Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 527, March 2011
Article Number A88
Number of page(s) 40
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014974
Published online 31 January 2011

© ESO, 2011

1. Introduction

Massive stars play an important role in determining physical, chemical, and morphological properties of galaxies. The last decade has seen considerable progress in the understanding of massive star-formation (Zinnecker & Yorke 2007). Since their detection by Perault et al. (1996) and Egan et al. (1998), cold and dense infrared dark clouds (IRDCs) appear to be the ideal sites to investigate the initial conditions for the process of massive star-formation. Infrared dark clouds have typical sizes between 1 and 10 pc, masses from several hundreds to several thousands solar masses and H2 column densities between 2 and 10 × 1023 cm-2 (e.g. Rathborne et al. 2006; Vasyunina et al. 2009; Ragan et al. 2009).

Apart from continuum observations, molecular line data have been used to characterize the properties of IRDCs. The first molecular line data were obtained by Carey et al. (1998), who detected H2CO in 10 clouds, thus confirming the presence of dense gas. Using a large velocity gradient (LVG) model they estimated H2CO abundances of  ~10-10. That is a factor of 50 lower compared with low-density clouds and can be explained by accretion of gas-phase metals onto dust grains in the cold and dense IRDCs. Ammonia observations by Sridharan et al. (2005) and Pillai et al. (2006) allowed a temperature determination of IRDCs in a range from 10 to 20 K.

While earlier studies (Simon et al. 2006) suggested the association of most IRDCs with the so-called Galactic molecular ring (galactocentric distance of 5 kpc), the Jackson et al. (2008) study gave new evidence that the IRDC distribution in the first and fourth galactic quadrant more closely follows a galactic spiral arm (the Scutum-Centaurus arm). Because in normal spiral galaxies OB stars seem to form primarily in spiral arms, the association of IRDCs with a Milky Way spiral arm supports the idea that IRDCs are related to high-mass star formation.

Sakai et al. (2008) observed N2H+(1−0), HC3N(5−4), CCS(43−32), NH3(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), and CH3OH(7−6) lines toward the massive clumps associated with IRDCs to study the chemical conditions in IRDCs. Analyzing the CCS and N2H+ abundance ratio, they conclude that infrared dark clouds are chemicaly more evolved than low-mass pre-stellar cores.

An estimate of the chemical evolutionary status of IRDCs was performed also by Gibson et al. (2009). Using C18O, CS, and N2H+ abundances and a chemical evolution code, they showed that cores where all three lines are detected appear to be chemically young (104.5 < t < 105.5 years). Cores where no N2H+ emission is detected are suspected to be especially young (t < 102 years). This suggests that these regions may not yet have formed massive protostars.

A molecular survey by Sakai et al. (2010) toward 20 massive clumps including mid-IR bright and mid-IR dark sources showed outflow activities and the possible presence of protostars in some clouds. Their line width analysis allowed the authors to reconstruct the distribution of the molecular species at the different evolutionary stages of massive clumps.

While many characteristics of infrared dark clouds were determined during the last ten years, some of their properties are still not well known. Among the open questions is the chemical state of these clouds. What is the chemistry in IRDCs? Is it really different from the chemistry in low-mass dark clouds?

To enlarge the sample of well characterized IRDCs, we started a program to study gas and dust properties of southern infrared dark clouds (Vasyunina et al. 2009, Paper I hereafter). A set of 15 clouds was selected in the pre-Spitzer era by visual examination of the extinction contrast of the MSX 8.3 μm images. In the meantime, the Spitzer satellite has succeeded MSX and provided a far higher spatial resolution and sensitivity. GLIMPSE mid-infrared images of our regions were retrieved from the Spitzer Archive. Continuum 1.2 mm maps were obtained with the SIMBA bolometer array at the SEST telescope. A 1.2 mm and 8 μm study of these southern IRDCs showed that these objects are not just distant Taurus-like clouds, but a distinct type of clouds with a clear trend to higher H2 column densities. It was found that the true peak column densities, extracted from millimeter data, exceed 3 × 1023 cm-2 (or 1 g cm-2), which has been proposed as a threshold for high-mass star–forming clouds (Krumholz & McKee 2008).

This paper is our next step toward the understanding of the nature of the IRDCs. Here we present our investigations of the chemical composition of southern clouds. We perform molecular line observations in the 3 mm band with the Mopra single-dish radio telescope. Combining molecular line data and H2 column densities from the previous study we estimate molecular abundances and compare them with results for low-mass pre-stellar cores. The analysis of molecular lines provides not only information about chemistry, but also about physical processes in molecular clouds. For instance, the presence of SiO emission and HCO+ extended wings is evidence for outflow activity in a cloud. Specific line shapes can indicate infall motion. Detection or non-detection of some species helps to determine the evolutionary status of our targets.

The paper is organized in the following way. In Sect. 2 we describe our target selection, the selected molecular lines, observational and technical details. In Sect. 3 we present the results of the qualitative analysis of obtained molecular line spectra, line parameters and abundance estimates. We discuss the obtained results in Sect. 4 and conclude in Sect. 5.

2. Target and line selection, observations, and data reduction

2.1. Target selection

A sample of 15 southern infrared dark clouds was selected by visual examination of the MSX 8.3 μm images for the presence of high-contrast dark clouds. 1.2 mm continuum data were obtained for these objects with the SIMBA/SEST telescope. Together with millimeter data we used 8 μm IRAC data from the Spitzer Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE, Benjamin et al. 2003) to investigate the physical properties of the extinction and emission material (see Paper I). Based on our millimeter and mid-IR data and taking into account single-dish beam sizes at millimeter wavelengths, we selected several points for observations in every cloud. The criterion for selection was the presence of either a 1.2 mm emission peak, a 8 μm emission peak, or a 8 μm extinction peak. These criteria let us cover IRDCs at the different evolutionary stages. Millimeter emission and mid-IR extinction indicate the presence of cold gas, which is typical for more quiescent regions. A typical source of 8 μm emission usually contains a small infrared cluster and is therefore likely to be at a more advanced evolutionary stage than most dark regions in this IRAC band. The targets are listed in Table 1. Three-color Spitzer/GLIMPSE images of IRDCs together with the telescope and beam positions are presented in the on-line material Fig. A.1.

Table 1

List of observed IRDCs.

2.2. Line selection

In order to probe the dense and cold gas in IRDCs, we need appropriate tracers. The 3-mm band offers a large selection of molecular transitions. In particular, rotational transitions with low quantum numbers are accessible. Below we introduce the 3-mm lines we selected for our study.

N2H+: this species is known to be a selective tracer of quiescent gas (e.g., Caselli et al. 2002) and is particularly suitable for studying the structure and kinematics of cold star-forming cores. The hyperfine structure allows us to reliably measure the optical depth. N2H+ is known to be a “late depleter”, thus it is not strongly affected by freeze-out on grain surfaces (which prevents the use of the more common CO or CS transition). This makes it a robust tool for scrutinizing the highly structured interiors of massive star-forming regions where warm massive protostars could co-exist with younger cold and massive cloud cores. N2H+ has been – detected in both low- and high- mass pre-stellar cores and infrared dark clouds (e.g., Lee et al. 2001; Pirogov et al. 2003; Fuller et al. 2005; Ragan et al. 2006).

13CS: this molecule is a very good tracer of dense gas (e.g., Bronfman et al. 1996) because of its high dipole moment. It was detected in low-mass pre-stellar cores (e.g., Tafalla et al. 2002) and high-mass star-forming regions (e.g., Jones et al. 2008). In contrast to N2H+, in cold dark clouds the CS emission vanishes toward the core center because of depletion, but it can be used to trace layers surrounding the central cores.

CH3CN: this molecule is considered to be a tracer of warm and dense regions (e.g., Kalenskii et al. 2000; Araya et al. 2005; Viti 2005). Chemical models involving only gas phase reactions and also models which take into account grain-surface chemistry show that CH3CN is only detectable in an environment with elevated temperatures (see Purcell et al. 2006 and references therein). It was detected in more evolved massive star-formation regions, such as Sgr B2 (Jones et al. 2008) or G305.2+0.2 (Walsh & Burton 2006), thus confirming the theoretical predictions. We include CH3CN in our “cold-gas-survey”, because among infrared dark points we have quite a significant number of regions where star-formation processes may have already started.

HC3N: this molecule belongs to an important group of interstellar molecules – the cyanopolyynes, HC2n+1N. and is a valuable tracer of physical conditions in molecular clouds. Since its first detection in space (Turner 1971), HC3N has been found in every type of molecular cloud from giant molecular clouds associated with H II regions to circumstellar envelopes. It was shown that HC3N transitions have low optical depth and indicate the presence of denser gas than other high-density tracers (Bergin et al. 1996).

HNC: this molecule is a commonly used tracer of dense gas in molecular clouds. The abundance ratio HCN/HNC strongly depends on the temperature and for the Orion molecular cloud decreases from 80 near the warm core to 5 on the colder edges (Goldsmith et al. 1986; Schilke et al. 1992). The recent theoretical work by Sarrasin et al. (2010) confirmed that this ratio should be around one for cold molecular clouds. This line is a triplet, but the spread of the hyperfine components is only 0.21 MHz or 0.4 km s-1.

HCO+ and H13CO+: HCO+ is known to be a good tracer of the dense gas especially of embedded molecular outflows (e.g., Codella et al. 2001; Hofner et al. 2001). HCO+ is an abundant molecule, with particularly enhanced abundances around regions of higher fractional ionization. It is also enhanced by outflows where shock-generated radiation fields are present (Rawlings et al. 2000, 2004).

Table 2

Observed molecular species.

The emission from the H13CO+ isotopologue is mostly optically thin and traces similar gas densities as HCO+. A comparison between the generally optically thick HCO+ line and the optically thin H13CO+ line yields information on the bulk motion of the gas in the region.

HCN and H13CN: this molecule has been suggested as a ubiquitous high-density gas tracer. Moreover, the HCN molecule is known to be a good tracer of infall motions in low-mass star-forming regions. However, for the high-mass cores this can be different. Here HCN may become an unreliable infall tracer because of a higher level of turbulence (Redman et al. 2008) and outflow signatures (Zhang et al. 2007).

HNCO: Zinchenko et al. (2000) showed that HNCO integrated intensities correlate well with those of thermal SiO emission in massive clouds. This can indicate a spatial coexistence of the two species and may hint at a common production mechanism, presumably based on shock chemistry.

C2H: chemical models predict that C2H is only well centered on the sources when they are very young. At later stages it is destroyed in the central cores, but is replenished in the outer shells (Beuther et al. 2008).

SiO: it can trace shocked gas potentially associated with energetic young outflows. Hence, this line can reveal star-formation activity even for cores where no Spitzer/MIPS sources are apparent (e.g., Lo et al. 2007). For a few of our IRDCs we have indications from Spitzer/GLIMPSE imaging that shocked gas exists, often, but not exclusively, at the edges of the IRDCs. Tracers are the “green fuzzies” found in the 4.5 μm GLIMPSE channel (Cyganowski et al. 2008; Chambers et al. 2009) and generally attributed to pure rotational IR lines of H2 (De Buizer & Vacca 2010).

CH3C2H: a good tracer of dense gas appropriate for early stages of star-forming regions (Bergin et al. 1994). This molecule can be used as a good thermometer in a dense environment.

The covered molecular lines and transitions are summarized in Table 2.

2.3. Mopra observations and data reduction

The observations were made with the 22-m Mopra radio telescope, operated by the Australia Telescope National Facility (ATNF) in position switching mode. In total we spent 7 min on source and 7 min on the OFF position. Our targets are dense molecular condensations within larger molecular clouds with often widespread molecular emission. Therefore, we refrained from using one standard OFF position throw. Instead, OFF positions were chosen individually for every target region and were approximately 8−10′ away from the source.

The Mopra spectrometer (MOPS) offers zoom-mode configurations with the possibility to observe up to 16 sub-bands of 138 MHz each within a total frequency range of 8.3 GHz. This set-up delivers a velocity resolution of  ~0.11 km s-1.

The observations were carried out on 9−11 May 2008 with the 3 mm band receiver. We put the central frequency for the 8.3 GHz block to 89 270 MHz and thus covered the range from 85 to 93 GHz. In this range we distributed 13 zoom windows, which covered the lines listed in Table 2.

System temperature measurements were performed every 30 min and a pointing scan every hour. Typical system temperatures (measured with the common chopper-wheel technique) during the observations were 170−210 K. At Mopra observatory, SiO masers are used to correct the telescope pointing, giving a pointing accuracy better than 10′′. The main beam of the telescope varies between 36′′ at 86 GHz and 33′′ at 115 GHz and the main beam efficiency varies between 0.49 at 86 GHz and 0.44 at 100 GHz (Ladd et al. 2005)

Mopra data are originally stored in RPFITS format. Using the ATNF Spectral line Analysis package (ASAP), we transformed these raw data into ascii files, which were then fed into GILDAS for further analysis. The typical rms level in the obtained spectra is about 0.12−0.16 K. We give 1σ errors in Tables C.1C.8.

3. Results

3.1. Qualitative assessment

Figure 1 presents the average spectrum of an infrared dark cloud. To produce it we shifted the spectra of all our IRDCs to the same reference velocity and averaged spectra for each species with equal weight. The “average spectra” technique enables us to reduce the noise level and recognize weak lines, which are not detectable in the single spectra. Spectra for every single point are available in the on-line material (see Fig. B.1). For all IRDCs we have quite strong and clear detections of the HNC, HCO+ and HCN molecules. In all cases we see a non-Gaussian shape of HCO+ with “shoulders” or double-peaked profiles. We will discuss the asymmetries of HCO+ in comparison with the optically thin H13CO+ line in Sect. 3.3 in more detail.

N2H+ is detected everywhere, except for IRDC309.37-2. As expected, we cannot distinguish all seven hyperfine components because of the large line width. While one hyperfine component (101−012) constitutes a distinct line peak, the other six transitions merge into two satellites.

HC3N, HNCO and C2H show rather weak emission and were detected in 18, 13, and 24 positions, respectively.

According to the previous studies (e.g. Ragan et al. 2006; Jackson et al. 2008), CS is a common molecule in IRDCs. Still, we detected only very weak 13CS(2−1) emission in three clouds. The low detection rate of 13CS(2−1) in our case can be explained by 50 times less abundant 13CS in comparison with CS. Also depletion of CS (and 13CS) can play a significant role here (Beuther & Henning 2009). Another molecule, CH3C2H, was detected only in IRDC316.76-1 and IRDC317.71-2 and shows very weak emission in IRDC316.72-1, IRDC316.72-2 and IRDC316.76-2.

Even in the most evolved regions IRDC316.76-1 and IRDC316.76-2, where there is strong mid-IR and millimeter emission, we detected no CH3CN as a typical hot core tracer. Because CH3CN emission arises from a warm and compact region, one explanation of this non-detection can be the low spatial resolution of the telescope and the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio in our spectra. Using the “average spectra” technique, we were able to reduce the noise level and to find very weak CH3CN emission (see Fig. 1). This detection indicates that CH3CN is present at least in some parts of our clouds, but there is an abundance deficit for this molecule in IRDCs. This result agrees with the previous work by Beuther & Sridharan (2007).

According to Cyganowski et al. (2008) and Chambers et al. (2009) it is more likely to see SiO as an outflow tracer in the clouds where there is emission both at 4.5 and 24 μm. However, we detected SiO lines with extended line wings only in three regions with mid-IR emission: IRDC313.72-1, IRDC313.72-2 and IRDC316.76-1. Other potentially interesting regions with emission in mid-IR either show very weak SiO emission (IRDC317.71-2, IRDC309.94-1), or no SiO emission at all (IRDC309.37-1, IRDC310.39-2). The strongest SiO line was detected in the IRDC321.73-1. Within the Mopra beam this region contains a very weak source at 24 μm and emission at GLIMPSE 4.5 μm so weak that it was not identified as extended green objects (EGOs) in Cyganowski et al. (2008). We classify this object as “middle” (see below). Detection of SiO emission in this source indicates that absence or extreme weakness of mid-IR emission does not mean that star-formation processes are not taking place in a cloud (cf. Lo et al. 2007) and shows the necessity of spectral line observations to identify outflows and star-formation activity in molecular clouds.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Average spectrum. Obtained by averaging all spectra for every species with equal weight after shifting all of them to the same reference velocity. Several weak detections are amplified by a factor of 10, and CH3CN is amplified by a factor of 20 for plotting.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Line spectra for different mid-IR categories of IRDCs. (left) “Quiescent” cloud, (middle) “middle” cloud, (right) “active” cloud.

Based on mid-infrared Spitzer data, Chambers et al. (2009) subdivided infrared dark clouds cores into “active” and “quiescent”. Cores were classified as “active” if they showed emission both at 8 and 24 μm, and as “quiescent” if they contained neither IR emission signatures. We added a “middle” stage to this classification whenever detect emission at 24 micron only and not at the shorter wavelength (see Table 1). In the Fig. 2 we present the spectra for typical clouds from every category. Chambers et al. (2009) have shown that “active” cores have smaller sizes, higher densities, and more pronounced water and methanol maser activity than the “quiescent” cores. However, from the qualitative analysis of the Mopra spectra, we do not see clear molecular signatures of any of these three categories of sources.

3.2. Line parameters

Using the GILDAS/CLASS software, we fitted the whole N2H+ structure, which resulted in local standard of rest (LSR) velocities, full linewidths at half maximum, and optical depths (Tables C.1). For the lines where there is no hyperfine splitting (13CS, HC3N, HCO+, HNCO, SiO, H13CO+), or the hyperfine structure cannot be resolved (HNC), we estimate integrated and peak line intensities, LSR velocities and full linewidths at half maximum from Gaussian fits (Tables C.2C.8). For all lines we estimated integrated areas, measured by summing the channels between suitable velocity limits under the line (Table C.9). To compare our results with the line parameters of other IRDCs, low-mass starless cores and more evolved high-mass clouds we chose N2H+. This line has a relatively simple line shape – without extended shoulders and self-absorption features, and is detected in 97% of the clouds. Moreover, N2H+ is widely detected in low- and high-mass pre-stellar and protostellar cores.

We find that the line widths for our IRDCs vary in the range from 0.6 to 2.8 km s-1 and agree with the results obtained for other IRDCs by Ragan et al. (2006), where the line width was 0.5−4.0 km s-1 with the mean value 2.2 km s-1. In low-mass pre-stellar cores (Lee et al. 2001) strong N2H+ emission was detected in 75% of the objects. Lines in low-mass regions are narrow with line widths in the range of  ~0.2−0.4 km s-1 and a mean value of 0.3 km s-1, which corresponds to the thermal linewidth. High-mass protostellar objects show N2H+ emission in all selected targets (Pirogov et al. 2003; Fuller et al. 2005). Compared with low-mass cores, these targets have broader lines 0.5−3.5 km s-1. Figure 3 presents the distribution of the N2H+ line width for all three types of objects.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Distribution of N2H+ line width for our IRDCs sample, more evolved regions from Pirogov et al. (2003) and low-mass pre-stellar cores from Lee et al. (2001).

Broader IRDC lines can indicate more turbulent processes within clouds. However, a 36′′ beam corresponds to 0.17 pc at 1 kpc distance and 0.9 pc at 5 kpc. Thus, increasingly higher volumes are covered by the same beam for regions farther away and may therefore offer a simple explanation for larger line widths. To check if the line widths become larger for more distant clouds, we plot in Fig. 4 the line width against the kinematic distance. For this comparison we use our N2H+ data from the Table C.1. For our objects the correlation coefficient between the two parameters is only 0.2. Thus, large line widths of high-mass clouds cannot be explained exclusively by the large distances. In the same vein, clumping, which can easily be hidden within a 36′′ beam, can only partly explain these elevated line widths (Pillai et al. 2006). The linewidth – size relationship also cannot explain high line width values in IRDCs. Heyer et al. (2001) report that a clear line width – size relation is only observed in larger clouds complexes of  >10 pc in size. The IRDC clumps targeted by us are much smaller with typical sizes of around 1 pc. Furthermore, previous studies have already indicated that the line widths in high-mass star–forming clumps are much higher than would be predicted by the usual relations between line width and size determined from regions of lower mass (e.g. Shirley et al. 2003).

thumbnail Fig. 4

Comparison between N2H+ line width and kinematic distance to the objects for our IRDCs sample.

Comparing line parameters for “quiescent”, “middle” and “active” regions, we can see that there is a trend to have larger line widths and higher integrated intensities in more evolved objects. The mean line widths are 1.4, 1.7 and 2.2 km s-1 and the integrated intensities are 4.7, 7.1 and 20.6 K km s-1 for “quiescent”, “middle” and “active” sources respectively. These results agree well with Chambers et al. (2009), who concluded that “active” sources are more evolved and present further evolutionary stages compared with “quiescent” sources.

We also utilized N2H+ to estimate kinematic distances to our objects (see Table 1). For IRDC309.37-2 the N2H+ line was not detected and we used HCO+ to estimate the distance. Because we observed several points within one cloud, the distance determination helps us to confirm that clumps with associated mid-IR emission in IRDC309.37, IRDC310.39 and IRDC371.71 are connected with the other “dark” parts of the respective clouds and are not only a projection effect.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Number distribution of δV = (VHCO + VH13CO + ) / ΔVH13CO +  for our sample (see Sect. 3.3). Dashed lines indicate the  ± 5σδV level.

3.3. HCO+ and H13CO+ line profiles

thumbnail Fig. 6

Samples of the HCO+ and H13CO+ line profiles. The vertical lines indicate the Vlsr positions measured from H13CO+ line profiles.

As already mentioned, the HCO+ lines show a non-Gaussian profile in almost all clouds. In some cases even its isotopoloque H13CO+ has a complicated line shape. Moreover, we see a significant shift, up to 2 km s-1, between the peak positions of the optically thick HCO+ line and optically thin H13CO+. A quantitative estimate of this asymmetry could provide us with information about dynamical processes in the clouds.

The most common way to extract line asymmetries is based on the comparison of optically thin and optically thick line positions: δV = (VthickVthin) / ΔVthin (Mardones et al. 1997). This estimate was widely used both for low- and high-mass star-formation regions. (Fuller et al. 2005; Pirogov et al. 2003; Purcell et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2001). With this criterion, we can subdivide our IRDCs in to “blue shifted” clouds with δV < 0 and “red shifted” clouds with δV > 0. The blue excess could be caused by infall motions and the red excess by expanding motions or outflow. Among the sources where both HCO+ and H13CO+ were detected, we identified 19 “blue shifted” and 12 “red shifted” clouds (Fig. 5, Table C.8). In order to exclude the sources where differences between the Vlsr values for different species are dominated by measurement errors, we have to determine the threshold value. For the low-mass starless cores Mardones et al. (1997) determined this threshold as 5σ, where σ is the typical δV error. In our case H13CO+, which we use as optically thin component, is quite weak for some sources, which leads to the 5σ value equal 0.5. Most of our clouds have  |δV|  < 0.5, only four objects show a sufficient blue shift, and six a red shift. From these 10 candidates we also have to exclude sources with very weak and/or noisy spectra. After this selection we determine one infall candidate: IRDC313.72-4, and three sources show evidence of expanding motions: IRDC317.71-1, IRDC317.71-2 and IRDC317.71-3. However, this method allows us only to identify infall or outflow candidates, but does not provide any quantitative values (e.g. infall speed).

Another method to estimate line asymmetries quantitatively was described in Myers et al. (1996). They used an analytic two-layer radiative transfer model to obtain theoretical spectra, compare them with the wide range of observed double-peak profiles and extract a formula for infall speed (see Eq. (9) from Myers et al. 1996). This method allows us to estimate the infall velocity in a cloud by measuring blue and red peak parameters of the optically thick line. Among all our targets we selected three clouds with clear red shoulders in HCO+ and non-complicated shape of H13CO+ (see Fig. 6). The estimated infall velocities are around 2 km s-1. This value is much higher than the sound speed in such an environment – 0.3 km s-1, or a typical infall speed for low-mass pre-stellar cores 0.05−0.09 km s-1 (Lee et al. 2001).

Table 3

Abundances of the IRDCs. a(b) denotes a × 10b.

3.4. Derived quantities: column densities and abundances

To estimate column densities we assume LTE conditions and optically thin emission and use the equation (1)where λ is the rest wavelength of the transition, A is the Einstein coefficient, gu is the upper state degeneracy, Jν(Tex) and Jν(Tbg) are the equivalent Rayleigh-Jeans excitation and background temperatures, Qrot is the partition function, and El is the energy of the lower level (Lee et al. 2009). In our calculations for gu, A and El we used values from The Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy (CDMS) (Müller et al. 2001, 2005) (Table 2). For the excitation temperatures Tex in all cases, except HCO+ and H13CO+ (see below), we assume ammonia kinetic temperatures (Linz et al., in prep.) (Table 1). We calculate the partition function Qrot for every source by interpolating data from the CDMS for the particular source temperature Tex.

Integrated intensities for every species were measured by summing the channels between suitable velocity limits under the corresponding molecular line (Table C.9).

The optically thin assumption is suitable for most of our lines: 13CS, HC3N, HNCO, C2H, SiO, H13CO+, H13CN, CH3C2H. For optically thick emission (e.g. HCN, HCO+, HNC) Eq. (1) gives only a lower limit. However, for N2H+ and HCO+ we can make a better column density estimation. In the case of N2H+ we use the advantage of the hyperfine structure and estimate optical depths from the hyperfine components fitting. Then column densities for N2H+ can be calculated by multiplying Eq. (1) by a factor of τ / (1−eτ). For HCO+ the presence of an optically thin isotopoloque allows us to estimate more realistic values for HCO+. Using an algorithm described in Purcell et al. (2006) and assuming that HCO+ is optically thick, H13CO+ is optically thin and their relative abundance ratio X =  [HCO + ]  /  [H13CO + ]  equals 50, we calculated HCO+ column densities for the sources, where both HCO+ and H13CO+ lines were detected. We do not apply the same algorithm for the pair HCN-H13CN, because H13CN is detected only in four objects. In spite of non-detection of CH3CN in any single spectra, the “average spectra” technique lets us recognize the very weak CH3CN (50−40) and CH3CN (51−41) lines (see Fig. 1). We use this averaged spectrum to estimate the integrated intensity and derive the upper limit column density for this species.

To transfer column densities to abundances we use the N(species)/N(H2) ratio, where N(H2) values were estimated from the 1.2 mm SIMBA/SEST data (Paper I) adopting the Mopra telescope beam size (see Table 1). For CH3CN we use the average value for the molecular hydrogen column density of 1.2 × 1022 cm-2 and derived upper limit for CH3CN abundances of 4.0. × 10-11. Abundances for other species are presented in Table 3.

For our column density and abundance estimates, systematic errors play the dominant role. One aspect is the assumption that all lines are optically thin. For moderately optically thick lines, the true column densities may be higher by a factor of 2−3 for our objects. We also utilize kinetic temperatures derived from ammonia observations as excitation temperatures. This can give another factor of 2−5 to the estimated values. Systematic errors are also present in the molecular hydrogen column densities, derived from the millimeter continuum measurements, where we made assumptions about the dust model and equal gas and dust temperatures. All these assumptions give rise to a systematic error of an order of magnitude in molecular abundances which we obtained.

3.5. Are the objects really cold?

To estimate kinetic temperatures in our clouds we observed the ammonia (1,1) and (2,2) inversion transitions with the Parkes radio telescope. These transitions are known as a good thermometer for cold, dense gas. We derived kinetic temperatures for most IRDCs between 10 and 30 K (Linz et al., in prep.). Ammonia observations show cold gas in IRDCs. However, the Parkes telescope beam is 72′′ or approximately 1 pc at the typical IRDCs distances. With the Mopra telescope (telescope beam 36′′) we can trace a lower volume and use other molecular lines to identify warmer regions.

One way is to consider the HCN/HNC abundance ratio. This ratio strongly depends on the temperature and for the Orion molecular cloud decreases from 80 near the warm core to 5 on the colder edges (Goldsmith et al. 1986; Schilke et al. 1992; Sarrasin et al. 2010). For our IRDC sample the estimated HCN/HNC abundance ratio values are not higher than 3. This confirms that we deal with quite cold clouds.

Besides ammonia, symmetric top molecules like CH3C2H can be used as probes of kinetic temperature in molecular clouds (Bergin et al. 1994). We detect CH3C2H in 5 targets. In two objects the 52−42, 51−41 and 50−40 components are clearly visible. This allows us to estimate rotational temperatures in these regions with the algorithm given in Bergin et al. (1994). Derived temperatures equal 17 K for IRDC317.71-2 and 38 K for IRDC316.76-1. The temperature for IRDC317.71-2 is similar to the value we have from ammonia observations, whereas the temperature for IRDC316.76-1 is 15 K higher. This indicates that in some clouds a warmer component can be present in addition to cold gas. If there is also a warm gas component and the real gas temperature in some targets is higher, we underestimated molecular abundances. The abundances for IRDC316.76-1 with T = 38 K become a factor of 1.2-1.7 higher. However, taking into account all our assumptions and the still large telescope beam, this difference is still within the error limit.

3.6. Special objects

In this subsection we present infrared dark clouds where the line spectra show some unique features.

IRDC317.71 One of the remarkable features in this object is the ratio of the HCN hyperfine components, which are different from other IRDCs (see Fig. 2). In contrast to N2H+, the HCN hyperfine component intensity ratio is not a constant value. Afonso et al. (1998) show for low-mass dark clouds that HCN hyperfine components can have different intensity ratios in different sources. For most of our IRDCs we detected that the ratios F = 2−1 to F = 0−1 and F = 2−1 to F = 1−1 components are different, but higher than 1. For IRDC317.71-1 these ratios are 0.8 and 0.4 and for IRDC317.71-2 are 0.5 and 0.2 respectively.

Another interesting feature is the large shift between H13CO+ and HCO+ emission peaks. H13CO+ emission peak is shifted to the blue side compared with HCO+ and corresponds to the extinction in the optically thick component. Also IRDC317.71-2 is one of the five locations where CH3C2H was detected. As we can see from the previous section, the CH3C2H excitation analysis shows the presence of a warmer gas component, thus indicating a more evolved star-forming region.

Most probably the HCN spectrum can be explained by foreground absorption in low-excitation molecular gas. Similar hyperfine anomalies are frequently seen in cold dark clouds where they are explained in this way (absorption in the envelope). The same effect is probably seen in HCO+. The HCO+ line asymmetry apparently indicates the velocity shift of the foreground absorption. If attributed to the envelope, this shift indicates an expansion. In addition, HCO+ perhaps traces a contribution from an outflow.

IRDC317.71-2 corresponds to the bright emission source in all mid-IR Spitzer/GLIMPSE bands. This, and all spectral features we discussed above indicates ongoing star-formation processes in IRDC317.71-2. A cross-correlation of the mid-IR data and near-IR 2MASS K-band images shows that the bright mid-IR source hides a young stellar cluster.

IRDC321.73 in IRDC321.73-1 (Fig. 2), although there is no emission in the GLIMPSE bands and only a very weak source at 24 μm, we detected clear SiO emission. This indicates the presence of a shock and probably an outflow activity in this region. The presence of the red HCO+ shoulder could be an evidence of infall motion. The other two points in this cloud (IRDC321.73-2 and IRDC321.73-3) show a more complicated than average shape of HCO+. The rest of the lines, even optically thin like N2H+, also have non-Gaussian shapes. This can be explained by the presence of several kinematic components.

4. Discussion

Carey et al. (1998) and Pillai et al. (2006) mention a difference in the ammonia and formaldehyde abundances and hence a possible chemical difference between low-mass pre-stellar cores and IRDCs. To study the chemical conditions in IRDCs, Sakai et al. (2008) observed N2H+(1−0), HC3N(5−4), CCS(43−32), NH3(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), and CH3OH(7−6) lines toward the massive clumps associated with IRDCs. They estimated the CCS and N2H+ abundance ratio and used low-mass pre-stellar core abundances from Benson et al. (1998) for the comparison. The result of this analysis showed that IRDCs have lower N(CCS)/N(N2H+) ratio values and that therefore they can be chemically more evolved than low-mass pre-stellar cores. However, Sakai et al. (2008) used particular low-mass objects for the comparison and did not take into account the pre-stellar cores L1512 and L63, where N(CCS)/N(N2H+) ratio is low and agrees with values obtained for their IRDC sample.

Here we aim to determine if the molecular abundances in IRDCs are similar to the low-mass pre-stellar cores, or whether they show signatures of more evolved evolutionary stages. To answer this question we compare our IRDC abundances with the data available in the literature for low-mass starless clouds and more evolved high-mass objects. We analyze the dispersion of the particular abundance values and the difference between mean abundances for all available species. As an additional criterion, we compare the values of the HNC/HCN abundance ratio for different types of objects.

4.1. Abundance comparison with low-mass starless cores

thumbnail Fig. 7

(Left) Comparison of the molecular abundances of the IRDCs with low-mass pre-stellar cores from Padovani et al. (2009), Tafalla et al. (2006), Jørgensen et al. (2004) and Ohishi et al. (1992). Black diamonds indicate our IRDC abundances, green diamonds indicate mean values for IRDCs. Black crosses indicate low-mass starless cores, red crosses indicate mean values for low-mass starless cores. (Right) Comparison of the molecular abundances of the IRDCs with HMPOs from Blake et al. (1987), Helmich & van Dishoeck (1997), Pirogov et al. (2003) and Zinchenko et al. (2000, 2009). Black diamonds indicate our IRDC abundances, green diamonds indicate mean values of the corresponding species for IRDCs. Black triangles indicate HMPOs, red triangles indicate mean values of the corresponding species for HMPOs. In both panels the upper limit abundance value for CH3CN for IRDCs was estimated from the average spectrum.

To make a comparison with low-mass cold clouds, we used the molecular abundances from Padovani et al. (2009), Tafalla et al. (2006), Jørgensen et al. (2004) and Ohishi et al. (1992) (Fig. 7 left panel). Comparing the dispersion of the abundance values we find that for some species, like HC3N, there is a large spread in abundance for the low-mass sample, but higher and lower values occur with regard to the IRDC values. For HNCO we compute abundances for low-mass starless cores using new results by Marcelino et al. (2009) and adopting the H2 column densities from Table 3 of Marcelino et al. (2010). That gives us quite low abundance values for B1, L1527-b, and L1544. However, cores like L183 and TMC-1 reach HNCO abundances that are overlapping with IRDC values and are just a factor of 2−3 lower than the IRDC average abundance. The same situation, in principle, is found for HCO+, where an overlap between the low-mass core and IRDC HCO+ abundances exist for the objects L183 and TMC-1 (both attaining 8.0 × 10-9 according to Ohishi et al. 1992). There is a tendency for higher abundances in IRDCs compared to low- mass cores for N2H+. However, here as well we found with L1544 a prominent example of a low-mass pre-stellar core with a rather high N2H+ abundance of 5.0 × 10-9 (Jørgensen et al. 2004).

The difference between mean abundances of IRDCs and low-mass objects is a factor of 2−3 for all species and around 5 in the extreme case of HNCO (see Table 3). Taking into account a large spread in abundances for every molecule within our IRDCs sample and systematic errors (see Sect. 3.4), these differences in average abundances between the low-mass pre-stellar cores and IRDCs cannot be used to claim a clear and unequivocal chemical distinction between the two groups of objects.

4.2. Abundance comparison with high-mass protostellar objects

The next class of objects that are interesting to compare with our results is the class of more evolved high-mass protostellar objects (HMPOs). HMPOs are bright at mid- and far-IR wavelengths and characterized by higher gas temperatures than IRDCs. It is assumed that these objects present one of the early stages of high-mass star formation, where the central protostar has a mass  >8 M and is still accreting (e.g. Sridharan et al. 2002; Beuther et al. 2007). For the comparison we use data from Blake et al. (1987), Helmich & van Dishoeck (1997), Pirogov et al. (2003) and Zinchenko et al. (2000, 2009). HMPOs and IRDCs have different physical conditions (e.g. temperatures) and therefore expected to show different chemistry.

From our comparison we can see that high-mass protostellar objects show higher mean HC3N and HCN abundances, because some HMPOs have extremely high abundances of these species. The mean abundance of C2H in HMPOs, on the contrary, is a factor of 20 lower. We did not detect CH3CN emission in any single IRDCs spectra. However, using the “average spectra” technique we reduce the noise level and find very weak CH3CN emission and estimate its upper abundance limit. This upper limit is lower compared with the HMPO abundances from single-dish studies by Helmich & van Dishoeck (1997) and Blake et al. (1987) (see Fig. 7 right panel). Previous theoretical (Nomura & Millar 2004) and observational (Beuther & Sridharan 2007) studies of high-mass star-forming regions showed that a low amount of CH3CN is typical for the earliest evolutionary stages.

The average abundances of HC3N, HCO+, HCN, and C2H for IRDCs and HMPOs differ by a factor of 16−75. These differences are significant even when considering all the included assumptions and uncertainties.

4.3. HCN/HNC abundance ratio

Another criterion that we use to determine the chemical status of IRDCs is the HCN/HNC abundance ratio. For the low-mass pre-stellar cores from Tafalla et al. (2006), Jørgensen et al. (2004) and Ohishi et al. (1992) this ratio is  ≤ 1. Values of the HCN/HNC abundance ratio for HMPOs are higher and reach values of up to 13 (see Helmich & van Dishoeck 1997; and Blake et al. 1987) and are around 80 in the extreme regions like Orion (Goldsmith et al. 1986; Schilke et al. 1992). We find the HCN/HNC abundance ratios for our IRDCs  ~1. This value agrees with the theoretical predictions for the cold clouds (Sarrasin et al. 2010) and the values for the low-mass pre-stellar cores.

Considering the comparison between IRDCs, low-mass star-less cores, and HMPOs and assuming that the HCN/HNC abundance ratio strongly depends on temperature and is enhanced in active star-forming cores (Goldsmith et al. 1986; Schilke et al. 1992), our results support the idea that IRDCs present rather low mass star-less core chemistry than HMPOs chemistry. However, the number of low-mass pre-stellar cores and HMPOs, that we used for the analysis may be not sufficient in a strict statistical sense. Therefore, to make a more solid statement about the evolutionary status of IRDCs and to be more confident, we need to extend the line samples, add sulfur-bearing species, and perform further studies, including chemical modeling.

Besides the comparison with low- and high-mass cloud abundances, we also compared molecular abundances of “quiescent”, “middle” and “active” regions within our IRDC sample. In accordance with recent results by Battersby et al. (2010), we do not detect any significant difference among these three categories.

5. Conclusions

We presented 3 mm molecular line observations with the 22-m Mopra radio telescope. In total 13 molecular lines were observed for all IRDCs. The results of our study can be summarized as follows:

  • 1.

    Using H2 column densities from the previous investigation, we estimated molecular abundances of all species. We showed that there is a tendency for the IRDCs to have molecular abundances similar to the low-mass pre-stellar cores rather than to the HMPOs abundances. However, the derived abundances come with uncertainties of around one order of magnitude. Furthermore, the comparison abundances for low-mass cores and HMPOs also can be affected by considerable uncertainties, especially when abundances have been computed in the literature by combining heterogeneous data sets (regarding beam sizes etc.). To make more solid statements about the evolutionary status of IRDCs therefore calls for subsequent systematical studies.

  • 2.

    According to the classification of Chambers et al. (2009), we subdivided our clouds into “quiescent” and “active” and added a “middle” class. We found a trend for more evolved regions to have higher line widths and integrated intensities. However, we did not detect clear evidence of a different chemistry in these three groups.

  • 3.

    A comparison of the line width and integrated intensities of the IRDCs and low-mass dark clouds shows values for IRDCs that are several times higher. Broader and more intense lines mean that in IRDCs we have more turbulent conditions compared with low-mass clouds.

  • 4.

    We detect the SiO emission in some clouds and complicated shapes of the HCO+ emission line profile in all IRDCs, which indicates infall and outflow motions and the beginning of star-formation activity, at least in some parts of the IRDCs.

  • 5.

    The analysis of the two available CH3C2H excitation diagrams and detection of the very weak CH3CN (50−40) and CH3CN (51−41) lines on the “average spectra” indicate a warm gas component in some IRDCs. However, these warm regions are compact and cannot be resolved with single-dish observations.

Acknowledgments

The 22-m Mopra antenna is part of the Australia Telescope, which is funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for operations as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. The University of New South Wales Digital Filter Bank used for the observations with the Mopra Telescope was provided with support from the Australian Research Council. This research has made use of the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA’s Astrophysics Data System was used to assess the literature given in the references.

We thank the anonymous referee and Malcolm Walmsley for valuable comments and suggestions that helped to improve this work. We also wish to thank Eric Herbst, Arjan Bik and Sarah Ragan for useful discussions and Sergej Koposov for the assistance in software installation.

I.Z. was partially supported by RFBR.

References

  1. Afonso, J. M., Yun, J. L., & Clemens, D. P. 1998, AJ, 115, 1111 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Araya, E., Hofner, P., Kurtz, S., Bronfman, L., & DeDeo, S. 2005, ApJS, 157, 279 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Battersby, C., Bally, J., Jackson, J. M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 222 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamin, R. A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B. L., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 953 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benson, P. J., Caselli, P., & Myers, P. C. 1998, ApJ, 506, 743 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergin, E. A., Goldsmith, P. F., Snell, R. L., & Ungerechts, H. 1994, ApJ, 431, 674 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergin, E. A., Snell, R. L., & Goldsmith, P. F. 1996, ApJ, 460, 343 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beuther, H., & Henning, T. 2009, A&A, 503, 859 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beuther, H., & Sridharan, T. K. 2007, ApJ, 668, 348 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beuther, H., Churchwell, E. B., McKee, C. F., & Tan, J. C. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 165 [Google Scholar]
  11. Beuther, H., Semenov, D., Henning, T., & Linz, H. 2008, ApJ, 675, L33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Blake, G. A., Sutton, E. C., Masson, C. R., & Phillips, T. G. 1987, ApJ, 315, 621 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bronfman, L., Nyman, L., & May, J. 1996, A&AS, 115, 81 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carey, S. J., Clark, F. O., Egan, M. P., et al. 1998, ApJ, 508, 721 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Caselli, P., Benson, P. J., Myers, P. C., & Tafalla, M. 2002, ApJ, 572, 238 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chambers, E. T., Jackson, J. M., Rathborne, J. M., & Simon, R. 2009, ApJS, 181, 360 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Codella, C., Bachiller, R., Nisini, B., Saraceno, P., & Testi, L. 2001, A&A, 376, 271 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cyganowski, C. J., Whitney, B. A., Holden, E., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2391 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. De Buizer, J. M., & Vacca, W. D. 2010, AJ, 140, 196 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Egan, M. P., Shipman, R. F., Price, S. D., et al. 1998, ApJ, 494, L199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuller, G. A., Williams, S. J., & Sridharan, T. K. 2005, A&A, 442, 949 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibson, D., Plume, R., Bergin, E., Ragan, S., & Evans, N. 2009, ApJ, 705, 123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldsmith, P. F., Irvine, W. M., Hjalmarson, A., & Ellder, J. 1986, ApJ, 310, 383 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Helmich, F. P., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 1997, A&AS, 124, 205 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heyer, M. H., Carpenter, J. M., & Snell, R. L. 2001, ApJ, 551, 852 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hofner, P., Wiesemeyer, H., & Henning, T. 2001, ApJ, 549, 425 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackson, J. M., Finn, S. C., Rathborne, J. M., Chambers, E. T., & Simon, R. 2008, ApJ, 680, 349 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones, P. A., Burton, M. G., Cunningham, M. R., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jørgensen, J. K., Schöier, F. L., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A&A, 416, 603 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kalenskii, S. V., Promislov, V. G., Alakoz, A., Winnberg, A. V., & Johansson, L. E. B. 2000, A&A, 354, 1036 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krumholz, M. R., & McKee, C. F. 2008, Nature, 451, 1082 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ladd, N., Purcell, C., Wong, T., & Robertson, S. 2005, PASA, 22, 62 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, C. W., Myers, P. C., & Tafalla, M. 2001, ApJS, 136, 703 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, M., Stanimirović, S., Ott, J., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 1101 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lo, N., Cunningham, M., Bains, I., Burton, M. G., & Garay, G. 2007, MNRAS, 381, L30 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  36. Marcelino, N., Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., & Roueff, E. 2009, ApJ, 690, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marcelino, N., Brünken, S., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2010, A&A, 516, A105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mardones, D., Myers, P. C., Tafalla, M., et al. 1997, ApJ, 489, 719 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Müller, H. S. P., Thorwirth, S., Roth, D. A., & Winnewisser, G. 2001, A&A, 370, L49 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  40. Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, J. Molec. Struct., 742, 215 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Myers, P. C., Mardones, D., Tafalla, M., Williams, J. P., & Wilner, D. J. 1996, ApJ, 465, L133 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nomura, H., & Millar, T. J. 2004, A&A, 414, 409 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ohishi, M., Irvine, W. M., & Kaifu, N. 1992, in Astrochemistry of Cosmic Phenomena, ed. P. D. Singh, IAU Symp., 150, 171 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Padovani, M., Walmsley, C. M., Tafalla, M., Galli, D., & Müller, H. S. P. 2009, A&A, 505, 1199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. Perault, M., Omont, A., Simon, G., et al. 1996, A&A, 315, L165 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pillai, T., Wyrowski, F., Carey, S. J., & Menten, K. M. 2006, A&A, 450, 569 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pirogov, L., Zinchenko, I., Caselli, P., Johansson, L. E. B., & Myers, P. C. 2003, A&A, 405, 639 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. Purcell, C. R., Balasubramanyam, R., Burton, M. G., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 553 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ragan, S. E., Bergin, E. A., Plume, R., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 567 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ragan, S. E., Bergin, E. A., & Gutermuth, R. A. 2009, ApJ, 698, 324 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rathborne, J. M., Jackson, J. M., & Simon, R. 2006, ApJ, 641, 389 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rawlings, J. M. C., Taylor, S. D., & Williams, D. A. 2000, MNRAS, 313, 461 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rawlings, J. M. C., Redman, M. P., Keto, E., & Williams, D. A. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1054 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Redman, M. P., Khanzadyan, T., Loughnane, R. M., & Carolan, P. B. 2008, in Massive Star Formation: Observations Confront Theory, ed. H. Beuther, H. Linz, & T. Henning, ASP Conf. Ser., 387, 38 [Google Scholar]
  55. Saito, H., Mizuno, N., Moriguchi, Y., et al. 2001, PASJ, 53, 1037 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sakai, T., Sakai, N., Kamegai, K., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1049 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sakai, T., Sakai, N., Hirota, T., & Yamamoto, S. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1658 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sarrasin, E., Abdallah, D. B., Wernli, M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 518 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  59. Schilke, P., Walmsley, C. M., Pineau Des Forets, G., et al. 1992, A&A, 256, 595 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shirley, Y. L., Evans II, N. J., Young, K. E., Knez, C., & Jaffe, D. T. 2003, ApJS, 149, 375 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Simon, R., Jackson, J. M., Rathborne, J. M., & Chambers, E. T. 2006, ApJ, 639, 227 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sridharan, T. K., Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Menten, K. M., & Wyrowski, F. 2002, ApJ, 566, 931 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sridharan, T. K., Beuther, H., Saito, M., Wyrowski, F., & Schilke, P. 2005, ApJ, 634, L57 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tafalla, M., Myers, P. C., Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., & Comito, C. 2002, ApJ, 569, 815 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tafalla, M., Santiago-García, J., Myers, P. C., et al. 2006, A&A, 455, 577 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  66. Turner, B. E. 1971, ApJ, 163, L35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vasyunina, T., Linz, H., Henning, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, 149 (Paper I) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  68. Viti, S. 2005, in Astrochemistry: Recent Successes and Current Challenges, ed. D. C. Lis, G. A. Blake, & E. Herbst, IAU Symp., 231, 67 [Google Scholar]
  69. Walsh, A. J., & Burton, M. G. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 321 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang, Q., Sridharan, T. K., Hunter, T. R., et al. 2007, A&A, 470, 269 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zinchenko, I., Henkel, C., & Mao, R. Q. 2000, A&A, 361, 1079 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zinchenko, I., Caselli, P., & Pirogov, L. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 2234 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zinnecker, H., & Yorke, H. W. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 481 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Online material

Appendix A: 3-color Spitzer/Glimpse images

thumbnail Fig. A.1

Three-color Spitzer/GLIMPSE image of the infrared dark cloud, where 3.6 μm is blue, 4.5 μm is green and 8 μm is red. Circles mark observed positions and show the beam size.

thumbnail Fig. A.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. A.1

continued.

Appendix B: Spectra images

thumbnail Fig. B.1

Observed lines.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

thumbnail Fig. B.1

continued.

Appendix C: Line parameters

Table C.1

N2H+ line parameters.

Table C.2

13CS line parameters.

Table C.3

HC3N line parameters.

Table C.4

HNC line parameters.

Table C.5

HCO+ line parameters.

Table C.6

HNCO line parameters.

Table C.7

SiO line parameters.

Table C.8

H13CO+ line parameters.

Table C.9

Integrated areas, measured by summing the channels between suitable velocity limits under the line.

All Tables

Table 1

List of observed IRDCs.

Table 2

Observed molecular species.

Table 3

Abundances of the IRDCs. a(b) denotes a × 10b.

Table C.1

N2H+ line parameters.

Table C.2

13CS line parameters.

Table C.3

HC3N line parameters.

Table C.4

HNC line parameters.

Table C.5

HCO+ line parameters.

Table C.6

HNCO line parameters.

Table C.7

SiO line parameters.

Table C.8

H13CO+ line parameters.

Table C.9

Integrated areas, measured by summing the channels between suitable velocity limits under the line.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Average spectrum. Obtained by averaging all spectra for every species with equal weight after shifting all of them to the same reference velocity. Several weak detections are amplified by a factor of 10, and CH3CN is amplified by a factor of 20 for plotting.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Line spectra for different mid-IR categories of IRDCs. (left) “Quiescent” cloud, (middle) “middle” cloud, (right) “active” cloud.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Distribution of N2H+ line width for our IRDCs sample, more evolved regions from Pirogov et al. (2003) and low-mass pre-stellar cores from Lee et al. (2001).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Comparison between N2H+ line width and kinematic distance to the objects for our IRDCs sample.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Number distribution of δV = (VHCO + VH13CO + ) / ΔVH13CO +  for our sample (see Sect. 3.3). Dashed lines indicate the  ± 5σδV level.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Samples of the HCO+ and H13CO+ line profiles. The vertical lines indicate the Vlsr positions measured from H13CO+ line profiles.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

(Left) Comparison of the molecular abundances of the IRDCs with low-mass pre-stellar cores from Padovani et al. (2009), Tafalla et al. (2006), Jørgensen et al. (2004) and Ohishi et al. (1992). Black diamonds indicate our IRDC abundances, green diamonds indicate mean values for IRDCs. Black crosses indicate low-mass starless cores, red crosses indicate mean values for low-mass starless cores. (Right) Comparison of the molecular abundances of the IRDCs with HMPOs from Blake et al. (1987), Helmich & van Dishoeck (1997), Pirogov et al. (2003) and Zinchenko et al. (2000, 2009). Black diamonds indicate our IRDC abundances, green diamonds indicate mean values of the corresponding species for IRDCs. Black triangles indicate HMPOs, red triangles indicate mean values of the corresponding species for HMPOs. In both panels the upper limit abundance value for CH3CN for IRDCs was estimated from the average spectrum.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.1

Three-color Spitzer/GLIMPSE image of the infrared dark cloud, where 3.6 μm is blue, 4.5 μm is green and 8 μm is red. Circles mark observed positions and show the beam size.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. B.1

Observed lines.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.