Free Access

Table 2

Teff and log g from previous analyses of G191−B2B.

Teff log g
Reference Method
[K] [cm/s2]

61 900 7.5a Shipman (1979) LTE, pure H, optical colors
56 788 ± 3336 5.95 ± 0.04 Koester et al. (1979) LTE, pure H, optical colors,b
62 250 ± 3520 7.55 ± 0.35 Holberg et al. (1986) LTE, pure H, H i L α line
59 250 ± 2000 7.50 ± 0.10 Kidder (1990) LTE, pure H, H i Hγ and Hδ lines
cited by Holberg et al. (1991)
61 000 8.00a Green et al. (1990) LTE, H+He, extreme ultraviolet (EUV) continuum
61 170 8.00a Finley et al. (1990) LTE, H+He, ultraviolet (UV) continuum
62 250 ± 1000 8.00a Finley et al. (1990) LTE, H+He, H i L α line
62 250 7.55 Vennes et al. (1991) NLTE, H+HeCNSi, UV spectrum
53 500 ± 500 Koester & Finley (1992) LTE, H+Hec, UV continuum
60 500 ± 900 7.50 ± 0.05 Vidal-Madjar et al. (1994) LTE, H+He, H i Balmer lines
57 900 ± 1500 7.50a Dupuis et al. (1995) NLTE, pure H, EUV continuumd
54 000 ± 800 7.50a Dupuis et al. (1995) NLTE, H+CNOFe, EUV continuumd
60 500 ± 1000 7.5 Lanz et al. (1996) LTE, H+HeC, H i Balmer lines
56 000 ± 1000 7.5 Lanz et al. (1996) NLTE, H+HeC, H i Balmer lines
55 200 ± 1000 7.5 Lanz et al. (1996) NLTE, H+HeCFe, H i Balmer lines
64 000 ± 1000 7.64 ± 0.06 Vennes et al. (1996) LTE, pure H, H i Lyman lines
57 900 ± 1500 7.5 Vennes et al. (1996) LTE, pure H, extreme UV (EUV) continuumd
64 100 ± 700 7.69 ± 0.04 Vennes et al. (1996) LTE, H+CNOFe, H i Balmer lines
52 600 ± 800 7.53 ± 0.07 Vennes et al. (1996) LTE, H+CNOFe, H i Lyman lines
54 000 ± 800 7.5 Vennes et al. (1996) LTE, H+CNOFe, EUV continuumd
61 193 ± 241 7.49 ± 0.01 Finley et al. (1997) LTE, H-Ni, H i Balmer lines
59 160 7.36 Barstow et al. (1998) NLTE, pure H, H i Balmer lines
59 190 7.36 Barstow et al. (1998) NLTE, H+He, H i Balmer lines
59 060 7.36 Barstow et al. (1998) NLTE, H+He + heavy-metal poor, H i Balmer lines
53 840 7.38 Barstow et al. (1998) NLTE, H+He + heavy-metal rich, H i Balmer lines
52 920 ± 350 7.36 ± 0.03 Barstow et al. (1998) NLTE, H+He + heavy-metal rich, H i Lyman linese
56 000 7.6 Wolff et al. (1998) LTE + NLTE, H+CNOSiFeNi, EUV continuumd
56 000 7.6 Dreizler & Wolff (1999) NLTE, H+CNOSiFeNi, diffusion model, EUV to optical
54 600 ± 200 7.60 ± 0.02 Barstow et al. (2001) NLTE, H+HeCNOSiFeNi, H i Balmer lines
52 930 ± 3600 7.16 ± 0.2 Barstow et al. (2001) NLTE, H+HeCNOSiFeNi, H i Lyman linesf
53 180 ± 530 7.43 ± 0.04 Barstow et al. (2001) NLTE, H+HeCNOSiFeNi, H i Lyman linese
56 000 7.59 Schuh et al. (2002) NLTE, H+HeCNOSiFeNi, diffusion model, EUV continuumd
54 000 7.5 Holberg et al. (2003) NLTE, metal lines
58 865 ± 706 7.57 ± 0.038 Lajoie & Bergeron (2007) NLTEg, pure H, H i Balmer lines
60 680 ± 15 000 7.57h Lajoie & Bergeron (2007) NLTEg, pure H, H i Lyman linesi
57 414 ± 4700 7.57h Lajoie & Bergeron (2007) NLTEg, pure H, V-normalization method
61 980 ± 514 7.56 ± 0.04 Allende Prieto et al. (2009) NLTE, Hj, H i Balmer lines
60 920 ± 993 7.55 ± 0.05 Gianninas et al. (2011) NLTE, H+CNO, H i Balmer linesk

Notes.

(a)

Assumed log g value.

(b)

The authors note that the results are extrapolated from their model grid.

(c)

Stratified model, hydrogen-layer mass between 6 × 10-15 and 8 × 10-15M.

(d)

Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer (EUVE, http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/euve/euve.html) observations.

(e)

Orbiting and Retrievable Far and Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrometer (ORFEUS, http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/en/4221) and FUSE observations.

(f)

Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope (HUT, http://praxis.pha.jhu.edu/) observations.

(g)

International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) observations.

(h)

Adopted from their optical solution.

(i)

Models described in Liebert et al. (2005).

(j)

The authors note that Teff may be overestimated by ≈6000 K because their pure-H models are inappropriate due to the photospheric metal content.

(k)

New H i Stark line-broadening tables from Tremblay & Bergeron (2009).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.