Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 604, August 2017
Article Number A50
Number of page(s) 8
Section Stellar atmospheres
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730676
Published online 02 August 2017

© ESO, 2017

1. Introduction

Stellar chromospheres are classically defined as an atmospheric layer lying above the photosphere and below the corona, characterized by a positive temperature gradient and a marked departure from radiative equilibrium. Stellar chromospheres exhibit a wide range of phenomena collectively called “activity”, mainly due to the presence and time evolution of highly structured magnetic fields emerging from the convective envelope. Strong spectral lines are commonly used as diagnostics of chromospheric activity; lines such as Ca ii H and K lines, and the infrared triplet, the Hα line whose core is formed in the chromosphere, the Na i D lines, and many UV lines from atoms and ions such as O i, C i, and Fe ii, with formation temperature at ~104 K.

Historically, magnetic activity in stellar atmospheres has been confirmed from long-term observations of the spectroscopic and photometric behavior of Sun-like stars in the Ca ii H and K lines. In particular, most of the data have been collected in two projects, one at Mount Wilson Observatory (MWO; Wilson 1978; Duncan et al. 1991) and another at Lowell Observatory (Hall et al. 2007). The observed line emissions, resulting from the non-thermal heating that occurs in the presence of strong magnetic fields, are quantified through the S (Wilson 1978) and RHK\hbox{$R'_{\rm HK}$} (Noyes et al. 1984) indices.

In this work, we investigate the potential of four Mg i spectral lines, the 4571 Å line and the b triplet at 5183, 5172 and 5167 Å, as diagnostics of chromospheric activity in solar-like stars. These lines have been modeled and observed in the solar atmosphere by many authors (i.e., Athay & House 1962; Athay & Canfield 1969; Altrock & Cannon 1972; White et al. 1972; Altrock & Canfield 1974; Heasley & Allen 1980) and are known as spectroscopic probes of physical conditions in the solar upper photosphere and lower chromosphere. For these reasons they are well suited as a diagnostic of the low chromosphere, close to the temperature minimum region. Langangen et al. (2009) studied the Mg i 4571 Å theoretical line formation in the quiet Sun and in a series of sunspot models, concluding that the line can be used to probe the lower chromosphere, especially for cooler atmospheres, such as sunspots.

The Mg i 4571 Å line is a “forbidden”, intersystem line originating between the atomic levels 31S and 33P1 and, in the Sun, forms at about 500 km above τ5000 = 1 (we refer also to the discussion in Sect. 2.1 and in particular the lower panel of Fig. 2). Its source function is very close to local thermodynamical equilibrium (LTE) because the population ratio of its upper and lower levels is determined mainly by collisional processes. Despite its small oscillator strength (2.4 × 10-6) it is a prominent line in the solar spectrum because its opacity is determined by the population of the Mg i ground state. This also implies that non local thermodynamical equilibrium (NLTE) effects may be important in determining its optical depth. Hence the need of full, NLTE, multi-level calculations.

The Mg i b triplet originates between the atomic levels 33P0,1,2 and 43D, and comprises a component at 5183 Å with Jl = 2 (b1), one at 5172 Å with Jl = 1 (b2), and one at 5167 Å with Jl = 0 (b3). The relative simplicity of the formation of the Mg i 4571 line is in contrast with the complex formation of the Mg i b triplet. In the solar atmosphere, the cores of the b triplet lines form in the low chromosphere. Both their source function and opacities are affected by NLTE, mainly through photoionization. The coupling with other atmospheric regions introduced by this kind of NLTE effect makes these lines less sensitive to local conditions. The wings of these lines form in the photosphere (Zhao et al. 1998; Sasso 2004).

The behavior and the formation of these Mg lines have also been studied in stellar atmospheres and, in particular, the Mg i b triplet has often been indicated in the literature as a good diagnostic of stellar activity (Montes et al. 1999a,b; Basri et al. 1989). Recently, Osorio et al. (2015) and Osorio & Barklem (2016) studied the Mg line formation in late-type stellar atmospheres, using the same numerical code to solve the coupled equations of radiative transfer and statistical equilibrium that we are using in this work and describe in Sect. 2. They constructed a new Mg model atom for NLTE studies and implemented new quantum mechanical calculations to investigate the effect of different collisional processes in benchmark late-type stars. Their study aims to give abundance corrections especially in metal-poor stars, where departures from LTE affect line formations. A similar attempt has been made by Merle et al. (2011) for the Mg line formation in late-type giant and supergiant stars, and in particular for the lines we are studying, also in a metal-poor dwarf and a metal-poor giant (Merle et al. 2013a,b).

In this work, we extend the above investigation to solar-like stars (dwarf stars of spectral types F-K and solar metallicity) by studying the dependence of the intensity of these lines on local atmospheric changes by varying atmospheric models and stellar parameters. The aim is to evaluate the reliability of these four Mg spectral lines as diagnostics of chromospheric activity in this type of star.

The paper is structured as follows. In Sect. 2 we describe the Mg atomic model and the stellar atmospheric models used in this work. In Sect. 3, we compare the synthetic profiles obtained with eight observed spectra of Sun-like stars and discuss the sensitivity of the Mg lines to local changes in the atmospheric model. Finally, in the conclusions (Sect. 4), the role of these Mg lines as diagnostic of chromospheric activity is defined.

2. Model calculations and solar test

In order to investigate the sensitivity of the Mg i 4571 Å and the b triplet line profiles in main sequence, solar-like stars to local atmospheric changes at chromospheric levels, we built a grid of models of a stellar atmosphere with different effective temperatures, solar gravity, and solar metallicity, and the coupled equations of radiative transfer and statistical equilibrium were solved for the Mg i using version 2.2 of the code MULTI (Carlsson 1986).

2.1. Atomic model

In this work we used, with some modifications, the Mg i atomic model proposed by Carlsson et al. (1992), consisting of 66 levels (including the continuum), 315 lines and 65 bound-free (bf) transitions treated in detail. The atomic model was slightly modified by Carlsson (priv. comm.) with respect to the original one presented in the above publication. The modifications were made in order to analyze in detail the Mg b triplet that it is treated as a superposition of three lines, taking into account that they are close enough to affect each other. The photo-ionization cross-sections are given with many more wavelength points, which makes the line blanketing calculation more accurate. In the literature we found other Mg atomic models containing different numbers of atomic levels. Mauas et al. (1988) used a 12-level atomic model to study the influence that the uncertainties in the value of different atomic parameters may have on the calculated profiles, comparing them with the Sun spectrum. Zhao et al. (1998) and Zhao & Gehren (2000) presented an 84-level atomic model to investigate the formation of neutral Mg lines in the solar photosphere and in the photosphere of cool stars, respectively. Their model is nearly the same as that used by Carlsson et al. (1992). Mashonkina et al. (1996) and Shimanskaya et al. (2000) instead, used a 49-level Mg i atomic model to study the formation of Mg lines in the atmospheres of stars of various spectral types performing a detailed statistical-equilibrium analysis. Finally, there are two recent atomic models constructed by Merle et al. (2011) and Osorio et al. (2015), used to investigate the effect of NLTE Mg line formation in late-type stellar atmospheres, as described in Sect. 1. Results from these papers show that departures from LTE for the lines we are considering are significant for low-metallicity stars. We decided to use the model proposed by Carlsson et al. (1992) because its original use is closer to our study and treats specifically the Mg b triplet. Moreover, we want to compare the results of the line synthesis with observed spectra from solar-like stars (stars with solar metallicity). All the atomic parameters used are specified in the work of Carlsson et al. (1992).

In order to match the observed profiles and test the procedure on the Sun, we recalculated the Van der Waals damping parameter for the transitions involved in the formation of the lines of our interest. As pointed out by Mauas et al. (1988), the Van der Waals broadening dominates over the radiative and the Stark broadenings in determining the Voigt coefficient in the formation of the 5173 Å line (studied as representative of the whole triplet). We also recalculated the Van der Waals damping parameter for the 4571 Å line, for homogeneity. The value of the theoretical Van der Waals damping parameter, ΓVW, has been calculated with two different methods, following the theoretical models presented by Deridder & van Rensbergen (1976) and Anstee & O’Mara (1995). The values retrieved are respectively 2.55 and 4.43 (10-8 rad cm3/s) for the b triplet and 0.86 and 1.25 (10-8 rad cm3/s) for the 4571 Å line. The Van der Waals damping coefficient required in the atomic model is the factor fGVW in the following formula ΓVW=fGVWΓVWM,\begin{eqnarray} \Gamma_{\rm VW}=f_{\rm GVW}\;\Gamma_{\rm VWM}, \end{eqnarray}(1)where ΓVWM is the value of the broadening calculated by the program MULTI, as follows (Milahas 1978, Sect. 9.3) ΓVWM=8.08(1+0.41(NHeNH))VH0.6NHC60.4,\begin{eqnarray} \Gamma_{\rm VWM}=8.08\left(1+0.41\left(\frac{N_{\rm He}}{N_{\rm H}}\right)\right)V_{\rm H}^{0.6}\;N_{\rm H}\;C_6^{0.4}, \end{eqnarray}(2)where VH0.6=[8kTπ(1mH+1mMg)]0.3\begin{eqnarray} V_{\rm H}^{0.6}=\left[\frac{8kT}{\pi}\left(\frac{1}{m_{\rm H}}+\frac{1}{m_{\rm Mg}}\right)\right]^{0.3} \end{eqnarray}(3)and C6=1.01×10-32(13.6I)2[1(EcEu)21(EcEl)2]·\begin{eqnarray} C_6=1.01\times 10^{-32}(13.6\;I)^2\left[\frac{1}{(E_{\rm c}-E_{\rm u})^2}-\frac{1}{(E_{\rm c}-E_{\rm l})^2}\right]\cdot \end{eqnarray}(4)The quantities NHe and NH are, respectively, the helium and hydrogen atomic number density (NHe/NH = 0.1), k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature in K, mH and mMg are, respectively, the atomic weight of hydrogen and magnesium in g, I is the ionization state of the lower transition level, Ec, Eu and El are the continuum, upper- and lower-level energy.

We adopt the values of the Van der Waals damping (fGVW = ΓVW/ ΓVWM) that give the better agreement with the solar observed profiles: fGVW = 2.3 for the b triplet (the same value used by Carlsson et al. 1992) and fGVW = 1.1 for the 4571 Å line (in the original atomic model was 10.9).

thumbnail Fig. 1

Mg i 4571 Å (left panel) and 5173 Å (b2, middle and right panel) observed and synthetic line profiles for the Sun. The third panel magnifies the b2 core. The black solid lines are the observed profiles (Kitt Peak solar flux atlas, Kurucz et al. 1984) while the red dotted, green dashed, and blue dash-dotted lines are the synthetic profiles obtained by using three different atmospheric models, VALC, FALC, and ALC, respectively.

As pointed out in Langangen et al. (2009) and Carlsson et al. (1992), it is important to treat the line blanketing in order to get the ionization balance right. For this reason, some treatment of line-opacity needs to be included in the calculations. The opacity package that comes with the code takes into account free-free opacity, Rayleigh scattering, and bound-free transitions from hydrogen and metals. The absence of line blanketing in the standard opacity package leads to an overestimate of emerging intensities (especially in the UV) and therefore to an overestimate of photoionization rates, some of which can be important in NLTE calculations. We have estimated the effect of line blanketing by increasing the background standard opacity by a suitable factor, following the method described in Busà et al. (2001). This method is based on a semi-empirical approach: Any background opacity source missing from the calculations is estimated from the ratio of the calculated flux to the observed one (in this work, we take the Next-Gen fluxes, Allard & Hauschildt 1995, as our “observed” reference spectrum). This approach therefore provides a quick, albeit approximate, way to take into account line haze, either in LTE or NLTE, in the most relevant photoionization rates. In particular, there is no guarantee that the depth dependence of the photoionization rates is correctly computed throughout the atmosphere. But this method already provides some improvements on the modeling of the Mg i lines as we show below.

We tested our procedure and data set on the Sun using three different quiet-Sun atmospheric models. The three semi-empirical models of the solar atmosphere used are the ones proposed by Vernazza et al. (1981, VALC), Fontenla et al. (1993, FALC), and Avrett & Loeser (2008, ALC), encompassing both the photosphere and the chromosphere. Figure 1 shows the synthetic Mg i 4571 Å (left panel) and b2 (middle and right panel) line profiles obtained using the Mg i atomic model and the three atmospheric models (VALC red dotted, FALC green dashed, and ALC blue dash-dotted line), compared with the Kitt Peak solar flux atlas (black solid line, Kurucz et al. 1984). The synthetic profiles are broadened for the value of the projected rotational velocity, vsini = 1.7 km s-1 (Liu et al. 2015). The differences in the atmospheric models give a first indication of the sensitivity of the studied lines to changes in the atmosphere. The VALC model has the lowest minimum temperature value and the steepest temperature gradient towards the minimum. Therefore, the 4571 Å line, forming in LTE around the minimum temperature region, shows a deeper core. Indeed, the main correction made to the VALC model that led to the construction of new models, such as the FALC and the ALC, was the inclusion of more line haze lines so that the temperature gradient towards the minimum became less steep from less overionization. The b triplet does not seem to be affected by any change in the atmospheric model. The best agreement with the observed spectrum is obtained with the FALC model that has a higher minimum temperature value and a less steep temperature gradient towards the minimum with respect to the VALC model.

We also performed some tests to show how the method of treating the background line-opacity, described in Busà et al. (2001), improves the modeling of the Mg i lines. In Fig. 2 (upper panel) we plot, as an example, the synthetic profiles of the b2 line obtained with the ALC model of the solar atmosphere with (dashed line) and without (dotted line) line blanketing. The solid line is the observed profile. For the 4571 Å line, in the lower panel of Fig. 2, we plot the contribution function to line depression (Magain 1986) versus height, for the same atmospheric model as in the upper panel with (dashed line) and without (dotted line) line blanketing. When we do not take into account any correction to the MULTI background opacity, the line forms at lower heights in the solar atmosphere, and therefore becomes less sensitive to changes in the chromosphere and at the temperature minimum (we refer to the discussion in Sect. 3).

thumbnail Fig. 2

Upper panel: synthetic profiles of the Mg i b2 line obtained with the ALC model of the solar atmosphere with (dashed line) and without (dotted line) line blanketing. The solid line is the observed profile. Lower panel: contribution function to line-depression (erg cm3 s-1 Å-1) for the 4571 Å line versus height, for the same atmospheric model as in the upper panel, with (dashed line) and without (dotted line) line blanketing.

2.2. Atmospheric models

We selected from the Next-Gen database a grid of photospheric models of a stellar atmosphere with effective temperatures Teff = 4800,5200,5600,5800,6200 and 6400 K, solar gravity and solar metallicity, that is, log g = 4.5 and [A / H] = 0.0. Starting from the photospheric models, we built a grid of atmospheres including photosphere, chromosphere, and transition region (TR). The chromosphere is represented by a linear dependence of the temperature as a function of log m. We indicate with log m0 (column mass value) the point where it starts in the photosphere and with the coordinates (log m1, T1) the point where the chromosphere ends and the TR starts. By giving the value of log m0, we fix the minimum value of the temperature in the atmospheric model, and, by giving (log m1, T1) we fix the thickness of the chromosphere and the temperature gradient. We also need to specify the temperature gradient in the TR by giving the value of the last point of the model (log m2, T2). We used, as for the chromospheric segment, a linear dependence of T as a function of log m and for all the models the transition region gradient is the same. The values of log m0, log m1, T1, log m2 and T2 are indicated in Table 1 for the six models created from the same starting photosphere for each photospheric model, identified by the effective temperature, Teff. We refer to the different models with the names indicated in the first column, given by the values of log m0, log m1, and T1. The names of the models are defined as mxx_myy_zzz where xx = −log m0 × 10, yy = −log m1 × 10 and zzz = T1/ 100. The most active models are the ones with a higher value of log m0 (the chromosphere starts deeper in the photosphere) and/or a steeper chromospheric temperature gradient. As an example, Fig. 3 shows six atmospheric models created by starting from a photosphere with Teff = 6200 K, log g = 4.5 and [A / H] = 0.0. We did not consider the possibility of log m1 greater than −6. Considering the formation depth in the solar atmosphere of the lines studied in this paper, their profiles should not be influenced by a change in the atmospheric model occurring in the upper chromosphere.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Atmospheric models obtained by adding a chromosphere and a transition region to the Next-Gen photosphere with Teff = 6200 K. The six models differ in the chromospheric temperature gradient and/or the temperature minimum value as indicated in Table 1.

Table 1

Values of log m (g cm-2) and T (K) used to build the six atmospheric models starting from the Next-Gen photospheres.

Table 2

Temperature, gravity, iron abundance, projected rotational velocity and activity index of the stars studied here.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Mg i 4571 Å (left panel), b2 at 5173 Å (middle) and b2 core (right) observed line profiles for the stars in Table 2. The third panel magnifies the b2 core.

3. Results

3.1. Stellar spectra

In order to compare the obtained synthetic profiles with observed ones, we selected eight stellar spectra from the high-resolution (R = 80 000) and high-signal-to-noise (300–500) UVES Paranal Observatory Project (UVES POP) library (Bagnulo et al. 2003). The chosen stars have solar gravity and solar metallicity and effective temperatures in the range ~4800–6400 K, and show magnetic activity; all the Mg lines under study are available in the UVES POP library. Table 2 presents the atmospheric parameters of the selected stars collected from the literature. The first column shows the ID of the star, the second column gives the effective temperature, the third column provides the iron abundance and the fourth the surface gravity. The fifth column gives the projected rotational velocity and the last column gives the level of activity measured with two different activity indices RHK\hbox{$R'_{\rm HK}$} or R8662\hbox{$R'_{8662}$}, depending on the star and the measurement available in the literature. Traditionally, the Ca ii H and K resonance lines at 3968 and 3934 Å have been used as chromospheric diagnostics. However, observations of these lines in faint stars can be difficult, due to often low stellar flux in the blue, and the relatively poor blue response of many CCD detectors. In contrast, the Ca ii infrared triplet lines at 8498, 8542, and 8662 Å are strong and their location in the red makes them more suitable for CCD observations (Soderblom et al. 1993; Andretta et al. 2005; Busà et al. 2007; Marsden et al. 2009). The values of gravity and metallicity are not available for all the stars in the literature. (We recall that the atmospheric models are built starting from photospheres of solar gravity and metallicity, log g = 4.5 and [A / H] = 0.0.)

Figure 4 shows the observed profiles of the stars in Table 2 for the spectral lines we are studying, the 4571 Å line (left panel) and the central line of the b triplet at 5173 Å (middle and right panel). The profiles differ mainly because of the different effective temperatures of the stars. Both lines show a shallower core and a larger width with increasing temperature. The only star that displays a different behavior, showing a shallower core than expected, is the IC 2391 98. This happens because the core depth and the width of the lines are also influenced by the value of vsini (shallower core and larger width with increasing projected rotational velocity) and this star has the largest value of vsini with respect to all the other stars.

Table 3

Values of Teff and vsini used to create the atmospheric models and the synthetic profiles for the stars in Table 2.

3.2. Comparison with the stellar spectra

Comparisons to the observed profiles are displayed in Figs. 512. For each star, we over-plot, to the observed profile (blue solid thick line), the synthetic profiles obtained with the six different atmospheric models, built as described in Sect. 2.2 starting from the corresponding photospheric model with the Teff of the star. The synthetic profiles are plotted using the same line styles as in Fig. 3 and different colors to distinguish between the atmospheric models. In Table 3 we indicate, for each star, the value of Teff used to create the atmospheric models and the value of vsini adopted, starting from the values reported in the literature indicated in Table 2. Indicated in the last two columns are the atmospheric models that best fit the observed profiles of the 4571 Å and the b2 line as deduced by a visual inspection of the figure. All the synthetic profiles are broadened for the vsini value listed in Table 3. For the b triplet we plot only the b2 line at 5172.68 Å, since all three lines forming the triplet behave in the same way. We show only the comparison with the core of the b2 line, since we are interested only in activity at chromospheric level where the core forms, while the wings are photospheric. If we change the stellar parameters (i.e., pressure, gravity and/or metallicity), and/or the opacity routines as input to the numerical code, we could be able to define an ad-hoc photosphere for each star, however diagnosing the stellar parameters is beyond the scope of this work. Some of the observed profiles of the 4571 Å line are blended in the blue wing with a Ti i line. This line is identified in the solar spectrum at 4570.91 Å (Moore et al. 1966) and is relatively weak, while becoming more prominent in colder stars.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Mg i 4571 Å (left panel) and 5173 Å (b2, right) observed and synthetic line profiles for the HD 73722 star. The solid thick lines are the observed profiles while the thin lines (with the same line style as in Fig. 3) are the synthetic profiles obtained by using the different atmospheric models described in Table 1.

thumbnail Fig. 6

As in Fig. 5 but for IC 2391 73.

thumbnail Fig. 7

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 211415.

thumbnail Fig. 8

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 74497.

thumbnail Fig. 9

As in Fig. 5 but for IC 2391 98.

thumbnail Fig. 10

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 149661.

thumbnail Fig. 11

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 22049.

thumbnail Fig. 12

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 209100.

As we explained in Sect. 2.2, the most active atmospheric models are the ones with higher values of log m0 and/or steeper chromospheric temperature gradients. From Figs. 512, we can see that higher activity results in deeper and broader synthetic profiles. The differences between the synthetic profiles are more evident in the core of the 4571 Å line that seems very sensitive to local changes in the atmospheric model, and grows for lower Teff. This is in accordance with the results of Langangen et al. (2009) that found the 4571 Å line to be a good diagnostic of the lower chromosphere, especially for cooler atmospheres such as sunspots, where they studied this line. In particular, in Figs. 10 and 12 we can also see that a change in the degree of activity can result in a central reversal of the 4571 Å line. The models often produce a central reversal in this line that is however not observed, and appears when the formation of the line extends above the temperature minimum region, thus depending on the position of the temperature minimum in the models. Mauas et al. (1988) proposed that this reversal was a consequence of possible uncertainties in the atomic model whereas Langangen et al. (2009) and the present work show that increasing the realism in the model atom does not remove the reversal. Indeed, Langangen et al. (2009) demonstrated that this central reversal is very sensitive to the position of the chromospheric temperature rise. Our results show the same dependence of the central reversal on the the position of the chromospheric temperature rise (higher value of log m0 corresponding to none or less pronounced reversal), thus confirming those of Langangen et al. (2009). Moreover, we also find a dependence of the central reversal on the chromospheric temperature gradient. A steeper rise of the chromospheric temperature corresponds to a larger amount of emission in the line core. Therefore, on the basis of this result the observations can constrain the structure of the temperature minimum, in particular the lowest possible position of the chromospheric temperature rise and its steepest gradient. We note that the 3D structure of the solar atmosphere could make these constraints less tight. It would be interesting to verify the sensitivity of the 4571 line to the position of the temperature minimum, using solar high-spatial- and temporal-resolution observations of its core.

We are able to reproduce the Mg i 4571 Å profile for all the observed stars with a combination of Teff, vsini and atmospheric model. For two objects, the star HD 73722 and the IC 2391 73 (Figs. 5 and 6), we cannot reproduce the observed 4571 Å line. This, however, could depend on the choice of the photospheric Teff of the star in the atmospheric model, on the value of vsini used for the correction, or on the fact that even if we looked for stars with solar gravity and solar metallicity, these values are an approximation as we can see from Table 2. Indeed, the star HD 73722 shows the lowest value of log g. Obviously, this comment applies to all the stars.

In Sect. 2.1, we have discussed the importance of introducing some treatment of ultraviolet line-haze opacities into the calculations. We have shown that without any correction to the MULTI background opacity, the 4571 Å line forms at lower heights in the solar atmosphere becoming less sensitive to changes at the temperature minimum. The effect of this change of formation height, in the case of the stars we are studying, results in small or insignificant differences in the synthetic profiles of the 4571 Å line, obtained with different atmospheric models for the same star.

Regarding the b2 profile, there are clear problems in reproducing the width of the line core. As we have already explained in Sect. 1, the cores of the b lines form in conditions of NLTE and the populations of the lower and upper levels, involved in their formation, are determined by contributions from photons coming from atmospheric layers other than the ones in which they form. Therefore, it can be expected that local variations of the atmospheric structure do not bring large changes in the line intensities.

4. Conclusions

We analyzed the potential of four Mg i spectral lines, the 4571 Å line and the b triplet, as diagnostics of chromospheric activity. Starting from the Next-Gen photospheric models, we built a grid of atmospheric models and solved the coupled equations of radiative transfer and statistical equilibrium, obtaining synthetic profiles. These profiles have been compared with observed spectra of main sequence, solar-like stars with effective temperatures Teff = 4800,5200,5600,5800,6200 and 6400 K, solar gravity and solar metallicity.

The comparison between the synthetic spectra and the observations is good for the Mg i 4571 Å line for stars with T< 6000 K while there are clear problems in reproducing the width of the line core for the b triplet and/or the wings. We believe that this problem could be alleviated, or even solved, by adopting for each star a photospheric model more closely matching its stellar parameters (temperature, pressure, gravity and/or metallicity). However, the grid adopted in this work (Next-Gen) is not sufficiently fine for this purpose and creating ad hoc photospheric models is beyond the scope of this work.

From our analysis, we can conclude that the Mg i 4571 Å line, suggested by Langangen et al. (2009) to be a good diagnostic of the lower solar chromosphere, is significantly sensitive to changes in the activity, obtained as local changes in the atmospheric model around the minimum temperature where the line forms, also in solar-like stars. We find the same dependency of the amount of emission in the line core of this line on the position of the chromospheric temperature rise as described by Langangen et al. (2009) and also a further dependence on the gradient of the chromospheric temperature. A lack of central reversal in the 4571 Å line provides a constraint on the lowest possible position of the chromospheric temperature rise and its gradient. Alongside this work, we also want to underline the importance of including a correct treatment of ultraviolet line opacities in the Mg atomic model. Without any correction to the MULTI background opacity, the 4571 Å line forms at lower heights and becomes less sensitive to changes in the atmospheric models and, in particular, at the temperature minimum. We verified that, for the stars we have studied in this work, without using any line blanketing treatment, the synthetic profiles of the 4571 Å line obtained with different atmospheric models for the same star, do not differ significantly.

The Mg i b triplet shows instead a very small and insignificant response to the local atmospheric structure, in the same sample of solar-like stars selected for this work. These lines are not responsive diagnostics for atmospheric stratification.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the ASI/INAF contracts I/013/12/0 and I/013/12/1. We thank the referee for useful suggestions and comments.

References

  1. Andretta, V., Busà, I., Gomez, M. T., & Terranegra, L. 2005, A&A, 430, 669 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anstee, S. D., & O’Mara, B. J. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 859 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1995, ApJ, 445, 433 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altrock, R. C., & Canfield, R. C. 1974, ApJ, 194, 733 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Altrock, R. C., & Cannon, C. J. 1972, Sol. Phys., 26, 21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Athay, R. G., & Canfield, R. C. 1969, ApJ, 156, 695 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Athay, R. G., & House, L. L. 1962, ApJ, 135, 500 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 2008, ApJ, 175, 229 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bagnulo, S., Jehin, E., Ledoux, C., et al. 2003, The Messenger, 114, 10 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  10. Basri, G., Wilcots, E., & Stout, N. 1989, PASP, 101, 528 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Battistini, C., & Bensby, T. 2015, A&A, 577, A9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Busà, I., Andretta, V., Gomez, M. T., & Terranegra, L. 2001, A&A, 373, 993 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Busà, I., Aznar Cuadrado, R., Terranegra, L., Andretta, V., & Gomez, M. T. 2007, A&A, 466, 1089 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carlsson, M. 1986, Uppsala Astron. Obs. Rep., 33 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlsson, M., Rutten, R. J., & Shchukina, N. G. 1992, A&A, 253, 567 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. Casagrande, L., Schoenrich, R., Asplund, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A138 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cenarro, A. J., Peletier, R. F., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 664 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deridder, G., & van Rensbergen, W. 1976, A&AS, 23, 147 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  19. D’Orazi, V., & Randich, S. 2009, A&A, 501, 553 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duncan, D. K., Vaughan, A. H., Wilson, O. C., et al. 1991, ApJS, 76, 383 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fontenla, J. M., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1993, ApJ, 406, 319 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Glebocki, R., & Gnaciǹski, P. 2005, 5, VizieR Online Data Catalog: III/244 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gomez da Silva, J., Santos, N. C., Boisse, I., Dumusque, X., & Lovis, C. 2014, A&A, 566, A66 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall, J. C., Lockwood, G. W., & Skiff, B. A. 2007, AJ, 133, 862 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heasley, J. N., & Allen, M. S. 1980, ApJ, 237, 255 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Henry, T. J., Soderblom, D. R., Donahue, R. A., & Baliunas, S. L. 1996, AJ, 111, 439 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Katsova, M. M., & Livshits, M. A. 2011, Astron. Rep., 55, 1123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kurucz, R. L., Furenlid, I., Brault, J., & Testerman, L. 1984, Solar flux atlas from 296 to 1300 nm (National Solar Observatory) [Google Scholar]
  29. Langangen, Ø., & Carlsson, M. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1892 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, C., Ruchti, G., Feltzing, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Magain, P. 1986, A&A, 163, 135 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  32. Marsden, S. C., Carter, B. D., & Donati, J. F. 2009, MNRAS, 339, 888 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marsden, S. C., Petit, P., Jeffers, S. V., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3517 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mashonkina, L. I., Shimanskaya, N. N., & Sakhibullin, N. A. 1996, Astron. Rep., 40, 187 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mauas, P. J., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1988, ApJ, 330, 1008 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mermilliod, J. C., Mayor, M., & Udry, S. 2009, A&A, 498, 949 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Merle, T., Thévenin, F., Pichon, B., & Bigot, L. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 863 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Merle, T., Thévenin, F., Belyaev, A. K. et al. 2013a, in New Advances in Stellar Physics: From Microscopic to Macroscopic Processes, eds. G. Alecian, Y. Lebreton, O. Richard, & G. Vauclair, EAS Pub. Ser., 63, 331 [Google Scholar]
  39. Merle, T., Thévenin, F., Guitou, M., et al. 2013b, in SF2A-2013: Proc. Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, eds. L. Cambresy, F. Martins, E. Nuss, & A. Palacios, 247 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mihalas, D. 1978, Stellar Atmospheres, 2nd edn. (San Francisco: Freeman & Co) [Google Scholar]
  41. Montes, D., Ramsey, L. W., & Welty, A. D. 1999a, ApJS, 123, 283 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Montes, D., Saar, S. H., Collier Cameron, A., & Unruh, Y. C. 1999b, MNRAS, 305, 45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Moore, C. E., Minnaert, M. G. J., & Houtgast, J. 1966, The solar spectrum 2935 Å to 8770 Å, National Bureau of Standards Monograph (Washington: US Government Printing Office) [Google Scholar]
  44. Nördstrom, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 418, 989 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., & Vaughan, A. H. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Osorio, Y., & Barklem, P. S. 2016, A&A, 586, A120 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. Osorio, Y., Barklem, P. S., Lind, K., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A53 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sasso, C. 2004, Thesis, University of Göttingen [Google Scholar]
  49. Shimanskaya, N. N., Mashonkina, L. I., & Sakhibullin, N. A. 2000, Astron. Rep., 44, 530 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Soderblom, D. R., Stauffer, J. R., Hudon, J. D., & Jones, B. F. 1993, ApJS, 85, 315 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Soubiran, C., Bienaymé, O., Mishenina, T. V., & Kovtyukh, V. V. 2008, A&A, 480, 91 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stauffer, J. R., Hartmann, L. W., Prosser, C. F., et al. 1997, ApJ, 479, 776 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vernazza, J. E., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1981, ApJS, 45, 635 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. White, O. R., Altrock, R. C., Brault, J. W., & Slaughter, C. D. 1972, Sol. Phys., 23, 18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilson, O. C. 1978, ApJ, 226, 379 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhao, G., & Gehren, T. 2000, A&A, 362, 1077 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao, G., Butler, K., & Gehren, T. 1998, A&A, 333, 219 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Values of log m (g cm-2) and T (K) used to build the six atmospheric models starting from the Next-Gen photospheres.

Table 2

Temperature, gravity, iron abundance, projected rotational velocity and activity index of the stars studied here.

Table 3

Values of Teff and vsini used to create the atmospheric models and the synthetic profiles for the stars in Table 2.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Mg i 4571 Å (left panel) and 5173 Å (b2, middle and right panel) observed and synthetic line profiles for the Sun. The third panel magnifies the b2 core. The black solid lines are the observed profiles (Kitt Peak solar flux atlas, Kurucz et al. 1984) while the red dotted, green dashed, and blue dash-dotted lines are the synthetic profiles obtained by using three different atmospheric models, VALC, FALC, and ALC, respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Upper panel: synthetic profiles of the Mg i b2 line obtained with the ALC model of the solar atmosphere with (dashed line) and without (dotted line) line blanketing. The solid line is the observed profile. Lower panel: contribution function to line-depression (erg cm3 s-1 Å-1) for the 4571 Å line versus height, for the same atmospheric model as in the upper panel, with (dashed line) and without (dotted line) line blanketing.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Atmospheric models obtained by adding a chromosphere and a transition region to the Next-Gen photosphere with Teff = 6200 K. The six models differ in the chromospheric temperature gradient and/or the temperature minimum value as indicated in Table 1.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Mg i 4571 Å (left panel), b2 at 5173 Å (middle) and b2 core (right) observed line profiles for the stars in Table 2. The third panel magnifies the b2 core.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Mg i 4571 Å (left panel) and 5173 Å (b2, right) observed and synthetic line profiles for the HD 73722 star. The solid thick lines are the observed profiles while the thin lines (with the same line style as in Fig. 3) are the synthetic profiles obtained by using the different atmospheric models described in Table 1.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

As in Fig. 5 but for IC 2391 73.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 211415.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 74497.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

As in Fig. 5 but for IC 2391 98.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 149661.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 22049.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 12

As in Fig. 5 but for HD 209100.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.