Table 1.
Assessment of numerical resistivity (numerical fit parameters of the data visualized in Fig. 1, see Eq. (14)) for a 1D standing sine wave (series A) as well as propagating 1D plasma waves (series B and C, i.e., fast and Alfvén).
| Series | Reconstruction | 𝔑 | r |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | MP5 | 34.96 | 4.88 |
| MP7 | 259.13 | 6.84 | |
| MP9 | 1992.03 | 8.79 | |
| B | MP5 | 34.96 | 4.88 |
| MP7 | 255.34 | 6.83 | |
| MP9 | 783.37 | 8.38 | |
| C | MP5 | 36.47 | 4.87 |
| MP7 | 269.91 | 6.83 | |
| (39.94) | (5.8) | ||
| MP9 | 1822.52 | 8.73 | |
| (4.29) | (5.17) | ||
Notes. In parentheses we show the results for the cases that differ significantly when using the standard fourth-order reconstruction for the parallel current.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.