Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 667, November 2022
Article Number A143
Number of page(s) 16
Section Planets and planetary systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243209
Published online 23 November 2022
  1. Alho, M., Wedlund, C. S., Nilsson, H., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balsiger, H., Altwegg, K., Bühler, F., et al. 1986, Nature, 321, 330 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barucq, H., & Hanouzet, B. 1997, Asymp. Anal., 15, 25, 1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beth, A., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beth, A., Galand, M., & Heritier, K. L. 2019, A&A, 630, A47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biermann, L., Lüst, R., Lüst, R., & Schmidt, H. U. 1961, Z. Astrophys., 53, 226 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  7. Birdsall, C. K., & Langdon, A. B. 2004, Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation (Boca Raton: CRC press) [Google Scholar]
  8. Block, L. P. 1978, Astrophys. Space Sci., 55, 59 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonde, J., Vincena, S., & Gekelman, W. 2015, Phys. Rev. E, 92, 051102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonde, J., Vincena, S., & Gekelman, W. 2018, Phys. Plasmas, 25, 042110 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boris, J. P., & Shanny, R., 1970, Relativistic plasma simulation - Optimization of a hybrid code, eds. J.P. Boris & R. Shanny, 3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brackbill, J., & Forslund, D. 1982, J. Comput. Phys., 46, 271 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Callen, J. D. 2006, Course materials (University of Wisconsin-Madison) https://www.e-booksdirectory.com/details.php?ebook=3535 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chandrasekhar, S., Kaufman, A. N., & Watson, K. M. 1958, Proc. Ro. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci., 245, 435 [Google Scholar]
  15. Churyumov, K. I., & Gerasimenko, S. I. 1972, IAU Symp., 45, 27 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., & Lewy, H. 1928, Math. Annal., 100, 32 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cravens, T. 1987, Adv. Space Res., 7, 147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cravens, T.E. 1986, ESA SP, 250, 241 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  19. Deca, J., Divin, A., Henri, P., et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 205101 [Google Scholar]
  20. Deca, J., Henri, P., Divin, A., et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 055101 [Google Scholar]
  21. Derouillat, J., Beck, A., Pérez, F., et al. 2018, Comput. Phys. Commun., 222, 351 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Divin, A., Deca, J., Eriksson, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, L33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dupree, T. H. 1963, Phys. Fluids, 6, 1714 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Edberg, N. J. T., Eriksson, A. I., Odelstad, E., et al. 2015, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4263 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ershkovich, A. I., McKenzie, J. F., & Axford, W. I. 1989, ApJ, 344, 932 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Galand, M., Feldman, P. D., Bockelée-Morvan, D., et al. 2020, Nat. Astron., 4, 1084 [Google Scholar]
  27. Geissbuehler, M., & Lasser, T. 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 9862 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Glassmeier, K.-H., Boehnhardt, H., Koschny, D., Kührt, E., & Richter, I. 2007a, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Glassmeier, K.-H., Richter, I., Diedrich, A., et al. 2007b, Space Sci. Rev., 128, 649 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Goetz, C., Koenders, C., Hansen, K. C., et al. 2016a, MNRAS, 462, S459 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Goetz, C., Koenders, C., Richter, I., et al. 2016b, A&A, 588, A24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Goetz, C., Gunell, H., Volwerk, M., et al. 2021, Exp. Astron., in press [Google Scholar]
  33. Gombosi, T. I. 2015, Physics of Cometary Magnetospheres (USA: American Geophysical Union (AGU)), 169 [Google Scholar]
  34. Götz, C. J. 2019, PhD thesis, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany [Google Scholar]
  35. Grad, H. 1961, Phys. Fluids, 4, 1366 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gunell, H., Goetz, C., Eriksson, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S84 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Haerendel, G., Paschmann, G., Baumjohann, W., & Carlson, C. W. 1986, Nature, 320, 720 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hajra, R., Henri, P., Vallières, X., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 4140 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Henri, P., Vallières, X., Hajra, R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S372 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Higuera, A. V., & Cary, J. R. 2017, Phys. Plasmas, 24, 052104 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hockney, R. W., & Eastwood, J. W. 1988, Computer Simulation Using Particles (UsA: Taylor & Francis, Inc.) [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang, Z., Tóth, G., Gombosi, T. I., et al. 2016, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 121, 4247 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Huang, Z., Tóth, G., Gombosi, T. I., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 2835 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ip, W.-H., & Axford, W. I. 1987, Nature, 325, 418 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Israelevich, P. L., Ershkovich, A. I., Gombosi, T. I., Neubauer, F. M., & Cohen, O. 2003, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 108, 1097 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Klimontovich, I. L. 1958, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 6, 753 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  47. Koenders, C. 2015, PhD thesis, Braunschweig, Germany [Google Scholar]
  48. Koenders, C., Glassmeier, K.-H., Richter, I., Ranocha, H., & Motschmann, U. 2015, Planet. Space Sci., 105, 101 [Google Scholar]
  49. Krall, N. A., & Trivelpiece, A. W. 1973, Principles of Plasma Physics (New York: McGraw-Hill) [Google Scholar]
  50. Lühr, H., Southwood, D. J., Klöcker, N., et al. 1986a, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 91, 1261 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lühr, H., Southwood, D. J., Klöcker, N., et al. 1986b, Nature, 320, 708 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ma, Y.-J., Altwegg, K., Breus, T., et al. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 139, 311 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mandt, K. E., Eriksson, A., Edberg, N. J. T., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S9 [Google Scholar]
  54. Markidis, S., Lapenta, G., & Rizwan-uddin, 2010, Math. Comput. Simul., 80, 1509 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mason, R. J. 1981, J. Comput. Phys., 41, 233 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Melzani, M., Walder, R., Folini, D., & Winiadoerffer, C. 2014, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser., 28, 1460194 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nemeth, Z., Burch, J., Goetz, C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, S415 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Neubauer, F. M. 1987, A&A, 187, 73 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  59. Neubauer, F. M., Glassmeier, K. H., Pohl, M., et al. 1986, Nature, 321, 352 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Puhl-Quinn, P., & Cravens, T.E. 1995, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 100, 21631 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Reinhard, R. 1986, Nature, 321, 313 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ripperda, B., Bacchini, F., Teunissen, J., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rosenbluth, M. 1956, Stability of the pinch, Tech. rep., Los Alamos Scientific Lab., N. Mex. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rubin, M., Hansen, K. C., Combi, M. R., et al. 2012, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 117, A06 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rubin, M., Combi, M. R., Daldorff, L. K. S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 86 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rudakov, L., & Sagdeev, R. 1958, AN SSSR, 153, 321 [Google Scholar]
  67. Simon Wedlund, C., Alho, M., Gronoff, G., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  68. Simon Wedlund, C., Behar, E., Nilsson, H., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A37 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  69. Simon Wedlund, C., Behar, E., Nilsson, H., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, C3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  70. Valenzuela, A., Haerendel, G., Föppl, H., et al. 1986, Nature, 320, 700 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Vay, J.-L. 2008, Phys. Plasmas, 15, 056701 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yee, K. 1966, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 14, 302 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.