Table B.1
Stars previously misclassifled as Cepheid (candidates) observed as part of VELOCE and later found out to not be classical Cepheids (excerpt)
Name | NRV | Peak | Odd? | Ncomp | Emi? | vRV | vFWHM | vAsy | vCont | CCF note | Gaia DR3 source_id | GDR3 class | G22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR Lyrae stars | |||||||||||||
ASAS J165126-2434.9 | 10 | y | n | y | y | y | y | 6046836528519375232 | RR | RRAB | |||
GP Aqr | 2 | y | y | y | y | y | y | Noisy CCF | 2622261225664677120 | RR | EA | ||
RR Lyr | 146 | y | y | y | y | y | RRAB | 2125982599343482624 | RR | RRAB | |||
V1319 Sco | 19 | y | y | y | y | y | y | Low contrast variable CCF and noisy | 6246499215814759936 | RR | RRC | ||
Type-II Cepheids | |||||||||||||
AM Vel | 6 | y | n | y | y | y | y | 5521425379537360896 | T2CEP | DCEP | |||
AL Vir | 15 | y | n | y | y | y | y | 6303152720661307648 | CEP | CW | |||
... |
Notes. NRV lists the number of RV measurements reported here; this number is 0 if no observation produced a CCF peak. Peak specifies whether at least one observation produced a CCF peak. ‘odd?’ specifies whether the CCFs looked significantly different than those of classical Cepheids. Ncomp specifies if more than a single absorption component was noticed, ‘Emi’ whether any observation exhibited signs of emission features. ‘vRV’, ‘vFWHM’, ‘vAsy’ and ‘vCont’ specify whether the object is variable in RV, line width, line asymmetry, and line depth, respectively. Column ‘CCF note’ provides qualitative information. Gaia DR3 source IDs are provided for cross-matching. ‘GDR3 class’ lists the best classifiers from Gaia DR3 classifier_best_class_name, where ‘DSCT++’ abbreviates DSCT|GDOR|SXPHE, and “ACV++” abbreviates ACV|CPIMCP|ROAM|ROAP|SXARI. Column ‘G22’ lists the primary_var_type from Gavras et al. (2023). ‘y’ indicates ‘yes’, ‘n’ means ‘no’, ‘NA indicates ‘not applicable’ (typically because only one observation was available). ‘WVir?’ indicates a tentative signature of emission in the blue part of the CCF analogous to what is seen in W Vir, cf. Fig 1. Question marks indicate tentative assessments. The full table is available via the CDS.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.