Open Access

Table 1.

Best-fitting parameters in different models.

Cut-off PL HIGHECUT


gabs (1) cyclabs (2) gabs cyclabs
Ecyc (keV) 102 . 7 3.6 + 4.7 $ 102.7_{-3.6}^{+4.7} $ 99 . 5 3.3 + 4.2 $ 99.5_{-3.3}^{+4.2} $ 102 . 5 3.7 + 4.5 $ 102.5_{-3.7}^{+4.5} $ 99 . 7 2.0 + 2.8 $ 99.7_{-2.0}^{+2.8} $
σcyc (keV)/Wf (keV) 11 . 7 2.8 + 3.7 $ 11.7_{-2.8}^{+3.7} $ 12 . 6 4.7 + 4.6 $ 12.6_{-4.7}^{+4.6} $ 12 . 0 2.4 + 3.3 $ 12.0_{-2.4}^{+3.3} $ 11 . 6 3.5 + 3.0 $ 11.6_{-3.5}^{+3.0} $
dcyc (keV)/Df 14 . 2 3.6 + 3.5 $ 14.2_{-3.6}^{+3.5} $ 0 . 6 0.1 + 0.2 $ 0.6_{-0.1}^{+0.2} $ 14 . 7 3.3 + 4.3 $ 14.7_{-3.3}^{+4.3} $ 0 . 6 0.1 + 0.2 $ 0.6_{-0.1}^{+0.2} $
NH 1 . 6 0.2 + 0.2 $ 1.6_{-0.2}^{+0.2} $ 1 . 7 0.3 + 0.3 $ 1.7_{-0.3}^{+0.3} $ 2 . 4 0.3 + 0.3 $ 2.4_{-0.3}^{+0.3} $ 2 . 5 0.3 + 0.3 $ 2.5_{-0.3}^{+0.3} $
Γ 0 . 21 0.01 + 0.01 $ 0.21_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 0 . 22 0.01 + 0.01 $ 0.22_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 0 . 21 0.01 + 0.01 $ 0.21_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 0 . 22 0.01 + 0.01 $ 0.22_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $
Norm 0 . 033 0.001 + 0.001 $ 0.033_{-0.001}^{+0.001} $ 0 . 034 0.001 + 0.001 $ 0.034_{-0.001}^{+0.001} $ 0 . 027 0.001 + 0.001 $ 0.027_{-0.001}^{+0.001} $ 0 . 027 0.001 + 0.001 $ 0.027_{-0.001}^{+0.001} $
Ecut (keV) 16 . 8 0.2 + 0.2 $ 16.8_{-0.2}^{+0.2} $ 17 . 1 0.2 + 0.1 $ 17.1_{-0.2}^{+0.1} $ 16 . 9 0.1 + 0.2 $ 16.9_{-0.1}^{+0.2} $ 17 . 1 0.2 + 0.1 $ 17.1_{-0.2}^{+0.1} $
Ef (keV) ... ... 4 . 1 0.3 + 0.2 $ 4.1_{-0.3}^{+0.2} $ 4 . 1 0.2 + 0.2 $ 4.1_{-0.2}^{+0.2} $
EFe (keV) 6 . 48 0.03 + 0.03 $ 6.48_{-0.03}^{+0.03} $ 6 . 47 0.02 + 0.03 $ 6.47_{-0.02}^{+0.03} $ 6 . 47 0.03 + 0.03 $ 6.47_{-0.03}^{+0.03} $ 6 . 46 0.03 + 0.04 $ 6.46_{-0.03}^{+0.04} $
σFe (keV) 0 . 16 0.03 + 0.03 $ 0.16_{-0.03}^{+0.03} $ 0 . 15 0.02 + 0.03 $ 0.15_{-0.02}^{+0.03} $ 0 . 15 0.05 + 0.04 $ 0.15_{-0.05}^{+0.04} $ 0 . 13 0.05 + 0.05 $ 0.13_{-0.05}^{+0.05} $
IFe (keV) 0 . 0009 0.0001 + 0.0001 $ 0.0009_{-0.0001}^{+0.0001} $ 0 . 0009 0.0001 + 0.0001 $ 0.0009_{-0.0001}^{+0.0001} $ 0 . 0009 0.0002 + 0.0002 $ 0.0009_{-0.0002}^{+0.0002} $ 0 . 0009 0.0001 + 0.0001 $ 0.0009_{-0.0001}^{+0.0001} $
kTbb (keV) 0 . 57 0.02 + 0.02 $ 0.57_{-0.02}^{+0.02} $ 0 . 56 0.02 + 0.01 $ 0.56_{-0.02}^{+0.01} $ 0 . 53 0.01 + 0.01 $ 0.53_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 0 . 53 0.01 + 0.02 $ 0.53_{-0.01}^{+0.02} $
ConsME/LE 1 . 03 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.03_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 1 . 03 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.03_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 1 . 03 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.03_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 1 . 03 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.03_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $
ConsHE/LE 1 . 01 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.01_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 1 . 00 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.00_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 1 . 00 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.00_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $ 1 . 01 0.01 + 0.01 $ 1.01_{-0.01}^{+0.01} $
Reduced χ2 (d.o.f.) 1.04 (1345) 1.04 (1345) 1.04 (1344) 1.04 (1344)

Flux2 − 140 7 . 89 0.02 + 0.02 $ 7.89_{-0.02}^{+0.02} $

Notes. The flux is given in units of 10−9 erg cm−2 s−1, and the column density NH is listed in units of 1022 atoms cm−2. For the normalization constants, we fixed the constant to one for the LE instrument and kept the ConsME/LE and ConsHE/LE free.

(1)

gabs(E) = exp ( d cyc 2 π σ cyc e 0.5 [ ( E E cyc ) / σ cyc ] 2 ) $ \exp \left(-\frac{d_{\mathrm{cyc}}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \sigma_{\mathrm{cyc}}} e^{-0.5 \left[\left(E-E_{\mathrm{cyc}}\right) / \sigma_{\mathrm{cyc}}\right]^2}\right) $.

(b)

cyclabs(E) = exp [ D f ( W f E / E cyc ) 2 ( E E cyc ) 2 + W f 2 ] $ \exp \left[-D_{\mathrm{f}} \frac{\left(W_{\mathrm{f}} E / E_{\mathrm{cyc}}\right)^{2}}{\left(E-E_{\mathrm{cyc}}\right)^{2} +W_{\mathrm{f}}^{2}}\right] $.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.