Issue 
A&A
Volume 534, October 2011



Article Number  A6  
Number of page(s)  14  
Section  Stellar structure and evolution  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201116620  
Published online  20 September 2011 
Asteroseismology from multimonth Kepler photometry: the evolved Sunlike stars KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273
^{1}
Centro de Astrofísica, DFAFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150762 Porto, Portugal
email: campante@astro.up.pt
^{2}
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
email: campante@phys.au.dk
^{3}
High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307, USA
^{4}
Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Université Paris XI – CNRS (UMR8617), Bâtiment 121, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
^{5} Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA), School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
^{6}
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
^{7}
Laboratoire AIM, CEA/DSMCNRSUniversité Paris Diderot, IRFU/SAp, Centre de Saclay, 91191 GifsurYvette, France
^{8}
LESIA, CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Paris Diderot, Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France
^{9}
INAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy
^{10}
Materials Engineering Research Institute, Faculty of Arts, Computing, Engineering and Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
^{11}
Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
^{12}
Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
^{13}
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
^{14}
Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
^{15}
Australian Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping NSW 1710, Australia
^{16}
Institute of Astronomy, University of Vienna, 1180 Vienna, Austria
^{17}
Astronomical Institute, University of Wrocław, ul. Kopernika 11, 51622 Wrocław, Poland
^{18}
SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
^{19}
Orbital Sciences Corporation/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
Received: 1 February 2011
Accepted: 16 August 2011
Context. The evolved mainsequence Sunlike stars KIC 10273246 (Ftype) and KIC 10920273 (Gtype) were observed with the NASA Kepler satellite for approximately ten months with a duty cycle in excess of 90%. Such continuous and long observations are unprecedented for solartype stars other than the Sun.
Aims. We aimed mainly at extracting estimates of pmode frequencies – as well as of other individual mode parameters – from the power spectra of the light curves of both stars, thus providing scope for a full seismic characterization.
Methods. The light curves were corrected for instrumental effects in a manner independent of the Kepler science pipeline. Estimation of individual mode parameters was based both on the maximization of the likelihood of a model describing the power spectrum and on a classic prewhitening method. Finally, we employed a procedure for selecting frequency lists to be used in stellar modeling.
Results. A total of 30 and 21 modes of degree l = 0,1,2 – spanning at least eight radial orders – have been identified for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273, respectively. Two avoided crossings (l = 1 ridge) have been identified for KIC 10273246, whereas one avoided crossing plus another likely one have been identified for KIC 10920273. Good agreement is found between observed and predicted mode amplitudes for the Ftype star KIC 10273246, based on a revised scaling relation. Estimates are given of the rotational periods, the parameters describing stellar granulation and the global asteroseismic parameters Δν and ν_{max}.
Key words: stars: oscillations / methods: data analysis / asteroseismology / stars: solartype / stars: individual: KIC 10273246 / stars: individual: KIC 10920273
© ESO, 2011
1. Introduction
Information given in the Kepler input catalog.
The NASA Kepler mission was designed to use the transit method to detect Earthlike planets in and near the habitable zones of latetype mainsequence stars (Borucki et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2010). The satellite consists of a 0.95m aperture telescope with a CCD array and is capable of producing photometric observations with a precision of a few partspermillion (ppm) during a period of 4–6 years. The highquality data provided by Kepler are also well suited for conducting asteroseismic studies of stars as part of the Kepler asteroseismic investigation (KAI; Gilliland et al. 2010a). Photometry of the vast majority of these stars is conducted at long cadence (29.4 min), while a revolving selection of up to 512 stars are monitored at short cadence (58.85 s). Shortcadence data allow us to investigate solarlike oscillations in mainsequence stars and subgiants, whose dominant periods are of the order of several minutes (Chaplin et al. 2010; ChristensenDalsgaard et al. 2010; Metcalfe et al. 2010).
The information contained in solarlike oscillations allows fundamental stellar properties (e.g., mass, radius and age) to be determined (e.g., Stello et al. 2009b; ChristensenDalsgaard et al. 2010; Kallinger et al. 2010a). The internal stellar structure can be constrained to unprecedented levels, provided that individual oscillation mode parameters are extracted (e.g., Cunha et al. 2007). This is possible in the case of the highest signaltonoise ratio (SNR) observations, leading us to hope that asteroseismology will produce significant improvement on the theories related to stellar structure and evolution, on topics as diverse as energy generation and transport, rotation and stellar cycles (e.g., Karoff et al. 2009; García et al. 2010).
Solarlike oscillations in a few tens of mainsequence stars and subgiants have been previously measured using groundbased highprecision spectroscopy (e.g., Bedding et al. 2010b) and the spacebased photometric mission CoRoT (e.g., Michel et al. 2008). During the first seven months of Kepler science operations, an asteroseismic survey of solartype stars made it possible to detect solarlike oscillations in about 500 targets (Chaplin et al. 2011b). This constitutes an increase of one order of magnitude in the number of such stars with confirmed oscillations. This large, homogeneous data sample opens the possibility of conducting ensemble asteroseismology.
Since the start of Kepler science operations in 2009 May, a selection of solartype stars have been continuously monitored at short cadence for more than seven months in order to test and validate the timeseries photometry. Such continuous and long observations, also previously achieved by CoRoT (e.g., Benomar et al. 2009b), are unprecedented for solartype stars other than the Sun. We present herein the analysis of two of these stars^{1}, namely, KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273, both displaying relatively low SNR in the pmode peaks. Two other stars, namely, KIC 11395018 and KIC 11234888, are analysed in a companion paper (Mathur et al. 2011). The analysis of these four stars has been conducted in a way so as to group together stars observed for the same length of time.
The two solartype stars selected for this study are relatively faint (see Table 1) if we bear in mind that the apparent magnitude target range for detection of solarlike oscillations with Kepler spans Kp ≈ 6.5 to Kp ≈ 12.5 (see Fig. 5 of Chaplin et al. 2011a). The Kepler Input Catalog^{2} (KIC; e.g., Latham et al. 2005; Batalha et al. 2010; Brown et al. 2011), from which all KASC targets have been selected, classifies KIC 10273246 as an Ftype star and KIC 10920273 as a Gtype star (Table 1). The atmospheric parameters provided by the KIC – as derived from photometric observations acquired in the Sloan filters – do not have sufficient precision for asteroseismology. Although we can apply scaling relations to convert the KIC parameters of these targets into predicted seismic and nonresonant background parameters, as well as fundamental stellar properties, caution is needed if use is to be made of these derived quantities. Tighter constraints on T_{eff}, log g and [Fe/H] will be obtained from spectra collected for these two targets with the FIES spectrograph at the Nordic Optical Telescope (Creevey et al., in prep.).
The outline of the paper is as follows: we start in Sect. 2 by providing some background information on the properties of solarlike oscillations. In Sect. 3 we give an overview of the different peakbagging^{3} strategies employed and define a recipe for selecting frequency lists. Section 4 is devoted to a thorough analysis of the power spectra of the time series. A summary and conclusions are presented in Sect. 5.
2. Properties of solarlike oscillations
Solarlike oscillations are predominantly global standing acoustic waves. These are p modes (pressure playing the role of the restoring force) and are characterized by being intrinsically damped while simultaneously stochastically excited by nearsurface convection (e.g., ChristensenDalsgaard 2004). Therefore, all stars cool enough to harbor an outer convective envelope – whose locus in the HR diagram approximately extends from the cool edge of the Cepheid instability strip and includes the red giant branch – may be expected to exhibit solarlike oscillations.
Modes of oscillation are characterized by three quantum numbers: n, l and m. The radial order n characterizes the behavior of the mode in the radial direction. The degree l and the azimuthal order m determine the spherical harmonic describing the properties of the mode as a function of colatitude and longitude. In the case of stellar observations, the associated wholedisk light integration and consequent lack of spatial resolution strongly suppress the signal from all but the modes of the lowest degree (with l ≤ 3). For a spherically symmetric nonrotating star, mode frequencies depend only on n and l.
The observed modes of oscillation are typically highorder acoustic modes. If interaction with a g mode (gravity playing the role of the restoring force) can be neglected, linear, adiabatic, highorder acoustic modes, in a spherically symmetric star, satisfy an asymptotic relation for the frequencies (Vandakurov 1967; Tassoul 1980): (1)where the large frequency separation Δν is the inverse of the sound travel time across the stellar diameter, ε is a phase mostly sensitive to the properties of the nearsurface region, and D_{0} is a parameter sensitive to the soundspeed gradient near the core. The regular spacing of the frequency spectrum as conveyed by Eq. (1) is a characteristic feature of solarlike oscillations. We should, however, bear in mind that Eq. (1) is only an approximation. The large frequency separation does in fact depend both on frequency and on mode degree, being defined as (2)It is also conventional to define a socalled small frequency separation, also varying with frequency: (3)The large frequency separation essentially scales with the square root of the mean stellar density (e.g., Brown & Gilliland 1994). Furthermore, the small frequency separation is sensitive to the structure of the core, decreasing with increasing stellar age. These two quantities thus have great diagnostic potential (e.g., ChristensenDalsgaard 1993; Deheuvels et al. 2010b).
Sharp variations in the stellar interior cause detectable oscillatory signals in the frequencies, also visible in the behavior of Δν as a function of frequency (e.g., Monteiro et al. 2000; Ballot et al. 2004; Basu et al. 2004; Cunha & Metcalfe 2007; Houdek & Gough 2007). These sharp features are mainly linked to borders of convection zones and to regions of rapid variation in the sound speed due to ionization of a dominant element. Their combined signature is detectable in frequencies of lowdegree modes and such an analysis becomes possible in the stellar case once frequency precision is sufficiently high.
Stellar rotation, as well as any other physical process resulting in departure from spherical symmetry, introduces a dependence of the frequencies of nonradial modes on m. When the cyclic rotational frequency of the star, ν_{rot}, is small and in the case of rigidbody rotation dominated by advection, the cyclic frequency of a nonradial mode is given to first order by (Ledoux 1951): (4)To a second order of approximation, centrifugal effects that disrupt the equilibrium structure of the star are taken into account through an additional frequency perturbation (independent of the sign of m). This perturbation in turn scales as the ratio of the centrifugal to the gravitational forces at the stellar surface, i.e., Ω^{2}R^{3}/(GM), where Ω denotes the surface angular velocity, R the radius of the star, M its mass, and G the universal gravitational constant. Although negligible in the Sun, these effects may be significant for fasterrotating solartype stars (e.g., Ballot 2010). Largescale magnetic fields may also introduce further corrections to the oscillation frequencies.
The frequency dependence of the mode surface amplitudes is determined both by (i) the frequency dependence of the stochastic process of excitation (mode energies result from a balance between the frequencydependent energy input and the damping rate) and by (ii) the mode properties in the region of vigorous convection (e.g., Houdek et al. 1999; Samadi et al. 2007). The stochastic process of excitation is characterized by a relatively slow variation with frequency, meaning that it excites modes over a large frequency interval to comparable surface amplitudes. At low frequencies modes are evanescent in the region of efficient excitation, leading to small surface amplitudes. At high frequencies – greater than or equal to the acoustic cutoff frequency – modes undergo considerable energy loss through running waves in the atmosphere. Excitation is most efficient for those modes whose periods match the timescale of the nearsurface convection. Also, the frequency of maximum amplitude, ν_{max}, is supposed to scale with the acoustic cutoff frequency, ν_{ac} (Brown et al. 1991; Kjeldsen & Bedding 1995). All this gives rise to a characteristic distribution of power with frequency which is a signature of the presence of solarlike oscillations.
Substantial changes in the properties of solarlike oscillations occur with stellar evolution, particularly following the exhaustion of hydrogen in the core. Most noticeable is the occurrence of avoided crossings due to coupling between p and g modes of like degree (Osaki 1975; Aizenman et al. 1977), which lead to significant departures from the regular frequency spacing described by Eq. (1) in the case of evolved stars. The frequencies of nonradial modes, in particular those of l = 1 modes, are shifted by avoided crossings when they couple with g modes trapped in the deep stellar interior. At the avoided crossings these modes have a mixed nature, with both p and gmode behavior. Provided they are excited to observable amplitudes (their high mode inertia reduces their surface amplitude), these socalled mixed modes are of great diagnostic potential because they probe the stellar core and are very sensitive to stellar age.
3. On extracting estimates of mode frequencies
3.1. Overview of the different fitting strategies
We computed the power density spectrum (PDS) of the time series based on the implementation of the LombScargle periodogram (Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982) presented in Press & Rybicki (1989). This algorithm carries out reverse interpolation of the data onto a regular mesh and subsequently employs the fast Fourier transform. The power spectrum was then calibrated so that it satisfies Parseval’s theorem, i.e., so that the total power in the positivefrequency side of the spectrum is equal to the variance of the time series (singlesided calibration). The effect of the window function is further taken into account when normalizing the PDS.
A total of eleven individual fitters (A2Z_CR, A2Z_DS, A2Z_RG, AAU, IAS_OB, IAS_PG, IAS_TA, OCT, ORK, QML and SYD) extracted estimates of the pmode frequencies for at least one of the two stars and subsequently uploaded their results to the Cat Basket^{4} data exchange facility. Different fitting strategies have been adopted and sometimes the same fitting strategy has been applied in an independent manner. All the fitting strategies adopted are, however, based on Fourier methods, the main idea behind them being either the maximization of the likelihood of a multiparameter model describing the data or a classic prewhitening method.
A frequencydomain representation of the data aims at modeling the limit PDS of the time series. Such a model typically includes a sum of symmetric Lorentzian profiles meant to describe the individual p modes, together with a flat term and a number of additional terms describing both instrumental and stellar background noise (Anderson et al. 1990): (5)where H is the mode height, Γ is the mode linewidth (related to the mode lifetime or amplitude efolding time, τ_{mode}, through πΓ = 1/τ_{mode}), and B(ν) represents the background signal. The components arising from the decay of active regions, granulation and faculae are commonly represented using a Harveylike model (Harvey 19856; Aigrain et al. 2004): (6)where { σ_{k} } are the amplitudes, { τ_{k} } are the characteristic timescales, { s_{k} } are the slopes of the individual power laws in the denominator, and W is a constant representing white noise (mainly due to photon shot noise). Equations (5) and (6) are representative of the models employed and individual fitters were further allowed to customize their own models. Hence we cannot talk of a reference model, as was done in Appourchaux et al. (2008).
Most fitters opted for performing a global fit (e.g., Appourchaux et al. 2008) – whereby the whole set of free parameters needed to describe the observed spectrum was optimized simultaneously – while there was still room for pseudoglobal (or local) fitting (e.g., JiménezReyes et al. 2008), an approach traditionally adopted for Sunasastar data, whereby narrow frequency windows are considered at a time.
Statistical inference from the data was either frequentist or Bayesian in nature. The former approach relies on the straightforward application of a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) taking into account the correct statistics of the spectrum (e.g., Toutain & Appourchaux 1994; Appourchaux et al. 2008) or, in the special case of Gaussian statistics, a least squares estimator (LSE). To be specific: A2Z_CR applied a global LSE to a smoothed version of the spectrum; A2Z_DS applied a local MLE; IAS_TA, OCT and QML applied a global MLE. The latter approach makes it possible to incorporate relevant prior information through Bayes’ theorem. A regularized version of a MLE, known as maximum a posteriori (MAP; e.g., Gaulme et al. 2009), is a Bayesian point estimation method and was applied (globally) by A2Z_RG and IAS_PG. AAU and IAS_OB also performed global fits but instead used Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques to map the posterior probability distributions of the frequency parameters (e.g., Benomar et al. 2009a; Gruberbauer et al. 2009; Handberg & Campante 2011). With the exception of AAU and IAS_OB, who estimated the frequency uncertainties based on the posterior distributions of these same parameters, all the remaining fitters provided formal error bars derived from the inverse Hessian matrix.
ORK and SYD adopted a different approach, which did not involve fitting a model to the power density spectrum. ORK applied a procedure known as iterative sinewave fitting (ISWF; e.g., Bedding et al. 2007; Bonanno et al. 2008; White et al. 2010): it iteratively removes sinusoidal components from the data, which are identified as the maxima of the Fourier spectrum of the residuals. Since the number of oscillation modes present in the data is unknown a priori, the algorithm requires a stopping rule that associates some degree of confidence to the amplitude of each extracted sinusoidal component. For the analysis by SYD, the power spectrum was smoothed by convolving with a Gaussian with full width at half maximum of 1.4μHz (comparable to the intrinsic linewidth of the modes) and the frequencies of the highest peaks were measured. Mode identification (assigning l values) was done using the échelle diagram (Grec et al. 1983) both by ORK and SYD. Finally, frequency uncertainties are estimated either analytically (ORK) or by performing Monte Carlo simulations with artificial data (SYD).
3.2. Procedure for selecting frequency lists
A procedure for selecting relevant frequency lists to be used in stellar modeling has been described in Metcalfe et al. (2010). However, we have opted for revising that procedure. This has been motivated, at first, by the fact that different fitting strategies provided frequency uncertainties that differed greatly. For instance, uncertainties that had been underestimated would undesirably upweight the respective individual frequency sets. Consequently, a more robust method of frequency selection was needed. Other refinements were also made and we give below a detailed description of the new, revised procedure.
We aim at selecting, for a given star and for a given mode degree identification, two frequency sets – a minimal frequency set and a maximal frequency set – that will provide initial constraints for the modeling and allow for refined modelfitting, respectively. As before, we would like to determine individual sets, as opposed to averaged sets, meaning that these sets are fully reproducible.
We start by constructing both a minimal list and a maximal list of modes. Take N as being the total number of individual fitters providing peakbagging results for a given star and assume for now that N > 2. For each { n,l } pair, we apply Peirce’s criterion (see Appendix A for its implementation; Peirce 1852; Gould 1855) for the rejection of outliers and assess how many frequency estimates are retained. Inclusion or not of the mode in the minimal list then results from a vote including all (N) fitters: If the number of frequencies retained is greater than^{5} ⌊ N/2 ⌋ then the mode is added to the minimal list. Inclusion or not of the mode in the maximal list is decided as follows: If the number of frequencies retained is at least 2 then the mode is added to the maximal list. The minimal list is thus a subset of the maximal list. For N = 2 the minimal and maximal lists are degenerate and will coincide.
In the final stage of the procedure, we compute for each of the N individual frequency sets the normalized rootmeansquare deviation (nrmsd) with respect to the frequencies averaged over all contributing fitters, , belonging to the minimal list of modes: (7)where σ_{nl} is the uncertainty in ν_{nl}, and N_{1} is the number of modes in a particular individual set that actually belong to the minimal list. The best fit is defined as being the individual set with the smallest normalized rms deviation. Note that by best fit we mean here the most representative fit among the N available sets and not necessarily the one closest to the truth. The minimal and maximal frequency sets are finally given by those modes provided by the best fit that belong to the minimal and maximal lists, respectively. The homogeneous character of the revised procedure is reassured by generating the minimal and maximal frequency sets from the same individual set. The corresponding frequency uncertainties are simply those associated with the best fit. When N = 2 a single frequency set is defined, the same happening for N = 1 in which case it coincides with the only available individual set.
Although having been revised, this procedure is still subject to future improvement. The main reason for this is the fact that we assume the l values to be correctly assigned to modes by all the fitters. A way of overcoming this would be to implement a clustering algorithm that groups frequencies and posteriorly tags them with a mode degree based on a vote. Another issue concerns the possibility that the best fit misses some modes from the minimal and maximal lists. A solution for this would be to ask the fitter providing the best fit to reanalyse the power spectrum. One last drawback of this procedure is the possibility that the minimal and maximal frequency sets may contain some outliers, i.e., frequency estimates that have been ruled out according to Peirce’s criterion.
4. Data analysis
4.1. Time series preparation
The stars were observed from 2009 May 2 to 2010 March 19, i.e., from Quarter 0 (Q0) to Quarter 4 (Q4). The duty cycle over the course of the approximately 10 months of observations was above 90%. Available time series suffered from several instrumental perturbations, and we have thus decided to develop our own corrections (García et al. 2011), independently from the presearch data conditioning module of the Kepler science pipeline (Jenkins et al. 2010), which generates corrected light curves for transitingplanet search.
Fig. 1 Rawflux time series corrected only for outliers (top panel) and corrected relative time series (bottom panel) for the case of KIC 10273246. Vertical dashed lines mark the beginning of each Quarter, whereas vertical dotted lines separate the segments within a Quarter. 

Open with DEXTER 
The rawflux time series were corrected for three types of effects: outliers, jumps and drifts. Data points considered to be outliers exhibit pointtopoint deviations greater than 3σ_{diff}, where σ_{diff} is the standard deviation of the first differences of the time series. This correction removed approximately 1% of the data points. Jumps are sudden changes in the mean value of the time series caused by, e.g., attitude adjustments or a drop in pixel sensitivity (see Fig. 1). They were identified as causing spurious differences in the mean power of contiguous bins spanning one day. In cases where we know the photometric apertures to have changed, we by default check for jumps (only implemented in segments Q2.1 and Q4.1). Each jump has been manually validated. Finally, drifts are small, lowfrequency perturbations due to temperature changes (e.g., after a long safemode event) and lasting for a few days (see Fig. 2). The corrections are based on the software developed to deal with highvoltage perturbations in the GOLF/SoHO instrument (García et al. 2005). We fit a 2nd or 3rdorder polynomial function to the section of the time series where a thermal drift has been observed after comparing several light curves of the same Quarter. The fitted polynomial is then subtracted and another polynomial function of 1st or 2ndorder – used as a reference – is added, which has been computed based on the observations done before and after the affected section. If the correction has to be applied to a border of the time series, then only one side of the light curve is processed.
Fig. 2 Rawflux time series (corrected only for outliers) of Quarter 2 for the case of KIC 10273246. Vertical dotted lines separate the three segments of Q2. The induced thermal drift after a safemode event is visible between the 60th and 70th days. 

Open with DEXTER 
Once the aforementioned corrections have been applied, we merge the data of the different Quarters into a single time series, after equalizing the average countingrate level between the Quarters (or sometimes even within a Quarter when some instrumental parameters have been changed). In order to do so, and to allow conversion into units of ppm, we use a series of 6thorder polynomial fits, one for each segment. Finally, we normalize the standard deviation of the data obtained during Q3 to the average of the other Quarters, since Q3 is considerably noisier for the two stars. This normalization proved to be a good compromise between using the noisy Q3 data and not using them at all. Given the insufficient technical information available, it is not possible to know whether or not there is a variation in the gain of the CCD module during Q3. If such a gain variation is indeed present, the mode amplitudes would be affected and the adopted normalization will then correct these amplitudes toward something closer to their real value. If, on the other hand, no gain variation is present, then the adopted correction will effectively reduce the mode amplitudes. Having reduced the standard deviation of the data in Q3 by 34% for KIC 10273246 and 49% for KIC 10920273, and given that Q3 represents 3/7 of the total length of the time series used for peakbagging (i.e., from Q0 to Q3; see Sect. 4.5), then mode amplitudes would be reduced by about 14% and 21%, respectively. However, we believe this latter scenario to be less likely and hence the quoted values of 14% and 21% can only be regarded as upper limits to mode amplitude reduction, which in reality may be much smaller.
Fig. 3 Lowfrequency end – between 0.1 and 3μHz – of the power density spectrum of KIC 10273246. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 4 Similar to Fig. 3 but for the case of KIC 10920273. 

Open with DEXTER 
4.2. Rotational modulation
To investigate the stellar rotational period (P_{rot}) of these stars we seek highSNR peaks in the lowfrequency end of the PDS. However, the procedure for merging the different data sets described in the previous paragraph filters out the power density below 1 μHz. Therefore, starting with the corrected data, we have generated new merged time series in which a triangular smoothing – over a period selected from the range of 12–20 days – has been used to normalize the light curves instead of the 6thorder polynomial fit (for details, see García et al. 2011). Finally, we computed the PDS of the fulllength time series and also of two subsets of 160 days each. The lowfrequency ends of the PDS are shown in Figs. 3 and 4 for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273, respectively. A different pattern of peaks appears for each star. In the case of KIC 10273246 (Fig. 3), the highest peak is seen at about 0.50μHz (P_{rot} ≈ 23days) in the three spectra considered, without any signature of differential rotation. This turns out to be a reliable signature of rotational modulation, since comparison with the power spectra of other stars observed with the same CCD module ruled out the possibility of an instrumental artifact. On the other hand, KIC 10920273 (Fig. 4) exhibits a high peak at about 0.43μHz, though mostly during the second subset of 160 days. Indeed, this peak is not very significant, and during the first subset it is at the same level as that of the adjacent peaks. The PDS of the fulllength time series also reveals itself as being rather noisy, and it is difficult to disentangle the stellar rotational period from it. Therefore, while a cyclic rotational frequency of 0.43μHz (P_{rot} ≈ 27days) seems plausible, we cannot exclude the possibility that this peak is associated with the roll schedule of the telescope. One of several alternative explanations for the lowSNR peaks would be that this star was observed during a low magneticactivity period, with a small number of spots on its surface. A deeper study based on a longer data set is necessary to confirm the rotational rate of KIC 10920273.
4.3. Power spectral density of the background
The power density spectra – based on the first seven months of observations, i.e., from Q0 to Q3 – of KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273 are displayed in Fig. 5. The background signal rises toward the lowfrequency end of the spectra with contributions from granulation and activity. At the highfrequency end, the spectra are dominated by photon shot noise. Also visible at the highfrequency end are a number of peaks corresponding to harmonics of the inverse of the longcadence period, an artifact appearing in power spectra of shortcadence time series (Gilliland et al. 2010b) but having negligible influence on the current study. In between these two frequency regimes there is a conspicuous cluster of power due to the presence of p modes, with the hotter and brighter target KIC 10273246 displaying the higher SNR.
We fitted a model similar to the one described in Eq. (6) to a heavily smoothed version of both spectra. This model included an additional Gaussian function aimed at describing the pmode powerexcess hump (e.g., Kallinger et al. 2010b). The fitting window was from 100μHz up to the Nyquist frequency, hence we did not consider a term accounting for the decay of active regions, whose typical timescale is considerably longer. We found no evidence for a facular component based on a simple visual inspection of the spectra, thus having not included such a component in the background model. Faculae had previously been reported on a couple of Kepler solartype targets by Chaplin et al. (2010). A component carrying the signature of stellar granulation is, however, clearly displayed by both stars. Figure 5 displays the fitted models, while values of the fitted parameters are given in Table 2. Note that the slope of both granulation components has been fixed at the same value, i.e., s_{gran} = 3, which is closer to solar (e.g., Michel et al. 2009) than the value of 2 originally proposed by Harvey (19856). Although we lack a physical reason for fixing this slope, the intention is to facilitate the comparison between the values of τ_{gran}.
The highfrequency noise power spectral density (W) is approximately 14% and 16% higher than predictions in the cases of KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273, respectively. These predictions have been computed according to the empirical minimal term model for the noise presented in Gilliland et al. (2010b), which takes into account the Keplerband magnitude of the star and the performance of the instrument. Noise levels are thus close to being Poissonlimited. A likely source of this extra noise is the larger scatter in Q3.
Background model parameters describing nonresonant features.
Fig. 5 Power density spectra – smoothed over 1μHz in order to enhance pmode visibility – of KIC 10273246 (top panel) and KIC 10920273 (bottom panel), plotted on a loglog scale. The solid black lines represent the fits described in the text. The remaining lines represent different components of the fitting model: the power envelope due to oscillations added to the offset from white noise (dashed), and granulation (dotted). 

Open with DEXTER 
4.4. The global asteroseismic parameters Δν, ν_{max} and δν_{n0}
In the past few years, a number of automated pipelines have been developed to measure global asteroseismic parameters of solarlike oscillators (Huber et al. 2009; Mosser & Appourchaux 2009; Roxburgh 2009; Campante et al. 2010; Hekker et al. 2010; Karoff et al. 2010; Mathur et al. 2010b). Most of them have already been successfully tested on CoRoT data (e.g., Mathur et al. 2010a). The automated nature of these pipelines is required if we are to efficiently exploit the plenitude of data made available by Kepler on these targets. A thorough comparison of complementary analysis methods used to extract global asteroseismic parameters of mainsequence and subgiant solarlike oscillators is presented in Verner et al. (2011).
Estimates of the global asteroseismic parameters Δν, ν_{max} and δν_{n0}.
The results of the different pipelines on global parameter extraction have also been uploaded to the Cat Basket. For a given global parameter, some groups submitted results using more than one method or on more than one data release. In Table 3 we give a representative set of estimates of Δν and ν_{max} for the two stars in our study. These estimates were supplied by one of the pipelines, namely, the one described in Mosser & Appourchaux (2009), and are based on the analysis of the fulllength time series. The large separation is a function of frequency. Consequently, the extent of variation of its mean value will depend upon the variation in frequency range adopted for its computation. However, as long as this frequency range includes ν_{max}, the impact of small differences in the range can be neglected. For the sake of completeness, we give the adopted frequency ranges in Table 3. An observed relation between Δν and ν_{max} for solarlike oscillations in mainsequence stars is presented in Stello et al. (2009a): (8)The values quoted in Table 3 for these two global parameters satisfy this relation, as can be seen in Fig. 6. Also, τ_{gran} is seen to scale inversely with ν_{max}, as predicted by Kjeldsen & Bedding (2011).
The same pipeline has provided estimates of δν_{n0} based on the analysis of seven months of data. These are also given in Table 3.
Fig. 6 Observed relation between Δν and ν_{max}. Here we reproduce Fig. 2 of Stello et al. (2009a) in linear scale, where only stars whose ν_{max} is greater than the Nyquist frequency for longcadence sampling are displayed. The solid line is the powerlaw fit in their Eq. (1) with the corresponding ± 15% deviations shown as dotted lines. We added to the plot the two stars being considered in this study (fivepointed stars), the two stars (squares) of Mathur et al. (2011), and the three bright Gtype stars (triangles) of Chaplin et al. (2010). 

Open with DEXTER 
Summary of the best fits.
The minimal and maximal frequency sets of observed oscillation frequencies for KIC 10273246.
4.5. Mode frequencies
Estimates of mode frequencies were obtained by several individual fitters for both stars, based on the first seven months of observations (from Q0 to Q3). The procedure described in Sect. 3.2 was then used to select minimal and maximal frequency sets. An ad hoc step was, however, implemented at this stage, that aimed at removing doubtful modes from these sets based on SNR considerations. This quality control led to the removal of a few modes at the low and highfrequency ends of the sets.
Another issue relates to the presence of mixed modes in the power spectrum. As we will see below, the best fit relies, for both stars, on an algorithm based on a frequencydomain representation of the data (cf. Eq. (5)). Moreover, the deterministic models that have been used only contained modes of degree up to l = 2, with three modes per radial order, one of each degree. The presence of an extra mixed mode in the vicinity of a mode with low SNR therefore greatly complicates the fit due to the inadequacy of the model. As a result, we opted for prewhitening the longerlived mixed modes and give their frequencies a posteriori, while discarding any neighboring power structure with low SNR fitted by the MLEbased algorithm.
Eleven individual fitters (A2Z_CR, A2Z_DS, A2Z_RG, AAU, IAS_OB, IAS_PG, IAS_TA, OCT, ORK, QML and SYD) have provided results for KIC 10273246. A summary of the anonymous best fit is given in Table 4. The fitter has also imposed priors on the parameters used to describe the background signal, which were based on the output of a previous fit to the background alone. Table 5 and Fig. 7 combine the minimal and maximal frequency sets (recall that the former is a subset of the latter). We have identified a total of 30 modes of degree l = 0,1,2 that span a frequency range of width ≈ 10 Δν. The mode at 1122.70μHz has only been reported by two fitters, who have identified it as being a radial mode despite its alignment with the l = 2 ridge. Given its very low power and the known convergence issues experienced by MLEbased methods under such low SNR conditions, we have decided to change its tagging a posteriori from l = 0 to l = 2. This mode should thus be considered with caution.
The problem of ridge identification (i.e., the tagging of modes by degree l) in F stars dates back to when CoRoT observations of HD 49933 were first analysed by Appourchaux et al. (2008). In the present case such an identification can be simply done by visual inspection of the échelle diagram in Fig. 7. Nonetheless, two of the fitters (IAS_OB and IAS_TA) provided results for the two complementary identification scenarios. From the results provided by IAS_TA we are able to compute the likelihood ratio (e.g., Appourchaux et al. 1998) in favor of our preferred scenario, whereas computation of its Bayesian counterpart, the more conservative Bayes’ factor (e.g., Liddle 2009; Handberg & Campante 2011), is possible based on the results provided by IAS_OB. Both approaches returned conclusive values in support of the adopted scenario.
Ten individual fitters (A2Z_CR, A2Z_DS, A2Z_RG, IAS_OB, IAS_PG, IAS_TA, OCT, ORK, QML and SYD) have provided results for KIC 10920273. A summary of the anonymous best fit is given in Table 4. In addition to the information provided in that table, it should also be mentioned that a Gaussian prior has been imposed on δν_{n0}. Table 6 and Fig. 8 combine the minimal and maximal frequency sets. We have identified a total of 21 modes – considerably less than for KIC 10273246 – of degree l = 0,1,2 that span a frequency range of width ≈ 8 Δν. The l = 1 mode at 1135.36μHz is very close to the second harmonic (2 × 566.391μHz) of the longcadence sampling. Although this anomaly is known to be more prominent for intermediate harmonics, we nonetheless follow the recommendation of Gilliland et al. (2010b) to flag this mode as suspect.
Fig. 7 Échelle diagram of the power density spectrum of KIC 10273246 (the colorbar decodes the power density level). The minimal (filled symbols) and maximal (filled and open symbols) frequency sets are displayed. Symbol shapes indicate mode degree: l = 0 (circles), l = 1 (triangles) and l = 2 (squares). 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 8 Similar to Fig. 7 but for the case of KIC 10920273. 

Open with DEXTER 
The minimal and maximal frequency sets of observed oscillation frequencies for KIC 10920273.
The quasiregularity of the small (δν_{n0}) and large frequency separations (Δν_{n0} and Δν_{n2}) is evident from Figs. 7 and 8. Notice that if these stars were to strictly obey the asymptotic relation in Eq. (1), they would then exhibit vertical ridges in the échelle diagram provided use of the correct Δν. The small separation δν_{n0} is, however, more clearly distinguished in the case of KIC 10920273, which might be an indication of smaller mode linewidths in this cooler star (see Sect. 4.6 for a discussion on mode linewidths).
Linewidths, heights, and bolometric amplitudes of radial modes for KIC 10273246 returned by the best fit (these are not provided for the radial mode of highest frequency since convergence was not properly achieved).
A striking feature in both échelle diagrams is the jagged appearance of the l = 1 ridge, a trademark of the presence of avoided crossings and an indicator of the evolved nature of these stars. These same features have also been seen in the cases of groundbased observations of η Boo (Kjeldsen et al. 2003), β Hyi (Bedding et al. 2007) and possibly Procyon (Bedding et al. 2010b), as well as in the cases of the CoRoT target HD 49385 (Deheuvels et al. 2010a), and KASC survey targets KIC 11026764 (Metcalfe et al. 2010), KIC 11395018 and KIC 11234888 (Mathur et al. 2011). Figure 9 displays a socalled pg diagram as introduced by Bedding (2011), where the frequencies of the avoided crossings (i.e., the frequencies of the pure g modes in the core cavity) for a number of stars are plotted against the large separation of the p modes. Much of the diagnostic potential of mixed modes can be captured in this way, since their overall pattern is determined by the mode bumping at each avoided crossing, which in turn is determined by the g modes trapped in the core. This diagram could prove to be an instructive way to display results of many stars and to allow for a first comparison with theoretical models. We also report here the possible presence of a l = 2 mixed mode in the power spectrum of KIC 10920273 (at 873.10μHz) that should, however, be confirmed by stellar models.
Detection of l = 3 modes with photometric observations is made very difficult due to geometric cancellation effects. Solarlike oscillations with l = 3 from Kepler photometry have nonetheless been reported for a set of lowluminosity red giants by Bedding et al. (2010a). Deheuvels et al. (2010a) have also reported the presence of l = 3 modes for the CoRoT target HD 49385. We should bear in mind that, except for ORK and SYD, all the remaining fitters used deterministic models in their frequencydomain representations of the data that only contained modes of degree up to l = 2, meaning that a statistical assessment of the presence or not of l = 3 modes could not be done. ORK and SYD, which were the only fitters that did not make any prior assumptions about the degree of the modes, have not reported the detection of modes that could be interpreted as l = 3 modes.
Fig. 9 pg diagram showing the frequencies of avoided crossings (diamonds) plotted against the large separation for a number of stars. The vertical lines show the range over which the l = 1 ridge is clearly seen. The inclined line is the observed relation between Δν and ν_{max} of Stello et al. (2009a). For KIC 10273246 there are two clear avoided crossings, whereas for KIC 10920273 there is only one clear crossing plus another likely one (open symbol). 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 10 Linewidths of the radial modes returned for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273 by the respective best fit. Modes represented by open symbols belong exclusively to the maximal frequency set. Dotdashed lines mark the predicted mean linewidths of the most prominent modes using Eq. (9). The horizontal dimension of the linefilled areas represents the uncertainty in ν_{max}. 

Open with DEXTER 
Linewidths, heights, and bolometric amplitudes of radial modes for KIC 10920273 returned by the best fit.
4.6. A word on mode linewidths, heights, and amplitudes
A thorough discussion of the mode linewidths, heights, and amplitudes goes beyond the scope of this work. However, there are some aspects we would like to mention here.
The intrinsic frequency resolution of the spectra ( ≈ 0.05μHz) makes it possible to resolve the modes. This condition is obeyed provided the observation length T ≫ 2τ_{mode} (Chaplin et al. 2003). Figure 10 displays, for each star, the linewidths of the radial modes returned by the respective best fit (see also Tables 7 and 8). The radial modes considered are those belonging to the maximal frequency set. Notice the nearconstancy with frequency of the mode linewidths in the case of KIC 10920273, whereas for KIC 10273246 the linewidths increase steadily, although with considerably larger error bars (note that both sets of error bars were derived from the inverse Hessian matrix). Using pulsation computations of a grid of stellar models and the first asteroseismic results on mode lifetimes of solarlike stars, Chaplin et al. (2009) suggested a simple scaling relation between the mean mode linewidth of the most prominent p modes and T_{eff}: (9)Figure 10 also displays the resulting predictions of mean linewidths of the most prominent modes (we have considered ⟨ Γ ⟩ _{⊙} ≈ 1.2μHz and T_{eff ⊙ } = 5777K, and taken the recalibrated KIC temperatures). The agreement with the observed values is fairly good in the case of KIC 10273246. On the other hand, the predicted value obtained for KIC 10920273 using Eq. (9) overestimates the observed linewidths. Assuming validity of this equation, this might be the result of the combination of two factors, namely, an overestimation of T_{eff} and an overestimation of the fitted background that leads to underestimated fitted linewidths. Nonetheless, the Ftype star KIC 10273246 exhibits the larger mode linewidths, as expected from Eq. (9). We should also note that Baudin et al. (2011) found a much stronger dependence of the mean mode linewidth on T_{eff}.
When a mode is resolved, as is the case here, it is the mode height, H, that determines the SNR in power, viz., the heighttobackground ratio. Figure 11 displays, for each star, the heights of the radial modes returned by the respective best fit (see also Tables 7 and 8). The modes are the same as shown in Fig. 10. We also indicate in Fig. 11 the SNR of the strongest radial modes, as well as the background fits of Fig. 5 (which are an indicator of SNR = 1). Overall, KIC 10273246 exhibits a higher SNR if we take into account the whole plotted frequency bands. Also apparent is the larger width of the pmode hump of KIC 10920273, which roughly scales with ν_{max} (e.g., Stello et al. 2007; Mosser et al. 2010).
Fig. 11 Heights of the radial modes returned for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273 by the respective best fit, plotted on a loglinear scale. Modes represented by open symbols belong exclusively to the maximal frequency set. Also indicated is the SNR of the strongest modes as well as the background fits of Fig. 5 (dotted lines). 

Open with DEXTER 
Furthermore, we computed the rms amplitudes of the radial modes, A_{n0}, according to (e.g., Chaplin et al. 2003): (10)Amplitudes are always better constrained than the heights and the linewidths themselves. We were careful enough to compute errors on the amplitudes that took into account the correlations between the fitted parameters Γ_{n0} and H_{n0} (e.g., Appourchaux 2011). These amplitudes were then scaled to their bolometric equivalent using the bolometric correction derived from the spectral response of the Kepler passband (Ballot et al. 2011). Finally, we obtained a maximum bolometric amplitude of (at 833.90μHz) for KIC 10273246 (cf. Table 7), and of (at 997.14μHz) for KIC 10920273 (cf. Table 8). These values were computed based on the results returned by the respective best fit and were found to be consistent with the values obtained from the other fitters’ results.
Kjeldsen & Bedding (1995) have suggested an empirical scaling relation to predict the amplitudes of solarlike oscillations that, although extensively used, predicts amplitudes in Ftype stars that are higher than actually observed (e.g., Michel et al. 2008). Recently, the same authors have proposed a new scaling relation for the amplitudes which is based on simple physical arguments (Kjeldsen & Bedding 2011): (11)where L is the stellar luminosity, and the value of r is chosen to be either r = 1.5 (assuming adiabatic oscillations) or r = 2 (following a fit to observational data in Kjeldsen & Bedding 1995). By assuming that ν_{max} is a fixed fraction of the acoustic cutoff frequency, i.e., (12)and adopting a scaling relation for the stellar mass based on seismic parameters (e.g., Kallinger et al. 2010b), (13)we can combine Eqs. (11)–(13) to obtain the following relation (normalized with respect to values in the Sun): (14)where , ν_{max ⊙ } = 3050μHz, and Δν_{⊙} = 135μHz. Note that by setting r = 1.5 (as we will be assuming hereafter), the dependence of Eq. (14) on T_{eff} is canceled and this scaling relation then solely depends on seismic parameters. Finally, use of this relation gives a predicted maximum bolometric amplitude of for KIC 10273246, and of for KIC 10920273, with the relatively large uncertainties dominated by the errors on ν_{max}. These values agree with the observed values at the 1σ level. This is a particularly interesting result, since no discrepancy is seen between the predicted and observed amplitudes for the Ftype star KIC 10273246.
4.7. Variation of Δν with frequency
An independent methodology has been used to estimate the large frequency separation and the mode frequencies, which is based on the analysis of the spectrum with the envelope autocorrelation function (EACF; Mosser & Appourchaux 2009). As initially proposed by Roxburgh & Vorontsov (2006), the autocorrelation of the time series – or, equivalently, the power spectrum of the power spectrum – windowed with a narrow filter gives the variation of the large separation with frequency, Δν(ν). Mosser (2010) has shown that, with a dedicated comb filter for analysing the power spectrum, it is possible to obtain independently the values of the large separation for the odd (l = 1) and even (l = 0,2) ridges. We denote them by Δν_{odd} and Δν_{even}. Proxies of the mode frequencies can then be integrated from the Δν(ν) frequency pattern. In practice, they are derived from the correlation between the observed PDS and a synthetic spectrum based on the Δν(ν) pattern.
Fig. 12 Variation of Δν_{odd} and Δν_{even} with frequency for KIC 10273246. The dashed line corresponds to the odd ridge, whereas the solid line corresponds to the even ridge. Error bars are given with the same linestyles. Proxies of the mode frequencies derived with the EACF have been superimposed and their values appended: l = 0 (circles) and l = 1 (triangles). The inset shows the comb filter used in the analysis. 

Open with DEXTER 
The values of Δν_{odd} and Δν_{even} for KIC 10273246 are given in Fig. 12. Notice the agreement between the proxies of the frequencies derived with the EACF and the frequencies of the maximal frequency set (Table 5). The EACF emphasizes the low values of Δν_{odd} as well as its large gradient at the lowfrequency end. Also clear is the large discrepancy relative to a regular échelle spectrum around 1000μHz. The only mode present in the maximal frequency set and not detected with the EACF is the mixed mode at 695.75μHz. This peak appears as supernumerary when compared to the regular agency of the modes. The EACF makes it possible to derive the large separation one radial order further than does peakbagging.
Results for KIC 10920273 are given in Fig. 13. The lower SNR is counterbalanced by using a broader filter when computing the EACF. Again, the analysis is not conclusive for one mixed mode at low frequency, but it is able to recover the l = 1 ridge. We note that the even ridge is affected by the proximity of mixed modes. As opposed to the case of KIC 10273246, the EACF does not provide any further modes.
Fig. 13 Similar to Fig. 12 but for the case of KIC 10920273. 

Open with DEXTER 
4.8. Rotational splitting and inclination
Stellar rotation removes the (2l + 1)fold degeneracy of the frequencies of nonradial modes, allowing for a direct measurement of the stellar angular velocity averaged over the regions probed by these modes, as conveyed by Eq. (4). Using the radii and masses computed from modelgridbased methods by Creevey et al. (in prep.) together with the estimates of P_{rot}, we have computed the ratio of the surface angular velocity to the Keplerian breakup velocity, i.e., , which returned a value of approximately 1% for both stars, indicating that these are most likely slow rotators. In view of this and given the precision achievable from the spectra, we have thus decided not to include any secondorder effects on the rotational splitting.
The overall profile of a nonradial multiplet thus consists of the sum of 2l + 1 Lorentzian profiles regularly spaced in frequency, and scaled in height according to the E_{lm}(i) factors (Dziembowski 1977; Dziembowski & Goode 1985; Gizon & Solanki 2003): (15)where i is the inclination angle between the direction of the stellar rotation axis and the line of sight, and are the associated Legendre functions. Note that ∑ _{m}E_{lm}(i) = 1, meaning that the E_{lm}(i) factors represent the relative power contained in the modes within a multiplet.
While we are not able to robustly constrain the rotational splitting and inclination for both stars, we are however in a position to impose loose constraints on these parameters. Figures 14 and 15 map the twodimensional posterior probability distributions of these parameters respectively for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273, based on the samples from a MCMC analysis of the tenmonthlong time series by IAS_OB. We have overlaid each of these correlation maps with curves representing the estimate of P_{rot} given in Sect. 4.2 and the P_{rot}(i) relation of Creevey et al. (in prep.), obtained by combining the projected rotational velocity (vsini) with the stellar radius.
For KIC 10273246, a comparison of the estimate of the rotational period with the P_{rot}(i) relation implies that i ≳ 20°, which is also corroborated by the underlying correlation map. Moreover, we notice that the marginal posterior probability distribution of ν_{rot} is unimodal and points toward an interior rotating roughly as fast as the surface. We are however cautious not to claim to have robustly constrained the rotational splitting, since changes in the model – as well as in the priors on its parameters – used to represent the background signal may lead to significant alterations in the correlation map.
Fig. 14 Twodimensional posterior probability distribution of ν_{rot} and i for KIC 10273246 (the colorbar decodes the probability density level). The prior on i is uniform over the plotted range, whereas the prior on ν_{rot} is uniform over the interval 0–2μHz with a decaying Gaussian wing for higher values of the splitting. The dotdashed line marks the estimate of the stellar rotational period given in Sect. 4.2. Furthermore, the P_{rot}(i) relation (solid curve) of Creevey et al. (in preparation) is shown together with the corresponding confidence interval (dotted curves). 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 15 Similar to Fig. 14 but for the case of KIC 10920273. Given the possibility that vsini ≈ 0km s^{1}, the lower bound of the confidence interval of P_{rot}(i) will coincide with the horizontal axis. 

Open with DEXTER 
For KIC 10920273, no constraints on i are possible from a comparison of the estimate of the rotational period with the P_{rot}(i) relation. We should nevertheless remind the reader that the estimate of P_{rot} is somewhat doubtful (see Sect. 4.2). Although not completely apparent from Fig. 15, the marginal posterior probability distribution of i favors the scenario of a star seen poleon (i.e., i ≈ 0°). Consequently, according to Eq. (15), this would make inviable an inference of the rotational splitting. Going back to the discussion in Sect. 4.2, the possibility that this star is seen poleon gains strength in explaining the lowSNR peaks at the lowfrequency end of the PDS. There is however an alternative interpretation of the correlation map shown in Fig. 15 that should not be neglected: the high sensitivity of the parameter i to realization noise may lead to what is known as fit locking at 0° (e.g., Gizon & Solanki 2003; Ballot et al. 2008).
5. Summary and conclusions
The evolved Sunlike stars KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273, respectively of spectral types F and G, were observed with Kepler at short cadence for approximately ten months (from Q0 to Q4) with a duty cycle in excess of 90%. The light curves used in the present analysis have been corrected for instrumental effects in a manner independent of the Kepler science pipeline. Both stars are relatively faint and display low SNR in the pmode peaks.
Different fitting strategies have been employed to extract estimates of pmode frequencies as well as of other individual mode parameters, from which we have selected frequency lists that will help constraining stellar models. A total of 30 and 21 modes of degree l = 0,1,2 have been identified for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273, respectively. These span at least eight radial orders. Furthermore, two avoided crossings (l = 1 ridge) have been identified for KIC 10273246, whereas one avoided crossing plus another likely one have been identified for KIC 10920273. These avoided crossings yield strong constraints – although modeldependent – on stellar age. Such results confirm previous expectations that asteroseismology of solartype KASC survey targets is possible down to apparent magnitudes of 11 and fainter, provided we work with a multimonth time series (e.g., Stello et al. 2009b).
The peakbagging results presented in Sect. 4.5 are based on the analysis of data from the first seven months of observations. A smaller number of individual fitters also analysed the tenmonthlong time series (from Q0 to Q4). In spite of realization noise being expected to scale as (Libbrecht 1992; Toutain & Appourchaux 1994; Stahn & Gizon 2008) thus making it possible to increase measurement precisions, there was barely any gain in terms of the number of modes detected. This is actually not surprising as, once a mode is resolved, the backgroundtosignal ratio in the power spectrum cannot be improved with time (e.g., Chaplin et al. 2003). The only exceptions would be (i) a radial mode at 690.34 ± 0.23μHz for KIC 10273246, which is, however, detected with the EACF and shown in Fig. 12, and (ii) a l = 2 mode at 818.73 ± 0.23μHz for KIC 10920273.
Good agreement is found between the observed and predicted mode amplitudes for the Ftype star KIC 10273246, based on the revised scaling relation of Kjeldsen & Bedding (2011). This is a particularly interesting result that calls for further tests of this scaling relation using the large sample of Kepler stars.
Despite blending of the multiplet components of nonradial modes, i.e., ⟨ Γ ⟩ ≳ ν_{rot} (e.g., Ballot et al. 2006), we believe to be possible to impose loose constraints on the rotational splitting and stellar inclination for both stars. These constraints are based on a combined analysis involving correlation maps, P_{rot}(i) curves and estimates of P_{rot}.
The results presented here point towards KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273 being most likely evolved mainsequence stars. The global asteroseismic parameters reported for these stars, together with a detailed atmospheric analysis, should allow constraining their radius, mass and age with considerable precision (Creevey et al., in prep.). Further insight into the physics of these evolved solartype stars – based on detailed modeling and inversion techniques – is now possible due to the high quality of the seismic parameters found.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this mission is provided by NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. The authors wish to thank the entire Kepler team, without whom these results would not be possible. T.L.C. is supported by grant with reference number SFRH/BD/36240/2007 from FCT/MCTES, Portugal. This work was supported by the project PTDC/CTEAST/098754/2008 funded by FCT/MCTES, Portugal.
References
 Aigrain, S., Favata, F., & Gilmore, G. 2004, A&A, 414, 1139 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Aizenman, M., Smeyers, P., & Weigert, A. 1977, A&A, 58, 41 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Anderson, E. R., Duvall, Jr., T. L., & Jefferies, S. M. 1990, ApJ, 364, 699 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Appourchaux, T. 2011, in Asteroseismology, Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics, Vol. XXII, ed. P. L. Pallé (CUP) [arXiv:1103.5352v2] [Google Scholar]
 Appourchaux, T., Gizon, L., & RabelloSoares, M. 1998, A&AS, 132, 107 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Appourchaux, T., Michel, E., Auvergne, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 705 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Ballot, J. 2010, Astron. Nachr., 331, 933 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ballot, J., TurckChièze, S., & García, R. A. 2004, A&A, 423, 1051 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Ballot, J., García, R. A., & Lambert, P. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1281 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ballot, J., Appourchaux, T., Toutain, T., & Guittet, M. 2008, A&A, 486, 867 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Ballot, J., Barban, C., & van’t VeerMenneret, C. 2011, A&A, 531, A124 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Basu, S., Mazumdar, A., Antia, H. M., & Demarque, P. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 277 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L109 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Baudin, F., Barban, C., Belkacem, K., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, A84 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Bedding, T. R. 2011, in Asteroseismology, Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics, Vol. XXII, ed. P. L. Pallé (Cambridge University Press) [arXiv:1107.1723v1] [Google Scholar]
 Bedding, T. R., Kjeldsen, H., Arentoft, T., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 1315 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Bedding, T. R., Huber, D., Stello, D., et al. 2010a, ApJ, 713, L176 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Bedding, T. R., Kjeldsen, H., Campante, T. L., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 713, 935 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Benomar, O., Appourchaux, T., & Baudin, F. 2009a, A&A, 506, 15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Benomar, O., Baudin, F., Campante, T. L., et al. 2009b, A&A, 507, L13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Bonanno, A., Benatti, S., Claudi, R., et al. 2008, ApJ, 676, 1248 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Brown, T. M., & Gilliland, R. L. 1994, ARA&A, 32, 37 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Brown, T. M., Gilliland, R. L., Noyes, R. W., & Ramsey, L. W. 1991, ApJ, 368, 599 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A. 2011, AJ, 142, 112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Campante, T. L., Karoff, C., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 542 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Chaplin, W. J., Elsworth, Y., Isaak, G. R., et al. 2003, A&A, 398, 305 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Chaplin, W. J., Houdek, G., Karoff, C., Elsworth, Y., & New, R. 2009, A&A, 500, L21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Chaplin, W. J., Appourchaux, T., Elsworth, Y., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L169 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Chaplin, W. J., Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2011a, ApJ, 732, 54 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Chaplin, W. J., Kjeldsen, H., ChristensenDalsgaard, J., et al. 2011b, Science, 332, 213 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 ChristensenDalsgaard, J. 1993, in GONG 1992, Seismic Investigation of the Sun and Stars, ed. T. M. Brown, ASP Conf. Ser., 42, 347 [Google Scholar]
 ChristensenDalsgaard, J. 2004, Sol. Phys., 220, 137 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 ChristensenDalsgaard, J., Kjeldsen, H., Brown, T. M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L164 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Cunha, M. S., & Metcalfe, T. S. 2007, ApJ, 666, 413 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Cunha, M. S., Aerts, C., ChristensenDalsgaard, J., et al. 2007, A&ARv, 14, 217 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Deheuvels, S., Bruntt, H., Michel, E., et al. 2010a, A&A, 515, A87 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Deheuvels, S., Michel, E., Goupil, M. J., et al. 2010b, A&A, 514, A31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Dziembowski, W. 1977, Acta Astron., 27, 203 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Dziembowski, W., & Goode, P. R. 1985, ApJ, 296, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 García, R. A., TurckChièze, S., Boumier, P., et al. 2005, A&A, 442, 385 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 García, R. A., Mathur, S., Salabert, D., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 1032 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 García, R. A., Hekker, S., Stello, D., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 414, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gaulme, P., Appourchaux, T., & Boumier, P. 2009, A&A, 506, 7 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Gilliland, R. L., Brown, T. M., ChristensenDalsgaard, J., et al. 2010a, PASP, 122, 131 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gilliland, R. L., Jenkins, J. M., Borucki, W. J., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 713, L160 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gizon, L., & Solanki, S. K. 2003, ApJ, 589, 1009 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gould, B. A. 1855, AJ, 4, 81 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Grec, G., Fossat, E., & Pomerantz, M. A. 1983, Sol. Phys., 82, 55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gruberbauer, M., Kallinger, T., Weiss, W. W., & Guenther, D. B. 2009, A&A, 506, 1043 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Handberg, R., & Campante, T. L. 2011, A&A, 527, A56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Harvey, J. 1985, in Future Missions in Solar, Heliospheric & Space Plasma Physics, ed. E. Rolfe, & B. Battrick, ESA SP235, 199 [Google Scholar]
 Hekker, S., Broomhall, A., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2049 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Houdek, G., & Gough, D. O. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 861 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Houdek, G., Balmforth, N. J., ChristensenDalsgaard, J., & Gough, D. O. 1999, A&A, 351, 582 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Huber, D., Stello, D., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2009, Comm. Asteroseismol., 160, 74 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Jenkins, J. M., Caldwell, D. A., Chandrasekaran, H., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L87 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 JiménezReyes, S. J., Chaplin, W. J., García, R. A., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1780 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kallinger, T., Mosser, B., Hekker, S., et al. 2010a, A&A, 522, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Kallinger, T., Weiss, W. W., Barban, C., et al. 2010b, A&A, 509, A77 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Karoff, C., Metcalfe, T. S., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 914 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Karoff, C., Campante, T. L., & Chaplin, W. J. 2010, Astron. Nachr., in press [arXiv:1003.4167v1] [Google Scholar]
 Kjeldsen, H., & Bedding, T. R. 1995, A&A, 293, 87 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Kjeldsen, H., & Bedding, T. R. 2011, A&A, 529, L8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., Baldry, I. K., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1483 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Latham, D. W., Brown, T. M., Monet, D. G., et al. 2005, in BAAS, 37, 1340 [Google Scholar]
 Ledoux, P. 1951, ApJ, 114, 373 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Libbrecht, K. G. 1992, ApJ, 387, 712 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Liddle, A. R. 2009, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 59, 95 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Mathur, S., García, R. A., Catala, C., et al. 2010a, A&A, 518, A53 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Mathur, S., García, R. A., Régulo, C., et al. 2010b, A&A, 511, A46 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Mathur, S., Handberg, R., Campante, T. L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 95 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Metcalfe, T. S., Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G., Thompson, M. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1583 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Michel, E., Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 558 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Michel, E., Samadi, R., Baudin, F., et al. 2009, A&A, 495, 979 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G., ChristensenDalsgaard, J., & Thompson, M. J. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 165 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Mosser, B. 2010, Astron. Nachr., 331, 944 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Mosser, B., & Appourchaux, T. 2009, A&A, 508, 877 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Mosser, B., Belkacem, K., Goupil, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 517, A22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Osaki, Y. 1975, PASJ, 27, 237 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Peirce, B. 1852, AJ, 2, 161 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Press, W. H., & Rybicki, G. B. 1989, ApJ, 338, 277 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Roxburgh, I. W. 2009, A&A, 506, 435 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Roxburgh, I. W., & Vorontsov, S. V. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1491 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Samadi, R., Georgobiani, D., Trampedach, R., et al. 2007, A&A, 463, 297 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Stahn, T., & Gizon, L. 2008, Sol. Phys., 251, 31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Stello, D., Bruntt, H., Kjeldsen, H., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 584 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Stello, D., Chaplin, W. J., Basu, S., Elsworth, Y., & Bedding, T. R. 2009a, MNRAS, 400, L80 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Stello, D., Chaplin, W. J., Bruntt, H., et al. 2009b, ApJ, 700, 1589 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Tassoul, M. 1980, ApJS, 43, 469 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Toutain, T., & Appourchaux, T. 1994, A&A, 289, 649 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Vandakurov, Y. V. 1967, AZh, 44, 786 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Verner, G. A., Elsworth, Y., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3539 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 White, T. R., Brewer, B. J., Bedding, T. R., Stello, D., & Kjeldsen, H. 2010, Commun. Asteroseismol., 161, 39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Appendix A: Implementing Peirce’s criterion
Peirce’s criterion is an exact rule for the rejection of doubtful observations derived from the fundamental principles of probability theory. Quoting Peirce (1852): “The proposed observations should be rejected when the probability of the system of errors obtained by retaining them is less than that of the system of errors obtained by their rejection multiplied by the probability of making so many, and no more, abnormal observations”.
Logic calls for an iterative assessment of the rejection when one or more observations are rejected. The iteration stops when no further improvement is possible. Based on the work of Gould (1855), we have implemented Peirce’s criterion as follows:

1.
compute the mean, , and the standard deviation, σ, for the observational sample { x_{i} } ;

2.
compute the rejection factor r from Gould (1855) assuming one doubtful observation;

3.
reject observations satisfying ;

4.
if n observations are rejected then compute a new rejection factor r assuming n + 1 doubtful observations;

5.
repeat steps 3 to 4 until the number of rejected observations no longer increases.
All Tables
The minimal and maximal frequency sets of observed oscillation frequencies for KIC 10273246.
The minimal and maximal frequency sets of observed oscillation frequencies for KIC 10920273.
Linewidths, heights, and bolometric amplitudes of radial modes for KIC 10273246 returned by the best fit (these are not provided for the radial mode of highest frequency since convergence was not properly achieved).
Linewidths, heights, and bolometric amplitudes of radial modes for KIC 10920273 returned by the best fit.
All Figures
Fig. 1 Rawflux time series corrected only for outliers (top panel) and corrected relative time series (bottom panel) for the case of KIC 10273246. Vertical dashed lines mark the beginning of each Quarter, whereas vertical dotted lines separate the segments within a Quarter. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 2 Rawflux time series (corrected only for outliers) of Quarter 2 for the case of KIC 10273246. Vertical dotted lines separate the three segments of Q2. The induced thermal drift after a safemode event is visible between the 60th and 70th days. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 3 Lowfrequency end – between 0.1 and 3μHz – of the power density spectrum of KIC 10273246. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 4 Similar to Fig. 3 but for the case of KIC 10920273. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 5 Power density spectra – smoothed over 1μHz in order to enhance pmode visibility – of KIC 10273246 (top panel) and KIC 10920273 (bottom panel), plotted on a loglog scale. The solid black lines represent the fits described in the text. The remaining lines represent different components of the fitting model: the power envelope due to oscillations added to the offset from white noise (dashed), and granulation (dotted). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 6 Observed relation between Δν and ν_{max}. Here we reproduce Fig. 2 of Stello et al. (2009a) in linear scale, where only stars whose ν_{max} is greater than the Nyquist frequency for longcadence sampling are displayed. The solid line is the powerlaw fit in their Eq. (1) with the corresponding ± 15% deviations shown as dotted lines. We added to the plot the two stars being considered in this study (fivepointed stars), the two stars (squares) of Mathur et al. (2011), and the three bright Gtype stars (triangles) of Chaplin et al. (2010). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 7 Échelle diagram of the power density spectrum of KIC 10273246 (the colorbar decodes the power density level). The minimal (filled symbols) and maximal (filled and open symbols) frequency sets are displayed. Symbol shapes indicate mode degree: l = 0 (circles), l = 1 (triangles) and l = 2 (squares). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 8 Similar to Fig. 7 but for the case of KIC 10920273. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 9 pg diagram showing the frequencies of avoided crossings (diamonds) plotted against the large separation for a number of stars. The vertical lines show the range over which the l = 1 ridge is clearly seen. The inclined line is the observed relation between Δν and ν_{max} of Stello et al. (2009a). For KIC 10273246 there are two clear avoided crossings, whereas for KIC 10920273 there is only one clear crossing plus another likely one (open symbol). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 10 Linewidths of the radial modes returned for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273 by the respective best fit. Modes represented by open symbols belong exclusively to the maximal frequency set. Dotdashed lines mark the predicted mean linewidths of the most prominent modes using Eq. (9). The horizontal dimension of the linefilled areas represents the uncertainty in ν_{max}. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 11 Heights of the radial modes returned for KIC 10273246 and KIC 10920273 by the respective best fit, plotted on a loglinear scale. Modes represented by open symbols belong exclusively to the maximal frequency set. Also indicated is the SNR of the strongest modes as well as the background fits of Fig. 5 (dotted lines). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 12 Variation of Δν_{odd} and Δν_{even} with frequency for KIC 10273246. The dashed line corresponds to the odd ridge, whereas the solid line corresponds to the even ridge. Error bars are given with the same linestyles. Proxies of the mode frequencies derived with the EACF have been superimposed and their values appended: l = 0 (circles) and l = 1 (triangles). The inset shows the comb filter used in the analysis. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 13 Similar to Fig. 12 but for the case of KIC 10920273. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 14 Twodimensional posterior probability distribution of ν_{rot} and i for KIC 10273246 (the colorbar decodes the probability density level). The prior on i is uniform over the plotted range, whereas the prior on ν_{rot} is uniform over the interval 0–2μHz with a decaying Gaussian wing for higher values of the splitting. The dotdashed line marks the estimate of the stellar rotational period given in Sect. 4.2. Furthermore, the P_{rot}(i) relation (solid curve) of Creevey et al. (in preparation) is shown together with the corresponding confidence interval (dotted curves). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 15 Similar to Fig. 14 but for the case of KIC 10920273. Given the possibility that vsini ≈ 0km s^{1}, the lower bound of the confidence interval of P_{rot}(i) will coincide with the horizontal axis. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.