Table 5
Literature zero-point offsets relative to VELOCE.
Reference | Nstars | Nclusters | ΔυZP | ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anderson et al. (2016a) (Hamilton) | 9 | 25 | −0.039 | 0.129 |
Baranowski et al. (2009) | 1 | 3 | −0.686 | 2.000 |
Barnes et al. (1987) | 9 | 16 | −0.916 | 0.652 |
Barnes et al. (1988) | 16 | 25 | −1.005 | 0.479 |
Barnes et al. (2005) | 5 | 9 | −0.076 | 0.277 |
Bersier et al. (1994) | 11 | 30 | −0.614 | 0.075 |
Bersier (2002) | 18 | 27 | −0.652 | 0.149 |
Borgniet et al. (2019) | 17 | 23 | −0.891 | 0.118 |
Caldwell et al. (2001) | 2 | 2 | −2.894 | 0.105 |
Coulson & Caldwell (1985) | 15 | 43 | 0.619 | 0.315 |
Coulson et al. (1985) | 3 | 7 | −0.868 | 0.695 |
Gieren (1981) | 3 | 3 | −3.202 | 0.513 |
Gieren (1985) | 1 | 1 | 1.560 | 2.000 |
Gieren et al. (1989) | 1 | 1 | −2.553 | 2.000 |
Gorynya et al. (1992, 1996, 1998) | 31 | 111 | −0.373 | 0.078 |
Imbert (1999) | 11 | 43 | −0.559 | 0.136 |
Joy (1937) | 2 | 3 | −2.318 | 1.790 |
Kienzle et al. (1999) | 6 | 12 | −0.647 | 0.075 |
Kiss (1998) | 4 | 4 | 0.353 | 0.383 |
Lloyd Evans (1980) | 2 | 2 | −0.850 | 0.739 |
Metzger et al. (1991) | 8 | 8 | 0.127 | 0.266 |
Metzger et al. (1992) | 6 | 6 | −0.826 | 0.748 |
Pont et al. (1994) | 12 | 12 | −0.650 | 0.326 |
Pont et al. (1997) (Coralie) | 6 | 8 | −0.525 | 0.290 |
Pont et al. (1997) (Elodie) | 4 | 4 | 0.095 | 0.164 |
Stibbs (1955) | 2 | 2 | −2.308 | 1.464 |
Storm et al. (2011) | 3 | 3 | 0.862 | 0.052 |
Storm et al. (2004) | 4 | 8 | −0.346 | 0.431 |
Struve (1945) | 1 | 1 | −2.009 | 2.000 |
Wilson et al. (1989) | 8 | 12 | −0.910 | 0.561 |
Gaia DR3 RVS Cepheid time series | 62 | 121 | 0.652 | 0.105 |
Coralie07 | 35 | 75 | 0.019 | 0.019 |
Coralie14 | 68 | 219 | −0.001 | 0.012 |
Hermes | 62 | 207 | −0.002 | 0.021 |
Notes. Zero-points are stated as ΔυZP = υγ,ref − υγVELOCE. Nstars is the number of stars used to determine ΔυZP, Nclusters the number of epochs used for the reference, with some stars contributing multiple epochs. Most zero-point offsets are of order ±1 km s−1 or less, and we recover the zero-point change between Coralie07 and Coralie14 to within ~5 m s−1, cf. Table 2, despite this analysis being based on high-amplitude variable stars. The adopted uncertainty is the standard median error unless only a single star was used to determine the zero-point, in which case a generous uncertainty of kms−1 was adopted. The offset for Anderson et al. (2016a) applies only to the Hamilton spectrograph data set. Coralie observations by Pont et al. (1997) used an instrument version prior to Coralie07 and feature a significantly different zero-point than Coralie07 and Coralie14. For Gaia DR3 RVs, we state the result based on template fitting, see Sect. 5.4.1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.