Table 1.
Summary of the seismic and atmospheric properties for three rHB candidates of our sample (Sect. 2).
KIC | L [L⊙] | Teff [K] | [Fe/H] | [α/Fe] | ⟨Δν⟩ [μHz] | νmax [μHz] | q | ΔΠ1 [s] | M [M⊙] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5271626* | 42 ± 4 | 4769 ± 9 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.91 ± 0.05 | 25.1 ± 0.5 | 0.61 | 291.4 ± 1.7 | 0.66 ± 0.07 |
6032981+ | 44 ± 4 | 5300 ± 110 | −1.01 | 0.37 | 5.188 ± 0.017 | 35.4 ± 0.6 | 1.15 | 321 ± 3 | 0.68 ± 0.08 |
8694070 | 53 ± 5 | 5300 ± 30 | −1.44 | 0.25 | 5.135 ± 0.018 | 34.6 ± 0.6 | 0.7 | 332 ± 4 | 0.81 ± 0.09 |
Mock rHB | 44 | 5663 | −1.00 | 0.2 | 6.41 | 42.5 | 0.65 | 324 | 0.65 |
Mock RC | 59 | 4891 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 4.79 | 44.1 | 0.25 | 313 | 1.50 |
Notes. For each Kepler ID (KIC) we report: the effective temperature, Teff, the [Fe/H], and the [α/Fe] from APOGEE-DR17 or APOGEE-DR16 (one star marked with a plus sign); and the mean large frequency separation, ⟨Δν⟩, and frequency of maximum power, νmax, calculated by us using the code in Davies & Miglio (2016) or Yu et al. (2018) data (one star marked with an asterisk). The coupling factor, q, and asymptotic period spacing of the dipole modes, ΔΠ1, were calculated using the stretched-period method (see e.g., Vrard et al. 2016). The current stellar mass, M, was computed from Eq. (1). The last two rows show the properties of a simulated rHB and RC star (Sect. 3).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.