Issue |
A&A
Volume 515, June 2010
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A72 | |
Number of page(s) | 18 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913395 | |
Published online | 10 June 2010 |
The first spectral line surveys searching for signals from the dark ages
C. M. Persson 1 - R. Maoli2,3 - P. Encrenaz4 - Å. Hjalmarson1 - M. Olberg1,5 - G. Rydbeck1 - M. Signore4 - U. Frisk6 - Aa. Sandqvist7 - J. Y. Daniel3
1 - Onsala Space Observatory (OSO), Chalmers University of Technology,
439 92 Onsala, Sweden
2 - Department of Physics, University of Rome ``La Sapienza'', Pl. A:
Moro 2, 00185, Roma, Italy
3 - Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 95 bis boulevard Arago, 75014
Paris, France
4 - LERMA, Observatoire de Paris and U.P.M.C., 61, Av. de
l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France
5 - SRON, Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
6 - Swedish Space Corporation, PO Box 4207, 171 04 Solna, Sweden
7 - Stockholm Observatory, AlbaNova University Center, 10691 Stockholm,
Sweden
Received 2 October 2009 / Accepted 8 March 2010
Abstract
Aims. Our aim is to observationally investigate the
cosmic Dark Ages in order to constrain star and structure formation
models, as well as the chemical evolution in the early Universe.
Methods. Spectral lines from atoms and molecules in
primordial perturbations at high redshifts can give information about
the conditions in the early universe before and during the formation of
the first stars in addition to the epoch of reionisation. The lines may
arise from moving primordial perturbations before the formation of the
first stars (resonant scattering lines), or could be thermal absorption
or emission lines at lower redshifts. The difficulties in these
searches are that the source redshift and evolutionary state,
as well as molecular species and transition are unknown, which
implies that an observed line can fall within a wide range of
frequencies. The lines are also expected to be very weak. Observations
from space have the advantages of stability and the lack of atmospheric
features which is important in such observations. We have therefore,
as a first step in our searches, used the Odin satellite to perform two
sets of spectral line surveys towards several positions. The first
survey covered the band 547-578 GHz towards two positions, and
the second one covered the bands 542.0-547.5 GHz and
486.5-492.0 GHz towards six positions selected to test
different sizes of the primordial clouds. Two deep searches centred at
543.250 and 543.100 GHz with 1 GHz bandwidth were
also performed towards one position. The two lowest rotational
transitions of H2 will be redshifted to these
frequencies from
,
which is the predicted epoch of the first star formation.
Results. No lines are detected at an rms level of
14-90 and 5-35 mK for the two surveys, respectively, and
2-7 mK in the deep searches with a channel spacing
of 1-16 MHz. The broad bandwidth covered allows a
wide range of redshifts to be explored for a number of atomic and
molecular species and transitions. From the theoretical side, our
sensitivity analysis show that the largest possible amplitudes of the
resonant lines are about 1 mK at frequencies 200 GHz,
and a few
K
around 500-600 GHz, assuming optically thick lines
and no beam-dilution. However, if existing, thermal absorption
lines have the potential to be orders of magnitude stronger than the
resonant lines. We make a simple estimation of the sizes and masses of
the primordial perturbations at their turn-around epochs, which
previously has been identified as the most favourable epoch for
a detection. This work may be considered as an important pilot
study for our forthcoming observations with the Herschel Space
Observatory.
Key words: cosmology: observations - early Universe - large-scale structure of Universe - line: formation - ISM: molecules - submillimeter: ISM
1 Introduction
One of the important topics in astronomy today concerns the formation
of the first stars and structure formation in the Universe. The cosmic
microwave background radiation observed by NASAs Cosmic Background
Explorer (COBE) satellite and the
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe1 (WMAP)
shows small density fluctuations at a redshift of z
1100
and a temperature of
3000 K. After this
epoch of recombination the Universe became neutral and entered the
cosmic Dark Ages which did not end until the formation of the first
stars and quasars, which are believed to have reionised the Universe at
z
11 (Dunkley
et al. 2009; Komatsu et al. 2009).
During the Dark Ages the transition from the small density fluctuations
left over from the inflation to completely formed objects took place
(e.g. Loeb 2008).
The challenging question is how and by what means we can reveal
this process.
The main method to obtain information about physical and
chemical conditions in star forming regions at low redshift is by means
of atomic and molecular line observations. Molecular observations of
high redshift objects have also been performed, for example by Bertoldi et al. (2003)
who found high excitation CO in a Sloan Digital Sky Survey
quasar at z = 6.4. However,
no observational evidence exists at all from the cosmic Dark
Ages at even higher redshifts before or during the earliest epoch of
the first star formation at predicted
redshifts of 20-30
(e.g. Glover
et al. 2008; Glover 2005).
Model-dependent theoretical analysis and computer simulations have therefore been the main tools to follow perturbations of different scales in the primordial medium to predict when and how the first stars and structure in the Universe evolved. This depends on a number of parameters including the chemistry in the Early Universe and the properties of dark matter. The chemistry constitutes a very important part in the Early Universe since star formation requires a cooling mechanism mainly provided by molecules. Dust grains are very important for molecular production and for instance almost all of the molecular hydrogen production occurs today on the surface of dust grains. The lack of dust and heavy elements in the Early Universe has therefore resulted in very low molecular abundances of only a few species and therefore difficulties to explain the formation of the first stars (e.g. Glover 2005; Bromm & Larson 2004).
The Standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (SBBN) model predicts
the formation of H, D, He and Li
a few minutes after the Big Bang (e.g. Steigman 2007). Their
primordial abundances in this model depend only on the density of
baryons which has been measured with high precision,
=
0.0456
0.0015 (Komatsu
et al. 2009). In the expanding and cooling
Universe, molecular synthesis of for example H2,
H2+, HeH+,
HD, HD+, LiH, and LiH+
could begin as soon as neutral atoms appeared, attaining maximum
abundances around redshifts of 100-400 depending on species
(e.g. Vonlanthen
et al. 2009). The molecular primordial abundances
depend on many parameters and many attempts have been made to follow
the chemical evolution during the Dark Ages with results that often
differ by orders of magnitude (e.g. Signore & Puy 2009;
Bovino
et al. 2009; Galli & Palla 1998,2002;
Black
2006; Sethi et al. 2008;
Puy
& Signore 2007; Puy et al. 1993;
Schleicher
et al. 2008; Lepp et al. 2002;
Lepp
& Shull 1984).
The behaviour of gas in galaxy formation is still an open problem, despite the development of simulations, more precise semi-analytical models and more complete observational data during the recent years. In particular, cooling mechanisms in the primordial medium, star formation and feedback processes are far from being completely understood (Ciardi & Ferrara 2005; Ellis & Silk 2007; Baugh 2006; Okamoto 2008; De Lucia & Poggianti 2008). In order to be able to discriminate between the different models of structure formation it is therefore important to test theory with observations from the Dark Ages.
We do know that during this epoch, the Universe is filled with
cosmic microwave background (CMB)
photons, atoms, molecules, ions and electrons. The question is if these
species have high enough abundances to produce detectable signals.
Since the average density on large scales is predicted to be very low,
0.2 cm-3 at z
100
and decreasing towards lower redshift, collisions are negligible and
excitation is generally believed to be dominated by absorption of
CMB photons followed by spontaneous or stimulated emission in
a process known as resonant scattering. This process alone is not able
to produce a signal since CMB photons are nearly isotropic and
resonant scattering produce an isotropic distribution of photons. The
only effect of resonant scattering by a primordial medium is the
damping of CMB primary anisotropies (Maoli et al. 1994).
However, the gravitational potentials induce peculiar
velocities of the primordial clouds. Thus, the scattered
CMB photons will be isotropically distributed in the reference
frames of the clouds, but not in the CMB reference frame.
As a consequence, secondary resonant scattering
anisotropies will be produced. The cross section for the resonant
scattering is many orders of magnitudes larger than for Thomson
scattering between CMB photons and electrons, but it
is extremely frequency dependent, peaking at the rotational and
rotational-vibrational frequencies of the scattering species. Resonant
lines will therefore be produced by these moving primordial clouds (Maoli et al. 1996).
Since the original idea by Dubrovich (1977), inspired by earlier work on CMB fluctuations by Zeldovich, a number of papers have already analysed the possibility of detecting the resonant lines (e.g. Dubrovich et al. 2008; Maoli et al. 1996,1994) and two previous observational attempts have been made without success (Gosachinskij et al. 2002; de Bernardis et al. 1993).
However, possible signals from the Dark Ages may not only
arise from resonant scattering since
the growing potentials may further induce adiabatic heating as well as
shock heating of collapsing primordial perturbations (e.g. Santoro
& Shull 2006; Johnson & Bromm 2006;
Greif
et al. 2008b; Barkana & Loeb 2001).
This produces thermal emission or absorption from denser than average
or high temperature regions. The first stars are predicted to be very
massive 100
and formed either in isolation or at most as a small stellar multiple
in minihalos (e.g. Bromm et al. 2009;
Abel
et al. 2000; Bromm & Larson 2004).
These hot stars must have emitted enormous amounts of energetic
radiation. By the time of reionisation, large
HII regions are predicted to have grown around clusters of
these hot and bright stars (e.g. Greif
et al. 2008a). This radiation will first destroy the
molecules, but in the cooling ejecta of the primordial supernovae
molecules will later be efficiently produced (Cherchneff & Lilly 2008)
for instance H2 due to the high degree
of ionisation. However, many considerations have to be taken into
account to predict all these types of emission/absorption, hence
leading to uncertain results.
We emphasize that every possibility to obtain observations
from the Dark Ages should be seriously considered. A detection
would be extremely important and would give direct
evidence of a very high redshift protostructure within a wide range of
angular sizes, from arcsecond to arcminute scales, depending on the
cosmological model. These small scales are not observable in the
CMB anisotropies due to the finite depth of the last
scattering surface. The horizon at the last scattering surface
corresponds to 240 Mpc today. The Planck
satellite, launched on May 14, 2009, will measure the
CMB power spectrum for angular scales greater than 10
(40 Mpc).
Smaller scales, at cluster and galaxy sizes are unobservable
due to photon diffusion damping associated with the non-instantaneous
nature of the recombination process at the last scattering surface (Silk 1968).
Any primordial spectral line will also provide a unique test of nuclear synthesis at high redshift, give new information about the reionisation of the universe, probe the chemistry throughout a wide range of redshifts, the heating and cooling processes as well as the dynamics of the primordial clouds before and during the gravitational collapse of a protostructure. Even a non-detection could give very valuable information in order to constrain all these issues if the noise level is low.
Given the expected weakness of the lines and our ignorance of the frequencies at which the transitions will fall, ground-based observations are complicated by the terrestrial atmospheric lines. The ozone molecule, O3, including all the isotopes 16O, 17O and 18O, emits numerous lines. Moreover, most of the vibrationally excited lines can not be found in catalogues. Observations with the IRAM 30-m telescope (de Bernardis et al. 1993) experienced difficulties from these lines at a low level. Interferometer observations are therefore interesting for searches like this, due to the many advantages for rejecting both broad and narrow band atmospheric emissions. Ground based single dish observations can, however, also provide valuable information especially at low frequencies, even though the foreground and atmospheric radiation poses a large problem. Another possibility is observations from space, which have the advantages of stability and lack of atmospheric features.
As a first test, we have therefore chosen to use a satellite to search for and put upper limits on primordial signals from the Dark Ages. The satellite is required to have tunable receivers in order to cover a broad spectral band, essential for the exploration of a wide redshift range. In this work, we have used the only available satellite at the time with the above mentioned requirements: the Odin satellite (Nordh et al. 2003). This satellite has the unique capability to cover a broad spectral band with a high channel spacing of about 1 MHz using tunable single sideband (SSB) receivers. This has allowed us for the first time to search for redshifted molecular hydrogen from the predicted time of the formation of the first stars or earlier.
2 The Odin observations
The main problems in the searches of primordial lines are the unknown but expected weak amplitudes from unknown species in unknown sources at unknown redshifts. This implies that the frequency of the lines can be anywhere in a wide frequency range. Thus we need to cover a large frequency band to probe a wide range of redshifts for many possible species and transitions. The sources should on the other hand be found in every direction on the sky even though they most likely have a clumpy distribution and also are located at different redshifts. This implies that we do not know the evolutionary state, size or density of the perturbations.
2.1 Interesting species
Our approach in all observations has been to perform spectral
line surveys in order to cover a wide redshift range. This is necessary
since our objects are located at an unknown redshift and
the expansion of the Universe causes the frequency of an emitted photon
to be redshifted as
where



We search for any atom or molecule that may be present in the
high redshift Universe. This includes molecules that form from the
primordial elements H, D, He and Li (Steigman 2007)
such as: H2, H2+,
H2D+, HD, HD+,
HeH+, LiH and LiH+.
There are also suggestions that lines from neutral hydrogen H
and helium He could be seen during the time of respective
recombination and at later times (Chluba et al. 2007;
Rubiño-Martín
et al. 2008; Sethi et al. 2007;
Rubiño-Martín
et al. 2006; Chluba & Sunyaev 2006).
Prior to the reionisation at z 6
the universe was, however, opaque to for instance Ly
radiation
(Becker et al. 2001).
Previous searches for primordial resonant lines were mainly focused on LiH due to its high dipole moment and a possibly high abundance (de Bernardis et al. 1990). New ab initio calculations of reaction rates of LiH destruction in the early universe show, however, that the LiH abundance is too low to allow a detection (Bovino et al. 2009). Another interesting molecule with a high dipole moment is HeH+ which, together with a much higher abundance than LiH, increases the possibility of a detection.
Moreover, non-standard BBN models predict heavy nuclei such as
carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and flourine, which may have created
molecules like CH, OH, NH, HF, and their respective molecular ions (Campos
et al. 2007; Vonlanthen et al. 2009;
Vonlanthen
& Puy 2008; Puy et al. 2007).
For example the abundance of the CH molecule is found
to be higher than the H2D or
HD abundances in the inhomogeneous non-standard
BBN models. In effect, a number of possible
mechanisms have been suggested to generate density perturbations in the
early universe which could survive until the onset of primordial
nucleosynthesis. Such inhomogeneities in the baryon number may
result from non-equilibrium processes in the Big Bang,
for example, occurring
during a putative first-order quantum-chronodynamics (QCD) phase
transition at 100 MeV
or during the electroweak symmetry breaking at
100 GeV. Assuming the
existence of such surviving density fluctuations, some authors have
shown that - in the framework of these non-standard
BBN scenarios - the altered primordial
nucleosynthesis could lead to the synthesis of heavy elements (e.g. Kurki-Suonio
et al. 1997; Lara et al. 2006;
Applegate
et al. 1987; Rauscher et al. 1994).
Note also that these models satisfy the observed primordial elemental
light abundances.
In addition, regardless of BBN model, the first
generation stars of a primordial composition formed at z
20-30 might quickly have polluted the medium with small amounts of
metals with subsequent chemistry (e.g. Cherchneff & Dwek 2009;
Smith
et al. 2009; Mackey et al. 2003;
Bromm
& Larson 2004). Several species have already been
observed at high redshifts. In addition to the high excitation
CO observations at z = 6.4
(Bertoldi et al.
2003) this molecule has also been observed in for example a
damped Lyman-
system
at z = 2.4 (Srianand et al. 2008)
and in a field containing an over-density of Lyman break
galaxies at z = 5.1 (Stanway et al. 2008).
A massive CO reservoir has also been detected at z = 3.9
(Papadopoulos
et al. 2001). An unusually high amount of
neutral hydrogen was found by Frye
et al. (2008) in a 14 Mpc region
surrounding a young galaxy at z = 4.9.
A strong detection of molecular absorption bands, including H2
and CO, was also recently observed from gas within the host galaxy of
the gamma-ray burst 080607 at z = 3.0363
(Prochaska et al.
2009). Several absorption features are still unidentified,
but a H2 column density
of 10
cm-2
was inferred with an excitation temperature of 10-300 K.
The highest redshift object observed today is the gamma-ray
burst of 23 April 2009 at z=8.2 (Tanvir
et al. 2009; Salvaterra et al. 2009).
Some long duration gamma-ray bursts can be primordial supernovaes
originating from the super-massive first generation stars,
i.e. population III stars (Woosley & Bloom 2006).
The continuum of H- has also been suggested to give rise to a detectable signal in terms of a decrease in the CMB spectrum which may superimpose a detectable absorption feature on the CMB. This could be detectable with the Planck satellite, although the strength of this effect has been estimated to quite different values (Black 2006; Schleicher et al. 2008).
Besides producing molecular lines, resonant scattering has an
additional interesting feature that is regardless of peculiar
velocities, this process has the potential of reducing the power of the
CMB primary anisotropies if the molecular abundances are high
enough (Maoli
et al. 1994). Planck may be able to detect also this
decrease in power. There are also several suggestions to use
differential measurements of the broad band CMB angular power
spectrum observed with Planck in the search for resonant lines (e.g. Basu
et al. 2004; Dubrovich et al. 2008;
Schleicher
et al. 2008). To reach the required
sensitivity of the order of K, the main problem to extract these
weak signals with this approach, will be the galactic and
extra-galactic foreground emissions.
Since the most abundant species is neutral hydrogen, a very
interesting and promising transition is the 21 cm line. Such
difficult observations must, however, await the future Low-frequency
Array (LOFAR) and the proposed
Square Kilometer Array (SKA)
which will be able to detect the redshifted 21-cm H I transition
between z
6-11 or at even higher redshifts (e.g. Furlanetto et al. 2009;
Hogan
& Rees 1979). Both instruments, however, face severe
difficulties when subtracting the astrophysical foreground
contamination which is several orders of magnitudes stronger than the
21 cm line (Bowman
et al. 2009).
Most other atomic transitions than the 21 cm line
have much higher required excitation temperatures than the molecular
transitions and, except for H, He and Li, must in
addition have been produced either by the first stars or in a
non-standard BBN. They are therefore only expected to be seen
at redshifts during the epoch of first star formation or some time
after. As a first step, we have therefore
concentrated our searches on optically thin primordial molecular lines.
The redshifted frequencies from z 20-30
of the lowest transitions of ortho- and para-H2
fall at Odin frequencies around 500 GHz. These lines could be
observable in absorption towards for example hot HII regions.
The detectability of H2 rotational
lines in emission associated with the formation of the first stars has
previously been discussed (Kamaya & Silk 2003;
Omukai
& Kitayama 2003) in addition to the ro-vibrational H2 emission
lines (Mizusawa
et al. 2004). In addition,
a number of lines of for example H2+,
H2D+, HD, HD+,
and HeH+ can also be seen from
this epoch.
At redshifts higher than about z
150-200 the kinetic matter temperature is expected to be the same as
the radiation temperature of the CMB due to Compton scattering,
evolving as
![]() |
(2) |
where T0 = 2.725 K is the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) today, as measured by the FIRAS instrument on-board the COBE satellite (Fixsen et al. 1996). During this epoch only resonant scattering may occur since temperature differences are required to produce thermal spectral lines (see Eq. (23)). At redshifts

These temperature differences will force the excitation further away from equilibrium with the radiation, and should enhance spectral absorption distortions at redshifts


The coupling of the excitation temperature to the radiation or
matter temperature differs with species. Polar molecules like HeH+
probably continue to have
coupled to the
CMB temperature, while H2
may remain more strongly coupled to the matter temperature. There are
also situations where the excitation temperature may depend on
molecular formation processes, by which for instance
primordial H2 may remain superthermal
relative to the matter temperature.
The strength of a spectral line depends, in addition to the number density and dipole moment, on the ratio of the upper state energy (in Kelvin) and excitation temperature (see Eq. (13)). Rotational-vibrational lines, with upper state energies of thousands of Kelvin, are therefore only expected for very high redshift sources with a high temperature or from collapsing high-temperature regions at lower redshifts. In such regions the density may be increased above average, and the increased collision rate in these regions will drive the level populations and the excitation temperature towards the high matter temperature.
A detection of several spectral lines is required to secure a molecular identification and a redshift of an emitting source. The spectral distance between rotational lines is, however, rather wide, even though it becomes increasingly more narrow for highly redshifted sources observed below 100-200 GHz. It is thus more likely that a single transition from each object would be seen in the Odin observations. The rotational-vibrational transitions would be more closely spaced, but have a lower probability of detection.
2.2 Observational strategy
Neither the amplitude nor the line widths are known and therefore we
use high spectral resolution to enable detection of narrow lines, and
later re-bin the data to lower resolution. The choice of spectral
resolution affects the root-mean-square noise level
as can be seen from the
radiometer formula
where



The expected signals most likely originate from every direction in the sky, even though they will be stronger from rare high density peaks. However, we needed to observe positions with as low contamination as possible from any known source, and in addition they had to be observable with the Odin satellite for long periods. For these reasons we have observed towards two of the WMAP hot spots in the CMB radiation, out of the Galactic plane. The coordinates are listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Coordinates of observations.
Two different sets of observations were performed with different observation strategies as described below. The first survey took place in 2004 and the second one in 2006-2007. In addition, we performed two sets of deep searches at one frequency setting towards one position in 2007 and 2009.
The Odin 1.1 m offset Gregorian telescope has a
circular beam at 557 GHz and a FWHM beam
width of 2
1
(Frisk
et al. 2003). This corresponds for example
to 540 and 78 kpc at z = 10
and z = 100, respectively
(see also Table C.2,
on-line material). Being outside the atmosphere, and with an
exceptionally high main beam efficiency,
= 0.9,
our intensity calibration is very accurate. The calibration
procedure (the chopper wheel method) of the Odin satellite is
described in Olberg
et al. (2003). The intensity scale in the figures is
expressed in terms of antenna temperature
.
The reconstructed pointing offset was
15
during
most of the time.
Two different single sideband (SSB) receivers, with a typical
side-band suppression of 20 dB, were used simultaneously in
combination with one auto-correlator (AC) and one acousto-optical
spectrometer (AOS). The bandwidth is 1.040 GHz for
the AOS, and 690 MHz for the AC, with a
channel spacing of 0.62 and 1.0 MHz for
the AOS and AC, respectively, and thus
2
10-6
at
= 545 GHz.
The Odin average system temperature is
around 3300 K (SSB) and therefore many hours of
observations are demanded to produce sensitive observations. The
resulting noise levels may very well be too high to allow
a detection, but the intensity of the lines is really not
known and we have therefore taken a pure observational approach.
If no detection is obtained, the resulting upper
limits will be used as input to the noise levels required in future
observations. This approach also applies to the chosen frequency
resolution which is connected to the noise level and final covered
bandwidth.
In each Local Oscillator (LO) setting, the resulting AOS spectra have a very stable baseline except at the band edges where the calibration spectra exhibit a steep increase. The noisy edges are excluded, and then a first or second order polynomial baseline is subtracted before we join all spectra together to form a contiguous spectrum. The AC consists of 7 bands of 100 MHz each in each setting. We subtract a linear baseline in each band before we align and average all spectra. All averages are then joined.
2.2.1 Observations during summer 2004
Our first goal was to cover as wide a frequency band as possible. We
were awarded 337 orbits (1 orbit 1 h
of observation) and performed independent position switching
observations towards the two positions listed in Table 1, using
reference positions offset by -45 arcmin in
declination. Using simultaneous observations of the AOS and AC,
15.5 GHz were covered in steps with each receiver: AC
563-578 GHz
and AOS
547-563 GHz,
giving at total observed frequency band of 31 GHz covering the
full 547-578 GHz band. We spent 5 orbits for each
LO setting and the step size in frequency was
0.5 GHz. The settings and steps were the same as in the first
spectral line survey performed by the Odin satellite towards
the Orion KL nebulae (Olofsson et al. 2007;
Persson
et al. 2007).
2.2.2 Observations during 2006/07
In the next attempt during nine weekends in winter 2006/07 and
one weekend in Aug. 2007 (in total
464 orbits) we changed our observational strategy. We wanted
to lower the noise compared to what we obtained in the 2004
observations, but still needed to cover a wide frequency band. Since
the sizes of the primordial objects are unknown, this time we
also wanted to test different spacings between the signal and reference
positions in order to avoid subtraction of the signal if present in
both positions. A compromise of the above requirements
resulted in the scheme shown in Fig. 1.
Four positions, A-D, were observed where
position A is the previously Hot Spot 1 observed
during 2004. The minimum offset was determined by the Odin
beam size of 2
1,
and thus we chose the following offsets: -5
, -15
,
and -10
in Dec, keeping the same RA During 10 weekends of
observations (
40 orbits/weekend)
we observed all four positions with one frequency setting each weekend.
Table 2
describes how we performed the observations: 10 orbits towards
each pair of positions were observed in a sequence. First towards
position A with B as reference (AB),
then B with C as a reference (BC),
C with D as reference (CD), and
finally D with A as a reference (DA). Thus,
in total we have ten orbits/setting/position for ten different
LO settings.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Observation strategy during the second spectral survey 2006/07
(also described in Table 2).
The Odin beam has a FWHM width of 2
|
Open with DEXTER |
Table 2: Observation strategy 2006/07.
As in the first observation run in 2004, we performed simultaneous observations with the AC and the AOS, but covering other frequency ranges. The final results are spectral surveys in the frequency ranges 542.0-547.5 GHz (AOS) and 486.5-492.0 GHz (AC) towards four positions.
2.3 Deep searches at 543 GHz during 2007 and 2009
In addition to the spectral surveys we also wanted to perform a deep
search to lower the noise even further. In 2007 we therefore
used 40 orbits towards HotSpot1 position A
with B as reference position with 543.250 GHz as
centre frequency with the AOS and 490.250 GHz with
the AC. This produced an rms level of about
10 mK over the 1 GHz band with a channel spacing of
1 MHz, and a possible 4 detection
at 543.1 GHz. To validate the possible
detection, we performed additional observations in April 2009
using 96 orbits and then changed the centre frequency of
the AOS to be 543.1 GHz.
3 Results
No lines were detected and we are thus limited to set upper limits of
possible signals. We choose a 5 noise level as an
upper limit since the peak noise level is always lower than this value
if the noise follows a Gaussian distribution and has
independent velocity channels. In this case,
the probability that an observed 5
line would be a
noise feature is less than 10-6.
The noise is rather stable over the covered band of all
surveys, with a few exceptions where we had loss of observation time.
We therefore measure the 1 noise
level across the total band covered, towards each position. We have
re-binned the AOS data to the AC channel spacing
of 1 MHz, and then re-binned both AOS and AC to
channel spacings of 4 and 16 MHz, with an
example shown in Fig. 2.
This rebinning should lower the noise by a factor of 2
and 4, respectively, if the noise is Gaussian
distributed. However, our measurements do suffer from baselines at a
low level which prevents the noise to follow Eq. (4)
exactly.
All 1
results,
except the deep searches, are found in Tables 3
and 5,
which also include the peak intensity of the noise given in terms of
the measured
.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Examples of the resulting spectra: 2006/07 observations towards Hot
Spot 1 (position A with position B used as
reference) is shown with three
different channel spacings: 1, 4, and 16 MHz
with corresponding 1 |
Open with DEXTER |
Figures A.1 and A.2 (on-line material) show the original AOS spectra used to produce Fig. 2. The intensity is plotted vs. channel numbers and shown for all ten frequency settings.
Note, that we do not know if the signals we seek are absorption or emission lines, or if they are located in the signal or the reference position.
3.1 Comments on results from the 2004 observations
The observations from summer 2004 resulted in a wide frequency band,
but with a rather high noise level. In Table 3 we see
that a typical 1
is about 38 (85), 23 (45), and
15 (26) mK for the AOS(AC) observations
with 1, 4 and 16 MHz channel
spacing, respectively.
Table 3: Upper limits from observations during 2004 using 1, 4 and 16 MHz channel spacings.
3.2 Comments on results from the 2006/07 observations
Due to the new scheme the analysis of these observations is somewhat
different from that of the 2004 observations. As seen from
Fig. 1,
each pair of observations is sensitive to different angular scales of
the perturbations. As an example, if we assume that
the signal is in position A and use B as reference,
this combination is sensitive to a perturbation size between 2-5.
If the primordial cloud is larger than 5
the signal will be present in both A and B and will
disappear in the resulting AB average. We are, however, also
sensitive to larger sizes of the perturbations in A since we
have observations towards position D with A as a
reference. If we switch and use A as signal
and D as reference, we will have an AD average which
is sensitive to scales between 2-30
.
Therefore, we can average both AB and AD together to further lower the
noise with a sensitivity of scales 2-5
.
For larger scales we can only use AD.
A summary of all average combinations for each position with
corresponding angular scale sensitivity is given
in Table 4.
Table 4: Observational strategy 2006/07.
This observation strategy is also a way to check if the signal
is in the signal or reference position. For example,
if there is a signal in position A, and the size of
the perturbation is 2-5,
the signal-to-noise (S/N) will increase by
if we average AB and AD. If the signal is
in B, the signal will be lowered by a factor of two
in the AB+AD average. A signal in the
B position would also be seen in the BC average
with
increase of the S/N in the BA+BC average.
In Table 5 we note that the noise level is considerably lower than in the 2004 observations.
Table 5: Upper limits in mK as a function of angular size on the sky from the spectral surveys observations during 2006/07 (deep searches are not included) using 1, 4 and 16 MHz channel spacings.
3.3 Comments on results of the deep searches
The noise level in both deep searches are considerably lower than the 2004 observations and also lower compared to the surveys in 2006/07. The deep search in 2007 resulted in a noise level of 10 mK with 1 MHz channel spacing. Rebinning to 4 and 16 MHz lowers the noise to 6.5, and 3.5 mK, respectively. The noise level in the 2009 deep search produced an even lower noise level of 6.7 mK with 1 MHz channel spacing, and 4.0, and 2.1 mK when rebinning to 4 and 16 MHz, respectively.
The possible detection in the 2007 deep search did unfortunately not show up again in the 2009 deep search as seen in Fig. 3. The origin of this feature is difficult to explain but may arise from unknown technical issues with the satellite or the receivers.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Deep searches from 2007 and 2009 observations towards the Hot
Spot 1 (position A with position B used as
reference) is shown with a channel spacing of 4 MHz
with 1 |
Open with DEXTER |
4 Analysis
In order to interpret our observations in a cosmological context we
begin with a summary of the cosmological background and the tools by
which we estimate the amplitude of absorption and resonant lines in
Sect. 5
as well as their line widths. This is model dependent and we adopt the
currently favoured hierarchical CDM cosmology with a
cosmological constant in which cold dark matter dominates the evolution
of structure.
The latest results from five-years of WMAP data (Komatsu et al. 2009)
are used, with a Hubble constant H0 = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1,
a dimensionless matter density parameter
= 0.274,
a dark energy density parameter
= 0.726,
and a baryon density
= 0.0456.
This implies a flat geometry where
+
= 1.
The proper length L(z)
of a primordial perturbation can be estimated by using the small-angle
limit of the relation between the angular size
that a cloud subtends on the sky and the angular-diameter
distance
:
In a flat Universe, this distance is described by
where c is the speed of light. Assuming a spherical geometry, the proper length L(z) can be used to calculate the mass of a density perturbation

where



The standard structure formation model predicts the formation
of gravitationally bound systems from tiny density perturbations via
gravitational collapse. The hierarchical model predicts that the
smaller perturbations formed first and then merged or accreted gas to
form even more massive objects. The WMAP5 results are
consistent with an epoch of reionisation at
= 10.9
1.4
(Komatsu et al.
2009). Later reionisation epochs at z
6,
are suggested by other kinds of experiments (e.g. Fan et al. 2006).
This implies that the first stars must have formed at z
6.
They are predicted to form in over-dense dark matter regions
of 105-10
at redshifts of
about 30-40 (e.g. Glover
2005). These
mini-halos may provide a significant, if not dominant,
contribution to reionisation at lower redshifts (Choudhury et al. 2008).
Mass perturbations >10
are predicted not yet to have
reached their collapse phase.
In the linear regime, the density contrast
is predicted to grow linearly
with the scale factor as 1/(1+z).
Sufficiently dense perturbations reach a turn-around point at which
their gravity counterbalances the expansion. Then they enter a collapse
phase during which the density and temperature quickly increase.
Note that during the linear phase, the only predicted possible signal is by the resonant scattering process, while emission and absorption lines will arise in collapsing perturbations or with high temperature regions for example from the first supernovae and their subsequent hot HII regions as background radiation. The amplitude and line width of all lines depend among many variables on the dynamics of the primordial clouds, which conveniently can be divided into the above mentioned phases: the linear phase, the turn-around phase and the collapse phase.
4.1 Linear phase
In the linear phase, the line width will depend on the proper
length L(z) of the
object. This size will occupy a redshift interval
in the Hubble flow, and, assuming a spherical geometry and that every
part of the cloud moves with the same peculiar velocity, we have (e.g. Dubrovich
et al. 2008; Maoli et al. 1996)
where

A relationship between line width and mass in the linear phase
can now be found using Eq. (7)
with
1
and Eq. (8).
The line widths increase with redshift and mass and are very broad,
10-1-10-5,
implying line widths of the order of a few
thousand km s-1
(Table C.3
on-line material). Note, that this is only true assuming that
the density contrast is very small. When the perturbations grow the
line widths will start to deviate from Eq. (8)
and become increasingly more narrow. Another addition of uncertainty to
the line width is our homogeneity assumption of no substructure within
the cloud. Within each mass at its turn-around, there will be smaller
mass perturbations which already have reached their respective
turn-around. The signals from these regions will be very narrow and
superposed on the broader lines from the non-collapsed regions.
As a first order approximation in our analysis,
we will therefore use a line width
of 500 km s-1 in our
predictions of HeH+ resonant lines in
the linear phase in Sect. 5.
The intensity of the resonant lines is estimated to be (e.g. de
Bernardis et al. 1993; Dubrovich et al. 2008;
Maoli
et al. 1996)
where








The spectral index of the CMB
=
)(
is
derived in Maoli
et al. (1996) where
=
and has the general expression
The peculiar velocity describes the motion of primordial perturbations with respect to the Hubble flow. In the

The most commonly used peculiar velocity at present time for the size of a galaxy cluster is





The scattering efficiency of resonant lines is very frequency dependent and depends mainly on two parameters: the number density of the species and the spontaneous transition probability described by the Einstein coefficient Aul, where the subscript ul refers to the upper and lower levels of the scattering species. Those species which have a high product of these quantities are of special interest.
The density of the species depends on redshift and can be
described in terms of the total density of hydrogen and the fractional
abundance of species x as Xx =
.
For simplicity, as a first approximation we
assume that the density is high enough to allow
the number density of the species in an excited state to be described
by the Boltzmann distribution
where








The optical depth at the centre of the line can be calculated,
assuming LTE and a Gaussian line
profile, using
where we have taken the stimulated emission into account, and



4.2 Turn-around phase
During this phase the tendency of a perturbation to collapse under its
gravity just balances its tendency to expand with the rest of the
Universe. The perturbation will appear non-moving and all species from
every part of the perturbation will emit from the same redshift. This
will produce the strongest and the most narrow resonant
lines with a line width determined by the thermal broadening (Maoli et al. 1996)
where m is the atomic mass and A is the mass in atomic mass units of the species. At low temperatures this implies a line width of a few km s-1 at high redshifts for HeH+ (cf. Table C.3, on-line material).
In addition to this, turbulence will also contribute with an unknown, and perhaps dominating, amplitude. A large region will also have a number of clumps which have narrow lines at slightly different velocities. The total line will be a superposition of these lines which will broaden the line. Finally, the cloud also consists of a number of smaller clouds that already have reached their turn-around which also may act as broadening agents. As a first order approximation in our analysis, we will therefore use a line width of 30 km s-1 in our predictions of HeH+ resonant lines in the turn-around phase in Sect. 5.
The integrated intensity of the resonant lines has not changed compared to the linear phase, and thus the amplitude, described by Eq. (9), will increase proportionally to the decrease in line width, which could be up to three orders of magnitude.
As pointed out by Dubrovich
(1997), a luminescence effect may also produce lines
when high energy photons are scattered and decay into several lower
energy photons. The amplitude of lines produced by luminescence is
given by Eq. (9)
times an additional gain coefficient factor K.
For simple elastic scattering K = 1
and for luminescence K 1000.
Dubrovich &
Lipovka (1995) investigated luminescence produced by excited
rotational-vibrational (ro-vib) transitions of H2D+
which decay to the lowest vibrational state emitting via several
rotational transitions. This effect is, however, limited to
high temperature or high density regions.
The turn-around and the beginning of the collapse phase are
identified as the most favourable for observations of resonant lines (Maoli et al. 1996).
It is therefore important to try to estimate at what redshift
this will take place (full derivation in Appendix B,
on-line material). We assume that the power spectrum of the dark matter
density fluctuations is of Harrison-Zeldovich type,
which means
![]() |
(15) |
and that it can be normalised by the observed fluctuations




![]() |
(16) |
The turn-around redshift



Figure 4 shows the turn-around redshift z as a function of mass for one, three, and six

![]() |
Figure 4:
Turn-around redshift for one, three and six
|
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The angular size vs. total mass at
|
Open with DEXTER |
To be able to quantify the signals from the proto-objects to
observables we need to relate the turn-around mass to a linear size
corresponding to an angular size of our beam. At the
turn-around =
5.55
and this should be inserted in Eq. (7)
to find a mass-linear size relationship at the turn-around. We then use
Eqs. (5)-(7)
and (17)
to find the relation between angular size vs. mass
perturbations at turn-around redshift, shown in Fig. 5.
4.3 Non-linear collapse phase
When (1+
the collapse will begin. The
amplitude and line width now depend on the
collapse rate in addition to the peculiar velocity. Depending on the
ratio of the two velocities resonant lines can appear in absorption,
emission or have a double peak (a summary is found in Maoli et al. 1996).
During the initial stages the line widths are expected to increase
compared to the narrow width during the turn-around. This is also the
only evolutionary stage where the peculiar velocity is no longer
required to produce resonant lines.
The chemical abundances could also be substantially modified during the collapse phase of a primordial cloud when the increasing temperature and density induce new chemistry. In such regions, molecules will both be destroyed and produced (Puy & Signore 1996). The first Pop III objects will quickly create a complex, multi-phase interstellar medium with a large range of densities and temperatures; up to 6 orders of magnitude at a given radius (Wise & Abel 2008).
The very energetic radiation from the first collapsed objects
can for instance dissociate molecular hydrogen (e.g. Haiman
et al. 2000,1997). However,
if the amount of H2 produced
in the cooling gas behind shock waves from the first supernova
explosions exceeds the destroyed primordial H2
inside the photodissociation regions, the first objects would have a
net positive feedback on molecular production and galaxy formation. Ferrara (1998)
concludes that multi-supernova explosions propagating through the
interstellar medium can produce regions with a very high H2 abundance.
For a wide range of physical parameters in such regions he found an H2 fraction
of about 6 10-3.
In addition, extremely energetic pair-instability supernovae
(140-260
)
produced large amounts of dust at very early times (e.g. Schneider et al. 2004)
thereby allowing an increased molecular production including H2
and CO. All these effects influence the amplitudes of the
primordial resonant lines and thermal emission and absorption. There
are, however, large uncertainties in the complex H2
and HD chemistry (Glover
& Abel 2008).
The resonant scattering will become suppressed when the density becomes higher than some critical density depending on species, since frequent collisions will cause thermal radiation to dominate over resonant scattering (Basu 2007). The increasing numbers of collisions will drive the level populations and the excitation towards the lower (or higher) matter temperature, and should enhance the spectral line absorption (or emission). This effect will be greatest in molecules like H2 and HD, which have zero or small dipole moments and thus weak transitions.
5 Sensitivity analysis
Our observations have given us upper limits in terms of noise
levels, which we now want to analyse using Eq. (9).
This equation is, however, expressed in intensity while sub-mm
and radio antennas are usually calibrated according to the brightness
temperature in the Rayleigh-Jeans limit in terms of (Rohlfs & Wilson 2004)
Thus, the solution of the radiative transport equation with a constant source function, in our switched observations between signal and reference positions, becomes (cf. Persson et al. 2009)
where





Note that the approximation is only valid if










The beam filling
can be estimated by (cf. Persson
et al. 2009)
where






5.1 Resonant lines
Equation (9)
gives the intensity of the resonant lines.
To express this in Rayleigh-Jeans (RJ) brightness temperature
we use Eq. (19)
and obtain
Note, that the observed antenna temperature is lower by a factor

To estimate the maximum RJ brightness temperature possible we
assume
that the lines in Eq. (22)
are optically thick ( > 1) since this is a
limit after which the line will no longer increase its amplitude. The
results are given in Table 6
with an accuracy depending on the uncertainty of the assumed peculiar
velocities.
Obviously, even taking this uncertainty into account,
the resonant lines would be extremely difficult to detect at
frequencies around 500 GHz and require noise levels orders of
magnitudes lower than our observations. The Odin main beam
temperature
-scale is
related to the flux density by
= 2600 Jy/K
at 543 GHz. Figure A.3
(on-line material) shows
,
and demonstrates that we loose almost two orders of magnitude in
sensitivity around the observed Odin frequencies compared to
frequencies below 200 GHz. This is a very
limiting factor for detecting the already weak resonant lines,
especially for the rotational-vibrational transitions which cannot be
observed below 200-400 GHz if they form around z = 200-400.
The conclusion is therefore that the rotational-vibrational transitions
of resonant lines most likely will be too weak for a detection even
with future much more sensitive antennas.
Table 11:
Estimated largest possible brightness temperature
for optically thick resonant lines, and
=
km s-1.
At frequencies 100-200 GHz
the amplitudes of the resonant lines are orders of magnitudes higher
than around 500-600 GHz, and hence a detection may be
possible if the opacity is high at low frequencies. However,
the resonant lines suffer from their dependence on the
peculiar velocity which lowers their amplitudes by approximately three
orders of magnitude at z = 0, and
even more at higher redshifts (Eqs. (11)
and (22)).
Since thermal emission or absorption lines do not depend on peculiar
velocities, if existing, they have the potential to
be much stronger than the resonant lines.
Note, that these results also need to be corrected for beam filling, if the object is smaller than the beam, and for the beam efficiency to obtain the observable antenna temperature. For the Odin satellite this only lowers the amplitude by 10%, but for other antennas the reduction may be more than 50%.
![]() |
Figure 6:
These plots are an example with the main goal to give an idea of the
pattern of the primordial spectral lines: predicted antenna
temperature
|
Open with DEXTER |
We also estimate the amplitude of optically thin
resonant lines. As an example, with the main goal to
show the pattern of the resonant lines as a function of redshift and to
get a first rough estimate of the amplitudes, we consider the
rotational and first branch of rotational-vibrational resonant
HeH+ lines for four different
redshifts, shown in Fig. 6.
A single perturbation is assumed, with a size filling the
Odin
beam. We have assumed a low density of hydrogen equal to the present
one:
= 2
10-7
(1+z)3 at redshifts
30, and
increased this density 5.55 times at z = 10
(density at turn-around). We have used an HeH+ abundance
relative to hydrogen of X(HeH+) = 10-12
and the background temperature follows the CMB at all redshifts. The
adopted lines widths are narrow with
= 30 km s-1
at z = 10, and broad with
= 500 km s-1
from z
30 as indicated in the legends. This
choice of densities and line widths arises from the fact that for z
10,
the large Odin beam corresponds to much larger physical sizes
and masses than the turn-around objects (Fig. 4),
and at higher redshifts we are therefore most sensitive to objects in
their linear phase. The peculiar velocity is described by Eq. (11)
with
600 km s-1.
Since the CMB temperature follows 2.725(1+z) K,
this implies that high redshift sources have an increased ability to
populate higher molecular energy levels since the rising temperatures
give the photons more energy to excite the molecules. This is
shown in Fig. 6
where high molecular transitions are increasingly populated towards
higher redshifts. The rotational-vibrational transitions are not seen
at all until z 300, and are always
much weaker than the rotational lines at all redshifts. It is
also clearly seen that lines
observed at frequencies around 500 GHz always will be
weaker than around 100 GHz; a clear
disadvantage for our current observations. This could to some extent be
compensated by the previously mentioned luminescence process (Dubrovich 1997) but
has not been considered here.
We should here stress that the predictions of Fig. 6 are based upon rather conservative assumptions. Any increase of abundance and density, or decrease of line width, would directly increase the amplitudes of the HeH+ signals. Note also that the abundance is a function of redshift and that we here simply have assumed that the abundance has reached a maximum value. The HeH+ abundance is indeed very uncertain with a predicted abundance range of 10-8-10-15 (Vonlanthen et al. 2009; Dubrovich et al. 2008).
5.2 Thermal absorption lines
The advantages of the Odin satellite are the absence of adverse effects from the terrestrial atmosphere and the tunable SSB receivers, allowing a spectral coverage of a broad band. However, one severe disadvantage for detection of resonant lines with Odin is the high frequencies. To detect resonant scattering lines the best observing frequencies are below 100-200 GHz considering the rapid decrease of the radiation temperature as shown in Fig. A.3 (on-line material).
There are, however, other possibilities of detecting signals
from the dark ages. Thermal emission or absorption
depend on the competition between radiation and collisions as given by
the radiative transfer equation
where



Equation (23)
states that a strong signal requires a large temperature difference
between the excitation and background temperatures, which can be
produced by for instance collapsing primordial perturbations or the
more rapid cooling of the gas temperature compared to the CMB at even
higher redshifts. If
Eq. (23)
simplifies to
The maximum Rayleigh-Jeans brightness temperature of an absorption line can be estimated using Eq. (24) and assuming an optically thick line, which will cause the last factor to approach unity. The largest possible

Also note that if =
,
the argument of the exponential functions in Eq. (24) can
be written as
![]() |
(25) |
where T0 is the CMB temperature today. This implies that the maximum strength of an absorption line is redshift independent assuming an optically thick transition. In this case, at a chosen observation frequency the amplitude is the same for all species and transitions and is only determined by the known curve J(T0) in Fig. A.3 (on-line material).
Table 14:
Estimated largest possible absorption intensity
at different observing frequencies for optically thick
absorption lines assuming that the background temperature is
the CMB.
If the background temperature is not the CMB, the argument of
the exponential function then becomes
![]() |
(26) |
As seen, the maximum absorption strength in this case depends on both the redshift and the unknown background temperature.
The noise levels in our observations can be used to set upper
limits on possible absorption lines at the observed frequencies. The
background source cannot, however, be the CMB at these
frequencies since the maximum possible absorption intensity of such a
signal is about 3 mK (Table 7).
This corresponds to about 1
of our best observations (deep searches), and even less for the
spectral line surveys. Thus, the analysis in order to put
upper limits using the Odin observations depends on both the unknown
background temperature and the redshift, in addition to the
opacity and excitation temperature. We give a very simple example of
such an analysis in Table 8.
We have here estimated the required background temperature
(other than the CMB) in order to produce an
absorption line with
= 10 mK
at an observing frequency of 550 GHz for some
molecular transitions. We have used two different opacities and assumed
that
(Eq. (24)).
Such an absorption line would correspond to about a 5
detection
for our 2009 deep search using 16 MHz channel spacing, or
a 1-2
detection
for our line surveys using 16 MHz channel spacings
(Table 5).
We have also listed the CMB temperature at the corresponding
redshift as a comparison. A more sophisticated
modelling, including excitation temperatures and estimated opacities,
is demanded to produce more realistic results and to
investigate how the intensities of different transitions vary with the
physical conditions at different epochs.
Table 18:
Estimated required background temperatures to produce absorption lines
with mK at an observing
frequency of 550 GHz assuming
,
and an opacity of one or 10-3.
6 Summary
In order to constrain cosmological models of star and structure
formation as well as the chemical evolution in the early Universe, we
have performed spectral line surveys towards several positions without
any known sources of emission in a search for primordial spectral lines
from the Dark Ages.
The first survey covered a broad band of 31 GHz
between 547-578 GHz towards two positions with fixed
reference-positions. The second survey covered 11 GHz in the
bands 542.0-547.5 GHz and 486.5-492.0 GHz towards
four positions. We also performed two deep searches towards one
position with 543.100 and 543.250 GHz as centre
frequencies. No lines were detected, and thus the results are
upper limits in terms of noise level. Typical 1 values are
5-35 mK in the 11 GHz survey, 14-90 mK in
the 31 GHz survey, and 2-7 mK in the deep searches
over a 1 GHz band.
The major improvement made by the Odin observations compared to de Bernardis et al. (1993) is the broad bandwidth covered allowing a wide range of redshifts to be explored for a number of atomic and molecular species. In addition, in the second survey we have taken into account the unknown sizes of the clouds by testing an observational strategy where we have observed towards four positions in a sequence with different angular distances between the reference and signal position. An important benefit of our observations is that we do no suffer from spectral line contamination from the terrestrial atmosphere.
At low densities and in matter-radiation equilibrium
conditions, the only expected signal
is from resonant line scattering between CMB photons and
matter moving with respect to the expansion of the Universe. These
lines suffer, however, from the dependence of the low
CMB temperature and the peculiar velocities of the moving
primordial perturbations which is about 10-3
at present and even lower at higher redshifts. In order to
obtain an estimate of the highest possible intensities
we assume optically thick resonant lines and no beam-dilution. The
intensities will then be at most of the order of
a few mK at frequencies below 100-200 GHz,
and orders of magnitude lower at higher frequencies (5 K at 600 GHz).
Since the lines most likely have
1 this will further lower their
intensities with orders of magnitudes.
If existing, thermal absorption lines on the other hand have
the potential to be observable at both high and low frequencies. Such
lines do not suffer from the dependence of peculiar velocities of the
moving primordial perturbations. The background radiation could also be
considerably higher than the CMB, thereby producing stronger
lines. The background could for instance be collapsing primordial
perturbations, the first stars which are predicted to form at z 20-30,
or the remnants of pop III supernovae. These
objects probably emitted large amounts of energetic radiation which
foreground primordial perturbations could absorb. Also here we find the
highest possible intensities by assuming optically
thick lines and no beam-dilution. Assuming that the CMB is the
background radiation, we find that the largest possible intensity is
1-2 K below 100 GHz, and of the order of
a few mK around 500 GHz.
If the background radiation is higher than the CMB,
the intensities will increase. Also in this case the opacity
most likely is
which will lower the absorption line intensities, in addition
to beam-dilution.
The strength and line-width of the primordial lines depend on
the evolution of the primordial perturbations. In the first
(linear) phase they are very broad and weak, but become increasingly
stronger and more narrow during the evolution of the cloud. The
turn-around phase, which produces the strongest and most narrow lines,
and the beginning of the collapse have previously been identified as
the most favourable evolutionary phases for observations (Maoli et al. 1996).
We have made a simple estimation of the redshifts and sizes of the
primordial perturbations at their turn-around phase, and find that the
Odin beam size of 2
1
corresponds to a turn-around mass of about 6
10
at a corresponding redshift of
about 3 at a 1
level.
Smaller perturbations at higher redshift will thus suffer from
beam-dilution. A beam-size of 40
,
which is approximately the beam-size of Herschel Space Observatory
, corresponds to
a 1
turn-around
mass and redshift of about 10
and z
10.
The lowest rotational transitions of H2
will fall in the Odin band around 500 GHz from z 20-30,
while the lowest transitions of other species such
as HD, HD+, and HeH+
will fall in the band around 100 GHz from the same epoch.
These transitions may be searched for using ground based
antennas - even though the foreground and atmospheric
radiation will pose a problem.
An important aspect of our work has been to test different
observational strategies to prepare for our forthcoming observations
with the much more sensitive telescope and receivers aboard the
Herschel Space Observatory launched on May 14, 2009.
The much lower noise level and the even broader band coverage
with Herschel will increase the possibility of a detection. Other
interesting facilities to consider in the searches for primordial
molecules are for example the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA),
the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-Wave Astronomy
(CARMA), the IRAM
Plateau de Bure Interferometer and the IRAM 30-m telescope
, and the Very Large Array
(VLA) at
20-45 GHz. Our observing methods and resulting limits, paired
with a sensitivity analysis taking into account the evolution of
primordial perturbations, should be a valuable input to the planning of
these observations.
Spectral lines from primordial atoms and molecules may very well be the only way to probe the epoch of the cosmic Dark Ages and its end when the first stars formed. The search for these primordial signals is a very difficult task indeed, but a detection could be possible with the use of future facilities and would introduce an additional important way to discriminate between models of the early universe as well as star and structure formation.
Research on resonant primordial lines started in our collaboration by Francesco Melchiorri nearly twenty years ago. Now that he left us we miss his enthusiasm and creativity and we would like to dedicate this work to his memory. Many thanks also to John H. Black and Per Bergman for valuable comments and discussions, and to the whole Odin team. We also thank the anonymous referee whose constructive comments led to an improvement of the paper. Generous financial support from the Research Councils and Space Agencies in Sweden, Canada, Finland and France is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- Abel, T., Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 2000, ApJ, 540, 39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Applegate, J. H., Hogan, C. J., & Scherrer, R. J. 1987, Phys. Rev. D, 35, 1151 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barkana, R., & Loeb, A. 2001, Phys. Rep., 349, 125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Basu, K. 2007, New Astron. Rev., 51, 431 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Basu, K., Hernández-Monteagudo, C., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2004, A&A, 416, 447 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Baugh, C. M. 2006, Rep. Prog. Phys., 69, 3101 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Becker, R. H., Fan, X., White, R. L., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2850 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bertoldi, F., Cox, P., Neri, R., et al. 2003, A&A, 409, L47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Black, J. H. 2006, in Faraday Discussions of the Royal Society of Chemistry (UK), Chemistry and cosmology, 133, 27 [Google Scholar]
- Bovino, S., Wernli, M., & Gianturco, F. A. 2009, ApJ, 699, 383 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bowman, J. D., Morales, M. F., & Hewitt, J. N. 2009, ApJ, 695, 183 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bromm, V., & Larson, R. B. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Bromm, V., Yoshida, N., Hernquist, L., & McKee, C. F. 2009, Nature, 459, 49 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campos, J. C., Saucedo Morales, J. C., Lipovka, A. A., & Nunes-Lopez, R. 2007, in IAU Symp. 235, ed. F. Combes, & J. Palous, 413 [Google Scholar]
- Cherchneff, I., & Lilly, S. 2008, ApJ, 683, L123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cherchneff, I., & Dwek, E. 2009, ApJ, 703, 642 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chluba, J., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2006, A&A, 458, L29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Chluba, J., Rubiño-Martín, J. A., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1310 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Choudhury, T. R., Ferrara, A., & Gallerani, S. 2008, MNRAS, 385, L58 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Ciardi, B., & Ferrara, A. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 116, 625 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- de Bernardis, P., Masi, S., Melchiorri, B., & Melchiorri, F. 1990, ApJ, 357, 8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- de Bernardis, P., Dubrovich, V., Encrenaz, P., et al. 1993, A&A, 269, 1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- De Lucia, G., & Poggianti, B. M. 2008, in ASP Conf. Ser., ed. T. Kodama, T. Yamada, & K. Aoki, 399, 314 [Google Scholar]
- Diemand, J., & Kuhlen, M. 2008, ApJ, 680, L25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dubrovich, V., Bajkova, A., & Khaikin, V. B. 2008, New Astron., 13, 28 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dubrovich, V. K. 1977, Sov. Astron. Lett., 3, 128 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Dubrovich, V. K. 1997, A&A, 324, 27 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Dubrovich, V. K., & Lipovka, A. A. 1995, A&A, 296, 301 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Dunkley, J., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 306 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis, R., & Silk, J. 2007 [arXiv:0712.2865] [Google Scholar]
- Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Becker, R. H., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrara, A. 1998, ApJ, 499, L17 [Google Scholar]
- Fixsen, D. J., Cheng, E. S., Gales, J. M., et al. 1996, ApJ, 473, 576 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Frisk, U., Hagström, M., Ala-Laurinaho, J., et al. 2003, A&A, 402, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Frye, B. L., Bowen, D. V., Hurley, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 685, L5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Furlanetto, S. R., Lidz, A., Loeb, A., et al. 2009, Astron., 2010, 83 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Galli, D., & Palla, F. 1998, A&A, 335, 403 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Galli, D., & Palla, F. 2002, Planet. Space Sci., 50, 1197 [Google Scholar]
- Glover, S. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 117, 445 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Glover, S. C. O., & Abel, T. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1627 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Glover, S. C. O., Clark, P. C., Greif, T. H., et al. 2008, in IAU Symp., ed. L. K. Hunt, S. Madden, & R. Schneider, 255, 3 [Google Scholar]
- Gosachinskij, I. V., Dubrovich, V. K., Zhelenkov, S. R., Il'in, G. N., & Prozorov, V. A. 2002, Astron. Rep., 46, 543 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Greif, T. H., Johnson, J. L., & Bromm, V. 2008a, in First Stars III, ed. B. W. O'Shea, & A. Heger, AIP Conf. Ser., 990, 405 [Google Scholar]
- Greif, T. H., Johnson, J. L., Klessen, R. S., & Bromm, V. 2008b, MNRAS, 387, 1021 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Haiman, Z., Rees, M. J., & Loeb, A. 1997, ApJ, 476, 458 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Haiman, Z., Abel, T., & Rees, M. J. 2000, ApJ, 534, 11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hogan, C. J., & Rees, M. J. 1979, MNRAS, 188, 791 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Jee, M. J., Rosati, P., Ford, H. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 672 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., et al. 1998, ApJ, 499, 20 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, J. L., & Bromm, V. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 247 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Kamaya, H., & Silk, J. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 1256 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 330 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kurki-Suonio, H., Jedamzik, K., & Mathews, G. J. 1997, ApJ, 479, 31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lara, J. F., Kajino, T., & Mathews, G. J. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 73, 083501 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lepp, S., & Shull, J. M. 1984, ApJ, 280, 465 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lepp, S., Stancil, P. C., & Dalgarno, A. 2002, J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Phys., 35, 57 [Google Scholar]
- Loeb, A. 2008 [arXiv:0804.2258] [Google Scholar]
- Longair, M. S. 2008, Galaxy Formation, ed. M. S. Longair (Berlin: Springer) [Google Scholar]
- Mackey, J., Bromm, V., & Hernquist, L. 2003, ApJ, 586, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Maoli, R., Ferrucci, V., Melchiorri, F., Signore, M., & Tosti, D. 1996, ApJ, 457, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Maoli, R., Melchiorri, F., & Tosti, D. 1994, ApJ, 425, 372 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mizusawa, H., Nishi, R., & Omukai, K. 2004, PASJ, 56, 487 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Nordh, H. L., von Schéele, F., Frisk, U., et al. 2003, A&A, 402, L21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Okamoto, T. 2008, in New Horizons in Astronomy, ed. A. Frebel, J. R. Maund, J. Shen, & M. H. Siegel, ASP Conf. Ser., 393, 111 [Google Scholar]
- Olberg, M., Frisk, U., Lecacheux, A., et al. 2003, A&A, 402, L35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Olofsson, A. O. H., Persson, C. M., Koning, N., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 791 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Omukai, K., & Kitayama, T. 2003, ApJ, 599, 738 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Papadopoulos, P., Ivison, R., Carilli, C., & Lewis, G. 2001, Nature, 409, 58 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Persson, C. M., Olofsson, A. O. H., Koning, N., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 807 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Persson, C. M., Olberg, M., . Hjalmarson, Å., et al. 2009, A&A, 494, 637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Prochaska, J. X., Sheffer, Y., Perley, D. A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 691, L27 [Google Scholar]
- Puy, D., Alecian, G., Le Bourlot, J., Leorat, J., & Pineau Des Forets, G. 1993, A&A, 267, 337 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Puy, D., Dubrovich, V., Lipovka, A., Talbi, D., & Vonlanthen, P. 2007, A&A, 476, 685 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Puy, D., & Signore, M. 1996, A&A, 305, 371 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Puy, D., & Signore, M. 2007, New Astron. Rev., 51, 411 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rauscher, T., Applegate, J. H., Cowan, J. J., Thielemann, F.-K., & Wiescher, M. 1994, ApJ, 429, 499 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rohlfs, K., & Wilson, T. L. 2004, Tools of radio astronomy, ed. K. Rohlfs, & T. L. Wilson [Google Scholar]
- Rubiño-Martín, J. A., Chluba, J., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1939 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rubiño-Martín, J. A., Chluba, J., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2008, A&A, 485, 377 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Salvaterra, R., Della Valle, M., Campana, S., et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 1258 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santoro, F., & Shull, J. M. 2006, ApJ, 643, 26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schleicher, D. R. G., Galli, D., Palla, F., et al. 2008, A&A, 490, 521 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, R., Ferrara, A., & Salvaterra, R. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sethi, S. K., Subrahmanyan, R., & Roshi, D. A. 2007, ApJ, 664, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sethi, S. K., Nath, B. B., & Subramanian, K. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1589 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Signore, M., & Puy, D. 2009, Eur. Phys. J. C, 59, 117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Silk, J. 1968, ApJ, 151, 459 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, B. D., Turk, M. J., Sigurdsson, S., O'Shea, B. W., & Norman, M. L. 2009, ApJ, 691, 441 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Srianand, R., Noterdaeme, P., Ledoux, C., & Petitjean, P. 2008, A&A, 482, L39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Stanway, E. R., Bremer, M. N., Davies, L. J. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Steigman, G. 2007, Ann. Rev. Nuc. Part. Sci., 57, 463 [Google Scholar]
- Tanvir, N. R., Fox, D. B., Levan, A. J., et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 1254 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vonlanthen, P., & Puy, D. 2008, in SF2A-2008: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. C. Charbonnel, F. Combes, & R. Samadi, 355 [Google Scholar]
- Vonlanthen, P., Rauscher, T., Winteler, C., et al. 2009, A&A, 503, 47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Wise, J. H., & Abel, T. 2008, ApJ, 685, 40 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Woosley, S. E., & Bloom, J. S. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 507 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Appendix A: Figures
![]() |
Figure A.1: Spectra from weekend 1-5 vs. channels for Position A with B as reference from the 2006/07 survey in original shape and channel spacing 0.62 MHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.2: Spectra from weekend 6-10 vs. channels for Position A with B as reference from the 2006/07 survey in original shape and channel spacing 0.62 MHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.3:
The blue thick line shows the radiation temperature J(T0),
and the red thin line shows J(T0) |
Open with DEXTER |
Appendix B: The turn-around redshift as a function of density fluctuations on the last scattering surface
Let the unperturbed density at the last scattering surface (LSS) be
,
where
is
the matter density,
is
the dark energy density and
the
radiation energy density. Since the matter density is very dominant
at LSS
.
This implies that the critical density
since we assume that the curvature density
is
zero. The density parameter at the LSS then becomes
.
Let a perturbed density at LSS
with the (large) scale
be defined by
![]() |
(B.1) |
where



![]() |
(B.2) |
where
![]() |
(B.3) |
If

The scale
in the unperturbed region at the turn-around time
is then (cf. Longair
2008, Eq. (16.3))
![]() |
(B.4) |
Since


![]() |
(B.5) |
If

![]() |
(B.6) |
We may replace


Consider now density fluctuations of the Harrison-Zeldovich type (cf. Longair 2008, page 390-392), where
Note that this relation may be expressed as
assuring that black holes are not formed excessively on small or large scales.
Assume now that Eq. (B.8) can be
normalised by the observed fluctuations
of the mass MS=3.72
(cf. Longair
2008, Eq. (15.13)) within the sound horizon at the
last scattering surface where
.
Equation (B.8)
is then normalised to
Expressing



![]() |
(B.11) |
Note that

Inserting Eq. (B.10)
and MS we
get,
This derivation is valid for dark matter. Baryon structure formation, also driven by gravitational forces, has as well been affected by Silk damping (Silk 1968) and sound waves. This complication introduces a minor modification to the power spectrum of the density fluctuations (page 412 in Longair 2008), but approximatively our derivation should hold also for the baryonic matter. More worrisome for the Harrison-Zeldovich scenario are perhaps the findings of massive galaxy clusters at high redshifts, for instance XMMU J2235.3-2557 at z = 1.4 with a estimated projected mass of the cluster within 1 Mpc of




It should perhaps be noted that masses on the order of
have turnaround redshifts on the order of
103-104.
This means that black holes of this size could form shortly thereafter
if the collapse is not halted by induced angular momentum.
Appendix C: Tables
Table C.1: The ranges in redshifts covered by our observations for the five lowest rotational lines of H2, HD, and HeH+.
Table C.2: Physical sizes corresponding to the Odin beam and the different angular steps in the 2006/07 observations.
Table C.3: Line widths in the linear phase for a perturbation corresponding to the Odin beam at a number of redshifts.
Footnotes
- ... Odin
- Odin is a Swedish-led satellite project funded jointly by the Swedish National Space Board (SNSB), the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), the National Technology Agency of Finland (Tekes) and Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES). The Swedish Space Corporation was the prime contractor and also is responsible for the satellite operation.
- ... Explorer
- http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/
- ... Planck
- http://planck.esa.int
- ...
Array
- http://www.lofar.org/
- ...
(SKA)
- http://www.skatelescope.org/
- ... Observatory
- http://herschel.esac.esa.int/
- ... Array
- http://www.alma.info/
- ... Astronomy
- http://www.mmarray.org/
- ... telescope
- http://www.iram.fr/
- ... Array
- http://www.vla.nrao.edu/
All Tables
Table 1: Coordinates of observations.
Table 2: Observation strategy 2006/07.
Table 3: Upper limits from observations during 2004 using 1, 4 and 16 MHz channel spacings.
Table 4: Observational strategy 2006/07.
Table 5: Upper limits in mK as a function of angular size on the sky from the spectral surveys observations during 2006/07 (deep searches are not included) using 1, 4 and 16 MHz channel spacings.
Table 11:
Estimated largest possible brightness temperature
for optically thick resonant lines, and
=
km s-1.
Table 14:
Estimated largest possible absorption intensity
at different observing frequencies for optically thick
absorption lines assuming that the background temperature is
the CMB.
Table 18:
Estimated required background temperatures to produce absorption lines
with mK at an observing
frequency of 550 GHz assuming
,
and an opacity of one or 10-3.
Table C.1: The ranges in redshifts covered by our observations for the five lowest rotational lines of H2, HD, and HeH+.
Table C.2: Physical sizes corresponding to the Odin beam and the different angular steps in the 2006/07 observations.
Table C.3: Line widths in the linear phase for a perturbation corresponding to the Odin beam at a number of redshifts.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1:
Observation strategy during the second spectral survey 2006/07
(also described in Table 2).
The Odin beam has a FWHM width of 2
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Examples of the resulting spectra: 2006/07 observations towards Hot
Spot 1 (position A with position B used as
reference) is shown with three
different channel spacings: 1, 4, and 16 MHz
with corresponding 1 |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Deep searches from 2007 and 2009 observations towards the Hot
Spot 1 (position A with position B used as
reference) is shown with a channel spacing of 4 MHz
with 1 |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Turn-around redshift for one, three and six
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The angular size vs. total mass at
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6:
These plots are an example with the main goal to give an idea of the
pattern of the primordial spectral lines: predicted antenna
temperature
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure A.1: Spectra from weekend 1-5 vs. channels for Position A with B as reference from the 2006/07 survey in original shape and channel spacing 0.62 MHz. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure A.2: Spectra from weekend 6-10 vs. channels for Position A with B as reference from the 2006/07 survey in original shape and channel spacing 0.62 MHz. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure A.3:
The blue thick line shows the radiation temperature J(T0),
and the red thin line shows J(T0) |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.