Table A.1
Mean difference of derived effective temperature, ΔTeff = Teff(ref i) − Teff(this work) and derived optical depth invariant, Δlog Q, for N objects from reference i,i = 1,8 in common with our sample (cf. Table A.2).
ref# | N | ⟨ ΔTeff ⟩ | σ(ΔTeff) | ⟨ Δlog Q ⟩ | σ(Δlog Q) |
|
|||||
1 | 4 | –1.38 | 0.76 | ||
3 | 3 | 1.63 | 1.72 | –0.21 | 0.31 |
4 | 3 | 0.13 | 1.70 | 0.05 | 0.28 |
5 | 3 | –0.57 | 0.59 | 0.11 | 0.28 |
6 | 4 | 1.75 | 1.79 | –0.02 | 0.38 |
7 | 8 | –0.21 | 1.67 | –0.06∗ | 0.31∗ |
8 | 6 | –0.08 | 0.23 |
Notes. ΔTeff in kK, Δlog Q in dex. For ref# 1, we compare the Qres-values, whereas for the rest we compare the Q-values normalized by fv (see Eq. (A.1)). Positive values indicate that the results from the specific work are on average larger than the results derived here. σ is the dispersion of these differences. No values are given for ref# 2 (Kudritzki et al. 1999), since there is only one object in common. ∗ Mean difference and dispersion only for 7 objects, excluding the weak-winded object HD 37468.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.