Issue |
A&A
Volume 693, January 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A46 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450499 | |
Published online | 03 January 2025 |
The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys
VI. Inference based on analytically simulated observable diagrams
1
Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno 611 37, Czech Republic
2
Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
3
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, I-10125 Torino, Italy
4
Université Paris Cité, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, AIM, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
5
Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
6
Laboratoire Univers et Théories, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Université PSL, F-92190 Meudon, France
⋆ Corresponding author; matej.kosiba@gmail.com
Received:
24
April
2024
Accepted:
13
August
2024
Context. The number density of galaxy clusters across mass and redshift has been established as a powerful cosmological probe, yielding important information on the matter components of the Universe. Cosmological analyses with galaxy clusters traditionally employ scaling relations, which are empirical relationships between cluster masses and their observable properties. However, many challenges arise from this approach as the scaling relations are highly scattered, maybe ill-calibrated, depend on the cosmology, and contain many nuisance parameters with low physical significance.
Aims. For this paper, we used a simulation-based inference method utilizing artificial neural networks to optimally extract cosmological information from a shallow X-ray survey, solely using count rates, hardness ratios, and redshifts. This procedure enabled us to conduct likelihood-free inference of cosmological parameters Ωm and σ8.
Methods. To achieve this, we analytically generated several datasets of 70 000 cluster samples with totally random combinations of cosmological and scaling relation parameters. Each sample in our simulation is represented by its galaxy cluster distribution in a count rate (CR) and hardness ratio (HR) space in multiple redshift bins. We trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to retrieve the cosmological parameters from these distributions. We then used neural density estimation (NDE) neural networks to predict the posterior probability distribution of Ωm and σ8 given an input galaxy cluster sample.
Results. Using the survey area as a proxy for the number of clusters detected for fixed cosmological and astrophysical parameters, and hence of the Poissonian noise, we analyze various survey sizes. The 1σ errors of our density estimator on one of the target testing simulations are 1000 deg2, 15.2% for Ωm and 10.0% for σ8; and 10 000 deg2, 9.6% for Ωm and 5.6% for σ8. We also compare our results with a traditional Fisher analysis and explore the effect of an additional constraint on the redshift distribution of the simulated samples.
Conclusions. We demonstrate, as a proof of concept, that it is possible to calculate cosmological predictions of Ωm and σ8 from a galaxy cluster population without explicitly computing cluster masses and even the scaling relation coefficients, thus avoiding potential biases resulting from such a procedure.
Key words: galaxies: clusters: general / cosmological parameters / cosmology: observations
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.