Open Access
Table 4
Final fate of dynamical BBH mergers (model DynA) in HM clusters.
IC | Ej3B | InCl | EjGR | Cl† | AfterDisr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | ×10−3% | ×10−3% | |
kro1 | 95.27 | 1.03 | 3.69 | 0.62 | 5.42 |
lar1 | 97.09 | 0.68 | 2.23 | 0 | 1.02 |
lar5che | 96.99 | 0.74 | 2.27 | 0 | 4.77 |
log1 | 98.68 | 0.42 | 0.90 | 0 | 0 |
log1che | 98.71 | 0.39 | 0.89 | 0 | 0 |
top1 | 99.67 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0 | 0 |
Notes. Same as Table 3, but for dynamical BBH mergers using the pairing criterion DynA. In this case, no BBH merger can have the EjSN flag because we assumed that the single BHs ejected by supernova kick no longer pairs up.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.