Open Access
Table 3.
Comparison of the super-orbital periods that can be inferred using different temporal windows.
| Name | Period [d] | Freq. [1/d] | Window [MJD] | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| porb [forb] ( * *) | 0.68549(1) | 1.45881(1) | Torres et al. (2019) | |
| p58283 − 58391 [f58283 − 58391] | 0.68885(5) | 1.4517(1) | 58283-58391 | This work |
| pN21 [fN21] | 0.688907(9) | 1.45157(2) | 58283-58391 ( * ) | Niijima et al. (2021) |
| pP18 [fP18] | 0.703(3) | 1.422(6) | 58275-58290 ( * ) | Patterson et al. (2018) |
| p58275 − 58290 [f58275 − 58290] | 0.701(1) | 1.426(2) | 58275-58290 | This work |
| pP19 [fP19] | 0.6903(3) | 1.4486(6) | 58275-58310 ( * ) | Patterson (2019) |
| p58275 − 58310 [f58275 − 58310] | 0.6920(5) | 1.4451(9) | 58275-58310 | This work |
Notes.( * )These dates are only estimated from plots and thus can be different from the effective dates used to compute the periods in the cited papers. ( * *)True orbital period reported for comparison.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.