Issue |
A&A
Volume 693, January 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A246 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
Section | Numerical methods and codes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451831 | |
Published online | 22 January 2025 |
Machine-learning approach for mapping stable orbits around planets
1
Grupo de Dinâmica Orbital e Planetologia, São Paulo State University, UNESP,
Guaratinguetá,
CEP 12516-410,
São Paulo,
Brazil
2
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen,
Auf der Morgenstelle, 10,
72076
Tübingen,
Germany
3
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université,
5 place Jules Janssen,
92190
Meudon,
France
★ Corresponding author; francisco.pinheiro@unesp.br
Received:
7
August
2024
Accepted:
3
December
2024
Context. Numerical N-body simulations are typically employed to map stability regions around exoplanets. This provides insights into the potential presence of satellites and ring systems.
Aims. We used machine-learning (ML) techniques to generate predictive maps of stable regions surrounding a hypothetical planet. This approach can also be applied to planet-satellite systems, planetary ring systems, and other similar systems.
Methods. From a set of 105 numerical simulations, each incorporating nine orbital features for the planet and test particle, we created a comprehensive dataset of three-body problem outcomes (star-planet-test particle). Simulations were classified as stable or unstable based on the stability criterion that a particle must remain stable over a time span of 104 orbital periods of the planet. Various ML algorithms were compared and fine-tuned through hyperparameter optimization to identify the most effective predictive model. All tree-based algorithms demonstrated a comparable accuracy performance.
Results. The optimal model employs the extreme gradient boosting algorithm and achieved an accuracy of 98.48%, with 94% recall and precision for stable particles and 99% for unstable particles.
Conclusions. ML algorithms significantly reduce the computational time in three-body simulations. They are approximately 105 times faster than traditional numerical simulations. Based on the saved training models, predictions of entire stability maps are made in less than a second, while an equivalent numerical simulation can take up to a few days. Our ML model results will be accessible through a forthcoming public web interface, which will facilitate a broader scientific application.
Key words: methods: numerical / planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.