Issue 
A&A
Volume 565, May 2014



Article Number  A55  
Number of page(s)  11  
Section  Stellar structure and evolution  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201322917  
Published online  08 May 2014 
CoRoT 105906206: a shortperiod and totally eclipsing binary with a δ Scuti type pulsator^{⋆,}^{⋆⋆}
^{1}
INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma,
via Frascati 33, 00040
Monte Porzio Catone,
Italy
email: ronaldo.dasilva@oaroma.inaf.it
^{2}
INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania,
via S. Sofia 78, 95123
Catania,
Italy
^{3}
Research and Scientific Support Department,
ESA/ESTEC, PO Box
299, 2200 AG
Noordwijk, The
Netherlands
^{4}
Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg,
Sternwarte 5, 07778
Tautenburg,
Germany
Received: 25 October 2013
Accepted: 19 March 2014
Aims. Eclipsing binary systems with pulsating components allow determination of several physical parameters of the stars, such as mass and radius, that can be used to constrain the modeling of stellar interiors and evolution when combined with the pulsation properties. We present the results of the study of CoRoT 105906206, an eclipsing binary system with a pulsating component located in the CoRoT LRc02 field.
Methods. The analysis of the CoRoT light curve was complemented by highresolution spectra from the Sandiford at McDonald Observatory and FEROS at ESO spectrographs, which revealed a doublelined spectroscopic binary. We used an iterative procedure to separate the pulsationinduced photometric variations from the eclipse signals. First, a Fourier analysis was used to identify the significant frequencies and amplitudes due to pulsations. Second, after removing the contribution of the pulsations from the light curve we applied the PIKAIA geneticalgorithm approach to derive the best parameters for describing the system orbital properties.
Results. The light curve cleaned for pulsations contains the partial eclipse of the primary and the total eclipse of the secondary. The system has an orbital period of about 3.694 days and is formed by a primary star with mass M_{1} = 2.25 ± 0.04 M_{⊙}, radius R_{1} = 4.24±0.02 R_{⊙}, and effective temperature T_{eff,1} = 6750 ± 150 K, and a secondary with M_{2} = 1.29 ± 0.03 M_{⊙}, R_{2} = 1.34±0.01 R_{⊙}, and T_{eff,2} = 6152 ± 162 K. The best solution for the parameters was obtained by taking into account the asymmetric modulation observed in the light curve, known as the O’Connell effect, presumably caused by Doppler beaming. The analysis of the Fourier spectrum revealed that the primary component has pmode pulsations in the range 5–13 d^{1}, which are typical of δ Scuti type stars.
Key words: binaries: eclipsing / binaries: spectroscopic / stars: oscillations / stars: individual: CoRoT 105906206
Based on the photometry collected by the CoRoT satellite and on spectroscopy obtained with the Sandiford spectrograph attached at the 2.1m telescope at McDonald Observatory (Texas, USA) and the FEROS spectrograph mounted on the ESO 2.2m telescope at ESO (La Silla, Chile). The CoRoT space mission was developed and is operated by the French space agency CNES, with participation of ESA’s RSSD and Science Programs, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Germany, and Spain.
Full Table 3 is only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.ustrasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.ustrasbg.fr/vizbin/qcat?J/A+A/565/A55
© ESO, 2014
1. Introduction
The study of eclipsing binary systems has gained a new perspective since the beginning of the CoRoT space mission (Baglin et al. 2006). The superb photometry achievable from space, combined with groundbased spectroscopy, allows a precise and independent determination of mass and radius of the components, among other parameters. In particular, by studying pulsating stars in eclipsing binaries, such as the Classical γ Dor and δ Sct type variables, one takes advantage of this parameter determination for the asteroseismic modeling of stellar structure and evolution. The CoRoT observations unveiled several targets suitable for this kind of research.
The δ Sct type variables are stars located in the classical instability strip on the HR diagram with effective temperatures in the range 6300 < T_{eff} < 9000 K, luminosities 0.6 < log (L/L_{⊙}) < 2.0, and masses between 1.5 and 2.5 M_{⊙}. Their evolutionary stages range from premain sequence to just evolved off the main sequence (about 2 mag above the ZAMS). They exhibit radial and/or nonradial pulsations, with loworder gravity (g) and/or pressure (p) modes with pulsation periods ranging from ∼15 min to ∼8 h (see, e.g., Rodríguez & Breger 2001; Buzasi et al. 2005; Uytterhoeven et al. 2011).
As a result, δ Sct type stars are an interesting class of objects since they lie in the transition region between stars having a convective (M < 2 M_{⊙}) or a radiative (M > 2 M_{⊙}) envelope. Their masses are in a range where stars are developing a convective zone, so they are useful for better understanding the mechanisms responsible for driving the pulsations. In this work we describe the analysis of CoRoT 105906206, an eclipsing binary system showing properties typical of δ Sct type variables.
Sections 2 and 3 present the details of the photometric and the spectroscopic observations, respectively. Section 4 describes how we derive the parameters of the system through the analysis of the light and radialvelocity curves, and Sect. 5 provides additional physical properties. The resulting pulsation frequencies are discussed in Sect. 6, and our final remarks and conclusions are in Sect. 7.
2. CoRoT photometry
CoRoT 105906206 was observed during the second “Long Run” in the direction of the Galactic center (LRc02), which lasted about 161 days. According to the information in the ExoDat database (Deleuil et al. 2009), this relatively bright target (V = 11.784 ± 0.044 mag) has a low level of contamination (L_{0} = 0.0077, where L_{0} is the ratio between contaminant and total fluxes) and thus was not removed from the observed flux. Our analysis used a white light curve, which is the sum of the three chromatic light curves from the CoRoT threecolor photometry (Auvergne et al. 2009). These colors (red, green, and blue channels) do not represent any standard photometric system. They were implemented to help with the identification of false alarms that can mimic the transit of a planet in front of the main target.
The original time series, containing about 388 000 points, was detrended to remove longterm variations and was cleaned from outliers using a sigmaclipping algorithm. Points flagged according to the description of Gruberbauer (2008) were also excluded. Only a few measurements (corresponding to about 0.5 days) were made in the longintegration mode (512 s) and they were not used in our analysis. The resulting light curve contains about 341 000 points collected in the shortintegration mode (32 s), from HJD = 2 454 573 to 2 454 717 days. A portion of the processed light curve is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 Portion of the CoRoT 105906206 white light curve normalized to the mean value. The full data extends over 144 days. 

Open with DEXTER 
3. Highresolution spectroscopy
We collected highresolution spectra of CoRoT 105906206 using two instruments: the Sandiford Echelle Spectrograph (McCarthy et al. 1993) attached to the Cassegrain focus of the 2.1m telescope of McDonald Observatory (Texas, USA), and the fiberfed FEROS Echelle Spectrograph (Kaufer et al. 1999) mounted on the MPG/ESO 2.2m telescope at La Silla Observatory (Chile).
Six Sandiford spectra were taken over six consecutive nights in May 2011 under fairly good sky conditions, with seeing typically varying between 1.0 and 2.0^{′′}. We set the grating angle to cover the wavelength range 5000–6000 Å and used the 1.0^{′′} wide slit, which yields a resolution of R ∼ 47 000. We adopted an exposure time of 1200–1800 sec and traced the radial velocity drift of the instrument by acquiring longexposed (T_{exp} = 30 s) ThAr spectra right before and after each epoch of observation.
Nineteen additional spectra were acquired in June and July 2011 with FEROS, which provides a resolution of R ∼ 48 000 and covers the wavelength range ∼3500–9200 Å. The sky conditions were photometric throughout the whole observation run, with seeing between 0.6 and 1.0^{′′}. Exposure times ranged between 1200 and 1800 s.
Fig. 2 Example of crosscorrelation used to derive the radial velocities of the CoRoT 105906206 components. Top panel: a portion of FEROS spectra showing the regions used (delimited by horizontal bars). Bottom panel: crosscorrelation peaks of the primary (1) and secondary (2) stars (dots) fitted by a doubleGaussian function (solid line). 

Open with DEXTER 
The spectra were reduced using IRAF^{1} standard routines and the FEROS automatic pipeline for order identification and extraction, background subtraction, flatfield correction and wavelength calibration. The radial velocities of the two components, together with their uncertainties, were derived with the fxcor task of IRAF by crosscorrelating each spectrum with a reference template. The standard stars HD 168009 (Udry et al. 1999) and HD 102870 (Nidever et al. 2002), both observed with the same instrumental setup, were used as template for Sandiford and FEROS spectra, respectively. Figure 2 shows the crosscorrelation function (CCF) peaks fitted by a double Gaussian curve. The uncertainty in each radialvelocity measurement and the fit of one or a double Gaussian depend on the separation of the peaks.
In the beginning of our study, we made a visual comparison of our spectra with the Digital Spectral Classification Atlas of R. O. Gray^{2}. It suggested a spectral type F3 for the primary star, corresponding to an effective temperature of about 6800 K. This is the value we used in this work, though it was later improved by the spectroscopic analysis of the primary decomposed spectrum, obtained through the disentangling method (see Sect. 3.1). At any rate, these determinations are in very good agreement. Concerning the secondary companion, it only makes a small contribution to the total flux, as can be seen in Fig. 2.
The derived radial velocities and the estimated uncertainties of the two stars of CoRoT 105906206 are listed in Table 1 and plotted in Fig. 3, together with the bestfit models computed with the PHOEBE code (PHysics Of Eclipsing BinariEs, Prsa & Zwitter 2005) for both primary and secondary components. Besides Keplerian motion, the models also consider the RossiterMcLaughlin (RM) effect.
Radial velocities of CoRoT 105906206.
Fig. 3 Phasefolded radial velocities of CoRoT 105906206 (top panel) and residuals of the bestfit models (bottom panel). Filled circles and triangles are FEROS and Sandiford measurements, respectively. Uncertainties are shown in light gray. The best Keplerian plus RM models, obtained with PHOEBE, are shown as continuous and dashed lines for primary and secondary components, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER 
3.1. Spectral decomposition
The VOversion^{3} of the KOREL program (Hadrava 2004, 2009) was used to decompose the FEROS spectra into the individual stellar components. The method of spectral disentangling was first introduced by Simon & Sturm (1994) and later on reformulated by Hadrava (2004) in the Fourier space.
The quality of the spectral disentangling performed with KOREL strongly depends on the quality of the derived line shifts of the components (radial velocities). To determine these shifts as precisely as possible, we excluded the broad Balmer lines from this step of the analysis. From visual inspection, we could only find one line of the secondary component in the spectra, Mg ii at 5183 Å. A first KOREL solution was computed on a small interval around this wavelength, and then the region was extended to the range 4915 to 5500 Å, also allowing for variable line strengths in the program. Any further extension in wavelength did not improve the accuracy of the results. Because of the low frequency problem typical of Fourier transformbased disentangling programs like KOREL (see, e.g., Hensberge et al. 2008), slight undulations occurred in the computed continua of the decomposed spectra. Therefore, we applied KOREL to overlapping 20 nm wide bins, where we fixed the orbital parameters and time variable line strengths to the values obtained before. Only in the case of broad Balmer lines did we choose wider bins. Each piece of decomposed spectrum, which in total covers a wavelength range from 4410 to 6860 Å, was corrected for slight continuum undulations using spline fits. Finally, all bins were merged using weighting ramps for the overlapping parts.
KOREL delivers the decomposed spectra of the components normalized to the common continuum of both stars. A renormalization to the individual continua of the components can only be done by assuming a value for their flux ratio. Since this value is very low, the line depths of the secondary are very sensitive to the flux ratio. This, in addition to the very low signaltonoise ratio (S/N) of the decomposed secondary spectrum, prevented us from its analysis. In the case of the primary, small deviations from the true flux ratio only cause a secondorder effect.
For the spectral analysis of the primary component, we assumed a flux ratio of 0.07 that was estimated from the lightcurve solution (the ratio between the bolometric luminosities listed in Table 2). We used the ATLAS9 planeparallel and LTE model atmospheres (Kurucz 1993) and calculated synthetic spectra using SPECTRUM, a stellar spectral synthesis code (Gray & Corbally 1994). We convolved the synthetic spectra with a Gaussian profile having a FWHM = 0.11 Å, to account for the spectrograph resolution, and adopted a surface gravity of log g = 3.53 ± 0.01 dex, as derived from the modeling of the eclipsing binary.
Parameters of CoRoT 105906206 from PHOEBE fits of light and radialvelocity curves.
We derived the effective temperature by fitting the wings of the Hα and Hβ Balmer lines, and the iron abundance ([Fe/H]) together with the microturbulence velocity (υ_{micro}) by applying the method described in Blackwell & Shallis (1979) on isolated Fe i and Fe ii lines. The results are T_{eff,1} = 6750 ± 150 K, [Fe/H] = 0.0 ± 0.1 dex, and υ_{micro,1} = 2.5 ± 0.8 km s^{1}. We also measured the projected rotational velocity υsini of the stars i) by fitting the CCF profile of individual FEROS spectra using the rotation profile described in Gray (1976), which was convolved with the instrumental profile; and ii) by fitting the profile of several clean and unblended metal lines. We derived υ_{1}sini = 47.8 ± 0.5 km s^{1} and υ_{2}sini = 19 ± 3 km s^{1} from the CCF peaks for both primary and secondary stars, and υ_{1}sini = 46 ± 2 km s^{1} from the metal lines of the decomposed spectrum of the primary. As a matter of fact, the value of υsini that we derive here is a mix of velocity fields including stellar rotation, macroturbulence, and pulsations. However, given the high rotation rate of these stars, the macroturbulence and the pulsation broadening are secondorder effects.
We also derived the abundance of chemical elements other than iron using the decomposed spectrum of the primary star. However, the continuum undulations produced by the disentangling procedure, though we tried to correct them, may still affect the abundance determination, specially for heavy elements, which have a small number of spectral lines available. Nevertheless, for elements lighter than Fe, the abundances mostly follow the solar values (Asplund et al. 2005).
Fig. 4 Phasefolded light curve (the top of each panel) and residuals of the bestfit (the bottom of each panel) for models a) with gravity darkening and surface albedo coefficients fixed at β = 0.32 and A = 0.60, b) with A_{1}, A_{2}, and β_{1} set as free parameters but without accounting for the Doppler beaming, c) with A_{1}, A_{2}, β_{1}, and B set as free parameters but still keeping the oscillations (see Sect. 4.1) and d) removing the oscillations. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 5 Reduced chisquare between model and data as a function of the eight free parameters of the light curve model computed using the PIKAIA genetic algorithm during the search for the best solution. From left to right, and from top to bottom: secondary effective temperature, orbital inclination angle, surface potentials, primary gravity darkening, surface albedos, and beaming factor. 

Open with DEXTER 
4. Light and radialvelocity curve analysis
The binary model for both light and radialvelocity curve of CoRoT 105906206 were computed with PHOEBE, a tool for eclipsing binary modeling based on the WilsonDevinney code (Wilson & Devinney 1971). The search for the best model was performed with the PIKAIA subroutine (Charbonneau 2002), a geneticalgorithm based approach. PIKAIA maximizes a usersupplied function (=1/χ^{2}) by minimizing the chisquare χ^{2} between model and data. It starts with a socalled “population”, formed by a given number of “individuals” which, in turn, are formed by sets of parameters randomly selected within a given range of the parameter space. These sets of parameters are encoded as strings to form a “chromosomelike” structure and represent the first trial solutions. The initial solutions (or “parents”) then evolve through subsequent “generations” of possible solutions (the “offsprings”), following rules similar to typical processes of the biological evolution (breeding, crossover, mutation). In equivalence to the natural selection, only solutions that provide low values of χ^{2} are passed to the next generations, and the final solution is achieved after some condition is satisfied.
Our supplied function evaluates the χ^{2} between the observed light curve and the models computed for a set of free parameters that characterize the orbital and physical properties of a binary system. Following the same procedure as described in Maceroni et al. (2014), we implemented this function in a FORTRANbased routine, FITBINARY, which makes use of WilsonDevinney routines to compute the binary models. In our FITBINARY code we adopt the PIKAIA 1.2 new version, an improvement of PIKAIA 1.0 that includes additional genetic operators and algorithm strategies. In particular, the new version allows several mutation modes, such as a fixed or an adjustable mutation rate based either on fitness (the value of 1/χ^{2} comparing best and median individuals) or on distance (the metric distance between best and median population clustering). We normally adopted an initial population with 100 individuals evolving through 200 generations, a mutation mode of onepoint+creep and adjustable rate based on fitness, and a full generation replacement with elitism. The other control parameters were normally kept fixed at their default values (see the related documentation in the PIKAIA Homepage^{4}).
In the prewhitening process, described in detail in Sect. 4.2, (i) we first remove an initial binary model from the processed light curve (the one resulting from the cleaning steps of Sect. 2); then (ii) we identify the significant frequencies in the amplitude spectrum of the time series with oscillations only; (iii) we subtract the frequencies from the processed light curve; and finally (iv) we search for an improved solution for the binary model applied to the light curve with the eclipses alone. These steps are repeated until there is no improvement in the last solution. However, by using this procedure to treat the whole data set (of about 144 days), we did not find any satisfying solution, and the remaining residuals still had clearly visible oscillations. This does not happen if we apply the same procedure to a segment of light curve, since the residuals in this case are at least 2.5 times smaller. We therefore divided the light curve into 8 segments of about 20 days each and applied the procedure of prewhitening to each one separately. In the following sections we present the results obtained using the first segment of the light curve, and at the end of the paper we comment on the comparison with what we obtain using the other segments.
Fig. 6 Distributions of the parameters resulted from our Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. The histograms are normalized to unit and contain 40 000 accepted solutions each. The median of each distribution and the limits enclosing 68% of the results (with equal probability in both sides) are indicated by the dashed lines, and represent the values listed in Table 2. The solid lines indicate the solution that minimizes χ^{2}. 

Open with DEXTER 
4.1. Preliminary solutions
First, using PHOEBE and the radialvelocity data alone, we searched for a good solution to the orbital model by changing the orbital period P, the semimajor axis a, the secondarytoprimary mass ratio q, and the barycentric velocity υ_{γ}. Then, keeping fixed the derived values (except P), we improved the orbital period and, with PIKAIA, we searched for a solution that best fits the light curve data by changing the secondary effective temperature T_{eff,2}, the orbital inclination angle i, and the surface potentials Ω_{1} and Ω_{2}. The eccentricity e and the longitude of periastron ω_{0} were kept fixed at zero, and the primary effective temperature T_{eff,1} was set to 6800 K (according to our estimate performed in Sect. 3). The ratio between orbital and rotation periods was fixed to f = 1.0 for both companions. Later on, with our estimate of the projected rotation velocity from the CCF peaks (see Sect. 3.1), we derived P_{rot,1} = 4.44 ± 0.07 days and P_{rot,2} = days (assuming coplanarity between equatorial and orbital planes, as discussed in Sect. 7), which yielded f_{1} = 0.83 ± 0.01 and . However, these new values did not significantly affect the results already found for the parameters.
Concerning the limb darkening, we adopted a squareroot law with two coefficients, x_{LD} and y_{LD}, for each component and these coefficients also depend on the passband intensities. For a given set of photospheric parameters, PHOEBE interpolates the limb darkening coefficient tables computed for CoRoT passbands (see Maceroni et al. 2009). For both stars, the bolometric luminosity L, mass M, radius R, and surface gravity log g were computed rather than adjusted, where R represents the radius of a sphere with the same volume as the modeled star.
This first preliminary solution model for a detached binary, which is shown in Fig. 4a, is based on the cleaned light curve described in Sect. 2, including the pulsations and other kinds of periodic patterns. The curve was binned using an average of 1000 points in both time and flux in the phasefolded space. The gravity darkening and surface albedo coefficients were kept fixed at β = 0.32 and A = 0.60 for purely convective envelopes (Lucy 1967), by adopting .
Claret (1999) computed the gravity darkening as a function of mass and degree of evolution of the star, which resulted in a smooth transition between convective and radiative energy transport mechanisms. Therefore, in a second step, the gravity darkening (except β_{2}) and surface albedos were set as free parameters as an attempt to improve the fit (see Fig. 4b). Since the primary luminosity dominates the observed flux, the models are independent of the secondary gravity darkening, and therefore β_{2} was kept fixed (see Table 2).
As can be seen in Fig. 4b, and more clearly in the residuals plot, there is a modulation pattern, commonly referred to as the O’Connell effect (O’Connell 1951), in which the flux maximum after the deeper eclipse is greater than the maximum after the shallower eclipse (see also Milone 1968; Davidge & Milone 1984). Some attempted explanations for this asymmetric modulation are the presence of spots on the surface of a chromosphericaly active star, circumstellar clouds of gas and dust, or a hot spot created by mass transfer. Given the physical configuration of this system, however, both stars are nearly spherical (see Sect. 5), so the scenario of mass transfer can be safely excluded from the list of possible causes of the O’Connell effect. Another possible explanation is instead the socalled Doppler beaming, in which the orbital movement of the star modifies its apparent luminosity by beaming the emission of photons in the direction of the observer. The relation (adapted from Loeb & Gaudi 2003) between emitted (F_{0,λ}) and observed (F_{λ}) flux is (1)where B is the beaming factor (see also Zucker et al. 2007; Bloemen et al. 2011), which depends on the wavelength of the observations and on the physical characteristics of the star. In a binary system, since the stars move in opposite directions with respect to the observer, the net beaming effect represents the difference in flux between the components. Therefore, there is no modulation caused by the Doppler beaming if the binary components have the same mass and the same spectral type. To account for and remove this modulation pattern from the observed light curve, we searched for a binary model in which the emitted flux is transformed according to Eq. (1), and the beaming factor is set as a free parameter (see Fig. 4c and Table 2).
4.2. Final solution, uniqueness, and uncertainties
The plots in Figs. 4a–c are based on the light curve with the oscillations still present. These include those stemming from stellar pulsations and other sources, such as the orbital period of the CoRoT satellite (103 min) and its harmonics. We use an iterative procedure for the prewhitening. First we find the best fit to the light curve setting the secondary effective temperature, orbital inclination angle, surface potentials, the albedo coefficients of both components, the primary gravity darkening, and the beaming factor as free parameters (Fig. 4c). After that we subtract this model from the observed data so that only oscillations remain.
We then used Period04 (Lenz & Breger 2005), a program developed for the analysis of time series, to compute the Fourier spectrum and to search for the frequency, amplitude, and phase of each sinusoidal component of the signal. To establish the number of components that give a significant contribution to the signal, we applied the commonly used criterion of S/N > 4, i.e., only frequencies having an amplitude four times the local noise are considered. It is worth noting that, in order to avoid spurious frequencies in the amplitude spectrum, small gaps in the time series were filled in with artificial points that follow a polynomial function fitted to adjacent regions of each gap. A noise consistent with the dispersion of the adjacent regions was applied to each point. More details on the pulsation frequencies are described in Sect. 6.
Finally, the significant frequencies (according to the criterion mentioned above) were subtracted from the cleaned light curve leaving only the eclipses and the modulation of the binary. Again, using PIKAIA and PHOEBE, we improved the preliminary values of T_{eff,2}, i, Ω_{1}, Ω_{2}, A_{1}, A_{2}, β_{1}, and B. The procedure was repeated until the χ^{2} value between model and data did not decrease significantly.
We also tried to account for the individual flux contribution of each star to the observed pulsations in and out of eclipse. However, since the primary star is the pulsating component (we get to this conclusion in Sect. 6) and dominates the observed flux, the influence of the secondary component on the observed pulsations is negligible, because smaller than the noise. We were thus unable to see any difference in the pulsations amplitude in and out of eclipse, and the pulsation frequencies found were equally subtracted from the entire light curve.
The minimization algorithms employed by PHOEBE are the commonly used LevenbergMarquandt and Nelder & Mead’s downhill simplex, both of which are nonlinear optimization methods affected by the problem of remaining stuck at local minima. In the PIKAIA genetic algorithm, mutation and crossover allow the population to move away from local solutions. Figure 5 plots the reduced chisquare (where ν = N − n − 1 is the number of degrees of freedom for N observation points and n fitted parameters) as a function of the free parameters of the light curve model, for a wide range of the parameter space. PIKAIA tries several local solutions (pattern of points vertically assembled) and progressively moves towards the global minimum. In any case, we preferred to carry out more than one iteration, and also around a narrower range of the parameter space, to better constrain the solutions that provide the minimum χ^{2}.
To estimate the uncertainties in the parameters we performed Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations using the Metropolis algorithm (see, e.g., Gelman et al. 2003; Ford 2005). This method is based on a Bayesian inference in the sense that the posterior (or desired) probability distribution p(xd) of a set of parameters x given the observed data d is proportional to the product of a prior knowledge of the probability distribution of the parameters p(x) and a factor exp[−χ^{2}(x)/2], which depends on the χ^{2} goodness of the fit adopting the model x. For the prior probability function, we adopted a Gaussian distribution, centered on an initial set of x and having initial arbitrary variances. The idea is to construct a parameter space that approximates the desired probability distribution. To do so, we generated a chain (or sequence) formed by sets of random parameters that are sampled according to the prior probability distributions. If a set of parameters x^{′} yields a χ^{2} that is smaller than the previous one, then the new solution is accepted. Otherwise, this new solution is accepted with probability exp[−[χ^{2}(x^{′}) − χ^{2}(x)/2]].
The acceptance rate can be adjusted by multiplying the initial variances by a scaling factor, in order to optimize the number of accepted solutions. We redefine this scaling factor every 100 steps of the simulations to achieve a ratio of about 0.25 between the accepted and the total number of generated solutions, which is an optimal value for a multidimensional space (see Gelman et al. 2003). During a first phase of tests, which is called the burnin phase, the variances of the prior distributions are constantly updated (they are computed from the posterior distributions themselves). The uncertainty on the data is also adjusted to ensure that the value of minimum χ^{2} is equal to the number of degrees of freedom. The burnin solution is then discarded and a new simulation begins. After reaching a certain number of accepted solutions, the posterior probability distributions become stable and the chain converges toward the desired distribution.
Fig. 7 Evolution of the radius of the system components in the mass range M_{1,2} ± 2σ(M_{1,2}) (shaded regions, from Table 2) for three values of chemical composition. The darker regions represent the intersection with R_{1,2} ± 2σ(R_{1,2}) (horizontal lines, also from Table 2). The vertical lines indicate the limits in age according to the constraint of coevality of the two stars. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 8 Amplitude spectrum of CoRoT 105906206 after subtracting the final binary model. The vertical dashed lines represent multiples of the orbital frequency (F_{orb} = 0.270667 d^{1}). 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 6 plots the distributions of the eight free parameters that we used to model the light curve of CoRoT 105906206. We discarded the first 15% of the accepted solutions, and the histograms contains 40 000 points each. The parameters of the bestfit solution and their uncertainties are listed in Table 2. They represent the median values and the 68% confidence limits shown in the figure, and are in very good agreement with the best solution found with PIKAIA. It is worth noting that, since T_{eff,2} is correlated with T_{eff,1} (because of the degeneracy between the effective temperatures and the passband luminosities), the uncertainty estimated for the secondary temperature also accounts for the one estimated for the primary star. The final light curve model is shown in Fig. 4d.
First 50 pulsation frequencies, amplitudes, and phases derived for CoRoT 105906206 after subtracting the final binary model.
5. Physical properties of CoRoT 105906206
Besides the parameters that come directly from the fits of the light and radialvelocity curves, the masses (M_{1} and M_{2}), radii (R_{1} and R_{2}), and surface gravities (log g_{1} and log g_{1}) of the two stars are also calculated. Using the values of radius and effective temperature, we can calculate the luminosities (L_{2} and L_{1}). All these parameters, together with the limb darkening coefficients (x_{LD,1}, x_{LD,2}, y_{LD,1}, y_{LD,2}), are listed in Table 2. The resulting model is for a detached binary, whose components are both nearly spherical. For the primary, the radius in the direction toward the secondary is about 4% larger than the radius in the direction of the stellar pole. For the secondary this value is only about 0.3%. This shows that even the primary star is far from reaching the Roche lobe.
To estimate the age of the system, we used the YonseiYale (Y^{2}) evolutionary tracks (Yi et al. 2003), interpolated in mass and chemical composition and drawn on the radius vs. age diagram. This kind of diagram allows us to see the evolution of the stellar radius with time. It is preferred over using the placing of the stars in the HR diagram because, in eclipsing binary systems, we have a precise determination of mass and radius of the components. We checked the effective temperatures of each star that come from the evolutionary models, and they are consistent with those derived from our spectral and light curve analyses.
Figure 7 shows the radius vs. age diagrams for three values of metallicity in the range [Fe/H] ± 2 σ ([Fe/H]), from Sect. 3.1, plotted for masses and radii in the range M_{1,2} ± 2σ(M_{1,2}) and R_{1,2} ± 2σ(R_{1,2}), both from Table 2. Applying the constraint of coevality of the two stars, we found the age of this binary system to be Myr. These are 1σ uncertainties, though, for clarity in the figure, the diagrams were constructed within two standard deviations in metallicity, mass, and radius. The sharp vertical drops correspond to the second gravitational contraction at the end of mainsequence stars. To compute the evolutionary tracks, an overshoot parameter α_{OV} = 0.2 H_{P} (units of the pressure scale height) is adopted when a convective core develops (see Yi et al. 2003, and references therein).
6. Pulsation properties
Figure 8 shows the amplitude spectrum of CoRoT 105906206, computed using Period04 after subtracting the final binary model from the light curve. We searched for significant peaks up to the Nyquist frequency, but none was found beyond 25 d^{1}. A total of 220 frequencies with S/N > 4 was identified, and Table 3 lists the first 50, together with the amplitudes and phases, and the respective formal errors computed according to Montgomery & O’Donoghue (1999). We also searched for possible frequency combinations, including the orbital frequency (F_{orb} = 0.270667 d^{1}). The most evident are listed in the last column of this table. We identified a few combinations that involve the orbital frequency and the most dominant peaks F_{1}, F_{2}, F_{3}, and F_{5}, which seem to be genuine pmode frequencies. A few overtones of the orbital period are still present in Fig. 8, and are also indicated in Table 3. They are probably residuals of the prewhitening process, but have small amplitudes.
The typical properties of δ Sct type variables in terms of effective temperature, luminosity, mass, evolutionary stage, and pulsation frequency range are all present in the primary component of CoRoT 105906206, as one can see in Table 2 and in the list of dominant frequencies in Table 3. As an rough estimate of the frequency range of the pulsations, we applied the relation between the frequency of a given radial mode F_{puls}, the stellar mean density , and the pulsation constant Q: (2)From the fundamental to the fifth radial mode, we have 0.033 ≲ Q ≲ 0.013 (Stellingwerf 1979), which yields 5.2 ≲ F_{puls} ≲ 13.2 d^{1} if we use the values of mass and radius of the primary star, a range that contains the most significant frequencies seen in Fig. 8. The same computation for the secondary star yields frequencies in the range 22 ≲ F_{puls} ≲ 56 d^{1}, which are not observed in the amplitude spectrum. This confirms that the identified pulsation modes belong the primary component.
From the theoretical point of view, a nonadiabatic analysis of an equilibrium model with the physical properties of the primary component, performed with the nonadiabatic oscillation code MAD (Dupret et al. 2005), provides excited modes with frequencies in the typical domain of δ Sct type stars, namely: from 5.2 to 17.0 d^{1} in the fundamental mode (ℓ = 0), from 4.0 to 16.6 d^{1} in the ℓ = 1 mode, and from 4.2 to 16.7 d^{1} in the ℓ = 2 mode, which are in line with the observed range of pulsation frequencies.
7. Final remarks and conclusions
The study of CoRoT 105906206 unveiled an eclipsing binary system in which the primary component pulsates in the range of frequencies typical δ Sct type variables, a result that agrees with the derived values of effective temperature, luminosity, mass, and stage of evolution. Moreover, from the theoretical point of view, a nonadiabatic analysis of a model matching the physical properties of the primary star gives excited frequencies of the most relevant modes (ℓ = 0, 1, and 2) in the same frequency range of the observed pulsations.
By allowing the surface albedos and gravity darkening to vary as free parameters, we improved the solution for the binary model in comparison with the model found by keeping them fixed. In particular, our estimate of β_{1} agrees with the calculations of Claret (1999) for the gravity darkening as a function of the effective temperature for a 2 M_{⊙} star.
An interesting characteristic of this system is the presence of the O’Connell effect, an asymmetric photometric modulation pattern that we interpreted as due to the Doppler beaming of the emitted flux. We quantified this effect by means of the beaming factor B, whose value depends on the passband of the photometric observations and on the physical properties of the stars. Using equations from Mazeh & Faigler (2010), our Eq. (1), and some of the parameters in Table 2, we obtain B = 2.00 ± 0.05, which is in fair agreement with the beaming factor derived from the light curve model (see Table 2). The α_{beam} factor used in those equations was set to unity. This factor accounts for the effect of the stellar light being shifted out or into the observed passband. According to Faigler & Mazeh (2011), the value of α_{beam} may range from 0.8 to 1.2 for F, G, and K stars observed with the CoRoT passband. The same beaming factor listed in Table 2 is obtained setting α_{beam} = 0.8.
That the primary star rotates with a subsynchronous velocity may generate some doubt about our determination of the rotation period, and motivated us to provide some tentative explanations. A spinorbit misalignment, for example, would lead to overestimating P_{rot,1}. However, using Eq. (22) of Hut (1981) applied to the parameters derived for this system and assuming that the primary component rotates as a rigid body, we can estimate the ratio of orbital to rotational angular momentum to be α ∼ 30. In Fig. 4 of that paper, for this value of α, the time scale for circularization is much longer than the time for alignment. Therefore, if e = 0, which is the case of our system, no misalignment is expected. Another explanation could be the loss of angular momentum due to mass transfer. However, the system components are both nearly spherical and far from filling the Roche lobe. The most plausible explanation seems to be the radius expansion of the primary component related to its stage of evolution. This star is passing through a region on the HR diagram of roughly constant luminosity, decrease in effective temperature, and increase in radius. According to the grid of stellar models with rotation of Ekström et al. (2012), a star of about 2 M_{⊙} that has just evolved off the main sequence will pass through a phase of decreasing equatorial velocity before reaching the base of the giant branch (see their Fig. 9). Though these models were computed for single stars, and not specifically for a star with the same parameters as the primary component of our system, they give us an indication that a decrease in the rotation rate is possibly taking place.
The division of the light curve into 8 segments of about 20 days each was needed to identify the bona fide pulsation frequencies. A shift in the frequency phases with time seems to disturb the identification of frequencies in the whole time series. We performed several tests for phase shifts in the pulsation frequencies and for identifying any periodical variation. However, even if phase shifts are indeed present, no clear periodical variation was found. We are not able to explain the origin of this variation, though we think that it is likely intrinsic to the star. The data reduction process and an instrumentrelated effect could be the cause, but we have applied the same method to several other light curves of both CoRoT and Kepler systems, and we have not seen the same behavior before.
We derived our results based on the first of the eight segments. We tested the others by proceeding with the prewhitening steps, which led to new solutions for the binary models, and to identifying pulsation frequencies in each segment. A comparison of the fitted parameters shows very good agreement and low dispersion among the segments. The mean values are ⟨T_{eff,2}⟩ = 6162 ± 13 K, ⟨ i ⟩ = 81.66 ± 0.15^{◦}, ⟨ Ω_{1} ⟩ = 4.27 ± 0.02, ⟨ Ω_{2} ⟩ = 7.89 ± 0.05, ⟨ β_{1} ⟩ = 0.52 ± 0.02, ⟨ A_{1} ⟩ = 0.77 ± 0.11, ⟨ A_{2} ⟩ = 0.06 ± 0.08, and ⟨ B ⟩ = 1.48 ± 0.04. The dispersions are of the order of or smaller than the estimated uncertainties, and the values agree with those in Table 2. Regarding the analysis of the pulsation frequencies, the peaks with higher amplitudes in Fig. 8 (> 1 × 10^{3}) were normally identified in all the eight segments of the light curve, in particular the four genuine pmodes (F_{1}, F_{2}, F_{3}, and F_{5}) listed in Table 3. Small shifts in amplitude, probably related to the phase shifts, were also observed among the segments.
We believe it would be useful to have more spectra collected during the eclipses in order to allow modeling the RossiterMcLaughlin effect. This would confirm whether the spinorbit axes are indeed aligned, as we suspect, and reinforce the possibility of radius expansion of the primary star owing to its stage of evolution. The gathering of more spectra, with higher S/N, would also improve the precision achieved in the spectroscopic analysis, yielding an accurate abundance determination of elements other than iron. We also believe that the behavior of the amplitude and phase variations is still not well understood. The development of more robust programs and methods for analyzing of time series is required to properly deal with this kind of data, in which a large number of observation points and pulsation frequencies are present.
Acknowledgments
We thank Josefina Montalbán and MarcAntoine Dupret for the nonadiabatic calculation of the excited pulsation frequencies. We are also very grateful for the referee report to this work, which contributed a lot to improving our manuscript. This research made use of the ExoDat Database, operated at LAMOAMP, Marseille, France, on behalf of the CoRoT/Exoplanet program, and was accomplished with the help of the VOKOREL cloud service, developed at the Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic in the framework of the Czech Virtual Observatory (CZVO) by P. Skoda and L. Mrkva using the Fourier disentangling code KOREL by P. Hadrava. We acknowledge the generous financial support by the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) under Decree No. 28/2011 Analysis and Interpretation of CoRoT and Kepler data of single and binary stars of asteroseismological interest. D.G. has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/20072013) under grant N. 267251 (AstroFit). A.P.H. acknowledges the support of DLR grant 50 OW 0204. D.G. thanks John Kuehne and David Doss from McDonald Observatory, and Ivo Saviane from ESO for their excellent support during the observations.
References
 Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 2005, in Cosmic Abundance as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, eds. T. G. Barnes, III, & F. N. Bash, ASP Conf. Ser., 336, 25 [Google Scholar]
 Auvergne, M.,Bodin, P.,Boisnard, L., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 401 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Baglin, A.,Auvergne, M.,Boisnard, L., et al. 2006, 36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Meeting abstrat from CDROM, 36, 3749 [Google Scholar]
 Blackwell, D. E., &Shallis, M. J. 1979, MNRAS, 186, 673 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Bloemen, S.,Marsh, T. R.,Østensen, R. H., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 1787 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Buzasi, D. L.,Bruntt, H.,Bedding, T. R., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 1072 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Claret, A. 1999, ASP Conf. Ser., 173, 277 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Charbonneau, P. 2002, Pikaia genetic algorithms, version 1.2 [Google Scholar]
 Davidge, T. J., &Milone, E. F. 1984, ApJS, 55, 571 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Deleuil, M.,Meunier, J. C.,Moutou, C., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 649 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dupret, M.A.,Grigahcène, A.,Garrido, R., et al. 2005, A&A, 361, 476 [Google Scholar]
 Ekström, S.,Georgy, C.,Eggenberger, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A146 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Faigler, S., &Mazeh, T. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3921 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ford, E. B. 2005, AJ, 129, 1706 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. 2003, in Bayesian Data Analysis (London: Chapman & Hall) [Google Scholar]
 Gray, D. F. 1976, in The observation and analysis of stellar photospheres, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
 Gray, R. O., &Corbally, C. J. 1994, AJ, 107, 742 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gruberbauer, M. 2008, n2XX – CoRoT n2 data eXplorer/eXtractor – Manual V1.2a [Google Scholar]
 Hadrava, P. 2004, Publ. Astron. Inst. Acad. Sci. Czech Rep., 92, 15 [Google Scholar]
 Hadrava, P. 2009 [arXiv:0909.0172] [Google Scholar]
 Hensberge, H.,Ilijić, S., &Torres, K. B. V. 2008, A&A, 482, 1031 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Hut, P. 1981, A&A, 99, 126 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Kaufer, A.,Stahl, O.,Tubbesing, S., et al. 1999, The Messenger, 95, 8 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Kurucz, R. 1993, CDROM No. 13, ATLAS 9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km s^{1} Grid (Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory) [Google Scholar]
 Lenz, P., &Breger, M. 2005, Comm. Asteroseismol., 146, 53 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Loeb, A., &Gaudi, B. S. 2003, ApJ, 588, L117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lucy, L. B. 1967, Zeitschrift für Astrophysik, 65, 89 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Maceroni, C.,Montalbán, J.,Michel, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 1375 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Maceroni, C.,Lehmann, H., da Silva, R., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A59 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Mazeh, T., &Faigler, S. 2010, A&A, 521, L59 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 McCarthy, J. K.,Sandiford, B. A.,Boyd, D., &Booth, J. 1993, PASP, 105, 881 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Milone, E. E. 1968, AJ, 73, 708 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Montgomery, M. H., & O’Donoghue, D. 1999, DSSN, 13, 28 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Nidever, D. L.,Marcy, G. W.,Butler, R. P.,Fischer, D. A., &Vogt, S. S. 2002, ApJS, 141, 503 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 O’Connell, D. J. K. 1951, Publ. Riverview College Obs., 2, 85 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Prša, A., &Zwitter, T. 2005, ApJ, 628, 426 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rodríguez, E., &Breger, M. 2001, A&A, 366, 178 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Simon, K. P., &Sturm, E. 1994, A&A, 281, 286 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Stellingwerf, R. F. 1979, ApJ, 227, 935 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Udry, S.,Mayor, M., &Queloz, D. 1999, ASP Conf. Ser., 185, 367 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Uytterhoeven, K.,Moya, A.,Grigahcène, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Wilson, R. E., &Devinney, E. J. 1971, ApJ, 166, 605 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Yi, S. K.,Kim, Y.C., &Demarque, P. 2003, ApJS, 144, 259 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zucker, S.,Mazeh, T., &Alexander, T. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1326 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
All Tables
Parameters of CoRoT 105906206 from PHOEBE fits of light and radialvelocity curves.
First 50 pulsation frequencies, amplitudes, and phases derived for CoRoT 105906206 after subtracting the final binary model.
All Figures
Fig. 1 Portion of the CoRoT 105906206 white light curve normalized to the mean value. The full data extends over 144 days. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 2 Example of crosscorrelation used to derive the radial velocities of the CoRoT 105906206 components. Top panel: a portion of FEROS spectra showing the regions used (delimited by horizontal bars). Bottom panel: crosscorrelation peaks of the primary (1) and secondary (2) stars (dots) fitted by a doubleGaussian function (solid line). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 3 Phasefolded radial velocities of CoRoT 105906206 (top panel) and residuals of the bestfit models (bottom panel). Filled circles and triangles are FEROS and Sandiford measurements, respectively. Uncertainties are shown in light gray. The best Keplerian plus RM models, obtained with PHOEBE, are shown as continuous and dashed lines for primary and secondary components, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 4 Phasefolded light curve (the top of each panel) and residuals of the bestfit (the bottom of each panel) for models a) with gravity darkening and surface albedo coefficients fixed at β = 0.32 and A = 0.60, b) with A_{1}, A_{2}, and β_{1} set as free parameters but without accounting for the Doppler beaming, c) with A_{1}, A_{2}, β_{1}, and B set as free parameters but still keeping the oscillations (see Sect. 4.1) and d) removing the oscillations. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 5 Reduced chisquare between model and data as a function of the eight free parameters of the light curve model computed using the PIKAIA genetic algorithm during the search for the best solution. From left to right, and from top to bottom: secondary effective temperature, orbital inclination angle, surface potentials, primary gravity darkening, surface albedos, and beaming factor. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 6 Distributions of the parameters resulted from our Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. The histograms are normalized to unit and contain 40 000 accepted solutions each. The median of each distribution and the limits enclosing 68% of the results (with equal probability in both sides) are indicated by the dashed lines, and represent the values listed in Table 2. The solid lines indicate the solution that minimizes χ^{2}. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 7 Evolution of the radius of the system components in the mass range M_{1,2} ± 2σ(M_{1,2}) (shaded regions, from Table 2) for three values of chemical composition. The darker regions represent the intersection with R_{1,2} ± 2σ(R_{1,2}) (horizontal lines, also from Table 2). The vertical lines indicate the limits in age according to the constraint of coevality of the two stars. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 8 Amplitude spectrum of CoRoT 105906206 after subtracting the final binary model. The vertical dashed lines represent multiples of the orbital frequency (F_{orb} = 0.270667 d^{1}). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.