FAUST - XXV. A potential new molecular outflow in [BHB2007] 11

Open Access

Table 2

Comparison between the outflow properties obtained from the t_dyn method (Table 1) and from the PFT method (Hsieh et al. 2023).

Property	Value from t_dyn method	Value from PFT method	Ratio between t_dyn and PFT methods
Mass, M	1.19 × 10⁻² M_⊙	7.0 × 10⁻² M_⊙	0.2
Mass loss rate, $\dot{M}$ $\[\dot{M}\]$	1.7 × 10⁻⁶ M_⊙ yr⁻¹	4.2 × 10⁻⁸ M_⊙ yr⁻¹	40
Momentum injection rate, $\dot{P}$ $\[\dot{P}\]$	3.7 × 10⁻⁶ M_⊙ km s⁻¹ yr⁻¹	4.4 × 10⁻⁸ M_⊙ km s⁻¹ yr⁻¹	84
Kinetic energy, E	6 × 10⁴¹ erg	1.2 × 10⁴¹ erg	5
Energy injection rate, $\dot{E}$ $\[\dot{E}\]$	9 × 10³⁷ erg yr⁻¹	5.1 × 10³⁵ erg yr⁻¹	180

Notes. Mass and energy were not computed with t_dyn or the PFT crossing time, but we compare them to illustrate that the PFT code yields similar results.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.