Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 649, May 2021
Article Number A60
Number of page(s) 8
Section Atomic, molecular, and nuclear data
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040142
Published online 11 May 2021

© L. Zou et al. 2021

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Of the little more than 200 molecules detected in the interstellar medium (ISM) (McGuire 2018), about 20 compounds with six atoms constitute the series of the smallest complex organic molecules (COMs) (Herbst & van Dishoeck 2009). This is the most abundant group among COMs, an observation consistent with the fact that the number of molecules detected decreases with the number of atoms.

To find new compounds in the ISM, the choice of new candidates is mainly based on the analogy with the molecules detected, the possible chemistry of each interstellar cloud, and the physical parameters such as the relative thermodynamic stability of the isomers. Many detected compounds have an isomer in the list (McGuire 2018).

Among the six-atom molecules, only one isomer with a CH3NO formula has been detected, the formamide, H2NCHO, which was found in Sgr B2 and Sgr A in 1971 (Rubin et al. 1971). The following isomers in relative thermodynamic stability are the tautomer C-hydroxymethanimine (methanimidic acid, HN=CHOH), which is 13.4 kcal mol−1 less stable than formamide, and formaldoxime (CH2NOH), which is 51.0 kcal mol−1 less stable than formamide (Lattelais et al. 2010). The observation of methanimine, a reduced form of formaldoxime in the molecular cloud Sgr B2 (Godfrey et al. 1973), and the recent detection of hydroxylamine, H2NOH, in the quiescent molecular cloud G+0.693−0.027 located in the Galactic Center (Rivilla et al. 2020) prompted us to study formaldoxime. Methanimine is possibly synthesized in the ISM by the reaction of formaldehyde with ammonia (Vinogradoff et al. 2011), while the reaction of formaldehyde with hydroxylamine could form formaldoxime. The very reactive methanimine has never been prepared on a gram-scale in the laboratory in this way, but such an approach has been used since the end of the 19th century to prepare formaldoxime (Dunstan & Bossi 1898). Formaldoxime could also be formed in the ISM in other ways such as the oxidation of methanimine (H2CNH) or the reaction of the latter with H2NOH. To our knowledge, attempts to form formaldoxime by simulating the chemistry on the grains or in the gas phase of the ISM have never been carried out. However, as an isomer of the detected formamide, on the basis of a possible formation in the ISM starting from detected compounds, and by analogy with the imines observed in this medium, formaldoxime appears to be a good candidate as a component of interstellar clouds.

Formaldoxime is a prolate-type asymmetric top rotor. The microwave spectrum of formaldoxime was first reported by Levine (1962) and by Pillai (1962) independently. The structure revealed by isotopologue substitution suggests that this molecule has a planar trans geometry, with a small dipole moment: 0.40 Debye for a-dipole and 0.18–0.20 Debye for b-dipole (Levine 1962, 1963). The more stable trans isomer was supported by an ab initio calculation, which shows that the cis isomer has a significantly larger dipole moment (> 3 Debye), and it lies about 5.6 kcal mol−1 above the trans isomer (Umar et al. 2005). From this energy perspective, the cis isomer has a Boltzmann population ratio of only 78 ppm under room temperature. Although in the ISM, the possibility of kinetic processes that can pump the cis isomer to a higher population cannot be ruled out, in this article, we only focus on the trans isomer, and therefore the term “trans” is not used hereafter. Kaushik & Takagi (1978) reanalyzed the spectra of Levine (1962) to show the strong centrifugal distortion effects of this molecule up to the quartic order. In the studies by Levine and Pillai, the frequency resolution was ~ 0.1 MHz. The microwave spectrum with a much higher frequency resolution (~2 kHz) was measured by Klesing & Sutter (1990) to fully resolve the splitting due to the 14N nuclear spin. Rotationally-resolved infrared spectra of formaldoxime were reported across the infrared band from 30 μm to 1.5 μm (Duxbury et al. 1988; Duxbury 1988; Bannai & Duxbury 1994; Wu & Tan 2020, 2021). Several submillimeter-wave laser transitions of formaldoxime, pumped by CO2 lasers, were also reported. The frequencies, however, were not well determined because only four significant figures were reported in the unit of micron (Duxbury & Petersen 1984).

Due to the limited frequency resolution in the infrared and the limited numbers of detectable transitions in the microwave, uncertainties still remain in the spectroscopic constants of formaldoxime, and therefore in its predicted transition frequencies in the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave range. To date, the most accurate centrifugal distortion analysis has been performed by Wu & Tan (2020, 2021) using a high resolution synchrotron infrared beamline. In their studies, the highest J and Ka values accessed are 45 and 15, respectively. The complete set of five quartic terms, as well as three sextic terms, were determined. Their frequency measurement has an uncertainty of ~6 MHz (0.0002 cm−1), and their fit has a root-mean-square (r.m.s.) of ~15 MHz (0.0005 cm−1). Nevertheless, this accuracy is still insufficient for the astronomical search of the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave lines of formaldoxime in the ISM. In this article, we report the experimental measurement of the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave direct absorption spectrum of formaldoxime between 150–330 GHz and 400–660 GHz. The high resolution data allow us to fully characterize the centrifugal distortion effects of formaldoxime up to the decic order, which is sufficiently accurate for astronomical searches.

2 Experimental methods

2.1 Synthesis of formaldoxime

The synthesis of Dunstan and Bossi has been modified (Dunstan & Bossi 1898). A 33% aqueous solution of formaldehyde was prepared by stirring two masses of water with one mass of paraformaldehyde for 1 h at 80 °C. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature and one equivalent of hydroxylamine, hydrochloride and 0.5 equivalent of sodium carbonate were added. After stirring overnight, the evaporation of the water and low boiling compounds by heating to 60 °C under vacuum gives a solid containing a mixture of the trimer with sodium chloride. By heating this solid under vacuum to 100 °C, a substantially pure gaseous flow of formaldoxime was obtained. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR results of the sample are the following: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 6.48 (d, 2JHH = 8.5 Hz); 7.05 (d, 2JHH = 8.5 Hz); 8.2–9.6 (brd, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 138.8 (dd, 1JCH = 180.4 Hz and 167.2 Hz).

2.2 Millimeter- and submillimeter-wave spectrum of formaldoxime

The millimeter- and submillimeter-wave spectrum of CH2NOH was measured using the fast absorption spectrometer in Lille (Zakharenko et al. 2015; Motiyenko et al. 2019). In brief, the CH2NOH vapor was introduced into a 2-m absorption cell by heating the solid trimer mixture. After filling the cell with CH2NOH gas to a decent pressure, the cell was left static for measurement. The millimeter- and submillimeter-wave radiation was generated by a series of frequency multipliers (Virginia Diodes, Inc.), which were pumped by 12–18 GHz radio frequency generated by a synthesizer (Agilent, E8257), and detected by a hot electron bolometer (QMC). We used the sine-wave frequency modulation and second harmonic detection technique to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The modulation frequency was set at 20.5 kHz and the deviation was set at 15 kHz. The time constant of the lock-in amplifier (Metek 7270 DSP) was 200 μs and the integration time was 1 ms. The spectra between 150 GHz and 660 GHz were covered by four frequency bands. The frequency multiplication, frequency range, scanning step, and sample pressure are summarized in Table 1. The signal-to-noise ratio was sufficiently high to allow two averages for the whole frequency range. For a few extremely weak features, 8–16 averages were measured in a small frequency window around the lines.

The line frequencies were obtained by fitting the second derivative of the Voigt profile. The estimated uncertainty on transition frequencies ranges from 30 kHz to 100 kHz, depending on the signal-to-noise ratio of the line, the selection rule, and the splitting of the hyperfine structure. In brief, fully resolved lines were assigned with a smaller frequency uncertainty than blended lines, and a-type transitions were assigned with a smaller frequency uncertainty than b-type transitions, because b-type transitions are not only weaker due to the smaller b dipole moment, but they also have larger hyperfine splitting, which becomes only partially resolvable in the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave range. The complete list of observed lines, as well as their estimated uncertainty, can be found in CDS: S1–S2.

The spectral lines of CH2NOH were fit using the SPFIT program in the CALPGM suite (Pickett 1991). Partially blended lines were weighted by their relative intensities.

The ab initio 14N quadrupole hyperfine splitting constants and the dipole moment of CH2NOH were calculated using the Gaussian09 software (Frisch et al. 2016). Geometry was optimized using the B3LYP level of theory and 6-311++g(3df,2pd) basis set. The optimized geometry was used in single point energy calculation, using the B3PW91 level of theory and 6-311+G(df,pd) basis set.

Table 1

Multiplier specification and experimental conditions.

3 Results and discussion

Before the spectral assignment, the standing waves were removed from the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave spectrum of CH2NOH, and peaks were identified and fit to obtain the line frequencies. In the spectrum, we observed contamination lines from acetonitrile (CH3CN), which possibly originated from the residual on our vapor inlet. The contamination lines consist of those from the ground state of CH3CN, v8 = 1 and v8 = 2 vibrational excited states, and from 13CH3CN, CH3 13CN, and CH3C15N isotopologues. The line lists from the CDMS catalog (Müller et al. 2005) were used to clearly flag out these lines. Although these lines are strong (even stronger than the lines of CH2NOH), they are sparsely located in the spectrum and therefore do not pose serious difficulties in analyzing the transitions from CH2NOH.

To guide the assignment of the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave spectrum of CH2NOH, 124 previously reported microwave transitions (Levine 1962; Klesing & Sutter 1990) were used to prepare a prediction for the ground state. Frequency uncertainties were assigned to lines in the literature based on their experimental methods (0.1 MHz for Levine 1962 and 2 kHz for Klesing & Sutter 1990). In this prediction, due to the limited number of J and Ka levels accessed, only the rotational constants A, B, and C and the quartic centrifugal distortion constants can be determined. Nevertheless, this prediction is sufficiently accurate to guide the assignment of our millimeter- and submillimeter-wave spectrum. The a-type, R branch lines of CH2NOH are easily identified at a spacing of B + C ≈ 12 GHz. In addition, b-type, Q branches can also be found. As expected, frequency shifts from the microwave prediction were observed up to ~ 50 MHz, especially for high J and Ka lines.

The v12 = 1 state is the vibrational excited state of the lowest energy (373 cm−1, Wu & Tan 2020). For this state, the microwave line list in the literature, with only four rotational transitions and nine observed hyperfine components in total (Levine 1962), is insufficient to produce a reliable prediction. Nevertheless, it is not difficult to find the vibrational satellites of approximately 16% of the intensity of the ground state lines. Once the vibrational satellites for the strongest Ka = 0, 1, 2 lines for a series of J levels were identified, it was then possible to generate a preliminary fit with approximate rotational constants for the v12 = 1 state, using identical centrifugal distortion constants obtained for the ground state. We used the preliminary fit to generate the prediction that was sufficiently accurate to guide the assignment of the rest of the v12 = 1 state lines.

In the final assignment, 1433 millimeter- and submillimeter-wave lines were assigned to 2108 unique transitions (hyperfine transitions included) for the ground state, and 921 millimeter- and submillimeter-wave lines were assigned to 1298 unique transitions (hyperfine transitions included) for the v12 = 1 state. The highest J, Ka, and Kc accessed are 50, 24, and 44, respectively, for the ground state, and 45, 18, and 40, respectively, for the v12 = 1 state. The microwave lines were also included for the analysis. The full list of the measured transitions is summarized in Tables 2 and 3. An 8 GHz wide example of the CH2NOH spectrum is plotted in Fig. 1. In this example, we can clearly identify the a-type, R branch for the ground state and the vibrationally excited state, with the upper state J″ = 23, and Ka=3$K_{\textrm{a}}''\,{=}\,3$–16. In addition to the R branches, the b-type, Q branch of the ground state is also present, with the upper state Ka=5$K_{\textrm{a}}''\,{=}\,5$, and J″ = 5–31. We used the ab initio dipole moment, 0.26 D for a-dipole and 0.19 D for b-dipole, to generate the overall prediction, because we found that the relative intensities between the a-type and b-type lines are better reproduced using the ab initio values, compared with the experimental dipole moment reported by Levine (1962). Figure 1 demonstrates an excellent agreement between the prediction and the experimental spectrum.

The analysis of the ground state and v12 = 1 state was conducted separately because no obvious interaction between the two states was observed. A large portion of our measured transitions shows at least partially resolved hyperfine splitting due to the 14 N atom. To fitall transitions together, we used a “dummy” vibrational state quantum number in the SPFIT program to label the hyperfine lines. The spectroscopic parameters in the rotational Hamiltonian were shared across the states, while the hyperfine splitting parameters were associated only to the hyperfine state. Except for a few J″ ≤3 lines, we could only assign the three strong ΔF = ΔJ hyperfine components to partially resolved hyperfine splitting lines because the intensity of other ΔF≠ΔJ components scales with 1∕(2J2) and is below the detection limit. Therefore, the off-diagonal element χab in the quadrupole hyperfine tensor cannot be determined during the fit. We fixed it to the ab initio calculation value.

For the rotational Hamiltonian, the Watson’s S-reduction is presumably preferred for CH2NOH, because it is a nearly symmetric prolate-top rotor (Ray’s asymmetry parameter κ = −0.938), which was discussed in the work of dimethylsulfoxide (Margulès et al. 2010). The s111 parameter for CH2NOH is 3.4 × 10−7 for A-reduction, and −6.0 × 10−8 for S-reduction. Nevertheless, for comparison, we used both the Watson’s A-reduction and S-reduction Hamiltonian for the fit. In order to fully describe the Hamiltonian, centrifugal distortion constants higher than the fourth order are necessary. For both the A-reduction and S-reduction Hamiltonian, we first introduced all seven sextic centrifugal distortion constants into the fit of the ground state lines. All of these terms were statistically significant, and the r.m.s. of the fit result σ was reduced to 83.3 kHz, which is still larger than our experimental accuracy of the frequency measurements, being approximately 50 kHz. The weighted r.m.s. σw is 1.43, which implies that statistically significant effects are missing in the current model. Therefore, octic and decic constants were furthermore introduced to the fit, and only those with statistical significance were chosen to produce the final fit with σ = 32.4 kHz and weighted σw = 0.81 both satisfactory to our experimental uncertainty. The similar procedure was performed on the v12 = 1 lines, and the final fit produces a σ of 46.9 kHz and σw of 0.83, which again agree well with our experimental uncertainty. The full list of the spectroscopic constants of the ground state and the v12 = 1 state is shown in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

In general, the spectroscopic constants obtained by the Watson’s A-reduction and S-reduction Hamiltonian are of a similar accuracy. However, several sextic centrifugal distortion constants in the S-reduction are slightly better determined than those in the A-reduction. These constants include ΦJK, ΦKJ, and ϕJK in the A-reduction and HJK, HKJ, and h2 in the S-reduction. For the ground state fit, the relative uncertainty of these constants in the S-reduction is one order of magnitude lower than those in the A-reduction. For the v12 = 1 state fit, ϕJK cannot be statistically determined, whereas h2 can. The absolute values of δK, ϕJK, and ϕK in the A-reduction are 2–4 orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding d2, h2, and h3 terms in theS-reduction. This is due to the different constraints applied to the sextic terms of the angular momentum operators, and the constraint applied by the S-reduction is more suitable for the nearly symmetric top case where BC is small. As such, the S-reduction fit is preferred when generating the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave prediction of CH2NOH.

A combination fit of the microwave, millimeter- and submillimeter-wave, and infrared data for the ground state was tested using the S-reduction Hamiltonian. The weighted r.m.s. σw grew to 2.6, which is significantly higher than the fit with only microwave, millimeter- and submillimeter-wave data. All spectroscopic constants agree with the values in Table 4 within statistical uncertainty. Due to the relatively large experimental uncertainty, the weight on each infrared line is < 1∕3600 compared toeach millimeter- and submillimeter-wave line. Because the number of lines and the access of quantum numbers of the two data sets are similar, the infrared data have no significant impact on the fit results.

A large discrepancy was found for the ground state DK term in the S-reduction between our result and that from Wu & Tan (2020), but not for the v12 = 1 state. Among the four DK values in the S-reduction fit of this work and Wu & Tan (2020) for both states, and the four corresponding ΔK values in the A-reduction fit, the ground state DK term in Wu & Tan (2020) is the only outlier and two orders of magnitude smaller than all other seven values. It is also two orders of magnitude smaller than the value reported in Wu & Tan (2021), where more lines were used for the ground state fit. Since DK and ΔK correspond to the same angular momentum operator Jz4$J_z^4$, their values should be similar regardless of the reduction chosen. The ground state DK value reported by Wu & Tan (2020) is probably a typographical error.

Thanks to the higher frequency resolution and the access to higher J and Ka quantum numbers, our spectroscopic constants for both the ground state and v12 = 1 state are in general one to two orders of magnitude more accurate than the result from the synchrotron infrared measurement (Wu & Tan 2020). Using our spectroscopic constants shown in Tables 4 and 5, we can generate the line catalog prediction of CH2NOH up to J = 50 and 1 THz. In the line catalog, we removed the “dummy” quantum number that we used to label the hyperfine resolved lines, and we merged the predictions of the ground state and the v12 = 1 state. Because of the strong centrifugal distortion effects of CH2NOH, the estimated uncertainty of the predicted frequencies can exceed 1 MHz for quantum numbers that we were unable to measure. These predicted frequencies need to be treated with caution. The predictions are listed in Tables A.1 and A.2. Both tables can also be found in the supporting material CDS: S3–S4.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Sample spectrum of CH2NOH at 500 GHz. The experimental spectrum is plotted in black, and the model (with both the ground state and the v12 = 1 state) is plotted in blue sticks. Above the spectrum, the frequencies of three different branches are illustrated separately. Quantum numbers of the upper state are labeled for each branch where space is permitted.

Table 2

Measured frequencies and fit residual of formaldoxime in the ground state.

Table 3

Measured frequencies and fit residual of formaldoxime in the v12 = 1 state.

Table 4

Spectroscopic constants of CH2NOH, S-reduction.

Table 5

Spectroscopic constants of CH2NOH, A-reduction.

4 Implication to astronomy

The presence of CH2NOH in the N astrochemistry network has been long postulated. The NH2CHO/CH2NOH ratio is estimated to range from 11.4:1 to 4:1 in dark clouds (Allen & Robinson 1977). Although NH2CHO is commonly observed in multiple sources, no positive detection of CH2NOH has been claimed to date. In addition to the lower number density of CH2NOH, the dipole moment of CH2NOH (0.32 Debye) is significantly smaller than the dipole moment of NH2CHO (3.6 Debye) (Kurland & Wilson 1957). As a result, if we assume the NH2CHO/CH2NOH ratio to be 10:1, the line intensity of CH2NOH would be three orders of magnitude weaker than NH2CHO. Therefore, the search for CH2NOH, if it does exist in the ISM, requires sensitive observations toward ideal sources where nonthermal processes are able to drive a considerable amount of CH2NOH into the gas phase.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, we have measured the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave lines of CH2NOH in the range of 150–660 GHz using direct absorption spectroscopy, and we have obtained the most accurate fit to date for both the ground state and the v12 = 1 vibrationally excited state. Both Watson’s A-reduction and S-reduction Hamiltonian were used to fit the transitions, and we determined that the S-reduction is more suitable for CH2NOH. A prediction for the CH2NOH line list up to 1 THz is provided using our fit spectroscopic constants.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the “Programme National Physique et Chimie du Milieu Interstellaire” (PCMI) of CNRS/INSU with INC/INP co-funded by CEA and CNES, and by the French ANR Labex CaPPA through the PIA under Contract no. ANR-11-LABX-0005-01, the Regional Council of Hauts-de-France, the European Funds for Regional Economic Development (FEDER), and the contract CPER CLIMIBIO. L.Z. thanks the financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship grant (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019, Project no. 894508). J.C.G. thanks the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) for a grant.

Appendix A Predictions of CH2NOH lines

The prediction of CH2NOH lines using the Watson’s S-reduction Hamiltonian up to 1 THz is listed in Tables A.1 and A.2, which include the quadrupole hyperfine splitting components due to 14N. Tables are listed using the JPL/CDMS molecular catalog format (Pickett et al. 1998). For both predictions, the maximum J is 50, and the minimum intensity (log10 base) is −10.0.

Table A.1

Prediction of pure rotational formaldoxime transitions up to 1 THz for both the ground state and v12 = 1 state.

Table A.2

Prediction of pure rotational formaldoxime transitions including 14N hyperfine components up to 1 THz for both the ground state and v12 = 1 state.

Appendix B Ab initiocalculation

The x, y, z coordinates of CH2NOH after geometry optimization are listed in Table B.1.

Table B.1

Coordinates of CH2NOH after geometry optimization using B3LYP/6-311++g(3df,2pd). Unit is in Å.

References

  1. Allen, M., & Robinson, G. W. 1977, ApJ, 212, 396 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bannai, R. A., & Duxbury, G. 1994, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 11, 170 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dunstan, W. R., & Bossi, A. L. 1898, J. Chem. Soc. Trans., 73, 353 [Google Scholar]
  4. Duxbury, G. 1988, J. Mol. Spectr., 132, 393 [Google Scholar]
  5. Duxbury, G., & Petersen, J. 1984, Appl. Phys. B, 35, 127 [Google Scholar]
  6. Duxbury, G., Percival, R., Devoy, D., & Mahmoud, M. 1988, J. Mol. Spectr. 132, 380 [Google Scholar]
  7. Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., et al. 2016, Gaussian 09, Revision B.01 [Google Scholar]
  8. Godfrey, P. D., Brown, R. D., Robinson, B. J., & Sinclair, M. W. 1973, ApJ, 13, L119 [Google Scholar]
  9. Herbst, E. & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaushik, V. K., & Takagi, K. 1978, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 45, 1975 [Google Scholar]
  11. Klesing, A., & Sutter, D. H. 1990, Z. Naturforsch. A, 45, 817 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kurland, R. J., & Wilson, E. B. 1957, J. Chem. Phys., 27, 585 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lattelais, M., Pauzat, F., Ellinger, Y., & Ceccarelli, C. 2010, A&A, 519, A30 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levine, I. N. 1962, J. Mol. Spectr., 8, 276 [Google Scholar]
  15. Levine, I. N. 1963, J. Chem. Phys., 38, 2326 [Google Scholar]
  16. Margulès, L., Motiyenko, R., Alekseev, E., & Demaison, J. 2010, J. Mol. Spectr., 260, 23 [Google Scholar]
  17. McGuire, B. A. 2018, ApJS, 239, 17 [Google Scholar]
  18. Motiyenko, R. A., Armieieva, I. A., Margulès, L., Alekseev, E. A., & Guillemin, J.-C. 2019, A&A, 623, A162 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. Müller, H., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, J. Mol. Struct., 742, 215 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pickett, H. M. 1991, J. Mol. Spectr., 148, 371 [Google Scholar]
  21. Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, J. Quant. Spectr. Rad. Trans., 60, 883 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pillai, M. G. K. 1962, J. Phys. Chem., 66, 179 [Google Scholar]
  23. Rivilla, V. M., Martín-Pintado, J., Jiménez-Serra, I., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, L28 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rubin, R. H., Swenson, Jr. G. W., Benson, R. C., Tigelaar, H. L., & Flygare, W. H. 1971, ApJ, 169, L39 [Google Scholar]
  25. Umar, Y., Jimoh, T., & Morsy, M. 2005, J. Mol. Struct.: Theochem., 725, 157 [Google Scholar]
  26. Vinogradoff, V., Duvernay, F., Danger, G., Theulé, P., & Chiavassa, T. 2011, A&A, 530, A128 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu, Q., & Tan, T. 2021, J. Mol. Spectr., 376, 111417 [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu, Q. Y., & Tan, T. L. 2020, J. Mol. Spectr., 111290 [Google Scholar]
  29. Zakharenko, O., Motiyenko, R. A., Margulès, L., & Huet, T. R. 2015, J. Mol. Spectr., 317, 41 [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Multiplier specification and experimental conditions.

Table 2

Measured frequencies and fit residual of formaldoxime in the ground state.

Table 3

Measured frequencies and fit residual of formaldoxime in the v12 = 1 state.

Table 4

Spectroscopic constants of CH2NOH, S-reduction.

Table 5

Spectroscopic constants of CH2NOH, A-reduction.

Table A.1

Prediction of pure rotational formaldoxime transitions up to 1 THz for both the ground state and v12 = 1 state.

Table A.2

Prediction of pure rotational formaldoxime transitions including 14N hyperfine components up to 1 THz for both the ground state and v12 = 1 state.

Table B.1

Coordinates of CH2NOH after geometry optimization using B3LYP/6-311++g(3df,2pd). Unit is in Å.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Sample spectrum of CH2NOH at 500 GHz. The experimental spectrum is plotted in black, and the model (with both the ground state and the v12 = 1 state) is plotted in blue sticks. Above the spectrum, the frequencies of three different branches are illustrated separately. Quantum numbers of the upper state are labeled for each branch where space is permitted.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.