Issue |
A&A
Volume 522, November 2010
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A3 | |
Number of page(s) | 29 | |
Section | Extragalactic astronomy | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014441 | |
Published online | 26 October 2010 |
Molecular and atomic gas in the Local Group galaxy M 33*,**
1
Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, OASU,
CNRS/INSU,
33271
Floirac,
France
e-mail: gratier@obs.u-bordeaux1.fr
2
IRAM, 300 rue de la piscine, 38406 Saint-Martin d’Hères,
France
3
Instituto Radioastronomia Milimetrica (IRAM),
Av. Divina Pastora 7, Nucleo
Central, 18012
Granada,
Spain
4
Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics, National
Observatory of Athens, I. Metaxa
& V. Pavlou, P. Penteli, 15236
Athens,
Greece
5
Max-Plank-Institut für Radioastronomy (MPIfR),
Auf dem Hügel 69,
53121
Bonn,
Germany
6
INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, LE Fermi, 5,
50125
Firenze,
Italy
7
Leiden Observatory, Leiden University,
PO Box 9513,
2300 RA
Leiden, The
Netherlands
8
Department of Astronomy - LGRT, University of Massachusetts -
Amherst, 710 north Pleasant
Street, Amherst,
MA
01002,
USA
9
Observatorio Astronomico Nacional (OAN) Observatorio de Madrid,
Alfonso XII 3,
28014- Madrid,
Spain
10
Observatoire de Paris, LERMA, CNRS, 61 Av. de l’Observatoire, 75014
Paris,
France
11
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD
21218,
USA
12
Department of Radio and Space Science, Chalmers University of
Technology, Onsala Observatory, 439 94
Onsala,
Sweden
13
CSIRO Astronomy & Space Science, Australia Telescope
National Facility, PO Box 76,
Epping
NSW
1710,
Australia
14
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research,
Landleven 12,
9747 AD
Groningen, The
Netherlands
15
1.Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln,
Zülpicher Str. 77,
50937
Köln,
Germany
16
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Tata Institute
of Fundamental Research, Homi
Bhabha Road, Mumbai
400005,
India
Received:
16
March
2010
Accepted:
11
June
2010
We present high-resolution large-scale observations of the molecular and atomic gas in the Local Group galaxy M 33. The observations were carried out using the HEterodyne Receiver Array (HERA) at the 30 m IRAM telescope in the CO(2–1) line, achieving a resolution of 12″ × 2.6 km s-1, enabling individual giant molecular clouds (GMCs) to be resolved. The observed region is 650 square arcminutes mainly along the major axis and out to a radius of 8.5 kpc, and covers entirely the 2′ × 40′ radial strip observed with the HIFI and PACS Spectrometers as part of the HERM33ES Herschel key program. The achieved sensitivity in main-beam temperature is 20–50 mK at 2.6 km s-1 velocity resolution. The CO(2–1) luminosity of the observed region is 1.7 ± 0.1 × 107 K km s-1 pc2 and is estimated to be 2.8 ± 0.3 × 107 K km s-1 pc2 for the entire galaxy, corresponding to H2 masses of 1.9 × 108 M⊙ and 3.3 × 108 M⊙ respectively (including He), calculated with N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) twice the Galactic value due to the half-solar metallicity of M 33. The H i 21 cm VLA archive observations were reduced, and the mosaic was imaged and cleaned using the multi-scale task in the CASA software package, yielding a series of datacubes with resolutions ranging from 5″ to 25″. The H i mass within a radius of 8.5 kpc is estimated to be 1.4 × 109 M⊙ . The azimuthally averaged CO surface brightness decreases exponentially with a scale length of 1.9 ± 0.1 kpc whereas theatomic gas surface density is constant at ΣHi = 6 ± 2 M⊙ pc-2 deprojected to face-on. For an N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) conversion factor twice that of the Milky Way, the central kiloparsec H2 surface density is ΣH2 = 8.5 ± 0.2 M⊙ pc-2. The star formation rate per unit molecular gas (SF efficiency, the rate of transformation of molecular gas into stars), as traced by the ratio of CO to Hα and FIR brightness, is constant with radius. The SFE, with a N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) factor twice galactic, appears 2–4 times greater than for large spiral galaxies. A morphological comparison of molecular and atomic gas with tracers of star formation is presented showing good agreement between these maps both in terms of peaks and holes. A few exceptions are noted. Several spectra, including those of a molecular cloud situated more than 8 kpc from the galaxy center, are presented.
Key words: galaxies: individual: M 33 / Local Group / galaxies: evolution / galaxies: ISM / ISM: clouds / stars: formation
Figures A.1–A.15 are only available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
FITS files of the IRAM data are only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/522/A3
© ESO, 2010
1. Introduction
The Local Group galaxies span a broad range in mass, luminosity, morphology, and metallicity. Two large spirals (the Milky Way and M 31) are the centers of two galaxy subgroupings, each being surrounded by a large number of dwarf galaxies. In addition, M 31 – the Andromeda Galaxy – has a small spiral companion, M 33 (the Triangulum Galaxy); their separation is approximately 15 degrees, corresponding to 200 kpc (assuming a common distance of 840 kpc, Galleti et al. 2004). Gaseous streams are observed between them, indicating tidal interaction (Putman et al. 2009). M 33 provides a means of observing a galaxy morphologically similar to our own but with a mass only a tenth of the Milky Way and factor two lower metallicity(Rosolowsky & Simon 2008; Magrini et al. 2009). Further evidence of the difference between M 33 and the Milky Way is the large gas fraction and blue stellar colors of the former relative to the latter. M 33 thus represents an environment in which to study the interstellar medium (ISM) and star formation (SF) that cannot be replaced by Galactic observations and where individual GMCs can be resolved to probe their SF activity. It may also be possible to apply what we learn by studying M 33 to the physics of early-universe objects, which share many of the characteristics of M 33.
Adopted parameters for M 33.
In this article we present sensitive and high-resolution mapping observations of the CO J = 2 → 1 transition in M 33 in order to study the morphology and dynamics of the molecular component. The total mapped area covers 650 square arcminutes, mainly along the major axis of the galaxy.
A 2′ × 40′ wide strip along the major axis (see Fig. 1) was observed to a particularly low noise level of 25 mK at 2.6 km s-1 velocity resolution to compare with the sensitive C ii Herschel/HIFI and Herschel/PACS spectroscopy observations which will be obtained as part of the HERM33ES Herschel Key Program (Kramer et al. 2010). While the most sensitive and among the highest resolution, these are not the first maps of M 33 in the CO lines. Engargiola et al. (2003) observed the whole of the inner disk (up to about 5 kpc along the major axis) with the BIMA array at 13″ resolution; Heyer et al. (2004) observed the inner disk and a small major axis strip at 50” resolution with FCRAO; Rosolowsky et al. (2007) combined the BIMA + FCRAO + NRO data to improve the sensitivity and resolution of the previous maps; and Gardan et al. (2007) observed a rectangle at high sensitivity and 15″ resolution extending from NGC 604 to the R25 radius. Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of previous molecular and atomic gas surveys in M 33. This work extends the Gardan et al. (2007) work further north and to the south at higher resolution and sensitivity. Earlier studies of GMCs in M 33 include Wilson et al. (1997) and Rosolowsky et al. (2003) and studies similar to our own of other Local Group galaxies have been made by e.g. Fukui et al. (2008), Israel et al. (2003), Leroy et al. (2006), and Nieten et al. (2006).
As mentioned by Blitz & Rosolowsky (2006) for M 33 and Leroy et al. (2006) for IC 10 and discussed more extensively by Gardan et al. (2007), the star formation Rate (SFR) per unit H2 mass or star formation efficiency (SFE = SFR/M(H2) in yr-1) was found to be up to an order of magnitude higher in these small galaxies than in large spirals. This appears to be the case in distant galaxies as well, given the factor 10 increase in (commoving) SFR density (e.g. Madau et al. 1996; Wilkins et al. 2008). Are there local universe analogs of these distant objects? Is M 33 one of them?
One of the obvious questions is whether the H2 mass has not been underestimated in these subsolar metallicity objects. The articles using the data presented here and as part of the HERM33ES project will attempt to answer that issue clearly.
Metallicities were lower in the past and H2 production is believed to take place on grain surfaces – therefore H i to H2 conversion is expected to be less efficient in low-metallicity systems (Krumholz et al. 2009), and this is indeed observed in many systems (e.g. Leroy et al. 2007). The conversion of H i to H2 in the intermediate redshift systems would have to be much more efficient than today, generating unusually high molecular fractions in these distant galaxies (contrary to expectations) with less stellar gravity, in order to have a similar efficiency in converting H2 to stars.
Here, we present new maps of CO and HI. In this first paper, we restrict ourselves to a study of the radial distribution of the molecular gas and infrared surface brightness, of the molecular and atomic gas surface densities and of the SFE, and to a qualitative comparison between the maps of SFR tracers, i.e. the dust maps, and the gas maps. In addition, we will discuss CO spectra in a few selected regions. A series of articles will follow, focusing on at least (i) cloud populations, life cycle, and mass spectrum; (ii) dynamics of the molecular gas and the role of spiral arms; (iii) diffuse CO emission, after subtracting the clouds identified and; (iv) a more detailed comparison of the SFR – gas surface density relation.
![]() |
Fig. 1 The Local Group galaxy M 33. This color image shows the GALEX FUV data that trace young stars and dust in the disk through attenuation. Overlaid are the observed fields a) using the IRAM 30 m Pico Veleta telescope in the CO(2–1) line (thick white outline) and b) by HIFI/PACS instruments as part of the HERM33ES Herschel Key Program (thin yellow stripe). |
2. Observations and data reduction
Comparison of past survey characteristics.
2.1. IRAM CO(2–1) observations
The observations presented here are a follow-up to the Gardan et al. (2007) mapping of a large part of M 33. All data were taken with the 30 meter telescope run by the Institut de RadioAstronomie Millimétrique1 (IRAM) on Pico Veleta near Granada, Spain. The observations were carried out starting in August 2008 and also include the data taken by Gardan et al. (2007).
The IRAM HERA instrument (HEterodyne arRAy), composed of 9 dual-polarization 1.3 mm receivers (Schuster et al. 2004), was used in On-The-Fly scanning mode. All data are presented in the main beam temperature scale and we have assumed forward and main beam efficiencies of ηfor = 0.90 and ηmb = 0.49 ± 0.04 for the HERA observations, the sensitivity is then 9.6 Jy/K (Schuster et al. 2004). The scanning speed was 3 arcsec per second of time with dumps every second. Both the VESPA backend, at 1.25 MHz resolution, and the WILMA correlator with 2 MHz channel spacing, were used simultaneously. Reference positions were observed roughly every three minutes and these were taken to be holes in the H i column density outside of the M 33 disk with no visible FIR emission. The average beam size over the nine pixels is 11.7″. The array was tilted by 18.5 degrees, obtaining 7.6 arcsec spacing between the individual pixel tracks, and then shifted in position by 3.8 arcsec in order to obtain full sampling. This was first done for scanning parallel to RA, then parallel to Dec, the array was then rotated by 90 degrees and the procedure was repeated. The array rotation is to have different pixels cover the same regions to improve data homogeneity and reduce striping. For the HIFI low noise major axis strip, additional scans along and perpendicular to the strip direction where acquired. The repetition of independent scans over the same areas also randomizes any pointing errors. Thus, if there are pointing uncertainties of 2″, these contribute negligibly to the overall beam size (through a negligible smearing). The part of M 33 presented here comes from the observation of about 5 million spectra.
Reduction was carried out within Gildas2 CLASS and GREG software. The intensity of the CO lines is usually small so that emission is not seen in individual spectra, the baseline removal was therefore implemented using a windowing based on the H i data at 17″ presented in Sect. 2.2. In a first step a linear baseline is fitted and subtracted from each individual spectrum not taking into account channels inside a window computed by finding the first channels at a 3σ level framing the peak channel of H i emission and adding a 40 km s-1 buffer on each side of this. A filtering step is then applied to remove spectra with anomalous noise. The actual noise is computed for each spectrum and compared to the theoretical noise computed from the system temperature, integration time and spectral resolution. The spectra with excess noise attributable to poor baselines are removed; this corresponds to about 10% of the spectra taken. The remaining spectra are then convolved by a Gaussian to obtain a regularly gridded cube of the desired resolution. We then fit and remove a third order polynomial to the spectra corresponding to each of the spatial pixels in the gridded cube this time reducing the velocity buffer described previously to 30 km s-1. With this method we have made CO cubes with spacial resolutions of 12, 15 and 25″ and with velocity resolutions of 2.6 km s-1.
![]() |
Fig. 2 IRAM CO(2–1) integrated intensity map of the galaxy M 33 at a resolution of 12″. This map was made using the VLA H i cube (17″ resolution) as a mask, employing a 10 K cutoff per channel (see Sect. 2.2). As a consequence, areas without HI emission above that level appear white. Grey ellipses are drawn every kpc using orientation parameters listed in Table 1. |
![]() |
Fig. 3 CO noise map of the 12″ cube computed from 30 channels free of M 33 emission, from − 80 to 0 km s-1VLSR. |
We compute the CO(2–1) integrated intensity map using a masking method (Gratier et al. 2010) taking into account H i data, we developed in order to filter out some of the noise present in the observations and increase the sensitivity to low intensity possibly diffuse CO emission. Previous masking methods used masks created from spatially smoothed versions of the original CO data cubes to filter out regions dominated by noise (Adler et al. 1992; Digel et al. 1996; Loinard et al. 1999). We use the 21 cm atomic hydrogen data at 17″ × 17″ × 1.27 km s-1 resolution presented in Sect. 2.2 to achieve the same goal, the underlying hypothesis being that molecular gas is unlikely to be present for low enough values of N(Hi) so the corresponding velocity channels can be discarded when computing the integrated intensity CO map. For each pixel of the H i cube, we create a binary mask keeping only the velocity range for each pixel corresponding to a H i signal value above a defined threshold in the H i signal. The integrated moment map for the CO(2–1) data is then computed summing only velocity channels included in the H i mask. Figure 2 shows the integrated intensity map for the 12″ cube using this method and Fig. 3 corresponding noise map at 12″ computed from 30 channels free of emission from M 33 (from − 80 to 0 km s-1 VLSR). The result is an increased S/N ratio as the channels contributing only noise to the sum are no longer taken into account. The value of the H i signal threshold was chosen at 10 K which corresponds to 1.9σ where σ is the rms noise level in the 17″ H i cube. We tested masking values between 5 and 25 K (0.9 to 4.6σ) and the total CO intensity varied by only a few percent. Significantly above or below these values, CO signal is lost or more noise is included. At the 10 K brightness level, the H i lines are broad and sample several channels to either side of the rotation curve. Comparing with other techniques of looking for CO, we found no evidence of missing CO emission by this technique. As an example, the “Lonely Cloud” (α = 1h34m16ṣ7, δ = + 30°59′3″, J2000) (Gardan et al. 2007) in an interarm region not near an H i maximum is included by this method.
2.2. VLA H i mosaicing
The H i observations are from archival VLA B, C, and D array data taken as part of projects AT206 and AT268 in 1997, 1998 and 2001. At the frequency of the H i line the VLA primary beam is 32′. The mosaic comprises 20 D array pointings on a nearly square grid separated by 16′and 6 B and 6 C pointings in a diamond shape covering the entire star forming disk. The primary beam centers of the B/C and D array mosaic are shown in Fig. 4 overlaid on the Spitzer 70 μm map – the D array data contains more pointings extending further from the center of M 33. Since our goal is compare the distribution and kinematics of the atomic and molecular gas at high resolution, we focus here on the stellar disk where VLA B-, C- and D-array data are available. Data calibration and imaging were carried out using the 2.4 version of the CASA3 software package. The quasar 3C 48 (α = 1h37m41ṣ3, δ = + 33°09′35″) was used as flux, bandpass and phase calibrator (with an adopted flux of 16.04 Jy). The calibration of the visibilities was done through the following tasks. First the correct flux was applied to the calibrator visibility model using setjy, then frequency bandpass and gain calibrations were computed using the bandpass and gaincal tasks.
![]() |
Fig. 4 H i primary beam coverage of M 33 overlaid on the 70 μm Spitzer map. VLA D pointings are in red (solid lines) and B/C ones in yellow (dashed lines). |
![]() |
Fig. 5 VLA HI column density map (in color) of the galaxy M 33 at a resolution of 17″ overlaid with the IRAM CO(2–1) intensity contour at 1 K km s-1. The region observed in CO(2–1) are marked with thin white lines. |
Beam and rms noise properties of the H i 21 cm datacubes.
Comparison of results with previous studies of M 33.
The calibration solutions were finally applied to the entire dataset with the use of the applycal task, continuum emission averaged on channels not including line emission from M 33 was subtracted in the uv-space using the uvcontsub task. Flagging of bad data was done by hand. The imaging was achieved using the multi-scale clean MSCLEAN algorithm described in Cornwell (2008). This method has several advantages over the classical clean algorithms that use point like sources to model the observed emission. By cleaning several scales simultaneously, it is able to efficiently recover extended emission and eliminates problems of flux correction (Jorsater & van Moorsel 1995), negative bowls surrounding regions of extended emission, and the pedestal of low level uncleaned flux in the final residual map. An extensive comparison of multiscale clean and its point source counterpart has been carried out in Rich et al. (2008). A series of four cubes with angular resolutions of 5, 12, 17, and 25 arcseconds and 1.27 km s-1 channel width were computed. The 5″ cube corresponds to the highest resolution achievable with the B array. The other cubes were obtained using Gaussian tapers in the uv-plane of respectively 4900 and 3150 and 1900 meters FWHM. In order to minimize sidelobes over the entire map, a robust weighting scheme Briggs (1995) was applied to the data using a robustness factor of 0.5. The rms noise for the cubes was computed over the channels without emission from M 33 within a galactocentric radius of 8.5 kpc. Table 3 summarizes the beam sizes and noise properties of the different cubes. A zeroth moment map (Fig. 5 with the CO 1 K km s-1 intensity contour superposed) was computed at 17″ resolution by masking out regions of the 17″ cube where emission from the 25″ cube was below 2.75K (1σ). The data presented here will be made available throught the Centre de Données de Strasbourg (CDS).
3. Results
3.1. Gas masses
In this section we present measurements of total integrated flux and derived total molecular and atomic gas masses.
3.1.1. Molecular Gas
The CO(2–1) luminosity measured over our observed area is 1.7 ± 0.1 × 107 K km s-1 pc2. Our CO mapped region covers 28% of the total galaxy area up to 8.5 kpc but 61 ± 2% of the infrared emission (see details in Sect. 3.3). The estimated CO(2–1) luminosity for the whole R25 disk is thus 2.8 ± 0.3 × 107 K km s-1 pc2. The molecular gas mass is computed with the following hypotheses. Given that metallicity is half solar and the gradient in M 33 is weak (12 + log (O/H) = 8.4 − 0.03Rkpc, Rosolowsky & Simon 2008; Magrini et al. 2009), we use a constant “standard” Milky Way factor (Dickman et al. 1986) multiplied by a factor of two N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) = 4 × 1020 cm-2/(K km s-1), implicitly assuming an inverse linear dependence between the conversion factor and metallicity (Wilson 1995) but see Israel (2000). Using the CO(1–0) observations from Rosolowsky et al. (2007) and our CO(2–1) observations we compute a CO(2–1)/C0(1–0) ratio of 0.8 in the central kiloparsec of M 33. Due to the decrease in the excitation temperature with radius we can expect lower values of the line ratio for the outer parts as found by Sawada et al. (2001) for the Milky Way and Braine et al. (1997) for NGC4414. With a linear gradient of the line ratio from 0.8 at the center of the galaxy to 0.5 at 8.5 kpc, and taking into account the measured exponential decrease in the CO emission with radius (see Sect. 3.3) we find an average CO(2–1)/(1–0) line ratio of 0.73 for the whole galaxy. The computed mass includes helium by multiplying by a factor 1.37. The molecular gas mass for the whole galaxy is thus 3.3 × 108 M⊙ .
3.1.2. Atomic gas
The integrated H i flux density over a region corresponding to a galactocentric radius smaller than 8.5 kpc, slightly over the R25 radius for M 33, is 8.4 × 103 Jy km s-1. The atomic gas mass was derived from the H i integrated intensity using a conversion factor 1.8 × 1018 cm-2/(K km s-1) (Rohlfs & Wilson 1996). The total H i mass over the same region is 1.4 × 109 M⊙ . Putman et al. (2009) using the Arecibo telescope find give 1.5 × 109 M⊙ inside a very similar contour which they define as the star forming disk.
3.2. Kinematics
We obtain velocity fields for both datasets by computing the first moment of the emission. In the case of H i, the 17″ data was masked by the 25″ cube with a threshold of 10 K. For the CO data, we computed the first moment of the original non H i masked datacube, masking out emission below 4σ. Both methods are thus completely independent of each other. Fig. 6 shows the CO and H i velocity fields at respectively 12″ and 17″. The excellent agreement between the two velocity fields is a further argument in favor of using the H i masking to obtain CO integrated intensity maps.
3.3. Radial distribution
The radial distribution of properties were derived taking azimuthal averages over elliptical rings with inclinations of i = 56° and position angle PA = 22.5° (measured toward East from north). The quantities are therefore deprojected from the sky plane onto the plane of M 33. The radial step is 500 pc which corresponds to about 2′. The bottom part of Fig. 7 shows the cumulative fractions of the area (solid line) and 70 μm surface brightness (dashed line) in our CO map (black area in the inset) compared to the whole elliptical region of radius less than R (sum of grey and black areas of the inset). For galactocentric distances below 2 kpc our map samples more than 80% of the accessible disk at these radii both in area and 70 μm flux. The whole CO mapped area corresponds to 28% of the area up to 8.5 kpc but more than 60% of the corresponding 70 μm flux, this is explained by the rapid decrease in infrared emission with radius. The corresponding values for 24 and 160 μm are similar to a few percent at each radius. Table 5 summarizes the source and resolution of the ancillary data used.
3.3.1. Surface brightness
The top part of Fig. 7 presents the radial variations in average surface brightness of the CO and infrared data from Spitzer at 24 μm, 70 μm and 160 μm, the solid lines correspond to averages taking into account only our CO mapped area and the dashed lines to the whole elliptical annuli for a given radius. For each tracer, the similarity between these two averages is an indication that the area mapped in CO is representative of the M 33 disk in its entirety. The 4 datasets have similar exponential decreases with radius i.e. Fν(r) ∝ e − r/L with a corresponding scale length L. Table 6 summarizes the scale lengths computed by least square fittingÊ for CO and IR data,and Table 7 scalelength values from surveys presented in Table 2.
3.3.2. Mass surface densities
We compute mass surface densities for atomic and molecular gas and study their radial distribution. For the molecular gas mass, we use the same hypotheses as in Sect. 3.1.1 including a constant CO(2–1)/CO(1–0) factor. Taking a linearly decreasing value of this factor would modify only slightly the radial distribution, raising the most extreme outer points by a factor 1.5 and lowering the inner ones by a factor 1.1, at the price of added uncertainties that cannot be simply estimated. The top panel of Fig. 8 shows the mass surface density of atomic and molecular gas as a function of radius. The atomic gas surface density is constant at an average value of 6 ± 2 M⊙ pc-2, the molecular gas mass surface density follows the same trend as the CO surface brightness presented in Fig. 7. The fraction of molecular to atomic gas in mass is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 8. Given the constant atomic gas surface density, the fraction decreases following the molecular gas density from 1.2 to 0.015 from the center to the outer parts of the stellar disk.
3.3.3. Star formation efficiency
The star formation efficiency is usually defined as the ratio of the star formation rate over the mass of molecular gas available to form stars.
Defined in this
way, the SFE is the inverse of the molecular gas depletion time. Estimates from a
variety of observations (Blitz & Rosolowsky
2006; Kennicutt 1998; Hippelein et al. 2003) give a value of the SFR which
varies from 0.3 to 0.7 M⊙
yr-1 for the
entire disk. A recent study by Verley et al.
(2009) using extinction corrected Hα, FUV, and infrared
tracers gives a value of 0.45 ± 0.1 M⊙
yr-1
for total SFR. This is our adopted value.
Our CO map does not cover the whole disk but covers respectively 63%, 61% and 59% of the IR emission at 24 μm, 70 μm and 160 μm (see bottom panel of Fig. 7) so the SFR is ~0.27 M⊙ yr-1 within the area covered by our CO map. With a N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) value of 4 × 1020 cm-2/(K km s-1) and an average 2–1/1–0 line ratio of 0.73 (see Sect. 3.1.1 for details), the molecular gas mass within the CO map is 1.9 × 108 M⊙ . With these values, the SFE is 1.4 × 10-9 yr-1 or a molecular gas depletion time 7 × 108 yr. An SFE of 1.6 × 10-9 yr-1 is a factor ~3 higher than that found in large spiral galaxies (sample in, Kennicutt 1998; Murgia et al. 2002; Leroy et al. 2008) Earlier studies used lower N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) values and thus obtained even higher SFEs (or shorter H2 depletion times) as is shown in Table 4.
In order to bring the SFE of M 33 to the same level as in large spirals, the N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) factor would have to be about 3 times the value we use whereas previous studies used even smaller values (Wilson & Scoville 1990; Corbelli 2003; Heyer et al. 2004; Engargiola et al. 2003; Rosolowsky et al. 2007; Gardan et al. 2007). Through Virial mass estimates and 13/12CO line ratios, Braine et al. (2010) support a value of about N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) = 4 × 1020 cm-2/(K km s-1) in the disk of M 33, possibly closer to the Galactic value in the inner disk.
Figure 9 presents the radial distributions of the SFE as calculated from the Hα, 24, and 70 μm emission. The units are arbitrary as we are interested in showing the radial trend. The SFR were taken as being directly proportional to the Hα and IR luminosities. Hα and FIR emission tend to show opposite biases – the Hα suffers extinction where the FIR is strong and the FIR is weak where little dust is present but the Hα is unaffected. If one were to compute the SFE taking into account the total gas mass, the SFE would drop dramatically with increasing radius as opposed to the SFE computed using only molecular gas that does not appear to vary with radius. Table 4 summarizes the masses, star formation rates and depletion times for this study and previous surveys of M 33.
Ancillary data used in this paper.
![]() |
Fig. 6 CO (left) and H i (right) velocity fields at respectively 12″ and 17″. The CO velocity field was computed from the original non H i masked cube, both velocity fields are thus independent. The contours on the right correspond to a constant S/N ratio of 10 in the 12″ CO integrated intensity. |
The infrared data scale lengths agree with the values in Tabatabaei et al. (2007a) and Verley et al. (2009), although they are slightly smaller because the IR tracers seem to marginally drop more rapidly in our CO mapped region compared to the whole galaxy. The scale length of CO is higher than the ones of 24 μm and 70 μm and similar to the 160 μm.
![]() |
Fig. 7 (Color online) Top: radial distribution of the CO and IR surface brightness in units of MJy sr-1 for infrared data and K km s-1 for CO. For the dust tracers, the surface brightness is computed both on the region covered by our CO observations (solid line) and on the whole elliptic annuli for each radius (dashed lines), showing that our CO sampled area is representative of the galaxy for each radius. Bottom: cumulative fractions of the area (solid line) and 70 μm surface brightness (dashed line) in the region covered by our CO observations (black area in the lower left diagram) compared to the whole elliptic region of radius less than R (sum of grey and black areas at a given R). |
![]() |
Fig. 8 Top: radial distribution of the H2 and H i mass surface density. Bottom: radial distribution of the molecular to atomic mass fraction. |
![]() |
Fig. 9 Radial distribution of the SFE in arbitrary units, all of the curves are normalized to the central value and shifted by 1 decade along the vertical axis. |
3.4. The ISM and star formation tracers
In this section, we compare the CO emission with tracers of star formation. We present a series of figures (10 to 14) comparing the CO emission, as contours, overlaid on images of the 8, 24 and 70 μm FIR emission as well as the Hα and FUV emission (Blow ups of these 5 figures are available in the online version of this article). The 160 μm image is at lower resolution and brings little morphological information not present in the 70 μm image.
Exponential scale length L in kpc for Spitzer MIPS and CO emission computed over the area mapped in CO.
![]() |
Fig. 10 Galex FUV image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
Comparison with previous surveys of CO emission exponential scale lengths L in kpc.
![]() |
Fig. 11 KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
![]() |
Fig. 12 Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
![]() |
Fig. 13 Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
![]() |
Fig. 14 Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
![]() |
Fig. 15 VLA H i zeroth moment image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Note how the CO emission follows the bright H i and outlines the H i holes. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
![]() |
Fig. 16 Scatter plot between CO integrated intensity and 70 μm emission. |
![]() |
Fig. 17 Spectrum of a bright cloud at position (α = 1h34m09ṣ4, δ = + 30°49′06″, J2000), unlike other strong peak of CO integrated intensity, it lacks strong emission in star formation tracers (see Sect. 3.4). |
![]() |
Fig. 18 Spectra of the outer disk cloud (α = 1h34m50ṣ8, δ = + 31°08′26″, J2000) shown with 6″ spacing between panels. If the secondary peak at –266 km s-1, seen in the second spectrum from the bottom in the middle column, is real then the cloud is small as it is only seen within a single beam. |
![]() |
Fig. 19 Spectra of two more outer disk clouds at different velocities. The lower left panel is at (α = 1h34m21ṣ7, δ = + 31°04′13″, J2000) and the panel spacing is 6″. |
While the dynamic range in the CO image is much lower than in the images of star formation tracers, the correspondence is globally excellent. Figure 16 shows the scatter plot between the CO integrated intensity and 70 μm emission.
Figures 10–14 show that in almost all cases the CO emission is found where star formation is detected and in general the CO emission is stronger as the level of SF increases. The weaker CO contours outline the regions with a remarkable precision (see online Figs. 1 to 12 for the blowups). A partial exception is found near (α = 1h34m09ṣ4, δ = + 30°49′06″, J2000) where the CO emission is extremely strong while the SF tracers show rather weak emission. The CO spectrum in the direction of that particular cloud is shown in Fig. 17.
A true exceptionto the FIR–HI–CO correlation is the interarm cloud at (α = 1h34m16ṣ7, δ = + 30°59′3″, J2000) dubbed “Lonely Cloud” by Gardan et al. (2007). It is found in a region with very little if any star formation and relatively weak H i emission, despite fairly strong CO (and even 13CO) emission. When H i brightness thresholds higher than 10 K are used to create the masked zero-moment CO maps, the Lonely Cloud disappears. While this cloud was discovered in the first set of observations, it remains a unique object as the observations of the central and southern regions, despite considerably lower noise levels than in Gardan et al. (2007), have not revealed similar molecular clouds.
In the outer parts, the FIR emission is typically quite inconspicuous, even where CO has been detected, but the Hα emission is often quite strong. In the central regions, the alignment of the emission at the different wavelengths is nearly perfect, especially between CO and FIR. Further out, however, notable offsets become more common although there is a clear association between the CO and FIR/Hα emitting regions. The offsets are less than 100 pc, particularly in comparison with the FIR.
The CO emission follows HI-defined arm-like structures very closely, completely avoiding the H i holes. As can be seen in Fig. 15 and corresponding blow ups in the online version of the paper, the overall correlation between H i and CO emission is very good. CO is generally found in HI-rich regions although not all of the H i peaks show CO emission and not all CO emission falls on H i. It is not clear what the source of the 70 μm emission is in for example the H i (and CO) hole around (α = 1h34m25, δ = + 30°35′00″, J2000) as the amount of neutral gas is very low. The emission in this region is lower in the 24 and 8 μm wavebands, so perhaps the 70 micron emission appears stronger than in reality due to the poorer spatial resolution. The upcoming Herschel HERM33ES observations should answer this.
3.5. Examples of interesting spectra
The spectra shown in Figs. 17–19 are just a few among a huge number but are intended to show “special” positions. Figure 17 shows a very strong CO profile towards a region without strong star formation (note good agreement with Engargiola et al. 2003). The line is very strong with a line width of about 11 km s-1 at half-intensity. The other spectra shown are interesting because the CO lines are detected very far from the center of M 33, despite the low-metallicity and surface mass density. Figure 18 shows the second molecular cloud detected at or beyond R25 in M 33. A secondary peak offset in velocity by about 8 km s-1 may be present. Figure 19 shows further spectra near R25 which clearly is composed of emission from two clouds, the cloud to the SE (of the figure) at –260 km s-1 and the one to the NW at about –273 km s-1. The spectral resolution of the data is barely sufficient to measure the linewidths of the clouds, which are typically less than 5 km s-1 at half power. This was also true of the spectra of distant clouds shown in Braine et al. (2010) – they are much narrower than in the H2-rich inner disk. It is not clear whether the broad linewidths in the inner disk are because the GMCs themselves are much more massive or due to a superposition of clouds (or a single GMC in a region with significant diffuse emission).
The spectra shown also illustrate the dynamic range of the data acquired, roughly 100 in integrated intensity.
4. Conclusions
This work presents high-resolution maps of the atomic and molecular gas in the disk of M 33 via observations of the H i 21 cm and CO(2–1) lines. The whole disk out to 8.5 kpc is covered in the H i line and about 60% of the emission in CO.
Assuming the N(H2)/ICO(1 − 0) factor to be twice that of the Galaxy, because of the subsolar metallicity of M 33, we estimate a molecular gas mass of 3.3 × 108 M⊙ roughly 20% of the 1.4 × 109 M⊙ detected in the inner 8.5 kpc in H i. Azimuthally averaging, the H i surface density is close to constant with radius but the H2 decreases exponentially with a scale length of 1.9 kpc. The H2/H i mass ratio decreases from about unity to 1%.
The correspondence between the peaks and holes in the distributions of molecular and atomic gas is excellent and follows the peaks and troughs in the FIR, MIR, and Hα images. The SFE is approximately constant with radius, suggesting that molecular gas is transformed into stars at a similar rate (assuming a similar IMF) at all galactocentric radii. However, the SFE in the small, gas-rich, low-metallicity, blue spiral M 33 appears 2–4 times higher than what is observed in large nearby spirals.
The sensitivity of the survey is such that CO emission is detected far out in the disk of M 33 although few clouds are present and the lines are much weaker in intensity.
Acknowledgments
We thank the IRAM staff in Granada for their help with the observations.
References
- Adler, D. S., Lo, K. Y., Wright, M. C. H., et al. 1992, ApJ, 392, 497 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Blitz, L., & Rosolowsky, E. 2006, ApJ, 650, 933 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Braine, J., Brouillet, N., & Baudry, A. 1997, A&A, 318, 19 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Braine, J., Gratier, P., Kramer, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, A107 [Google Scholar]
- Briggs, D. S. 1995, in BAAS, 27, 1444 [Google Scholar]
- Corbelli, E. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Corbelli, E., & Schneider, S. E. 1997, ApJ, 479, 244 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cornwell, T. J. 2008, IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process., 2, 793 [Google Scholar]
- Deul, E. R., & van der Hulst, J. M. 1987, A&AS, 67, 509 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Dickman, R. L., Snell, R. L., & Schloerb, F. P. 1986, ApJ, 309, 326 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Digel, S. W., Lyder, D. A., Philbrick, A. J., Puche, D., & Thaddeus, P. 1996, ApJ, 458, 561 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Engargiola, G., Plambeck, R. L., Rosolowsky, E., & Blitz, L. 2003, ApJS, 149, 343 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fukui, Y., Kawamura, A., Minamidani, T., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Galleti, S., Bellazzini, M., & Ferraro, F. R. 2004, A&A, 423, 925 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Gardan, E., Braine, J., Schuster, K. F., Brouillet, N., & Sievers, A. 2007, A&A, 473, 91 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Gratier, P., Braine, J., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J., et al. 2010, A&A, 512, A68 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Greenawalt, B. E. 1998, Ph.D. thesis, New Mexico State University [Google Scholar]
- Heyer, M. H., Corbelli, E., Schneider, S. E., & Young, J. S. 2004, ApJ, 602, 723 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hinz, J. L., Rieke, G. H., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 259 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hippelein, H., Haas, M., Tuffs, R. J., et al. 2003, A&A, 407, 137 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Hoopes, C. G., Walterbos, R. A. M., & Bothun, G. D. 2001, ApJ, 559, 878 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Israel, F. 2000, in Molecular Hydrogen in Space, ed. F. Combes, & G. Pineau Des Forets, 293 [Google Scholar]
- Israel, F. P., Baas, F., Rudy, R. J., Skillman, E. D., & Woodward, C. E. 2003, A&A, 397, 87 [Google Scholar]
- Jorsater, S., & van Moorsel, G. A. 1995, AJ, 110, 2037 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kramer, C., Boquien, M. X. M., Buchbender, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F., & Tumlinson, J. 2009, ApJ, 699, 850 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leroy, A., Bolatto, A., Walter, F., & Blitz, L. 2006, ApJ, 643, 825 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leroy, A., Cannon, J., Walter, F., Bolatto, A., & Weiss, A. 2007, ApJ, 663, 990 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2782 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Loinard, L., Dame, T. M., Heyer, M. H., Lequeux, J., & Thaddeus, P. 1999, A&A, 351, 1087 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Madau, P., Ferguson, H. C., Dickinson, M. E., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 1388 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Magrini, L., Stanghellini, L., & Villaver, E. 2009, ApJ, 696, 729 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Murgia, M., Crapsi, A., Moscadelli, L., & Gregorini, L. 2002, A&A, 385, 412 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Nieten, C., Neininger, N., Guélin, M., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 459 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Paturel, G., Petit, C., Prugniel, P., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 7237 [Google Scholar]
- Putman, M. E., Peek, J. E. G., Muratov, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1486 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rich, J. W., de Blok, W. J. G., Cornwell, T. J., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2897 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rohlfs, K., & Wilson, T. L. 1996, Tools of Radio Astronomy (Springer) [Google Scholar]
- Rosolowsky, E., & Simon, J. D. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1213 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rosolowsky, E., Engargiola, G., Plambeck, R., & Blitz, L. 2003, ApJ, 599, 258 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rosolowsky, E., Keto, E., Matsushita, S., & Willner, S. P. 2007, ApJ, 661, 830 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sawada, T., Hasegawa, T., Handa, T., et al. 2001, ApJS, 136, 189 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schuster, K.-F., Boucher, C., Brunswig, W., et al. 2004, A&A, 423, 1171 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Tabatabaei, F. S., Beck, R., Krügel, E., et al. 2007a, A&A, 475, 133 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Tabatabaei, F. S., Krause, M., & Beck, R. 2007b, A&A, 472, 785 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Thilker, D. A., Hoopes, C. G., Bianchi, L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Verley, S., Hunt, L. K., Corbelli, E., & Giovanardi, C. 2007, A&A, 476, 1161 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Verley, S., Corbelli, E., Giovanardi, C., & Hunt, L. K. 2009, A&A, 493, 453 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins, S. M., Trentham, N., & Hopkins, A. M. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 687 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, C. D. 1995, ApJ, 448, L97 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, C. D., & Scoville, N. 1990, ApJ, 363, 435 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, C. D., Walker, C. E., & Thornley, M. D. 1997, ApJ, 483, 210 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Online material: Online figures
![]() |
Fig. A.1 Northern part of KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.2 Center part of KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.3 Southern part of KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.4 Northern part of Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.5 Center part of Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.6 Southern part of Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.7 Northern part of Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.8 Center part of Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.9 Southern part of Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.10 Northern part of Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.11 Center part of Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.12 Southern part of Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.13 Northern part of VLA H i 21 cm integrated intensity image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.14 Center part of VLA H i 21 cm integrated intensity image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
![]() |
Fig. A.15 Southern part of VLA H i 21 cm integrated intensity image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
All Tables
Exponential scale length L in kpc for Spitzer MIPS and CO emission computed over the area mapped in CO.
Comparison with previous surveys of CO emission exponential scale lengths L in kpc.
All Figures
![]() |
Fig. 1 The Local Group galaxy M 33. This color image shows the GALEX FUV data that trace young stars and dust in the disk through attenuation. Overlaid are the observed fields a) using the IRAM 30 m Pico Veleta telescope in the CO(2–1) line (thick white outline) and b) by HIFI/PACS instruments as part of the HERM33ES Herschel Key Program (thin yellow stripe). |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 2 IRAM CO(2–1) integrated intensity map of the galaxy M 33 at a resolution of 12″. This map was made using the VLA H i cube (17″ resolution) as a mask, employing a 10 K cutoff per channel (see Sect. 2.2). As a consequence, areas without HI emission above that level appear white. Grey ellipses are drawn every kpc using orientation parameters listed in Table 1. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 3 CO noise map of the 12″ cube computed from 30 channels free of M 33 emission, from − 80 to 0 km s-1VLSR. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 4 H i primary beam coverage of M 33 overlaid on the 70 μm Spitzer map. VLA D pointings are in red (solid lines) and B/C ones in yellow (dashed lines). |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 5 VLA HI column density map (in color) of the galaxy M 33 at a resolution of 17″ overlaid with the IRAM CO(2–1) intensity contour at 1 K km s-1. The region observed in CO(2–1) are marked with thin white lines. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 6 CO (left) and H i (right) velocity fields at respectively 12″ and 17″. The CO velocity field was computed from the original non H i masked cube, both velocity fields are thus independent. The contours on the right correspond to a constant S/N ratio of 10 in the 12″ CO integrated intensity. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 7 (Color online) Top: radial distribution of the CO and IR surface brightness in units of MJy sr-1 for infrared data and K km s-1 for CO. For the dust tracers, the surface brightness is computed both on the region covered by our CO observations (solid line) and on the whole elliptic annuli for each radius (dashed lines), showing that our CO sampled area is representative of the galaxy for each radius. Bottom: cumulative fractions of the area (solid line) and 70 μm surface brightness (dashed line) in the region covered by our CO observations (black area in the lower left diagram) compared to the whole elliptic region of radius less than R (sum of grey and black areas at a given R). |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 8 Top: radial distribution of the H2 and H i mass surface density. Bottom: radial distribution of the molecular to atomic mass fraction. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 9 Radial distribution of the SFE in arbitrary units, all of the curves are normalized to the central value and shifted by 1 decade along the vertical axis. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 10 Galex FUV image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 11 KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 12 Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 13 Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 14 Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 15 VLA H i zeroth moment image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. Note how the CO emission follows the bright H i and outlines the H i holes. Blow ups are available in the online version. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 16 Scatter plot between CO integrated intensity and 70 μm emission. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 17 Spectrum of a bright cloud at position (α = 1h34m09ṣ4, δ = + 30°49′06″, J2000), unlike other strong peak of CO integrated intensity, it lacks strong emission in star formation tracers (see Sect. 3.4). |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 18 Spectra of the outer disk cloud (α = 1h34m50ṣ8, δ = + 31°08′26″, J2000) shown with 6″ spacing between panels. If the secondary peak at –266 km s-1, seen in the second spectrum from the bottom in the middle column, is real then the cloud is small as it is only seen within a single beam. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 19 Spectra of two more outer disk clouds at different velocities. The lower left panel is at (α = 1h34m21ṣ7, δ = + 31°04′13″, J2000) and the panel spacing is 6″. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.1 Northern part of KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.2 Center part of KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.3 Southern part of KPNO Hα image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.4 Northern part of Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.5 Center part of Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.6 Southern part of Spitzer 8 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.7 Northern part of Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.8 Center part of Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.9 Southern part of Spitzer 24 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.10 Northern part of Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.11 Center part of Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.12 Southern part of Spitzer 70 μm image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (white), 2, 4 (black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.13 Northern part of VLA H i 21 cm integrated intensity image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.14 Center part of VLA H i 21 cm integrated intensity image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. A.15 Southern part of VLA H i 21 cm integrated intensity image with ICO main beam contours of 1 (green), 2 (red), 4(black), 8 (blue) K km s-1. The beam size is shown as a white dot in the lower left corner. |
In the text |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.