular clouds, which give rise to prominent emission features that are particularly strong in the CO(2−1) line. For all sources other than OH 12.8−0.9, these interstellar emission features occur in the range of velocities where the maser emission is observed. This strongly hampers the identification of any potentially existing CO emission from the circumstellar material in our objects. For a majority of the objects, strong interstellar lines overlap in spectral regions close to the expected source velocity. For IRAS 18103−1738, we find one feature that is centered on the stellar velocity, when we compare the CO and OH maser spectra (Fig. 1), but the CO feature may be of interstellar origin. In the case of two other objects, IRAS 18043−2116 and IRAS 18327−0715, we found relatively weak emission features that appear close to the expected central velocities, i.e. at 38 km s-1 and 87 km s-1 for IRAS 18043−2116 and IRAS 18327−0715, respectively (Fig. 1). These emission features are candidates for the circumstellar emission but their interstellar origin cannot be excluded without careful imaging observations and accurate positions. For these two sources, we obtained deep integrations in the CO(6−5) line (simultaneously with a spectrum in the CO(7−6) line). In these high rotational transitions, the contamination from interstellar clouds of low excitation should be negligible and the circumstellar gas can be identified more easily when excited to high J levels. In both cases, the spectra do not show any emission in CO(6−5) nor in (7−6) at the noise levels given in Table 2. Our search for CO emission in these sources is therefore inconclusive.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Overlay of OH maser features on our CO spectra for targets with maser data available through on-line archives. The maser data are from Sevenster (2002) and available through VizieR (Ochsenbein et al. 2000, http://vizier.u-trasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR).

In the case of OH 12.8−0.9, the maser features appear in a velocity range that is not contaminated by strong interstellar CO emission. We detected weak and relatively broad emission features in CO(2−1) and (3−2) lines covering the same velocity range as the maser peaks of H2O and OH, i.e. between −70 and −35 km s-1 (Boboltz & Marvel 2005). The detection is marginal, but the feature clearly appears above the 3σ noise level after smoothing the spectra to a resolution of 5–6 km s-1, as can be seen in Fig. 2. That it appears in both lines and the good match with the maser velocities both support the detection, although more sensitive observations are desirable.

thumbnail Fig. 2

CO spectrum observed toward OH 12.8−0.9. In the bottom, the overlay of the smoothed spectrum and the OH maser spectrum is shown, as in Fig. 1.

3. IRAS 15452−5459: CO spectra

We obtained three spectra corresponding to the central-star coordinates derived from observations performed with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and two positions that had been offset 7′′ from the central star position in both right ascension and declination. These are shown in Fig. 3.

The spectra corresponding to the central pointing appear as a superposition of at least two components: a broad feature and a narrow one. The broad feature seems to show an asymmetric profile, its red side being relatively abruptly cut off. Such a shape is likely due to an absorption feature around −20 km s-1 clearly detected in the offset pointings, which is probably masking the line profile. The absorption was already noticed in the OH maser spectra by Deacon et al. (2004), who also pointed out that a similar feature is present around −55 km s-1. These are likely spurious features due to the ISM emission in the off-source position. In Fig. 4, we compare the CO features with the OH maser spectrum published by Deacon et al. (2004) and note that the wide CO component extends over a much larger velocity range than the maser features. This broad component is not detected in the offset pointings, which indicates that the part of the outflow from which this feature originates is located in the inner region of the CSE. This is confirmed by the detection of the broad feature at all pointings in the J = 4−3 line, which is a more robust tracer of the inner region than the J = 3−2.

In the J = 3−2 offset pointings, we detected only a central, strongly asymmetric double-horn component, whose red feature is much weaker than the blue one. At a close inspection, the spectral structure has more of a four-peak feature, resembling an optically thin, resolved double-shell.

3.1. Kinematical components

The data acquired northeast (NE) and southwest (SW) of the central star are characterized by a double-peak structure. The double-peak substructure of the blue peak is also easily seen in the SW pointing. An analogous substructure is probably responsible for the shape of the red peak. This closely resembles what is observed in the OH maser observations, where two features centered on  ~−57 km s-1 also display multi-peak substructures.

By fitting Gaussians to the peaks, we derive for the NE feature a central velocity of −57.5 km s-1 and a velocity width (FWHM) of 27.4 km s-1, while for the SW feature we obtain −55.5 and 28.6 km s-1, respectively.

As can be seen in Fig. 4, the narrow peaks match very well with the velocity ranges of the two central features observed in the OH maser spectrum by Deacon et al. (2004). They are also centered on the velocity accredited to the central star from the analysis of the OH maser lines. In spite of this, these narrow features cannot be conclusively distinguished from ISM contamination without carefully mapping the area around our target.

On the contrary, the broad component detected in the central pointing can certainly be attributed to I15452. We fit this component with a function of the form (1)and null elsewhere. As a central velocity Vc, we assume −57.5 km s-1 and find that  K and Ve = 45.0 km s-1.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Circles as wide as the APEX beam at 345 GHz are centered on our pointing coordinates: a white circle indicates the central pointing and two green circles indicate the two pointings 10′′ offset. The I-band background image of I15452 was retrieved from the HST archive (north up and east left). Red bars indicate the spectra obtained for the J = 3−2 CO line and blue bars those for the J = 4−3 line.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Overlay of our CO J = 3−2 data and OH 1612 MHz (Deacon et al. 2004) lines for IRAS 15452−5459. The offsets from the central position in (RA, Dec) for the northeast and southwest pointings were (7, 7) and (− 7, −7), respectively.

3.2. Mass-loss rate

We do not have observations of 13CO lines that would allow us to estimate the optical depth of the 12CO lines. We can derive the mass-loss rate associated with the outflow generating the broad component, from the correlation between this parameter and the Tmb at the center of the line.

For a spherically symmetric envelope,if we assume that its emission is optically thin, we can estimate the mass-loss rate from Knapp & Morris (1985) and Oloffson et al. (1993) as (2)where Tmb is the line peak main-beam temperature in K, W is the ratio of the flux emitted by the target at 4.6 μm to that emitted by a star at the same distance with radius 5 × 1013 cm approximated by a Planck curve at 2000 K, s(J) is a correction factor to account for the specific J → J − 1 transition, fCO is the abundance of CO relative to H2, Vexp the expansion velocity of the outflow in km s-1, D the distance to the star in pc, and θ the beam size in arcsec.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Spectra of the J = 3−2 line observed 10′′ northeast of the central source in IRAS 15452−5459 (top), on the central source (center) and 10′′ southwest of the central position (bottom). Overplotted in red are Gaussian fittings to the narrow features and a parabola for the broad component in the central pointing.

From our fitting to the component, we derive Tmb = 0.8 K and vexp = 45 km s-1. To estimate the W parameter, we perform synthetic photometry from the observed ISO spectrum of the source and calculate the IRAC 4.5 μm flux density with the Spitzer data reduction package SMART2 (Higdon et al. 2004), obtaining 11.38 Jy (the source is included in the GLIMPSE survey (Churchwell et al. 2009), but its photometry at 4.5 μm is unavailable from the on-line GLIMPSE catalog, probably because of saturation). We thus obtain W = 0.75. The correction factor s(3) is taken as 0.43, following Groenewegen et al. (1999) and fCO = 3 × 10-4, which is typical of O-rich circumstellar envelopes. Finally, the distance is set to 2.5 kpc and the beam is 17.3′′. The derived mass-loss rate is 1.2 × 10-4 M yr-1.

Under the assumption of an optically thick line, the mass-loss rate can be estimated as (Groenewegen et al. 1999) (3)which returns a value of 4.9 × 10-4 M yr-1. In both cases, we obtain quite high values, but the calculations assume spherical symmetry, hence probably lead to overestimates.

By continuing to distinguish between the optically thin and thick regimes, we can calculate the mass of molecular gas corresponding to each spectral component. The H2 masses were derived by integrating over the whole spectrum the formula for the ith channel (4)where the CO column density is given by Choi et al. (1993) as (5)D(n,TK) was shown to be equal to 1.5 to within a factor of 2 in the range 10 < TK < 200 K and 104 < n < 106 cm-3, mH2 is the mass of a molecule of hydrogen, D the distance to the star in cm, and Ω the beam in sr. In Table 4, we list values for τ32 ≪ 1 and for τ = 5 as a fiducial for the optically thick case, when indeed the mass depends on the real value of τ. We also calculated the energy and momentum associated with the outflow along the line of sight by integrating Pi = Mi|vi − v0| over the spectrum (the central velocity v0 is −57.5 km s-1) and then .

The values of momentum and energy can be compared with those found by Bujarrabal et al. (2001). They found that most of the standard proto-PNe have outflows with kinetic energies in the range 1044–1046 erg, with low-mass stars and hypergiants, respectively, below and above this range. Depending on the opacity of the features observed, we find in the molecular envelope around I15452 kinetic energies in the range 1042–1044 erg, which would then imply its classification as a low-mass star.

Bujarrabal et al. (2001) also find that if the origin of the outflow is radiation pressure on grains, an upper limit to the scalar momentum is given by P ≲ L/c (g cm s-1 yr-1)    × 2000 (yr). For our source, L/c = 3.24 × 1034 g cm s-1 yr-1, therefore the upper limit to P is 6.48 × 1036 g cm s-1. We obtain for the momentum 6.96 × 1036 g cm s-1 under the optically thin assumption. Even in this conservative case, the momentum is larger than can be accounted for by the radiation: the action of radiation on grains is unable to explain the outflow we observe in our target, as already found by Bujarrabal et al. (2001) for many proto-PNe.

thumbnail Fig. 6

Top: the two CO lines detected are plotted on each other, after resampling the spectra at a resolution of 2.5 km s-1. Bottom: the ratio of the two lines is shown for points where the emission from both lines is above their respective noises.

4. IRAS 15452−5459: IR archive observations

The star was imaged with the HST at optical (V) and near-IR (I, J, H, and K) wavelengths by Sahai et al. (2007). The V-band images do not show any nebulosity and only the central star is weakly detected. The nebula becomes brighter at longer wavelengths, exhibiting an hourglass shape (~25′′), as described by Sahai et al. (2007), to which we refer for a morphological description.

Table 4

Physical parameters derived for the outflow from the J = 3−2 line.

4.1. The ISO spectrum

I15452 was observed with the Short and Long Wavelength Spectrometers on-board the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO). Its IR spectrum was presented by García-Lario et al. (2000), who reported the detection of the mid-IR features attributed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at 6.2, 7.7, and 8.6 μm, a plateau between 10 and 15 μm also attributed to PAHs, and the 30   μm feature due to MgS. All of these features are typical of C-rich environments. The presence of both PAH features and the masers would make this object a member of the rare class of mixed-chemistry sources, whose nature is not well-understood. These may be stars that have changed their chemistry from O-rich into C-rich and during the transition have the properties of both CSEs, or they may host structures that retain the O-rich material, despite the chemical change that occurs in the overall CSE. Another option is that photodissociation makes atomic C and O available for reaction and both O-bearing and C-bearing chemical species are then found in the CSE (Little-Marenin 1986).

The spectrum also contains several atomic forbidden emission lines of [OIII], [NIII], [NII], [CII], and [OI], which are typical of photodissociation regions (PDRs), but the continuum is clearly contaminated by spurious emission that can be attributed to Galactic cirrus. We retrieved the highly processed data set from the ISO web archive and in Table 5 we list the lines detected in the spectrum, their widths, and their fluxes.

Table 5

Atomic lines detected in the ISO spectrum of I15452.

As can be seen in Fig. 7, the area where the source is located is rich in molecular gas and dust, and, since a background spectrum is unavailable, it cannot be ruled out that this diffuse gas affects or is responsible for the spectral features observed, keeping in mind that the FWHM of the ISO beam was  ~1.5′′–93′′ in the 2–245 μm range.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Spitzer composite of the region around I15452 from the GLIMPSE and MIPSGAL archives. Images at 5.8, 8.0, and 24 μm are coded on a logarithmic scale as blue, green, and red, respectively. The image covers an area about 24′ × 19′ wide. North is up and east left.

4.2. PDR lines and circumstellar radiation field

In a study of FIR PDR lines in AGB stars, proto-PNe, and PNe, Fong et al. (2001) and Castro-Carrizo et al. (2001) note that the detection of PDR lines depends mostly on the temperature of the central star, and that shocks, massive outflows, and the interstellar radiation field do not seem to play a role. On the basis of their observations, they distinguished circumstellar from interstellar PDRs by the flux ratio of the  [CII]  (158 μm) to  [OI]  (63 μm) lines. These authors observed that the former is always less intense than the latter, when both lines are clearly attributed to a circumstellar PDR. This clear attribution was impossible for their coldest sources, for which background spectra indicated interstellar contamination. This can bias the conclusion that in circumstellar PDRs I[CII] can be expected to be weaker than I[OI].

To characterize the average radiation field around the star, we can introduce the parameter G, the intensity of the UV radiation field in Habing units (Castro-Carrizo et al. 2001) (6)where L is the stellar luminosity, FUV the fraction of energy at energies higher than 6 eV (~2066 Å) in a blackbody spectrum at the same temperature as the star, Ri is the inner radius from the star to the PDR, and G0 = 1.6 × 10-3 erg cm-2 s-1 is the average UV flux in the diffuse ISM.

The ratio of the intensities of the  [CII]  (158 μm) to  [OI]  (63 μm) lines depends on the physical conditions in the PDR and the  [CII]  line is known to be the dominating coolant for average radiation fields with G ≲ 103, while the  [OI]  dominates at higher values of G. Therefore, although contamination is certainly possible, the atomic lines observed in the ISO spectrum of I15452 may indeed arise in a circumstellar PDR with a weak average radiation field.

We can calculate the expected value of G for a star like I15452. The estimation of Ri can be done by SED modeling, taking as Ri the inner radius of the dust shell. To model the SED, we collected photometric data from several catalogs and used the code DUSTY (Ivezic et al. 1999) to solve the equation of radiation transfer in the circumstellar dust shell. DUSTY only considers spherical symmetry, which is clearly not our case, but it can still provide us with an approximate estimate of the inner radius. In Table 6, we listed the data collected from on-line catalogs, namely USNOB1, 2MASS, GLIMPSE, WISE, AKARI, and IRAS, which are shown in Fig. 8.

Table 6

Photometric data on I15452 collected from on-line catalogs.

thumbnail Fig. 8

SED of I15452 with the ISO spectrum shown in red and the DUSTY model as a black solid line. The data from Table 6 and our measurement at 345 GHz (870 μm) are shown as solid circles.

We ran our model with T   = 3500 K, standard density distribution of r-2, grain size distribution with a minimum radius amin = 0.005 and a maximum one amax = 0.25 μm varying as a-0.35 and optical constants for amorphous silicates (appropriate for O-rich environments). With the exception of the mid-IR range, where the excess of emission can be regarded as an indication of a disk, a good fit to the observational data could be obtained for a distance of 2.5 kpc, a luminosity of 8000 L, and a circumstellar absorption AV = 58 (τ ~ 1 around 3.35 μm).

From our DUSTY modeling, we can estimate a FIR continuum flux of 1.7 × 10-11 W m-2 and an inner radius of 5.7 × 1015 cm. Therefore, we find G ~ 170, with FUV = 3.4 × 10-6, where I15452 seems then to fall within the regime where the  [CII]  line is the dominant coolant.

To estimate the intensity of the FUV field and the density in the PDR, we use the models described in Kaufman et al. (2006)3. For a given set of gas-phase elemental abundances and grain properties, each model is described by a constant H nucleus density, n, and incident far-ultraviolet intensity G. The models solve for the equilibrium chemistry, thermal balance, and radiation transfer through a PDR layer. The values of nH, and G are obtained by overlaying two sets of contour plots and finding the intersection of the observations. The procedure requires either two sets of line-intensity ratios or one set of line-intensity ratios and the ratio of the  [CII]  +  [OI]  intensity to that of the FIR dust continuum emission. The abundances used in the calculation were  [C/H]  = 1.4 × 10-4,  [O/H]  = 3 × 10-4,  [Si/H]  = 1.7 × 10-6,  [S/H]  = 2.8 × 10-5,  [Fe/H]  = 1.7 × 10-7,  [Mg/H]  = 1.1 × 10-6, and  [PAH/H]  = 4 × 10-7.

Either a filling-factor correction should be applied to each line or line intensities should be used, as lines of different species do not necessarily arise from the same regions. For example, diffuse  [CII]  emission may fill the observing beam, whereas  [OI]  emission may arise from a smaller region of a higher density and temperature. A similar correction should also be applied to the FIR continuum.

In Fig. 9, we show contour plots for the ratios of the sum of the two PDR lines to the FIR continuum as a function of G and n, obtained from the PDR modeling.

thumbnail Fig. 9

Contour plots of the ratio of the intensity of the  [CII]  line plus that of the  [OI]  line over the FIR continuum as a function of the intensity of the FUV field G and the atomic H density n. The dashed contour corresponds to the value of 0.0037 found for I15452 and the solid circle corresponds to G = 170 and n = 117.

In the rough assumption that all of the emitting components arise from regions with similar sizes, we have (I [OI]  + I [CII] )/IFIR ~ 0.0037. For our calculated value of G, this corresponds in Fig. 9 to a density of 117 cm-3. This density value is somewhat low for a post-AGB CSE, but may be found in the tenuous region where the fast wind has swept away most of the material.

4.3. Envelope mass

We can derive the mass of dust by simply fitting a modified blackbody to the observational data beyond 20 μm, neglecting the IRAS point at 100 μm, because it is clearly contaminated. This procedure provides us with an average dust temperature Td and a dust emissivity index β that can be used to calculate the mass of the dust following Beuther et al (2005)(7)Eq. (7) assumes an average grain size of 0.1 μm and a grain density of 3 g cm-3, where h and k are the Planck and Boltzmann constants, D is the distance to the star (2.5 kpc), and Fν the flux density measured at the frequency ν, which in our case is that of our LABOCA measurement, 345 GHz.

The fit to the FIR/sub-mm observational points gives us values of Td ~ 95 ± 9 K and β ~ 1.10 ± 0.14, which allows us to calculate a CSE dust mass of 0.010    ±    0.003 M. The uncertainties listed are the statistical errors resulting from the fitting procedure and the error propagation in Eq. (7).

Castro-Carrizo et al. (2001) derived a formula to estimate the mass of atomic gas from the flux observed in the  [CII]  line at 157.8 μm, which we report to be (8)where F [CII]  is the observed flux in the  [CII]  line, D the distance to the star, XC the abundance of C (1.5    ×    10-3 for C-rich stars and 2    ×    10-4 for O-rich sources), and Fc is a correction factor that accounts for low excitation temperatures. The correction factor is always  ≥1 and depends on the density and kinetic temperature of the gas, although at the densities found in proto-PNe it is unlikely to be larger than two or three.

From Eq. (8), we can then calculate the mass of atomic gas in the nebula around I15452 to be about 1.9 MD(kpc)2, assuming Fc = 1. We note that I15452 appears to be surrounded by a massive CSE, which still assuming Fc = 1, would contain about 12 M of gas, at the distance of 2.5 kpc. A statistical error in the mass estimate may be calculated from the error in the flux of the  [CII]  line, but this would not account for the real uncertainty in the mass, which is much larger and due to the degree of contamination. The high value of mass found is beyond those expected from intermediate-mass stars and contrasts with the small momentum found above for the molecular component, which is considered as an indication that the source is a low-mass star. Such a high estimate of the circumstellar atomic mass can be regarded as an indication of the ISM contamination of the FIR spectrum.

For a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 200 – a standard value in evolved stars – our dust mass estimate implies a gas mass of about 2 M. Contamination would then enhance the flux in the  [CII]  line by a factor of six.

5. Discussion and conclusions

We have observed a sample of stars where the detection of maser velocities larger than observed on the AGB indicates that these sources have started their post-AGB evolution. In particular, we have included four of the water-fountain nebulae known that were not previously investigated for CO emission. As our targets are located in the Galactic plane, spurious emission from the interstellar medium typically contaminates the spectra and does not allow us to obtain conclusive detections. By comparing the maser features with the CO lines, we find hints of possible CO detections, but only with sensitive maps of the regions around the targets can a distinction between ISM and circumstellar CO be made.

Only IRAS 15452−5459 is clearly detected in both the J = 3−2 and J = 4−3 lines. The star shows in its central region a fast CO outflow with velocities of about Vexp = 45 km s-1, while narrow peaks are indicative of an expansion velocity of  ~14 km s-1. The latter falls within the range of velocities observed during the AGB and, as it is detected at all pointings, it can be interpreted as the result of the remnant AGB wind. With its four peaks, the CO feature resembles those observed in the OH maser and points to a complex emitting structure, rather than an expanding spherical envelope. The broad component observed only in the central region of the source points instead to an outflow of molecular gas. Only interferometric observations can estimate whether this outflow is in the form of a collimated wind. The mass-loss rate calculated for this component is quite high (~10-4 M yr-1) but the assumed spherical symmetry implies that the value is likely overestimated. We have also calculated the scalar momentum and kinetic energy associated with the outflowing material, which we have compared with the results obtained by Bujarrabal et al. (2001), concluding that radiation pressure on dust grains alone cannot explain the dynamics of the CSE.

By fitting a modified blackbody to the FIR/sub-mm observational points of I15452, we have estimated a dust mass in its CSE of  ~0.01 M, while through the analysis of its ISO spectrum, we have calculated an envelope gas mass of about 12 M. The uncertainty in the latter value is dominated by the degree of contamination of the  [CII]  line. The derived values of gas and dust masses (12 and 2 M, respectively) indicate an enhancement factor of six in the line flux because of contamination, if we assume a standard value of 200 for the gas-to-dust mass ratio.

Nevertheless, the total CSE mass of I15452 may be higher than 2 M and the gas-to-dust mass ratio might also be higher than its standard value. I15452 belongs to a group of OH masing stars classified by Sevenster (2002) as LI, because they lie on the left of the evolutionary sequence on the IRAS color–color diagram, while “standard” post-AGB stars lie on the right side (RI sources). LI stars have higher outflow velocities and mass-loss rates and they may loop back to the left of the evolutionary sequence because of an early AGB termination, which would also cause them to host OH masers for a much longer time than RI stars (Sevenster 2002). Finally, by scale height considerations, Sevenster (2002) argue that LI stars may be the precursors of bipolar planetary nebulae and have higher masses than RI sources (ending in elliptical planetary nebulae), with average values of 4 and 1.7 M for LI and RI, respectively (Deacon et al. 2007). The bipolarity of the nebula around I15452 has indeed been proven by Hubble images. For this star to have a CSE mass within values adequate for LI sources (a minimum of 3–4 M), its gas-to-dust mass ratio must be at least 300–400, based on our dust mass estimate. This would decrease the degree of contamination of the  [CII]  line mentioned above to a factor of 3–4.

I15452 is certainly a peculiar object from many points of view. For example, the four peaks seen in its satellite OH line are almost unique among the several hundreds of evolved stars where this feature has been detected. Another target with such a profile of its OH maser is OH 19.2−1.0, in which the spectral shape of the features shows a smaller degree of symmetry than that in I15452. The four peaks in I15452 are stunningly similar to one of the profiles derived theoretically by Grinin & Grigor’ev (1983) for an unsaturated maser originating from a rotating and expanding disk. As pointed out by Chapman (1988) for OH 19.2−0.1, the applicability of the calculations by Grinin & Grigor’ev (1983) to an evolved star is dubious, because OH masers in these sources are typically saturated. Nevertheless, the mid-IR excess of its SED and the mixed chemistry may actually point to the existence of a disk in I15452. The detection of the PAH features in a region of the ISO spectrum that does not appear to be affected by ISM contamination and the presence of O-bearing molecules can in fact be explained by a circumstellar disk. This disk would serve as a reservoir of O-rich material, where the masers would arise, while the PAHs would be located in the circumstellar envelope, which would be converted into C-rich material by the third dredge-up.

We would require a high angular-resolution mid-IR spectrum, in addition to high angular-resolution observations of both the masers and the CO outflow to reconstruct the morphology of the central emitting region in I15452.


1

This publication is based on data acquired with the Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment (APEX). APEX is a collaboration between the Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, the European Southern Observatory, and the Onsala Space Observatory.

2

SMART was developed by the IRS Team at Cornell University and is available through the Spitzer Science Center at Caltech.

3

The models are available on-line at http://dustem.astro.umd.edu/.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our referee, Dr Jessica Chapman, for comments that helped to improve this paper. This research has made use of the VizieR catalog access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France. This research has made use of the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

References

  1. Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Menten, K. M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 535 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boboltz, D. A., & Marvel, K. B. 2005, ApJ, 627, L45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bujarrabal, V., Castro-Carrizo, A., Alcolea, J., & Sánchez-Contreras, C. 2001, A&A, 377, 868 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carey, S., Noriega-Crespo, A., Mizuno, D. R., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 76 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Castro-Carrizo, A., Bujarrabal, V., Fong, D., et al. 2001, A&A, 367, 674 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cerrigone, L., Hora, J. L., Umana, G., & Trigilio, C. 2009, ApJ, 703, 585 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman, J. 1988, MNRAS, 230, 415 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi, M., Evans, N. J., & Jaffe, D. T. 1993, ApJ, 417, 624 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Churchwell, Ed, Babler, Brian L., Meade, Marilyn, R., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 213 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Day, F. M., Pihlströ, Y. M., Claussen, M. J., & Sahai, R. 2010, ApJ, 713, 986 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Deacon, R. M., Chapman, J. M., & Green, A. J. 2004, ApJS, 155, 595 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deacon, R. M., Chapman, J. M., Green, A. J., & Sevenster, M. N. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1096 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Engels, D. 2002, A&A, 388, 252 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fong, D., Meixner, M., Castro-Carrizo, A., et al. 2001, A&A, 367, 652 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. García-Lario, P., Manchado Torres, A., Ulla, A., Manteiga, M., & Suárez Fernandez, O. 2000 ASPC, 199, 391 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gómez, Y., Rodríguez, L. F., Contreras, M. E., & Moran, J. M. 1994, RMA&A, 28, 97 [Google Scholar]
  17. Grinin, V. P., & Grigor’ev, S. A. 1983, Astron. Zh., 60, 512 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  18. Groenewegen, M. A. T., Baas, F., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., et al. 1999, A&AS, 140, 197 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. Güsten, R., Nyman, L. Å., Schilke, P., et al. 2006 A&A, 454, L13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Habing, H. J. 1996, A&ARv, 7, 97 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. He, J. H., Imai, H., Hasegawa, T. I., Campbell, S. W., & Nakashima, J. 2008, A&A, 488, L21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Heyminck, S., Kasemann, C., Güsten, R., de Lange, G., & Graf, U. U. 2006, A&A, 454, L21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Higdon, S. J. U., Devost, D., Higdon, J. L., et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 975 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Imai, H., He, J.-H., Nakashima, J.-I., et al. 2009, PASJ, 61, 1365 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ivezic, Z., Nenkova, M., & Elitzur, M. 1999, User Manual for DUSTY, University of Kentucky Internal Report, accessible at http://www.pa.uky.edu/~moshe/dusty [Google Scholar]
  26. Kasemann, C., Güsten, R., Heyminck, S., et al. 2006, in SPIE Conf. Ser., 6275, 62750N [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., & Hollenbach, D. J. 2006, ApJ, 644, 283 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Klein, B., Philipp, S. D., Krämer, I., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, L29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Knapp, G. M., & Morris, M. 1985, ApJ, 292, 640 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Likkel, L., & Morris, M. 1988, ApJ, 329, 914 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. te Lintel Hekkert, P., Caswell, J. L., Habing, H. J., et al. 1991, A&AS, 90, 327 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  32. Little-Marenin, I. R. 1986, ApJ, 307, L15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 221 [Google Scholar]
  34. Olofsson, H., Eriksson, K., Gustafsson, B., & Carlstrom, U. 1993, ApJS, 87, 267 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Oudmaijer, R. D., Waters, L. B. F. M., van der Veen, W. E. C. J., & Geballe, T. R. 1995, A&A, 299, 690 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pardo, J. R., Cernicharo, J., & Serabyn, E. 2001, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 49, 1683 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramstedt, S., Schöier, F. L., Olofsson, H., & Lundgren, A. A. 2008, A&A, 487, 645 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Risacher, C., Vassilev, V., Monje, R., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, L17 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sahai, R., Morris, M., Sánchez Contreras, C., & Claussen, M. 2007, AJ, 134, 2200 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sevenster, M. N. 2002, AJ, 123, 2772 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Siringo, G., Kreysa, E., Kovács, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 497, 945 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Urquhart, J. S., Busfield, A. L., Hoare, M. G., et al. 2007, A&A, 474, 891 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. van der Veen, W. E. C. J., & Habing, H. J. 1988, A&A, 194, 125 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  44. van der Veen, W. E. C. J., Habing, H. J., & Geballe, T. R. 1989, A&A, 226, 108 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  45. Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1 [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Summary of the observations of IRAS 15452−5459 performed on 2009 October 16 (J = 3−2) and 2009 October 19 (J = 4−3).

Table 2

Characteristics of CO observations in water fountain sources.

Table 3

Telescope specifications for the observed frequencies.

Table 4

Physical parameters derived for the outflow from the J = 3−2 line.

Table 5

Atomic lines detected in the ISO spectrum of I15452.

Table 6

Photometric data on I15452 collected from on-line catalogs.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Overlay of OH maser features on our CO spectra for targets with maser data available through on-line archives. The maser data are from Sevenster (2002) and available through VizieR (Ochsenbein et al. 2000, http://vizier.u-trasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

CO spectrum observed toward OH 12.8−0.9. In the bottom, the overlay of the smoothed spectrum and the OH maser spectrum is shown, as in Fig. 1.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Circles as wide as the APEX beam at 345 GHz are centered on our pointing coordinates: a white circle indicates the central pointing and two green circles indicate the two pointings 10′′ offset. The I-band background image of I15452 was retrieved from the HST archive (north up and east left). Red bars indicate the spectra obtained for the J = 3−2 CO line and blue bars those for the J = 4−3 line.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Overlay of our CO J = 3−2 data and OH 1612 MHz (Deacon et al. 2004) lines for IRAS 15452−5459. The offsets from the central position in (RA, Dec) for the northeast and southwest pointings were (7, 7) and (− 7, −7), respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Spectra of the J = 3−2 line observed 10′′ northeast of the central source in IRAS 15452−5459 (top), on the central source (center) and 10′′ southwest of the central position (bottom). Overplotted in red are Gaussian fittings to the narrow features and a parabola for the broad component in the central pointing.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Top: the two CO lines detected are plotted on each other, after resampling the spectra at a resolution of 2.5 km s-1. Bottom: the ratio of the two lines is shown for points where the emission from both lines is above their respective noises.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Spitzer composite of the region around I15452 from the GLIMPSE and MIPSGAL archives. Images at 5.8, 8.0, and 24 μm are coded on a logarithmic scale as blue, green, and red, respectively. The image covers an area about 24′ × 19′ wide. North is up and east left.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

SED of I15452 with the ISO spectrum shown in red and the DUSTY model as a black solid line. The data from Table 6 and our measurement at 345 GHz (870 μm) are shown as solid circles.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Contour plots of the ratio of the intensity of the  [CII]  line plus that of the  [OI]  line over the FIR continuum as a function of the intensity of the FUV field G and the atomic H density n. The dashed contour corresponds to the value of 0.0037 found for I15452 and the solid circle corresponds to G = 170 and n = 117.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.