Press Release
Open Access

Table D.1.

2017 and 2018 AIS results for the fiducial models

MAD thermal Rlow Rhigh a* = −0.94 a* = −0.5 a* = 0 a* = 0.5 a* = 0.94

AIS17 AIS18 AIS17 AIS18 AIS17 AIS18 AIS17 AIS18 AIS17 AIS18
KHARMA 1 1 f/f f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p f/f p/p
H-AMR 1 1 p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 10 1 p/p p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p f/f f/f
KHARMA 1 10 p/p f/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 10 f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 10 10 f/p p/p p/p p/p f/f p/p f/f f/p p/p f/f
H-AMR 1 20 f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 1 40 p/p p/p p/p f/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 40 f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 1 40 p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 10 40 f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 10 40 f/f p/p p/p p/p f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f
BHAC 1 80 p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 80 f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p f/f
BHAC 10 80 f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 1 160 p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 1 160 f/f p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p f/f p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 160 f/f f/f p/p p/p f/p p/p p/p p/p p/p f/f
KHARMA 10 160 f/f p/p p/p p/p f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f
BHAC 10 160 f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p

MAD nonthermal Rlow,  ϵ Rhigh a* = −0.94 a* = −0.5 a* = 0 a* = 0.5 a* = 0.94

BHAC 1, 0 40 p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 1, 0 80 p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 1, 0 160 p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 1, 0.5 40 p/p p/p f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 1, 0.5 80 p/p p/p f/f f/f f/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
BHAC 1, 0.5 160 f/p p/p f/f f/f f/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p

SANE thermal Rlow Rhigh a* = −0.94 a* = −0.5 a* = 0 a* = 0.5 a* = 0.94

KHARMA 1 1 f/p f/f p/p f/f f/p f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 1 p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p f/f p/p p/p
KHARMA 10 1 p/p f/f f/f f/f p/p f/f f/p p/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 1 10 p/p f/f p/p f/f f/p f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 10 p/p f/f f/f f/f p/p f/f p/p p/p
KHARMA 10 10 f/f f/p f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 20 f/p f/f f/f p/p p/p f/f p/p f/p
H-AMR 1 40 f/f f/f f/f p/p p/p f/f p/p f/p
KHARMA 1 40 p/p p/p p/p f/f p/p f/f p/p f/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 10 40 f/f f/p p/p p/p p/p f/f f/p f/f p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 80 p/p p/p f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p
H-AMR 1 160 f/p p/p f/f p/p f/f f/f p/p p/p
KHARMA 1 160 f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p
KHARMA 10 160 f/f f/f p/p p/p p/p p/p p/p f/f p/p p/p

Note. The results shown are based on two choices of probability cutoffs, 𝒫 = (15%/10%). Models with AIS result higher than the cutoffs pass and are marked as ’p’. The failed models are indicated by ’f’.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.