Table 3
Abundances, associated error estimates, and abundance corrections due to line blending.
| LTE | non-LTE | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wavelength (Å) | A(Ba)1D,LTE | Δblend | σBPO | σblends | σf-value | σtotal | A(Ba)1D | A(Ba)3D | A(Ba)1D | A(Ba)3D | |
| 4554.033 | 2.22 | − 0.01 | ±0.03 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 | ±0.03 | 2.21 | 2.32 | 2.16 | 2.29 | |
| 5853.673 | 2.27 | − 0.03 | ±0.01 | ±0.00 | ±0.01 | ±0.01 | 2.24 | 2.29 | 2.13 | 2.27 | |
| 6141.711 | 2.39 | − 0.16 | ±0.03 | ±0.02 | ±0.01 | ±0.04 | 2.23 | 2.33 | 2.08 | 2.27 | |
| 6496.896 | 2.29 | − 0.04 | ±0.02 | ±0.00 | ±0.01 | ±0.02 | 2.25 | 2.35 | 2.06 | 2.27 | |
Notes. Column 2 tabulates the 1D LTE abundances found when the lines were assumed to be clean. They are consistent with the profiles depicted in Fig. 5. Column 3 presents the abundance correction associated with line blending. The final four columns present actual abundances of each line when the appropriate corrections were added to Cols. 2 and 3 from Table 2. The weighted averages calculated in Sect. 5.4 are computed using these abundances and the systematic errors tabulated inCol. 7 from the errors in BPO theory (Barklem et al. 2000), line blend uncertainties, and oscillator strengths, f, which are presented in Cols. 4, 5, and 6, respectively.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.