Issue |
A&A
Volume 699, July 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A108 | |
Number of page(s) | 13 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452029 | |
Published online | 01 July 2025 |
Galaxy assembly and evolution in the P-Millennium simulation: Galaxy clustering
1
INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, I-34143 Trieste, Italy
2
IFPU – Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, Via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, Italy
3
Tianjin Astrophysics Center, Tianjin Normal University, Binshuixidao 393, 300384 Tianjin, China
4
EPFL – Institute for Physics, Laboratory for Galaxy Evolution, Observatoire de Sauverny, Chemin Pegasi 51, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
5
ICC – Institute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
6
Institute for Data Science, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
⋆ Corresponding author: fabio.fontanot@inaf.it
Received:
28
August
2024
Accepted:
9
May
2025
We present the results from the latest version of the GAlaxy Evolution and Assembly (GAEA) theoretical model of galaxy formation coupled with merger trees extracted from the Planck Millennium Simulation (PMS). With respect to the Millennium Simulation, typically adopted in our previous work, the PMS provides a better mass resolution (∼108 h−1 M⊙), a larger volume (8003 Mpc3), and assumes cosmological parameters consistent with latest results from the Planck mission. The model includes, at the same time, a treatment for the partition of cold gas into atomic and molecular (H2) components; a better treatment for environmental processes acting on satellite galaxies; an updated modelling of cold gas accretion on supermassive black holes, leading to the phenomenon of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and relative feedback on the host galaxy. We compare GAEA predictions based on the PMS, with model realizations based on other simulations in the Millennium Suite at different resolution, showing that the new model provides a remarkable consistency for most statistical properties of galaxy populations. We interpret this as being due to the interplay between AGN feedback and H2-based SFR (both acting as regulators of the cold gas content of model galaxies), as model versions considering only one of the two mechanisms do not show the same level of consistency. We then compare model predictions with available data for the galaxy two-point correlation function (2pCF) in the redshift range 0 < z ≲ 3. We show that GAEA runs correctly recover the main dependences of the 2pCF as a function of stellar mass (M⋆), star formation activity, HI-content, and redshift for M⋆ > 109 M⊙ galaxies. These results suggest that our model correctly captures both the distribution of galaxy populations in the large-scale structure and the interplay between the main physical processes regulating their baryonic content, both for central and satellite galaxies. The model predicts a small redshift evolution of the clustering amplitude that results in an overprediction of z ∼ 3 clustering strength with respect to the available estimates, but is still consistent with data within 1σ uncertainties.
Key words: galaxies: evolution / galaxies: formation / galaxies: star formation / galaxies: statistics / galaxies: stellar content
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.