EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 589 (May 2016) A&A, 589 (2016) L4 Full HTML
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 589, May 2016
Article Number L4
Number of page(s) 5
Section Letters
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628203
Published online 06 April 2016

© ESO, 2016

1. Introduction

The evolution of young stellar objects (YSOs), over a wide range of masses, seems to be characterised by significant accretion from a magnetised circumstellar disc and ejection of collimated jets. Both processes are tightly related: jets can remove excess angular momentum, so that some of the disc material can accrete onto the star (see, e.g. Königl & Pudritz 2000; Pudritz et al. 2007). Their interplay is relatively well understood and tested in low-mass YSOs, whereas not much is known about high-mass YSOs (HMYSOs; M> 8 M⊙; O and early B spectral types), as their formation mechanism and evolution are still a matter of debate (see, e.g. Tan et al. 2014). Substantial progress in understanding the formation mechanism of HMYSOs is gained by connecting the gas dynamics close to the forming star (e.g. Kraus et al. 2010; Ilee et al. 2013; Cesaroni et al. 2014; Sanna et al. 2015) with the parsec-scale jet and outflow emission being driven by the central accreting source (e.g. Sanna et al. 2014; Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015a). Moreover, compelling observational evidence for the accretion disc scenario has recently come from the detection of compact discs in Keplerian rotation (e.g. Kraus et al. 2010; Ilee et al. 2013; Cesaroni et al. 2014) and parsec-scale collimated jets driven by HMYSOs (e.g. Stecklum et al. 2009; Varricatt et al. 2010; Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015a).

Table 1

Log of the VLTI/AMBER observations of IRAS 13481-6124.

IRAS 13481-6124 (α(J2000) = 13:51:37.856, δ(J2000) = −61:39:07.52) is among the few HMYSOs where an accretion disc (Kraus et al. 2010; Ilee et al. 2013; Boley et al. 2016), an outflow, and a collimated parsec-scale jet (Kraus et al. 2010; Stecklum et al. 2012; Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015a) have been detected. Located at a distance of ~3.2 kpc, IRAS 13481-6124 has a bolometric luminosity of 5.7 × 104L⊙ (Lumsden et al. 2013). By modelling the spectral energy distribution (SED), Grave & Kumar (2009) inferred an age of ~104 yr and a protostellar mass of ~20 M⊙ (i.e. an O9 ZAMS spectral type). Near-infrared (NIR) interferometric observations with the Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI) in the K-band continuum revealed a compact dusty disc (~5.4 mas in diameter, or ~17.3 au at 3.2 kpc; Kraus et al. 2010), tilted by ~45° with respect to the plane of the sky. Modelling of the CO band-head emission lines at 2.3 μm suggests a disc in Keplerian rotation (Ilee et al. 2013). Perpendicular to the disc, a well-collimated (precession angle ~8°) parsec-scale jet has also been detected (with position angle – PA – of ~206°/26° east of north, blue- and red-shifted lobes, respectively; Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015a), being traced by shocked H2 and [Fe ii] lines. The shocked H2 emission is observed down to ~20 000 au from the source (Stecklum et al. 2012). Closer to the source (a few arcseconds), the H2 emission is mostly excited by fluorescence and it is not detected at the smallest spatial scales observed with SINFONI (~0.1″ or ~320 au; Stecklum et al. 2012). NIR spectroscopy also shows bright H i emission, confined to the HMYSO circumstellar environment (≤10 000 au; Stecklum et al. 2012). The Brγ line on source shows a shallow P Cygni profile and high-velocity wings (several hundred km s-1; Stecklum et al. 2012). Their spectro-astrometric analysis indicates a photocentre shift between line and continuum. The Brγ line profile might then be the product of different kinematical components, which originate from different locations: magnetospheric accretion flows, a hot disc atmosphere, strong winds from the stellar surface, or from the inner regions of the disc (within a few au), or an extended and collimated ionised jet.

To clarify the nature of the different kinematic components of the Brγ line and probe the circumstellar environment of IRAS 13481-6124, we therefore carried out, for the first time, VLTI/AMBER spectro-interferometric observations of this HMYSO at medium spectral resolution. This is the first NIR interferometric study that spatially and spectrally resolves an HMYSO in both continuum and Brγ line.

Section 2 reports our interferometric observations and data reduction, while the interferometric results are presented in Sect. 3. Finally, in Sect. 4, we discuss the origin of the Brγ in IRAS 13481-6124.

2. Observations and data reduction

IRAS 13481-6124 was observed on the 28 February 2013 in two runs at the ESO/VLTI with AMBER (Petrov et al. 2007) and the UT1-UT2-UT3 telescope configuration. The projected baseline lengths extend from ~38 m to ~85 m, and their position angle ranges between ~38° and ~62°, i.e. relatively close to being parallel to the jet PA. Details of the observational settings are reported in Table 1.

We used AMBER medium spectral resolution mode in the K-band (MR-2.1 mode with nominal R = 1500) covering the spectral range from 1.926 to 2.275 μm around the Brγ-line emission (at 2.166 μm). Although IRAS 13481-6124 in the K band is bright enough (K = 4.9 mag) to be observed interferometrically with AMBER and the UTs, its H-band magnitude (H = 7.6 mag) exceeds the limit for employing the fringe tracker FINITO (Gai et al. 2004), which works in that band. The adopted detector integration time (DIT) was 0.3 s per interferogram and we integrated on source for about 25 and 30 min in the first and second run, respectively. Owing to the better average seeing of the second run (~0.75″ vs. ~0.95″) and the slightly longer exposure on source, the second-run data have a higher S/N ratio. Star HD 103125 was observed before and after the science observations with the same observational settings, and used as an interferometric calibrator to derive the transfer function. To reduce our interferograms, we applied our own data reduction software, that is based on the P2VM algorithm (Tatulli et al. 2007) and that provides us with wavelength-dependent visibilities, wavelength-dependent differential phases, closure phases, and wavelength-calibrated spectra. The wavelength calibration was refined using the numerous telluric lines present in the observed wavelength range (for more details on the wavelength calibration method, see Weigelt et al. 2011; Garcia Lopez et al. 2015). We estimate an uncertainty in the wavelength calibration of ~1.5 Å (~20 km s-1). The spectral resolution measured on the spectrally unresolved telluric features around the Brγ line is R ~ 2200 or Δv ~ 140 km s-1. To convert the observed wavelengths into radial velocities, we used a local standard of rest (LSR) velocity of −37.9 km s-1 (Lumsden et al. 2013). Therefore all the velocities provided in this paper are with respect to the LSR.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Left: panel 1. AMBER-MR interferometric measurements of the Brγ line in IRAS 13481-6124 for run 1 (inserts 1a–1d). From top to bottom: line flux (1a), wavelength-dependent visibilities (1b), differential phases (1c), and closure phase (1d), observed at three different projected baselines (see labels in figure). For clarity, the differential phases of the first and last baselines are shifted by +20° and −20°, respectively. Middle left: panel 2. Visibilities and continuum-corrected (pure) Brγ-line visibilities of our AMBER-MR observation of IRAS 13481-6124 for run 1 (inserts 2b–2d). From top to bottom: line flux (2a), visibilities of first (2b), second (2c) and third baseline (2d). Middle right: panel 3. AMBER-MR interferometric measurements of the Brγ line in IRAS 13481-6124 for run 2 (inserts 3a–3d). Right: panel 4. Visibilities and continuum-corrected (pure) Brγ-line visibilities of our AMBER-MR observation of IRAS 13481-6124 for run 2 (inserts 4b–4d). Blue dashed lines encompass the emission peak of the Brγ line.
Open with DEXTER

3. Results

Our AMBER-MR spectrum shows a rising continuum and a bright Brγ emission line with a P Cygni profile (inserts 1a–4a of Fig. 1). No other lines above a three sigma threshold are detected in the spectrum. Figure 1 shows our interferometric observables (line profile − inserts 1a–4a; visibilities − inserts 1b and 3b; differential phases − inserts 1c and 3c, closure phase − inserts 1d and 3d) of the Brγ line and adjacent continuum for the first (Panel 1) and second run (Panel 3) along with the inferred continuum-corrected Brγ-line visibilities (inserts 2b–2d and 4b–4d) in four spectral channels (namely those with line-to-continuum ratio larger or equal to 1.1) of run 1 (Panel 2) and run 2 (Panel 4). Visibilities give information on the size of the emitting region (continuum and/or line), whereas the closure phase quantifies its asymmetry. Differential phases are a measure of the photocentre shift of the line with respect to the continuum.

The upper inserts of Fig. 1 (1a–4a) display the Brγ-line profile normalised to the continuum. The line is spectrally resolved and shows a wide range of velocities (from ~–500 to 500 km s-1). The emission line peaks at about 50 km s-1, with a broad red-shifted wing extending up to ~500 km s-1. The absorption feature on the blue-shifted side ranges from about −500 to −150 km s-1. The P Cygni profile indicates the presence of outflowing matter in the form of a stellar wind or jet, which produces the typical blue-shifted absorption feature through self-absorption (see, e.g. Mitchell et al. 1991). The outflow terminal velocity is ~–500 km s-1.

In Fig. 1, upper-middle (1b and 3b) and lower-middle (1c and 3c) inserts of Panel 1 (left) and Panel 3 (middle-right) show the wavelength-dependent visibilities and differential phases for the three observed baselines of run 1 (Panel 1) and run 2 (Panel 1), respectively, whereas the closure phases are shown in the lower inserts (1b and 3b). The results of the two runs are similar although, as mentioned in Sect. 2, the second run data have higher S/N ratio. Across the line profile, changes in the visibility and differential phase with respect to the continuum are observed. Blue dashed lines depict the position of the Brγ-emission peak in the four panels.

The Brγ visibility at the line peak is larger than the continuum visibility at all six baselines (see middle-upper panels of left and middle-right inserts in Fig. 1), indicating that, on average, the Brγ-emitting region is spatially resolved and more compact than the continuum. The absolute visibilities of the shortest baselines (red and green lines) display higher values, which indicates that both continuum and line are less spatially resolved along these baselines with respect to the longest ones. These short baselines are comparable in length and thus the wavelength-dispersed visibilities are very similar. Notably, the values of the visibility across the Brγ-absorption feature at the two longest baselines (85 and 81 m, PA = 45° and 53°, respectively) are slightly smaller than the average continuum visibility. This means that the Brγ photons at high blue-shifted velocities must originate from a region larger than the continuum, whereas the red-shifted Brγ emission must come from a region that is smaller than the continuum. In other words, the size of the blue-shifted gas in absorption is larger than that of the emitting gas, suggesting the presence of a wind or an outflow.

The differential phase (DP) at the four longest baselines displays an “S” shape, more pronounced at the 85 and 81 m baselines, whereas the differential phase at the shortest baselines (40 and 38 m, PA = 62° and 54°, respectively) shows a significant displacement with respect to the continuum that appears only close to the line peak and along the red-shifted wing (see middle-lower panels of left and middle-right inserts in Fig. 1). This indicates that the outflow is detected mainly at the longest baselines and at PAs up to 53°, i.e. that the outflow is quite collimated (within ~27° from the jet axis, PA 206°/26°). Moreover, since the differential phases are related to the line photocentre shifts with respect to the continuum, our findings indicate that both red-shifted and blue-shifted line emission wings, at the longest baselines, are spatially extended and located in opposite directions with respect to the continuum emission.

We note that the observed closure phase (CP; see lower panels of left and middle-right inserts in Fig. 1) differs from zero. Inside the error bars, no significant closure-phase variations of the Brγ line, with respect to the continuum, are detected. This is because of the high noise level in the wavelength differential CPs (~10°), which is about one order of magnitude higher than that in the DPs. The non-zero closure phase originates from the asymmetry of the brightness distribution of the continuum. Owing to the disc inclination of ~45° with respect to the plane of the sky, the far side of the inner disc rim (i.e. the one towards the blue-shifted side of the jet) displays an area larger (i.e. brighter) than the near side (see panel d of Fig. 1 in Kraus et al. 2010). To confirm this scenario, we compare our observations with the synthetic images around 2.16 μm that are derived from the radiative transfer model presented by Kraus et al. (2010). Although this model was originally adjusted to fit AMBER visibilities and closure phases taken with the auxiliary telescopes, it also provides a very good fit to our new, higher SNR UT data. The predicted CP value of ~26° is comparable to the measured values of 25°±4° (run 2) and 29°±6° (run 1). Notably the continuum asymmetry also affects the observed DPs of the Brγ line, causing the blue-shifted DPs to be systematically smaller than the red-shifted ones.

To infer the size of the Brγ-emitting region across the different velocity channels, we first compute the continuum-subtracted (or pure-line) visibilities at the six baselines (see middle-left and right inserts in Fig. 1), following Weigelt et al. (2007). The ring-fit diameter of the continuum is taken from Kraus et al. (2010) (5.4 mas or 17.3 au at 3.2 kpc). The average diameter of the Brγ-emitting region (averaged over 8 channels, 4 for each baseline, as plotted for the pure line visibilities of Fig. 1) is ~4 mas (i. e. ~13 au at 3.2 kpc) at the two shortest baselines (37.7 and 39.8 m), ~3.4 mas (~11 au) at the medium baselines (43.7 and 45.9 m), and ~2 mas (6.4 au) at the longest baselines (80.5 and 84.9 m). On average the size of the Brγ-emitting region is smaller than the continuum-emitting region. It is worth noting, however, that the P Cygni absorption in the blue wing of the Brγ line makes the continuum correction of the visibility uncertain for wavelengths shorter than the peak wavelength of the emission line. In this case, the continuum-correction overestimates the size of the line-emitting region. This might explain why the values of the pure line visibilities (middle-left and right inserts of Fig. 1) decrease, moving from red-shifted to blue-shifted wavelengths. On the other hand, if this effect is real, it would imply that the two lobes are not spatially symmetric, probably because of the screening effect of the disc on the red-shifted lobe of the outflow.

Finally, the calibrated DPs were converted into photocentre shifts (p) of the Brγ-velocity components, with respect to the continuum emission, by solving the following equation: pi = (−DPiλ)/(2πBi), where pi is the photocentre displacement projection of the 2D photocentre vector p on the baseline Bi, and λ is the wavelength of the considered spectral channel (Le Bouquin et al. 2009). A single astrometric solution (i.e. a single 2D vector p) was fitted to all baselines within each spectral channel. As for the visibilities, we then subtracted the continuum contribution to get the photocentre displacements of the pure-line emitting region (see Eq. (3) in Kraus et al. 2012). Figure 2 shows the continuum-subtracted Brγ-line photocentre displacements (with the errorbars in polar coordinates), which were derived from the astrometric solution in the different (radial) velocity channels (colour coded). Both the inner rim, defined by the study of the NIR continuum (see Kraus et al. 2010), and the known jet axis (see Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015a), are shown as a black solid ellipse and red solid line, respectively. The red dashed ellipses indicate the uncertainty on the size of the inner rim (1.97 ± 0.37 mas; Kraus et al. 2010). Figure 2 shows that the photocentre-shifts in the blue-shifted (green, cyan and blue dots; from vr ~ −420 to ~–140 km s-1) and red-shifted (orange, red, and magenta dots; from vr ~140 to ~520 km s-1) wings of the Brγ are increasing considerably with increasing velocities and are roughly displaced along a straight line, close to the jet axis, in the blue- and red-shifted lobes, respectively. The significance of the red-shifted data points at the highest velocity (magenta dots) is reduced with respect to the other points since they are seen out of the obscuring disc only because of the large uncertainty of their position.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Brγ displacement for different (radial) velocity channels (with velocity bins from −550 to 550 km s-1) derived from the measured differential phases, after correcting for the continuum contribution. Different colours indicate different velocity bins. Black solid and red dashed ellipses indicate the extent of the K-band continuum with its uncertainty (1.94 ± 0.37 mas Kraus et al. 2010), whereas the red line shows the position of the jet axis (Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015a).
Open with DEXTER

The low-velocity components (black dots; with vr ~ −50 and 50 km s-1) are also aligned with the jet axis, but are much closer to the central source (≲2 au), indicating a strong acceleration of the gas in the inner 10 au. We note that, at 2 au, the Keplerian velocity of a 20 M⊙ object is ~95 km s-1 (or vr ~67  km s-1), that is, it is not spectrally resolved by our observations (Δv ~ 140 km s-1). Our findings thus suggest that, on the one hand, the high-velocity component is tracing the jet/outflow, and, on the other, the low-velocity component is tracing slow moving gas, such as a disc wind (in Keplerian rotation) or the very base of the jet, namely the region of the disc where the jet footpoints are located.

4. Origin of the Brγ line in IRAS 13481-6124

The origin of the Brγ line in YSOs is controversial and there are several physical mechanisms that could produce this emission, such as accretion of matter onto the star (e.g. Eisner et al. 2009), or outflowing material from a disc wind (e.g. Weigelt et al. 2011; Garcia Lopez et al. 2015; Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015b), extended wind or outflow (e.g. Garcia Lopez et al. 2016), or jet (e.g. Stecklum et al. 2012).

Our AMBER/VLTI observations of IRAS 13481-6124 suggest that the main Brγ emission emanates from an ionised jet. The observed Brγ P Cygni profile indicates the presence of a fast ionised jet/outflow (~500 km s-1). This value agrees well with the radio jet velocities measured in other HMYSOs (see, e.g. Heathcote et al. 1998; Martí et al. 1998; Curiel et al. 2006; Torrelles et al. 2011). Visibilities and differential phases at high velocities indicate that the outflowing matter is spatially extended, from a few au to a few tens of au, and the photocentre shifts grow with increasing radial velocities. Both observables also suggest that the flow is relatively well collimated (≲30°) close to the known parsec-scale jet PA, implying that we are observing a collimated wind or flow. Initial jet opening angles are typically ~30° in YSOs and a considerable degree of focusing in low-mass YSOs happens at several au from the source (see, e.g. Ray et al. 2007). It is thus reasonable to presume that the corresponding jet collimation in HMYSOs occurs at even larger distances from the source (a few tens of au). Indeed, as magneto-centrifugal launching models are scale-free (see, e.g. Ferreira 1997; Ferreira & Casse 2004; Pudritz et al. 2007), for higher masses the configuration readjusts to larger scales consistently with the different values of the gravitational potential. As IRAS 13481-6124 has a parsec-scale jet, we could then argue that the high-velocity component of the Brγ line (500 <vr < 100 km s-1) is tracing the (poorly collimated) jet, which extends from a few au to tens of au from the central source. On the other hand, the low-velocity component (vr< 100 km s-1), although partially resolved, is more compact, being located ≲2 au from the source and well inside the inner-rim disc. This slow moving gas component is also aligned with the jet axis. Owing to our limited spectral resolution and given that this velocity is also compatible with Keplerian rotation (at a distance of ≲2 au), this component might originate from a disc wind or the jet foot-point. We note that a similar geometry for the Brγ emission in another HMYSO (W 33A) was inferred by Davies et al. (2010) with spectro-astrometry. Finally, even if the error bars are considered, the Brγ visibility is lower than one, i.e. it is spatially resolved at the longest baselines, indicating that the bulk of the emission cannot originate from accretion, which would not be spatially resolved at our baselines. Moreover, infall gas would have free-fall velocities of several hundreds of km s-1, which are not detected close to the source.

In conclusion, most of the observed Brγ emission must originate from the ionised jet. In principle, it should be fully ionised because of being exposed to the UV radiation of a 20 M⊙ HMYSO (Tanaka et al. 2016). As for the case of irradiated jets in massive star-forming regions (see, e.g. Reipurth et al. 1998; Bally et al. 2006), the gas of the jet would then be fully traced by the HI emission and its denisty proportional to the HI line intensity. Therefore, measurements of intensity, velocity, and size of the Brγ-emitting region might provide a good estimate of the mass-loss rate.

Acknowledgments

A.C.G., R.G.L., and T.P.R. were supported by Science Foundation Ireland, grant 13/ERC/I2907. A.K. and S.K. acknowledge support from a STFC Ernest Rutherford fellowship and grant (ST/J004030/1, ST/K003445/1), and Marie-Sklodowska Curie CIG grant (Ref. 618910). A.S. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Priority Program 1573. This research has also made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic Services and the SIMBAD database operated at the CDS, Strasbourg, France.

References

  1. Bally, J., Licht, D., Smith, N., & Walawender, J. 2006, AJ, 131, 473 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boley, P. A., Kraus, S., de Wit, W.-J., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A78 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caratti o Garatti, A., Stecklum, B., Linz, H., Garcia Lopez, R., & Sanna, A. 2015a, A&A, 573, A82 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caratti o Garatti, A., Tambovtseva, L. V., Garcia Lopez, R., et al. 2015b, A&A, 582, A44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cesaroni, R., Galli, D., Neri, R., & Walmsley, C. M. 2014, A&A, 566, A73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Curiel, S., Ho, P. T. P., Patel, N. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 878 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies, B., Lumsden, S. L., Hoare, M. G., Oudmaijer, R. D., & de Wit, W.-J. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1504 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisner, J. A., Graham, J. R., Akeson, R. L., & Najita, J. 2009, ApJ, 692, 309 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferreira, J. 1997, A&A, 319, 340 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferreira, J., & Casse, F. 2004, Ap&SS, 292, 479 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gai, M., Menardi, S., Cesare, S., et al. 2004, in New Frontiers in Stellar Interferometry, ed. W. A. Traub, SPIE Conf. Ser., 5491, 528 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia Lopez, R., Tambovtseva, L. V., Schertl, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A84 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia Lopez, R., Kurosawa, R., Caratti o Garatti, A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 156 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grave, J. M. C., & Kumar, M. S. N. 2009, A&A, 498, 147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heathcote, S., Reipurth, B., & Raga, A. C. 1998, AJ, 116, 1940 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ilee, J. D., Wheelwright, H. E., Oudmaijer, R. D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2960 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Königl, A., & Pudritz, R. E. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 759 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kraus, S., Hofmann, K.-H., Menten, K. M., et al. 2010, Nature, 466, 339 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kraus, S., Monnier, J. D., Che, X., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Le Bouquin, J.-B., Absil, O., Benisty, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, L41 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lumsden, S. L., Hoare, M. G., Urquhart, J. S., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Martí, J., Rodríguez, L. F., & Reipurth, B. 1998, ApJ, 502, 337 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitchell, G. F., Maillard, J.-P., & Hasegawa, T. I. 1991, ApJ, 371, 342 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Petrov, R. G., Malbet, F., Weigelt, G., et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pudritz, R. E., Ouyed, R., Fendt, C., & Brandenburg, A. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 277 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ray, T., Dougados, C., Bacciotti, F., Eislöffel, J., & Chrysostomou, A. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 231 [Google Scholar]
  27. Reipurth, B., Bally, J., Fesen, R. A., & Devine, D. 1998, Nature, 396, 343 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanna, A., Cesaroni, R., Moscadelli, L., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A34 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanna, A., Surcis, G., Moscadelli, L., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, L3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stecklum, B., Caratti o Garatti, A., Davis, C., et al. 2009, Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc., 13, 619 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stecklum, B., Caratti o Garatti, A., & Linz, H. 2012, in Circumstellar Dynamics at High Resolution, eds. A. C. Carciofi, & T. Rivinius, ASP Conf. Ser., 464, 369 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tan, J. C., Beltrán, M. T., Caselli, P., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 149 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tanaka, K. E. I., Tan, J. C., & Zhang, Y. 2016, ApJ, 818, 52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tatulli, E., Millour, F., Chelli, A., et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Torrelles, J. M., Patel, N. A., Curiel, S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 627 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Varricatt, W. P., Davis, C. J., Ramsay, S., & Todd, S. P. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 661 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weigelt, G., Kraus, S., Driebe, T., et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 87 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weigelt, G., Grinin, V. P., Groh, J. H., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Log of the VLTI/AMBER observations of IRAS 13481-6124.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Left: panel 1. AMBER-MR interferometric measurements of the Brγ line in IRAS 13481-6124 for run 1 (inserts 1a–1d). From top to bottom: line flux (1a), wavelength-dependent visibilities (1b), differential phases (1c), and closure phase (1d), observed at three different projected baselines (see labels in figure). For clarity, the differential phases of the first and last baselines are shifted by +20° and −20°, respectively. Middle left: panel 2. Visibilities and continuum-corrected (pure) Brγ-line visibilities of our AMBER-MR observation of IRAS 13481-6124 for run 1 (inserts 2b–2d). From top to bottom: line flux (2a), visibilities of first (2b), second (2c) and third baseline (2d). Middle right: panel 3. AMBER-MR interferometric measurements of the Brγ line in IRAS 13481-6124 for run 2 (inserts 3a–3d). Right: panel 4. Visibilities and continuum-corrected (pure) Brγ-line visibilities of our AMBER-MR observation of IRAS 13481-6124 for run 2 (inserts 4b–4d). Blue dashed lines encompass the emission peak of the Brγ line.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Brγ displacement for different (radial) velocity channels (with velocity bins from −550 to 550 km s-1) derived from the measured differential phases, after correcting for the continuum contribution. Different colours indicate different velocity bins. Black solid and red dashed ellipses indicate the extent of the K-band continuum with its uncertainty (1.94 ± 0.37 mas Kraus et al. 2010), whereas the red line shows the position of the jet axis (Caratti o Garatti et al. 2015a).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.