Issue |
A&A
Volume 682, February 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A147 | |
Number of page(s) | 27 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347584 | |
Published online | 14 February 2024 |
The hydrostatic-to-lensing mass bias from resolved X-ray and optical-IR data
1
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LPSC-IN2P3, 53 avenue des Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France
e-mail: miren.munoz@lpsc.in2p3.fr
2
Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
3
Univ. de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, CNRS, IRAP, 31028 Toulouse, France
4
High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439, USA
5
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), C/Vía Láctea s/n, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
6
Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy
7
INAF, IASF-Milano, Via A. Corti 12, 20133 Milano, Italy
8
Departamento de Física Teórica and CIAFF, Facultad de Ciencias, Modulo 8, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
9
Centro de Investigación Avanzada en Física Fundamental (CIAFF), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Received:
21
July
2023
Accepted:
13
November
2023
An accurate reconstruction of galaxy cluster masses is key to use this population of objects as a cosmological probe. In this work we present a study on the hydrostatic-to-lensing mass scaling relation for a sample of 53 clusters whose masses were reconstructed homogeneously in a redshift range between z = 0.05 and 1.07. The M500 mass for each cluster was indeed inferred from the mass profiles extracted from the X-ray and lensing data, without using a priori observable-mass scaling relations. We assessed the systematic dispersion of the masses estimated with our reference analyses with respect to other published mass estimates. Accounting for this systematic scatter does not change our main results, but enables the propagation of the uncertainties related to the mass reconstruction method or used dataset. Our analysis gives a hydrostatic-to-lensing mass bias of (1−b) = 0.739−0.070+0.075 and no evidence of evolution with redshift. These results are robust against possible subsample differences.
Key words: cosmology: observations / large-scale structure of Universe
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.