Issue |
A&A
Volume 689, September 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A62 | |
Number of page(s) | 14 | |
Section | Catalogs and data | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450155 | |
Published online | 04 September 2024 |
Asymptotic giant branch stars in the eROSITA-DE eRASS1 catalog
1
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC,
Glorieta de la Astronomía S/N,
Granada
18008,
Spain
e-mail: mar@iaa.es
2
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian,
60 Garden St.,
Cambridge,
MA
01238,
USA
3
Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, USP,
Av. Arlindo Bettio 1000,
03828-000
São Paulo,
Brazil
4
Instituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
58089
Morelia,
Michoacán,
Mexico
5
School of Physics and Astronomy and Laboratory for Multiwavelength Astrophysics, Rochester Institute of Technology,
Rochester,
NY,
USA
6
Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology,
USA
Received:
27
March
2024
Accepted:
28
June
2024
Context. Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars are not expected to be X-ray-emitters, yet a small fraction of them, the so-called X-AGBs, show X-ray emission that can be attributed to coronal activity of a companion or accretion onto one.
Aims. By searching the recently released SRG eROSITA-DE eRASS1 source catalog, we aim to increase the sample of known X-AGBs and investigate their X-ray and far-UV properties. So far, 36 X-AGBs have been reported, which includes 21 previous detections from ROSAT RASS, Chandra, and XMM-Newton and 15 recent detections from eROSITA eRASS1.
Methods. We cross-correlated the position of sources in the eROSITA-DE eRASS1 catalog with the largest available samples of AGB stars in order to find possible X-ray counterparts. We carefully checked the possible counterparts by comparing X-ray and near-IR K images, disregarding those affected by optical loading, those found to be diffuse sources, or those simply considered unreliable positional associations.
Results. We have found seven high-confidence X-AGBs and another seven possible ones. Accounting for previous X-ray detections, the sample of X-AGBs is increased by 11 new sources, increasing the sample of X-AGBs from 36 up to 47. Adding these sources to previous eROSITA-DE eRASS1 X-AGB detections, eROSITA has so far discovered 26 new X-AGBs, more than doubling the number of known X-AGBs. This demonstrates eROSITA’s capability to detect X-AGBs despite the challenge posed by the optical loading caused by their near-IR brightness, which makes the X-ray detection untrustworthy in a number of cases.
Conclusions. The eRASS1 X-AGBs tend to have a higher X-ray luminosity than that of previously detected X-AGBs, suggesting a bias toward brighter sources that is very likely due to the short exposure time of eRASS1 sources. A comparison of the X-ray and far-UV luminosity of X-AGBs with those of X-ray-emitter symbiotic stars (X-SySts) revealed an overlap in the X-ray luminosity range 1029.5 < LX (erg s−1) <1033.0. The average higher X-ray luminosity of X-SySts AGBs (≈1032 erg s−1) can be interpreted as X-ray emission arising from a boundary layer between an accretion disk and a white dwarf, whereas the average lower X-ray luminosity (≈5 × 1030 erg s−1) of X-AGBs would arise from an accretion disk around main-sequence or subgiant F-K companion stars.
Key words: accretion, accretion disks / stars: AGB and post-AGB / binaries: general / X-rays: binaries
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.