Table 2
Modeled and measured relative permittivity in the DM and HM analog models.
Percentage of | Mixing model | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part | Estimate type | Analog | material | CRIM | MG | EXP | Nominal | Measured |
Filament | A priori | DM, HM | 100 | 4.50 + j0.02 | ||||
A posteriori | DM, HM | 100 | 4.19 + j0.06 | |||||
Interior | A priori | DM, HM | 90 | 4.04 + j0.02 | 3.83 + j0.02 | 4.01 + j0.02 | ||
A posteriori | DM, HM | 90 | 3.76 + j0.05 | 3.59 + j0.04 | 3.75 + j0.05 | 3.40 + j0.04 | ||
Mantle | A priori | DM | 66 | 3.03 + j0.01 | 2.65 + j0.01 | 2.96 + j0.01 | ||
A posteriori | DM | 66 | 2.86 + j0.03 | 2.55 + j0.02 | 2.80 + j0.03 | 2.56 + j0.02 | ||
Void | A priori | DM | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Notes. The a prioriestimates refer to the nominal permittivity value of the ABS450 filament which has been measured by the manufacturer at 2.4 GHz frequency. The a posteriori estimates have been obtained by performing bistatic far-field scattering measurements (Eyraud et al. 2015) with the 3D-printed spheres as targets and, in the case of the mixing models, referring to the permittivityof the 100% filled sphere. The best match between a priori and a posteriori values is obtained with the MG mixing model.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.