Continuum reverberation mapping of accretion disks depending on the vertical structures in active galactic nuclei

Home

All issues

Volume 695 (March 2025)

A&A, 695 (2025) A143

Full HTML

Open Access

Table 2.

Comparison of fitted $\dot{M}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}$ with other research studies.

Objects	$\dot{M}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}$	${\dot{M}}_{DW 19}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}_{\mathrm{DW19}}$	${\dot{M}}_{Other}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}_{\mathrm{Other}}$	Ref.	Methods
Mrk 335	–	$18 . 6_{- 6.0}^{+ 9.6}$ $18.6^{+9.6}_{-6.0}$	0.7	Tripathi et al. (2020)	SED fitting
Fairall 9	2.0	$0 . 19_{- 0.07}^{+ 0.20}$ $0.19^{+0.20}_{-0.07}$	0.2	Pal et al. (2017)	–
Ark 120	0.06	$0 . 02_{- 0.01}^{+ 0.03}$ $0.02^{+0.03}_{-0.01}$	1.0	Porquet et al. (2018)	–
MCG +08-11-011	0.15	$0 . 15_{- 0.08}^{+ 0.16}$ $0.15^{+0.16}_{-0.08}$	0.54	Fausnaugh et al. (2018)	Bolometric correction
NGC 2617	0.03	$0 . 01_{- 0.007}^{+ 0.026}$ $0.01^{+0.026}_{-0.007}$	0.1	Fausnaugh et al. (2018)	Bolometric correction
Mrk 110	10	$6_{- 2.6}^{+ 4.8}$ $6^{+4.8}_{-2.6}$	4	Meyer-Hofmeister & Meyer (2011)	–
Mrk 817	1.5	$0 . 13_{- 0.05}^{+ 0.09}$ $0.13^{+0.09}_{-0.05}$	2.0	Kara et al. (2021)	fitting τ
NGC 4151	0.5	$0 . 0015_{- 0.0011}^{+ 0.0021}$ $0.0015^{+0.0021}_{-0.0011}$	0.6–6	Edelson et al. (2017)	–
NGC 4593	0.09	$0 . 079_{- 0.061}^{+ 0.237}$ $0.079^{+0.237}_{-0.061}$	0.081	McHardy et al. (2018)	SED fitting
NGC 5548	0.3	$0 . 017_{- 0.009}^{+ 0.018}$ $0.017^{+0.018}_{-0.009}$	1	Fausnaugh et al. (2016)	–
Mrk 509	0.5	$0 . 3_{- 0.08}^{+ 0.11}$ $0.3^{+0.11}_{-0.08}$	0.5	Edelson et al. (2019)	–
NGC 7469	1.1	$0 . 32_{- 0.21}^{+ 0.28}$ $0.32^{+0.28}_{-0.21}$	0.5	Pahari et al. (2020)	Bolometric correction

Notes. $\dot{M}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}$ is the accretion rates fitted by the present model, ${\dot{M}}_{DW 19}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}_{\mathrm{DW19}}$ is the $\dot{M}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}$ measured by Du & Wang (2019) and ${\dot{M}}_{Other}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}_{\mathrm{Other}}$ is the $\dot{M}$ ${\dot{\mathscr{M}}}$ measured by other method, some of the methods are listed in the last column of the table, while ‘–’ represents the methods that are unclear to us. The references are list in the column Ref.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.