Open Access
Table 3.
Summary of the Fisher’s exact test results.
| Test | Samples | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) |
| Disc+Wind best fits | Sy1 vs. Sy2 | <0.05 |
| Disc+Wind best fits | Sy1/1.8/1.9 vs. Sy2 | <0.05 |
| Disc+Wind acceptable fits | Sy1 vs. Sy2 | 0.37 |
| Disc+Wind acceptable fits | Sy1/1.8/1.9 vs. Sy2 | 0.31 |
| Torus best fits | Sy1 vs. Sy2 | <0.05 |
| Torus best fits | Sy1/1.8/1.9 vs. Sy2 | <0.05 |
| Torus acceptable fits | Sy1 vs. Sy2 | 0.34 |
| Torus acceptable fits | Sy1/1.8/1.9 vs. Sy2 | 0.12 |
| Unfitted sources | Sy1 vs. Sy2 | 0.59 |
| Unfitted sources | Sy1/1.8/1.9 vs. Sy2 | 1.00 |
Notes. In bold we indicate distributions that can be considered statistically different (i.e. p-value < 0.05).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.